Hamilton Train Station Schedule
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks -
Intercity Bus Transportation System and Its Competition in Malaysia
Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol.8, 2011 Intercity Bus Transportation System and its competition in Malaysia Bayu Martanto ADJI Angelalia ROZA PhD Candidate Masters Candidate Center for Transportation Research Center for Transportation Research Faculty of Engineering Faculty of Engineering University of Malaya University of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Fax: +603-79552182 Fax: +603-79552182 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Raja Syahira RAJA ABDUL AZIZ Mohamed Rehan KARIM Masters Candidate Professor Center for Transportation Research Center for Transportation Research Faculty of Engineering Faculty of Engineering University of Malaya University of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Fax: +603-79552182 Fax: +603-79552182 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Abstract : Intercity transportation in Malaysia is quite similar to other countries, which involve three kinds of modes, namely, bus, rail and air. Among these modes, bus transportation continues to be the top choice for intercity travelers in Malaysia. Bus offers more flexibility compared to the other transport modes. Due to its relatively cheaper fare as compared to the air transport, bus is more affordable to those with low income. However, bus transport service today is starting to face higher competition from rail and air transport due to their attractive factors. The huge challenge faced by intercity bus transport in Malaysia is the management of its services. The intercity bus transport does not fall under one management; unlike rail transport which is managed under Keretapi Tanah Melayu Berhad (KTMB), or air transport which is managed under Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad (MAHB). -
Transportation Improvement Program and FY2015-2026 Twelve-Year Program
FY2015-2026 TIP/TWELVE-YEAR PROJECT LISTING MPMS PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION MPMS PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION 14698 US 422 Roadway reconstruction (M2B). 73214 Ardmore Transit Center, high-level platforms, ADA, lighting, 16150 Tookany Cr. Pkwy. over Tookany Cr. shelters, signs, paving. 16214 PA 611 over SEPTA; replace state bridge. 74813 Ambler Pedestrian Sidewalk Improvements. 16216 Pennswood Rd. over Amtrak; replace local bridge. 74815 Upper Gwynedd curb & sidewalk reconstruction. 16239 New Hanover Sq. Rd. over Swamp Cr.; replace state bridge. 74817 PA 263 Hatboro Corridor safety improvements. 16248 Union Ave. over rail; replace local bridge. 74937 Whitemarsh Township Improvements; new curb, bumpouts, ADA ramps, ped x-ings. 16334 PA 73 at Greenwood Ave.; improve intersection. 77183 Conshohocken station improvements, high-level platforms; con- 16396 Church Rd. over NHSL; replace bridge. struct parking garage. 16400 Arcola Rd. over Perkiomen Cr.; replace county bridge. 77183 Modernize Hatboro station, improve accessibility. 16408 Fruitville Rd. over Perkiomen Cr.; replace county bridge. 77183 Jenkintown station, improve station building; high-level plat- FY2015-2018 16484 Edge Hill Rd. over PA 611; replace state bridge. forms, ADA accessibility. 16577 Ridge Pk. reconstruct, widen & upgrade signals Butler Pk. to Phila. 77183 Roslyn Station Improvements, modernize station; provide im- proved accessibility. 16599 PA 320 reconstruct & widen btw Arden & U. Gulph Rds. Transportation Improvement Program 77183 Willow Grove Station Improvements; to station building, high- 16610 Ashmead Rd. over Tookany Cr.; replace local bridge. level platforms, ADA accessibility. 16658 Old Forty Ft. Rd. over Skippack Cr.; replace state bridge. 77211 PA 309 Connector (Ph. 2), new road from Allentown Rd. and FY2015-2026 Twelve-Year Program 16705 Chester Valley Trail Ext. -
Diaries 1857-1917
1886 Friday, January 1 I am thousands of miles from home. church-one acre, too far out-and Suman went with Mr. Thompson takes me to Downey (Cal.) for the 7:00 him. Mr. Hayt came and we went out to look at the train, Bro. King having given out going with me. At Los addition which he is interested in & indicated that they Angeles, buy a ticket to Colton. Go up town-post of would give us a lot to build church on. Dine at Hall's. fice- up the hill-a way out. Call but do not see Reuben At 7:00 pr. at Suman's, Mark 8:36. Stay at Suman's. Rev. Baker. Go with Elisha Luke, wife, & Miss Jennie King & McKee! came. McComb to Colton & Riverside. Stay at Peter Suman's. Saturday, January 9 Visit the valley again with Bro. Saturday, January 2 Dine at Reuben Hall's. Luke's staid Suman, Revs. A.N. King & D. McKee!. Magnolia Ave., there last night & remained to-day. Go back to Peter 150 ft wide. At Shumaker's, climb butce. Dine at Henry Suman's having in forenoon called on Rev. Selah W Cole's. Hart's cluster-oranges. Ascend Rubidoux in the Brown, M.E. Pastor. Pr. at 7:00 at Y.M.C.A. Hall Eph afternoon (500 ft high) & see Santa Anna River, Arrow 2:4. Stay at Halls. Their children, Samuel aged 20, Wil head Mt., San Bernardino, & look on town & orange liam I 5, Harvey 12, George 7, and two married daugh groves. -
Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options
