DOCSLIB.ORG

Rural Railways

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rural Railways House of Commons Transport Committee Rural Railways Fifth Report of Session 2004–05 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 9 March 2005 HC 169-II Incorporating HC 1229-i and ii, Session 2003-04 Published on 21 April 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £14.50 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mrs Gwyneth Dunwoody MP (Labour, Crewe) (Chairman) Mr Jeffrey M Donaldson MP (Democratic Unionist, Lagan Valley) Mr Brian H. Donohoe MP (Labour, Cunninghame South) Clive Efford MP (Labour, Eltham) Mrs Louise Ellman MP (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) Ian Lucas MP (Labour, Wrexham) Miss Anne McIntosh MP (Conservative, Vale of York) Mr Paul Marsden MP (Liberal Democrat, Shrewsbury and Atcham) Mr John Randall MP (Conservative, Uxbridge) Mr George Stevenson MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent South) Mr Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/transcom. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Eve Samson (Clerk), David Bates (Second Clerk), Clare Maltby (Committee Specialist), Philippa Carling (Inquiry Manager), Miss Frances Allingham (Committee Assistant), Miss Michelle Edney (Secretary), Henry Ayi-Hyde (Senior Office Clerk) and James O’Sullivan (Sandwich Student). All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Transport Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6263; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] Witnesses Wednesday 3 November 2004 Page Mr Ingemar Lundin, Director, Jönköping Länstrafik Ev 1 Mr Iain Coucher, Deputy Chief Executive, and Mr Paul Plummer, Director of Corporate Planning, Network Rail; Mr Graham Smith, Planning Director, English, Welsh and Scottish Railway Ev 5 Dr Paul Salveson, General Manager, Association of Community Rail Partnerships (ACoRP), Mrs Sheila Dee, Community Rail Officer, Chester to Shrewsbury Line; Mr Jonathan Denby, Head of Corporate Affairs, One Railway, Bittern Line; Mr Scott Handley, Chief Executive, and Ms Ruth Annison, Marketing Director, Wensleydale Railway plc Ev 13 Wednesday 10 November 2004 Mr Anson Jack, Director of Standards, Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB) Ev 21 Councillor Tony Page, Reading Borough Council and member of LGA Environment Board (Labour transport portfolio holder), Councillor Shona Johnstone, Cambridgeshire County Council and member of LGA Environment Board (Conservative transport portfolio holder), and Mr Vince Christie, Senior Project Officer, LGA, Local Government Association Ev 25 Mr Chris Austin, Executive Director Community Rail Development, and Mr David Hibbs, Assistant Director Community Rail Development, Strategic Rail Authority Ev 30 Wednesday 15 December 2004 Mr Vincent Smith, Director of Competition, Enforcement, and Mr Nooman Haque, Principal Case Officer, Office of Fair Trading Ev 39 Mr Tony McNulty MP, Minister of State, Department for Transport Ev 47 List of written evidence Page RR 01 H. Trevor Jones Ev 57 RR 02 Freightliner Ev 57 RR 03 Bedfordshire Railway and Transport Association Ev 58 RR 04 Alan D Crowhurst Ev 59 RR 05 Gloucestershire County Council Ev 60 RR 06 Tyne Valley Users’ Group Ev 61 RR 07 North Cheshire Rail Users’ Group Ev 63 RR 08 Ludlow Rail Users Ev 66 RR 09 West Midlands Regional Assembly Ev 66 RR 10 Crewe and Shrewsbury Passenger Association Ev 68 RR 11 English Welsh & Scottish Railway Ev 68 RR 12 Shropshire County Council Ev 72 RR 13 ACoRP Ev 74 RR 14 Councillor Donald G Clow Ev 82 RR 15 Local Government Association Ev 83 RR 16 Devon County Council Ev 85 RR 17 Countryside Agency Ev 86 RR 18 Heart of Wales Line forum Ev 88 RR 19 Angus Eickhoff Ev 89 RR 20 Midlands Branch, Rail Future Ev 91 RR 21 Dr John Disney Ev 92 RR 22 Dr Roger Sexton Ev 94 RR 23 Llangollen Railway Trust Ev 95 RR 24 David Dalton Ev 97 RR 25 I D King Ev 99 RR 26 Strategic Rail Authority Ev 101 RR 27 Church Stretton and District Rail Users Association Ev 104 RR 28 The Public Transport Consortium Ev 105 RR 29 Network Rail Ev 106 RR 29A Supplementary memorandum by Network Rail Ev 108 RR 30 Cambrensis Ltd Ev 118 RR 31 Nottinghamshire County Council Ev 108 RR 32 RMT Ev 111 RR 33 Department for Transport Ev 113 RR 33A Supplementary memorandum by the Department for Transport Ev 119 RR 34 Office of Fair Trading Ev 116 Transport Committee: Evidence Ev 1 Oral evidence Taken before the Transport Committee on Wednesday 3 November 