DOCSLIB.ORG

Conference Abstracts & Short Biographies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conference Abstracts & Short Biographies Mishpat Ivri: Past, Present and Future 100 Year Anniversary of the Establishment of the “Mishpat Ivri Society” in Moscow Jewish Law Association 20th International Conference Moscow State University, Law School, Moscow 23 - 26 July 2018 Conference Abstracts & Short Biographies 1 Table of Contents Konstantin Andreev ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Daphne Barak-Erez ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Michael Baris ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Hila Ben-Eliyahu ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Hanina Ben Menahem ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Itzhak Brand ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Yehuda Brandes ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Benjamin Brown ............................................................................................................................................... 12 Iris Brown ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Michael J. Broyde ............................................................................................................................................. 15 Levi Cooper ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 Jordanna Cope-Yossef ...................................................................................................................................... 18 Gayane Davidyan ............................................................................................................................................. 19 Olga A. Dyuzheva ............................................................................................................................................. 19 Arye Edrei ......................................................................................................................................................... 20 David J. Fine ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 Shlomo E. Gliksberg ......................................................................................................................................... 22 Yaacov Habba ................................................................................................................................................... 24 Amos Israel-Vleeschhouwer ............................................................................................................................ 25 Evgeniya Kalinina & Vera Romanovskaya ........................................................................................................ 28 Anton Mordechai Kanevskiy ............................................................................................................................ 30 Malka Katz ........................................................................................................................................................ 31 Menachem Katz ............................................................................................................................................... 32 Nir Kedar .......................................................................................................................................................... 35 Menachem (Mario) Klein ................................................................................................................................. 37 Ron S. Kleinman ............................................................................................................................................... 40 Gideon Libson .................................................................................................................................................. 42 Shahar Lifshitz .................................................................................................................................................. 43 Assaf Likhovski ................................................................................................................................................. 45 Itay Lipschutz ................................................................................................................................................... 46 Yair Lorberbaum .............................................................................................................................................. 48 Leib Moscovitz ................................................................................................................................................. 49 2 Denis Primakov ................................................................................................................................................ 51 Amihai Radzyner .............................................................................................................................................. 53 Avinoam Rosenak ............................................................................................................................................. 54 Mordecai Sabato .............................................................................................................................................. 56 Haim Shapira .................................................................................................................................................... 57 Yaacov Shapira ................................................................................................................................................. 58 Benjamin Shmueli ............................................................................................................................................ 60 Yuval Sinai ........................................................................................................................................................ 62 Ari Marcelo Solon ............................................................................................................................................. 