Helsinki-Tallinn Transport Link Feasibility Study – Final Report Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Helsinki-Tallinn Transport Link Feasibility Study – Final Report Table of Contents Helsinki-Tallinn Transport Link Feasibility Study – Final report Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................6 1.1. Technical concept .........................................................................................................................6 1.2. Cost estimation ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.3. Estimation of demand ................................................................................................................. 7 1.4. Cost-benefit analysis ..................................................................................................................8 1.5. Economic Impacts of FinEst Link ................................................................................................8 1.6. Wider economic impacts .............................................................................................................9 1.7. Planning objectives ......................................................................................................................9 1.8. Strategic positioning ..................................................................................................................10 2. Introduction ...........................................................................................................12 3. Ferry Traffic Solution 0+ ...................................................................................... 14 3.1. Past Development .......................................................................................................................14 3.2. Recent Traffic Patterns ..............................................................................................................14 3.2.1. Vessel Traffic ...................................................................................................................14 3.3. Other Routes between Finland and Estonia ............................................................................15 3.4. 0+ Option ....................................................................................................................................15 3.4.1. General ...........................................................................................................................15 3.4.2. Traffic Investments in Ports ..........................................................................................16 3.4.3. 0+ Current Facilities ......................................................................................................16 3.4.4. 0+ Cargo to Vuosaari and Muuga ...............................................................................17 3.4.5. 0+ All Ferry Traffic to Vuosaari and Muuga ................................................................17 3.4.6. 0+ Other Ports ...............................................................................................................18 3.4.7. 0+ Modern Technologies ..............................................................................................18 3.5. 0+ Summary and Conclusions ..................................................................................................18 4. Geology ..................................................................................................................19 4.1. Readings ..................................................................................................................................... 22 5. Fixed Link Tunnel Solution .................................................................................... 23 5.1. Tunnel Concept........................................................................................................................... 23 5.2. Alignment Study ........................................................................................................................ 27 5.3. Maintenance and operation .....................................................................................................31 6. Tunnel safety management .................................................................................. 