DOCSLIB.ORG

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Meredith Specific Plan Area Ontario, California Prepared for: SRG Acquisition, LLC 18802 Bardeen Avenue Irvine, California 92612 Prepared by: Ardent Environmental Group, Inc. 1827 Capital Street, Suite 103 Corona, California 92882 July 23, 2014 Project No. 100507001 July 23, 2014 Project No. 100507001 Mr. Patrick Russell SRG Acquisition, LLC 18802 Bardeen Avenue Irvine, California 92612 Subject: Phase I Environmental Site Area Meredith Specific Plan Property Ontario, California Dear Mr. Russell: Ardent Environmental Group, Inc. (Ardent) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site As- sessment (ESA) of the above-referenced property (site). Work was completed in general accordance with the contract dated March 5, 2014 between SRG Acquisition, LLC and Ardent. The attached report presents our methodology, findings, opinions, and conclusions regarding the environmental conditions at the site. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If there are any questions, please feel free to call the undersigned at your con- venience. Sincerely, Ardent Environmental Group, Inc. Kevin Tomita Paul A. Roberts, P.G. Staff Environmental Geologist Principal Geologist KT/PAR/paw Distribution: (1) Addressee (electronic copy) Meredith Specific Plan Area July 23, 2014 Ontario, California Project No. 100507001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................1 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................4 1.1 Purpose of Phase I ESA ....................................................................................................4 1.2 Involved Parties .................................................................................................................5 1.3 Scope of Work ...................................................................................................................5 1.4 Limitations and Exceptions ................................................................................................6 1.5 Special Terms and Conditions ...........................................................................................7 1.6 User Reliance ....................................................................................................................8 1.7 Physical Limitations ...........................................................................................................8 1.8 Data Gaps .........................................................................................................................8 2 GENERAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS ......................................................................................8 2.1 Location and Legal Description .........................................................................................8 2.2 Site Description and Current Site Uses/Operations ........................................................... 9 2.2.1 Site Description ................................................................................................. 9 2.2.2 Occupants .........................................................................................................9 2.2.3 Heating and Cooling Systems ...........................................................................10 2.2.4 Sewage Disposal/Septic Systems .....................................................................10 2.2.5 Potable Water ...................................................................................................10 2.3 Adjacent Properties ...........................................................................................................10 3 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ...........................................................................................11 3.1 Current Title Information ....................................................................................................11 3.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations ..........................................................11 3.3 Specialized Knowledge .....................................................................................................12 3.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information ............................................. 12 3.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ................................................................... 12 3.6 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA .................................................................................12 3.7 Other User Provided Information .......................................................................................12 4 PHYSICAL SETTING ................................................................................................................12 4.1 Site Topography ................................................................................................................13 4.2 Geology ..........................................................................................................................13 4.3 Oil and Gas Maps ..............................................................................................................13 4.4 Site Hydrology ...................................................................................................................13 4.4.1 Surface Waters ................................................................................................. 13 4.4.2 Groundwater .....................................................................................................14 5 HISTORICAL LAND USE ..........................................................................................................14 5.1 Summary of Historical Land Use of the Property ...............................................................14 5.2 Summary of Historical Land Use of Adjoining Properties ................................................... 