DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Resource Inventory and Assessment (WRIA) Summary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Resource Inventory and Assessment (WRIA) Summary Report U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge Water Resource Inventory and Assessment (WRIA) Summary Report March 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 (Midwest Region) Division of Natural Resources and Conservation Planning; Bloomington, MN The mission of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish and wildlife and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. The mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System is to administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management and, where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans. Authors: Susan Gerlach and Linnea Thomas Correspondence: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 (Midwest) Division of Biological Resources 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 990 Bloomington, MN 55437-1458 [email protected] Author’s Note: There are embedded links throughout this document within the table of contents and indicated by underlined text. A database of the presented data, additional data, documents and the referenced studies will be available as part of a digital document library housed on the Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS). Geospatial data layers were obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, USGS seamless server, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Missouri Spatial Data Information Services website. Disclaimer: All data is provided “as is.” There are no warranties, express or implied, including the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, accompanying this document. Use for general planning and informational purposes only. (This page intentionally left blank) Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Findings .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 5 2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8 3. Natural Setting ....................................................................................................................11 3.1 Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUCs) .........................................................................................11 3.2 Topography .......................................................................................................................13 3.3 Long Term Climate Trends ...............................................................................................15 Climate Conditions and Projected Changes .................................................................................. 15 PRISM, USHCN, and NCEI Datasets ............................................................................................ 18 Hydroclimatic Data Network ........................................................................................................... 21 4. Water Resource Features ...................................................................................................23 4.1 Management Units and Infrastructure .............................................................................23 Little Creek ..................................................................................................................................... 28 Pigeon Creek ................................................................................................................................. 28 Water Management ........................................................................................................................ 29 Additional Management Activities .................................................................................................. 30 High Hazard Dam Information ....................................................................................................... 31 Crab Orchard Dam ......................................................................................................................... 31 Little Grassy Dam ........................................................................................................................... 31 Devil’s Kitchen Dam ....................................................................................................................... 32 4.2 National Wetlands Inventory ............................................................................................33 4.3 National Hydrography Dataset .........................................................................................36 5. Water Resource Monitoring ...............................................................................................39 5.1 Water Quality Criteria........................................................................................................39 5.2 Water Monitoring Stations and Sampling Sites ..............................................................42 5.3 Surface Water Quantity .....................................................................................................45 Crab Orchard Creek near Marion, IL ............................................................................................. 45 Big Muddy River at RTE 127 at Murphysboro, IL .......................................................................... 50 Crab Orchard Lake, Little Grassy Lake, and Devil’s Kitchen Lake ................................................ 54 5.4 Groundwater Levels ..........................................................................................................56 5.5 Surface Water Quality .......................................................................................................58 CERCLA Cleanup Activities ........................................................................................................... 58 Other Water Quality Concerns ....................................................................................................... 59 303(b) reporting, 303(d) assessments ........................................................................................... 61 Contaminants Assessment Process .............................................................................................. 64 Point sources and contaminant releases ....................................................................................... 