33 7. Train operation concept ........................................................................................35 7.1. Volume Estimations ....................................................................................................................35 7.1.1. Passenger Volume Estimations ......................................................................................35 7.2. Passenger train traffic ..............................................................................................................40 7.3. Car & truck shuttles and conventional freight trains ...............................................................41 7.4. Terminals and depots ...............................................................................................................43 8. Strategic Environmental Assessment ..................................................................44 9. Economic and Financial Feasibility Study ............................................................47 9.1. Infrastructure investment cost estimation ...............................................................................47 9.2. Operation and maintenance cost ............................................................................................48 10. Cost – benefit analysis .......................................................................................49 10.1. Investment and Maintenance .................................................................................................49 10.2. Consumer Surplus, Passenger Transport ..............................................................................50 10.3. Producers Surplus, Passenger Transport ...............................................................................51 10.4. Cargo Transport .......................................................................................................................51 10.5. Externalities..............................................................................................................................52 10.6. Sensitivity Analysis ...................................................................................................................53 11. Wider Impact Analysis .........................................................................................55 11.1. Framework and Methods .........................................................................................................55 11.2. Assumptions of Economic and Demographic Developments .............................................57 11.3. Agglomeration Impacts ...........................................................................................................58 11.4. Competition Impacts ................................................................................................................62 11.5. Summary of Wider Impact Analysis .......................................................................................63 11.6. Sensitivity Analysis ....................................................................................................................64 11.7. Economic Land Use Impacts ....................................................................................................64 11.8. Effects of Construction on Employment .................................................................................65 11.9. Visions on the Cross-Border Integration and Structural Changes .....................................66 12. Risk Management ................................................................................................68 13. Benchmarking .....................................................................................................70 13.1. Technical benchmarking ..........................................................................................................70 13.2. Economical benchmarking ..................................................................................................... 73 13.3. Benchmarking conclusions and issues to consider ..............................................................75 14. New technologies ................................................................................................76 14.1. General ......................................................................................................................................76 14.2. Evaluation of the proposals ....................................................................................................78 14.3. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................82 15. Financing model evaluation ................................................................................83 15.1. Alternative Project Contract And Ainancing Models .............................................................83 15.2. Alternative Risk Allocation Models .........................................................................................85 15.3. Issues To Consider Regarding Financial Structure ..............................................................86 16. Financial modelling .............................................................................................88 16.1. Financial modelling assumptions ............................................................................................88