15 5.3 Fire Insurance Rate Maps ................................................................................................. 15 5.4 Historical Aerial Photographs ............................................................................................ 15 5.5 Building Department ..........................................................................................................16 100507001R Phase I ESA i Meredith Specific Plan Area July 23, 2014 Ontario, California Project No. 100507001 5.6 City Directories ..................................................................................................................16 5.7 Historical Topographic Maps .............................................................................................17 5.8 Interviews ..........................................................................................................................18 5.8.1 Interview with Owner .........................................................................................18 5.8.2 Interview with Site Manager ..............................................................................18 5.8.3 Interviews with Occupant ...................................................................................18 5.8.4 Interviews with Local Government Officials ....................................................... 18 5.8.5 Interviews with Others .......................................................................................18 5.9 Previous Reports and Documents .....................................................................................18 6 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ........................................................................................................19 6.1 Use and Storage of Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products ............................... 19 6.2 Storage and Disposal of Hazardous Wastes......................................................................19 6.3 Unidentified Substance Containers ....................................................................................19 6.4 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) and Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) ................. 19 6.5 Evidence of Releases ........................................................................................................19 6.6 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) .....................................................................................20 6.7 Suspect Asbestos-Containing Building Materials (ACMs) .................................................. 20 6.8 Lead Based Paint (LBP) ....................................................................................................20 6.9 Indications of Water Damage or Mold Growth ................................................................... 20 6.10 Wastewater Systems .........................................................................................................21 6.11 Stormwater Systems .........................................................................................................21 6.12 Wells ..........................................................................................................................21 6.13 Other Subsurface Structures .............................................................................................21 6.14 Other Issues ......................................................................................................................21 7 ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE SEARCH ................................................................................21
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Po5t.Il Pullettn
    Po5t.il Pullettn Published daily, except Sundays and legal holidays, by direction of the Postmaster General, for the information and guidance of officers and employees of the Postal Service VOL. L WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, APRIL 30, 1929—Two Pages No. 14981 POSTMASTERS COMMISSIONED STATE OVERPRINTED POSTAGE STAMPS NOT TO BE PRECANCELED STAR-ROUTE SERVICE Fourth Class THIRD ASSISTANT POSTMASTER GENERAL, Discontinued April 27,1929 CALIFORNIA c Eden, Ariz., John W. Higgins. Washington, April 27, 1929. 76489. Escondido to San Diego. From May 15, c Aurora, Ark., Mrs. Delia L. Boatright. Postmasters at post offices in Kansas and Nebraska supplied with stocks 1929. (Superseded by No. 76639.) c York, Ky., Mrs. Edith Miller. of the special issue of State overprinted postage stamps, described in the NEW YORK c Duty, La., Albert J. Zeagler. POSTAL BULLETIN 7544. Riverhead to Quogue (n. o.). From c Capens, Me., Aaron Capen. notice in the of April 9, are advised that stamps of this March 16, 1929. c Atkins, Mich., Albert II. MacRury. variety should not be used for precanceling purposes when such printing c Cloverton, Minn., Mrs. Ida M. Austin. is done locally under the authorization of the department. Sufficient TEXAS c Cantwell, Mo., Fred B. Conway. 50170. Channing to Dumas. From May 31, c Mickleton, N. J., Seth H. Warrington. stocks of regular issue stamps in the required denominations should be 1929. (Superseded by No. 50814.) c Saltaire, N. Y., John H. L. Woodward. provided to meet the precanceling requirements at such post offices. c South Rutland, N. Y., Leslie J. Scriminger Changed be Arpelar, Okla., Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail
    TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PASSENGER RAIL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TECHNICAL REPORT DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE 2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 3 ANALYTICAL APPROACH 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6 STRATEGIES 27 NEXT STEPS 44 CONCLUSION 45 TECHNICAL REPORT PASSENGER RAIL DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT connectsocal.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM This Connect SoCal Passenger Rail report lays out a vision of passenger rail services for the SCAG Region for the next three decades. It demonstrates Passenger Rail the progress that has been made over the last two decades in terms of growing ridership, new rail services, capital improvements and new funding opportunities. It demonstrates the regional importance and significance of passenger rail in the SCAG region, and why growing rail services by increasing frequencies in underserved corridors, as well as establishing service in unserved markets, is crucial to the future mobility and sustainability of our region. The report highlights recent success in establishing new funding opportunities for passenger rail, including the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) and Senate Bill (SB) 1. Amtrak’s Pacific Surfliner intercity rail service is benefiting from these new funding opportunities as well as recent institutional arrangements that establish local control for the service. The Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) Southern California Optimized Rail Expansion (SCORE) program is an ambitious
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail
    TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PASSENGER RAIL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TECHNICAL REPORT ADOPTED ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE 2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 3 ANALYTICAL APPROACH 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS 7 STRATEGIES 28 NEXT STEPS 45 CONCLUSION 46 TECHNICAL REPORT PASSENGER RAIL ADOPTED ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 connectsocal.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM This Connect SoCal Passenger Rail report lays out a vision of passenger rail services for the SCAG Region for the next three decades. It demonstrates Passenger Rail the progress that has been made over the last two decades in terms of growing ridership, new rail services, capital improvements and new funding opportunities. It demonstrates the regional importance and significance of passenger rail in the SCAG region, and why growing rail services by increasing frequencies in underserved corridors, as well as establishing service in unserved markets, is crucial to the future mobility and sustainability of our region. The report highlights recent success in establishing new funding opportunities for passenger rail, including the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) and Senate Bill (SB) 1. Amtrak’s Pacific Surfliner intercity rail service is benefiting from these new funding opportunities as well as recent institutional arrangements that establish local control for the service. The Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) Southern California Optimized Rail Expansion (SCORE) program is an ambitious long-term capital improvement program to increase service on most of its lines to 15- and 30-minute frequencies, and SCRRA was recently awarded nearly one billion dollars in TIRCP funds for initial improvements. Finally, the report takes a look at existing conditions; a needs assessment which discusses, among other things, capacity constraints and opportunities for improved connectivity, including rail access to the region’s airports; and rail projects in the pipeline, both under construction and unfunded strategic long-term projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Ninth Edition
    Issue No. 9 (SPECIAL) - Friday, October 16, 2020 NINTH EDITION HERITAGE BUDD RDC CARS COMING TO WATERLOO REGIONREGIONREGION This issue is dedicated to a very special announcement by the Waterloo Central Railway and the Southern Ontario Locomotive Restoration Society. Over the last several months we have been working toward preserving another significant part of Canadian railway history. In the mid-1950’s the advent of the Budd Rail Diesel Car, famously known as the RDC, or in Canada as the Dayliner or Railliner, changed rail passenger travel permitting a more economical way to provide rail passenger service on both main and branch lines throughout the country. We are most fortunate to have acquired from VIA Rail RDC-1’s 6135, 6148 and RDC-2 6205, all three of which were stored serviceable several years ago. Along with these three RDC’s we have also acquired RDC-1’s 6111 and 6138 which although are in less favourable condition were worth saving from the scrappers torch. This issue will showcase our significant heritage acquisition along with the history of the RDC in North America. If you are not too keen on “Budd Cars”, this may not be the issue for you! Photo by Peter McGough New Additons To The WCR Heritage Rail Collection This remarkable set of events leading the WCR to this once in a lifetime acquisition for a heritage railway was put in motion by two volunteers who separately earlier this year had travelled by VIA passing the VIA Toronto Maintenance Centre noticing a number of Budd RDC cars stored there and which had been there for some time.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Ontario Shakemaps
