DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 1: Choosing the Form of Business

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 1: Choosing the Form of Business Law 451 Corporations (O’Byrne) Chapter 1: Choosing the Form of Business Vehicle _______________________________________________ 7 Types of Business Vehicles ________________________________________________________________________ 7 Sole Proprietorship _______________________________________________________________________________________ 8 Corporation _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 9 Unlimited Liability Corporation (ULC) _____________________________________________________________________ 10 Partnership ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 10 General _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 10 Ordinary Partnership __________________________________________________________________________________ 10 Limited Partnership (“LP”) ______________________________________________________________________________ 11 Limited Liability Partnership (“LLP”) ______________________________________________________________________ 11 Joint Ventures __________________________________________________________________________________________ 12 Agency _______________________________________________________________________________________ 12 Agency and Business Law _________________________________________________________________________________ 12 Types of Authority ____________________________________________________________________________________ 12 Liability _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 13 Duties ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 13 Partnership ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 13 Volzke Construction v Westlock Foods (ABCA 1986) – functional test for determining partnership existence ______________ 13 McDonic Estate v Hetherington (ONCA 1997) – liability of partners in an ordinary partnership (not LLP) law firm for misconduct of one partner – Tests for Authority ________________________________________________________________________ 14 Chapter 2: A Background to Corporation _____________________________________________________ 15 Salomon v Salomon (1897 ENG HL) - liability of directors is protected under a corporation – individuals can incorporate ____ 16 History of Corporations __________________________________________________________________________________ 17 Corporate Constitution ____________________________________________________________________________ 18 Purpose _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 19 Corporate Structure _____________________________________________________________________________________ 19 Methods of Creating Corporate Constitutions _______________________________________________________________ 19 Letters Patent (only applies in PEI & Quebec) _____________________________________________________________ 20 Memorandum of Association (MoA) ____________________________________________________________________ 20 Articles of Incorporation ______________________________________________________________________________ 20 Canadian Jorex Ltd v 477749 Alberta Ltd (ABCA 1991) – residuary power held by corporate directors - power to cancel special meetings - shareholder remedies __________________________________________________________________ 20 Chapter 3: The Process of Incorporation ______________________________________________________ 22 Procedures ___________________________________________________________________________________ 22 Choosing Where to Incorporate __________________________________________________________________________ 22 How does one incorporate under the ABCA? ________________________________________________________________ 22 Who can incorporate?: ________________________________________________________________________________ 22 Required Incorporation Documents _______________________________________________________________________ 23 Restricting the transfer of shares upon incorporation: (why do it?) ___________________________________________ 23 Consequences of Incorporation ___________________________________________________________________________ 23 Corporate Records and other matters _____________________________________________________________________ 23 1 Unanimous Shareholder Agreements (USAs) ________________________________________________________________ 24 Cicco v 609940 Ontario Inc (Trustee of) – U.S.A not binding on 3rd party with no notice of restrictive authority of directors – Bankpructy assignment not annulled by USA _______________________________________________________________ 24 Corporate By-Laws ______________________________________________________________________________________ 25 Directors’ Organizational Meeting __________________________________________________________________________ 25 Kinds of Corporations ___________________________________________________________________________________ 26 Loss Prevention – Code of Professional Conduct_____________________________________________________________ 26 Corporate Names ______________________________________________________________________________________ 27 Common Law and Statutory Requirements _______________________________________________________________ 27 Paws Pet Food and Accessories Ltd v Paws and Shop Inc (1992 ABQB) - Misleading corporate name – Court order to change ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ 28 Stenner v Scotia Capital Inc (2007 BCSC) – elements of a Passing Off Action – Subsequent use of family name with goodwill attached not permitted ________________________________________________________________________________ 28 Share Capital ___________________________________________________________________________________________ 30 Equity Financing _____________________________________________________________________________________ 30 Classification of Shares ________________________________________________________________________________ 30 Pre-Incorporation Contracts ______________________________________________________________________ 31 Conflicting Common Law ________________________________________________________________________________ 32 Kelner v Baxter (1866 UK) – promoter liable when entering into Pre-Incorp. Contract ______________________________ 32 Black v Smallwood (1966 Australia HC) – Promoter not necessarily liable in