DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 3 Chronology of Analytic Philosophy and Its Historiography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

King’s Research Portal Document Version Other version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Beaney, M. A. (2013). Chronology of Analytic Philosophy and its Historiography. In M. Beaney (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy (pp. 61–140). [3] (Oxford Handbooks). Oxford University Press. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 In Michael Beaney, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 61–140 Chapter 3 Chronology of Analytic Philosophy and its Historiography Michael Beaney This chronology condenses as much information as possible in as succinct a form as possible in 25,000 words about the key thinkers, publications, and events in the history of analytic philosophy and its historiography. Under each year, the entries are ordered as follows: publications [in black]; events [in green]; births and deaths [in blue and red, respectively]. The aim is to show something not only of the ‘internal’ history of analytic philosophy but also of the wider philosophical context in which analytic philosophy developed. So selected publications and events of related philosophical traditions, such as neo-Kantianism, pragmatism, and phenomenology, as well as relevant scientific texts, are also included (indicated in shaded lines). The entries are by no means limited to just this, but 150 philosophers and other thinkers have been selected for particular coverage – with dates of births, deaths, and key events and publications. Of these 150, 100 are either generally recognized as analytic philosophers or closely connected with the analytic tradition, such as certain mathematicians and pragmatists, and the other 50 are generally recognized as not analytic philosophers (indicated in shaded lines). For the record, these 150 are noted in the following table, together with works of reference where further information about their life and work can be found: Thinker Dates Accounts of life and work, biographies, chronologies Ajdukiewicz, 1890–1963 Sinisi & Woleński 1995 Kazimierz Alexander, Samuel 1859–1938 Stout 1940a, 1940b; Slater 2006 Anderson, John 1893–1962 Baker 1986; Weblin 2006 Anscombe, G. E. M. 1919–2001 Müller 2001; Teichman 2001; Diamond 2006; Driver 2009 Armstrong, David 1926– Jackson 2001 Austin, J. L. 1911–60 Fann 1969; Warnock 1969, 1989; Berlin et al. 1973; Searle 2001; Cave 2006a Ayer, A. J. 1910–89 Ayer 1977, 1985, 1992; Foster 1985; Ayer & Honderich 1991; Hahn 1992; Rogers 1999; Sprigge 2001; Hunter 2006a; Macdonald 2010 Bergmann, Gustav 1906–87 Gram & Klemke 1974; Addis 2005; Anellis 2005a Bergson, Henri 1859–1941 Lawlor & Moulard 2011 Berlin, Isaiah 1909–97 Ignatieff 1998; Cherniss 2006; Cherniss & Hardy 2010 Black, Max 1909–88 Schrader 2005 Boltzmann, Ludwig 1844–1906 Blackmore 1995 Bolzano, Bernard 1781–1848 Morscher 2007 Boole, George 