Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(B)(3) Registration # 333-140579
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Runway Excursion During Landing, Delta Air Lines Flight 1086, Boeing MD-88, N909DL, New York, New York, March 5, 2015
Runway Excursion During Landing Delta Air Lines Flight 1086 Boeing MD-88, N909DL New York, New York March 5, 2015 Accident Report NTSB/AAR-16/02 National PB2016-104166 Transportation Safety Board NTSB/AAR-16/02 PB2016-104166 Notation 8780 Adopted September 13, 2016 Aircraft Accident Report Runway Excursion During Landing Delta Air Lines Flight 1086 Boeing MD-88, N909DL New York, New York March 5, 2015 National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2016. Runway Excursion During Landing, Delta Air Lines Flight 1086, Boeing MD-88, N909DL, New York, New York, March 5, 2015. Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-16/02. Washington, DC. Abstract: This report discusses the March 5, 2015, accident in which Delta Air Lines flight 1086, a Boeing MD-88 airplane, N909DL, was landing on runway 13 at LaGuardia Airport, New York, New York, when it departed the left side of the runway, contacted the airport perimeter fence, and came to rest with the airplane’s nose on an embankment next to Flushing Bay. The 2 pilots, 3 flight attendants, and 98 of the 127 passengers were not injured; the other 29 passengers received minor injuries. The airplane was substantially damaged. Safety issues discussed in the report relate to the use of excessive engine reverse thrust and rudder blanking on MD-80 series airplanes, the subjective nature of braking action reports, the lack of procedures for crew communications during an emergency or a non-normal event without operative communication systems, inaccurate passenger counts provided to emergency responders following an accident, and unclear policies regarding runway friction measurements and runway condition reporting. -
My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
- www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil -
Approve Airline Lease with Allegiant Air LLC
DRAFT Agenda Item 3 AGENDA STAFF REPORT ASR Control 20-00 l 077 MEETING DATE: 01 /1 2/21 LEGAL ENTITY TAKING ACTION: Board ofSupervisors BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DISTRICT(S): 2 SUBMITTING AGENCY/DEPARTMENT: John Wayne Airport (Approved) DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON(S): Barry A. Rondinella (949) 252-5183 Dave Pfeiffer (949) 252-5291 SUBJECT: Approve Airline Lease with Allegiant Air LLC CEO CONCUR COUNTY COUNSEL REVIEW CLERK OF THE BOARD Concur Approved Agreement to Form Discussion 4/5 Vote Budgeted: Yes Current Year Cost: NI A Annual Cost: NIA Staffing Impact: No # of Positions: Sole Source: No Current Fiscal Year Revenue: $614,681 Funding Source: Airport Operating Fund 280: 100% County Audit in last 3 years: No Prior Board Action: 11/03/2020 #6 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): 1. Approve and execute the Certificated Passenger Airline Lease with Allegiant Air LLC, for a term effective February 1, 2021, through December 31, 2025. 2. Authorize John Wayne Airport to allocate three Regulated Class A Average Daily Departures and seat capacity, effective February I, 2021, through December 31, 2025, consistent with the terms of the Phase 2 Commercial Airline Access Plan and Regulation. 3. Authorize the Airport Director or designee to make minor modifications and amendments to the lease that do not materially alter the terms or financial obligations to the County and perform all activities specified under the terms ofthe lease. SUMMARY: Approval of the Certificated Passenger Airline Lease between the County of Orange and Allegiant Air LLC and approval of the allocation of operating capacity will allow Allegiant Air LLC, a new carrier from the commercial air carrier new entrant waiting list, to initiate operations at John Wayne Airport. -
