DOCSLIB.ORG

The Threshing Floor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Threshing Floor The Threshing Floor ‘One day Naomi her mother-in-law said to her, “My daughter, should I not try to find a home for you, where you will be well provided for? Is not Boaz, with whose servant girls you have been, a kinsman of ours? Tonight he will be winnowing barley on the threshing-floor.’ Ruth 3:1-2 Naomi's husband and two sons had died and so she returned from Moab to her home town Bethlehem in Israel as a bitter woman 'call me Mara' = 'call me bitter'. Her loving daughter-in-law Ruth had also lost her husband and could have returned to her natural family but instead had given up her old life to be with - and provide for Naomi. Ruth's unconditional love had gone a long way in helping to heal Naomi's hurt and the bitterness of losing her husband and both sons. So now Naomi wanted to provide for Ruth and she knew exactly how to do that - and the time was right. Because the barley and the wheat harvesting was finished and it was time to thresh the grain.... It was time to separate the wheat from the chaff! After the harvesting was done - the sheaves of grain were taken to the threshing floor. This was usually a large flat rock usually located outside the village - in a place exposed to the wind. The threshing floor could be owned by the whole village or by one family; and because of the relatively flat surface the threshing floor would also used to hold public gatherings. The sheaves were untied and the grain was spread out in a circle and then threshed. Or as it was originally called - 'thrashed' - the word meaning ' to tramp or stamp heavily with the feet'. In those days threshing was done by the feet of animals - or by a threshing sledge which was pulled by animals - usually oxen. The threshing sledge was a platform made of flat boards - sometimes with an upturned front end resembling a toboggan - with stones or metal spikes fixed underneath it. It was either weighted down with more stones - or by children who would stand on it! And if necessary Mum would take turns and stand on it! The oxen were usually tied to a stake or tree and would be walked round and round dragging the heavy threshing board behind them. This would tear the ears of grain from the stalks, and loosen the grain itself from the husks. After the threshing process the crushed and broken stalks and the grain were collected. Then in the evening it was the master’s job to do the winnowing with a wooden winnowing fork or winnowing fan. The fork or fan was used to throw the threshed stalks and grain into the air - and allow the cool evening breezes to blow on it. This meant the chaff was blown away, while the straw, which wasn't so light was blown just a short distance away. Leaving the heavier grain to fall down in a pile at the winnower's feet, into a shallow basket or a woven mat. This was then taken up and stored in the barn. The barn was constructed with a board across the doorway in order to prevent the threshed grain from spilling out of the barn. Thus giving the origin of the term thresh...hold! The straw was next to be gathered up and stored. It was used as - a) Bedding for the animals and for fodder when needed. b) Making bricks - like in the days of the Pharaohs when the Children of Israel were slaves and had to make bricks to build the pyramids. c) Making baskets and mats - using the longer stemmed 'wheat' stalks. As for the chaff - if it was not blown completely away - it was burned up - as it was absolutely useless! DARNEL Before the harvesting and the threshing took place there was another separating out that had to take place. Jesus spoke about it in the parable of the wheat and the tares (referring to the End of the Ages) when the angels gather in the final harvest of saved mankind. Mt 13:24-30; 36-43. The word translated 'tares' or weeds in some Bible versions refers to a type of ryegrass, called darnel. Darnel resembles wheat especially in its early stages of growth - except the grains aren't golden they are black - and they are poisonous! Once sown, the darnel would grow up with the wheat, taking out the goodness from the land and choking the wheat alongside it. Those listening to Jesus were a farming community and, whether they understood or not what Jesus was actually saying, they would have known all about tares being sown among the wheat by an enemy. Because it was a tactic that could be used by an antagonistic neighbour. In fact in Roman times they passed a law prohibiting the sowing of darnel among the wheat. But sowing tares among the wheat was also a tactic of war. A neighbouring enemy kingdom would sow darnel among the wheat in order to destroy the harvest - and conquer the people into submission by starvation. Therefore before the wheat could be harvested and threshed to separate it out from the chaff the darnel had to be removed. Otherwise the food would be contaminated - and the whole harvest would be lost! The parable of the wheat and the tares shows us that the tares / the darnel is the sin that the enemy uses to contaminate mankind. Where God sowed wheat when He created Adam & Eve in His Image - the enemy, by deception, sowed poisonous seeds of doubt that were accepted took root and grew up into 'tares of sin'. From that point on the 'wheat' - of being made in His Image - and the poisonous tares of sin have grown alongside each other within man. There is much 'wheat' to be seen in the innocence of little children. But alongside that we can also see evidence of the 'tares of sin' in them. As the children grow - depending on who cultivates them - and how they are cultivated - the tares continue to grow with the wheat. Sometimes it's sad to say, the tares choke the goodness of the wheat thus making it completely unfruitful. Removing poisonous tares can be equated with our initial salvation. They are removed through repentance and faith in Him - when we are born again. Only when the poisonous tares are removed can God reap the harvest of His original plan for us. But we still need to be alert to detect