1815–64 MacHale 1985; Gasser 2006; Burris 2010 Bradley, F. H. 1846–1924 Ferreira 2006; Candlish & Basile 2009 Braithwaite, R. B. 1900–90 Cave 2006 Brandom, Robert B. 1950– Weiss & Wanderer 2010 Brentano, Franz 1838–1917 Jacquette 2004; Huemer 2010 Broad, C. D. 1887–1971 Broad 1959; Schilpp 1959; Britton 1978; van Cleve 2001; Seager 2006; Gustavsson 2010 Brouwer, L. E. J. 1881–1966 van Atten 2011 2 Burge, Tyler 1946– Hahn & Ramberg 2003 Cantor, Georg 1845–1918 Dauben 1979; Hallett 1984 Carnap, Rudolf 1891–1970 Carnap 1963; Schilpp 1963; Hintikka 1975; Sarkar 2001; Carus 2005, 2007; Friedman & Creath 2007 Case, Thomas 1844–1925 Marion 2006a Cassirer, Ernst 1874–1945 Gawronsky 1949; Schilpp 1949a; T. Cassirer 2003; Friedman 2011 Cavell, Stanley 1926– Eldridge 2003; Brino-Dean 2005; Cavell 2010 Chisholm, Roderick 1916–99 Chisholm 1997; Hahn 1997b; Foyer & Zimmerman 2001; Feldman 2005; Feldman & Feldman 2008 Chomsky, Noam 1928– Barsky 1997; Ludlow 2001; McGilvray 2005; Szabó 2005 Church, Alonzo 1903–95 Manzano 1997; Anderson 2001; Drucker 2005; Enderton forthcoming Collingwood, R. G. 1889–1943 Collingwood 1939; Boucher 2006; Inglis 2009; D’Oro & Connelly 2010; Boucher & Smith 2013 Darwin, Charles 1809–82 Browne 1995, 2000 Davidson, Donald 1917–2003 Davidson 1999; Hahn 1999; Lepore 2001, 2005a; Malpas 2009 Dedekind, Richard 1831–1916 Reck 2008 Deleuze, Gilles 1925–95 Smith & Protevi 2008 Dennett, Daniel 1942– Ross et al. 2000; Viger 2005a Derrida, Jacques 1930–2004 Peeters 2010; Lawlor 2011 Dewey, John 1859–1952 Dewey 1939; Hook 1939; Schilpp 1939; Dykhuizen 1973; Eldridge 2005 Dilthey, Wilhelm 1833–1911 Makkreel 2008 Dreben, Burton 1927–99 Gibson 2005 Duhem, Pierre 1861–1916 Martin 1991 Dummett, Michael 1925–2011 Green 2001; Miller 2001; Weiss 2002; Auxier & Hahn 2007; Dummett 2007 Einstein, Albert 1879–1955 Einstein 1949; Schilpp 1949b; Clark 1971 Engels, Friedrich 1820–95 Carver 1989 Evans, Gareth 1946–80 Mandik 2006 Feigl, Herbert 1902–88 Feyerabend 1966; Aune 1998; Reisch 2005b Feyerabend, Paul 1924–93 Feyerabend 1995; Oberheim 2005; Preston 2009 Fodor, Jerry 1935– Rey 2001; Viger 2005b Foot, Philippa 1920–2010 Lawrence 2001; Hoy 2005; Kirchin 2006 Foucault, Michel 1926–84 Gutting 2008 Frege, Gottlob 1848–1925 Dummett 2001; Kreiser 2001; Thiel & Beaney 2005 Freud, Sigmund 1856–1939 Gay 1988 Gadamer, Hans- 1900–2002 Gadamer 1997; Hahn 1997a; Grondin 2003; Malpas 2009b Georg Geach, Peter T. 1916– Lewis 1991, 2006 Gödel, Kurt 1906–78 Dawson 1997; Anderson 2001; Parsons 2005; Kennedy 2011 Goodman, Nelson 1906–98 Scheffler 2001 Green, T. H. 1836–82 Tyler 2006, 2011 Grice, H. Paul 1913–88 Neale 2001; Stainton 2005; Grandy & Warner 2006; Hogan 2006 Habermas, Jürgen 1929– Wiggershaus 2004; Bohman & Rehg 2011 Hägerström, Axel 1868–1939 Mindus 2009 Hare, R. M. 1919–2002 Sinnott-Armstrong 2001; Pybus 2006 Hart, H. L. A. 1907–92 Shapiro 2001; Lacey 2004; Brooks 2006 Hegel, G. W. F. 1770–1831 Pinkard 2000; Redding 2010 Heidegger, Martin 1889–1976 Guignon 