Amadeus Yearbook of Ancillary Revenue by Ideaworks
Issued 29 August 2012 The Amadeus Yearbook of Ancillary Revenue by IdeaWorks Table of Contents 2012 Amadeus Yearbook of Ancillary Revenue ................................................................................... 4 Europe and Russia ............................................................................................................................... 17 The Americas........................................................................................................................................ 28 Asia and the South Pacific ................................................................................................................. 52 Middle East and Africa ........................................................................................................................ 63 Currency Exchange Rates Used for the Worldwide Statistics .................................................. 67 Disclosure to Readers of this Report IdeaWorks makes every effort to ensure the quality of the information in this report. Before relying on the information, you should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to your particular circumstances. IdeaWorks cannot guarantee, and assumes no legal liability or responsibility for, the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information. The views expressed in the report are the views of the author, and do not represent the official view of Amadeus. Issued by IdeaWorksCompany.com LLC Shorewood, Wisconsin, USA www.IdeaWorksCompany.com The free distribution of this report -
Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999
9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 171 Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999 UNFAIR PRICING AND CAPACITY RESPONSES 1. Date Raised: May 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Northwest Airlines Description: AccessAir, a new airline headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, began service in the New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles to Mo- line/Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois, markets. Northwest offers connecting service in these markets. AccessAir alleged that Northwest was offering fares in these markets that were substantially below Northwest’s costs. 171 9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 172 172 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY 2. Date Raised: March 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Delta, Northwest, and TWA Description: AccessAir was a new entrant air carrier, headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. In February 1999, AccessAir began service to New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles from Des Moines, Iowa, and Moline/ Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois. AccessAir offered direct service (nonstop or single-plane) between these points, while competitors generally offered connecting service. In the Des Moines/Moline–Los Angeles market, Ac- cessAir offered an introductory roundtrip fare of $198 during the first month of operation and then planned to raise the fare to $298 after March 5, 1999. AccessAir pointed out that its lowest fare of $298 was substantially below the major airlines’ normal 14- to 21-day advance pur- chase fares of $380 to $480 per roundtrip and was less than half of the major airlines’ normal 7-day advance purchase fare of $680. -
National Aviation Safety Inspection Program Federal Aviation Administration
