Hafizur Rahman Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801 Primary and Secondary e-mail: [email protected] Consequences of Rotator Cuff Eric Currier Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Injury on Joint Stabilizing University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801 Tissues in the Shoulder e-mail: [email protected] Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) are one of the primary causes of shoulder pain and dysfunction Marshall Johnson in the upper extremity accounting over 4.5 million physician visits per year with 250,000 Department of Mechanical Engineering, rotator cuff repairs being performed annually in the U.S. While the tear is often consid- Georgia Institute of Technology, ered an injury to a specific tendon/tendons and consequently treated as such, there are Atlanta, GA 30332 secondary effects of RCTs that may have significant consequences for shoulder function. e-mail: [email protected] Specifically, RCTs have been shown to affect the joint cartilage, bone, the ligaments, as well as the remaining intact tendons of the shoulder joint. Injuries associated with the Rick Goding upper extremities account for the largest percent of workplace injuries. Unfortunately, Department of Orthopaedic, the variable success rate related to RCTs motivates the need for a better understanding Joint Preservation Institute of Iowa, of the biomechanical consequences associated with the shoulder injuries. Understanding West Des Moines, IA 50266 the timing of the injury and the secondary anatomic consequences that are likely to have e-mail: [email protected] occurred are also of great importance in treatment planning because the approach to the treatment algorithm is influenced by the functional and anatomic state of the rotator cuff Amy Wagoner Johnson and the shoulder complex in general. In this review, we summarized the contribution of Department of Mechanical Science RCTs to joint stability in terms of both primary (injured tendon) and secondary (remain- and Engineering, ing tissues) consequences including anatomic changes in the tissues surrounding the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, affected tendon/tendons. The mechanical basis of normal shoulder joint function depends Urbana, IL 61801 on the balance between active muscle forces and passive stabilization from the joint e-mail: [email protected] surfaces, capsular ligaments, and labrum. Evaluating the role of all tissues working 1 together as a system for maintaining joint stability during function is important to under- Mariana E. Kersh stand the effects of RCT, specifically in the working population, and may provide insight Department of Mechanical Science into root causes of shoulder injury. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4037917] and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801 e-mail: [email protected]
1 Shoulder Function and Rotator Cuff Tears sports to occupational, and account for more work-related injuries (31%) than any other body region [4]. Among the shoulder inju- 1.1 The Shoulder Complex. The shoulder is among the most ries, rotator cuff tears (RCTs) warrant specific attention because mobile joints in the body allowing for significant range of motion of the high incidence among workers and the variable success rate in multiple planes. The shoulder complex is made of the scapula, of repairs. Rotator cuff problems account for over 4.5 million phy- clavicle, humerus, and the soft tissues that span the joint including sician visits per year [5], and rotator cuff repair is one of the most cartilage, capsular ligaments, the labrum, and surrounding common surgeries performed on the shoulder with 250,000 sur- muscle-tendon units (Fig. 1(a))[1,2]. The articulations in the geries performed annually in the U.S. [6,7]. Unfortunately, the shoulder complex include the glenohumeral joint, scapulothoracic success rate of rotator cuff repair is variable with many resulting articulation, and the acromioclavicular joint. These tissues work in retears. Revision surgeries can be as high as 30% for isolated in unison to complete a wide range of kinematic tasks. supraspinatus tendon tears [8]. Surprisingly, there is a dispropor- Often modeled as a ball-and-socket joint, the three shoulder tionately low amount of published research with regard to work- rotational degrees-of-freedom include flexion and extension, related injuries of the shoulder and rotator cuff tears (Fig. 2). This abduction and