pre-incorp. contract – look to intentions _____ 32 Statutory Reform: e.g. CBCA s. 14 __________________________________________________________________________ 32 Judicial Treatment of Statutory Rules ______________________________________________________________________ 32 Westcom Radio Group Ltd v MacIsaac (1989 ONCA) – Poor Decision – promoter not held liable ______________________ 32 Sherwood Design Services Inc v 872935 Ontario Ltd (1998 ONCA) – conduct required for corporation to adopt contract (dissent in obiter) _____________________________________________________________________________________ 33 Practice Considerations: ____________________________________________________________________________ 34 Szecket v Huang (ONCA 1998) – liability of promoter/agent to be determined by statutory rules, not old CL ____________ 34 Measure of Damages ___________________________________________________________________________________ 34 Wickberg v Shatsky et al (1969 BCSC) – breach of warranty of authority – must be cause of loss to third party - damage measurement ________________________________________________________________________________________ 34 Pre-Incorporation Contracts in Alberta – ABCA s. 15 __________________________________________________________ 35 Chapter 4: The Corporation as a Legal Person _________________________________________________ 36 Summary _____________________________________________________________________________________ 36 One-Person Corporation _________________________________________________________________________ 37 Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd (1961 Privy Council) – director and shareholder of corporation can employ themselves – WCB claim by wife after husband’s death 37 Grounds for Liability of those Behind the Corporation _______________________________________________ 37 Liability based on lifting the corporate veil _________________________________________________________________ 37 Kosmopoulos v Constitution Insurance Co of Canada (1987 SCC) - Salomon principle is not enforced when it yields result too flagrantly opposed to justice ____________________________________________________________________________ 38 Big Bend Hotel Ltd v Security Mutual Casualty Co (1980 BCSC) – corporate veil lifted for corporation being used as a “sham and a cloak” _________________________________________________________________________________________ 38 Performance Industries Ltd v Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd (2000 ABCA; aff’d by SCC) – lifting the corporate veil for “fraudulent, dishonest, and deceitful” action _______________________________________________________________ 38 2 Jin v Ren (2015 ABQB, aff’d by the ABCA) – unjust enrichment claim – investments retained for improper purpose by director – corporate veil lifted __________________________________________________________________________________ 39 Wildman v Wildman (2006 ONCA) – corporate veil lifted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Legal Innovation and State Competition for Corporate Charters
    The States as a Laboratory: Legal Innovation and State Competition for Corporate Charters Roberta Romanot Corporate law is an arena in which the metaphor of the "states as a laboratory" describes actual practice, and, for the most part, this is a laboratory that has worked reasonably well. The goal of this Article is to map out over time the diffusion of corporate law reforms across the states. The law- making pattern we observe indicates a dynamic process in which legal innovations originate from several sources, creating a period of legal experimentation that tends to identify a statutoryformulation that is thereafter adopted by the vast majority of states. Delaware and the Model Act quite often work in tandem. But there are occasions when they advance differing legal rules, accounting for some of the diversity in corporation codes that we observe. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 2 10 I. Key Features of U.S. Corporate Law ........................................................ 212 II. The Laboratory of State Competition for Charters ................................... 214 A. The Diffusion of CorporateLaw Reforms .......................................... 216 1. The Drive for Greater Organizational Flexibility and Delaware's 1967 Code Revision ................................................. 216 2. The D & 0 Insurance Crisis and Limitations on Directors' L iab ility ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Profile Oneibc Final
    UV định hình UV định hình UV định hình UV định hình In today’s global marketplace, globalization, technological advances, and demographic shifts have brought opportunities to many - empowering and connecting people then creating a vibrant and diverse world. The business success increasingly requires active trading participation in foreign markets. Emerging companies typically operate in rapidly evolving industries where expertise, speed and efficiency are rewarded. Clients look to One IBC to consult clients through the complexities, we are The Trust and Company Service Provider in safeguarding the clients from the risks so that there are no limitation for their success. Together with an in-depth knowledge of international jurisdiction, One IBC provides expertise and support our clients as they conduct their business in global smoothly. Whether you are doing business in Europe, Asia, Africa, the Middle East, the Americas or elsewhere, One IBC will set up the best trading or holding structure for your business in line with local laws and regulations. We also have the necessary expertise in the administrative support and managing companies to maximize opportunities and achieve long - term sustainability, from fullback office solutions to assist with tax and regulatory compliance. To reach our ambition, we are making significant changes to how we operate our business so that we have the highest-performing teams, delivering professional client services worldwide. I would like to thank our clients and partners for their continued support, trust “Closely monitoring changes global environment and understanding in the future. and the need of the clients, One IBC Group in creating new business opportunities and pursue growth strategies.” One IBC Limited stands for One International Business Consultancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 3. Where Does the Beneficial Owner Hide?