Recommended publications
  • Porslahdentie Rastböle
    Rastila (M) - Vuosaari (M) - 11.8.2014-14.6.2015 96 Porslahdentie Rastböle (M) - Nordsjö (M) - Porslaxvägen Rastila (M) Porslahdentie Rastböle (M) Porslaxvägen Ma-pe / Må-fr Ma-pe / Må-fr Rastila(M) Vuosaari(M), lait.11 Porslahdentie Vuosaari(M), lait.14 Rastböle(M) > Nordsjö(M), pf.11 Porslaxvägen > Nordsjö(M), pf.14 5.11 5.21 5.14 5.23 5.27 5.37 5.29 5.38 5.43 5.53 5.45 5.54 5.59 6.09 6.01 6.10 6.15 6.25 6.09 6.17 6.23 6.33 6.17 6.25 6.31 6.41 6.25 6.33 6.39 6.49 6.33 6.41 6.47 6.57 6.41 6.49 6.55 7.05 6.49 6.57 7.03 7.13 6.57 7.05 7.11 7.21 7.05 7.13 7.19 7.29 7.13 7.21 7.27 7.37 7.21 7.29 7.35 7.45 7.29 7.37 7.43 7.53 7.37 7.45 80-98A 7.51 8.01 7.45 7.53 80-98A 7.59 8.09 7.53 8.01 8.07 8.17 8.01 8.09 8.15 8.25 8.09 8.17 8.23 8.33 8.17 8.25 8.31 8.41 8.25 8.33 8.39 8.49 8.33 8.41 8.47 8.57 8.41 8.49 8.55 9.05 8.49 8.57 9.03 9.13 8.59 9.09 9.11 9.21 9.09 9.17 9.19 9.29 9.19 9.27 9.35 9.47 9.29 9.37 9.51 10.03 9.39 9.47 9.59 10.11 9.59 10.07 10.16 10.28 10.19 10.27 10.36 10.48 10.39 10.47 10.56 11.08 10.59 11.07 11.16 11.28 11.19 11.27 11.36 11.48 11.39 11.47 11.56 12.08 11.59 12.07 12.16 12.28 12.19 12.27 12.36 12.48 12.39 12.47 12.56 13.08 12.59 13.07 13.16 13.28 13.19 13.27 13.36 13.48 13.39 13.47 13.56 14.08 13.59 14.07 351 96 11.8.2014-14.6.2015 Rastila (M) Porslahdentie Rastböle (M) Porslaxvägen Ma-pe / Må-fr Ma-pe / Må-fr Rastila(M) Vuosaari(M), lait.11 Porslahdentie Vuosaari(M), lait.14 Rastböle(M) > Nordsjö(M), pf.11 Porslaxvägen > Nordsjö(M), pf.14 14.16 14.28 14.19 14.26 14.36 14.46 14.38 14.46 14.44 14.54 14.54 15.02 14.52
    [Show full text]
  • FINEST BAY AREA DEVELOPMENT OY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Finest Bay Area - Railway Tunnel Between Finland and Estonia
    FINEST BAY AREA DEVELOPMENT OY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Finest Bay Area - Railway tunnel between Finland and Estonia The world’s longest railway tunnel project that uses private funding Finest Bay Area - Railway tunnel between Finland and Estonia The goal of the project is to construct an undersea railway tunnel between Finland and Estonia that serves both passenger and freight traffic and significantly reduces travel time between the countries. The travel time target between Helsinki Airport and Ülemiste airport in Estonia is approximately 20 minutes. The planned railway tunnel merges the Helsinki region and Tallinn into a single metropolis. The tunnel will connect Asia and Europe into a single hub for business, travel and traffic, since the tunnel project makes it possible to travel to Tallinn by train directly from Helsinki Airport. On the Estonian side, the possible connection with the Rail Baltica project will connect the region even more closely to Central Europe. Facts about the project • Tunnel length approx. 100 km. • The total cost of the project is estimated at EUR 15 billion. • The project is based on private funds. Control over the project company will remain in Finland, with project financing provided by international investors from all over the world. Equity will amount to 30% of the financing and 70% will be covered by debt. • At the moment, a one-way ticket costs 50 euros, a return ticket 100 euros and a yearly ticket 1,000 euros. Tickets are available from an online store: https://shop.finestbayarea.online/ • The project involves planning an artificial island which, according to the larger option, would enable real estate development on the island.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of the Republic of Finland for the Relocation of the European Medicines Agency to Helsinki TABLE of CONTENTS
    Application of the Republic of Finland for the relocation of the European Medicines Agency to Helsinki TABLE OF CONTENTS In safe hands 3 A SMOOTH TRANSITION 5 The new location of the European Medicines Agency 7 Continuity and a smooth handover 10 LIFE IN HELSINKI 13 Livable Helsinki 15 Easily accessible 17 Superb and internationally acclaimed education 21 Employment, social security and healthcare 26 A NEW CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN HEALTH 28 A strategic decision – EMA alongside ECHA 30 Helsinki – a hub for the life sciences 32 emahelsinki.fi 2 — Helsinki for EMA In safe hands The most crucial criterion for transferring the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to its new location is the ability to affect a smooth transition. To