adduction, and internal and external rotation. paucity of data and the current revision rate suggests that the rela- Abduction and flexion account for the largest ranges of motion tionship between the injury mechanism, repair, and rehabilitation (170 6 10.8 deg and 164 6 10.2 deg, respectively) compared to with respect to rotator cuff tears is not well understood. extension (81 6 11.3 deg). The shoulder joint can rotate more A rotator cuff tear is described as a tear of one or more of the internally (86 6 4.6 deg) than externally (67 6 11.3 deg) [3]. rotator cuff tendons (supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis (Figs. 1(b) and 1(c))[2]) and is classified by the size 1.2 Rotator Cuff Tear and Treatment. Injuries to the upper of the tear. A full thickness tear indicates a through-thickness tear extremities can occur as a result of a wide range of activities from of the shoulder (Fig. 1(e)) while a partial thickness tear is described as the fraying of the tendon–bone connection (Fig. 1(f)) and can lead to a full tear if not treated properly [9–11]. RCTs 1Corresponding author. Manuscript received May 13, 2017; final manuscript received September 13, cause pain, depending on the severity of the tear, and can lead to 2017; published online September 29, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Kyle Allen. limited function in the affected shoulder, especially during
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering Copyright VC 2017 by ASME NOVEMBER 2017, Vol. 139 / 110801-1
Downloaded From: http://biomechanical.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 10/14/2017 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use Fig. 1 (a) Shoulder joint including bones, cartilage, and capsule, (b) posterior, and (c) anterior view of muscles that span the shoulder with rotator cuff muscles highlighted, (d) ligaments of the shoulder joint with coracoacromial, coracohumeral, and gle- nohumeral ligaments highlighted, (e) a full thickness tear in supraspinatus tendon, and (f) a partial thickness tear in supraspina- tus tendon [1,2]
overhead activities [11,12]. Other symptoms include, but are not effect on the balance of muscle forces at the shoulder joint [19] limited to weakness, tenderness, and snapping sounds coming and are the subject of Sec. 2 of this review. In Sec. 3, we com- from the joint [11]. Individuals with RCTs have also reported dif- pared longitudinal changes in the mechanical properties of the ficulty sleeping on the effected side [12]. In contrast, RCTs can bone–tendon interface as a result of RCT. Next in Sec. 4, we eval- also be asymptomatic with little to no clinical symptoms [13]. uated the secondary consequences of rotator cuff tears on the
1.3 More Than Muscle: Evaluating the Consequences of RCTs on the Shoulder Complex. Due to the asymptomatic nature of many RCTs, it is not possible to know how many tears go unreported; however, it has been suggested that symptomatic RCTs accounted for 34.7% of all tears and asymptomatic tears for 65.3% [14]. While the tear is often considered to be an injury to the tendons, and is consequently treated as such, there has been evidence in the literature that the RCTs may have significant effects on the remaining surrounding tissues. The mechanical basis of normal shoulder joint function depends on the balance between active muscle forces and passive stabilization from the joint surfaces, capsular ligaments, and labrum. Understanding the effect of rotator cuff tears on the mechanics of both the injured tendon and surrounding tissues is important for connecting and translating the results that arise from studies of in vivo shoulder kinematics, cadaveric studies using simulators, or in vivo muscle volume studies [15–18]. We suggest that an improved comprehen- sion of the mechanisms underlying shoulder function, before and Fig. 2 Number of articles found during the Pubmed search. after injury, can lead to improved diagnosis and treatment. For Pubmed search, we used the keywords as “A” and “B”, Therefore, we aimed to summarize the mechanical consequen- where “A” indicates either “Shoulder injury” or “RCT.” “B” indi- ces of rotator cuff tears on both the injured tendons and the sur- cates “Sports” or “Occupational” or “Work.” Graph shows that rounding tissues. Specifically, tears in the supraspinatus and there was higher number of papers published for “Sports” com- infraspinatus rotator cuff tendons have an immediate primary pared to work-related injuries.