Advocacy Sustainability Partnerships Fort Washington Office Park Transportation Demand Management Plan Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options Prepared by GVF GVF July 2017 Contents Executive Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Sources ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 ArcMap Geocoding and Data Analysis .................................................................................................. 6 Travel Times Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 7 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Employee Commuter Survey Results ................................................................................................ 7 2. Office Park Companies Outreach Results ......................................................................................... 7 3. Office Park -
Comprehensive Citywide Ferry Study
This Ferry Service Feasibility Study was prepared for the New York Department of State with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund The study steering committee consisted of representatives of the NYHarborWay, the New York City Economic Development Corporation and the New York City Department of Transportation Paula Berry, Director, NYHarborWay Venetia Lannon, Senior Vice President, NYCEDC David Hopkins, Vice President, NYCEDC Adam Zaranko, Senior Project Manager, NYCEDC—Study Project Manager Katie Axt, Project Manager, NYCEDC Alejandro Baquero Cifuentes, Assistant Vice President, NYCEDC Ankur Datta, Assistant Vice President, NYCEDC Randi Press, Vice President, NYCEDC Alan Olmsted, Executive Director, Office of Private Ferries, NYC DOT The following consultants assisted in the preparation of the study: STV Inc. Molly McQueen, Vice President Appleseed Inc.—Lead Consultant Hugh O'Neill, President Jordan Anderson, Vice President Scott Hong, Senior Consultant Abby Fanelli, Senior Consultant Cassie Mehlum, Senior Consultant Nishita Dewan, Consultant Audience Research and Analysis George Wachtel, President Aline Chatmajian, Principal Zetlin Strategic Communications Alexandra Zetlin, President TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................21 PART ONE: COMMUTER FERRY SITE -
Rail Network Investment Programme
RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME JUNE 2021 Cover: Renewing aged rail and turnouts is part of maintaining the network. This page: Upgrade work on the commuter networks is an important part of the investment programme. 2 | RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME CONTENTS 1. Foreword 4 2. Introduction and approval 5 • Rail Network Investment Programme at a glance 3. Strategic context 8 4. The national rail network today 12 5. Planning and prioritising investment 18 6. Investment – national freight and tourism network 24 7. Investment – Auckland and Wellington metro 40 8. Other investments 48 9. Delivering on this programme 50 10. Measuring success 52 11. Investment programme schedules 56 RAIL NETWORK INVESTMENT PROGRAMME | 3 1. FOREWORD KiwiRail is pleased to present this This new investment approach marks a turning point that is crucial to securing the future of rail and unlocking its inaugural Rail Network Investment full potential. Programme. KiwiRail now has certainty about the projected role of rail Rail in New Zealand is on the cusp of in New Zealand’s future, and a commitment to provide an exciting new era. the funding needed to support that role. Rail has an increasingly important role to play in the This Rail Network Investment Programme (RNIP) sets out transport sector, helping commuters and products get the tranches of work to ensure the country has a reliable, where they need to go – in particular, linking workers resilient and safe rail network. with their workplaces in New Zealand’s biggest cities, and KiwiRail is excited about taking the next steps towards connecting the nation’s exporters to the world. -
A Comparative Analysis of High-Speed Rail Station Development Into Destination and Multi-Use Facilities: the Case of San Jose Diridon
MTI A Comparative Analysis of Funded by U.S. Department of Services Transit Census California of Water 2012 High-Speed Rail Station Transportation and California Department of Transportation Development into Destination and Multi-Use Facilities: The Case of San Jose Diridon MTI ReportMTI 12-02 December 2012 MTI Report 12-75 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF MNTRC Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) was established by Congress in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation MTI/MNTRC BOARD OF TRUSTEES Equity Act (ISTEA) and was reauthorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). MTI then successfully competed to be named a Tier 1 Center in 2002 and 2006 in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Founder, Honorable Norman Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2019) Richard A. White (Ex-Officio) Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Most recently, MTI successfully competed in the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011 to Mineta (Ex-Officio) Chief Executive Officer Principal and Chair of Board Interim President and CEO be named a Tier 1 Transit-Focused University Transportation Center. The Institute is funded by Congress through the United States Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Lea+Elliot, Inc. American Public Transportation Transportation Association (APTA) Department of Transportation’s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Vice Chair -
LOWER NORTH ISLAND LONGER-DISTANCE ROLLING STOCK BUSINESS CASE PREPARED for GREATER WELLINGTON REGIONAL COUNCIL 2 December 2019
