34788 in the Supreme Court of Canada

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

34788 in the Supreme Court of Canada File Number: 34788 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO) BETWEEN: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Appellant (Respondent on Cross-Appeal) - and - TERRI JEAN BEDFORD, AMY LEBOVITCH and VALERIE SCOTT Respondents (Appellants on Cross-Appeal) - and - PIVOT LEGAL SOCIETY, DOWNTOWN EASTSIDE SEX WORKERS UNITED AGAINST VIOLENCE and PACE SOCIETY, THE SECRETARIAT OF THE JOINT UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON HIV/AIDS, THE BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION, THE EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA, THE CANADIAN HIV/AIDS LEGAL NETWORK, BRITISH COLUMBIA CENTRE FOR EXCELLENCE IN HIV/AIDS and HIV & AIDS LEGAL CLINIC ONTARIO , THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTRES, NATIVE WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION OF CANADA, CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF ELIZABETH FRY SOCIETIES, ACTION ONTARIENNE CONTRE LA VIOLENCE FAITE AUX FEMMES, CONCERTATION DES LUTTES CONTRE L'EXPLOITATION SEXUELLE, REGROUPEMENT QUÉBÉCOIS DES CENTRES D'AIDE ET DE LUTTE CONTRE LES AGRESSIONS À CARACTÈRE SEXUEL and VANCOUVER RAPE RELIEF SOCIETY, CHRISTIAN LEGAL FELLOWSHIP, CATHOLIC CIVIL RIGHTS LEAGUE and REAL WOMEN OF CANADA, THE DAVID ASPER CENTRE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, THE INSTITUT SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR, THE AWCEP ASIAN WOMEN FOR EQUALITY SOCIETY, OPERATING AS ASIAN WOMEN COALITION ENDING PROSTITUTION and THE ABORIGINAL LEGAL SERVICES OF TORONTO INC. Interveners AND BETWEEN: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Appellant (Respondent on Cross-Appeal) - and - TERRI JEAN BEDFORD, AMY LEBOVITCH and VALERIE SCOTT Respondents (Appellants on Cross-Appeal) - and - PIVOT LEGAL SOCIETY, DOWNTOWN EASTSIDE SEX WORKERS UNITED AGAINST VIOLENCE and PACE SOCIETY, THE SECRETARIAT OF THE JOINT UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON HIV/AIDS, THE BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION, THE EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA, THE CANADIAN HIV/AIDS LEGAL NETWORK, BRITISH COLUMBIA CENTRE FOR EXCELLENCE IN HIV/AIDS and HIV & AIDS LEGAL CLINIC ONTARIO , THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTRES, NATIVE WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION OF CANADA, CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF ELIZABETH FRY SOCIETIES, ACTION ONTARIENNE CONTRE LA VIOLENCE FAITE AUX FEMMES, CONCERTATION DES LUTTES CONTRE L'EXPLOITATION SEXUELLE, REGROUPEMENT QUÉBÉCOIS DES CENTRES D'AIDE ET DE LUTTE CONTRE LES AGRESSIONS À CARACTÈRE SEXUEL and VANCOUVER RAPE RELIEF SOCIETY, CHRISTIAN LEGAL FELLOWSHIP, CATHOLIC CIVIL RIGHTS LEAGUE and REAL WOMEN OF CANADA, THE DAVID ASPER CENTRE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, THE INSTITUT SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR, THE AWCEP ASIAN WOMEN FOR EQUALITY SOCIETY, OPERATING AS ASIAN WOMEN COALITION ENDING PROSTITUTION and THE ABORIGINAL LEGAL SERVICES OF TORONTO INC. Interveners ______________________________________________________________________________ FACTUM OF THE INTERVENERS, CHRISTIAN LEGAL FELLOWSHIP, CATHOLIC CIVIL RIGHTS LEAGUE and REAL WOMEN OF CANADA ______________________________________________________________________________ BENNETT JONES LLP BENNETT JONES LLP 3400 One First Canadian Place World Exchange Plaza P.O. Box 130 1900 – 45 O’Connor Street Toronto, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario M4X 1A4 K1P 1A4 Robert W. Staley Sheridan Scott Ranjan K. Agarwal Amanda McLachlan Telephone: (416) 863-1200 Telephone: (613) 683-2300 Facsimile: (416) 863-1216 Facsimile: (613) 683-2323 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the interveners Agent to the interveners ORIGINAL TO: THE REGISTRAR Supreme Court of Canada COPIES TO: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Ontario Regional Office Bank of Canada Building - East Tower The Exchange Tower 234 Wellington Street, Room 1212 130 King Street West Ottawa, Ontario Suite 3400 K1A 0H8 Toronto, Ontario M5X 1K6 Michael H. Morris Christopher M. Rupar Telephone: (416) 973-9704 Telephone: (613) 941-2351 Facsimile: (416) 952-4518 Facsimile: (416) 952-4518 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Appellant/Respondent on Agents for the Appellant/Respondent on Cross-Appeal, Attorney General of Canada Cross-Appeal, Attorney General of Canada MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY BURKE-ROBERTSON GENERAL 10th Floor 441 MacLaren Street 720 Bay Street Suite 200 Toronto, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario M5G 2K1 K2P 2H3 Jamie Klukach Robert E. Houston, Q.C. Christine E. Bartlett-Hughes Megan Stephens Telephone: (416) 326-4639 Telephone: (613) 236-9665 Facsimile: (416) 326-4656 Facsimile: (613) 235-4430 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Appellant/Respondent on Agents for the Appellant/Respondent on Cross-Appeal, Attorney General of Ontario Cross-Appeal, Attorney General of Ontario ALAN N. YOUNG SACK GOLDBLATT MITCHELL LLP Barrister & Solicitor 500 - 30 Metcalfe Street Osgoode Hall Law School Ottawa, Ontario 4700 Keele Street, Room 428 K1P 5L4 Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3 Fiona Campbell Telephone: (416) 736-5595 Telephone: (613) 235-5327 Ext: 2451 Facsimile: (416) 736-5736 Facsimile: (613) 235-3041 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Respondent/Appellant on Agents for the Respondent/Appellant on Cross-Appeal, Terri Jean Bedford Cross-Appeal, Terri Jean Bedford MARZEL LAW SACK GOLDBLATT MITCHELL LLP 265 Rimrock Road, Suite 200 500 - 30 Metcalfe Street Toronto, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario M3J 3C6 K1P 5L4 Yaron Marzel Fiona Campbell Stacey Nichols Telephone: (416) 485-5800 Telephone: (613) 235-5327 Ext: 2451 Facsimile: (416) 485-1610 Facsimile: (613) 235-3041 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Respondent/Appellant on Agents for the Respondent/Appellant on Cross-Appeal, Amy Lebovitvh Cross-Appeal, Amy Lebovitvh SACK GOLDBLATT MITCHELL LLP SACK GOLDBLATT MITCHELL LLP 1100- 20 Dundas St. W. 500 - 30 Metcalfe Street Toronto, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario M5G 2G8 K1P 5L4 Marlys Edwardh Fiona Campbell Daniel Sheppard Telephone: (416) 979-4380 Telephone: (613) 235-5327 Ext: 2451 Facsimile: (416) 979-4430 Facsimile: (613) 235-3041 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Respondent/Appellant on Agents for the Respondent/Appellant on Cross-Appeal, Valerie Scott Cross-Appeal, Valerie Scott PROCUREUR GÉNÉRAL DU QUÉBEC NOËL & ASSOCIÉS 1200, Route de l'Église, 2ème étage 111, rue Champlain Québec, Quebec Gatineau, Quebec G1V 4M1 J8X 3R1 Sylvain Leboeuf Pierre Landry Julie Dassylva Telephone: (418) 643-1477 Ext: 21010 Telephone: (819) 771-7393 Facsimile: (418) 644-7030 Facsimile: (819) 771-5397 E-mail: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Intervener, Attorney General Agents for the Intervener, Attorney General of Quebec of Quebec PIVOT LEGAL LLP MCMILLAN LLP 121 Heatley Avenue 50 O'Connor Street Vancouver, BC V6A 3E9 Suite 300 Ottawa, ON K1P 6L2 Katrina Pacey Jeffrey Beedell Anne Glaude Jonathan O'Hara Telephone: (604) 255-9700 Ext: 103 Telephone: (613) 232-7171 Ext: 122 Facsimile: (604) 255-1552 Facsimile: (613) 231-3191 E-mail: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: Jonathan.O'[email protected] Lawyers for the Interveners, Pivot Legal Agents for the Interveners, Pivot Legal Society, Downtown Eastside Sex Workers Society, Downtown Eastside Sex Workers United Against Violence and PACE Society United Against Violence and PACE Society MCCARTHY TETRAULT LLP OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP Pacific Centre 340 Albert Street P.O. Box 10424 Suite 1300 Suite 1900 777 Dunsmuir Street Ottawa, Ontario Vancouver, BC V7Y 1K2 K1R 7Y6 Michael Feder Patricia J. Wilson Tammy Shoranick Telephone: (604) 643-5986 Telephone: (613) 787-1009 Facsimile: (604) 622-5614 Facsimile: (613) 235-2867 Email: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Lawyers for the Intervener, Secretariat of Agents for the Intervener, Secretariat of the Joint United Nations Programme on the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS HIV/AIDS HUNTER LITIGATION CHAMBERS MICHAEL J. SOBKIN Suite 2100 – 1040 West Georgia Street 90 blvd. de Lucerne Vancouver, British Columbia Unit #2 V6E 4H1 Gatineau, QC J9H 7K8 Brent Olthuis Megan Vis-Dunbar Telephone: (604) 891-2400 Telephone: (819) 778-7794 Facsimile: (604) 647-4554 Facsimile: (819) 778-1740 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Lawyers for the Intervener, British Columbia Agent for the Intervener, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association Civil Liberties Association EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP OF SUPREME ADVOCACY LLP CANADA 130 Albert Street 397 Gladstone Avenue Suite 1810 Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1P 5G4 Ottawa, ON K2P 0Y9 Georgialee A. Lang Marie-France Major Donald Hutchison Eugene Meehan, Q.C. Telephone: (613) 233-9868 Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 101 Facsimile: (613) 233-0301 Facsimile: (613) 695-8580 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Lawyers for the Intervener, Evangelical Agents for the Intervener, Evangelical Fellowship of Canada Fellowship of Canada COOPER & SANDLER SUPREME ADVOCACY LLP 1900-439 University Avenue 397 Gladstone Avenue Toronto, ON M5G 1Y8 Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K2P 0Y9 Jonathan A. Shime Marie-France Major Megan Schwartzentruber Telephone: (416) 585-9191 Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Facsimile: (416) 408-2372 Facsimile: (613) 695-8580 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Lawyers for the Interveners, Canadian Agents for the Interveners, Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, British Columbia HIV/AIDS Legal Network, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS and HIV Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS and HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario FARADAY LAW BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
Recommended publications
  • Selling Ourselves: Prostitution in Canada
    The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada Centre for Faith and Public Life [email protected] www.theEFC.ca THE EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA is the national association of evangelical Christians, gathered together for influence, impact and identity in ministry and public witness. SELLING OURSELVES: PROSTITUTION IN CANADA- WHERE ARE WE HEADED? A Comparison of the Swedish and the Dutch Models, and the Correlation Between Prostitution and Human Trafficking ORIGINALLY RELEASED APRIL 2010 EFC – CENTRE FOR FAITH AND PUBLIC LIFE 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary _______________________________________________3 1. Introduction ____________________________________________________5 2. Canada’s Current Stance on Prostitution ____________________________6 THE EVANGELICAL Prostitution and the Criminal Code __________________________________7 FELLOWSHIP OF Legalization vs. Decriminalization ___________________________________7 CANADA Abolition ______________________________________________________7 is the national association Prostitution in Canada: Where do we stand? __________________________7 of evangelical Terri Jean Bedford et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen ______________________8 Christians, Downtown East Side Sex Workers United Against Violence Society v. Her gathered together Majesty the Queen ________________________________________8 for influence, 3. Criminalizing Demand: The Case in Sweden _________________________9 impact and identity in ministry The Law on the Prohibition of Purchase of Sexual Services ______________9 and public witness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Desired Object : Prostitution in Canda, United States and Australia
    The Desired Object: Prostitution in Canada, United States and Australia THE DESIRED OBJECT: PROSTITUTION IN CANADA, UNITED STATES AND AUSTRALIA Suzanne E. Hatty Senior Lecturer and Coordinator Criminology School of Social Science and Liberal Studies Charles Sturt University New South Wales THE STATE REGULATION OF SEXUALITY CONTINUES TO GENERATE CONTRO-versy amongst feminist scholars and activists, criminologists and law-makers. Historically, the state has upheld traditional patriarchal institutions and supported male-biased rights concerning the deployment of sexuality and reproductive abilities. The state has actively sought to entrench women's position as home- maker and sexually-available partner, whilst at the same time contesting the right of women to practise prostitution. In a gender-stratified society, in which sex, sexuality and the body are socially- constructed, prostitution raises important questions about the nature of desire, pleasure, harm and violence. As Lowman (1986, p. 193) notes: For contemporary feminists, the sexual commodification of women creates an uneasy tension between a desire to suppress the trade and a desire to free prostitutes from state interference. On the one hand, prostitution represents the pole of a system of sexual stratification and must be resisted as the quintessential form of men's exploitation of women (and children of both sexes). Prostitution is the raw end [sic] of patriarchy. In this paper, the different ways in which prostitution by women is conceptualised by prostitute advocacy groups and academics in the United States and Australia will be examined. Current research on the experience of prostitution will be reviewed, with particular emphasis on information gathered during interviews with prostitute women in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminalisation of Sex Work: a Human Rights Crisis in Canada and Beyond