2004 Members present: Mrs Gwyneth Dunwoody, in the Chair Mr Brian H Donohoe Ian Lucas Clive EVord Miss Ann McIntosh Witness: Mr Ingemar Lundin, Director, Jo¨nko¨ping La¨nstrafik, examined. Q1 Chairman: Good afternoon, Mr Lundin. Can so it has been twice as much cost for us to use this I begin by warmly welcoming you here and system but still we have a new fleet which means apologising. I understand that your morning has that we have twice as many seats on board trains. been a bit eventful. I am very sorry that you should have lost your case and I apologise on behalf of Q5 Chairman: Did the subsidy come from the London if not on behalf of the United Kingdom. central government or from the local government? We are enormously grateful to you for giving Mr Lundin: Most of the taxpayers’ money goes to evidence to us today because we think what you the local or regional level. That means our owner have to say to us is going to be very important. puts in this money and also makes the decision May I begin by asking you to tell us your name about buying the new rolling stock. Our owner is and your oYcial title and then perhaps you have the county council and its 13 municipalities. something to say before we go to questions. Mr Lundin: I am very happy to be here in London. Q6 Chairman: They decided to spend the 320 I had some illustrations in my bag but you will get million Swedish krone? those later. I am managing director for a public Mr Lundin: Yes, as an investment in the future. transport authority in Sweden, in Jo¨nko¨ping. It is They have also been responsible for decisions about quite a rural area with a regional centre of about running the old trains before at lower cost. The 105,000 inhabitants and I have been responsible for county council’s main expense is for health care. the rail service since 1985. I have been managing 95% of their budget is for health care and 2% for director for 24 years. During that time, we have public transport. That means that they are giving been the first place in Sweden to have a private some priority between public transport and operator in early 1990. That is the reason why we health care. have visitors from the Ministry of Transport in the UK, to see if it could be possible to have private Q7 Chairman: Was there any central government operators. Today we come to you and look at your subsidy? railway system. Mr Lundin: There is a central government subsidy which is about one third of the costs for these Q2 Chairman: How much does the railway network rural railway. in Jo¨nko¨ping cost? Mr Lundin: It is a net contract that we have. That Q8 Chairman: When you say “costs” are we talking was one of the figures in the papers so perhaps I about operational costs or capital costs? could come back on that. Mr Lundin: Gross costs, including capital costs, in what we are giving to operators. A fee for using Q3 Chairman: What proportion is covered by fares? the rail, for example, is included in the £4 per Mr Lundin: Yes. The costs are per kilometre, kilometre. approximately £4 per kilometre. From there it is our cost. As it is a net contract, that means that Q9 Chairman: How do you get the funding to the operator has the income, the fares. From our reopen lines? I understand that you have not just point of view, the relation between income and cost been running the existing railway but you have is about 45% in the present system but it is very opened up some more lines that had been closed. important also to illustrate that, by this new Is that right? system, we have invested about 320 million Swedish Mr Lundin: In a way, yes. It is more that we have krone in new rolling stock. You have to divide it taken over responsibility for the state railways. by 13 to have it in pounds. There was a Transport Act in 1988 in which the public transport authorities handed over the Q4 Chairman: Was that just the rolling stock? responsibility for all regional service, including Mr Lundin: Yes. Before that we had old trains with rural service. Many of those lines had a rail service no capital cost and no train crew on board, just the before but it was a long distance rail service.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Railfuture RAIL USER EXPRESS Welcome to This Edition of Rail User
