DOCSLIB.ORG

Scaling up Nutrition Phase Ii Newsletter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scaling up Nutrition Phase Ii Newsletter SCALING UP NUTRITION PHASE II NEWSLETTER In this edition SUN II UPDATES Key developments in the last 12 months FIELD VISIT IN FOCUS Highlights of trip to Mongu and Kalabo districts in Western Province ELSEWHERE IN SUN Updates from SUN TA and GIZ FANSER First Edition 2020 Implemented by: Government of the Republic of Zambia 2 SUN II Newsletter • First Edition 2020 Welcome remarks Acting NFNC Executive Director – Mr Musonda J. Mofu elcome to the first edition of the Scaling Up the multisectoral District Nutrition Coordination Nutrition Phase II (SUN II) Newsletter! We Committees, which are a critical part of the Ware happy that we now have this platform coordination structure in the 17 SUN II districts. for sharing what is happening in the UN (UNICEF, Despite the pandemic, SUN II has conducted WHO, WFP, FAO) supported initiative, supporting the mapping and gap analysis at district level, followed 1,000 Most Critical Days programme, and generously by the development of one-year costed district funded by the European Union and the governments plans. All districts have used the same planning tools of the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland, Sweden to standardize and harmonize planning. and the UK. We are also delighted that this Newsletter provides updates on SUN TA and GIZ Fanser as we There are several differences between SUN phase I work in harmony towards a common goal – reducing and SUN II. These include enhanced implementation stunting in Zambia. NFNC is the national body strategies that promote comprehensive high impact coordinating the Scaling up Nutrition Programme nutrition interventions, converging on the 1,000 Days as part of our mandate of coordination and as Households, supported by a strong social behaviour the advisory wing of the government on matters change communication strategy. The programme pertaining to food and nutrition. has also included support to adolescent girls (10-19 years). In the past few months, I have been able to witness how all the stakeholders are committed to the SUN Phase 1 proved to be a great learning ground programme – this is despite the COVID-19 pandemic for all of us and has made it possible for us to which has engulfed the world. Amid the pandemic, come up with SUN II, which we hope will result NFNC and the ministries have been working to put in further reduction in stunting in the country. I things in place that will facilitate implementation want to commend all the stakeholders and all our of the programme, including the recruitment of cooperating partners for this great initiative. technical staff such as a Nutritionist, Capacity Building We look forward to the improvement in nutrition Officer, M&E Officer, Advocacy and Social Behaviour indicators as we move forward together! Change Communication Officer and District Nutrition Coordinators. The District Nutrition Support Coordinators support the District Commissioner’s office to convene J.MOFU About SUN II Scaling Up Nutrition Phase II (SUN II) is a four-year programme (2019-2023) supported by the United Nations (UNICEF, WHO, WFP, FAO) and funded by the European Union (EU), the Federal Republic of Germany through the KfW Development Bank, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) and UK aid from the British people. Lead UN agency UNICEF works in support of the government line ministries and the National Food and Nutrition Commission (NFNC), as well as with non-governmental organizations (NGOs). SUN II delivers a multi-sectoral package of nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions, adopting coordinated approaches for service delivery to achieve impact on stunting by focusing on households with adolescent girls, pregnant women, breastfeeding women, children under 2 years of age, and women of reproductive age. SUN II aims to reduce stunting in children under two by 7 per cent by focusing on these ‘1,000 Days Households.’ Zambia joined the SUN movement in 2010 and in 2013 launched the first 1,000 Most Critical Days Programme (MCDP I) as its blueprint for reducing stunting. The first phase of the SUN-supported MCDP I was from 2013-2017, with an interim period 2018-2019. SUN II Newsletter • First Edition 2020 3 UNICEF, USAID, GIZ and SNV A Harmonized Approach in Support of Scaling-Up Nutrition ased on an understanding of the determinants of malnutrition in Zambia and guided by discussions with NFNC and relevant government line ministries, SUN II has targeted 17 districts with a core package of Bhigh-impact nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions. The 17 districts being supported by UNICEF are Chipata, Lundazi, Chiengi, Chinsali, Isoka, Mpika, Chongwe, Lusaka, Mwinilunga, Solwezi, Zambezi, Choma, Monze, Kalabo, Kaoma, Mongu and Shangombo districts. Under MCDP Phase II, the Government of Zambia (GRZ is building on national momentum around stunting reduction in 37 high priority districts, 17 of which will be administered by the United Nations. Of the 37 focus districts, 13 are supported through USAID under the Scaling Up Nutrition Technical Assistance (SUN TA) programme; four by the German government through GIZ’s Food and Nutrition Security, Enhanced Resilience (FANSER) programme; 17 by UNICEF in support of MCDP II with technical assistance from FAO, WHO and WFP; and six (three overlapping) by SNV under the FCDO- supported Scaling Sustainable Nutrition for All (SN4A) programme. Implementation principles are based on equity, impact and value for money; the learning and evaluation components will be supported by the USAID-funded SUN Learning & Evaluation (L&E) programme. UN District Project Area USAID District Project Area GIZ District Project Area SNV District Project Area SUN Phase II will ensure coherence with initiatives supported by other donors and cooperating partners for expanded coverage and stronger outcomes. Specifically, SUN Phase II will coordinate with USAID’s SUN TA and SUN LE, SNV’s Scaling SN4A, and GIZ’s FANSER to harmonize approaches, tools and resources for planning, implementation, management and monitoring of MCDP II activities funded under SUN across the initial 37 districts. A “rooftop” agreement was developed to guide collaboration between UNICEF, USAID, SNV and GIZ SUN activities. Parties to the roof-top agreement will meet regularly to review collective efforts and prioritize actions. 