the poisonous seeds of doubt and sin that the enemy wants to sew amongst the fruitful wheat of our ongoing lives. Be alert to the seeds that produce the poison of un- forgiveness, bitterness, un-confessed sin, doubting the character of God, etc. We have to keep alert to the enemy's tactics and keep weeding! If the poison is not removed it will ruin the crop, making us unfruitful. Making it impossible for us to fulfil God's purpose for our lives - in feeding the hungry! But through repentance we can receive His mercy and grace - allowing Him to take that sin and even sow a new crop if needed & begin again. His mercies are new every morning! Lamentations 3:23 CHAFF AND WHEAT Separating the tares from the wheat is a completely different thing than separating the chaff from the wheat. Chaff is often used in scripture as a symbol of that which is worthless. But in its original state, as the hard husk around the fruitful kernel of the wheat, it is a necessary part of the plant. The wheat needs the husk around it in order to survive the various weather conditions it has to endure as it grows. The husk is there to keep the kernel of wheat safe and secure inside. The husk is needed - BUT ONLY FOR A SEASON! Once the grain is ready and it's harvested, the husk is no longer needed...... it is no longer relevant! Beyond its designated usefulness, the husk is an obstacle to extracting or releasing the goodness that’s contained in the wheat kernel. Therefore the husk has to be threshed and blown away OR the effort of growing and harvesting - will be wasted! The people will be denied bread, denied the staple food for life. Threshing releases the fruitfulness that is contained within our lives! The staple food of His life within - the bread of relationship with Him & others. Life, circumstances, the enemy can all be instrumental in the threshing process of our lives. Are you feeling threshed by your immediate circumstance? Are you feeling there is an ongoing crushing through what is happening in your life or by people? If so, then no matter who or what does the threshing, remember - you have the Rock of Christ underneath you! It’s the Master that does the winnowing afterwards! And all is offered up to the wind / the breath of the Holy Spirit - Ruach H' Qadosh. Because only He can separate the wheat from the chaff. Once threshed no man could physically separate the wheat from the chaff. Nor can we spiritually. Only He knows what is irrelevant and what is useful. The chaff - that which is irrelevant and worthless He blows away. The straw - which is useful and has purpose - will be kept and stored. The grain - that which will feed and benefit many - will fall at His feet! It will be gathered up and placed in our spiritual storehouse / storeroom ready to bring out at any appropriate time for any appropriate situation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Progress of the Early Threshing Machine
    The Progress of the Early Threshing Machine By STUAR.T MACDONALD HKESHING was as basic to agricul- diffusion from Scottish origins; in many parts ture as agriculture was to the national of England the flail remained the dominant T economy. New crop rotations, better --sometimes fl~e only--means of threslfing manuring, and increased potential arable for the next half-century. "The thrashing of acreage may have produced more grain to be corn is performed in two ways; by manual sold at greater profit in the buoyant grain labour, as with the flail, and by mechanical market of the late eighteenth and early nine- means, as the thraslfing machine. The flail... teenth centuries, but the importance of the is still used in a great part of England to essential linking process--threslfing--seems separate the corn from its straw. ''s The ma- to have escaped comparable attention. Before chine was revolutionary in function com- the z78o's, the most efficient way of separating pared with the flail and in scale compared with grain from straw was to employ teams of men the size and cost of other farm implements. 6 throughout the winter months to hit the corn That such a keystone of revolution should with flails. The work was hard, it was dirty, prove invaluable to some and valueless to inefficient, slow, and at a time of rapid agri- others seems a matter of some interest and cultural change and some agricultural pro- importance and has provoked this enquiry. gress, primitive. Not until I7o°6 was a machine invented capable of relieving arable agricul- I ture from its annual epic drudgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind of Doctrine Threshing and Winnowing
    Wind of Doctrine Threshing and Winnowing PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:06:53 UTC Contents Articles Threshing 1 Winnowing 2 Threshing floor 4 Chaff 4 Harvest 6 Wheat 7 Epiphany (feeling) 23 References Article Sources and Contributors 25 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 26 Article Licenses License 27 Threshing 1 Threshing Threshing is the process of loosening the edible part of cereal grain (or other crop) from the scaly, inedible chaff that surrounds it. It is the step in grain preparation after harvesting and before winnowing, which separates the loosened chaff from the grain. Threshing does not remove the bran from the grain. Threshing may be done by beating the grain using a flail on a threshing floor. Another traditional method of threshing is to make donkeys or An animal powered thresher oxen walk in circles on the grain on a hard surface. A modern version of this in some areas is to spread the grain on the surface of a country road so the grain may be threshed by the wheels of passing vehicles. However, in developed areas it is now mostly done by machine, usually by a combine harvester, which harvests, threshes, and winnows the grain while it is still in the field. The cereal may be stored in a threshing barn. A Threshing Bee is a festival held in communities to commemorate this process. The event is often held over multiple days and includes flea markets, activity booths, hog wrestling and dances.
