DOCSLIB.ORG

ICOMOS New Zealandnews

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ICOMOS New Zealandnews ICOMOS New Zealand NEWS Te kawerongo hiko o te mana o nga pouwhenua o te ao 8 September 2010 ISSN 0113-2237 www.icomos.org.nz Softly does it in the city at risk COMOS NZ is urging the Christchurch City Council to take I particular care in assessing damage to its heritage buildings, following Saturday’s devastating earthquake and to learn from the lessons of the 2007 Gisborne earthquake where a number of damaged heritage buildings were demolished when expert advice could have saved them. ICOMOS New Zealand takes the view that engineering advice that is sympathetic to heritage values is important and that the top-ranked heritage buildings that have come through the quake with only moderate damage are testaments to good engineering interventions of the last decade or so. As the diggers move in to Christchurch streets, Dr Ian Lochhead, (left) a board member of ICOMOS and Associate Professor of architectural history at the University of Canterbury urges the earthquake cleanup authorities to seek advice before making decisions on the fates of buildings. “Many buildings that look in a grim state can, in fact, be saved. There should be no precipitous clearing or removal of heritage buildings or structures, and priority should be given to stabilisation, repair, and reconstruction.” He said “Christchurch has a rich Damage to the octagonal room makes it region. ICOMOS considers undue stock of architecturally significant the second time round for Cranmer haste to get back to normal should buildings. The city‟s built heritage is Square’s 1875 former Normal School, now not be allowed to compromise the Cranmer Court, which lost two towers an important part of the city‟s long-term objectives of repair and identity and attraction, and ICOMOS after an earthquake in 1928. Photo: Ann Devereaux reconstruction of heritage. urges owners of heritage places that have been damaged to undertake Ian Lochhead advises “Material that appropriate action and seek want anyone taking any pre- has fallen from buildings should also appropriate advice.” emptive action because they think be carefully assessed because what a building is unsafe. What we want initially appears to be rubble can ICOMOS is reassured by statements to do is protect those buildings as contain valuable, reusable material from the Christchurch City Council much as we can.” ICOMOS that, when reinstated, will help to Policy and Approvals manager, confirms this approach should be preserve the heritage value of Steve McCarthy who said “We don‟t followed throughout the affected damaged buildings.” So what does it mean if we put a comma after ‘reconstruction’? A moment for Crown Minerals Act - The discussion document also serious reflection for members of the notes that there will be further Charter Review Group. Schedule 4 investigations (not currently The government confirmed recently subject to section 4) in the that it no longer plans to remove Coromandel Peninsula, the Dun Charter approved - any land from Schedule 4 of the Mountain area, mesothermal Crown Minerals Act for the purposes gold areas in Otago, the thanks for the of further mineral exploration or Longwood complex and parts of extraction. Stewart Island. All these areas feedback! contain significant historic mining ICOMOS NZ made a submission to sites and/or pre-European stone he ICOMOS Board met last the Minister of Energy on this quarries or both. important issue, as the land Saturday in circumstances contained in Schedule 4 of the Act T memorable as much for the If there is to be a mitigation fund contains many archaeological sites, steady update of texts from quake- from mining royalties then it including many areas of historic gold ridden Christchurch as for the final needs to include cultural mining. approval of the revised ICOMOS heritage within its scope and New Zealand Charter. administered using appropriate ICOMOS made five key points: cultural heritage expertise. Following the June 2010 Board that there was no mention of the Charter approved - meeting the draft charter was importance of historic heritage in circulated to all ICOMOS members the discussion document issued inviting a final round of feedback on by the Ministry. the text. The Board sends its thanks all those who provided comments We were disappointed at the Annual2010 on the penultimate draft. lack of