Premises and Motifs in Renaissance Thought and Literature

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Premises and Motifs in Renaissance Thought and Literature Premises and Motifs in Renaissance Thought and Literature Premises and Motifs in Renaissance Thought and Literature % C. A. Patrides PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY Copyright © 1982 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, Guildford, Surrey ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data will be found on the last printed page of this book This book has been composed in Linotron Garamond Clothbound editions of Princeton University Press books are printed on acid-free paper, and binding materials are chosen for strength and durability Printed in the United States of America by Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey for Dimitri Vournas Contents To the Reader xi Abbreviations xvii 1. "Quaterniond into their celestiall Princedoms": The Orders of the Angels 3 2. "Ascending by degrees magnificent": Connections Between Heaven and Earth 31 3. "The exact compute of time": Estimates of the Year of Creation 52 4. "Those mysterious things they observe in numbers": Approaches to Numerology 64 5. "With his face towards Heaven": The Upright Form of Man 83 6. "The first promise made to man": The Edenic Origins of Protestantism 90 7. "That great and indisputable miracle": The Cessation of the Oracles 105 8. "The beast with many heads": Views on the Multitude 124 9. "The bloody and cruell Turke": The Judgments of God in History 137 vii Contents 10. "A palpable hieroglyphick": The Fable of Pope Joan 152 11. "A horror beyond our expression": The Dimensions of Hell 182 12. "A Principle of infinite Love": The Salvation of Satan 200 Index nominum 219 Index rerum 235 Illustrations [between pp. 162 and 163] 1. The papal line of succession: Sergius II, Leo IV, and John VII with her child. From the Nuremberg Chronicle compiled by Hartmann Schedel: Registrum huius ope- ris libri cronicarum (Nuremberg, 1493), fbl. I69v. 2. Pope Joan giving birth to her son. From the Ger­ man version of Boccaccio's De claris mulieribus: Der kurcz sin von etlichen frowen (Ulm, 1473), fol. 134. 3. A Protestant adaptation of the previous illustration. From the title page of "H.S.," lesvitas, Pontificvm, Romanorvm missarios, falso et frvstra negare Papam loannem VllL fvisse mvlierem (n.p., 1588). 4. Pope Joan at the moment of revelation. From an adaptation of a tract by Alexander Cooke, A Present for a Papist: or the Life and Death of Pope Joan (1675), opposite the title page. 5. The sedes stercorata. From Jean Chifflet, Ivdicivm de fabvla loannce Papissce (Amsterdam, 1666), p. 7. 6. Pope Joan enthroned. From the French version of Friedrich Spanheim's De Papa foemina: Histoire de la papesseJeanne (Cologne, 1694), opposite the title page. To the Reader . there is in this Universe a Staire, or manifest Scale of creatures, rising not disorderly, or in confusion, but with a comely method and proportion.—Sir Thomas Browne The twelve studies made available here address them­ selves to as many dimensions of Renaissance thought and expression in order to provide a comprehensive vision of the Renaissance at large. Variable though these studies are in their length and in their range, they converge on that pattern which, attested among others by Sir Thomas Browne in Reltgio Medici (I, 33) and by Milton in Par­ adise Lost (V, 469-90), sustains the period's tendency emotively to apprehend the created order as a hierarchi­ cal arrangement ascending "from the Mushrome to the Angels" (below, Ch. I, §3). This vertical arrangement was additionally regarded as conflated with the horizon­ tal process along a linear path extending from the Cre­ ation to the Last Judgment. Jointly regarded, these di­ mensions were intended to assert—in Browne's words— "a comely method and proportion." Such claims are writ large in the present work, espe­ cially in the course of the initial two prospects of cosmic order (Ch. I-II) and the concluding two visions of the Xl To the Reader dolorous realm (Ch. XI-XII). But the other studies up­ hold "proportion" no less firmly, however diverse the given premises and expansive their consequent effects. Thus the estimates of the year of creation (Ch. III) and the speculations involving numbers (Ch. IV) alike sug­ gest efforts to impose order in particular ways; the cel­ ebration of man's upright form (Ch. V) affirms the dig­ nity of the major link in the cosmic hierarchy; the attempt to posit Protestantism's Edenic antecedents (Ch. VI) ar­ gues yet again the predilection for "first principles"; while the remaining four studies focus on specific manifesta­ tions of order as well as disorder in the horizontal plane of history: the cessation of the oracles on the appearance of Christ (Ch. VII), the cumulative renunciations of the multitude (Ch. VIII), the providential design behind Ottoman aggression (Ch. IX), and the mystery of God's ways apropos the legendary Pope Joan (Ch. X). Here and there, it must be acknowledged, I attend to but a minute portion of the seething cauldron that was the Renaissance; but I would all the same maintain that, not infrequently, the fervency of the whole can best be appreciated by the intensity of the part. Moreover, where my peregrinations end with a glance beyond the Renais­ sance, the tactic should not be regarded as strictly for­ tuitous. It is on the contrary designed to suggest the nature of the changes effected during the transition from a predominantly theological orientation to a largely sec­ ular one. My concern was after all to annotate certain developments in terms both of their background in our cultural heritage and of their foreground in our com­ monly shared literature. All but one of these studies have been published be­ fore; but in their transit into these pages, it should be To the Reader emphasized, they were far more thoroughly documented in all cases but two. In their initial state, they were indispensable in providing a background for two books I completed in 1966 and 1972 respectively;1 but since then I also realized that they constituted an entity unto themselves, especially once I recast their arguments and revised their style. I am in consequence grateful to the editors of the following journals for their generous per­ mission to reprint, in the revised form mentioned, the studies indicated: Harvard Theological Review (for Ch. XI: Copyright 1964 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College), Huntington Library Quarterly (Ch. Ill), Isis (Ch. IV), Journal of the History of Ideas (Ch. I, V, and XII), Modern Language Review (Ch. VII), Shakespeare Quarterly (Ch. VIII), Studies in the Renaissance (Ch. IX), Studies in English Literature (Ch. VI), and Theologische Zeitschrift (Ch. II). At different times and in different versions, most of the ensuing studies were delivered as lectures before learned societies or at select universities. Of those occa­ sions, one in particular deserves to be mentioned because it involved an enterprise I happen to favor (Ch. X), de­ livered as the Erasmus Lecture for 1981 at Victoria University in the University of Toronto. I am only too pleased to acknowledge the warm hospitality extended to me by ProfessorJames M. Estes, Director of the Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies, and the pa­ tience with which numerous details were attended to by Professor Germaine Warkentin. My good friend Douglas 1 Milton and the Christian Tradition (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1966; reprinted by Archon Books, Hamden, Conn., 1979) and "The Grand Design of God": The Literary Form of the Christian View of History (London: Rou- tledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., and Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1972). To the Reader Chambers provided as always the ideal context for the transformation of a formal occasion into a decidedly con­ genial visit. The slow evolution of the studies that follow until they assumed their present form has involved the gen­ erous assistance I have obtained from a considerable number of individuals and institutions. Impossible as it is to name them all, I must necessarily restrict the expression of my gratitude in the first instance to Pro­ fessor Philip Brockbank, Director of The Shakespeare Institute at the University of Birmingham, who encour­ aged my labors during the fourteen years I was fortunate to be with him at the University of York, and to Pro­ fessor Roland Mushat Frye of the University of Pennsyl­ vania, who sustained me over twenty years with his warm friendship and sage counsel. Additionally, I am grateful to Mr. C.B.L. Barr of the York Minster Library, who has given me the benefit of his vast knowledge of clas­ sical literature and scholarship, and to Professor Ray­ mond B. Waddington of the University of Wisconsin at Madison, who has suggested several important changes in my argument and my documentation. As most of my investigations into primary sources were undertaken at the British Library and the Bodleian Library, it gives me great pleasure gratefully to acknowl­ edge the manifold courtesies extended to me at both. The Trustees of the British Library, it should be added, also granted me permission to reproduce the six plates appearing in this volume. I am no less obligated to still other libraries where my research encompassed secondary sources, notably the New York Public Library and the libraries of the University of California at Berkeley, the University of York, and the University of Michigan at To the Reader Ann Arbor. All three of the last named universities have in addition provided me with indispensable subsidies in the form of both travel grants and clerical assistance. When all is said, however, I am particularly grateful to the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation for the award of two fellowships, without which the present work—and much else besides—could not possibly have been realized.