4 SUN II Newsletter • First Edition 2020 SUN II Aims to Achieve Four Key Results by 2023 Sustained practice of optimal nutrition behaviours amongst adolescents, pregnant women, mothers and caregivers of children under two Sustained demand for and use of agriculture, health and WASH interventions for adolescents, pregnant women, mothers and caregivers of children under two and communities Quality nutrition information is used by communities, government and partners for evidence- based decisions, action and advocacy. Sustained commitment by government and partners for accountable nutrition governance Lessons learned from the first phase Promising results were achieved during MCDP I/SUN Phase I in terms of improving the knowledge and practices related to dietary intake, breastfeeding practices and consumption of nutrient-rich food. Reduction in the prevalence of diarrhoea was also evident. However, there were several lessons learned that SUN II will have to address in order to achieve the desired impact in stunting reduction. Drawing from these lessons, the following principles will be applied in the next steps: 1. Stronger vertical coordination for more responsive nutrition interventions: Under SUN II, greater effort will be focused on engaging districts, wards and communities in planning, implementation and monitoring nutrition interventions. 2. Increased exposure of households to multiple nutrition interventions: Though stunting reduction requires improvements across multiple sectors, including agriculture, WASH, health, nutrition and women’s empowerment, only a small percentage of MCDP I households benefitted from interventions across all sectors. SUN II emphasizes greater convergence of multiple nutrition-sensitive and nutrition- specific interventions, which requires more systematic targeting of households with pregnant and lactating women and children under two – and reaching these households with multiple interventions. 3. Build on successful social and behaviour change strategies: By working through community platforms such as Care Groups, health centres, schools and communities, MCDP I achieved positive changes in breastfeeding practices, nutrition and health knowledge, WASH behaviours and agricultural practice to enhance consumption of diversified food. SUN II builds on these successes by employing a coordinated social and behaviour change communication campaign, informed by formative research conducted by UNICEF in 2019 and drawing from relevant formative research conducted by UN agencies and donor- funded programmes. The campaign will expand communication avenues through religious, traditional and community leaders. 4. Strengthen management systems to facilitate service delivery: Weak financial management and inefficient financial flows from national to sub-national levels created bottlenecks around the ability to harmonize service delivery across line ministries under MCDP I. SUN II activities will build the programme and financial management capacity of DNCCs and line ministries to develop accurate budgets aligned to work plans through needs-based on-site coaching and mentorship, with support from NGOs. SUN II Newsletter • First Edition 2020 5 How SUN Phase II
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CHIEFS and the STATE in INDEPENDENT ZAMBIA Exploring the Zambian National Press
    CHIEFS AND THE STATE IN INDEPENDENT ZAMBIA Exploring the Zambian National Press •J te /V/- /. 07 r s/ . j> Wim van Binsbergen Introduction In West African countries such as Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone, chiefs have successfully entered the modern age, characterized by the independent state and its bureaucratie institutions, peripheral capitalism and a world-wide electronic mass culture. There, chiefs are more or less conspicuous both in daily life, in post-Independence literary products and even in scholarly analysis. In the first analysis, the Zambian situation appears to be very different. After the späte of anthropological research on chiefs in the colonial era,1 post-Independence historical research has added précision and depth to the scholarly insight concerning colonial chiefs and the precolonial rulers whose royal or aristocratie titles the former had inherited, as well as those (few) cases where colonial chieftaincies had been downright invented for the sake of con- venience and of systemic consistence all over the territory of the then Northern Rhodesia. But precious little has been written on the rôle and performance of Zambian chiefs öfter Independence. A few recent regional studies offer useful glances at chiefly affairs in 1. The colonial anthropological contribution to the study of Zambian chieftainship centered on, the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute and the Manchester School, and included such classic studies of chieftainship as Barnes 1954; Cunnison 1959; Gluckman 1943, 1967; Richards 1935; Watson 1958. Cf. Werbner 1984 for a recent appraisal. e Copyright 1987 - Wim van Binsbergen - 139 - CHIEFS IN INDEPENDENT ZAMBIA Wim van Binsbergen selected rural districts,2 but by and large they fail to make the link with the national level they concentrât« on the limited number of chiefs of the région under study.