    Development of Ontario ShakeMaps by SanLinn Isma'il Kaka A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Earth Sciences Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario, Canada December, 2005 © SanLinn I. Kaka, 2005 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 0-494-13393-7 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 0-494-13393-7 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ucrs-561-1997-Feb-395.Pdf
    PUBLISHED BY Upper Cartada Railway Society FEBRUARY 1997 P.O. Box 122, Station A NUMBER 561 Toronto, Ontario M5W IA2 ISSN 1193-797! Features this month Research and Reviews Transcontinental UCRS 1996 EXCURSION RAILWAY ARCHAEOLOGY 8 THERAPIDO 14 TO MONTREAL • Montreal's "Golden Chariot" obseratlon cars. • Three passenger-train items from Quebec. • Paul Bloxham describes our weekend trip INFORMATION NETWORK 10 THE PANORAMA 16 from Toronto to Montreal. • CP and STCUM/AMT equipment. • CPR's problems In the winter weather. TTC CONSIDERS OPPORTUNITIES DIESEL LOCOMOTIVES 12 IN TRANSIT 18 FOR NEW STREETCAR ROUTES REGULATORY MATTERS (TSB) 12 MOTIVE POWER 19 • A synopsis of a recent TTC report. • Report on Brockvllle accident. New power ordered by CPR and CN. Coming events business part of the meeting, we will con• tercity and non-InterCity trains. GB Railways Two of the most impxDrtant gatherings for tinue with a mixed selection of slides and has committed itself to introducing a thirty- railfans in Ontario are coming up in the next videotapes - please bring yours. minute weekday service between London few weeks. The following meeting will be on Friday, Liverpool Street and Norwich by September Toronto model railway show - March 22 and April 18. 2000 and a bus link between Colchester and 23, at the Toronto Congress Centre on Dixon Upcoming Hamilton meetings will be at Stansted Airport by July 1997. The company Road between Highway 27 and Martin Grove 8:00 p.m. on Friday March 21, and Friday is also committed to spending £2-miiiion on Road in Etobicoke. (Please take note of the April 25, both at the Hamilton Spectator station improvements." auditorium, 44 Frid Street, just off Main new location.) The hours are 11:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Canada Railway Society
    UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 STATION "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO The railway display in downtovm Lindsay, Ont., installed in 1988, features as its centrepiece CN SW8 7160, built in 1951 as 8510 and renumbered in 1956. Also present are two 40-foot steel boxcars and wooden caboose 78591, rebuilt circa 1948 from a GTW boxcar. The equipment is displayed on Victoria Ave. south of Kent St., on a remnant of the abandoned Haliburton Sub. still linked to active trackage in Lindsay. —Neil McCarten photo Detroit Citizens Ry. 3 pauses in front of Coble Hall, about to return along Washington Blvd. towards Woodward Ave., the Motor City's main thoroughfare. The ex-Lisbon car is painted red and cream. Jan. 19, 1980. —Tom VanDegrift photo May 1989 UCRS Newsletter 3 THE TRANSITION DECADE PART ONE By Julien R. Wolfe With 1988 marking the 30th anniversary of my first long fares could be expected to appeal to more youngsters per railfan trip, done while stiil a teenager, I began to think capita than would some cormtry freight branch that ran three about what changes I'd seen since this time. I am moving trains per week past the farm, usually at night. If this theory the clock back a bit further, to 1955, as that is when I first is true, we should in the future see more yormg fans stated shooting 35 mm colour slides-not an earthshaking emerging from the Edmontons, Vancouvers, San Joses and event, but perhaps an appropriate landmark for starting the _ San Diegos of this world than we saw in the relatively bleak comparison.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfalfa, Corn, Onions, Grains, Sugar Beets, Miscellaneous Crops, and Potatoes Research
    MALHEUR AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Alfalfa, Corn, Onions, Grains, Sugar Beets, Miscellaneous Crops, and Potatoes Research Special Report 832 February 1988 Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State University Corvallis MALHEUR AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION 1987 RESEARCH ALFALFA CORN ONIONS GRAINS SUGAR BEETS MISCELLANEOUS CROPS POTATOES Special Report 832, February 1988 Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State University, Corvallis MALHEUR EXPERIMENT STATION OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY ONTARIO, OREGON The Agricultural Experiment Station of Oregon State University was established 100 years ago at Corvallis, Oregon. The Hatch Act of 1887 provided annual funding for agricultural research at Land Grant Universities. The original Oregon experiment station was started in 1888 at Corvallis, on 35 acres and had a single laboratory. Currently, branch experiment stations are located at Aurora, Hood River, Moro, Hermiston, Pendleton, Union, Burns, Redmond, Medford, Klamath Falls, and Ontario. Local History In 1942 local farmers asked Oregon State University to establish a branch experiment station in Malheur County. Money was raised locally to buy the land which was eventually deeded to OSU in the mid- 1950s. Research operations began in 1942. Neil Hoffman was the first superintendent of the Malheur Experiment Station from 1946 to 1977. Facilities The Malheur Experiment Station includes 120 acres of row crop land and field equipment appropriate to research on onions, sugar beets, potatoes, small grains, alfalfa seed, and weed control research. Specialized facilities include an onion storage, onion artificial drier, potato storage, potato quality laboratory, and weather station. The potato quality laboratory emphasizes determinations of potato specific gravity and dark-end fry color. Nitrogen analyses are made in the laboratory for wheat and alfalfa research.