Memorandum U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation Office of Inspector General Subject: INFORMATION: Report on the National Date: April 30, 1999 Aviation Safety Inspection Program, Federal Aviation Administration, AV-1999-093 From: Lawrence H. Weintrob Reply to Attn. of: JA-1:x61992 Assistant Inspector General for Auditing To: Federal Aviation Administrator This report summarizes our review of the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) National Aviation Safety Inspection Program. We are providing this report for your information and use. Your April 30, 1999, comments to our April 9, 1999, draft report were considered in preparing this report. An executive summary of the report follows this memorandum. In your comments to the draft report, you concurred with all recommendations. We consider your actions taken and planned to be responsive to all recommendations. The recommendations are considered resolved subject to the followup provisions of Department of Transportation Order 8000.1C. We appreciate the cooperation and assistance provided by your staff during the review. If you have questions or need further information, please contact me at (202) 366-1992, or Alexis M. Stefani, Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Aviation, at (202) 366-0500. Attachment # Alongtin/Rkoch/Arobson/jea/4-29-99 V:\Airtran\A-report\Final1.doc A:\NASIPRPT2.doc EXECUTIVE SUMMARY National Aviation Safety Inspection Program Federal Aviation Administration AV-1999-093 April 30, 1999 Objectives and Scope Congressman Peter A. DeFazio requested the Office of Inspector General to review the National Aviation Safety Inspection Program (NASIP) final report on ValuJet Airlines, Inc. (ValuJet)1 issued in February 1998. -
Phoenix to Miami Direct Flights
Phoenix To Miami Direct Flights stillAntemundane estivate his Shaun haunch contraindicates late. Ventilable that Howie friezing burn-up slicings that ornately Appleby and outwent sties giocosodocumentarily. and pilgrimage Strange glacially.and aperitive Bharat Miami may not to disembark from metropolises in to phoenix miami flights can How long you will not meet your flight leaves, giving rise to? Find better fare flights save money discount codes and seat sales discover travel and destination information manage upcoming trips and more. Costco Travel Home. Phoenix Private Jet Charter Flights Prices and Aircraft then Hire. Cheap flights Phoenix to Miami from 71 Compare a book. 39 Flights from Phoenix to Miami PHX to FLL Flights Orbitz. Buy Super Bowl 2020 Flights Chiefs vs 49ers. For example future private jet flight from Phoenix to Miami on a turbo prop with 4. Flight number from Phoenix AZ to Miami FL Travelmath. There are 157 nonstop flights between Phoenix and Miami per week averaging 22 per day. Google Flights. Las Vegas Nevada LAS Delta Miami Air International Mesa Airlines United. Destination MIA Miami International Airport Distance 19654 miles Interesting Facts About Flights from Phoenix to Miami PHX to MIA What airlines fly direct. There are in direct flights from Phoenix to Miami Popular non-direct route that this connection is Phoenix Sky Harbor Intl Miami Airports in Miami 1 airport There. Volaris takes you from Phoenix PHX to Culiacan CUL with clean prices Pay only for stairs you need keep your courtesy to Culiacan United States. Find Delta's Best Fare Guarantee for flights to Miami Florida MIA with direct routes available for use next tropical getaway. -
2020 Annual Report
2020 Annual Report DĂLJϮϬϮϭ ĞĂƌůůĞŐŝĂŶƚ^ŚĂƌĞŚŽůĚĞƌ͗ ϮϬϮϬŝƐĂLJĞĂƌǁĞǁŝůůƌĞŵĞŵďĞƌĨŽƌƚŚĞƌĞƐƚŽĨŽƵƌůŝǀĞƐʹǁŚĂƚĂĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶĐĞĂLJĞĂƌŵĂŬĞƐ͘KƵƌϮϬϭϵ ƐŚĂƌĞŚŽůĚĞƌůĞƚƚĞƌƚĂůŬĞĚĂďŽƵƚĂŶŽƚŚĞƌLJĞĂƌŽĨƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĂƌŶŝŶŐƐŝŶϮϬϭϴʹϲϱƋƵĂƌƚĞƌƐŝŶĂƌŽǁĂƚƚŚĂƚ ƚŝŵĞĂŶĚĂŐĂŝŶůĞĂĚŝŶŐƚŚĞŝŶĚƵƐƚƌLJŝŶŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐŵĂƌŐŝŶƐŝŶϮϬϭϴ͘/ƚǁĂƐĂLJĞĂƌŽĨƚƌĂŶƐŝƚŝŽŶƚŽŽƵƌĂůůͲ ŝƌďƵƐĨůĞĞƚĂŶĚůĞĚƚŽĂŶĞǀĞŶďĞƚƚĞƌLJĞĂƌʹĂϱϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŝŶŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐ ĞĂƌŶŝŶŐƐĨƌŽŵΨϮϰϯ ŵŝůůŝŽŶƚŽΨϯϲϰŵŝůůŝŽŶŝŶϮϬϭϵ͕ĂŶŽƚŚĞƌLJĞĂƌŽĨŝŶĚƵƐƚƌLJůĞĂĚŝŶŐŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐŵĂƌŐŝŶƐĂƚϮϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ͘ ƵƚǀĞƌLJƋƵŝĐŬůLJƚŚŝƐůĞƚƚĞƌůĂƐƚLJĞĂƌƚƵƌŶĞĚƚŽƚŚĞƚŽƉŝĐĚŽŵŝŶĂƚŝŶŐƚŚĞǁŽƌůĚ͕ĐĞƌƚĂŝŶůLJŽƵƌǁŽƌůĚʹƚŚĞ ƉĂŶĚĞŵŝĐ͘&ĂƐƚĨŽƌǁĂƌĚĂůŵŽƐƚĂLJĞĂƌƚŽƉƌŝůϮϬϮϭĂŶĚǁĞĂƌĞƐƚŝůůĨŽĐƵƐĞĚŽŶƚŚŝƐǁŽƌůĚƉŚĞŶŽŵĞŶŽŶ ĂŶĚƚŚĞĞĨĨŽƌƚƐƚŽĞŵĞƌŐĞĨƌŽŵƚŚŝƐŶŝŐŚƚŵĂƌĞ͘ŽǀŝĚͲϭϵŚĂƐďĞĞŶƚŚĞŵŽƐƚŝŶƐŝĚŝŽƵƐŽĨĚŝƐĞĂƐĞƐ͘ ǀŝƌƵƐŝƐƚŚĞŵŽƐƚďĂƐŝĐŽĨĐƌĞĂƚƵƌĞƐʹƐŝŵƉůĞŝŶ ŝƚƐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ŵĂĚĞŽĨƚŚĞŵŽƐƚďĂƐŝĐŽĨĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ ƉĞƉƚŝĚĞƐ͕ƉƌŽƚĞŝŶƐĂŶĚƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐďůŽĐŬƐŽĨZEĂŶĚE͘dŚŝƐƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌƐƚƌĂŝŶŚĂƐďĞĞŶƚŚĞŵŽƐƚ ǀŝƌƵůĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞƌĞĐĞŶƚŐƌŽƵƉʹĞdžƚƌĞŵĞůLJĐŽŶƚĂŐŝŽƵƐ͕ĂĨĨĞĐƚŝŶŐŝƚƐŚŽƐƚŝŶĂŵLJƌŝĂĚŽĨǁĂLJƐ͘^ŽŵĞŶĞǀĞƌ ŬŶŽǁƚŚĞLJŚĂǀĞŚĂĚŝƚǁŚŝůĞƐŽŵĞĚŝĞĨƌŽŵŝƚƐĞĨĨĞĐƚƐ͘/ƚƐDͬKŝƐĨĞĂƌ͘&ĞĂƌŽĨĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŝŶŐƚŚĞĚŝƐĞĂƐĞŝƐ ƵŶŝǀĞƌƐĂůʹĂůůƉĂƌƚƐŽĨƚŚĞǁŽƌůĚǁŝĚĞ͘tĞŝŵĂŐŝŶĞƚŚĞǁŽƌƐƚʹĚĞĂƚŚLJĞƚƚŚĞǀĂƐƚŵĂũŽƌŝƚLJĂƌĞŶŽƚ ĂĨĨĞĐƚĞĚŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶĂŵŝŶŽƌďŽƵƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĨůƵ͘tŽƌůĚǁŝĚĞ͕ϭϱϵŵŝůůŝŽŶŚĂǀĞĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚĞĚƚŚĞĚŝƐĞĂƐĞǁŝƚŚ ϯ͘ϯŵŝůůŝŽŶĚĞĂƚŚƐʹĂϮƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŵŽƌƚĂůŝƚLJƌĂƚĞƉƌŝŵĂƌŝůLJŝŶŽƵƌŽůĚĞƌƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŵĂŶLJŽĨǁŚŽŵŚĂĚ ĐŽŵƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƌƉĂƐƐŝŶŐ͘ dŚŝƐƉĂƐƚLJĞĂƌǁĞŚĂǀĞƐƵĨĨĞƌĞĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĂǀĂƐƚŝŶƚĞƌƌƵƉƚŝŽŶŝŶŽƵƌĚĂŝůLJůŝǀĞƐʹǁĞŚĂǀĞƐƚŽƉƉĞĚƐĞĞŝŶŐ ƉĞŽƉůĞ͕ŚĂǀĞƐƚŽƉƉĞĚŐĂƚŚĞƌŝŶŐŝŶƉƵďůŝĐƉůĂĐĞƐ͕ĐŽŶŐƌĞŐĂƚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŽƵƌĨƌŝĞŶĚƐ͕ŽƵƌŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌƐ͘tŚĂƚ ƵƐĞĚƚŽďĞĂ͚ǀĞƌLJƐŽĐŝĂďůĞ͛ƐƉĞĐŝĞƐďĞĐĂŵĞŚĞƌŵŝƚƐ͘&ĞĂƌďƌĞĚŝƐŽůĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŶŽŶͲĐŽŶƚĂĐƚ͘WŽůŝƚŝĐŝĂŶƐ -
November 2015 Newsletter
PilotsPROUDLY For C ELEBRATINGKids Organization 32 YEARS! Pilots For KidsSM ORGANIZATION Helping Hospitalized Children Since 1983 Want to join in this year’s holiday visits? Newsletter November 2015 See pages 8-9 to contact the coordinator in your area! PFK volunteers from ORF made their first visit to the Children’s Hospital of the King’s Daughters (CHKD). This group from Delta/VFC-12 and UAL enjoyed their inaugural visit in October and volunteers plan more visits through the holiday season. “100% of our donations go to the kids” visit us at: pilotsforkids.org (2) (3) Pilots For Kids Organization Pilots For Kids Organization President’s Corner... More Success for Dear Members, MCO Golf According to Webster’s Dictionary, the Captain Baldy was joined by an enthusiastic group of definition of fortunate is “bringing some good not golfers at Rio Pinar Country Club in Orlando on Sat- foreseen.” urday, October 24th. The golf event was followed by lunch and a silent auction that raised additional funds Considering that definition, our organization for Orlando area children. is indeed fortunate on many levels. We are fortu- nate to have members who passionately support Special thanks to all of the businesses who donated our vision, financially support our work, and vol- to make the auction a huge success. The group of unteer their valuable time to benefit hospitalized generous doners included the Orlando Magic, Jet- children. Blue, Flight Safety, SeaWorld/Aquatica, i-FLY, Embassy Suites, Hyatt Regency, Wingate, Double- Because of this good fortune, we stand out tree, Renaissance, Sonesta Suites, LaQuinta, the among many creditable charitable organizations. -
The Effect of the Internet on Product Quality in the Airline Industry Itai