1993; Wheeler 2011 Helmholtz, 1821–94 Königsberger 1902-3; Patton 2010 Hermann von Hempel, Carl G. 1905–97 Kitcher 2001; Reisch 2005c 3 Herbart, Johann 1776–1841 Asmus 1968/1970 Hertz, Heinrich 1857–94 Fölsing 1997; Baird et al. 1998; Lützen 2005 Hilbert, David 1862–1943 Reid 1970 Hintikka, Jaakko 1929– Niiniluoto 2005; Hintikka 2006; Auxier & Hahn 2006 Hung, Tscha 1909–92 Cohen 1992; Dainian 1992 Husserl, Edmund 1859–1938 Smith & Smith 1995; Smith 2007; Beyer 2011 James, William 1842–1910 Myers 1986; Suckiel 2005; Goodman 2009 Joachim, Harold H. 1868–1938 Mander 2006b Kant, Immanuel 1724–1804 Kuehn 2001 Kim, Jaegwon 1934– Greco 2005 Kneale, William 1906–90 Smiley 1995, 2006 Kotarbiński, 1886–1981 Woleński 1990 Tadeusz Kripke, Saul 1940– Sosa 2001; Green 2005 Kuhn, Thomas S. 1922–96 Grandy 2001; Fuller 2005 Lakatos, Imre 1922–74 Wright 2006 Leśniewski, 1886–1939 Simons 2011 Stanisław Lewis, C. I. 1883–1964 Lewis 1968; Schilpp 1968; Murphey 2005; Colella 2005; Hunter 2007 Lewis, David 1941–2001 Stalnaker 2001; Hawthorne 2005; Weatherson 2009 Lotze, Hermann 1817–81 Sullivan 2010 Łukasiewicz, Jan 1878–1956 Woleński 1989 Mach, Ernst 1838–1916 Blackmore 1972; Wolters 2000; Pojman 2009 Mackie, John L. 1917–81 McDowell 1990; Sherratt 2006 Malcolm, Norman 1911–90 Ginet 2001; Blair 2005 Marcus, Ruth 1921–2012 Cresswell 2001, Garrett 2005; Marcus 2010 Barcan Marx, Karl 1818–83 Berlin 1939; McLellan 1973; Wolff 2010 McDowell, John 1942– Thornton 2006 McTaggart, J. M. E. 1866–1925 Armour 2006 Meinong, Alexius 1853–1920 Marek 2008 Merleau-Ponty, 1908–61 Flynn 2004 Maurice Mill, John Stuart 1806–73 Skorupski 1989; Capaldi 2004; Wilson 2007 Moore, G. E. 1873–1958 Moore 1942; Schilpp 1942; Baldwin 1990, 2004; Sosa 2001 Nagel, Ernest 1901–85 Suppes 1994; Anellis 2005b Neurath, Otto 1882–1945 Nemmeth & Stadler 1996; Cat 2010 Nietzsche, Friedrich 1844–1900 Wicks 2011b Peano, Giuseppe 1858–1932 Kennedy 1980 Peirce, Charles S. 1839–1914 Hookway 1985; Brent 1998; Misak 2004; de Waal 2005; Burch 2010 Perry, Ralph Barton 1876–1957 Papas 2005 Plantinga, Alvin 1932– Plantinga 1985; Tomberlin & van Inwagen 1985; Sennett 2005 Poincaré, Henri 1854–1912 Gray 2012 Popper, Karl 1902–94 Popper 1974, 1976; Schilpp 1974; Hacohen 2000; Newton-Smith 2001 Price, Henry H. 1899–1984 Hunter 2006b Prichard, Harold A. 1871–1947 Stratton-Lake 2006a; Dancy 2010 Prior, Arthur N. 1914–69 Copeland 2006, 2007 Putnam, Hilary 1926– Heil 2001; Pihlström 2005; Auxier & Hahn 2013 Quine, W. V. 1908–2000 Quine 1985, 1986; Schilpp & Hahn 1986/1998; Føllesdal 2001; Hylton 2001b, 2007a, 2010; Lepore 2005b Ramsey, Frank P. 1903–30 Sahlin 1990; Armendt 2001; Cave 2006c 4 Rawls, John 1921–2002 Daniels 2001; Boettcher 2005; Pogge 2007 Reichenbach, Hans 1891–1953 Traiger 2005; Hoffmann 2007 Rickert, Heinrich 1863–1936 Faust 1927; Ollig 1998 Rorty, Richard 1931–2007 Williams 2001; Rumana 2005; Ramberg 2007; Gross 2008; Auxier & Hahn 2010; Rorty 2010 Ross, W.
Recommended publications
  • Peter Thomas Geach, 1916–2013