    railfuture RAIL USER EXPRESS 29 May 2011 Welcome to this edition of Rail User Express. Please support Britain’s number one As always, feel free to forward RUEx to a colleague, or to reproduce advocate for the items in your own newsletter (quoting sources). If you want further details railways and rail users! of any of the stories mentioned, look on the relevant website or, failing that, get back to me so I can send you the full text. For details about group We begin with a roundup of news from rail user groups around the affiliation to Railfuture, UK. I‟m grateful to RUGs that send me their magazines and bulletins. contact David Harby Follow Railfuture on Twitter! Just add us to your Twitter account. Look for us @Railfuture GUEST RAIL USER GROUP OF THE MONTH Action Rail Monifieth contact Following my recent enquiry to this group in the Tayside area of Scotland, their Secretary, Councillor John Whyte, kindly replied with some background information about ARM: “The local rail service in and around Dundee is amongst the worst in the UK, far less just us in Scotland! Currently, Invergowrie and Monifeith have just two stopping trains a day(!!) and Broughty Ferry has three stopping trains. The population denied an adequate train service between Monifieth and Broughty Ferry is over 25,000! If this situation were replicated in any other similar area, anywhere in the UK, it would not be tolerated! “ARM is active in trying to get Network Rail, Transport Scotland and First ScotRail fully on board with this lousy rail service and is meeting with some success.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Network
    Milton Keynes, London Birmingham and the North Victoria Watford Junction London Brentford Waterloo Syon Lane Windsor & Shepherd’s Bush Eton Riverside Isleworth Hounslow Kew Bridge Kensington (Olympia) Datchet Heathrow Chiswick Vauxhall Airport Virginia Water Sunnymeads Egham Barnes Bridge Queenstown Wraysbury Road Longcross Sunningdale Whitton TwickenhamSt. MargaretsRichmondNorth Sheen BarnesPutneyWandsworthTown Clapham Junction Staines Ashford Feltham Mortlake Wimbledon Martins Heron Strawberry Earlsfield Ascot Hill Croydon Tramlink Raynes Park Bracknell Winnersh Triangle Wokingham SheppertonUpper HallifordSunbury Kempton HamptonPark Fulwell Teddington Hampton KingstonWick Norbiton New Oxford, Birmingham Winnersh and the North Hampton Court Malden Thames Ditton Berrylands Chertsey Surbiton Malden Motspur Reading to Gatwick Airport Chessington Earley Bagshot Esher TolworthManor Park Hersham Crowthorne Addlestone Walton-on- Bath, Bristol, South Wales Reading Thames North and the West Country Camberley Hinchley Worcester Beckenham Oldfield Park Wood Park Junction South Wales, Keynsham Trowbridge Byfleet & Bradford- Westbury Brookwood Birmingham Bath Spaon-Avon Newbury Sandhurst New Haw Weybridge Stoneleigh and the North Reading West Frimley Elmers End Claygate Farnborough Chessington Ewell West Byfleet South New Bristol Mortimer Blackwater West Woking West East Addington Temple Meads Bramley (Main) Oxshott Croydon Croydon Frome Epsom Taunton, Farnborough North Exeter and the Warminster Worplesdon West Country Bristol Airport Bruton Templecombe
    [Show full text]
  • Community Rail in the North COMMUNITY RAIL in the NORTH
    Community rail in the North COMMUNITY RAIL IN THE NORTH Community rail is a unique and growing movement comprising more than 70 community rail partnerships and 1,000 volunteer groups across Britain that help communities get the most from their railways. It is about engaging local people at grassroots level to promote social inclusion, sustainable and healthy travel, Community groups on the Northern wellbeing, economic development, and tourism. network have always been at the This involves working with train operators, local “ forefront of community engagement. authorities, and other partners to highlight local needs An increasing number of communities and opportunities, ensuring communities have a voice and individuals are benefitting from in rail and transport development. “ initiatives and projects that break down barriers, foster a more inclusive Community rail is evidenced to contribute high levels society, and build foundations for a of social, environmental, and economic value to local more sustainable future. areas, and countless stations have been transformed into hubs at the heart of the communities they serve. Carolyn Watson, Northern Evidence also shows community rail delivering life-changing benefits for individuals and families, helping people access new opportunities through sustainable travel by rail. The movement is currently looking to play a key role in the recovery of our communities post-COVID, helping them build back better and greener. The North in numbers: 20 Working along railway lines, with community industry partners, to engage local rail communities. Partnerships stretch partnerships from the Tyne Valley in Northumberland Each Year Giving (CRPs) down to Crewe in Cheshire. 0 140,000 0 Hours 350 Voluntary groups bringing stations into the heart of communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Off Brook Hill Lane, Dunford Bridge, Barnsley, Sheffield