65 6. Water Law ............................................................................................................................66 7. Geospatial Data Sources ....................................................................................................69 8. Literature Cited ...................................................................................................................73 Appendix A: Climate Data ......................................................................................................75 Appendix B: Management Units and Infrastructure .............................................................79 Appendix C: Relevant Water Monitoring Locations ...........................................................101 Appendix D: Water Monitoring Data ....................................................................................106 Appendix E: Additional CERCLA Cleanup Information ......................................................114 Appendix F: Point Sources and Toxic Release Inventory Information ............................. 117 Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge – Water Resource Inventory and Assessment i Figures Figure 2-1: Reference map of CONWR ...................................................................................................... 10 Figure 3-1: Hydrologic Unit Codes contributing or adjacent to CONWR properties ................................... 12 Figure 3-2: LiDAR and bathymetry data for CONWR ................................................................................. 14 Figure 3-3: Warm season evaporation rates at Illinois State Climatologist Office site 11-2352 near Dixon Springs, IL ................................................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 3-4: Climate station information relevant to CONWR ...................................................................... 19 Figure 3-5: Average monthly discharge data for HCDN gage Rayse Creek near Waltonville, IL .............. 22 Figure 4-1: Historic and current drainage in the I-57 Wetland Unit area .................................................... 25 Figure 4-2: Beaver dams found at West Gate ............................................................................................ 26 Figure 4-3: Wetland types found at CONWR .............................................................................................. 34 Figure 4-4: Map of NHD flowlines at CONWR ............................................................................................ 37 Figure 5-1: Locations of applicable surface water, groundwater, and climate monitoring stations ............ 44 Figure 5-2: Average annual discharge data for Crab Orchard Creek near Marion, IL...............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fuller’S Leadership and Over- Vincent of the Refuge Staff Are Notable for Having Sight Were Invaluable
    Acknowledgments Acknowledgments Many people have contributed to this plan over many detailed and technical requirements of sub- the last seven years. Several key staff positions, missions to the Service, the Environmental Protec- including mine, have been filled by different people tion Agency, and the Federal Register. Jon during the planning period. Tom Palmer and Neil Kauffeld’s and Nita Fuller’s leadership and over- Vincent of the Refuge staff are notable for having sight were invaluable. We benefited from close col- been active in the planning for the entire extent. laboration and cooperation with staff of the Illinois Tom and Neil kept the details straight and the rest Department of Natural Resources. Their staff par- of us on track throughout. Mike Brown joined the ticipated from the early days of scoping through staff in the midst of the process and contributed new reviews and re-writes. We appreciate their persis- insights, analysis, and enthusiasm that kept us mov- tence, professional expertise, and commitment to ing forward. Beth Kerley and John Magera pro- our natural resources. Finally, we value the tremen- vided valuable input on the industrial and public use dous involvement of citizens throughout the plan- aspects of the plan. Although this is a refuge plan, ning process. We heard from visitors to the Refuge we received notable support from our regional office and from people who care about the Refuge without planning staff. John Schomaker provided excep- ever having visited. Their input demonstrated a tional service coordinating among the multiple level of caring and thought that constantly interests and requirements within the Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Perry County, Illinois Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan A 2015 Update of the 2009 Countywide MHMP Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Perry County, Illinois Adoption Date: -- _______________________ -- Primary Point of Contact Secondary Point of Contact David H. Searby, Jr. Raymond D. Clark EMA Coordinator ESDA Coordinator Perry County Emergency Management Agency Du Quoin ESDA Perry County Courthouse – Room #15 P.O. Box Pinckneyville, IL 62274 Du Quoin, IL 62832 Phone: (618) 357-6221 Phone: (618) 542-3841 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Acknowledgements The Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan would not have been possible without the incredible feedback, input, and expertise provided by the County leadership, citizens, staff, federal and state agencies, and volunteers. We would like to give special thank you to the citizens not mentioned below who freely gave their time and input in hopes of building a stronger, more progressive County. Perry County gratefully acknowledges the following people for the time, energy and resources given to create the Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. Perry County Board of Commissioners Robert D. Kelly, Chairman Sam Robb James Epplin 2014 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Steering Committee David Searby, EMA Coordinator, Perry County Emergency Management Agency Raymond Clark, ESDA Coordinator, Du Quoin Emergency Services and Disaster Agency Joyce Rheal, EMA Staff, Perry County Emergency Management Agency Shane Malawy, Administrator, Pinckneyville Ambulance Service Steve Behm, Lieutenant, Perry County Sheriff Bruce Reppert, EMA Staff, Perry County Emergency Management Agency Sandra Webster, Director, American Red Cross Little Egypt Network James Gielow, Chief, Pinckneyville Fire Department / Pinckneyville Rural Fire Protection District Krista Mulholland, Perry County Health Department ii Perry County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Section 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Muddy River Bottoms Habitat Improvement