Recommended publications
  • Notes on the Parish of Mylor, Cornwall
    C.i i ^v /- NOTES ON THE PARISH OF MYLOR /v\. (crt MVI.OK CII r RCII. -SO UIH I'OKCil AND CROSS O !• ST. MlLoKIS. [NOTES ON THE PARISH OF MYLOR CORNWALL. BY HUGH P. OLIVEY M.R.C.S. Uaunton BARNICOTT &- PEARCE, ATHEN^UM PRESS 1907 BARNICOTT AND PEARCE PRINTERS Preface. T is usual to write something as a preface, and this generally appears to be to make some excuse for having written at all. In a pre- face to Tom Toole and his Friends — a very interesting book published a few years ago, by Mrs. Henry Sandford, in which the poets Coleridge and Wordsworth, together with the Wedgwoods and many other eminent men of that day figure,—the author says, on one occasion, when surrounded by old letters, note books, etc., an old and faithful servant remon- " " strated with her thus : And what for ? she " demanded very emphatically. There's many a hundred dozen books already as nobody ever reads." Her hook certainly justified her efforts, and needed no excuse. But what shall I say of this } What for do 1 launch this little book, which only refers to the parish ot Mylor ^ vi Preface. The great majority of us are convinced that the county of our birth is the best part of Eng- land, and if we are folk country-born, that our parish is the most favoured spot in it. With something of this idea prompting me, I have en- deavoured to look up all available information and documents, and elaborate such by personal recollections and by reference to authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • I 'A MAN MOSTE MEETE': a NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF
    'A MAN MOSTE MEETE': A NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF JUSTICES OF THE PEACE IN MID-TUDOR ENGLAND, 1547-1582 _____________ A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History University of Houston _____________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _____________ By Clarissa Elisabeth Hinojosa May 2014 i 'A MAN MOSTE MEETE': A NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF JUSTICES OF THE PEACE IN MID-TUDOR ENGLAND, 1547-1582 _____________ An Abstract of a Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History University of Houston _____________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _____________ By Clarissa Elisabeth Hinojosa May 2014 ii ABSTRACT This dissertation is a national study of English justices of the peace (JPs) in the mid- Tudor era. It incorporates comparable data from the reigns of Edward VI, Mary I, and the Elizabeth I. Much of the analysis is quantitative in nature: chapters compare the appointments of justices of the peace during the reigns of Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I, and reveal that purges of the commissions of the peace were far more common than is generally believed. Furthermore, purges appear to have been religiously- based, especially during the reign of Elizabeth I. There is a gap in the quantitative data beginning in 1569, only eleven years into Elizabeth I’s reign, which continues until 1584. In an effort to compensate for the loss of quantitative data, this dissertation analyzes a different primary source, William Lambarde’s guidebook for JPs, Eirenarcha. The fourth chapter makes particular use of Eirenarcha, exploring required duties both in and out of session, what technical and personal qualities were expected of JPs, and how well they lived up to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Page R.J. Pederson
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/22159 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Pederson, Randall James Title: Unity in diversity : English puritans and the puritan reformation, 1603-1689 Issue Date: 2013-11-07 Chapter 3 John Downame (1571-1652) 3.1 Introduction John Downame (or Downham) was one of the greatest exponents of the precisianist strain within Puritanism during the pre-revolutionary years of the seventeenth century, a prominent member of London Puritanism, and renowned casuist.1 His fame rests chiefly in his nineteen published works, most of which were works of practical divinity, such as his four-part magnum opus, The Christian Warfare (1604-18), and his A Guide to Godlynesse (1622), a shorter, though still copious, manual for Christian living. Downame was also known for his role in publishing two of the most popular theological manuals: Sir Henry Finch’s The Summe of Sacred Divinitie (1620), which consisted of a much more expanded version of Finch’s earlier Sacred Doctrine (1613), and Archbishop James Ussher’s A Body of Divinitie (1645), which was published from rough manuscripts and without Ussher’s consent, having been intended for private use.2 Downame also had a role in codifying the Westminster annotations on the Bible, being one of a few city ministers to work on the project, though he never sat at the Westminster Assembly.3 Downame’s older brother, 1 Various historians from the seventeenth century to the present have spelled Downame’s name differently (either Downame or Downham). The majority of seventeenth century printed works, however, use “Downame.” I here follow that practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Congregational History Society Magazine