    Peter Thomas Geach, 1916–2013

    PETER GEACH Peter Thomas Geach 1916–2013 PETER GEACH was born on 29 March 1916 at 41, Royal Avenue, Chelsea. He was the son of George Hender Geach, a Cambridge graduate working in the Indian Educational Service (IES), who later taught philosophy at Lahore. George Geach was married to Eleonore Sgnonina, the daughter of a Polish civil engineer who had emigrated to England. The marriage was not a happy one: after a brief period in India Eleonore returned to England to give birth and never returned to her husband. Peter Geach’s first few years were spent in the house of his Polish grandparents in Cardiff, but at the age of four his father had him made the ward of a former nanny of his own, an elderly nonconformist lady named Miss Tarr. When Peter’s mother tried to visit him, Miss Tarr warned him that a dangerous mad woman was coming, so that he cowered away from her when she tried to embrace him. As she departed she threw a brick through a window, and from that point there was no further contact between mother and son. When he was eight years old he became a boarder at Llandaff Cathedral School. Soon afterwards his father was invalided out of the IES and took charge of his education. To the surprise of his Llandaff housemaster, Peter won a scholarship to Clifton College, Bristol. Geach père had learnt moral sciences at Trinity College Cambridge from Bertrand Russell and G. E. Moore, and he inducted his son into the delights of philosophy from an early age.
  • Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae

    BAS C. VAN FRAASSEN Curriculum Vitae Last updated 3/6/2019 I. Personal and Academic History .................................................................................................................... 1 List of Degrees Earned ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Title of Ph.D. Thesis ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Positions held ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Invited lectures and lecture series ........................................................................................................................................ 1 List of Honors, Prizes ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Research Grants .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Non-Academic Publications ................................................................................................................................................ 5 II. Professional Activities .................................................................................................................................
  • Hacker's Complaint

    Hacker's Complaint

    VOL. NO. JULY CONTENTS ARTICLES Intentionalism and the Imaginability of the Inverted Spectrum Eric Marcus Metaphysical Arguments against Ordinary Objects Amie L. Thomasson Kant’s Transcendental Strategy John J. Callanan True Emotions Mikko Salmela Wittgenstein and Strong Mathematical Verificationism Cyrus Panjvani DISCUSSIONS Hacker’s Complaint Scott Soames Are There Non-Existent Intentionalia? Alberto Voltolini CRITICAL STUDY The Sort of Creature You Are Anselm W. Müller BOOK REVIEWS BLACKWELL PUBLISHING FOR THE SCOTS PHILOSOPHICAL CLUB AND THE UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. , No. July ISSN – DISCUSSIONS HACKER’S COMPLAINT B S S My goal in writing ‘Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century’ was to identify and explain the most important achievements of analytic philosophy which every student of the subject should be aware of, as well as those of its failures from which we have the most to learn. I attempted to do this by constructing a history that was itself a piece of analytic philosophy in its emphasis on analysis, reconstruction and criticism of arguments. In rebutting Hacker’s critique of it, I explain how my goal shaped my selection of topics, with special reference to the ordinary language period. I correct his misrepresentations of my treatment of the philosophers of this period, I demonstrate his failure to grasp, or understand the significance of, the Kripkean necessary a posteriori, and I reveal the misconceptions in his criticism of my interpretation of the ‘Tractatus’. I I am grateful to the Editors for inviting me to reply to P.M.S. Hacker’s review in this journal of my Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century.1 I begin with his complaint about the materials I chose to discuss: In its selection of materials it is unrepresentative: significant figures are omitted and pivotal works are not discussed ..
  • Arthur Pap Archive I. Manuscripts and Typscripts I.1