63 Zvi Stampfer ..................................................................................................................................................... 64 Suzanne Stone .................................................................................................................................................. 65 Alim Ulbashev .................................................................................................................................................. 66 Lilac Torgeman ................................................................................................................................................. 67 Yaron Unger ..................................................................................................................................................... 68 Stephan Wendehorst ....................................................................................................................................... 70 Steven Wilf ....................................................................................................................................................... 71 Shai Wozner ..................................................................................................................................................... 72 Michael Wygoda .............................................................................................................................................. 74 Motti Zalkin ...................................................................................................................................................... 75 3 Konstantin Andreev Limitations on Jewish Religious Practices in Modern Russia Jurisprudence In the summer of the year of 2016 in the Russian Parliament the so-called «Yarovaya Law» was adopted due to which in the Profile Law on Religion the definition of missionary activity emerged. Law enforcement practice has taken the path in which any religious activity started to be regarded as missionary activity. Any person doing «something religious» in the presence of a third party commits missionary activity, according to the opinion of a law enforcement agent, and, therefore, if not being authorized for this activity, is regarded as a law violator. As it is known, Judaism is not considered as a missionary religion. However, according to the Yarovaya Law it becomes as such, because any religious activity, committed in the presence of either of a non-observant Jew or not even a Jew can be regarded as missionary activity. On the one hand, Judaism is recognized in Russia as a traditional
Load more

Recommended publications
  • It Is Fitting That We Come Together Today, on the Day the Members Of
    I would like to begin by thanking David Berger and the other Keshet organizers for allowing me to submit a paper to be read to you in my absence. I am, regrettably, unable to be in New York today, but am grateful for the honor of having been asked to participate in this way, nevertheless. My talk is entitled: Svara, Queers, and the Future of Rabbinic Judaism According to Masechet Sanhedrin [5a], there are two requirements for one who wants to exercise rabbinic authority—one must be both gamirna and savirna. Now, what do these Aramaic terms mean? Gamirna implies that one has to have amassed sufficient knowledge or learning. Basically, they gotta know their stuff. And savirna implies they have to have the ability to exercise svara. But what is this svara that is so crucial to functioning as a rabbi and to interpreting God’s will? It seems pretty straightforward: svara, the ability to be “savir,” “reasonable.” The capacity to reason. But, actually, svara is much more complicated, and, it turns out, is not only a prerequisite for those aspiring to rabbinic authority, but is probably the most significant source of Jewish law we have. After the destruction of the Second Temple, our founding Rabbis increased the number of places to which they could turn to discover God’s will—that is, the sources of Jewish Law—from one to five. In addition to our old standby—a verse in the Torah, which they called kra (and which legal scholars call midrash)—they added ma’aseh (precedent), minhag (custom), takkanah (legislation) and last but not least, svara.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventing Judicial Review: Israel and America
    INAUGUARL URI AND CAROLINE BAUER MEMORIAL LECTURE INVENTING JUDICIAL REVIEW: ISRAEL AND AMERICA Robert A. Burt* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE FIRST GENERATION: TOWARD AN INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY .............................................. 2017 A. The Impact of the 1967 War on Israeli Jurisprudence .................................................... 2027 1. Jurisdiction over the Occupied Territories ....... 2029 2. The Knesset Acts ............................... 2034 B. The Court's Initial Response ......................... 2036 1. Shalit v. Minister of the Interior ................. 2036 2. Bergman v. Minister of Finance .................. 2043 3. Bergman and Marbury .......................... 2047 4. Jurisdiction over the Territories and Marbury .... 2049 II. THE SECOND GENERATION: THE AMERICAN WAY ...... 2051 A. The Definitive Emergence of Judicial Review in A m erica ............................................ 2051 B. The Israeli Supreme Court Charts Its Path ........... 2066 1. Israel's Dred Scott ............................... 2067 2. Judicial Injunctions to Tolerate the Intolerant ... 2077 3. The Promise and Problems of Judicial Independence ................................... 2084 C. The Convergence of Israeli and American Doctrine ... 2091 * Southmayd Professor of Law, Yale University. This Article is an expanded version of the Inaugural Uri and Caroline Bauer Memorial Lecture delivered at the Benjamin N. Car- dozo School of Law of Yeshiva University on October 11, 1988. I am especially indebted to Justice Aharon Barak, Professor Kenneth Mann of the Tel Aviv University Faculty of Law, and Dean Stephen Goldstein of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law. Although none of them is responsible for the substance of this Article, without their generous assistance it would not have been written. I am also particularly grateful to two Yale Law School students, Stephen Sowle who helped me with the American historical sources and Joel Prager who gave me access to material only available in Hebrew.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Democracy – Fighting for the Ground Rules