    ISSN 9B?>–?;<> Congregational History Society Magazine Volume ? Number < Spring ;9:: ISSN 0965–6235 THE CONGREGATIONAL HISTORY SOCIETY MAGAZINE Volume E No B Spring A?@@ Contents Editorial 106 News and Views 106 Correspondence 107 The Hampton Court Conference, the King James Version 108 and the Separatists Alan Argent Locals and Cosmopolitans: Congregational Pastors 124 in Edwardian Hampshire Roger Ottewill The Evangelical Union Academy 138 W D McNaughton Reviews 144 Congregational History Society Magazine, Vol. 6, No 3, 2011 105 EDITORIAL In this issue Roger Ottewill conducts readers to Edwardian Hampshire to meet the county’s Congregational pastors, both local, cosmo-local and cosmopolitan (all terms he explains), among whom we find the influential Welsh wizard, J D Jones of Bournemouth, called “the arch-wangler of Nonconformity” by David Lloyd George, who knew a thing or two about wangling. We travel north of the border to study that understated contribution to Scottish Congregationalism, the Evangelical Union, explicitly through its academy. Lastly, like many others in 2011, we turn aside to mark the 400th anniversary of the King James Version of the Bible. In this magazine, our examination of this Jacobean masterpiece involves a consideration of its origins, amid the demands for further reform of the established church, and the growth of those forerunners of Congregationalism, the English separatists. NEWS AND VIEWS We were saddened to learn of the death of John Taylor, for many years the editor of the Transactions of the Congregational Historical Society and, after 1972, of its successor and our sister journal, the Journal of the United Reformed Church History Society .
    [Show full text]
  • EB WARD Diary
    THE DIARY OF SAMUEL WARD, A TRANSLATOR OF THE 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE Transcribed and prepared by Dr. M.M. Knappen, Professor of English History, University of Chicago. Edited by John W. Cowart Bluefish Books Cowart Communications Jacksonville, Florida www.bluefishbooks.info THE DIARY OF SAMUEL WARD, A TRANSLATOR OF THE 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE. Copyright © 2007 by John W. Cowart. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America by Lulu Press. Apart from reasonable fair use practices, no part of this book’s text may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. For information address Bluefish Books, 2805 Ernest St., Jacksonville, Florida, 32205. Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Publication Data has been applied for. Lulu Press # 1009823. Bluefish Books Cowart Communications Jacksonville, Florida www.bluefishbooks.info SAMUEL WARD 1572 — 1643 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION …………………………………..…. 1 THE TWO SAMUEL WARDS……………………. …... 13 SAMUEL WARD’S LISTIING IN THE DICTIONARY OF NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY…. …. 17 DR. M.M. KNAPPEN’S PREFACE ………. …………. 21 THE PURITAN CHARACTER IN THE DIARY. ….. 27 DR. KNAPPEN’S LIFE OF SAMUEL WARD …. …... 43 THE DIARY TEXT …………………………….……… 59 THE 1611 TRANSLATORS’ DEDICATION TO THE KING……………………………………….… 97 THE 1611 TRANSLATORS’ PREFACE TO BIBLE READERS ………………………………………….….. 101 BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………….…….. 129 INTRODUCTION by John W. Cowart amuel Ward, a moderate Puritan minister, lived from 1572 to S1643. His life spanned from the reign of Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, through that of King James. and into the days of Charles I. Surviving pages of Ward’s dated diary entries run from May 11, 1595, to July 1, 1632.