    [Show full text]
  • Cass City H Onicl, E
    CASS CITY H ONICL, E. ..... ~o~ ,: -, Vol. 14, No. 6. CASS CITY, MICH.; FRIDAY, JUNE 7, 1918 ..... 8 PAGES l I ' l II llll I M ' l'!'l : 'i I '- "l'~l ' r ,, .... - , '~ ~ ., , . ~ ..~ W. S. DN[ ! Y" ~" A. ELyCT___OFFICERS.S '~flT II IN~r~ NHrN " plying ~omforts and delicacies to men tUliRiViril |ivrK tlinger long in their memories. ,,~,,,m,,,,L,~ v,,~,, ] ,'When will the war end? That's a [ "e andS:Lyre rtoepfgen Brought EFFOT'R the '~business meeting of the Y. mnt,mmmnr nm, n|nln[hard:'q uesti°n. If it depends on man ,P. A. held at the home of Miss Grace N[XTDDU)IIY I Meiser on Tuesday evening, the fol- IiiigflNi:F iiN Pfl~iNIpower it may be two or three years T°ge~her~by Lost Aviator" gl[J|~||~. U|| |~i|D~[bef0re the allies will be victorious. [IN DECORATIONDAYI , [lowifig officers were elected for the "' "~f ~he e~d ma~" come in si~ weeks ,en~uin~= six months: President, Alma Mark. trove been, ~IOOKIIIg '* for a fev ........oi.lA blOll" ~L. and Mrs. P. A. Koepfgen of Cass TUSCOLA COUNTY'S QUOTA HAS Vice President, Roy Striffier. W:. GORDON HIN~S, BACK FROM in Germany and Austria. I saw Ger- CLOUDS FAIL TO DARKEN THE City, had a happy meeting in France recentT~f ~~B0th ~young ~eh~are in the~:~ ~EEN INCRF~SED TO , ~Secretary, Stanley:Striffler. : :;;FRANCE,.GIVES HIS, OPINION man.) l?riso~rs, on .Apl~l. 9 who ~wp:re sPIRIT 0F PATRIOTISM ~. bdgs¢'~round their feet~{~ place of aviation service but in different com- " $557,380.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimum Cereal Combine Harvester Operation by Means of Automatic Machine and Threshing Speed Control
    Optimum cereal combine harvester operation by means of automatic machine and threshing speed control : LANDBOUWCATALOGUS 0000 0086 5713 m Promotoren: ir. A. Moens hoogleraar in de landbouwkundige aspecten van de landbouwwerktuigkunde alsmede de landbouwbedrijfsmechanisatie ir. O. H. Bosgra buitengewoon hoogleraar in de meet-, regel- en systeemtechnie k /^o11ö\,%t W. Huisman Optimum cereal combine harvester operation by means of automatic machine and threshing speed control Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor in de landbouwwetenschappen, op gezagva n de rector magnificus, dr. C. C. Oosterlee, hoogleraar in de veeteeltwelenschap, in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 30 november 1983 des namiddags te vier uur in de aula van de Landbouwhogeschool te Wageningen. Abstract Huisman,W . (1983)Optimu m cereal combine harvester operation by means of automatic machine and threshing speed control.Doctora l thesis, Agricultural University,Wageningen . (xx+ 293p. , 156 figs,4 6 tables, 132 refs, app.,Eng . and Dutch summaries) The method bywhic h automation of agricultural machinery can be developed isillustrate d in the case of cereal combineharvesting . The controlled variables are machine forward speed and threshing cylinder peripheral speed. Four control systems have been developed that optimise these speeds on thebasi s of harvest costsminimisation ,whic h includes variable and fixed costs of the machine and those of machine- and timeliness losses. The evaluated systems make use of avaryin g number of input process variables and control the machine speed exclusively,o r both machine speed and threshing speed. The financial benefits from these control systems were calculated by means of a computer simulation. The research required in developing the models and control systems is discussed in detail.Th e simulation results demonstrate that control of low-frequency variations in croppropertie s brings some slightbenefi t and indicate that timeliness losses are of great importance to optimisation.