110801-2 / Vol. 139, NOVEMBER 2017 Transactions of the ASME
Downloaded From: http://biomechanical.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 10/14/2017 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use mechanical properties of uninjured tendons, ligaments, and carti- bear. However, after 20 days of that detachment, modulus values lage. Finally, we identify opportunities for further study that may returned to pre-injury values. lead to provide better outcomes of rotator cuff surgeries. This trend was different when both supraspinatus and infraspi- natus were injured [21]. Interestingly, supraspinatus area increased (33%) after 56 days of detachment and remained higher 2 Primary Effects of Rotator Cuff Tears (26%) compared to the control at 112 days (Fig. 3(c))[21]. How- We define the primary effects of rotator cuff tears as changes in ever, the modulus of elasticity of the supraspinatus tendon did not the mechanical or structural properties of the torn tendon. Rotator change for any time period following for multitendon tears (Fig. cuff tears predominantly occur in the supraspinatus tendon [12]. 3(d)), in contrast to the results of the single tear. Therefore, the Using rodent models, the elastic modulus of the supraspinatus mechanical change in supraspinatus seems to be dependent on decreased by (72%) after 14 days of detachment, and was likely whether or not it alone is torn, or whether there are multiple ten- associated with the increased area (200%) observed at the same don tears present. time period (Figs. 3(a) and 3(b))[20]. The thickening of the While the supraspinatus tends to be the most common tendon remaining tendons after injury is the physiological adaptive torn, the infraspinatus was more sensitive to multitendon tears response of the remaining tendons to the increased load that they than supraspinatus. When both infraspinatus and supraspinatus
Fig. 3 Change in supraspinatus tendon (a) area and (b) modulus of elasticity over time fol- lowing its injury in rat (n 5 10 for each data point). Change in supraspinatus tendon (c) area and (d) modulus of elasticity over time following both supraspinatus and infraspinatus inju- ries (n 5 12 for each data point). Change in infraspinatus (e) area and (f) modulus of elasticity over time following both supraspinatus and infraspinatus injury (n 5 12 for each data point). The X-axis represents the time after injury. The Y-axis represents the properties. Closed and open symbols represent data for the control and injured tendons, respectively. * indicates statistically significant difference between control (uninjured) and injured tendon [20,21].
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering NOVEMBER 2017, Vol. 139 / 110801-3
Downloaded From: http://biomechanical.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 10/14/2017 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use were torn, the modulus of elasticity of the infraspinatus tendon influence of age on immediate repair of supraspinatus tendon in changed: modulus of elasticity decreased at 28 days and increased rats compared to control (uninjured) conditions [24]. For the older at 112 days, while stiffness increased only after 112 days (Figs. group (24 months of age), failure stress and peak failure load sig- 3(e) and 3(f))[21]. The rationale for why infraspinatus is more nificantly decreased in the immediately repaired tendon at both 14 sensitive to multitendon tears than supraspinatus is not clear and and 56 days after repair compared to the control. In contrast, for a remains a point for further investigation. younger group (8 months of age), failure stress and peak failure Experiments have also been conducted to investigate the effects load of the immediate repair group only decreased after 14 days of tendon repairs on tendon mechanical properties [6,22–24]. The of repair. Therefore, properties of the repaired tendon depend not supraspinatus tendon in rabbit was repaired immediately after only on the timing of the surgical repair but also on the age. Ear- detachment, but both stiffness and peak load decreased after 7 lier repair providing better mechanical properties may lower the days compared to the uninjured supraspinatus tendon (52% for risk of the tendon retear. Finally, results also showed that aging stiffness and 60% for peak load) [22]. Another study compared has a negative impact on the healing of the tendons. different repair time periods (1, 2, 3 months delay repair) with Other species like canine and ovine also showed the change in control (uninjured) in rabbits [23]. Results showed that if the tendon properties after tears [25,26]. Studies have investigated the injured supraspinatus tendon was repaired after 1 month of disrup- change in the properties of the infraspinatus muscle and tendon tion, stiffness increased (19%) relative to control. However, if after disruption [25,26]. The stiffness and modulus of elasticity repaired after 2 or 3 months of disruption, stiffness did not change significantly increased in detached infraspinatus muscle after 84 paradoxically suggesting that waiting to repair the tendon restores days of detachment compared to uninjured muscle in canine [25]. pre-injury stiffness levels. Similarly, the modulus of elasticity of the infraspinatus tendon Galatz et al. compared the effect of immediate and delayed increased after 42 days and 126 days of detachment compared to repair (repaired after 3 weeks of detachment) in rat supraspinatus the uninjured tendon in ovine (60% for 42 days, and 70% for 126 tendon [6]. Area increased (46%) for delayed repair compared to days) [26]. immediate repair when measured after 28 days of repair. Maxi- Different animal species including rat, rabbit, canine, and sheep mum stress decreased (80%) for the delayed repair group while have been used to evaluate the effects of RCTs. However, Chaud- measured after 10 days of repair. Plate et al. also investigated the hury et al. used human biopsy samples to measure the effects of
Fig. 4 Change in insertion: (a) stiffness, (b) area, and (c) modulus of elasticity over time after operation. The X- axis represents the time after injury and repair. Y-axis represents the properties. Each unique symbol denotes a different study. All studies have been done using rodents and n indicates the number of the rodents used in differ- ent cases. Closed symbols represent the control data for each study. Studies 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 represent Refs. [35], [32], [37], [34], and [36], respectively.