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-18144-0 - Hobbes, Bramhall and the Politics of Liberty and Necessity: A Quarrel of the Civil Wars and Interregnum Nicholas D. Jackson Excerpt More information INTRODUCTION Historians may know that sometime in the seventeenth century the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes debated John Bramhall, Bishop of Derry. But where and what did they debate? And why did they debate the issues they did? It is not difficult to find brief descriptions or summaries of their public debate on free-will; this book provides the first comprehensive account not only of that debate, but also of their private quarrel and hostile relations during both the Wars of the Three Kingdoms and Interregnum. Hobbes and Bramhall argued about much more than ‘liberty’ and ‘necessity’ (free-will and determinism), and the following account offers a detailed historical expla- nation of their debating those and other issues. By situating their long and acrimonious, private and public, dispute within its contemporary context we may come to view the whole quarrel as a by-product or collateral intel- lectual skirmish of those rebellions and wars in the British Isles. We can also come to understand exactly what stakes they were playing for: what would a victory in the dispute mean to themselves, their friends and their audience? Although the clash of arms in their homeland was quite destructive, it was also productive of such contests of wit as the uncivil war of words between Hobbes and Bramhall that began across the Channel. In the summer of 1645, during the First English Civil War, Hobbes and Bramhall met in Paris, at the lodgings of their mutual acquaintance, the recently retired Cavalier general, the Marquess of Newcastle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic Episcopate
    THE HISTORIC EPISCOPATE By ROBERT ELLIS THOMPSON, M.A., S.T. D., LL.D. of THE PRESBYTERY of PHILADELPHIA PHILADELPHIA tEfce Wtstminmx pre** 1910 "3^70 Copyright, 1910, by The Trustees of The Presbyterian Board of Publication and Sabbath School Work Published May, 1910 <§;G!.A265282 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACADEMIC USAGE THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED TO THE PRESIDENT, FACULTY AND TRUSTEES OF MUHLENBERG COLLEGE IN GRATEFUL RECOGNITION OF HONORS CONFERRED PREFACE The subject of this book has engaged its author's attention at intervals for nearly half a century. The present time seems propitious for publishing it, in the hope of an irenic rather than a polemic effect. Our Lord seems to be pressing on the minds of his people the duty of reconciliation with each other as brethren, and to be bringing about a harmony of feeling and of action, which is beyond our hopes. He is beating down high pretensions and sectarian prejudices, which have stood in the way of Christian reunion. It is in the belief that the claims made for what is called "the Historic Episcopate" have been, as Dr. Liddon admits, a chief obstacle to Christian unity, that I have undertaken to present the results of a long study of its history, in the hope that this will promote, not dissension, but harmony. If in any place I have spoken in what seems a polemic tone, let this be set down to the stress of discussion, and not to any lack of charity or respect for what was for centuries the church of my fathers, as it still is that of most of my kindred.
    [Show full text]
  • Episcopal Tombs in Early Modern England
    Jnl of Ecclesiastical History, Vol. 55, No. 4, October 2004. f 2004 Cambridge University Press 654 DOI: 10.1017/S0022046904001502 Printed in the United Kingdom Episcopal Tombs in Early Modern England by PETER SHERLOCK The Reformation simultaneously transformed the identity and role of bishops in the Church of England, and the function of monuments to the dead. This article considers the extent to which tombs of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century bishops represented a set of episcopal ideals distinct from those conveyed by the monuments of earlier bishops on the one hand and contemporary laity and clergy on the other. It argues that in death bishops were increasingly undifferentiated from other groups such as the gentry in the dress, posture, location and inscriptions of their monuments. As a result of the inherent tension between tradition and reform which surrounded both bishops and tombs, episcopal monuments were unsuccessful as a means of enhancing the status or preserving the memory and teachings of their subjects in the wake of the Reformation. etween 1400 and 1700, some 466 bishops held office in England and Wales, for anything from a few months to several decades.1 The B majority died peacefully in their beds, some fading into relative obscurity. Others, such as Richard Scrope, Thomas Cranmer and William Laud, were executed for treason or burned for heresy in one reign yet became revered as saints, heroes or martyrs in another. Throughout these three centuries bishops played key roles in the politics of both Church and PRO=Public Record Office; TNA=The National Archives I would like to thank Craig D’Alton, Felicity Heal, Clive Holmes, Ralph Houlbrooke, Judith Maltby, Keith Thomas and the anonymous reader for this JOURNAL for their comments on this article.