    [Show full text]
  • THRESHING FLOORS AS SACRED SPACES in the HEBREW BIBLE by Jaime L. Waters a Dissertation Submitted to the Johns Hopkins Universit
    THRESHING FLOORS AS SACRED SPACES IN THE HEBREW BIBLE by Jaime L. Waters A dissertation submitted to The Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland August 2013 © 2013 Jaime L. Waters All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Vital to an agrarian community’s survival, threshing floors are agricultural spaces where crops are threshed and winnowed. As an agrarian society, ancient Israel used threshing floors to perform these necessary activities of food processing, but the Hebrew Bible includes very few references to these actions happening on threshing floors. Instead, several cultic activities including mourning rites, divination rituals, cultic processions, and sacrifices occur on these agricultural spaces. Moreover, the Solomonic temple was built on a threshing floor. Though seemingly ordinary agricultural spaces, the Hebrew Bible situates a variety of extraordinary cultic activities on these locations. In examining references to threshing floors in the Hebrew Bible, this dissertation will show that these agricultural spaces are also sacred spaces connected to Yahweh. Three chapters will explore different aspects of this connection. Divine control of threshing floors will be demonstrated as Yahweh exhibits power to curse, bless, and save threshing floors from foreign attacks. Accessibility and divine manifestation of Yahweh will be demonstrated in passages that narrate cultic activities on threshing floors. Cultic laws will reveal the links between threshing floors, divine offerings and blessings. One chapter will also address the sociological features of threshing floors with particular attention given to the social actors involved in cultic activities and temple construction. By studying references to threshing floors as a collection, a research project that has not been done previously, the close relationship between threshing floors and the divine will be visible, and a more nuanced understanding of these spaces will be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • CARPETS! New Gas Stove
    SHADOWED FOR WEEKS. JACK, THE BOY MISSIONARY. AN INTERESTING CLOCK. Ttu-eshiuc In Syria. QEMI-ANNUAL REPORT of the SILK FROM THE SPIDER. On the outskirts of each village ia a O.ToHNSTOWN SAVINGS BANK, May 31, A Baby Who Survived the Peril, of Cen- Its Maker Is Proud of It,but He lias No level space of ground of sufficient Bize to 1 HBO. A tral to at Lut In Wish to Make Another. assiw. Book Market LITERARY MAN'S PECULIAR EXPERI- Africa IJlo London. answer the requirements of the village value. value. DIFFICULTIES IN THE WAV OF PRO- a on estate.... $ ENCE A tablet to the memory of Little Jack, In the window of German jeweler which is known the name Loans real e#3 $ 375,739 9.1 DURING HIS VACATION.. by of the ba- cash la hunks .. as was called, DUCING QUANTITIES. on street, SR.S/5 90 337.575 no | the boy missionary, he Court Brooklyn, there stands yader, or threshing floor. Each farmer Cash on hand J4.4HS M 14 fSH 34 children, erected by Sunday school was a brass clock not more than ten inches and peasant has his own particular por- U. S. 4-per-cont. boons., lmt.ooo on J40.7W) 00 Bo Hud Committed No Crime, but n De- unveiled over Ids grave in Loudon. Lit- Johnstown water Co. The Method of Englishman Named high. Tho passerby who looks through tion marked off by a row of stones, and bonds..... 1ir.,00000 115,000 00 tective Followed 11 iin All Around?He tle was an Westmoreland Jack only 7 years old when he the window sees under the clock, which this portion is religiously handed down A Cam- | Didn't Know of It Until Four Years died.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Harvesting Processing
    POST-HARVESTING PROCESSING Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations POST-HARVESTING PROCESSING 1.-Total post-harvest cereal system General information Each type of cereal requires a specific post-harvest treatment, however, there are certain general principles that apply to most of them. Cereals undergo a number of processing stages between harvest and consumption. This chain of processes is often referred to as the total post-harvest system. The post-harvest system can be split into three distinct areas. The first is the preparation of harvested grain for storage. The second, which is referred to as primary processing, involves further treatment of the grain to clean it, remove the husk or reduce the size. The products from primary processing are still not consumable. The third stage (secondary processing) transforms the grains into edible products. Primary processing involves several different processes, designed to clean, sort and remove the inedible fractions from the grains. Primary processing of cereals includes cleaning, grading, hulling, milling, pounding, grinding, tempering, parboiling, soaking, drying, sieving. Secondary processing of cereals (or 'adding value' to cereals) is the utilisation of the primary products (whole grains, flakes or flour) to make more interesting products and add variety to the diet. Secondary processing of cereals includes the following processes: fermentation, baking, puffing, flaking, frying and extrusion. Puffing. Puffed grains are often used as breakfast cereals or as snack food. During puffing, grains are exposed to a very high steam pressure which causes the grain to burst open. The puffed grains can be further processed by toasting, coating or mixing with other ingredients.