    2019/1013 Applicant: National Grid Description: Planning application for National Grid's Visual Impact Provision (VIP) project involving the following works:1) Construction of a new sealing end compound, including permanent access; 2) Construction of a temporary haul road from Brook Hill Lane including widened bellmouth; 3) Construction of a temporary Trans Pennine Trail Diversion to be used for approximately 12 - 18 months; following construction approximately 410m of said diversion surface would be retained permanently; and 4) Erection of two bridges (one temporary and one permanent) along the Trans Pennine Trail diversion Site Address: Land off Brook Hill Lane, Dunford Bridge, Barnsley, Sheffield Site Description The site stretches from Dunford Bridge in the Peak District National Park to Wogden Foot LWS approximately 1.8km to the east. With the exception of the sealing end compounds at either end, the site is linear and broadly follows the route of the Trans Pennine Trail (TPT). At Dunford Bridge the site extends to the former rail tunnel entrance and includes the existing sealing end compound located behind properties on Don View. Beyond this is the TPT car park and the TPT itself which is a former rail line running from Dunford Bridge to Penistone; now utilised as a bridleway. The site takes in land adjacent the TPT along which a temporary diverted bridleway route is proposed. In addition, Wogden Foot, a Local Wildlife Site (LWS) located 1.8km to the east is included (in part) as the proposed location of a new sealing end compound; construction access to this from Windle Edge also forms part for the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Politician Overboard: Jumping the Party Ship
    INFORMATION, ANALYSIS AND ADVICE FOR THE PARLIAMENT INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES Research Paper No. 4 2002–03 Politician Overboard: Jumping the Party Ship DEPARTMENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY ISSN 1328-7478 Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2003 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 2003 I NFORMATION AND R ESEARCH S ERVICES Research Paper No. 4 2002–03 Politician Overboard: Jumping the Party Ship Sarah Miskin Politics and Public Administration Group 24 March 2003 Acknowledgments I would like to thank Martin Lumb and Janet Wilson for their help with the research into party defections in Australia and Cathy Madden, Scott Bennett, David Farrell and Ben Miskin for reading and commenting on early drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No. 51
    Page 1 SARPA Newsletter 51 SARPA Newsletter 51 Page 1 Shrewsbury Newsletter Aberystwyth Rail No. 51 Passengers’ August 2010 Association The station with the hump. Aberdovey in the early 1960’s, with No.82033 arriving with a down train. Chairman’s Message..................................................................................................3 News in Brief...............................................................................................................4 When the Computer says No......................................................................................8 AUF WIEDERSEHEN Status Quo............................................................. ...............10 More Cambrian Railways Partnership leaflets..........................................................12 The view from milepost 61 by the Brigadier..............................................................13 Network Rail Reports................................................................................................15 Vale of Rheidol Railway upgrade...............................................................................17 SARPA meetings......................................................................................................18 Websites...................................................................................................................19 Useful addresses......................................................................................................20 Officers of the Association........................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Railways List