    Environmental Assessment BIG MUDDY RIVER BOTTOMS HABITAT IMPROVEMENT United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service April 2005 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. For Information Contact: National Environmental Policy Act Coordinator The Shawnee National Forest 50 Hwy 145 South, Harrisburg, IL 62946 (618) 253-7114 This document can be accessed on the Shawnee National Forest website at www.fs.fed.us/r9/forests/shawnee. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY…………………………………………………………….. ……. 4 II. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………… 5 Document Structure………………………………………………………………. 5 Purpose of and Need for Action………………………………………………….. 7 Proposed Action………………………………………………………………….. 8 Decision Framework……………………………………………………………… 8 Public Involvement……………………………………………………………….. 8 Issues and Scope of the Environmental Assessment………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar Camp Energy, LLC Mine No. 1 Expansion - Revision 6 EIS
    Document Type: EIS-Administrative Record Index Field: Final EIS Project Name: Sugar Camp Mine No. 1 Project Number: 2019-28 SUGAR CAMP ENERGY, LLC MINE NUMBER 1 – BOUNDARY REVISION 6 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Franklin and Hamilton Counties, Illinois Lead Agency: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Knoxville, Tennessee Cooperating Agency: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Chicago, Illinois October 2020 This page intentionally left blank COVER SHEET Sugar Camp Energy, LLC Mine No. 1 Expansion - Revision 6 EIS Proposed action: The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) proposes to authorize the mining of TVA-owned coal, currently leased to Sugar Camp Energy, LLC, underlying approximately 12,125 acres in southern Illinois. Associated actions include the planned subsidence of much of the mined area, the construction of five Bleeder Shaft Facilities, and the processing of the coal at an existing Coal Preparation Plant. Type of document: Final Environmental Impact Statement Lead agency: Tennessee Valley Authority Cooperating agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency To request information, contact: Elizabeth Smith Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive, WT11B Knoxville, Tennessee 37902-1499 E-Mail: [email protected] Abstract: TVA evaluates a No Action and Action Alternative in this EIS. The Action Alternative consists of TVA approving the extraction of TVA-owned coal from an area of approximately 12,125 acres, the construction and operation of five Bleeder Shaft Facilities, and the planned subsidence of the ground surface above the extracted coal. Connected actions include processing, storing, and transporting the extracted coal via existing and proposed facilities. Under the No Action Alternative, TVA would not approve the extraction of the TVA-owned coal, and extracting, processing, storing, and transporting other coal in the area would continue.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved by Di-L-R1-~~=F
    FISHERY MANAGEMENT Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge r Carterville, Illinois 62918 ··~ i Submitted by c::1:4;,h /) ~----- ,. Project anager Date ld--/.3- i.l I. Date t'J. L' 3 I (AF) lf'lh Date ;yUt/r~ 1 (AW) le for Approv Date ;Yfk I Regional Director Approved Date I/~~~ _____ / I by_Di-L-r1-~~=f---=::.l_._'.~.....,....J.,Gu~~~:t:!:::-.) / } i l. FWS 4-16-0003-86-903 4lt COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS AND THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR I. PURPOSE This cooperative agreement between the Department of Conservation of the State of Illinois, hereafter referred to as the Department, and the u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, hereafter referred to as the Service is hereby entered into under the authority of 16 USC 742f(a)(4) and 757a; and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401) as amended. It is the intent of this agreement to facilitate the cooperation of the two agencies in administering the fishery program on Crab Orchard National Refuge, hereafter referred to as the Refuge. Specific direction for managing the fish resources of the Refuge is contained in a Fish Management Plan approved in 1983~ This Plan states the broad goals for fish management and outlines on a lake by lake basis the steps necessary to achieve these goals. II. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AGENCIES The Servite has the lead responsibility for fish resource management on the Refuge. These responsibilities include furnishing personnel, materials, services and facilities necessary to achieve fish management goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Illinois Invasive Species Strike Team
    Southern Illinois Invasive Species Strike Team January, 2016 – April, 2017 Report Southern Illinois Invasive Species Strike Team January 2016 – April 2017 Report Prepared by: Caleb Grantham – Invasive Species Strike Team Member This program was funded through: A grant supported by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the United States Forest Service, The Nature Conservancy, and the River to River Cooperative Weed Management Area, and the Shawnee RC&D. - 0 - | P a g e Acknowledgements This program was funded through a grant supported by the United States Forest Service, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, The Nature Conservancy, and the River to River Cooperative Weed Management Area, and the Shawnee RC&D. Contributions to this report were provided by: Caleb Grantham, Cody Langan, and Nick Seaton Invasive Species Strike Team; Kevin Rohling, River to River Cooperative Weed Management Area; Jody Shimp, Shawnee RC&D; Tharran Hobson, The Nature Conservancy; Shannan Sharp and Nate Hein, United States Forest Service; David Jones, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Equal opportunity to participate in programs of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) and those funded by the U.S.D.A Forest Service and other agencies is available to all individuals regardless of race, sex, national origin, disability, age, religion or other non-merit factors. If you believe you have been discriminated against, contact the funding source’s civil rights office and/or the Equal Employment Opportunity Officer, IDNR, One Natural Resources Way, Springfield, IL. 62702-1271; 217/782-2262; TTY 217/782-9175.
