Issue 43 Newsletter 2010 2010
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Beaufort Family
FRIENDS OF WOKING PALACE The Beaufort Family The Beauforts were the children of John of Gaunt and his mistress, Katherine Swynford. Although the children were born whilst John was married to Constance, Queen of Castile, the line was legitimised by Papal Bull and Act of Parliament and became the House of Tudor in 1485 when Henry VII defeated Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth Field. The connection of the Beauforts with Woking house began when John Beaufort married Margaret Holland the sister and coheir of the childless Edmund Holland, Earl of Kent. John Beaufort, (c1371-16 March 1409/10) illegitimate son of John of Gaunt and Katherine Swynford created Earl of Somerset 9 February 1396/7 and Marquess of Dorset and Marquess of Somerset 29 September 1397, married before 28 September 1397, Margaret Holland, daughter, Thomas, Earl of Kent John died 16 March 1409/10 in the hospital of St Catherine by the Tower of London and was buried in St Michael's chapel in Canterbury Cathedral. His widow married secondly Thomas, Duke of Clarence (1387-1421) see later. TCP John, Duke of Somerset son of above died 27 May 1444 married Margaret Beauchamp of Bletso in or about 1442, widow of Sir Oliver St John, sister and heir of John, Lord Beauchamp, created Earl of Kendal and Duke of Somerset 28 August 1443. After the death of John, Duke of Somerset, his wife married Leo Welles who was slain at Towton 29 March 1461. She died at a great age shortly before 3 June 1482. The only child and heir of this marriage was Lady Margaret Beaufort born 31 May 1443. -
Fishers Farm
1 Fishers Farm Listing The house is Grade II * listed, the description being as follows: House. C15 with C17 extensions to the rear, late C18 front. Timber framed core, brick cladding, red brick to the rear, yellow to front; plain tiled hipped roofs with centre ridge stack to front and large diagonal stacks with moulded tops to the rear. Main front with 2 rear wings at right angles with lobby entrance. 2 storeys, brick hand over ground floor and to base of parapet, quoined angles. 5 bays to front, glazing bar sash windows under gauged camber heads; blocked window on red brick surround with cill brackets to first floor centre. Central six panelled door, with traceried fanlight in a surround of Doric half columns supporting an open pediment. C19 single storey weatherboard addition to the right. Rear: two wings connected by arched entrance screen wall, brick bands over the ground floor. Interior: Extensive framing of substantial scantling exposed in left wing, deep brick fireplaces with wooden lintels. Fine Jacobean style staircase with turned balusters, scroll spiked newel posts and SS carving to underside of staircase arch 2 Period The listing suggests the date of the first build as being in the 15th century which would place the original house in the Medieval period. The front certainly looks to be an added 18th century one. Assuming the 15th century date to be correct, one would expect to find a hipped roof see photograph above with flatways rafters and/or flat joists plus jowled posts. Although the reported earliest known date of 1527 is in the Tudor period, there is no reason why the house should not be earlier. -
Bulletin 425 February 2011
Registered Charity No: 272098 ISSN 0585-9980 SURREY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CASTLE ARCH, GUILDFORD GU1 3SX Tel/ Fax: 01483 532454 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.surreyarchaeology.org.uk Bulletin 425 February 2011 GERTRUDE JEKYLL’S BOOTS (see p. 21) ASHTEAD ROMAN VILLA AND TILEWORKS David Bird The fifth main season of excavation on Ashtead Common was undertaken by the Society’s Roman Studies Group between 25th August and 13th September last year. There were four new trenches and extensions to two from previous years, together with the re-opening of Trench 9. The main results were a new and somewhat enigmatic building west of the villa; the enclosure wall confirmed even further west than this; increased support for the theory that there were at least three main periods of building on the villa site; further knowledge of the tiled base area found in 2009; and full understanding of the tile kiln (now sampled for archaeomagnetic dating) – with the discovery, very late in the dig, of evidence suggesting that it was standing on top of an earlier one. All objectives for the season were thus achieved, but with a considerable sting in the tail. A new trench (16) was placed to the west of the villa to explore the results of fieldwork by John Hampton in the 1960s, magnetometry previously carried out by Archaeology South East and test pitting in the spring. The line of a well-built flint wall foundation was found but with an odd configuration: there were two well-finished gaps either side of a 1.72m stretch of wall which had a covering tile course. -