    [Show full text]
  • Threshing Idds Tanzania 2014 Project Abstract
    BEAN THRESHING IDDS TANZANIA 2014 PROJECT ABSTRACT CONTEXT BACKGROUND COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION 1 PROBLEM FRAMING STATEMENT PROJECT ABSTRACT The main objective of this project is to improve bean- threshing difficulties in the Mbulumbulu community in Tanzania. This project started with a four-day visit to the community where we identified different issues concerning bean threshing. During our visit we observed how bean threshing is done in the area, we tried threshing beans to know how it feels to do it and we asked them for reasons of threshing the way they do. We also conducted several interviews with members of the community and since they rely mainly on agriculture and beans are one the most profitable crops, there were a lot of identified issues concerning the bean threshing process, which include: back pain, expensive transportation, costly labour, production losses and difficult / time-consuming selection; all of which affects small-scale farmers’ profit. Due to these findings we decided to provide a solution that will help small-scale farmers increase their yield’s profit through a more efficient process. Therefore, we made different paper prototypes of a portable threshing machine and presented them to the community during our first visit. In our second visit, we went back with an incomplete prototype of a thresher and worked together with the community to finish it, which helped us get feedback necessary improvements that lead to the final prototypes. BEAN THRESHING IDDS 2014 TANZANIA CONTEXT BACKGROUND COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION Kambi ya Simba community in Mbulumbulu relies mostly on Within the hilly area to the west of Arusha, Tanzania lying within agriculture for both food and income.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture: a Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition
    Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition Updated June 16, 2005 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov 97-905 Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition Summary The complexities of federal farm and food programs have generated a unique vocabulary. Common understanding of these terms (new and old) is important to those involved in policymaking in this area. For this reason, the House Agriculture Committee requested that CRS prepare a glossary of agriculture and related terms (e.g., food programs, conservation, forestry, environmental protection, etc.). Besides defining terms and phrases with specialized meanings for agriculture, the glossary also identifies acronyms, abbreviations, agencies, programs, and laws related to agriculture that are of particular interest to the staff and Members of Congress. CRS is releasing it for general congressional use with the permission of the Committee. The approximately 2,500 entries in this glossary were selected in large part on the basis of Committee instructions and the informed judgment of numerous CRS experts. Time and resource constraints influenced how much and what was included. Many of the glossary explanations have been drawn from other published sources, including previous CRS glossaries, those published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and other federal agencies, and glossaries contained in the publications of various organizations, universities, and authors. In collecting these definitions, the compilers discovered that many terms have diverse specialized meanings in different professional settings. In this glossary, the definitions or explanations have been written to reflect their relevance to agriculture and recent changes in farm and food policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Agronomic Terms (Martin Et Al