110801-4 / Vol. 139, NOVEMBER 2017 Transactions of the ASME
Downloaded From: http://biomechanical.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 10/14/2017 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use RCTs [27]. The storage modulus, calculated by dynamic shear tendons to injured and repaired supraspinatus tendons. The analysis, showed that the torn tendons had significantly lower repaired tendons were tested after several weeks to observe the modulus (20%) compared to normal tendons. effect of time on the healing of the insertion site. Studies also con- In summary, the increment or decrement of properties of the sidered the effect of different activity levels on the healing process injured tendons and muscles depends not only on the number of [32,34–37]. While the measured properties varied with time and tears but also on the time period after injury. Even after repair, the occasionally among activity levels, most properties changed from tendons may experience changes in properties compared to con- their corresponding control values (Fig. 4)[32,34–37]. It is impor- trol. These changes in tendon properties can further affect the bal- tant to note that the control measurements of Manning et al. [37] ance between muscle forces and passive stabilization and can lead differ from the control measurements of Thomopoulos et al. [34] to shoulder joint instability and abnormal joint kinematics. and Gimbel et al. [35] even though test methods were similar. The studies showed that the quality of the healing tissue differs for the 3 Effects of Rotator Cuff Tears on Tendon-Bone normal insertion site even after an extended test period. This is consistent with other studies that show that the normal four-zone Interface insertion site does not reform once damaged [6,28,34,38–49]. All The tendon to bone insertion site consists of functionally graded insertion studies that are reviewed in this paper used rat shoulders tissue whose function is to transfer load between the hard bone as test specimens. While rat shoulders have anatomy and repair and soft tendon. Without this transitional area, high stress concen- procedures comparable to the human shoulder, the conclusions trations would form at the interface of these two materials, leading made in these studies cannot be directly applied to the humans to an increased potential for failure [28–31]. The insertion site is [34,50]. Another limitation of these studies is that the supraspina- divided into four zones: tendon, fibrocartilage, mineralized fibro- tus tendons were “detached” or “transected” and not torn by an cartilage, and bone [32]. Each zone contributes to the overall gra- acute traumatic or chronic degenerative process. These tendons dient in cell phenotype, tissue organization, tissue composition, were completely separated from the humeral head while many and tissue mechanical properties [33]. human patients experience only partial tears. The studies on mechanical properties of insertion site that are These studies of the insertion site measured apparent properties reviewed in this paper compared normal, healthy supraspinatus and do not account for changes in properties along the tendon to
Fig. 5 Change in (a) infraspinatus and subscapularis properties due to supraspinatus tendon detachment (b) subscapularis properties after supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons detach- ment, and (c) infraspinatus properties and supraspinatus and subscapularis tendons detach- ment. Properties are expressed as the percent change after the detachment compared to control (uninjured). 4 wks and 8 wks indicate properties measured at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after injury. The squiggly lines near the tendon insertion site represent tendon detachment. Proper- ties above and below the solid lines indicate percent increase and percent decrease from con- trol, respectively. “nsd” indicates no significant differences from control for that property [51].