LOWER NORTH ISLAND LONGER-DISTANCE ROLLING STOCK BUSINESS CASE PREPARED FOR GREATER WELLINGTON REGIONAL COUNCIL 2 December 2019 This document has been prepared for the benefit of Greater Wellington Regional Council. No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for an application for permission or approval to fulfil a legal requirement. QUALITY STATEMENT PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT TECHNICAL LEAD Doug Weir Doug Weir PREPARED BY Doug Weir, Andrew Liese CHECKED BY Jamie Whittaker, Doug Weir, Deepa Seares REVIEWED BY Jamie Whittaker, Phil Peet APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY Doug Weir WELLINGTON Level 13, 80 The Terrace, Wellington 6011 PO Box 13-052, Armagh, Christchurch 8141 TEL +64 4 381 6700 REVISION SCHEDULE Authorisation Rev Date Description No. Prepared Checked Reviewed Approved by by by by 1 27/07/18 First Draft Final DW, AL JW JW DW 2 24/10/18 Updated First Draft Final DW JW JW DW Revised Draft Final (GWRC 3 05/08/19 DW DW PP DW Sustainable Transport Committee) 3 20/08/19 Updated Revised Draft Final DW DS PP DW Amended Draft Final 4 26/09/19 DW DW PP DW (GWRC Council) 5 02/12/19 Final DW DW PP DW Stantec │ Lower North Island Longer-Distance Rolling Stock Business Case │ 2 December 2019 Status: Final │ Project No.: 310200204 │ Our ref: 310200204 191202 Lower North Island Longer-Distance Rolling Stock Busines Case - Final.docx Executive Summary Introduction This business case has been prepared by Stantec New Zealand and Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC), with input from key stakeholders including KiwiRail, Transdev, Horizons Regional Council and the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA), and economic peer review by Transport Futures Limited. -
Low Er M Anhattan
Down Is What's Up LOWER MANHATTAN Winter 2018 THEthe FROM THE PRESIDENT { dear neighbor} LOWDOWN This is the season for resolutions. Some are harder to keep than others. So, I would like to propose one that should not only be easy to keep, but fun: Spend more time exploring Lower Manhattan! Some neighborhoods are home to incredible history. Others have renowned museums and cultural institutions. There are those that offer the finest in dining and drinking. And still others with eye-catching architecture. We have all that and more. Lower Manhattan is the oldest neighborhood in New York City, rich with history. Walking our streets, you can retrace the footsteps of historical luminaries and game changers like George Washington, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Edison. When that walking around builds up an appetite, there are now tons of dining destinations to explore. From newer haunts like Federal Grille, Nobu, Augustine and Temple Court, to institutions like Delmonico’s, Harry’s and China Chalet, you won’t go hungry here. And if you just want to grab and go, you can hit places like Italian specialty shop Pisillo or the newest kid on the block, David Chang’s Fuku. If you are looking for a postprandial or happy hour hotspot, you could hang out in the taverns lining Stone Street, the award winning cocktail bar Black Tail, or Lower Manhattan’s newest subterranean bar and lounge, the Mailroom. Still not convinced to explore Lower Manhattan this year? Here’s one more KEEPING LM GREENER AND CLEANER reason: the best is yet to come. -
Report 01-107 Passenger Express Train 201 Derailment Otaihanga
Report 01-107 passenger express Train 201 derailment Otaihanga (near Paraparaumu) 6 June 2001 Abstract On Wednesday, 6 June 2001, at about 1841, express passenger Train 201 Overlander derailed when a wheel on the leading axle of the trailing bogie of the power van fractured as the train approached Otaihanga Road level crossing near Paraparaumu on the North Island Main Trunk. There were no injuries to train crew or passengers and damage was limited to the trailing bogie of the power van. The safety issue identified was the suitability of the wheel set for use in passenger rolling stock. As a result of the actions taken by the operator following this incident, no safety recommendations are included in this report. Contents Abbreviations................................................................................................................................................ii Data Summary .............................................................................................................................................iii 1. Factual Information ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Narrative ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Personnel........................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Locomotive controls, instruments and performance..................................................... -
Hokitika to Westport Tourist Rail Feasibility Study: Stop/Go Report
Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Overview ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Key Findings – Markets and Visitor Hubs ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Key Findings – Additional Factors to Drive Visitor Growth ............................................................................... 3 1.4. Key Findings – Financial Results ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.5. Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.6. Marketing Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1.7. Project Operational Risks .................................................................................................................................. 8 1.8. Financial Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.9. Summary Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................