adequate consideration given in the discussion document The charter review group met on 21 to the existence of significant general September 2010, considered all the historic heritage in many of the comments of members and the areas mentioned for Schedule 4 Meeting changes proposed by them, and protection removal, particularly acted upon members‟ proposed on Te Ahumata Plateau (Great changes, making amendments to Barrier Island), the Coromandel Tauranga Peninsula and in the Inangahua the draft revised charter. Section (Paparoa National Park). The draft revised charter has now Friday 5 – Sunday 7 been approved by the Board and There was no mention in the November 2010 discussion document of the will be circulated to members and other key users shortly in PDF form. A protection mechanisms of the printed version and Maori translation RMA and HPA. Details follow will follow. ICOMOS NZ News September 2010 Page 2 Christchurch heritage@risk Above left and right: Damaged and scheduled for demolition is Christchurch’s first high rise, the Category I Manchester Courts, formerly the NZ Express Co building, (Alfred and Sidney Luttrell, 1905-6). Below: Damaged. The Category 1 Community of the Sacred Name in Barbados Street, (J.G. Collins, 1911-12, with earlier sections by B.W. and C.J. Mountfort), has sustained damage front and rear. Photos: Ann Devereaux ICOMOS NZ News September 2010 Page 3 Clockwise from top: Damage to the gable end of the 1905 nave extension, Holy Trinity, Avonside (Category I); detached facade, Empire Hotel, Lyttelton; the only fire- damaged building in the CBD in Worcester St; and one of the lucky ones in Hereford St. Photos: Ann Devereaux ICOMOS NZ News September 2010 Page 4 The original vegetation of the ring of mutual fear that fuelled the Cold islands was zones of mixed War. World Heritage News broadleaf forest of low stature with a climax forest of Neiosperma and The later thermonuclear (hydrogen Pisonia grandis (a very tall tree). bomb) blasts nearly blew a gap in Herbaceous plants such as some the perimeter reef that can be seen bunch grasses may have been in NASA photographs. dominant in dry interiors and in seabird colonies. About 10 species The ownership of the ships on the of seabird breed on the Marshall lagoon floor was transferred to „the Islands and seven pelagic roaming people of Bikini‟ under the Compact species pass through the area. of Free Association between the USA and the government of the Republic The land area of Bikini Island is of the Marshall Islands (RMI). abandoned land because of radiation risk and still has restricted The sunken fleet assemblages on the use. Its vegetation was largely lagoon floor will retain their symbolic destroyed by the thermonuclear an archaeological significance. On tests in 1954 but has since the world scene, apart from the recovered. Japanese fleet of support vessels sunk at Chuuk, there are other The events of Operation Crossroads sunken fleets, notably the WW I had high significance at the end of German fleet scuttled by German WW II and also in the opening crew after their surrender at Scapa Nuclear weapon test Romeo at Nam phases of the Cold War. Flow in the northern UK. Island, Bikini Atoll, 28 February 1954. Photo: U.S. Dept of Energy The target area in the Bikini lagoon is The people of the RMI and Bikini in about 5 km south-east of Bikini, a particular were removed from these small island about 5 km long and no islands so that the tests could Bikini Atoll and more than 1 km wide. proceed. Today they are determined that this aspect of the Australian Convict There were two atomic blasts: the imperial and Cold War programme first, Able, an air blast, and the represented at Bikini should not be Sites on the World second, Baker, underwater. From forgotten. The islands have also the US point of view they destroyed become an important symbol for Heritage List symbolic vessels of a defeated peace and anti-nuclear enemy and demonstrated the movements. Kevin L. Jones capability of atomic weapons against a substantial assemblage of naval vessels - equivalent to the fifth he 34th session of the World largest national fleet on the Heritage Committee meeting in international scene. T Brasilia has added Bikini Atoll and a serial list of 11 Australian The ships that are now sunk on the convict sites to the World Heritage lagoon floor following the tests of list. 1947-1954 were vessels of great symbolic importance in the