get the job done. Placing EMA alongside the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in Helsinki enhances the EU’s global regulatory competitiveness. Finland, simply stated, is known synergies to create a centre of Finland and the Helsinki region for its capacity to get the job excellence for the protection of possess top class expertise in the done. As a committed EU member human health. life sciences in terms of a high- and in our many roles on the glob- quality talent pool, world-leading al stage – from diplomatic conflict This decision is not a simple research, strong support servic- resolution initiatives to UN Peace- question of competition within es, and functioning networks of keeping missions – we are viewed the EU or among potential host collaboration among academia, as a partner to be entrusted with states. This is a global compe- industry and the public sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Vuoli Tunnels Finland
    PROJECT SHEET Vuoli Tunnels Finland Construction SKANSKA TEKRA OY/ SKANSKA BS/SIEMENS FINLAND/FINNISH ROAD ENTERPRISE Consulting Engineer KALLIOSUUNNUITTELY ROCPLAN OY LTD. Owner VUOSAARI HARBOUR COMPANY & FINNISH ROAD ADMINISTRATION Products ADMIX C-1000 NF Project Type HARBOR TUNNELS Xypex Admix C-1000 NF played critical role in shotcrete waterproofing of Vuosaari Harbor tunnels. When city planners and engineers began The exposed rock interiors of the road and rail drawing up designs for a new harbor that tunnels were reinforced with deep anchor could relieve the pressure on the Port of Hel- bolts and coated with a base layer of standard sinki, the need for easy access via roads and shotcrete to a thickness of 60 - 80 mm. On rails was a critical requirement. The new USD top of this base layer, a 40 - 60 mm layer of $757 million Vuosaari Harbor, located about shotcrete mixed with Xypex Admix C-1000 NF 15 km northeast of central Helsinki, was built crystalline waterproofing was applied to pro- on 150 hectares (370 acres), which includes vide a permanent seal against moisture intru- 90 hectares that had to be filled in. sion. Finally, a 25 mm layer of standard shot- crete was applied to the innermost surface. The critical port of Helsinki, Finland, could no The new harbor, completed in 2009, can han- longer handle all of the trade that was flowing in dle more than 12 million tons of unitized cargo More than 28,000 kg (61,700 lb) of Xypex Ad- and out of its docks. The decision was made to (e.g., containers, trucks, trailers, etc.) annu- mix was needed to treat the waterproofing build a new, larger port 15 km east of the city in ally.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Baltic Ports Together: Forecasts, Trends and Recommendations
    TURUN YLIOPISTON MERENKULKUALAN KOULUTUS- JA TUTKIMUSKESKUKSEN JULKAISUJA PUBLICATIONS OF THE CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF TURKU A 68 2013 FIVE BALTIC PORTS TOGETHER: FORECASTS, TRENDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Holma Elisa Hunt Tõnis Lappalainen Anssi Mustonen Maria Nõmmela Kaidi Portsmuth Raivo Yliskylä-Peuralahti Johanna TURUN YLIOPISTON MERENKULKUALAN KOULUTUS- JA TUTKIMUSKESKUKSEN JULKAISUJA PUBLIKATIONER AV SJÖFARTSBRANSCHENS UTBILDNINGS- OCH FORSKNINGSCENTRAL VID ÅBO UNIVERSITET PUBLICATIONS OF THE CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF TURKU A 68 2013 FIVE BALTIC PORTS TOGETHER: FORECASTS, TRENDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Holma Elisa Hunt Tõnis Lappalainen Anssi Mustonen Maria Nõmmela Kaidi Portsmuth Raivo Yliskylä-Peuralahti Johanna Turku 2013 JULKAISIJA / PUBLISHER: Turun yliopisto / University of Turku MERENKULKUALAN KOULUTUS- JA TUTKIMUSKESKUS CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES Käyntiosoite / Visiting address: ICT-talo, Joukahaisenkatu 3-5 B, 4.krs, Turku Postiosoite / Postal address: FI-20014 TURUN YLIOPISTO Puh. / Tel. +358 (0)2 333 51 http://mkk.utu.fi Painosalama Oy Turku 2013 ISBN 978-951-29-5487-2 (printed) ISBN 978-951-29-5488-2 (pdf) ISSN 1456-1816 FOREWORD Ports that operate as gateways have always been sensitive to changes in socio-economic trends. Ports enable the carriage of goods by sea, thus they are subject changes triggered by many factors: changes in the socio-economic structures of the regions they serve, changes in legislation, changes due to environmental issues and so on. Adapting to changes requires a proactive and collaborative attitude from the whole port community. Ports need to be aware of the factors that cause change but they can also affect their own future by creating demand, establishing new relations and by attracting shipowners.
    [Show full text]