    [Show full text]
  • National Health Insurance Management Authority
    NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY LIST OF ACCREDITED HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS AS OF SEPTEMBER 2021 Type of Facility Physical Address (Govt, Private, S/N Provider Name Service Type Province District Faith Based) 1 Liteta District Hospital Hospital Central Chisamba Government 2 Chitambo District Hospital Hospital Central Chitambo Government 3 Itezhi-tezhi District Hospital Hospital Central Itezhi tezhi Government 4 Kabwe Central Hospital Hospital Central Kabwe Government 5 Kabwe Women, Newborn & Children's HospHospital Central Kabwe Government 6 Kapiri Mposhi District Hospital Hospital Central Kapiri Mposhi Government 7 Mkushi District Hospital Hospital Central Mkushi Government 8 Mumbwa District Hospital Hospital Central Mumbwa Government 9 Nangoma Mission Hospital Hospital Central Mumbwa Faith Based 10 Serenje District Hospital Hospital Central Serenje Government 11 Kakoso 1st Level Hospital Hospital Copperbelt Chililabombwe Government 12 Nchanga North General Hospital Hospital Copperbelt Chingola Government 13 Kalulushi General Hospital Hospital Copperbelt Kalulushi Government 14 Kitwe Teaching Hospital Hospital Copperbelt Kitwe. Government 15 Roan Antelope General Hospital Hospital Copperbelt Luanshya Government 16 Thomson District Hospital Hospital Copperbelt Luanshya Government 17 Lufwanyama District Hospital Hospital Copperbelt Lufwanyama Government 18 Masaiti District Hospital Hospital Copperbelt Masaiti Government 19 Mpongwe Mission Hospital Hospital Copperbelt Mpongwe Faith Based 20 St. Theresa Mission Hospital Hospital
    [Show full text]
  • ZAMBIA Livelihoods Assessment June 2007
    ZAMBIA Livelihoods Assessment June 2007 www.crs.org ZAMBIA Livelihoods Assessment June 2007 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors of the Livelihoods Assessment Report: John Service, Cecilia Adalla, James Campbell and Sinya Mbale Field teams: Ndola District Sesheke District Mongu District Team Leader Milika Zimba Sinya Mbale Patience Vilinga 1. Grant Mulenga 1. Hlobotha Nkunika 1. Geoff Heinrich Team Members 2. Cosmas E. Mulenga 2. Peter Ng’ona 2. Webby Kanjipite 3. Fr. Joseph Mutashala 3. Precious Kabutu 3. Albert Mulanda Training workshop participants: Trainers: Sinya Mbale, Yohannes Antonyo, Geoff Heinrich Participants: Webby Kanjipite, Hlobotha Nkhunika, Milika Zimba, Mwenya Chewe, Joseph Mutashala, Albert Mulanda, Cosmas E. Mulenga Thanks to Harvest Help Zambia for Community facilitation in Siavonga District for pre-testing of the process guide. Many thanks to Siamatika Village in Siavonga. Additional thanks to: Dioceses of Livingstone, Mongu and Ndola for making this assessment possible and putting in the long field hours; All six villages assessed for their patient participation and informative contributions; Madeleine Smith for assisting with the assessment results compilation; The team that was sequestered for three days of intense results analysis – Sinya Mbale, Milika Zimba, Grants Mulenga, Bwendo Kabanda, Phanuel Madebvu, Peter Ng’ona, Webby Kanjipite, James Campbell, John Service, Cecilia Adalla, Solomon Tesfamariam, Hlobotha Nkunika, Nayotu – facilitated ably by Mary Mulenga with rapporteur Kafula Mutale; Driss Moumane, Geoff Heinrich and Madeleine Smith for reviewing the report with their eagle eyes. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS. v. I. INTRODUCTION .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 II. MeThODOLOgY. .3. Geographic scope and site selection ..........................3 Secondary data sources . .................................4 III. LIMITATIONS. .5 IV. DISTRICT OVeRVIew .