naval Bikini Atoll history of WW II. In 1946, Bikini Atoll, the northernmost They include the battleship Nagato of the Ralik Chain, was the site of an (Japanese flagship for the attack on early series of atomic bomb tests Hyde Park Barracks Sydney Photo J. Bar Pearl Harbour in 1941), the USS named „Operation Crossroads‟. Bikini Saratoga an aircraft carrier and the Australian Convict sites is also the name of one particular USS Arkansas a battleship. The island nearest the site if the tests on German cruiser Prinz Eugen, Included in the Australian convicts the north-east of the atoll. damaged but not sunk by the sites listing are the following: bombing, was eventually towed to Kingston and Arthur`s Vale Historic An atoll is an irregularly ring-shaped Kwajalein and driven ashore there Area, Old Government House and reef with a chain of islands built up by a storm.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canterbury Conservation Management Strategy
    Canterbury Conservation Management Strategy Volume 1 Published by Department of Conservation/Te Papa Atawhai Private Bag 4715 Christchurch New Zealand First published 2000 Canterbury Conservation Management Planning Series No. 10 ISSN: 1171-5391-10 ISBN: 0-478-01991-2 Foreword Canterbury is rich in its variety of indigenous plants and animals, its historic heritage and relics, and its landscapes. Its physical features are dramatic, ranging from the majestic Southern Alps to the Canterbury Plains, from forested foothills to rocky coastlines and sandy beaches. These features also provide a wealth of recreational opportunities. The Department of Conservation’s Canterbury Conservancy is responsible for some 1293 units of land, and for the protection of important natural resources generally. To help manage these resources and activities the Conservancy, in consultation with the then North Canterbury and Aoraki Conservation Boards, has prepared a Conservation Management Strategy (CMS). The CMS sets out the management directions the Conservancy will take for the next ten years, the objectives it wants to achieve and the means by which it will achieve these. The draft CMS was released for public comment on 18 November 1995. Submissions closed on 1 April 1996, and 174 were received. Public oral submissions were heard in May and June of 1996. Consultation with Ngäi Tahu Papatipu Rünanga occurred from July to December 1996, and with Te Rünanga o Ngäi Tahu from July 1996 to May 1997. A summary of submissions and a decision schedule indicating the extent of acceptance of all submissions was prepared and given full consideration in revising the draft CMS. The revised draft CMS and summary of submissions was presented to the Conservation Boards for their consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Hlekiwe Kachali
    KEY ELEMENTS OF SECTORAL RECOVERY AND RESILIENCE AFTER THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES: A SYSTEM DYNAMICS APPROACH A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Civil and Natural Resources Engineering Department by Hlekiwe Kachali University of Canterbury 2013 Key elements of sectoral recovery and resilience after the Canterbury earthquakes: A system dynamics iii approach Hlekiwe Kachali Preface This work has come about through the contribution of many individuals and many events. I came to Christchurch, a few days before the 4 September 2010 earthquake, with a general idea of what my research would be. That changed on 4th September 2010 at 4:35am when greater Christchurch had the first in a series of earthquakes of MW 7.1. From a research perspective, the earthquakes brought about an invaluable research environment. However, for greater Christchurch, it was a sad moment. In Christchurch I have seen the power that nature holds and that nature can wield. As I write this, it feels good to know that whatever the setbacks, Christchurch is on the way to recovering. Cantabrians, whatever the circumstances they have lived through and because of that experience, are determined to define for themselves who they are and who they should be. iv Preface Key elements of sectoral recovery and resilience after the Canterbury earthquakes: A system dynamics v approach Hlekiwe Kachali Acknowledgements There are so many others who have contributed in so many ways to the completion of this thesis. Thank you. To my supervisors: Dr. Erica Seville, Associate Professor John Vargo and Professor David Elms.