  • Finest Link New Technologies Challenge
    FinEst Link New Technologies Challenge Antero Alku, Esa Nurkka Alkutieto Oy, 8.1.2018, päivitetty versio Table of contents 1. Executive summary 2. Goal 3. Service concept of the tunnel • Traffic system level • Service level 4. Variations of a TSI compatible tunnel • Car transport in large profile rolling stock • Dual gauge track 5. Service concepts of trains • Commuter trains • Road vehicle trains • Long distance passenger trains • Night trains to Rail Baltica • Freight trains 6. Traffic economy • Basics of public transport economy • Train operating costs • Tunnel maintenance and operation • Incomes • Operational result 7. Tunnel economy • Return of investment • Development of ROI • ROI and the size of investment 8. Tunnel concept • Basic situation • Helsinki end transfer • Tallinn end transfer • Road vehicle train terminals • Freight transfer terminals • Tunnel track gauge • Tunnel concept investment 9. Tunnel concept • Car transport in large profile rolling stock • Double track gauge 10. Regional impacts • Channel tunnel – a bad proxy for Helsinki-Tallinn tunnel • Øresund Bridge – a better proxy for Helsinki-Tallinn tunnel • Conclusion on the regional impacts 11. Conclusion 2 Executive summary The key findings in this report: ● The justification for the construction of the tunnel is based on the daily commuting between Helsinki area and Tallinn area. The business potential of long term passenger transportation as well as freight transportation is of minor significance, and the business case is viable based solely on commuting traffic. ● The utilization of the artificial islands has not been discussed in this report, but the potential should not be underestimated. ● A 1435/1524 mm dual gauge track is the recommended solution, with 1435 mm tracks dedicated for Rail Baltica passenger trains ending underneath the Helsinki railway station.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Slightly Slummier Area? Negotiations of Place-Bound
    A slightly slummier area? Negotiations of place-bound identities through social spatialisations and unofficial toponyms1 Jani Vuolteenaho, Hanna Lappalainen & Terhi Ainiala University of Helsinki ABSTRACT: In the article, spatialisations (discourses of ideal or stereotyped spaces) are conceptualised as powerful discourses of the surrounding society, providing resources for place-bound identity construction in interaction. We combine a sociolinguistic analysis with Bakhtinian dialogism to understand how such ‘third’ voices in dialogue empower and pluralise self- and other- positionings embedded in the evocations of unofficial place names. Empirically, the focus is on toponyms that divide the socially mixed Vuosaari suburb in Helsinki into ‘older’ and ‘newer’ territories. The results show that when the stereotypes of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ neighbourhoods or other spatialisations interpenetrate the uses of ‘Old’ and ‘New Vuosaari’, they open room for the (re-)voicing of the meanings of these toponyms for highly differentiated social ends. With the Bakhtinian framework bridging between socio-spatial theory and sociolinguistics, the article develops a spatially sensitised approach to analyse the entanglements of the micro-level contexts of interaction with the macro-level discourses of meaning-giving. KEY WORDS: unofficial place names, social spatialisations, self- and other-positioning, place-bound identities 1 ABSTRACT IN FINNISH: Sosiaaliset spatialisaatiot ovat yhteiskunnassa vaikuttavia tilaa koskevia ideologisia diskursseja. Tässä artikkelissa
    [Show full text]
  • FP7-285556 Safecity Project Deliverable D2.5 Helsinki Public Safety Scenario
    FP7‐285556 SafeCity Project Deliverable D2.5 Helsinki Public Safety Scenario Deliverable Type: CO Nature of the Deliverable: R Date: 30.09.2011 Distribution: WP2 Editors: VTT Contributors: VTT, ISDEFE *Deliverable Type: PU= Public, RE= Restricted to a group specified by the Consortium, PP= Restricted to other program participants (including the Commission services), CO= Confidential, only for members of the Consortium (including the Commission services) ** Nature of the Deliverable: P= Prototype, R= Report, S= Specification, T= Tool, O= Other Abstract: This document is an analysis of Helsinki’s public safety characters. It describes the critical infrastructure of Helsinki, discuss its current limitations, and give ideas for the future. D2.5 – HELSINKI PUBLIC SAFETY SCENARIO PROJECT Nº FP7‐ 285556 DISCLAIMER The work associated with this report has been carried out in accordance with the highest technical standards and SafeCity partners have endeavored to achieve the degree of