    Arthur Pap Archive I. Manuscripts and Typscripts I.1

    Arthur Pap Archive Inventory of the „Nachlass“ of Arthur Pap at the Institute Vienna Circle, by Christoph Limbeck-Lilienau I. Manuscripts and Typscripts I.1 Pap „Absolute Motion and the Clock Paradox“ [1953], 34 p., A4, Typscript Box 1/Folder 1 “Are Physical Magnitudes Operally Definable?” 1959, Typscript with a few handwritten corrections, 19 p., A4, 9 carbon copies. Published in: Box 1/2 Abstract for: “Are Physical Magnitudes Operally Definable?” 1956, Typscript, 3 p., A4 Box 1/3 “Are Physical Magnitudes Operationally Definable?” 1959, Typscript, 19 p., A4, Typscript, Box 1/3 “Are Physical Magnitudes Operationally Definable?” 1959, Typscript, 19 p., A4, Typscript, 8 Copies Box 1/3 “Basic Propositions, Certainty, and Intersubjective Language” [1958], Typscript, 21 p., A4 Box 1/4 “Basic Propositions, Certainty, and Intersubjective Language” [1960], Typscript, marginal handwritten corrections, 21 p., A4 Box 1/4 “Belief and Natural-Language-Intentions” No Date, Typscript, 5 p., A4 (from “Manila Folder”) Box 1/4 Abstract for: “Belief and Proposition” No Date, Typscript, 1 p., A4 Box 1/ 4 “Comments on M. Scriven´s `Certain Weaknesses in the Deductive Model of Explanation´” [1955], 5 p., A4, Typscript, Copy, (Original in the letter of M. Scriven from May 9, 1955) Scriven´s Reply is “Reply to Pap General Points-Specific Points”. Box 1/ 4 Critical Comments on Paul Weiss´ “Real Possibility” No Date, 3 p., A4, Typescript Box 1/ 4 “Mr. O´Connor on Incompatibility” [1955 or later], 4 p., A4, Typescript Box 1/ 4 Criticism of Sellars´ “On the Logic of Complex particulars” (from a letter of July 28) No Date, Typscript, 3 p., A4 (from “Manila Folder”) Box 1/4 1 “The Dispensibility of Material Implication for Applied Logic” 1959, Typescript with handwritten additions, 13 p., A4 (Contains a letter of rejection by John Rawls, see Correspondence “Rawls” (No.
  • Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow*

    Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow*

    1 Metaphysics Today and Tomorrow* Raphaël Millière École normale supérieure, Paris – October 2011 Translated by Mark Ohm with the assistance of Leah Orth, Jon Cogburn, and Emily Beck Cogburn “By metaphysics, I do not mean those abstract considerations of certain imaginary properties, the principal use of which is to furnish the wherewithal for endless dispute to those who want to dispute. By this science I mean the general truths which can serve as principles for the particular sciences.” Malebranche Dialogues on Metaphysics and Religion 1. The interminable agony of metaphysics Throughout the twentieth century, numerous philosophers sounded the death knell of metaphysics. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Rudolf Carnap, Martin Heidegger, Gilbert Ryle, J. L. Austin, Jacques Derrida, Jürgen Habermas, Richard Rorty, and, henceforth, Hilary Putnam: a great many tutelary figures have extolled the rejection, the exceeding, the elimination, or the deconstruction of first philosophy. All these necrological chronicles do not have the same radiance, the same seriousness, nor the same motivations, but they all agree to dismiss the discipline, which in the past was considered “the queen of the sciences”, with a violence at times comparable to the prestige it commanded at the time of its impunity. Even today, certain philosophers hastily spread the tragic news with contempt for philosophical inquiry, as if its grave solemnity bestowed upon it some obviousness. Thus, Franco Volpi writes: ‘Grand metaphysics is dead!’ is the slogan which applies to the majority of contemporary philosophers, whether continentals or of analytic profession. They all treat metaphysics as a dead dog.1 In this way, the “path of modern thought” would declare itself vociferously “anti- metaphysical and finally post-metaphysical”.
  • The Gnosiology As Experience of the Resurrected Christ in the Liturgical Texts of the Pentecostarion

    The Gnosiology As Experience of the Resurrected Christ in the Liturgical Texts of the Pentecostarion