    Part 3. Where Does the Benefi cial Owner Hide? “Vice knows she’s ugly, so puts on her mask.” — Benjamin Franklin 3.1 Introduction Th is study revealed that, in the vast majority of grand corruption cases we analyzed, corporate vehicles—including companies, trusts, foundations, and fi ctitious entities— are misused to conceal the identities of the people involved in the corruption. Of these corporate vehicles, the company was the most frequently used. Investigators confi rmed this misuse, noting that locating information about the person who is in control of a corporate vehicle was essential to any large-scale corruption investigation, and indeed, to almost any large-scale organized-crime investigation. Despite the widespread misuse of corporate vehicles for criminal purposes (including corruption, fi nancing terrorism, money laundering, and fraud), most countries have no coherent strategy to tackle this problem. Th is chapter identifi es the types of corporate vehicles used to conceal the identity of the person involved in the corruption and other obstacles that investigators may face. An overview of each of these corporate vehicles is given in appendix C. 3.2 Corporate Vehicles: Types and Features Th is section describes the various types of corporate vehicles that have been used in grand corruption schemes. We distinguish four distinct categories: • Companies • Trusts • Foundations • Fictitious entities and unincorporated economic organizations. (Fictitious entities is an outlier category, encompassing sole proprietorships, the vari- ous forms of partnerships, and other functionally eff ective equivalents.) We provide an overview of the main characteristics of these corporate vehicles. Th eir precise nature, the ways in which they are misused for criminal ends, and the extent to which they are misused vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction; nonetheless, our study revealed a num- ber of global similarities.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Get Unlimited Business Financing Without a Personal Guarantee
    BUSINESS FINANCING SECRETS How To Get Unlimited Business Financing Without A Personal Guarantee Michael Senoff Interviews Foremost Business Financing Expert Dear Student, I’m Michael Senoff, founder and CEO of HardToFindSeminars.com. For the last five years, I’ve interviewed the world’s best business and marketing minds. And along the way, I’ve created a successful home-based publishing business all from my two-car garage. When my first child was born, he was very sick, and it was then that I knew I had to have a business that I could operate from home. Now, my challenge is to build the world’s largest free resource for online, downloadable audio business interviews. I knew that I needed a site that contained strategies, solutions, and inside information to help you operate more efficiently I’ve learned a lot in the last five years, and today I’m going to show you the skills that you need to survive. It is my mission, to assist those that are very busy with their careers And to really make my site different from every other audio content site on the web, I have decided to give you access to this information in a downloadable format. Now, let’s get going. Michael Senoff Founder & CEO: www.hardtofindseminars.com Copyright Notices Copyright © MMVII - © MMVIII by JS&M Sales & Marketing Inc No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical or electronic, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Statementoffice of the Deputy Attorney
    STATEMENT OF JENNIFER SHASKY CALVERY SENIOR COUNSEL TO THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS HEARING ENTITLED “EXAMINING STATE BUSINESS INCORPORATION PRACTICES: A DISCUSSION OF THE INCORPORATION TRANSPARENCY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ACT” PRESENTED JUNE 18, 2009 Good afternoon, Chairman Lieberman, Ranking Member Collins and distinguished Members of the Committee. I am honored to appear before the Homeland Security Committee to discuss the critical need for greater transparency in corporate formation in this country. Nearly three years ago the Department testified before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs about the difficulties that U.S. shell companies often pose to law enforcement efforts—and the need for improved access to beneficial ownership information of these companies. In this context, we use the term “shell company” to refer to a legal entity, established under the laws of a State, that has no independent operations or assets of its own. Unfortunately, since the Committee last examined this issue, the problem has not improved. So I am pleased that the Department has another opportunity to speak with you about this important issue and that the conversation has now moved from framing the problem to developing possible legislative solutions. The term shell company often evokes images of exotic offshore financial centers and money laundering havens. Unfortunately, some of the worst offenders are not “exotic” locales at all, but rather some of our own States. In 2006, we spoke of an unscientific internet search that we conducted using the words “shell corporation”.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Available Shelf Aged Companies