Microfilms Internationa! 300 N
INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy. -
Public Spirit and Public Order. Edmund Burke and the Role of the Critic in Mid- Eighteenth-Century Britain
Public Spirit and Public Order. Edmund Burke and the Role of the Critic in Mid- Eighteenth-Century Britain Ian Crowe A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Advisor: Professor Jay M. Smith Reader: Professor Christopher Browning Reader: Professor Lloyd Kramer Reader: Professor Donald Reid Reader: Professor Thomas Reinert © 2008 Ian Crowe ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Ian Crowe: Public Spirit and Public Order. Edmund Burke and the Role of the Critic in Mid- Eighteenth-Century Britain (Under the direction of Dr. Jay M. Smith) This study centers upon Edmund Burke’s early literary career, and his move from Dublin to London in 1750, to explore the interplay of academic, professional, and commercial networks that comprised the mid-eighteenth-century Republic of Letters in Britain and Ireland. Burke’s experiences before his entry into politics, particularly his relationship with the bookseller Robert Dodsley, may be used both to illustrate the political and intellectual debates that infused those networks, and to deepen our understanding of the publisher-author relationship at that time. It is argued here that it was Burke’s involvement with Irish Patriot debates in his Dublin days, rather than any assumed Catholic or colonial resentment, that shaped his early publications, not least since Dodsley himself was engaged in a revision of Patriot literary discourse at his “Tully’s Head” business in the light of the legacy of his own patron Alexander Pope. -
Bulletin 439 June 2013
Registered Charity No: 272098 ISSN 0585-9980 SURREY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CASTLE ARCH, GUILDFORD GU1 3SX Tel/ Fax: 01483 532454 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.surreyarchaeology.org.uk Bulletin 439 June 2013 WOKING PALACE 2012 Fig 1. Trench 16: Medieval and Tudor wall foundations and hearth. WOKING PALACE – The 2012 excavations Rob Poulton A fourth season of community archaeological excavation work at Woking Palace was organised by the Surrey County Archaeological Unit and Surrey Archaeological Society, with the support, especially financial, of Woking Borough Council, and took place between 12th September and 30th September 2012. The exceptionally large (over three hectares) moated site was the manor house of Woking from soon after it was granted to Alan Basset in 1189. During the next three hundred years it was sometimes in royal hands, and otherwise often occupied by those close to the throne, most notably Lady Margaret Beaufort, the mother of Henry VII, who lived there with her third husband. In 1503 Henry VII decided to make it a palace, and it remained a royal house until 1620 when it was granted to Sir Edward Zouch, and soon after mostly demolished. Nevertheless its remains are exceptionally interesting and include well-preserved moats (fig 1), ruined and standing structures and fishponds. The 2009 (trenches 1-3), 2010 (trenches 6, 9, 10, and 11), and 2011 (trenches 12- 14) excavations (fig 2) confirmed that the site was newly occupied around 1200, and revealed that ashlar buildings had been constructed in the earliest phases. Around 1300 these were demolished and replaced by a much larger range of stone buildings that formed part of the privy lodgings, and were built on a sufficient scale to continue in this role until the palace was demolished. -
Issue 55 Newsletter July 2013