    Criminalisation of sex work: A human rights crisis in Canada and beyond Glenn Betteridge Joanne Csete 1 Overview Human rights questions raised by legal approaches to sex work Human rights analysis of Canadian law related to sex work Recommendations for human rights-based approaches What can we do? 2 Legal approaches to regulation of sex work (1) Abolition Assumes all sex work is abusive, victimizing, enslaving; seeks eradication; repudiates person agency of sex workers Reflected in UN 1949 Trafficking Convention: all sex work should end and sex workers should be “saved” (Canada is not a party) Reflected in US policy: confounding of trafficking and sex work Rarely basis of national law per se 3 Legal approaches to regulation of sex work (2) Criminalisation: 3 approaches Act of prostitution illegal (China, Islamic republics, So Africa) Act of prostitution not illegal, but acts associated with it are, e.g. ¾ soliciting, procuring ¾ brothel-keeping, abetting brothel-keeping ¾ living off sex work earnings ¾ vagrancy, loitering, public nuisance, etc. (approach of Canada, India, UK, ex-USSR, many others – reflects in perverse way abolitionist idea of sex worker as victim) Criminalisation of buying but not selling sex (Sweden) 4 Legal approaches to regulation of sex work (3) Decriminalisation (New Zealand, Australia): also limited decriminalisation in ‘zones of tolerance,’ other circumstances Legalisation with regulation (Netherlands, Nevada in US): extensive health and other regulations and conditions of licensing may be abusive 5 Effect of criminalisation (greater detail later on Canada case) Greater stigma, marginalization, driving underground, opportunity for organised crime Greater risk of abuse by clients: less time to check out prospective clients Greater risk of abuse by police (widespread “subbotnik”) Unlikelihood of police protection for sex workers or prosecution of abusers of sex workers Inhibition of sex workers’ right to organise.
    [Show full text]
  • Street Prostitution in Canada
    Statistics Canada – Catalogue no. 85-002-XPE Vol. 17 no. 2 STREET PROSTITUTION IN CANADA by Doreen Duchesne Highlights n In 1995, almost all of the 7,165 prostitution incidents reported by police nationally involved communicating to buy or sell the services of a prostitute (92%). The remaining incidents concerned procuring (5%) or bawdy-house (3%) offences. n Annual fluctuations in the number of reported prostitution incidents within jurisdictions are common and usually reflect changes in the enforcement of the communicating law, rather than the volume of criminal activity (Chart A). For example, between 1994 and 1995, the total number of Chart A prostitution incidents in Canada rose 29%, largely due to a substantial rise in communicating offences in Van- Communicating incidents in Canada couver. But this increase followed two years of steep declines, mainly traced to Toronto, Edmonton and Cal- gary (in 1994), and Vancouver (in 1993). Thousands 12 12 n The vast majority of persons accused of a prostitution- related offence in 1995 were adults aged 18 or older 10 10 (97%). The relatively small proportion of youths (12 to 17 year-olds) charged may reflect their frequent diversion 8 to social service agencies by police. 8 n Since December 1985, when the communicating law 6 6 replaced the soliciting law, there has been a shift towards more males being charged. Between 1986 and 1995, 4 4 almost half (47%) of all persons charged with communicating were male, compared with just over one- 2 2 third (36%) of those charged with soliciting in the 1977 to 1985 period.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Foreign Aid and the Christian Right
    CANADIAN FOREIGN AID AND THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT: STEPHEN HARPER, ABORTION, AND THE GLOBAL CULTURE WARS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA, 2006–2015 Erin Jex A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in fulfillment of the requirements for the M.A. in Political Science with a specialization in Women’s Studies Faculty of Social Sciences School of Political Studies University of Ottawa © Erin Jex, Ottawa, Canada, 2017 ii Abstract This thesis expands upon the concept of the global culture wars in sub-Saharan Africa from a Canadian perspective, focusing on the growing division within Canada between conservative, religious values and liberal, progressive ones (Caplan, 2012). This division led to a political and cultural realignment alongside the increased visibility and leadership of religious and faith communities in Canadian public and political life. Amidst this polarization, Conservative Party leader Stephen Harper was elected Prime Minister in February 2006. Under his leadership, a conservative, pro-family agenda was established. This agenda, which advocates a traditional understanding of family life and structure, in particular refers to a legally married, heterosexual couple with children. It was supported by the evangelical Christian population in Canada, which grew from a united religious community in Canada into a significant constituency of the Conservative Party. Harper’s tenure, coupled with the increased visibility and leadership of faith and religious communities significantly affected domestic and international policies during his tenure as Prime Minister, from 2006 to 2015. This thesis examines the Muskoka Initiative on Maternal, Child, and Newborn Health (Muskoka-MNCH) and shows how this initiative, which fostered anti-abortion rhetoric abroad, was utilized to appease the evangelical community’s anti- abortion position in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Trafficking in the Canadian Context: Exploring the Political Landscape, Examining Discourse, and Identifying Health Issues Among Women with Lived Experience
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 11-8-2012 12:00 AM Sexual Trafficking in the Canadian Context: Exploring theolitical P Landscape, Examining Discourse, and Identifying Health Issues among Women with Lived Experience Hoda Malakouti-Nejad The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr Treena Orchard The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Health and Rehabilitation Sciences A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Science © Hoda Malakouti-Nejad 2012 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Malakouti-Nejad, Hoda, "Sexual Trafficking in the Canadian Context: Exploring theolitical P Landscape, Examining Discourse, and Identifying Health Issues among Women with Lived Experience" (2012). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 960. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/960 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SEXUAL TRAFFICKING IN THE CANADIAN CONTEXT: EXPLORING THE POLITICAL LANDSCAPE, EXAMINING DISCOURSE, AND IDENTIFYING HEALTH ISSUES AMONG WOMEN WITH LIVED EXPERIENCE (Spine title: Sexual Trafficking) (Thesis format: Monograph) by Hoda Malakouti-Nejad Graduate Program in Health and Rehabilitation Sciences A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Hoda Malakouti-Nejad 2012 THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies CERTIFICATE OF EXAMINATION Supervisor Examiners ______________________________ ______________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Rights to Supervised Drug Injection Facilities in Canada Peter Bowal*, Kelsey Horvat
    OPEN ACCESS Review Constitutional rights to supervised drug injection facilities in Canada Peter Bowal*, Kelsey Horvat Haskayne School of Business, University ABSTRACT of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, NW, On September 30, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada ordered the government of Canada to continue Calgary, AB, Canada, T2N 1N4 * Email: [email protected] to exempt Vancouver’s supervised narcotic injection facility from Canada’s criminal drug laws. The controversial clinic, known as Insite, had operated for eight years in one of the country’s most socially troubled and economically challenged neighbourhoods struggling with addictions to illegal drugs. Insite was the first of its kind in North America, although supervised drug injection facilities continue in Europe and Australia. In this article we describe what the court accepted as the factual outcomes of this clinic and the constitutional basis for this judicial rejection of government health and criminal policy. We also consider the implications of this decision for similar facilities across Canada. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5339/irl.2013.3 Submitted: 30 August 2012 Accepted: 18 November 2012 ª 2013 Bowal & Horvat, licensee Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 3.0 which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Cite this article as: Bowal P, Horvat K. Constitutional rights to supervised drug injection facilities in Canada, International Review of Law 2013:3 http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/irl.2013.3 Page 2 of 7 Bowal & Horvat.