accuracy and reliability appropriate to the work in question. However since the partners have no control over the use to which the information contained within the report is to be put by any other party, any other such party shall be deemed to have satisfied itself as to the suitability and reliability of the information in relation to any particular use, purpose or application. Under no circumstances will any of the partners, their servants, employees or agents accept any liability whatsoever arising out of any error or inaccuracy contained in this report (or any further consolidation, summary, publication or dissemination of the information contained within this report) and/or the connected work and disclaim all liability for any loss, damage, expenses, claims or infringement of third party rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Drivers of Demand in Cargo and Passenger Traffic Between Penta Ports
    TURUN YLIOPISTON MERENKULKUALAN KOULUTUS- JA TUTKIMUSKESKUKSEN JULKAISUJA PUBLICATIONS FROM THE CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF TURKU A 62 2012 DRIVERS OF DEMAND IN CARGO AND PASSENGER TRAFFIC BETWEEN PENTA PORTS Anssi Lappalainen Reima Helminen Johanna Yliskylä-Peuralahti TURUN YLIOPISTON MERENKULKUALAN KOULUTUS- JA TUTKIMUSKESKUKSEN JULKAISUJA PUBLIKATIONER AV SJÖFARTSBRANSCHENS UTBILDNINGS- OCH FORSKNINGSCENTRAL VID ÅBO UNIVERSITET PUBLICATIONS FROM THE CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF TURKU A 62 2012 DRIVERS OF DEMAND IN CARGO AND PASSENGER TRAFFIC BETWEEN PENTA PORTS Lappalainen Anssi Helminen Reima Yliskylä-Peuralahti Johanna Turku 2012 JULKAISIJA / PUBLISHER: Turun yliopisto / University of Turku MERENKULKUALAN KOULUTUS- JA TUTKIMUSKESKUS CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES Käyntiosoite / Visiting address: ICT-talo, Joukahaisenkatu 3-5 B, 4.krs, Turku Postiosoite / Postal address: FI-20014 TURUN YLIOPISTO Puh. / Tel. +358 (0)2 333 51 http://mkk.utu.fi Painosalama Oy Turku 2012 ISBN 978-951-29-5163-5 (printed) ISBN 978-951-29-5164-2 (pdf) ISSN 1456–1816 FOREWORD The Ports of Stockholm, Tallinn, Helsinki, Turku and Naantali play key roles in the accessibility of cargo and passenger traffic to the Central Baltic Region. The role of the ports is crucial for interconnectivity, economic growth and sustainability in the region; they enable both cargo and passenger mobility. This report focuses on the liner traffic between the five so-called PENTA ports: Stockholm, Tallinn, Helsinki Turku and Naantali. The economic situation and foreign trade in each county – Estonia, Finland and Sweden – provides the context for the analysis. The report points out key factors driving the demand for cargo and passenger traffic in each port. The results show that the companies operating the sea routes between these ports have developed different profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Silja Annual Report
    1996 english The Silja Group Silja Oy Ab SALLY UK CRUISE VESSELS GROUP ADMINISTRATION PROFIT CENTERS •Helsinki–Stockholm line •Vaasa traffic •Turku–Stockholm line •Finnjet line •Tallinn line •Silja Cargo SILJA LINE PARTNERS •Marketing•Marine Operation •Service January 1997 The Silja Group’s Parent Company, Carrying nearly 6 million passeng- Silja Oy Ab (formed in 1883), is ers and slightly more than 130,000 listed on the Helsinki Stock cargo units annually, Silja Line is Exchange. the leading passenger ferry company The Group’s core business is pass- in the Baltic Sea. enger ferry operations in the Baltic The Group’s other activities Sea, conducted through Silja Line, include Sally UK’s operations in the which accounts for more than 80 English Channel and three outchar- percent of the Group’s invoicing. tered cruise vessels. Information to Shareholders Contents Annual General Meeting Share register Significant Events during the Year.......2 The Annual General Meeting will For the purpose of registering shares President’s Review...............................4 be held at 2 p.m. on Thursday, or name and address changes, April 17, 1997, in the Conference shareholders are requested to Hall of the Hotel Palace, Eteläranta contact the bank or security regis- Presentation of the Group 10, Helsinki. tration institute managing the Board of Directors, Auditors Shareholders entered in the book-entry account. and Executive Management ................6 records of the Company’s share- holders maintained by the Finnish Financial information Five-year Review.................................8 ■ Central Security Depository Ltd no Silja’s annual report is published Share Capital, Shareholders later than April 7, 1997 are entitled in Finnish, Swedish and English.