Issue 55 Newsletter July 2013 The year is swiftly passing, and it’s time for another newsletter already. We would also like to remind members that subscriptions for 2013/14 became due at the AGM in May. Many thanks to those of you who have already renewed. If you were unable to get to the AGM, and your subs are due, you should find a reminder attached to this newsletter. Subs can either be dropped in at Byfleet library, or sent direct to our treasurer (details on the form) — whichever is easier for you. Thanks very much for your support. We hope you enjoy this issue (with any luck while sitting in the sun!) and we hope to see some of you at Parish Day, which this year will be on July 20th. See you there! FORTHCOMING EVENTS 2013 2013 WHAT DO YOU THINK? Thursday 18th July: Chris Glasow - City Jeff is starting to fix up next year's meetings and this has led to some thought about when to set our meeting Livery Companies. St Mary’s Day Centre, dates. Stream Close, 8.15pm. We have always had our meetings on a Thursday, and Thursday 12th September: Cobham's we have been able to have this slot at the Day Centre. historian, Dr David Taylor, tells us all about However, we have tended to vary the week of the "Gerrard Winstanley and the Diggers". St month (i.e. our meetings are not always on the second Mary’s Day Centre, Stream Close, 8.15pm. Thursday in the month, for example). -
Te Sequor: a Study of Pope's Observations on the Iliad of Homer
Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Fall 2011 Te Sequor: A Study of Pope's Observations on The Iliad of Homer Drew Nathaniel Keane Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Recommended Citation Keane, Drew Nathaniel, "Te Sequor: A Study of Pope's Observations on The Iliad of Homer" (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 185. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/185 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TE SEQUOR: A STUDY OF POPE’S OBSERVATIONS ON THE ILIAD OF HOMER by DREW NATHANIEL KEANE (Under the Direction of J. B. Griffin) ABSTRACT Although has been written on Pope’s translation of the Iliad, little has been written directly on his commentary, which comprise more than half of Pope’s work. This study seeks to correct this neglect and argues that Pope’s commentary is a vital part of his Iliad. I examine Pope’s place among English and French poets and commentators, the epic tradition, and Pope’s understanding of the commentator’s role. INDEX WORDS: Pope, Alexander, Iliad, Homer, Epic, Eighteenth century, Translation, Commentary 1 TE SEQUOR: A STUDY OF POPE’S OBSERVATIONS ON THE ILIAD OF HOMER by DREW NATHANIEL KEANE B.A., Johnson University, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Georgia Southern University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS STATESBORO, GEORGIA 2011 2 © 2011 DREW NATHANIEL KEANE All Rights Reserved 3 TE SEQUOR: A STUDY OF POPE’S OBSERVATIONS ON THE ILIAD OF HOMER by DREW NATHANIEL KEANE Major Professor: J. -
Introduction: Pope and Berkeley
Notes Introduction: Pope and Berkeley 1. The study of iconic relations in language and literature is ongoing in, for example, The Motivated Sign: Iconicity in Language and Literature 2, ed. Olga Fischer and Max Nänny (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2001). 2. ‘An Essay on Translated Verse’, l. 345, in Augustan Critical Writing, ed. David Womersley (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1997), p. 118. 3. Ovid’s Metamorphosis Englished, trans. George Sandys (London: W. Stansby, 1626), pp. 54–5. This is one of the first books Pope read, and one that he ‘liked extremely’. See Joseph Spence, Observations, Anecdotes, and Characters of Books and Men, ed. James M. Osborn, 2 vols (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966), I, 14, No. 30. 4. Rousseau’s emphasis on the difficulty of ‘inventing’ language serves the important rhetorical purpose of forcing his readers to consider just how long and complex a process human evolution is. See A Discourse on Inequality, trans. Maurice Cranston (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984), pp. 92–7, p. 93. 5. Gregory A.F. Hollingshead, George Berkeley and English Literature of the Eight- eenth Century 1710–1770 With Special Reference to Swift, Pope, Blackwell, and Smart, PhD, University of London, 1974, p. 39. Hollingshead offers an overview of the friendship, pp. 35–45. 6. For attributions of Guardian papers to Pope and Berkeley, see The Guardian, ed. John Calhoun Stephens (Lexington, Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky, 1982), pp. 26–8, and David Berman, George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), p. 77. 7. Benjamin Rand, ed., Berkeley and Percival: The Correspondence of George Berkeley afterwards Bishop of Cloyne and Sir John Percival afterwards Earl of Egmont (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1914), p. -
Bulletin 385 July 2005