    PROJECT DEMOCRACY – FIGHTING FOR THE GROUND RULES CHAPTER 3: GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS The danger to democracy in Israel is multi-faceted. Particularly worrisome, two of the central arenas from which these threats arise are the very ones charged with safeguarding democracy: The Knesset (Israeli parliament) and the government. Over the past two years, senior officials have voiced harsh and unprecedented statements directed against human rights organizations, political groups, and minorities, and have made various attempts to narrow their operations. At the same time, a long list of new legislative proposals have been introduced in the Knesset, some of which have been enacted, which clearly harm Israeli democracy and undermine the rights, the status, and the opinions of those who are not part of the current political majority or whom the majority wishes to shy away from. It is important to emphasize that these legislative initiatives are not only private proposals introduced by individual MKs, but bills that have, in some cases, received the support of the government and in other cases have even been introduced by the government itself. Additionally, recent years have seen the continued erosion of checks and balances between branches of government, a basic democratic principle that is vital for the survival of any democracy . There have been serious defects in the legislative process, and legislation has been introduced that would strengthen the powers of the government and weaken those of the opposition, which represents Israel's minority voices. Another dangerous phenomenon is the continued undermining of the status of the judiciary branch. This manifests itself in the government's refusal to comply with court rulings made against it, and in legislative attempts to weaken the power of the Supreme Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Yehiel Kaplan CURRICULUM VITAE 1. Personal Details Permanent Home Address: 30/9 Shivtey Israel St., Modiin, 71724 Home Telephone Number: 077-3203979 Office Telephone Number: 04-8249219 Electronic Address: [email protected] Fax Number: 04-8240681 2. Higher Education Period of Study Name of Institution and Degree Date of Degree Department A. Undergraduate and Graduate Studies 1974-1978 Hesder Yeshiva, Har-Etzion, Alon Rabbinical Ordination, 1978 Shevut, Gush Etzion Conferred by Rabbis Eliezer Yehudah Waldenberg, Zalman Nechemia Goldberg and Yehuda Gershuni 1979-1983 Faculty of Law, The Hebrew L.L.B. 1983 University of Jerusalem 1984-1985 Faculty of Law, The Hebrew L.L.M. 1985 University of Jerusalem Thesis Under Direction of Prof. Menachem Elon: “Public in the Legislation of Jewish Medieval Franco- German Communities”. 1987-1988 Visiting Scholar. Focus of Studies: Not Applicable 1988 Medieval Roman and Canon Law, Law School, the University of California, Berkeley 1986-1993 Faculty of Law, The Hebrew Dr. Jur. Thesis Under 1994 University of Jerusalem Direction of Prof. Menachem Elon: “Jewish Public Law of Franco-German Jewry from the Xth through the XVth Century B. Post-Doctoral Studies March- University of Oxford, Centre for Not Applicable August 1996 August 1996 Socio-Legal Studies, Post Dr. research - Family Law. 3. Academic Rank and Tenure 1 Name of Institution and Academic Rank and Tenure Department Faculty of Law, University of Associate Professor With Tenure Haifa 4. Offices of Academic Administration 1. Discipline Committee, University of Haifa, 1997, 1998. 2. Teaching Committee, Faculty of Law, University of Haifa, 1996-Present. 3. Library Committee, Faculty of Law, University of Haifa, 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish and Western Philosophies of Law
    Jewish and Western Philosophies of Law 1) Reason, Revelation, and Natural Law Maimonides, Mishne Torah, Laws of Kings, Chapter 10. Maimonides, Commentary, Ethics of the Fathers. Aquinas, Summa Theologica, selections. Marvin Fox, “Maimonides and Aquinas on Natural Law.” Yisrael LIfshits, Tifferet Yisrael, Avot Chapter 3 2) Natural Law and Noahide Law Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 57a, 57b. Jason Rosenblatt, Renaissance England’s Chief Rabbi: John Selden, selections. J. David Bleich, “Judaism and Natural Law.” Michael P. Levine, “The Role of Reason in the Ethics of Maimonides: Or Why Maimonides Could have had a Doctrine of Natural Law even if He Did Not,” The Journal of Religious Ethics, 14:2. 3) Modern Versions of Natural Law Theory John Finnis, Natural Law and Natural Rights, chs. II, V-XII. Robert P. George, In Defense of Natural Law, Selections. David Novak, Natural Law in Judaism, selections Russell Hittinger, The First Grace: Rediscovering the Natural Law in a Post Christian World,” selections. 4) Law and Divine Command Theory Maimonides, Book of Commandments, Principle 1. Robert Adams, Finite and Infinite Goods, selections. Robert Adams, The Virtue of Faith, selections. Comments of Nahmanides on Maimonides’ Book of Commandments, Principle 1. Rabbi Elchanan Wasserman, Kuntres Divrei Sofrim. 5) The Nature of Law: Hart vs. Dworkin H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law, chs. I-V Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, chs. 2-4 6) Hart vs. Dworkin Halakhically Apllied Nissim of Gerondi, Derashot HaRan, Mishpat HaMelekh Menachem Loberbaum, Politics and the Limits of Law (Stanford: 2001). Isaac Halevi Herzog, 7) Law, Justice and Equity, Part I A.