    Glossary of Agronomic Terms (Martin et al. 1976) A Horizon The surface and subsurface soil that contains most of the organic matter and is subject to leaching. Abscission The natural separation of leaves, flowers, and fruits from the stems or other plant parts by the formation of a special layer of thin-walled cells. Acid soil A soil with a pH reaction of less than 7 (usually less than 6.6). An acid soil has a preponderance of hydrogen ions over hydroxyl ions. Litmus paper turns red in contact with most acid soils. Adventitious Arising from an unusual position on a stem or at the crown of a grass plant. Aerial roots Roots that arise from the stem above the ground. Aftermath The second or shorter growth of meadow plants in the same season after a hay or seed crop has been cut. Agrobiology A phase of the study of agronomy dealing with the relation of yield to the quantity of an added fertilizer element. Agronomy The science of crop production and soil management. The name is derived from the Greek words agros (field) and nomos (to manage). Aleurone The outer layer of cells of the endosperm of the seed. Alkali soil A soil, usually above pH 8.5, containing alkali salts in quantities that usually are deleterious to crop production. Alkaline soil A soil with a pH above 7, usually above pH 7.3. Ammonification The formation of ammonia or ammonium compounds in soils. Amylose The straight-chain fraction of normal starch. 106 Glossary of Agronomic terms Angiosperms The higher seed plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanish Agriculture: the Long Siesta, 1765-1965 Is the First Major Study in English of Spanish Agrarian History
    Spanish agriculture: the long Siesta, 1765-1965 is the first major study in English of Spanish agrarian history. James Simpson examines how traditional agriculture responded to population growth and the inte­ gration of commodity markets, emphasising both Spain's regional vari­ ations and its context in Europe. Simpson argues that decisive changes in farming techniques only occurred at the Start of this century~ leading n:!~i~~.2~J>.r:~dll_c~Vityand the start or,~~fl:I!lll~~og!;!LP~J.?l': ment ~_S)11!~!:£llJ>.!.~ULm_L~9l0~~d 1940~~_~n1~"E~"suming in the .• ~ 19508. He rejects arguments that slow giowtI1can be eJg?laiu!!ifTiY:tmor fes-OUJ:~~S or ineffiCIent farmers .. Indeed, farmerS were" quick to change when they had market opportunities (as was the case with olive oil, oranges and rice). By contrast, change was slower in those areas such as cereals where traditional technologies remained profitable. Simpson concludes that there were strict limits on absorbing labour in Spain's dry lands, and labour was retained in agriculture because of govern­ ment policies. Cambridge Studies in Modern Economic History 2 Spanish agriculture: the long Siesta, 1765-1965 Cambridge Studies in Modern Economic History Spanish agriculture: Series editors the long Siesta, Charles Feinstein 1 6 All Souls College, Oxford 1765- 9 5 Patrick O'Brien James Simpson The Institute of Historical Research, London Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Barry Supple The Leverhulme Trust Peter Temin Massachusetts Institute of Technology Gianni Toniolo Universita degli Studi di Venezia Cambridge Studies in Modern Economic History is a major n~ initiative in economic history publishing, and a flagship series f Cambridge University Press in an area of scholarly activity in whi, it has long been active.
    [Show full text]
  • The Losses in the Rice Harvest Process: a Review
    sustainability Review The Losses in the Rice Harvest Process: A Review Xue Qu 1,*, Daizo Kojima 1, Laping Wu 2 and Mitsuyoshi Ando 1 1 Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan; [email protected] (D.K.); [email protected] (M.A.) 2 College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, 17 Qinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: We review existing studies on rice harvest loss from the aspects of estimation methods, magnitudes, causes, effects, and interventions. The harvest losses examined occurred from the field reaping to storage processes, including threshing, winnowing, and field transportation. We find that existing studies on rice harvest losses have focused on quantitative losses in Asia and Africa. Lack of knowledge, inadequate harvesting techniques, poor infrastructure, and inefficient harvest management practices are considered critical contributors to the losses. The magnitudes and causes of rice harvest losses are now better understood than interventions, which have simply been presented but lack an assessment of the effects and a cost–benefit analysis. Interestingly, reduction in harvest losses may threaten some farmers’ profits, such as rural women who make their living from post-production manual operations. Considering the current status of the literature, future researchers should examine how to balance social and individual welfare since farmers are key stakeholders in intervention implementation. A good understanding of the existing researches can help clarify future efforts for loss reduction, thereby reducing the burden of increasing agricultural production and promoting sustainable development of resources and the environment.
    [Show full text]