    A guide and list to a collection of Historic Railway Documents www.railarchive.org.uk to e mail click here December 2017 1 Since July 1971, this private collection of printed railway documents from pre grouping and pre nationalisation railway companies based in the UK; has sought to expand it‟s collection with the aim of obtaining a printed sample from each independent railway company which operated (or obtained it‟s act of parliament and started construction). There were over 1,500 such companies and to date the Rail Archive has sourced samples from over 800 of these companies. Early in 2001 the collection needed to be assessed for insurance purposes to identify a suitable premium. The premium cost was significant enough to warrant a more secure and sustainable future for the collection. In 2002 The Rail Archive was set up with the following objectives: secure an on-going future for the collection in a public institution reduce the insurance premium continue to add to the collection add a private collection of railway photographs from 1970‟s onwards provide a public access facility promote the collection ensure that the collection remains together in perpetuity where practical ensure that sufficient finances were in place to achieve to above objectives The archive is now retained by The Bodleian Library in Oxford to deliver the above objectives. This guide which gives details of paperwork in the collection and a list of railway companies from which material is wanted. The aim is to collect an item of printed paperwork from each UK railway company ever opened.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is an Electronic Reprint of the Original Article. This Reprint May Differ from the Original in Pagination and Typographic Detail
    This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Author(s): Häkkinen, Teemu Title: Challenging the Royal Prerogative : the Decision on War against Iraq in Parliamentary Debates in 2002–3 Year: 2016 Version: Please cite the original version: Häkkinen, T. (2016). Challenging the Royal Prerogative : the Decision on War against Iraq in Parliamentary Debates in 2002–3. Parliamentary History, 35(1), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-0206.12184 All material supplied via JYX is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication or sale of all or part of any of the repository collections is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for your research use or educational purposes in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered, whether for sale or otherwise to anyone who is not an authorised user. 1 Challenging the Royal Prerogative: The Decision on War against Iraq in Parliamentary Debates in 2002–3 Teemu Häkkinen University of Jyvaskyla Abstract The use of military force is an excellent example of how the decision-making process has traditionally been carried out by the executive. However, the role of parliamentary decision-making in this area has gradually emerged as a topic for constitutional discussion in the house of commons. The decision to go to war in Iraq in 2002−3 is considered to have been a culmination point for the role of parliament in decision making about the deployment of troops abroad and the use of military force.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices
    Long Term Planning Process West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices August 2017 Contents August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 02 Technical Appendices 03 A1 - Midlands Rail Hub: Central Birmingham 04 elements A2 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 11 Nottingham/Leicester elements A3 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 17 Worcester/Hereford via Bromsgrove elements A4 - Chiltern Route 24 A5 - Birmingham to Leamington Spa via 27 Coventry A6 - Passenger capacity at stations 30 A7 - Business Case analysis 50 Technical Appendicies August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 03 Introduction to Technical Appendices Cost estimation These Technical Appendices provide the technical evidence to Cost estimates have been prepared for interventions or packages of support the conclusions and choices for funders presented in the interventions proposed in the Route Study. The estimates are based main Route Study