    [Show full text]
  • Click Here to Download the PDF File
    There Is No Sex in the Champagne Room(?): Critically Reconsidering Canada's De Facto Prostitution Prohibition after R. v. Labaye by Andrij Y. Harapa, B.A. (Hons.) A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Legal Studies Department of Law Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario June 10th, 2008 © 2008, Andrij Y. Harapa Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-43461-1 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-43461-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • R. V. Labaye, [2005] 3 S.C.R
    SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: R. v. Labaye, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 728, 2005 SCC 80 DATE: 20051221 DOCKET: 30460 BETWEEN: Jean-Paul Labaye Appellant and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent OFFICIAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION: Reasons of Bastarache and LeBel JJ. CORAM: McLachlin C.J. and Major, Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella and Charron JJ. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: McLachlin C.J. (Major, Binnie, Deschamps, Fish, Abella (paras. 1 to 72) and Charron JJ. concurring) DISSENTING REASONS: Bastarache and LeBel JJ. (paras. 73 to 154) ______________________________ R. v. Labaye, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 728, 2005 SCC 80 Jean-Paul Labaye Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Indexed as: R. v. Labaye Neutral citation: 2005 SCC 80. File No.: 30460. 2005: April 18; 2005: December 21. Present: McLachlin C.J. and Major, Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella and Charron JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for quebec Criminal law — Keeping common bawdy-house — Indecency — Harm-based test — Group sex in club — Whether conduct constitutes criminal indecency — Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, ss. 197(1) “common bawdy-house”, 210(1). The accused was charged with keeping a common bawdy-house for the practice of acts of indecency under s. 210(1) of the Criminal Code. The accused - 3 - operated a club in Montréal the purpose of which was to permit couples and single people to meet each other for group sex. Only members and their guests were admitted to the club. Prospective members were interviewed to ensure that they were aware of the nature of the activities of the club.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Neo-Conservative Discourse: a Critical Discourse Analyse
    CANADIAN NEO-CONSERVATIVE DISCOURSE: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSE DONNA L. LILLIAN A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfilrnent of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Programme in English York University Toronto, Ontario September 200 1 National Library Bibliothèque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Weflington Ottawa ON KIA ON4 OttawaON KlAW Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Libmy of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or seU reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur fomat électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. .- Canadian Neo-Conservative Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis by DONNA L. LILLIAN a thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of York University in partial fuifiIlment of the requirernents for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Q 2001 Permission has been granted to the UBRARY OF YORK UNIVERSITY to tend or sel! copies of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of CANADA BETWEEN: Attorney General of Canada and Minister of Health for Canada Appellants / Respondents on Cross
    SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Canada (Attorney General) v. PHS Community ServicesSociety, 2011 DATE: 20110930 SCC 44, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 134 DOCKET: 33556 BETWEEN: Attorney General of Canada and Minister of Health for Canada Appellants / Respondents on cross-appeal and PHS Community Services Society, Dean Edward Wilson, Shelly Tomic and Attorney General of British Columbia Respondents Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU) Respondent / Appellant on cross-appeal - and - Attorney General of Quebec, Dr. Peter AIDS Foundation, Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, International Harm Reduction Association, CACTUS Montréal, Canadian Nurses Association, Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario, Association of Registered Nurses of British Columbia, Canadian Public Health Association, Canadian Medical Association, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, British Columbia Nurses’ Union and REAL Women of Canada Interveners CORAM: McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: McLachlin C.J. (Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, (paras. 1 to 159) Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ. concurring) Canada (Attorney General) v. PHS Community Services Society, 2011 SCC 44, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 134 Attorney General of Canada and Minister of Health for Canada Appellants/Respondents on cross-appeal v. PHS Community Services Society, Dean Edward Wilson, Shelly Tomic and Attorney General of British Columbia Respondents
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Obscenity Law 20 Years After R V Butler
    THE CANADIAN BAR REVIEW LA REVUE DU BARREAU CANADIEN Vol. 93 2015 No. 1 THE PAPER TIGRESS: CANADIAN OBSCENITY LAW 20 YEARS AFTER R V BUTLER Janine Benedet * The Supreme Court of Canada’s 1992 decision in R v Butler was viewed by its supporters and its critics as having important and far-reaching consequences. In fact, a survey of the available obscenity cases prosecuted after Butler demonstrates that the offence is rarely used to target sexist and sexually violent pornography, with only one reported conviction in the past fifteen years. There are a number of possible reasons for this outcome, including the normalization and pervasiveness of sexual violence against women and an undue narrowing of the harms identified in Butler. This article examines the limited use of the obscenity offence from 1992-2012 and calls for a renewed consideration of how to address the harms of pornography consistent with a commitment to sex equality. Tant les partisans que les opposants de la décision rendue par la Cour suprême du Canada en 1992 dans l’arrêt R c Butler, étaient d’accord pour dire que ce jugement aurait des conséquences importantes et une portée considérable. En réalité, une étude des causes portant sur l’obscénité, qui ont été instruites à la suite de l’affaire Butler, démontre qu’on fait rarement appel à l’infraction connexe pour cibler la pornographie caractérisée par le sexisme et la violence sexuelle. De fait, au cours des quinze dernières années, une seule déclaration de culpabilité a ainsi été rapportée. De nombreuses raisons expliquent ce * Associate Dean, Academic Affairs, Peter A Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia.
    [Show full text]