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering NOVEMBER 2017, Vol. 139 / 110801-5
Downloaded From: http://biomechanical.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 10/14/2017 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use bone insertion site. The insertion site was categorized as bone or that the elastic modulus decreased in the midsubstance of the tendon compartments, and only viscoelastic measurements of the lower subscapularis and upper subscapularis, and insertion site of intact insertion site were considered [28]. While the current stud- lower subscapularis for overuse activity group [53]. Also, elastic ies focus on the properties of the insertion site after repair, no modulus increased in the insertion site of upper subscapularis. studies have tested the damaged insertion site. Due to insufficient However, area did not change for any region of these tendons. In knowledge about the natural healing process of the insertion site, contrast, for a single tear, no changes were observed for both little can be done to regenerate the normal tissue [32]. Therefore, modulus and area as mentioned earlier. Therefore, elastic moduli it is necessary to investigate the development of the normal four- are affected by overuse activity if the infraspinatus and supraspi- zone insertion site. natus are both detached. Comparisons were also performed between single tear (supra- spinatus) and multitendon tears (supraspinatus and infraspinatus) 4 Secondary Effects of Rotator Cuff Tears to measure the contributions of the additional tear compared to The stability of the glenohumeral joint depends on the balance the single tear [54]. No area changes were observed for lower sub- between static and dynamic structures including the glenoid artic- scapularis and upper subscapularis for multitendon tears com- ular cartilage, glenoid labrum, ligaments, joint capsule, osseous pared to single tendon tear. Elastic modulus decreased for the structures, rotator cuff muscles, and other muscle structures sur- midsubstance region of the lower subscapularis and upper subsca- rounding the shoulder joint. In healthy shoulders, these structures pularis. However, the modulus increased for the insertion region allow for concentric rotation of the humeral head on the glenoid only in the upper subscapularis [54]. surface. However, the loss of muscle force due to RCTs likely leads to glenohumeral joint instability, and the articular surfaces 4.1.3 Multitendon Tear: Supraspinatus and Subscapularis. are exposed to abnormal joint mechanics. Therefore, in addition The structural and mechanical properties in the infraspinatus to the primary injured tendon, RCTs also have secondary effects changed due to tears in the supraspinatus and the subscapularis on the remaining intact tendons, cartilage, and ligaments of the (Fig. 5(c))[51]. For the infraspinatus tendon, the area increased shoulder. after 4 weeks and 8 weeks in a similar fashion as single tear. (For 4 weeks, 11% in double tear compared to 16% in single tear; for 8 weeks, 35% in double tear compared to 37% in single tear). Mod- 4.1 Intact Rotator Cuff Tendons. Due to the dependence ulus decreased and percent relaxation increased after 8 weeks of between glenohumeral joint structures, tears in any of rotator cuff detachment (for modulus, 22% in double tear relative to 26% in tendons will eventually affect the properties of other surrounding single tear; for percent relaxation, 14% for double tear relative to intact rotator cuff tendons. Several studies have shown that the 13% in single tear). Stiffness, peak load and equilibrium load mechanical properties of the infraspinatus and subscapularis ten- were not affected by multitendon tears, as was also reported for dons change due to tears in surrounding rotator cuff tendons. single tear. It is interesting that the degree to which these proper- Properties of the intact rotator cuff tendons were measured for ties are altered for multitendon tears are similar to single tear, and both control (uninjured, i.e., no tears in surrounding rotator cuff suggests that detachment of subscapularis in addition to supraspi- tendons) and injured tendons (at least one of surrounding rotator natus would not further change the infraspinatus properties. In cuff tendons is torn). We calculated the percent change of intact summary, the area of the intact tendons increased and modulus tendon properties after tearing in surrounding tendons relative to decreased after tears in surrounding tendons. the control condition and summarized these findings graphically in Fig. 5. 