    [Show full text]
  • 7707 Ashburton Glassworks
    7707 Ashburton Glassworks (Former) 8 Glassworks Road and Bremners Road ASHBURTON Ashburton District Council 270 Longbeach Station Homestead Longbeach Road ASHBURTON Ashburton District Council 284 Church of the Holy Name (Catholic) Sealey Street ASHBURTON Ashburton District Council 7593 Pipe Shed South Belt METHVEN Ashburton District Council 7753 Symonds Street Cemetery 72 Karangahape Road AUCKLAND Auckland City Council 94 Auckland War Memorial Museum 28 Domain Drive Auckland Domain AUCKLAND Auckland City Council 122 Cenotaph Domain Drive Auckland Domain AUCKLAND Auckland City Council 124 Domain Wintergardens Domain Drive Auckland Domain AUCKLAND Auckland City Council 4478 John Logan Campbell Monument 6 Campbell Cresent Epsom AUCKLAND Auckland City Council 2623 Clifton 11 Castle Drive Epsom AUCKLAND Auckland City Council 18 Highwic 40 Gillies Avenue Epsom AUCKLAND Auckland City Council 7276 Rocklands Hall 187 Gillies Avenue Epsom AUCKLAND Auckland City Council 4471 Auckland Grammar School (Main Block) 87 Mountain Road Epsom AUCKLAND Auckland City Council 4472 War Memorial, Auckland Grammar School 87 Mountain Road Epsom AUCKLAND Auckland City Council 116 St Andrew's Church (Anglican) 100 St Andrew's Road Epsom AUCKLAND Auckland City Council 7664 Auckland Municipal Destructor and Depot (Former) 210‐218 Victoria Street West and Union and Drake Streets Freemans Bay AUCKLAND Auckland City Council 98 Church of the Holy Sepulchre and Hall 71 Khyber Pass Road and Burleigh Street Grafton AUCKLAND Auckland City Council 5440 Cotswalds House 37 Wairakei
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Bibliography of Published Sources on Christchurch
    Local history resources An annotated bibliography of published sources on the history of Christchurch, Lyttelton, and Banks Peninsula. Map of Banks Peninsula showing principal surviving European and Maori place-names, 1927 From: Place-names of Banks Peninsula : a topographical history / by Johannes C. Andersen. Wellington [N.Z.] CCLMaps 536127 Introduction Local History Resources: an annotated bibliography of published sources on the history of Christchurch, Lyttelton and Banks Peninsula is based on material held in the Aotearoa New Zealand Centre (ANZC), Christchurch City Libraries. The classification numbers provided are those used in ANZC and may differ from those used elsewhere in the network. Unless otherwise stated, all the material listed is held in ANZC, but the pathfinder does include material held elsewhere in the network, including local history information files held in some community libraries. The material in the Aotearoa New Zealand Centre is for reference only. Additional copies of many of these works are available for borrowing through the network of libraries that comprise Christchurch City Libraries. Check the catalogue for the classification number used at your local library. Historical newspapers are held only in ANZC. To simplify the use of this pathfinder only author and title details and the publication date of the works have been given. Further bibliographic information can be obtained from the Library's catalogues. This document is accessible through the Christchurch City Libraries’ web site at https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/local-history-resources-bibliography/
    [Show full text]
  • Report on a Publicly Notified Resource Consent Application (Section 42A)
    Resource Management Act 1991 Report on a Publicly Notified Resource Consent Application (Section 42A) Application Reference: Land Use: RMA 92025955 Applicant: Majestic Church Site address: 350 Montreal Street Legal Description: Section 1206 Town of Christchurch Proposal: Mixed use church facility/residential development City Plan Zoning & Notations: Living 4C Submissions: 28 in support 31 in opposition 1 in opposition/neutral 1 which does not state a position (22 of these submitters seek to be heard) A list of the names, addresses of submitters is contained in Appendix One. Date of Hearing: 8 and 9 September 2014 Recommendation: Decline Preamble 1. My name is Erina Metcalf. I am employed as a Senior Planner and based in the Central Rebuild Offices of the Christchurch City Council. I have been employed by the Christchurch City Council since 2002. I hold a Masters Degree in Applied Science Resource Management from Lincoln University. I am eligible for membership of the New Zealand Planning Institute and have around 13 years of experience working in the planning and resource management field. 2. This report has been prepared with advice from the experts detailed below. A copy of their reports has been attached in the appendices. Officer Position Appendix Darran Humpheson (URS) Principal Acoustic Engineer Six Hannah Mirabueno Environmental Officer Seven Hugh Nicholson Principal Advisor Urban Nine Design Jennifer Dray Senior Landscape Architect Ten Lisa Speight CPTED Advisor Eleven Fiona Wykes Senior Heritage Advisor Twelve Mark Gregory Transport Network Planner Fourteen 3. This report reviews the application for resource consent and addresses the relevant information and issues raised. It should be emphasised that any conclusions reached or recommendations made in this report are not binding on the Commissioner.