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia USADF Country Portfolio
    Zambia USADF Country Portfolio Overview: Country program established in 1984 and reopened in U.S. African Development Foundation Partner Organization: Keepers Zambia 2004. USADF currently manages a portfolio of 23 projects and one Country Program Coordinator: Guy Kahokola Foundation (KZF) Cooperative Agreement. Total active commitment is $2.9 million. Suite 103 Foxdale Court Office Park Program Manager: Victor Makasa Agricultural investments total $2.6 million. Youth-led enterprise 609 Zambezi Road, Roma Tel: +260 211 293333 investments total $20,000. Lusaka, Zambia Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Country Strategy: The program focuses on support to agricultural enterprises, including organic farming as Zambia has been identified as a Feed the Future country. In addition, there are investments in off-grid energy and youth led-enterprises. Enterprise Duration Grant Size Description Mongu Dairy Cooperative Society 2012-2017 $152,381 Sector: Agriculture (Dairy) Limited Town/City: Mongu District in the Western Province 2705-ZMB Summary: The project funds will be used to increase the production and sales of milk through the purchase of improved breed cows, transportation, and storage equipment. Chibusa Home Based Care 2013-2018 $187,789 Sector: Agriculture (Food Processing) Association Town/City: Mungwi District in the Northern Province of Zambia 2925-ZMB Summary: The project funds will be used to provide working capital for purchasing grains, increase milling capacity, build a storage warehouse, and provide funds to improve marketing. Ushaa Area Farmers Association 2013-2018 $94,960 Sector: Agriculture (Rice) Limited Town/City: Mongu District in the Western Province of Zambia 2937-ZMB Summary: The project funds will be used to provide working capital for purchasing rice, build a storage warehouse, and provide funds to improve marketing.
    [Show full text]
  • Barotse Floodplain
    Public Disclosure Authorized REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA DETAILED ASSESSMENT, CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) STUDY Public Disclosure Authorized FOR THE IMPROVED USE OF PRIORITY TRADITIONAL CANALS IN THE BAROTSE SUB-BASIN OF THE ZAMBEZI ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT Public Disclosure Authorized ASSESSMENT Final Report October 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized 15 juillet 2004 BRL ingénierie 1105 Av Pierre Mendès-France BP 94001 30001 Nîmes Cedex5 France NIRAS 4128 , Mwinilunga Road, Sunningdale, Zambia Date July 23rd, 2014 Contact Eric Deneut Document title Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for the improved use of priority canals in the Barotse Sub-Basin of the Zambezi Document reference 800568 Code V.3 Date Code Observation Written by Validated by May 2014 V.1 Eric Deneut: ESIA July 2014 V.2 montage, Environmental baseline and impact assessment Charles Kapekele Chileya: Social Eric Verlinden October 2014 V.3 baseline and impact assessment Christophe Nativel: support in social baseline report ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVED USE OF PRIORITY TRADITIONAL CANALS IN THE BAROTSE SUB-BASIN OF THE ZAMBEZI Table of content 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 2 1.1 Background of the project 2 1.2 Summary description of the project including project rationale 6 1.2.1 Project rationale 6 1.2.2 Summary description of works 6 1.3 Objectives the project 7 1.3.1 Objectives of the Assignment 8 1.3.2 Objective of the ESIA 8 1.4 Brief description of the location 10 1.5 Particulars of Shareholders/Directors 10 1.6 Percentage of shareholding by each shareholder 10 1.7 The developer’s physical address and the contact person and his/her details 10 1.8 Track Record/Previous Experience of Enterprise Elsewhere 11 1.9 Total Project Cost/Investment 11 1.10 Proposed Project Implementation Date 12 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Livelihood Zones Analysis Zambia
    Improved livelihoods for smallholder farmers LIVELIHOOD ZONES ANALYSIS A tool for planning agricultural water management investments Zambia Prepared by Mukelabai Ndiyoi & Mwase Phiri, Farming Systems Association of Zambia (FASAZ), Lusaka, Zambia, in consultation with FAO, 2010 About this report The AgWater Solutions Project aimed at designing agricultural water management (AWM) strategies for smallholder farmers in sub Saharan Africa and in India. The project was managed by the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and operated jointly with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), the Stockholm Environmental Institute (SEI) and International Development Enterprise (IDE). It was implemented in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, Tanzania, Zambia and in the States of Madhya Pradesh and West Bengal in India. Several studies have highlighted the potential of AWM for poverty alleviation. In practice, however, adoption rates of AWM solutions remain low, and where adoption has taken place locally, programmes aimed at disseminating these solutions often remain a challenge. The overall goal of the project was to stimulate and support successful pro-poor, gender-equitable AWM investments, policies and implementation strategies through concrete, evidence-based knowledge and decision-making tools. The project has examined AWM interventions at the farm, community, watershed, and national levels. It has analyzed opportunities and constraints of a number of small-scale AWM interventions in several pilot research sites across the different project countries, and assessed their potential in different agro-climatic, socio-economic and political contexts. This report was prepared as part of the efforts to assess the potential for AWM solutions at national level.