    [Show full text]
  • The Percival J. Baldwin Puritan Collection
    The Percival J. Baldwin Puritan Collection Accessing the Collection: 1. Anyone wishing to use this collection for research purposes should complete a “Request for Restricted Materials” form which is available at the Circulation desk in the Library. 2. The materials may not be taken from the Library. 3. Only pencils and paper may be used while consulting the collection. 4. Photocopying and tracing of the materials are not permitted. Classification Books are arranged by author, then title. There will usually be four elements in the call number: the name of the collection, a cutter number for the author, a cutter number for the title, and the date. Where there is no author, the cutter will be A0 to indicate this, to keep filing in order. Other irregularities are demonstrated in examples which follow. BldwnA <-- name of collection H683 <-- cutter for author O976 <-- cutter for title 1835 <-- date of publication Example. A book by the author Thomas Boston, 1677-1732, entitled, Human nature in its fourfold state, published in 1812. BldwnA B677 <-- cutter for author H852 <-- cutter for title 1812 <-- date of publication Variations in classification scheme for Baldwin Puritan collection Anonymous works: BldwnA A0 <---- Indicates no author G363 <---- Indicates title 1576 <---- Date Bibles: BldwnA B524 <---- Bible G363 <---- Geneva 1576 <---- Date Biographies: BldwnA H683 <---- cuttered on subject's name Z5 <---- Z5 indicates biography R633Li <---- cuttered on author's name, 1863 then first two letters of title Letters: BldwnA H683 <----- cuttered
    [Show full text]
  • Title Page R.J. Pederson
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/22159 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Pederson, Randall James Title: Unity in diversity : English puritans and the puritan reformation, 1603-1689 Issue Date: 2013-11-07 UNITY IN DIVERSITY: ENGLISH PURITANS AND THE PURITAN REFORMATION 1603-1689 Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof. mr. Carel Stolker volgens besluit van het College voor promoties te verdedigen op 7 November 2013 klokke 15:00 uur door Randall James Pederson geboren te Everett, Washington, USA in 1975 Promotiecommissie Promotores: Prof. dr. Gijsbert van den Brink Prof. dr. Richard Alfred Muller, Calvin Theological Seminary, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA Leden: Prof. dr. Ernestine van der Wall Dr. Jan Wim Buisman Prof. dr. Henk van den Belt Prof. dr. Willem op’t Hof Dr. Willem van Vlastuin Contents Part I: Historical Method and Background Chapter One: Historiographical Introduction, Methodology, Hypothesis, and Structure ............. 1 1.1 Another Book on English Puritanism? Historiographical Justification .................. 1 1.2 Methodology, Hypothesis, and Structure ...................................................................... 20 1.2.1 Narrative and Metanarrative .............................................................................. 25 1.2.2 Structure ................................................................................................................... 31 1.3 Summary ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Elizabethan Protestant Press: a Study of the Printing and Publishing of Protestant Literature in English
    THE ELIZABETHAN PROTESTANT PRESS: A STUDY OF THE PRINTING AND PUBLISHING OF PROTESTANT RELIGIOUS LITERATURE IN ENGLISH, EXCLUDING BIBLES AND LITURGIES, 1558-1603. By WILLIAN CALDERWOOD, M.A., B.D. Submitted for the Ph.D. degree, University College. (c\ (LONBI 2 ABSTRACT Uninterrupted for forty-five years, from 1558 to 1603, Protestants in England were able to use the printing press to disseminate Protestant ideology. It was a period long enough for Protestantism to root itself deeply in the life of the nation and to accumulate its own distinctive literature. English Protestantism, like an inf ant vulnerable to the whim of a parent under King Henry VIII, like a headstrong and erratic child in Edward's reign, and like a sulking, chastised youth in the Marian years, had come of age by the end of the Elizabethan period. At the outset of Elizabeth's reign the most pressing religious need was a clear, well-reasoned defence of the Church of England. The publication of Bishop Jewel's Apologia Ecclesiae Anglicanae in 1562 was a response to that need and set the tone of literary polemics for the rest of the period. It was a time of muscle- flexing for the Elizabethan Church, and especially in the opening decades, a time when anti-Catholicism was particularly vehement. Consistently throughout the period, when Queen and country were threatened by Catholic intrigues and conspiracies, literature of exceptional virulence was published against Catholicism. But just as the press became an effective tool for defenders and apologists of the Church of England, it soon was being used as an instrument to advance the cause of further reform by more radical Protestants.
    [Show full text]
  • Settling the London Tithe Debates
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Morrison, Stuart (2018) Print, Debate and the Public Sphere in the London Tithes Cause, c.1600-1650. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent,. DOI Link to record in KAR http://kar.kent.ac.uk/68978/ Document Version Publisher pdf Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html PRINT, DEBATE AND THE PUBLIC SPHERE IN THE LONDON TITHES CAUSE, C.1600-1650 For Books are not absolutely dead things, but doe contain a potencie of life in them to be as active as the soule was whose progeny they are John Milton, Areopagitica (London: [s. n.], 1644), p. 4. Presented to the Centre for Medieval and Early Modern Studies at the University of Kent, in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]