    London Offices, United Kingdom Wellington Offices, New Zealand SVS House, Oliver Grove 44 Mairangi Road, Wadestown SE25 6EJ London, UK Wellington 6012 Phone: + 44 200 222 7241 New Zealand Phone: + 64 4 909 7394 Website: www.tba-associates.com Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________________________________ LIST OF AVAILABLE SHELF AGED COMPANIES Shelf and aged Companies are previously formed companies also known by a number of terms, i.e. Shelf or shell (usually refers to publicly traded) or aged or seasoned companies, corporations, limited liability companies or partnerships or combinations of terms. Irrespective of the term, a shelf company offers unique opportunities. Perhaps the leading reason for acquiring an aged entity in general is credibility. An answer to the most common question, yes you may merge your history with an aged entity. Business relationships are frequently influenced by the length of time a company has been in existence. This is often true when establishing financial and client/vendor relationships. Aged Corporations are corporations that are formed, but have never been used. There are examples in business when being able to show that you've been incorporated for a period of time is essential; you may need an Aged Corporation if: · You are trying to establish a history for your business. · You wish to enhance your corporations’ image with age. · You want to build corporate credit. It may be easier with age. · You want to encourage companies to do business with you. Some companies are more willing to do business with an established company vs. a younger company. · If you wish to bid on a contract that requires your corporation be established for a certain period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Terror
    UNIVERSITY of PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW Founded 1852 Formerly AMERICAN LAW REGISTER © 2014 by the University of Pennsylvania Law Review VOL. 162 FEBRUARY 2014 NO. 3 ARTICLE FUNDING TERROR SHIMA BARADARAN,† MICHAEL FINDLEY,‡ DANIEL NIELSON†† & JASON SHARMAN‡‡ † Associate Professor of Law, University of Utah College of Law. We thank the Yale University Institution for Social and Policy Studies (ISPS) for their support of this project and the BYU Office of Research & Creative Activities for their award of a MEG Grant in support and furtherance of our work. We express gratitude to the Yale, Columbia, Cornell, Maryland, Northwestern, Vanderbilt, William & Mary, Utah, University of Miami, Wisconsin, USC, and BYU law and political science faculties for their feedback. We would also like to thank officials in the U.S. Department of Justice, Internal Revenue Service, Financial Action Task Force (FATF), World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investiga- tions, and United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime for their assistance in this project. Special thanks to Spencer Driscoll as a student contributor on this Article. We express gratitude to Professors Oona Hathaway, Jack Goldsmith, Eric Posner, Jide Nzelibe, Susan Hyde, Robert Keohane, Daniel Kono, Jim Kuklinski, Larry May, Robert Mikos, David Moore, David Gray, Dan Goldberg, Bill Reynolds, Max Sterns, Stephanie Rickard, Toby Rider, Michael A. Newton, Christopher Slobogin, Scott Wolford, Ingrid Wuerth, Yesha Yadav, Carissa Hessick, Scott Dodson, and Thomas Nance for their extremely useful comments. (477) 478 University of Pennsylvania Law Review [Vol. 162: 477 The events of September 11, 2001, forever changed the political and legal re- sponses to terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Edıtıon Premier Offshore International Tax & Business Guide
    ExPat Guide 2017 edıtıon Premier Offshore International Tax & Business Guide 2017 Edition The Complete Guide to U.S. Taxes for Americans Living, Working & Investing Abroad Author: Christian Reeves Published by Premier International Consultancy, LLC [email protected] www.premieroffshore.com © Copyright 2016, 2017 Premier International Consultancy, LLC, 1330 Market Street, Suite 513, San Diego, CA 92101. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without the express written consent of the publisher. The information contained herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 The Rules for Americans Overseas ................................................................................................................ 3 Foreign Income Must Be Reported ........................................................................................................... 3 Tax Advantages for Americans Overseas .................................................................................................. 4 Foreign Earned Income Exclusion ......................................................................................................... 5 Housing exclusion or deduction .......................................................................................................... 14 What exclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Corporations and Their Role in International Fraud
    ABSTRACT This paper investigates whether firms interacting with shell corporations face a higher likelihood of being engaged in fraudulent activities. As such, it can be theorized that three variables play an important role – Interaction, Attractiveness and Complexity. The first variable considers the relative amount of cash flows exchanged between the parties of interest and whether firms possess significant controllership interest in shell corporations. Attractiveness considers the location of the shell corporations interacting with the firm in interest. A location is deemed to be attractive if it provides high anonymity, financial secrecy and a stable environment for assets. The last variable quantifies the overall complexity of the financial scheme. Complexity is calculated using an SHELL CORPORATIONS AND algorithm which in essence estimates the level of interrelatedness between the parties involved in a shell THEIR ROLE IN scheme. Ram Bambani Prof. Dr. Bauke Visser INTERNATIONAL FRAUD Student number: 371650 Thesis Supervisor Bachelor Thesis Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.1. Structure of the research ...................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Economic and societal relevance ......................................................................................... 4 1.3. Academic relevance ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Llcl Overhaul Project