    [Show full text]
  • A Floristic Study of a Southern Illinois Swampy Area
    No. 2 NEW SPECIES OF CTENICERA 89 A FLORISTIC STUDY OF A SOUTHERN ILLINOIS SWAMPY AREA ROBERT H. MOHLENBROCK Department of Botany, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois In the western part of Union County in southwestern Illinois is a unique area of swamps and woodlands of low ground. This paper is an endeavor to discuss floristic relationships of the species of vascular plants which occur in this area. These swamps of Union County occur in the following sections of T 11 S, R 3 W: 9, 16, 17, 21, 28, and 33. * A small portion of T 12 S, R 3 W, sections 3 and 4 is also included (fig. 1). Within this area, numerous habitat types are found. This study deals only with the floristics of the swamp-inhabiting plants. A high range of hills forms the eastern border of the swamp. At the western limits of these hills, massive limestone bluffs which once bordered the Mississippi River are exposed. These often nearly vertical bluffs are in places almost 350 feet high. They are dissected by numerous east-west ravines which are covered with dense vegetation. Hill prairies are located along the western-facing edges of many of these bluffs. These treeless areas are minute replicas of prairies to the west. The swamp vegetation is found in an area from one-eighth of a mile to nearly a mile wide and for a length of about six miles. The southern end of the area is occupied by a finger-shaped lake known as Wolf Lake. The lake extends for nearly two miles, becoming shallower at its northern end where it gives rise to a deep swamp.
    [Show full text]
  • Crab Orchard Orchard Crab fishing
    of the three lakes per season) per lakes three the of (permit allows the organization to host 1 fish-off at each each at fish-off 1 host to organization the allows (permit $35.00 per organization organization per $35.00 Permit Fish-off events and rental fees. rental and events For specialized uses such as group activities, recreational recreational activities, group as such uses specialized For Special Recreation Permit Fees Permit Recreation Special overlapping the state registration. registration. state the overlapping to the vessel on the port (left) bow next to, but not not but to, next bow (left) port the on vessel the to In order for the pass to be valid it must be affixed directly directly affixed be must it valid be to pass the for order In campgrounds. are available at the refuge visitor center and and center visitor refuge the at available are discounted, therefore all additional passes are $ 5.00. $ are passes additional all therefore discounted, vehicles and boats using the refuge. Passes Passes refuge. the using boats and vehicles Use Fees. Additional annual vessel passes are already already are passes vessel annual Additional Fees. Use Entrance and User fees are required for all all for required are fees User and Entrance authorized a 50% discount of the full value price for Lake Lake for price value full the of discount 50% a authorized Recreation Use Fees Use Recreation ■ Holders of Interagency Senior and Access Pass are are Pass Access and Senior Interagency of Holders or on grass or other vegetation is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Affected Environment
    Chapter 3:Affected Environment Chapter 3: Affected Environment 3.1 Introduction Chapter 3 provides an overview of Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge and the resources it pro- vides in terms of habitat, wildlife and people. 3.2 Physical Environment 3.2.1 Physiography The physiography of the northern and southern portions of the Refuge is quite different. The terrain of the northern portion of the Refuge is character- ized by low relief, broad valleys, and relatively well- developed drainage systems while the southern por- tion of the Refuge is uplands with narrow ridges dis- sected by deep, narrow valleys with steep slopes and numerous sandstone outcrops. The northern portion of the Refuge is covered with a heterogeneous mixture of rock fragments ranging in size from clay to boulders deposited by glaciers on bedrock. Generally the slopes in the area are less than 3 percent. The southern portion of the Refuge is part of a continuous ridge extending from Prairie restoration, Crab Orchard NWR Battery Rock on the Ohio River to Horseshoe Bluff overlooking the Mississippi River. The hills are highly dissected uplands with little flat land and 3.2.2 Geology nearly all of the area has steep slopes, most in The bedrock underlying the Refuge is of Pennsyl- excess of 10 percent slope. vanian age. In the northern part of the Refuge, the The Refuge's elevation ranges from less than 380 bedrock is covered by a thin layer of glacial till of feet above mean sea level at Crab Orchard Creek in Illinoian age. During the Wisconsin glacial age, the Jackson County to over 740 feet at the southeast weathered Illinoian glacial till was covered by the corner of the Refuge in Union County.