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki–Turku-Käytävän Henkilöliikenteen Kehitysnäkymät Toteutuspolut Yhteysvälin Kehittämiseksi
    Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 4/2016 Hanna Kalenoja Samuli Alppi Markus Helelä Elina Väistö Helsinki–Turku-käytävän henkilöliikenteen kehitysnäkymät Toteutuspolut yhteysvälin kehittämiseksi Hyvinkää Paimio Piikkiö Salo Hyvinkää Hyvinkää Paimio Piikkiö Paimio Salo Piikkiö Salo Lohja Lohja Lohja Hista Espoo Hista Espoo Hista Siuntio Espoo Karjaa Masala Karjaa Siuntio Masala Karjaa Siuntio Inkoo Inkoo Masala Kirkkonummi Kirkkonummi Inkoo KirkkonummiTammisaari Tammisaari Tammisaari Hanko Hanko Hanko Helsinki-Turku- moottoritie Helsinki-Turku- uusi ratayhteys moottoritie Helsinki-Turku- uusi ratayhteys moottoritie uusi ratayhteys Hanna Kalenoja, Samuli Alppi, Markus Helelä, Elina Väistö Helsinki–Turku-käytävän henkilöliikenteen kehitysnäkymät Toteutuspolut yhteysvälin kehittämiseksi Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 4/2016 Liikennevirasto Helsinki 2016 Kannen kuva: Sito Oy Verkkojulkaisu pdf (www.liikennevirasto.fi) ISSN-L 1798-6656 ISSN 1798-6664 ISBN 978-952-317-211-1 Liikennevirasto PL 33 00521 HELSINKI Puhelin 0295 34 3000 3 Hanna Kalenoja, Samuli Alppi, Markus Helelä ja Elina Väistö: Helsinki–Turku-käytävän hen- kilöliikenteen kehitysnäkymät. Liikennevirasto, liikenne ja maankäyttö -osasto. Helsinki 2016. Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 4/2016. 80 sivua. ISSN-L 1798-6656, ISSN 1798- 6664, ISBN 978-952-317-211-1. Avainsanat: nopea junayhteys, kehityskäytävä, kaukojunaliikenne, aluerakenne, työssäkäynti- alue Tiivistelmä Työn tavoitteena on ollut kuvata Helsinki–Turku-yhteysvälin henkilöliikenteen nykyti-
    [Show full text]
  • Uusi Asemanseutu – Ristikydön Kehittämissuunnitelma
    Petteri Puputti Uusi asemanseutu – Ristikydön kehittämissuunnitelma Metropolia Ammattikorkeakoulu Insinööri (ylempi AMK) Maanmittaustekniikka Opinnäytetyö 2.6.2019 Tiivistelmä Tekijä Petteri Puputti Otsikko Uusi asemanseutu – Ristikydön kehittämissuunnitelma Sivumäärä 137 sivua + 3 liitettä Aika 2.6.2019 Tutkinto insinööri (ylempi AMK) Tutkinto-ohjelma maanmittaustekniikka lehtori Kaisa Kilpeläinen Ohjaajat kaavoituspäällikkö Pia Sjöroos kuntasuunnittelupäällikkö Asko Honkanen Ristikytö on Tuusulassa sijaitseva maaseutumainen alue Järvenpään ja Keravan välissä, kohdassa, jossa Oikorata haarautuu irti Pääradasta. Liikenneviraston selvityksissä Ristiky- töön on osoitettu asemavaraus Pääradan varteen, ja kuntatasolla on tarkasteltu mahdolli- suutta aseman sijoittamiseksi myös Oikoradan varrelle. Radan tuomat maankäyttömahdol- lisuudet on tunnistettu seututason suunnittelussa. Näistä lähtökohdista laaja, rakentamaton alue ratojen solmukohdassa vaikuttaa erittäin potentiaaliselta maankäytön kehityskohteelta tulevana uutena asemanseutuna. Alueen toteuttamiseen liittyy useita haasteita. Näitä ovat mm. Pääradan eri asemavarausten sijoittuminen hyvin lähellä toisiaan, aseman rakentumisen edellyttämän riittävän käyttäjä- määrän saavuttaminen sekä alueen rakentamisen vaiheistaminen niin, ettei vaaranneta tii- viin asemaympäristön muodostumista. Ristikydön kehittämiseen liittyy myös merkittävä kun- tarakenteellinen ongelma, sillä alue ei sijaitse lähellä Tuusulan nykyisiä taajamakeskuksia. Tuusulan näkökulmasta alueen kehittäminen tarkoittaisikin
    [Show full text]