    The Gnosiology as experience of the Resurrected Christ in the liturgical texts of the Pentecostarion CONTENT INTRODUCTION 4 The motif for choosing the theme 4 The stage of the theme`s research 5 The used method 5 The purpose of the research 5 Terminological clarifications 6 CHAPTER I. THE PENTECOSTARION – THE HYMNOGRAPHICAL IMAGE OF 11 THE STATE OF RESURRECTION IN JESUS CHRIST 1.1. The Pentecostarion – the Church`s Book of Cult 11 1.2. The Pentecostarion – the Relation Dogma – Cult – Knowledge 24 1.2.1. The Cult, Favorable Environment for Spreading the Faith and for Knowing the Dogma 27 1.2.2. The Church`s Cult, Guardian of the Dogma Against Heresy 30 1.2.3. The Dogma, the Cult and the Spiritual Knowledge 33 1.3. The Pentecostarion – the Doxological Dimension of the Knowledge 36 CHAPTER II. THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL FUNDAMENTALS OF THE ORTHODOX 51 GNOSIOLOGY MIRRORED IN PENTECOSTARION 2.1. Revelation and Knowledge 51 2.2. Image and Likeness of the Power of the Man of Knowing God 63 2.2.1. The Falling into Sin and the Image Corrupted through Passions 67 2.2.2. The Renewal of the Engulfed by Passion Image 68 2.3. Person - Communion - Knowledge 75 CHAPTER III THE CHRISTOLOGICAL FUNDAMENTALS OF THE ORTHODOX 84 GNOSIOLOGY MIRRORED IN PENTECOSTARION 1 3.1. The Man`s Healing into Christ – Premise of the Knowledge 84 3.1.1. The Embodiment of the Son of God 84 3.1.1.1. Jesus Christ True God and True Man 90 3.1.1.2. The Deification of the Human Nature into Christ 91 3.1.1.3.
  • A Life of Thinking the Andersonian Tradition in Australian Philosophy a Chronological Bibliography

    A Life of Thinking the Andersonian Tradition in Australian Philosophy a Chronological Bibliography

    own. One of these, of the University Archive collections of Anderson material (2006) owes to the unstinting co-operation of of Archives staff: Julia Mant, Nyree Morrison, Tim Robinson and Anne Picot. I have further added material from other sources: bibliographical A Life of Thinking notes (most especially, James Franklin’s 2003 Corrupting the The Andersonian Tradition in Australian Philosophy Youth), internet searches, and compilations of Andersonian material such as may be found in Heraclitus, the pre-Heraclitus a chronological bibliography Libertarian Broadsheet, the post-Heraclitus Sydney Realist, and Mark Weblin’s JA and The Northern Line. The attempt to chronologically line up Anderson’s own work against the work of James Packer others showing some greater or lesser interest in it, seems to me a necessary move to contextualise not only Anderson himself, but Australian philosophy and politics in the twentieth century and beyond—and perhaps, more broadly still, a realist tradition that Australia now exports to the world. Introductory Note What are the origins and substance of this “realist tradition”? Perhaps the best summary of it is to be found in Anderson’s own The first comprehensive Anderson bibliography was the one reading, currently represented in the books in Anderson’s library constructed for Studies in Empirical Philosophy (1962). It listed as bequeathed to the University of Sydney. I supply an edited but Anderson’s published philsophical work and a fair representation unabridged version of the list of these books that appears on the of his published social criticism. In 1984 Geraldine Suter published John Anderson SETIS website, to follow the bibliography proper.
  • Theoretical Analysis of Depreciation in Municipalities (Gnosiology, Ontology and Epistemology)

    Theoretical Analysis of Depreciation in Municipalities (Gnosiology, Ontology and Epistemology)

    Trakia Journal of Sciences, Vol. 17, Suppl. 1, pp 524-529, 2019 Copyright © 2019 Trakia University Available online at: http://www.uni-sz.bg ISSN 1313-7069 (print) ISSN 1313-3551 (online) doi:10.15547/tjs.2019.s.01.083 THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF DEPRECIATION IN MUNICIPALITIES (GNOSIOLOGY, ONTOLOGY AND EPISTEMOLOGY) D. Velikov* Department of Finance and Management, Plovdiv University "Paisii Hilendarski", Plovdiv, Bulgaria ABSTRACT The amortization charge leads to an improvement in the quality of accountability and public finance statistics. Accounting analysis is part of the information function of accounting. The aim of the publication is to analyze depreciation in municipalities and to propose a synthesis of properties and a summary of common features, trends and laws. The ontological nature of depreciation in accounting science presents the main problems solved by accounting for depreciation. Epistemological coverage of depreciation covers its origin, scope and peculiarities. The research methods are analysis and synthesis, comparison, analogy, modeling, systematization and summary, comparative and group accounting analysis. The results obtained are presented in tabular form. The conclusion is that by switching from a smaller range of the signage coverage of the unit to the depreciation in municipalities, we are targeting a wider range of sign coverage, pointing out the qualities of the different categories of depreciation in the municipalities as an internal definition and an external manifestation. Key words: depreciation, theoretical analysis, accounting, public sector, category, quality. INTRODUCTION expression of the systematic distribution of the The accrual of depreciation in the public sector depreciable value of the asset over its last life. leads to an improvement in the quality of The subject of the survey is the normative accountability and public finance statistics.
  • Writings of Charles De Koninck, Volume