4.1.4 Comparison Between Single Tear and Multitendon Tears. While comparing between single tear and multitears, the 4.1.1 Single Tear of Supraspinatus. Detachment of the supra- area increased and modulus of elasticity decreased for infraspina- spinatus tendon caused changes in both structural and mechanical tus and subscapularis irrespective of the number of the tears. properties of the infraspinatus and subscapularis tendons (Fig. However, the degree to which these properties would change 5(a))[51]. The area of infraspinatus and subscapularis tendons depends on the number of the tears. For example, changes in prop- increased after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of detachment. However, the erties in subscapularis were more for multitears compared to sin- elastic modulus decreased and the percent relaxation increased gle tear. In contrast, the change in properties was identical for only after 8 weeks of detachment. No changes were observed for single tear and multitears in infraspinatus. Furthermore, different peak load and equilibrium load [51]. degrees of loadings have significant contributions on how these Experiments have been performed to compare between normal properties are changed. cage activity and overuse activity of rats due to supraspinatus tear. After supraspinatus tendon detachment, area and modulus did not change for the infraspinatus and subscapularis [52]. Although 4.2 Cartilage. The effect of supraspinatus and infraspinatus supraspinatus is the most frequent torn tendon among rotator tears on cartilage thickness and elastic modulus has been eval- cuffs, there are only two studies that measured the biomechanical uated using rat models. Glenoid cartilage thickness decreased in effects of supraspinatus torn tendons on surrounding intact rotator the antero-inferior region after the detachment of the supraspina- cuff tendons [51,52]. tus and the infraspinatus tendons while the elastic modulus decreased over a larger region of the glenoid (Fig. 6)[55]. Reuther 4.1.2 Multitendon Tear: Supraspinatus and Infraspinatus. et al. reported that after 8 weeks of supraspinatus tendon detach- Multitendon tears in both supraspinatus and infraspinatus also ment, within the overuse activity rat group, the equilibrium modu- affected the properties of subscapularis (Fig. 5(b))[51], but to dif- lus increased significantly in antero-inferior and superior regions ferent degrees compared to the single-tendon tear. The initial (4 of glenoid cartilage compared to normal cage activity group [52]. week) increase in area of the subscapularis was nearly twice as But no change in thickness was observed in any regions. How- high in the presence of both supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears ever, for detachment of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons compared to a supraspinatus tear only. By 8 weeks, the change together, the cartilage modulus decreased in the center and was less profound (68% in double tear compared to 50% in single posterior–superior regions in the overuse activity group [53]. tear). The modulus decrease in the double tear was nearly identi- The detachment of the biceps tendon in addition to multitendon cal to the single tear scenario. Stiffness only decreased after 8 tears (supraspinatus and infraspinatus) also reduced glenoid carti- weeks and no changes were seen for percent relaxation, peak load, lage thickness in the anterior–inferior region, with no change in and equilibrium load [51]. elastic modulus [56]. However, the elastic modulus decreased in Comparing between normal cage and overuse activity in rats the center of the glenoid for multitendon tears (supraspinatus and with multitendon tears (supraspinatus and infraspinatus) showed infraspinatus) compared to supraspinatus tendon tear [54]. Current
110801-6 / Vol. 139, NOVEMBER 2017 Transactions of the ASME
Downloaded From: http://biomechanical.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 10/14/2017 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use Table 1 Changes in ligament properties after RCT [63,64]
Age (years)
Ligament Measured property <60 61–87 >60
Length 17.68% Ø 21.43% Coracoacromial (medial band) Area, width, thickness Ø Ø Ø
Length 14.91% 21.76% 16.41% Area Ø þ50% þ36.67% Width, Thickness, Stiffness Ø Ø Ø Coracoacromial (lateral band) Failure Load and Displacement, Ø Ø Ø Total Failure Strain Ø Ø Ø Failure stress Ø 46.06% 32.06% Ligamentous failure strain — Ø — Total modulus — 58.74% — Ligamentous modulus — 43.94% —