    [Show full text]
  • Workbook Pages
    New Zealand Architecture (19th century to the present) Workbook Pages New Zealand Architecture (19th century to the present) What this is: Acknowledgements These pages are part of a framework for students studying The workbook was made possible: NCEA Level 2 Art History. It is by no means a definitive • by the suggestions of Art History students at Christchurch document, but a work in progress that is intended to sit Girls’ High School, alongside internet resources and Peter Shaw’s book A History • in consultation with Diane Dacre, of New Zealand Architecture, as well all the other things we • using the layout, photographic and printing skills of Chris normally do in class. Brodrick of Verve Digital, Christchurch As these pages were originally intended for use by • and the photographic skills of Gwyneth Hulse Christchurch students, a large proportion deals with Christchurch buildings. I particularly wish to thank Peter Shaw, the Estate of The illustrations on the following pages are not high quality Robin Morrison, Paul McCredie and publisher Hachette Livre in order to ensure faster downloading, but will still print NZ Ltd, Auckland (formerly Hodder Moa Beckett) and their adequately on most school printers. representative Caroline List, for permission to use material and How to use it: photographs from A History of New Zealand Architecture (3rd edition, 2003) All tasks and information are geared to the three external Achievement Standards. I have found that repeated use of the While every attempt has been made to acknowledge charts reinforces the skills required for the external standards other sources, many of the resources used in the workbook and gives students confidence in using the language.
    [Show full text]
  • Giovinazzi ECEE 21March 2018
    FOSTERING THE RESILIENCE OF HERITAGE BUILDINGS IN NEW ZEALAND: POTENTIALITIES OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS Sonia GIOVINAZZI1, Shannon ABELING2, Francisco GALVEZ2, Stacy VALLIS23, Tatiana GODED4, Nick HORSPOOL5, Elena CALANDRA6, Jason INGHAM7 ABSTRACT The 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence (CES) in New Zealand, and further recent earthquake events worldwide, has shown the invaluable loss that earthquakes can cause to architectural heritage. This paper explores the potentiality and the extent to which Decision Support Systems (DSSs) might have on informing the decision- making processes towards thriving the resilience of heritage buildings to natural hazards, with special focus on earthquakes. In particular, in the paper, reference is made to RiskScape, the New Zealand DSS platform for assessing the risks from natural hazards, where the possibility to assess the seismic vulnerability of heritage buildings and to prove the effectiveness of different mitigation options, at territorial scale, has been already embedded, as far as churches are concerned. The idea would be to include further add-ins to RiskScape to contribute towards an ambitious initiative aiming to enhance the seismic resilience of heritage buildings in New Zealand. In this paper, the idea to include in RiskScape, as a first step, a database to foster the awareness of stakeholders and communities on their Cultural Heritage at risk, is firstly discuss. The already embedded RiskScape add-in that allows performing scenario analysis at territorial scale to assess direct and indirect impacts is then illustrated. Finally, a further add-in that enables the analysis at single building level to identify the most likely collapse mechanisms is illustrated. This could support the identification of effective mitigation strategies pre-event and of emergency management and repair/reconstruction strategies, post-event.