    Writings of Charles De Koninck, Volume

    D E K O N I N The Writings C K of ልሎ CHARLES C H DE KONINCK A R T L h E e S W D r i E t i n K g O s o N f I N C K ልሎ Edited and Translated by Ralph McInerny The Writings of CHARLES DE KONINCK Charles De Koninck, University of Laval, Quebec. The Writings of CHARLES DE KONINCK volume one Edited and Translated by Ralph McInerny with a biography by Thomas De Koninck andልሎ an introduction by Leslie Armour University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana DeKoninck-000.FM 4/15/08 1:17 PM Page iv Copyright © by University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana www.undpress.nd.edu All Rights Reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Designed by Wendy McMillen Set in ./. Minion by Four Star Books Printed on # Nature’s Recycle paper by Sheridan Books, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Koninck, Charles de, d. [Works. English. ] The writings of Charles De Koninck / edited and translated by Ralph McInerny ; with a biography by Thomas De Koninck ; and an introduction by Leslie Armour. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. -: ---- (cloth : alk. paper) -: --- (cloth : alk. paper) . Koninck, Charles de, d. Science—Philosophy. I. McInerny, Ralph M. II. Title. '.—dc This book is printed on recycled paper. Contents Preface vii The Philosophy of Charles De Koninck 1 Leslie Armour Charles De Koninck: A Biographical Sketch 69 Thomas De Koninck ልሎ Works by Charles De Koninck The Philosophy of Sir Arthur Eddington (1934) 99 The Cosmos (1936) 235 The Problem of Indeterminism (1935) 355 Reflections on the Problem of Indeterminism (1937) 401 Are the Experimental Sciences Distinct from the Philosophy of Nature? (1941) 443 Index 457 Preface A few years ago, David Quackenbush, a tutor at Thomas Aquinas College in California, conceived the idea of photocopying the Charles De Koninck ar- chives at the University of Laval.
  • JAMES TARTAGLIA CV, COMPLETE Revap

    JAMES TARTAGLIA CV, COMPLETE Revap

    JAMES TARTAGLIA Areas of Specialisation PHILOSOPHY: Philosophy of Mind, Rorty, Metaphysics, Metaphilosophy, Meaning of Life JAZZ: Tenor Saxophone, Composition Areas of Competence PHILOSOPHY: History of Philosophy, Continental and Chinese Philosophy JAZZ: Alto Saxophone, Piano / Keyboards / Organ 1. PERSONAL DETAILS Born: 1973 Nationality: British Business Address: School of Politics, International Relations and Philosophy, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom Email: [email protected] Staff Webpage: http://www.keele.ac.uk/spire/staff/tartaglia/ Personal Website: http://www.jamestartaglia.com/ Tel: +44 (0) 1782-734-315 Fax: +44 (0) 1782-733-592 2. QUALIFICATIONS AND AWARDS 1989 Second place in Daily Telegraph Young Jazz Musician of the Year (GCSE category) 1991 Winner of Daily Telegraph Young Jazz Musician of the Year (Soloist category) 1992 Awarded major scholarship to study at Berklee College of Music, USA (from competitive auditions in Frankfurt, which I was invited to after sending a demo tape) 1992-3 Diploma in Performance Studies, Berklee College of Music, USA (saxophone teacher: George Garzone) 1993-6 BA (Hons) in Philosophy - First Class University College London 1996-8 M.Phil. in Philosophy – Passed, no amendments University College London Thesis Title: ‘Understanding intentionality in terms of natural selection’ 1998-2002 Ph.D. in Philosophy – Passed, no amendments (viva in 2001) 1 University College London Thesis Title: ‘The Obstinacy of Appearance: An analysis and attempted resolution of the explanatory gap debate about consciousness’. (Examiners: Galen Strawson and Scott Sturgeon) 2009 Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Postgraduate Certificate, Keele University 2011 Keele Award for Excellence in Teaching and Learning 3. RESEARCH FUNDING 1996-1998 British Academy Studentship, competition A 1998-2000 British Academy Studentship, competition B 2000-1 A.J.
  • Prof. G. Dawes Hicks, F.B.A