R e g i s t e r e d C h a r i t y N o : 2 7 2 0 9 8 I S S N 0 5 8 5 - 9 9 8 0 SURREY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CASTLE ARCH, GUILDFORD GU1 3SX Tel/ Fax: 01483 532454 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.surreyarchaeoiogy.org.uk Bulletin 385 July 2005 P E N N T I L E F R O M W O K I N G C H U R C H M E D I E VA L T I L E S I N O L D W O K I N G C H U R C H P h i l i p A r n o l d St Peter's, Old Woking is fortunate in having two tiles and some fragments that probably formed part of the floor that existed before the church was visited by its Victorian restorers. Although the tiles could have been removed before the 19th century, Edward Hasseli's water colours of the interior of the church (nos 1128, 1133 and 1144 dated 1829/30) show the floor at that time made of flagstones as well as, what appear to be, square tiles, although no detail is shown. The tiles and fragments were discovered under the floor in the nave and it is fortunate that they were retained rather than thrown into a skip. Most of the tiles and fragments are Penn tiles which, as the name implies, were made at Penn in Buckinghamshire. -
Newark, Pyrford, Old Woking, Broad Mead & Papercourt Meadows
Byfleet, West Byfleet & Pyrford Residents Association – Footpath Group 6 - Newark, Pyrford, Old Woking, Broad Mead & Papercourt Meadows This is an 8 kilometre local walk that starts and finishes at the Newark Lane car park next to the Wey Navigation. You will pass historic landmarks, including two of our local churches, take in fine views, maybe see some wildlife and perhaps try out a nearby pub! It’s advisable to wear sturdy footwear and carry a pair of binoculars. Take care when crossing roads. Start: OS Explorer Map 145 grid ref: 039574. We begin by turning left out of the car park onto Newark Lane, crossing three bridges in quick succession including the old Newark mill race. To your right, are the ruins of Newark Priory, a 12th century Augustinian priory founded during the reign of Richard I. Walk along Newark Lane, crossing to the left hand side of the road before the Bourne Stream Bridge. Continue until the road bends sharply to the right. Take the footpath directly ahead and climb the steep path to emerge next to St Nicholas’s Church, Pyrford, built around 1140 AD. On leaving the church, cross the road carefully and enter the churchyard extension following the pathway to the double stile. You will pass Lady Place Farm on the left and then through a kissing gate. Continue for 150 m and at the field boundary (powerlines overhead) turn sharp left taking the footpath up the slope to join Church Hill at the junction with Sandy Lane bridleway. Just before you reach this point take a moment to enjoy the fine panoramic views to the south and east. -
WOKING DE LA ZOUCH Iain Wakeford 2014
WOKING DE LA ZOUCH Iain Wakeford 2014 few months ago, whilst looking at the early manorial history of Woking, it was A suggested that Woking could legitimately claim the suffix of ‘Bassett’ (as in Royal Wootton Bassett), following the successive ownership of Alan, Gilbert, Fulk, Philip and finally Aliva Bassett in the late 12th and early 13th centuries. Whilst we are at it, we could possibly make a claim for the ‘Royal’ preface with all the Tudor Kings & Queens taking ownership of what became Woking Palace following the accession of Lady Margaret Beaufort’s son, Henry VII in 1485. Indeed Woking appears to have been one of Henry VIII’s favourite residences, with him visiting the palace almost every year of his reign. This early 18th century map shows Zouch’s Monument on the hill overlooking Hoe Place on what is now the Hoe Bridge Golf Course. building a new bridge over the river at Woking Muslim Burial Ground in the trees beside the ‘deemed necessary by Sir Edward Zouch, the road, but the name pre-dates that building and keeper’. instead refers to the fact that the road heads straight towards where Zouch’s Monument The term ‘keeper’ shows that Sir Edward didn’t used to be. own the Manor of Woking at that stage – he The Monument before it was destroyed in the late was just the keeper of the king’s deer park here Place names can be very confusing – perhaps 19th century – but he was working on it, and already he had we had better stick to plain old ‘Woking’ and built himself a new residence for himself beside forget adding anything to the beginning or the the Hoe Stream at what became known as ‘Hoe end! But with James VI of Scotland coming to the Place’.