    [Show full text]
  • The 20Th Knesset Report on Racist, Discriminatory, and Occupation- and Annexation-Supportive Laws and Bills
    The 20th Knesset Report on Racist, Discriminatory, and Occupation- and Annexation-Supportive Laws and Bills Summer Session 2015 – Summer Session 2018 Third Report By Barhoum Jaraysi Palestinian Forum for Israeli Studies (MADAR), Ramallah, in cooperation with the Negotiations Affairs Department, Palestine Liberation Organisation Summary 2015–2018 Over the three years of its parliamentary session, the Knesset enacted a total of 185 racist laws in support of the occupation and settlement activity. A total of 32 bills were approved in the final reading. These included 26 separate laws. Six bills were included as provisions under four of the 26 approved laws. In the third parliamentary year (May 2017–March 2018): 1. The Knesset approved six bills in the final reading. Another two bills were included as provisions under a law. Approved bills provide for tightening restrictions on Palestinian movement and access across the 1967 occupied territory and enforcing the Israeli law to the occupied West Bank. 2. Two bills were approved in the first reading. Of these, a bill provides for imposing restrictions on anti-occupation human rights organisations. Representatives of these organisations may not visit school students. 3. Seven bills were approved in the preliminary reading. These advocate for discrimination and restriction of political activity. The most dangerous of these is the Nation-State Law. 4. During the reporting period, members of Knesset (MKs) proposed 38 bills. The majority of these prescribe penalties against Palestinians of the West Bank and Jerusalem, place restrictions on political activity, and consolidate discrimination. Since Donald Trump was elected as the US President, the Knesset has initiated a process to provide final approval and make laws, with the purpose of direct and indirect annexation.
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Identity in the Jewish State and the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2018 Shifting Priorities? Civic Identity in the Jewish State and the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism Mohamad Batal Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Batal, Mohamad, "Shifting Priorities? Civic Identity in the Jewish State and the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism" (2018). CMC Senior Theses. 1826. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1826 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College Shifting Priorities? Civic Identity in the Jewish State and the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism Submitted To Professor George Thomas by Mohamad Batal for Senior Thesis Spring 2018 April 23, 2018 ii iii iv Abstract: This thesis begins with an explanation of Israel’s foundational constitutional tension—namely, that its identity as a Jewish State often conflicts with liberal- democratic principles to which it is also committed. From here, I attempt to sketch the evolution of the state’s constitutional principles, pointing to Chief Justice Barak’s “constitutional revolution” as a critical juncture where the aforementioned theoretical tension manifested in practice, resulting in what I call illiberal or undemocratic “moments.” More profoundly, by introducing Israel’s constitutional tension into the public sphere, the Barak Court’s jurisprudence forced all of the Israeli polity to confront it. My next chapter utilizes the framework of a bill currently making its way through the Knesset—Basic Law: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People—in order to draw out the past and future of Israeli civic identity.
    [Show full text]
  • La 20 E Knesset Registre De Lois Racistes Soutenant L'occupation Et
    احملتوايت الفصل اﻷول ................................................................................. 3 موجة غري مسبوقة من التشريعات العنصرية والداعمة لﻻحتﻻل واﻻستيطان ...................... 3 الفصل الثاين ................................................................................. 6 I ـ قوانني عنصرية ومتييزية .................................................................... 6 II ـ قوانني لتقييد عمل السياسيني العرب ...................................................... 10 III ـ قوانني لتجرمي مقاومة اﻻحتﻻل ........................................................... 12 IV ـ قوانني هتدف إىل تعزيز اﻻحتﻻل واﻻستيطان .............................................. 19 الفصل الثالث ................................................................................ 22 أداء املعارضة ................................................................................. 22 ملحق )1(: 25 قائمة كاملة للقوانني العنصرية والداعمة لﻻستيطان واﻻحتﻻل اليت متت معاجلتها خﻻل الدورة العشرين للكنيست. ملحق )2( مقارنة مع الوﻻايت الربملانية اﻷخرية ................................................. 42 2 الفصل اﻷول موجة غري مسبوقة من التشريعات العنصرية والداعمة لﻻحتﻻل واﻻستيطان شهدت الدورة العشرون للكنيست اﻹسرائيلي واليت امتدت ما بني 7 أاير 2015 وحىت 1 كانون الثاين 2019 موجة غري مسبوقة من التشريعات العنصرية والداعمة لﻻحتﻻل واﻻستيطان. فقد عاجل الكنيست العشرون 221 قانون ا ضمن هذا اﻹطار، من بينها 35 قانون ا أقرت ابلقراءة النهائية، إضافة إىل 6 قوانني استدجمت يف هذه القوانني، ما يعين عمليا ا أنه مت سن 41 قانون ا. كما بقي على جدول أعمال الكنيست قانونن يف مرحلة القراءة اﻷوىل،