    [Show full text]
  • WMRC Reports Waste Management and Research Center
    WMRC Reports Waste Management and Research Center Seasonal/Tel11poral and Spatial Patterns of PCB Contal11ination of fishes in Crab Orchard Lake Christopher C. Kohler, Roy C. Heidinger Southern Illinois University RR-E72 January 1994 Electronic Version About WMRC's Electronic Publications: This document was originally published in a traditional format It has been transferred to an electronic format to allow faster and broader access to important information and data While the Center makes every effort to maintain a level of quality during the transfer from print to digital format, it is possible that minor formatting and typographical inconsistencies will still exist in this document Additionally, due to the constraints of the electronic format chosen, page numbering will vary slightly from the original document The original, printed version of this document may still be available Please contact WMRC for more information WMRC One E. Hazelwood Drive Champaign, IL 61820 217-333-8940 (phone) www.wmrc.uiuc.edu WMRC is a division of the Illinois Department of Natural NATURAL RESOURCES Resources HWRIC RR-072 SeasonallTemporal and Spatial Patterns of PCB Contamination of Fishes in Crab Orchard Lake by Christopher C Kohler and Roy C Heidinger Cooperative Fisheries Research Laboratory Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Illinois 62901 Prepared for Hazardous Waste Research and Information Center One East Hazelwood Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 HWRIC Project Number HWR 90-027 Printed by Authority of the State of Illinois 94/250 This report is part of HWRIC's Research Report Series Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use CONTENTS TABLES iv FIGURES vi ABSTRACT vii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 BACKGROUND 1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES 2 CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 5 STUDY SITE DESCRIPTION 5 SAMPLE COLLECTION 5 SAMPLE PREPARATION 6 PCB ANALYSIS 7 LIPID ANALYSIS 11 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS .
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Prairies 101
    Illinois Department of Natural Resources Division of Education One Natural Resources Way Springfield, IL 62702 ENTICE – Environment and Nature Training Institute for Conservation Education Illinois Prairies 101 Part I Geology Many factors interact to determine the vegetation of any site, regardless of size. Bedrock geology, glacial history, soils, moisture, climate, grazing animals, and fire have combined to directly influence the distribution of prairies and forests within Illinois. With a different climate, glacial history or fire history, the vegetation of Illinois would have been vastly different from that observed and described by the French explorers when they arrived in the late 1600s. Some of these factors, such as bedrock, are largely obscured in Illinois by a thick layer of till deposited by the action of glaciers many thousands of years ago. The only places where bedrock is exposed are along the deeply incised valleys of the Illinois, Mississippi, Ohio and Wabash rivers and their tributaries, or along fault lines at various locations throughout the state. The bedrock of Illinois resulted from the deposition of marine organisms during the Paleozoic and Mesozoic eras in the period 65 to 570 million years ago. Bedrock from these two geologic time periods differs not just in age, but also in location and thickness. Paleozoic bedrock, the most widely distributed, is present throughout much of Illinois. Its maximum thickness is approximately 14,000 feet compared to the maximum thickness of only 500 feet for Mesozoic era bedrock present in southern Illinois. The most common and probably best-known type of bedrock in Illinois is limestone, a sedimentary rock formed at the bottom of ancient seas mostly by the deposition of shells, coral skeletons, and secretions from certain types of algae.
    [Show full text]
  • CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Carterville
    CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Carterville, Illinois ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1981 U. S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Carterville, Illinois ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1981 U. S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM Front Row (left to right) Middle Row (left to right) Back Row (left to right) 27. Jim Cox 10. Joe DeJulio 28. Bob Howell 36. Doyle Case 39. Terry Rendleman 26. George Beckwith 21. Dan Eastman 24. Bob Venegoni 13. Layman Summers 2. Jerry Updike 32. Chuck Adams 3. Ross Adams 9. Lonnie Priest 33. Gilbert Hanks 31. Ray Goldsmith 7. Jim Cameron 41. Karon Keeler 34. Russell Massie 20. Roy Taylor 8. Donna Stanley 40. Bob Swidergal 1. Wayne Adams 37. Bonnie Dungey 5. George Stapleton 38. Marsolie McCarty I Crab Orchard NWR Personnel - 1/9/82 1. Wayne D. Adams Project Manager GS-13 PFT 2. Gerald H. Updike Assistant Project Manager GS-12 PFT 3. N. Ross Adams Wildlife Biologist GS-11 PFT 4. James R. Rice Biological Technician GS-9 PFT 5. George Stapleton Biological Technician GS-6 PFT 6. VACANT Forestry Technician GS-6 7. James T. Cameron Outdoor Recreation Planner GS-11 PFT 8. Donna J. Stanley Outdoor Recreation Planner GS-7 PFT 9. Lonnie S. Priest Park Technician Supervisor GS-7 PFT 10. Joe DeJulio Park Technician GS-5 PFT 11. Sam Milazzo Park Technician GS-5 PFT 12. VACANT Park Technician GS-5 13. Layman Summers Fire Chief GS-7 PFT 14.
    [Show full text]