    [Show full text]
  • The Demise of the URM Building Stock in Christchurch During the 2010- 2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence
    This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Moon, Lisa, Dizhur, Dmytro, Senaldi, Ilaria, Derakhshan, Hossein, Griffith, Michael, Magenes, Guido, & Ingham, Jason (2014) The demise of the URM building stock in Christchurch during the 2010- 2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence. Earthquake Spectra, 30(1), pp. 253-276. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/119501/ c Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. https://doi.org/10.1193/022113EQS044M 1 The Demise of the URM Building Stock in 2 Christchurch during the 2010 –2011 3 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence a) b) c) d) 4 Lisa Moon, Dmytro Dizhur, Ilaria Senaldi, Hossein Derakhshan, e) f ) g) 5 Michael Griffith, M.EERI, Guido Magenes, and Jason Ingham, M.EERI 6 The progressive damage and subsequent demolition of unreinforced masonry 7 (URM) buildings arising from the Canterbury earthquake sequence is reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Normal School
    THE ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE CHRISTCHURCH 1. The Normal School CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL TOW PLANNING DIVISION Preface Christchurch, unlike New Zealand's other main centres. has a charm that depends largely on features built or planned by man. The calm and dignity of the city owes much to its early buildings. and Christchurch's history can still be traced in the many examples that remain. Action by the New Zealand Historic Places Trust (Canterbury Regional Committee) and other public interest groups has. saved several important city buildings including the Provincial Government Buildings. Trinity Church, the Theatre Royal and the old University (now the Christchurch Arts Centre). Yet, as the city grows and changes, there is a continuing danger that historically or environmentally valuable buildings may be thoughtlessly or unnecessarily destroyed. The Christchurch City Council District Planning Scheme lists 190 historic buildings and objects, and provides opportunities and incentives for their retention, but although the scheme fosters a climate of preservation, it is, in the end, only the determination of the community which can effectively protect or revitalise those buildings it considers important. For this reason, a major aim of the present series of booklets is the identification and description of the city's most valuable historic buildings, in the hope that greater public awareness of their importance will contribute to their chances of survival. Even if preservation proves to be impossible in some cases, this series will gather together information, illustrations and analyses of each building to provide a published record of the rich architectural legacy inherited from previous generations. If these booklets encourage you to think about the historical'significance of this City's architecture, and if they heb clarify in your mind the special values of Christchurch's historic buildings, then they will have in part met their goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Survey of Residents 1998
    CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL ANNUAL SURVEY OF RESIDENTS 1998 PART 3 - OPEN-ENDED RESPONSES Contents Page No. List 1 Other reasons for visiting a Council library (Q3a & Q3b) ...................................... 1 List 2 Other reasons for not visiting a Council swimming pool (Q9)................................ 2 List 3 Reasons for dissatisfaction with facilities at Council stadiums (Q11e)................... 5 List 4 Other reasons for not visiting a Council stadium (Q11f)......................................... 6 List 5 Reasons for concern about litter in Christchurch parks (Q15b) .............................. 8 List 6 Activities that respondents would like to have taken part in but could not (Q21b) ................................................................................................. 25 List 7 Reasons for not being able to take part in all kinds of spare time activities or hobbies (Q22) ................................................................................................. 33 List 8 Other types of community-based activities been to or taken part in (Q23b) ......... 39 List 9 Other indoor places where activities were held (Q24)........................................... 40 List 10 Other outdoor places where activities were held (Q24)....................................... 43 List 11 Other reasons for using a private home instead of a community-based facility (Q25)....................................................................................................... 47 List 12 Other indoor places where activities were