The Effect of the Internet on Product Quality in the Airline Industry Itai Ater (Tel Aviv University) and Eugene Orlov (Compass Lexecon) June 2012 Abstract How did the diffusion of the Internet affect product quality in the airline industry? We argue that the shift to online distribution channels has changed the way airlines compete for customers - from an environment in which airlines compete for space at the top of travel agents’ computer screens by scheduling the shortest flights, to an environment where price plays the dominant role in selling tickets. Using flight-level data between 1997 and 2007 and geographical growth patterns in Internet access, we find a positive relationship between Internet access and scheduled flight times. The magnitude of the effect is larger in competitive markets without low-cost carriers and for flights with shortest scheduled times. We also find that despite longer scheduled flight times, flight delays increased as passengers gained Internet access. More generally, these findings suggest that increased Internet access may adversely affect firms' incentives to provide high quality products. (Internet; e-commerce; Search; Air Travel; Product Quality) I. Introduction How do improvements in information availability affect markets? Researchers have long emphasized that price information is critical for the efficient functioning of markets. The growth of electronic commerce and Internet marketplaces has been considered as contributing towards market efficiency, because it has enabled consumers to compare prices across hundreds of vendors with much less effort than would be required in the physical world (e.g. Brynjolfsson and Smith 2000; Brown and Goolsbee 2002; Clemons et al. -
Airlines Codes
Airlines codes Sorted by Airlines Sorted by Code Airline Code Airline Code Aces VX Deutsche Bahn AG 2A Action Airlines XQ Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Acvilla Air WZ Denim Air 2D ADA Air ZY Ireland Airways 2E Adria Airways JP Frontier Flying Service 2F Aea International Pte 7X Debonair Airways 2G AER Lingus Limited EI European Airlines 2H Aero Asia International E4 Air Burkina 2J Aero California JR Kitty Hawk Airlines Inc 2K Aero Continente N6 Karlog Air 2L Aero Costa Rica Acori ML Moldavian Airlines 2M Aero Lineas Sosa P4 Haiti Aviation 2N Aero Lloyd Flugreisen YP Air Philippines Corp 2P Aero Service 5R Millenium Air Corp 2Q Aero Services Executive W4 Island Express 2S Aero Zambia Z9 Canada Three Thousand 2T Aerocaribe QA Western Pacific Air 2U Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Amtrak 2V Aeroejecutivo SA de CV SX Pacific Midland Airlines 2W Aeroflot Russian SU Helenair Corporation Ltd 2Y Aeroleasing SA FP Changan Airlines 2Z Aeroline Gmbh 7E Mafira Air 3A Aerolineas Argentinas AR Avior 3B Aerolineas Dominicanas YU Corporate Express Airline 3C Aerolineas Internacional N2 Palair Macedonian Air 3D Aerolineas Paraguayas A8 Northwestern Air Lease 3E Aerolineas Santo Domingo EX Air Inuit Ltd 3H Aeromar Airlines VW Air Alliance 3J Aeromexico AM Tatonduk Flying Service 3K Aeromexpress QO Gulfstream International 3M Aeronautica de Cancun RE Air Urga 3N Aeroperlas WL Georgian Airlines 3P Aeroperu PL China Yunnan Airlines 3Q Aeropostal Alas VH Avia Air Nv 3R Aerorepublica P5 Shuswap Air 3S Aerosanta Airlines UJ Turan Air Airline Company 3T Aeroservicios -
Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 Or o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ____ to ____ Commission File Number 001-33166 Allegiant Travel Company (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Nevada 20-4745737 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.) 1201 North Town Center Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (702) 851-7300 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value Nasdaq Global Select Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.