    Prof. G. Dawes Hicks, F.B.A

    No 3726, MARCH 29, 1941 NATURE 381 adequate explanation has so far been forthcoming. sections, each to be kept submerged for a different Other areas are also known which, after many period of time. The maximum period of inundation years in an almost disease-free state, are now will be eighteen months. This experiment is based becoming rapidly affected. The collective ex­ on the facts that soil fungi such as Fusarium perience, practical and scientific, in Central cubense require oxygen to live, and that, when America is that hydrogen ion concentration is the highly infected soil was submerged for one month master factor determining the severity of Panama under two feet of water, no F. cubense could be disease, followed by texture ; but, as Reinking'!! found in it. The outcome of this experiment will work shows, distribution of the pathogen and be awaited with the greatest interest by all assoc­ density of its population in the soil obviously iated with the extensive alluvial banana lands of require careful consideration •. Central America. Already it has been found that The Panama disease situation in Central in new land, built up by the sedimentation of America is being closely watched, and on the controlled flood water, and therefore subjected to properties of the larger companies every effort is several inundations, the incidence of Panama being made to check its spread and to test out disease has been negligible. This may be con­ any new idea which might eventually have some sidered as an indication of the probable success of economic value. An unusually interesting and flood-fallowing, but time alone will tell.
  • INTENTIONALITY Past and Future VIBS

    INTENTIONALITY Past and Future VIBS

    INTENTIONALITY Past and Future VIBS Volume 173 Robert Ginsberg Founding Editor Peter A. Redpath Executive Editor Associate Editors G. John M. Abbarno Matti Häyry Mary-Rose Barral Steven V. Hicks Gerhold K. Becker Richard T. Hull Raymond Angelo Belliotti Mark Letteri Kenneth A. Bryson Vincent L. Luizzi C. Stephen Byrum Alan Milchman H. G. Callaway George David Miller Robert A. Delfino Alan Rosenberg Rem B. Edwards Arleen L. F. Salles Andrew Fitz-Gibbon John R. Shook Francesc Forn i Argimon Eddy Souffrant William Gay Tuija Takala Dane R. Gordon Anne Waters J. Everet Green John R. Welch Heta Aleksandra Gylling Thomas F. Woods a volume in Cognitive Science CS Francesc Forn i Argimon, Editor INTENTIONALITY Past and Future Edited by Gábor Forrai and George Kampis Amsterdam - New York, NY 2005 Cover Design: Studio Pollmann The paper on which this book is printed meets the requirements of “ISO 9706:1994, Information and documentation - Paper for documents - Requirements for permanence”. ISBN: 90-420-1817-8 ©Editions Rodopi B.V., Amsterdam - New York, NY 2005 Printed in the Netherlands CONTENTS Preface vii List of Abbreviations ix ONE The Necessity and Nature of Mental Content 1 LAIRD ADDIS TWO Reading Brentano on the Intentionality of the Mental 15 PHILIP J. BARTOK THREE Emotions, Moods, and Intentionality 25 WILLIAM FISH FOUR Lockean Ideas as Intentional Contents 37 GÁBOR FORRAI FIVE Normativity and Mental Content 51 JUSSI HAUKIOJA SIX The Ontological and Intentional Status of Fregean Senses: An Early Account of External Content 63 GREG JESSON