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee Agenda
    PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY 8 MAY 2013 AT 9.15AM IN COMMITTEE ROOM 1, CIVIC OFFICES, 53 HEREFORD STREET Committee: Councillor Sue Wells (Chairperson), Councillors Peter Beck, Sally Buck, Jimmy Chen, Aaron Keown, Glenn Livingstone and Claudia Reid. Principal Adviser Committee Adviser Mike Theelen Megan Pearce Telephone: 941-8281 Telephone: 941-8140 PART A - MATTERS REQUIRING A COUNCIL DECISION PART B - REPORTS FOR INFORMATION PART C - DELEGATED DECISIONS INDEX ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. NO. PART C 1. APOLOGIES 3 PART B 2. DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT 3 PART A 3. LOCAL ALCOHOL POLICY 5 PART B 4. CONSENTING REBUILD MONTLY REPORT 249 PART A 5. PROPOSED POLICY CHANGE FOR FENCING OF SWIMMING POOLS 263 PART A 6. COUNCIL SUBMISSION ON MBIE CONSULTATION DOCUMENT ‘MAKING POOL 269 SAFETY EASIER” PART A 7. TEMPORARY ALCOHOL BAN IN RICCARTON/ILAM 2013 317 PART A 8. RELOCATION OF THE CHRISTCHURCH KART CLUB AND THE CANTERBURY 325 GREYHOUNDS PART A 9. JOINT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CERA, THE COUNCIL AND TE 341 RUNUNGA O NGĀI TAHU 3 PLANNING COMMITTEE 8. 5. 2013 1. APOLOGIES 2. DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT Inspector Richard Bruce on behalf of the New Zealand Police on item 3 Bob Manthei and Rosanna Winkelman on behalf of the Victoria Neighbourhood Association on item 3 Peter Morrison and Amy McLellan-Minty on behalf of Hospitality New Zealand on item 3 Representatives of the Canterbury District Health Board on item 3 Brett Giddens on item 3. 4 5 PLANNING COMMITTEE 8. 5. 2013 3. DRAFT LOCAL ALCOHOL POLICY General Manager responsible: General Manager Strategy and Planning, DDI 941-8281 Officer responsible: Strategic Policy Unit Manager, Strategy and Planning Group Author: Adair Bruorton, Senior Policy Analyst, Ruth Littlewood, Senior Policy Analyst, Siobhan Storey, Senior Policy Analyst PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the Journal of the New Zealand Institute of Architects
    Index to the Journal of the New Zealand Institute of Architects The journal of the NZIA was published under several titles (including Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute of Architects, Journal of the New Zealand Institute of Architects) NZIA Journal, New Zealand Architect, Architecture New Zealand) over the years and was not indexed anywhere in its early years. (More recently it has been selectively indexed in Index New Zealand.) Three Architecture Librarians at Victoria University of Wellington compiled an index of all the articles published in it from 1912- 1990. This index was published in 3 issues of the VUW School of Architecture’s Working Paper Series covering 1912-1980 (WP 13), 1981-1985 (WP23) and 1986-1990 (WP 25). Entries are arranged alphabetically by architect, building type/subject, place, author, and title. xx is used in some places to indicate ‘see’, referring the reader to an alternative heading for information. Victoria University of Wellington School of Architecture INDEX TO THE NEW ZEALAND ARCHITECT AND ARCHITECTURE NEW ZEALAND Julie Howarth and Kathryn Bolland A cumulative index from 1986 - 1990 inclusive, giving entries by architect, building typelsubject, place, and author. Supplement to WP13 : BROOKES, Susan. Index to the Journal of the New Zealand Institute of Architects 1912 -1980, and WP23 : BOLLAND, Kathryn and BROOKES, Susan. Index to the New Zealand Architect 1981 - 1985. WORKING PAPER 25 ISBN 0-475-10082-4 ISSN 0110-7399 SCHOOL OF ARCHITE- PUBLICATIONS feature research and working papers on academic and professional issues INTRODUCTION In 1982 and 1986, cumulative indexes to the journal of the New Zealand Institute of Architects (under its many variations in name) were published as Working Paper WP82-13 and WP 23, respectively.
    [Show full text]