    [Show full text]
  • Lukulu Districts Who Assisted with Collecting the Data Used to Develop These Profiles
    Focal community profiles for Barotse Hub, Zambia FOCAL COMMUNITY PROFILES FOR BAROTSE HUB, ZAMBIA Authors Benjamin Dierksmeier, Steven M. Cole and Teoh Shwu Jiau Citation This publication should be cited as: Dierksmeier B, Cole SM and Teoh SJ. 2015. Focal community profiles for Barotse Hub, Zambia. Penang, Malaysia: CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems. Program Report: AAS-2015-06. FOCAL COMMUNITY PROFILES FOR BAROTSE HUB, ZAMBIA HUB, FOCAL COMMUNITY PROFILES FOR BAROTSE Acknowledgments The authors extend appreciation to the many AAS stakeholders who contributed to the development of these community profiles, including the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock and Concern Worldwide staff and community facilitators in Mongu, Senanga, Kalabo and Lukulu districts who assisted with collecting the data used to develop these profiles. Above all, we thank the members of the 10 Barotse Hub focal communities who participated in this research. 2 CONTENTS List of figures 4 List of tables 5 List of maps 6 Acronyms and definitions 7 Introduction 8 Methodology 9 Content and structure of the document 9 Lukulu District 10 Kabula profile 10 Kapanda profile 17 Kalabo District 24 Mapungu profile 24 Mwandi profile 30 Mongu district 37 Nanikelako profile 37 Situlu profile 44 CONTENTS Lealui profile 50 Senanga District 56 Sifuna profile 56 Nembwele profile 63 Nalitoya profile 69 Notes 75 References 76 Annex 1. Villages that make up the 10 AAS focal communities, by district 77 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Marital status of household head, Kabula
    [Show full text]
  • Chiefdoms/Chiefs in Zambia
    CHIEFDOMS/CHIEFS IN ZAMBIA 1. CENTRAL PROVINCE A. Chibombo District Tribe 1 HRH Chief Chitanda Lenje People 2 HRH Chieftainess Mungule Lenje People 3 HRH Chief Liteta Lenje People B. Chisamba District 1 HRH Chief Chamuka Lenje People C. Kapiri Mposhi District 1 HRH Senior Chief Chipepo Lenje People 2 HRH Chief Mukonchi Swaka People 3 HRH Chief Nkole Swaka People D. Ngabwe District 1 HRH Chief Ngabwe Lima/Lenje People 2 HRH Chief Mukubwe Lima/Lenje People E. Mkushi District 1 HRHChief Chitina Swaka People 2 HRH Chief Shaibila Lala People 3 HRH Chief Mulungwe Lala People F. Luano District 1 HRH Senior Chief Mboroma Lala People 2 HRH Chief Chembe Lala People 3 HRH Chief Chikupili Swaka People 4 HRH Chief Kanyesha Lala People 5 HRHChief Kaundula Lala People 6 HRH Chief Mboshya Lala People G. Mumbwa District 1 HRH Chief Chibuluma Kaonde/Ila People 2 HRH Chieftainess Kabulwebulwe Nkoya People 3 HRH Chief Kaindu Kaonde People 4 HRH Chief Moono Ila People 5 HRH Chief Mulendema Ila People 6 HRH Chief Mumba Kaonde People H. Serenje District 1 HRH Senior Chief Muchinda Lala People 2 HRH Chief Kabamba Lala People 3 HRh Chief Chisomo Lala People 4 HRH Chief Mailo Lala People 5 HRH Chieftainess Serenje Lala People 6 HRH Chief Chibale Lala People I. Chitambo District 1 HRH Chief Chitambo Lala People 2 HRH Chief Muchinka Lala People J. Itezhi Tezhi District 1 HRH Chieftainess Muwezwa Ila People 2 HRH Chief Chilyabufu Ila People 3 HRH Chief Musungwa Ila People 4 HRH Chief Shezongo Ila People 5 HRH Chief Shimbizhi Ila People 6 HRH Chief Kaingu Ila People K.