    LLCL OVERHAUL PROJECT REPORTS ON RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO PORTIONS OF THE NEW YORK LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LAW AD HOC GROUP OF BUSINESS LAW SECTION OF NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION JANUARY 2019 Opinions expressed are those of the Committee preparing this report and do not represent those of the New York State Bar Association unless and until they have been adopted by its House of Delegates or Executive Committee. Opinions expressed further do not represent those of the Business Law Section until approved by the Section's Executive Committee. 8258673.1 Introduction This booklet contains 16 short reports covering various sections of the New York Limited Liability Company Law [LLCL]. Each report identifies a statutory issue, describes the background and then suggests possible modification, amendment or enlargement of the particular LLCL section. The purpose of the reports is to initiate a wide dialogue by practitioners, business persons and academics about these areas and possibly other LLCL areas based upon their experiences with the LLCL and LLCs over the almost 25 since enactment of the LLCL. During this period, as word became known about the ease of formation, freedom of contract principles and flexibility of use, together with possible tax advantages and limited personal liability, LLCs have become the preferred form of business entity in New York and other jurisdictions. Our hope is that the dialogue will result in extensive recommendations to the State legislature for clarification and updating of the LLCL in order to enhance the use of LLCs in New York over the next decade. The booklet is a product of what we call the “LLCL Overhaul Project,” an ad hoc group within the Business Law Section of the NYS Bar Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of U.S. Correspondent Banking in International Money Laundering
    S. Hrg. 107–84 ROLE OF U.S. CORRESPONDENT BANKING IN INTERNATIONAL MONEY LAUNDERING HEARINGS BEFORE THE PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 1, 2, AND 6, 2001 VOLUME 1 OF 5 Printed for the use of the Committee on Governmental Affairs ( VerDate 11-MAY-2000 11:19 Aug 16, 2001 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 71166.TXT SAFFAIRS PsN: SAFFAIRS COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS FRED THOMPSON, Tennessee, Chairman JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut, Ranking Democrat TED STEVENS, Alaska CARL LEVIN, Michigan SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi MAX CLELAND, Georgia JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah JEAN CARNAHAN, Missouri HANNAH S. SISTARE, Staff Director and Counsel JOYCE A. RECHTSCHAFFEN, Democratic Staff Director and Counsel DARLA D. CASSELL, Chief Clerk PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine, Chairman CARL LEVIN, Michigan, Ranking Democrat TED STEVENS, Alaska DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi MAX CLELAND, Georgia JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah JEAN CARNAHAN, Missouri CHRISTOPHER A. FORD, Chief Counsel and Staff Director LINDA J. GUSTITUS, Democratic Chief Counsel and Staff Director ELISE J. BEAN, Democratic Deputy Chief Counsel ROBERT L. ROACH, Democratic Counsel and Chief Investigator MARY D.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Available Shelf Aged Companies
    London Offices, United Kingdom Wellington Offices, New Zealand SVS House, Oliver Grove Level 1, 4 Bond Street SE25 6EJ London, UK Wellington 6011 Phone: + 44 200 222 7241 New Zealand Phone: + 64 4 909 7394 Website: www.tba-associates.com Email: [email protected] __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ · You are trying to establish a history for your business. · You wish to enhance your corporations’ image with age. LIST OF AVAILABLE SHELF · You want to build corporate credit. It may be easier with age. AGED COMPANIES · You want to encourage companies to do business with you. Some companies are more willing to do business with an established company vs. a younger company. Shelf and aged Companies are previously formed companies also known · If you wish to bid on a contract that requires your corporation be by a number of terms, i.e. Shelf or shell (usually refers to publicly traded) established for a certain period of time. or aged or seasoned companies, corporations, limited liability companies · If you wish to obtain a bank loan. It may be easier if you can show you or partnerships or combinations of terms. have history of being incorporated. · If you wish to obtain corporate credit cards and leases. (For example, Irrespective of the term, a shelf company offers unique opportunities. Gateway computers lease only to corporations 6 months old or more, Perhaps the leading reason for acquiring an aged entity in general is etc.) credibility. An answer to the most common question, yes you may merge your history with an aged entity. Each shelf corporation was filed by our Firm for the specific purpose of being an aged corporation.
    [Show full text]