document. The areas of technical analysis on the pre-GRIP data available, concept drawings and high level outlined in these appendices are capability analysis, concept specification of the intervention scope. To reflect the level of development (at pre-GRIP level), cost estimation, business case information available to support the estimate production, a analysis and passenger capacity analysis at stations. contingency sum of 60% has been added. The estimates do not include inflation. Indicative cost ranges have been provided based The appendices are presented by geographical area with the on this assessment. exception of the business case analysis and passenger capacity analysis. Business case analysis The areas of technical analysis are summarised below. Business case analysis has been undertaken to demonstrate to funders whether a potential investment option is affordable and Capability Analysis offers value for money.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Ideas for Discovering the Best of the Broads by Cycle
    Great ideas for discovering the best of the Broads by cycle • On-road cycling routes using quiet lanes, and traffic-free cycle ways • Tips on where to cycle, taking your bike on a train and bus, and where to stop off Use a cycle to explore the tranquil beauty and natural treasures of the wetland landscapes that make up the Broads – a unique area characterised by windmills, grazing marshes, boating scenes, vast skies, reedy waters and historic settlements. There are idyllically quiet lanes and virtually no hills. If you’re touring the Broads by boat, you can stop off for a while and hire bikes from several places by the water, and see some of the area’s many other attractions. Cycling in the Broads gets you to places public transport cannot reach, and you see much that you might otherwise miss from a car or even a boat. It’s also a healthy and environmentally friendly way of getting around. Centre: How Hill (photo: Tim Locke); left and right: cycling round the Broads (photos: Broads Authority) Contents An introduction to discovering the Broads by bike, offering several itineraries in one. It starts with details of using the Bittern Line to get you to Hoveton & Wroxham, where you can hire a bike and follow Broads Bike Trails, or cycle alongside the Bure Valley Railway; how to join up with the BroadsHopper bus from rail stations; ideas for cycling in the Ludham and Hickling area; and some highlights of Sustrans NCN Route 1 from Norwich. The Broads Bike Hire Network of seven cycle hirers is listed in the last section.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Periodicals
    Railway Studies Collection : list of periodicals The following is a list of periodicals and newsletters currently held in the Railway Studies Collection in Newton Abbot Library. A Archive * No 1, 1994 to date Association of Railway Preservation Societies Newsletters/Journals Nos 1-40,56-121, 123-155, 160-208, 212-225 Atlantic Coast Express* (see also Bideford & Instow Railway Group No 13, 21, 22, 40, 42-63, 65, 81 & 83 to date B Back Track * No 1, 1987 to date Barrowmore Model Railway Journal No 1 to date Beyer Peacock Quarterly Review 1927-32 Bideford & Instow Railway Group (continued as Atlantic Coast (to No. 21) Express) Big Four (Worcester Locomotive Society) Nos 35/38 Bishop’s Castle Railway Society Journal Nos 6-10, Black Eight (Stanier 8F Locomotive Society) Nos 3, 43-66, 68, 71,73,74,86, 90-92,95 Blastpipe (Scottish RPS) 1975 to 1980 – 2007 Bluebell News (Kent and East Sussex Railway) Summer 1979, 1980/81 & 1990 to date Bodmin and Wenford News (B & WRPS) No 13, 1990 to date Nos 103-201 & 203-205, 209 – 264 & 1972- Branch Line News 1975 to date Branch Line Review Mar, Jul 1964, Jan, Apr 1965 Autumn ’94, Jul, Oct ’94, Mar, Oct ’96. Mar, Bridgend Valleys Railway Society Newsletter Nov ‘97 The Brighton Circular (L.B.S.C.R.) 1975 to date British Railway Journal * No 1 1983 to date Apr 1993, May 1994, Dec 1995, Jun 1999, Jul British Railway Modelling 2001, Apr 2002, Oct 2005. British Railways Historical Study Group No 1 1977 to 1980 British Railways Illustrated * No 1 1991 to date British Railways Magazine Eastern Region – CD 1948 - 1963 British Railways Magazine Southern Region Feb - Jun 1963 British Railways Southern Region Magazine 1949, vol 2 no 12 1951, vol 5 no 7 1954 British Steam Railways Nos 7,9,10 2004, No 17 2005 1948-49, Nos 1,5 1953, 1957-58, 1959-60 vol.6 no.3 1955, vol.8 nos 1-12 1957, vol11 no B.
    [Show full text]