    [Show full text]
  • "The Liberal Agenda": Biblical Values and the First Amendment
    Touro Law Review Volume 14 Number 1 Article 6 1997 "The Liberal Agenda": Biblical Values and the First Amendment Burton Caine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Caine, Burton (1997) ""The Liberal Agenda": Biblical Values and the First Amendment," Touro Law Review: Vol. 14 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol14/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Touro Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Caine: The Liberal Agenda "The Liberal Agenda": Biblical Values and the First Amendment Burton Caine' At a recent conference of the National Jewish Law Students Association, a student expressed surprise and appreciation that one advocating the "liberal" point of view could quote the Bible in support of that position. The implication was that "real" or "knowledgeable" Jews - often mentioned interchangeably with "Orthodox," "pious," or even "observant" Jews, are all on the right. Without even defining terms, the assumption is that these American Jews, motivated by religion and Zionism, support and become the "settlers" on the West Bank (often referred to in their Biblical nomenclature as "Judah and Samaria"), advocate government aid to Jewish religious schools and practices in the United States, and are the only real stalwarts for Jewish life at home and abroad.2 The stereotype then I Professor of Law, Temple Law School; Harvard Law School, J.D., 1952; Director, Temple-Tel Aviv Universities Law Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Jewish Law in American Law Schools–Part II: an Annotated Syllabus
    © The Journal of International and Comparative Law at Chicago-Kent: Volume 2, 2002 1 Teaching Jewish Law in American Law Schools–Part II: An Annotated Syllabus Samuel J. Levine* INTRODUCTION In recent years, American legal scholarship has increasingly turned to the Jewish legal system as a source of comparison and contrast for questions that arise in American legal discourse.1 Concomitantly, a growing number of American law schools have introduced into their curriculum a course in Jewish Law. By some estimates, approximately thirty American law schools include courses in Jewish Law as part of their curriculum. 2 A number of different models * Research Professor of Law, St. John’s University School of Law; LL.M., Columbia University; J.D., Fordham University; Ordination, Yeshiva University; B.A., Yeshiva University. The syllabus presented here is a variation of the syllabi I have used in the Jewish Law courses I have taught at St. John’s University School of Law and Fordham University School of Law. I gratefully acknowledge that in compiling these syllabi, I gained from the advice and assistance of friends, colleague, and mentors, many of whom shared with me the syllabi they had used in teaching Jewish Law. In addition, I thank Abraham Abramovsky, with whom I taught the course at Fordham. I also note the recent appearance of a Jewish Law textbook for use in American law schools. See M ENACHEM ELON ET AL., JEWISH LAW (MISHPATIVRI): CASES AND M ATERIALS (1999). Although Professor Elon’s book represents a groundbreaking achievement and is a valuable source for any course in Jewish Law taught in an American law school, the book differs from my own syllabus in its emphasis on Jewish law in the context of modern Israeli law, an approach more consistent with the international law model that I incorporate into my syllabus to a considerably more limited degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Mount Faithful
    Catholic University Law Review Volume 45 Issue 3 Spring 1996 Article 17 1996 Temple Mount Faithful – General, Inspector-General of the Police, Mayor of Jerusalem, Minister of Education and Culture, Director of the Antiquities Division, Muslim WAQF - In the Supreme Court Sitting as the High Court of Justice [September 23, 1993] Menachem Elon Aharon Barak Gavriel Bach Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Menachem Elon, Aharon Barak & Gavriel Bach, Temple Mount Faithful – General, Inspector-General of the Police, Mayor of Jerusalem, Minister of Education and Culture, Director of the Antiquities Division, Muslim WAQF - In the Supreme Court Sitting as the High Court of Justice [September 23, 1993], 45 Cath. U. L. Rev. 861 (1996). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol45/iss3/17 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TEMPLE MOUNT FAITHFUL-AMUTAH ET AL. v. ATTORNEY-GENERAL INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF THE POLICE MAYOR OF JERUSALEM MINISTER OF EDUCATION AND CULTURE DIRECTOR OF THE ANTIQUITIES DIVISION MUSLIM WAQF In the Supreme Court Sitting as the High Court of Justice [September 23, 1993] M. Elon D.P., A. Barak J., and G. Bach J. CONTENTS I. FOREWORD BY KiTry 0. COHEN .............................. 862 II. A NOTE ON THE TRANSLATION ................................ 862 III. MENACHEM ELON: A BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ................. 863 IV. INTRODUCTION BY MENACHEM ELON .......................... 864 V . THE PARTIES .................................................
    [Show full text]