    [Show full text]
  • Malheur County Crop Research 1990
    Special Report 882 June 1991 Malheur Experiment Station Malheur County Crop Research 1990 Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State University Malheur Experiment Station Ontario, Oregon Malheur County Crop Research 1990 Special Report 882 May 1991 Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State University, Corvallis IMPORTANT NOTICE The following report includes information concerning unregistered used of pesticides. Experimental results should not be interpreted as recommendations for use. Use of unregistered materials or use of any registered pesticides inconsistent with its label is against both Federal Law and State Law. The use of certain products does not constitute endorsement by Oregon State University. CONTRIBUTORS MALHEUR EXPERIMENT STATION SPECIAL REPORT 882 MALHEUR COUNTY OFFICE, OSU EXTENSION SERVICE PERSONNEL: Jensen, Lynn Assistant Professor Simko, Ben Associate Professor MALHEUR EXPERIMENT STATION: Banner, Jennifer Research Aide Barnum, Mike Research Assistant Catey, Jeff Research Aide Feibert, Erik Research Assistant Holloway, Tammy Office Specialist Howell, Shawn Research Aide Ishida, Joey Bio Sciences Research, Technician 2 Kee, Mary Jo Office Coordinator Matsunaga, Teresa Research Aide Miller, John Assistant Professor Newman, Mark Research Aide Saunders, Lamont Bio Sciences Research, Technician 3 Shock, Clinton C. Superintendent and Assoc. Professor Smith, Robin Research Aide Stanger, Charles E. Professor of Crop Science Stieber, Tim Research Assistant OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY, CORVALLIS, AND OTHER STATIONS: Appleby, Arnold Professor, Dept. of Crop Science Baggett, James Professor, Dept. of Horticulture Burrill, Larry Weed Control Specialist Hane, Dan Research Assistant (Hermiston) Holmes, Zoe Ann Professor, Dept. of Foods and Nutrition James, Steven Research Assistant (Redmond) Koepsell, Paul Extension Plant Pathologist Kronstad, Warren Professor, Dept. of Crop Science Mosley, Alvin Associate Professor, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Eastern Oregon Station Report (2019)
    Central & Eastern Oregon Station Report 2019 Images that are not ODOT property are given credit to their owners within the caption. All photos that do not have a listed owner are property of ODOT. All written information is a product of field work or the accredited sources listed in the bibliography. Oregon Department of Transportation Rail Division 555 13th Street NE, Suite 3 Salem, OR 97301 Researched and written by Brandon Geiger. Edited by Robert Melbo. Cover Photos: Top — Amtrak Pioneer at The Dalles’ 2nd Street Station (Dan Haneckow) Bottom Left — Ontario OSL Depot Bottom Right — Cascade Locks Station Site Central & Eastern Oregon Station Report ODOT Rail & Public Transit Division September 2019 The contents of this report were researched a collected between July and September of 2019. All of the information provided within con- tent of the report is a product of site visits or secondary source material as referenced in the bibliography. The ODOT Rail Division is the sole producer of this document. Thank you to the following parties for their contributions: Baker County Mt. Hood Railroad Company Pacific Northwest Chapter of the National Railway Historical Society Troutdale Historical Society Umatilla County Historical Society This page left intentionally blank. Executive Summary……………………………………………………… 1 Background……………………………………………………………... 1 Scope……………………………………………………………………. 1 Context…………………………………………………………………. 2 Findings of the Report………………………………………………….. 4 Recommendations………………………………………………………. 5 The Way Forward……………………………………………………...... 6 Abbreviations……………………………………………………………. 6 Chapter One: Purpose & Methodology…………………………………. 7 Purpose of the Report…………………………………………………... 7 Report Methodology & Scope…………………………………………... 7 Chapter Two: Route Background……………………………………….. 11 Route Description……………………………………………………...... 11 History of Passenger Rail………………………………………………... 13 Pioneer’s Use of Waiting Shelters…………………………………………. 16 Amtrak Pioneer Reinstatement…………………………………………… 17 Chapter Three: Passenger Rail Service Options……………………….