    [Show full text]
  • Shangombo District Rapid Flood Impact Assessment Report March 2009
    SHANGOMBO DISTRICT RAPID FLOOD IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT MARCH 2009 VAC ZAMBIA Vulnerability Assessment Committee BY Zambia Vulnerability Assessment Committee (ZVAC) LUSAKA TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements............................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 4 1.0 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... 6 1.1. Overall Objective .......................................................................................... 6 1.2. Specific Objectives ........................................................................................ 6 2.0. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 6 2.1. Assessment Areas.......................................................................................... 6 2.2. Limitations to the Assessment...................................................................... 7 3.0. FINDINGS.............................................................................................................. 7 3.1. SIMU WARD ......................................................................................................... 7 3.1.1. Camp Site....................................................................................................... 8 3.1.2. Recommendations for Simu Ward- Mboiwa.............................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Zambia Quality Assurance Program Final Evaluation
    QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT EVALUATION REPORT The Zambia Quality Assurance Program Final Evaluation Center for Human Services • 7200 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 600 • Bethesda, MD 20814-4811 • USA ���������� ������������������������� ���������������� ���������������������� ��������������������� ������������������� ������������� ��������������� ������������ ������������������ ������������������������� �������������������������������� ����������������������� ������������������������������ ����������������� ��������������� �������� The authors are indebted to the Central Board of An evaluation of this nature could be threatening to Health (CBoH) staff for their assistance throughout the all stakeholders of the Quality Assurance Program in mission, both at a technical level and for secretarial Zambia, although the findings should relieve part of the assistance, physical facilities, transportation, and equip­ stress. The intentions of the evaluation team were to ment made available throughout the mission. Without draw lessons that could benefit both Zambia and other the efforts of the CBoH, the logistics would have un­ countries, as objectively as possible. In doing so, doubtedly been more challenging, and the output less achievements are recognized, and remaining challenges likely in the time available. Senior officials’ willingness are identified. Successes are praised, whereas failures to make themselves available at all times is recognized and shortcomings are addressed through constructive with considerable gratitude. The atmosphere of collabo­
    [Show full text]
  • Socioeconomic Status, Health Status and Health Equity: a Case Study of Zambian Households in Selected Areas
    SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS, HEALTH STATUS AND HEALTH EQUITY: A CASE STUDY OF ZAMBIAN HOUSEHOLDS IN SELECTED AREAS Chris N. Mwikisa & Venkatesh Seshamani Economics Department, University of Zambia A Study Commissioned by the Jesuit Center for Theological Reflection, Lusaka March 2003 Table of Contents Page Acknowledgements..............................................................................................................................v List of Acronyms................................................................................................................................vii List of Tables..................................................................................................................................... viii Chapter 1: Health Reforms in Zambia..........................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Health Reforms in Zambia........................................................................................................4 1.3 Report Structure........................................................................................................................ 7 Chapter 2: Methodology...................................................................................................................8 2.1 Study areas, Sample size and Data collection..........................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Food and Nutrition Security in the Barotse Floodplain System
    Food and Nutrition Security in the Barotse Floodplain System Pasqualino, M. & Kennedy, G. (Bioversity International) Longley, K. & Thilsted, S. H. (WorldFish) Table of Contents Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. 5 Terminologies .................................................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 7 The Barotse floodplain .................................................................................................................... 9 Overview of AAS communities ................................................................................................. 10 Kalabo District ........................................................................................................................ 10 Lukulu District ........................................................................................................................ 11 Mongu District ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]