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL Alternatives Analysis
    FINAL Alternatives Analysis Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Service Study Coachella Valley, CA July 25, 2016 Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Service Study Alternatives Analysis Contents ES Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... ix ES.1 Study Area ........................................................................................................... x ES.2 Market Analysis .................................................................................................. xi ES.3 Outreach ............................................................................................................ xii ES.4 Purpose and Need for the Study ........................................................................ xii ES.5 Identify Range of Route Alternatives ................................................................. xiii ES.6 Description of the Proposed Service .................................................................. xv ES.7 Screening Criteria and Methodology .................................................................. xv ES.8 Coarse-Level Screening ..................................................................................... xv ES.9 Fine-Level Screening ........................................................................................ xvi ES.10 Conclusion and Next Steps ...............................................................................xvii 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY 2-« UCRS Newsletter • October 1990
    INCORPORATED 1952 NUMBER 492 OCTOBER 1990 UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY 2-« UCRS Newsletter • October 1990 UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY EDITOR. IN THIS MONTH'S NEWSLETTER Pat Scrimgeour Adventures of the Rusty Railfans — 7 ... 3 CN Pelletier Subdivision 4 CONTRIBUTING EDITORS The Snowball/Gibson Railway 6 'Ttet4/i^jteteenrJohn Carter , Art Clowes, Scott Haskill, Accessible Transit 7 Don McQueen, Sean Robitallle, Transcontinental — Railway News 8 Number 492 - October 1990 Gray Scrimgeour, Chris Spinney, The Ferrophiliac Column 14 John Thompson, Gord Webster The Train Spotters 16 UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY GO Transit Locomotive Roster 16 RO. BOX 122, STATION A EDITORIAL ADVISOR In Transit 17 TORONTO, ONTARIO M5W 1A2 Stuart 1. Westland Book Review 19 NOTICES CALENDAR NEWSLETTER Friday, October 19 - UCRS Toronto meeting, 7:30 p.m., at the I wotild like to thank several people who have responded to Toronto Board of Education, 6t±i floor auditorium, 155 College direct requests for assistance in editing the Newsletter. Street at McCaul Avenue. Gordon Thompson will give an Beginning this month, John Carter; Gray Scrimgeour; and Gord illustrated talk on the railways and transit systems of Japan. Webster are editing most of the railway news, Sean Robitaille You'll see views of the famous Tokaido tine, preserved steam in is co-ordinating the Train Spotters column, and Scott Haskill is operation, side-of-the-road troUey operation, and iriuch more looking after the transit news. You will find addresses for these from this fascinating land. section editors at the ends of their debut columns this month. Friday, October 26 - UCRS Hamilton meeting, 8:00 p.m., at — Pat Scrimgeour the Hamilton Spectator auditorium, 44 Frid Street, just off Main UCRS 50TH ANNIVERSARY Street at Highway 403.
    [Show full text]