DOCSLIB.ORG

The Aspen Global Leadership Summit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

JULY 7 - 10, 2011 ASPEN, COLORADO The Aspen Global Leadership Summit The Aspen Institute mission is twofold: to foster values-based leadership, encourag- ing individuals to reflect on the ideals and ideas that define a good society, and to provide a neutral and balanced venue for discussing and acting on critical issues. The Aspen Institute does this primarily in four ways: seminars, young-leader fellowships around the globe, policy programs, and public conferences and events. The Institute is based in Washington, DC; Aspen, Colorado; and on the Wye River on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. The Institute also has an international network of partners in Spain, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan and Romania. The Aspen Global Leadership Network (AGLN) is a growing, worldwide community of entrepreneurial leaders from business, government and the nonprofit sector —cur- rently, more than 1,300 “Fellows” from 43 countries — who share a commitment to enlightened leadership and to using their extraordinary creativity, energy and re- sources to tackle the foremost societal challenges of our times. All share the common experience of participating in the Henry Crown Fellowship or one of the dozen As- pen Institute leadership initiatives it has inspired in the United States, Africa, Central America, India and the Middle East. WELCOME TO ACT II – THE BIENNIAL CONVENING OF THE ASPEN GLOBAL LEADERSHIP NETWORK! It’s a delight to be able to bring together so many Fellows from across the globe to pause, reflect, recharge and redouble our efforts to “make a dent in the universe.” We are also thrilled to have so many of the Fellows’ spouses and Aspen Institute trustees, moderators and supporters join us. Thank you for making the long and often arduous trek to Aspen. And thank you for making ACT II possible yet again. As always, ACT II is designed to give Fellows as much opportunity to interact and to draw inspiration as possible—whether at the seminar table, around the bonfire, or out on the hiking trail. Do take advantage of this opportunity. Leave your Blackberry or your iPhone in your room! Your most valuable “friends” are right here alongside you. It’s hard to believe that we were just 20 Fellows, all from the US, in 1997 when the first class of the Henry Crown Fellowship gathered here. Today, we are over 1300 Fellows from 43 countries – and growing. All of the Fellows are proven entrepreneurs. All have shared the common experience of hitting the “pause” button to stop and consider where they are in their life’s journey. All have committed to “paint on a broader canvas” as leaders in the companies, communities and countries where they live. The theme of this year’s ACT II is “Stepping Up.” Fellows have stepped up in so many ways: Stepped up to challenge the status quo. Stepped up to serve their countries. Stepped up to ensure that those around them can participate in “the good society” that is our common goal. It’s a good time to celebrate all that we are doing. And it’s a good time to ask if there is more that we can do…should do…must do. And so, as we come together, let’s have fun, for sure. But let’s also consider how we – this vibrant worldwide community of visionary, action-oriented leaders – can step up even further. Read the newspapers. Watch the news. The world needs enlightened leaders more than ever. Now is the time for the Aspen Global Leadership Network to step up to new heights. Peter A. Reiling Margot Pritzker Executive Vice President Trustee Henry Crown Fellow Chair, Leadership Committee The Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute July 7-10, 2011 1 ASPEN GLOBAL LEADERSHIP NETWORK WWW.ASPENINSTITUTE.ORG/LEADERSHIP For more than a decade, the Aspen Institute has supported programs for entrepreneurial leaders in the US and around the world. These initiatives share a common goal of encouraging a new generation of civically engaged men and women to move “from success to significance” and apply their talents to addressing the foremost challenges of their organizations, communities, and countries. The Aspen Institute has gathered these “Fellows” into a growing, worldwide community from business, government and civil society — currently, more than1300 Fellows from 43 countries — who share a commitment to enlightened leadership and to using their extraordinary creativity, energy and resources to tackle the foremost societal challenges of our times. Fellows are also required to design and carry out high-impact community projects. All share the common experience of participating in the Henry Crown Fellowship or one of the Leadership Initiatives it has inspired. FELLOWS COME FROM THE FOLLOWING LEADERSHIP INITIATIVES HENRY CROWN FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM (HCF) www.aspeninstitute.org/crown Founded in 1997, this flagship leadership initiative challenges the next generation of leaders, largely from the U.S. business sector, to use their talents and energies to make a difference in the world. This program honors the memory of Chicago industrialist Henry Crown (1896–1990), whose career was marked by a lifelong commitment to principles, integrity, industry, and philanthropy. AFRICA LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE (ALI) www.aspeninstitute.org/ali Founded in 2001, this initiative seeks to capture the energy, the talent and the resolve of an emerging generation of leaders in Africa The Henry Crown to engage in the foremost challenges of their Fellowship Program countries and their times. A collaborative Aspen Institute- The flagship leadership program. www.aspeninstitute.org/crown venture of the Institute, the Databank NewSchools Foundation (Ghana), Infotech Investments Fellows: Entrepreneurial (Tanzania), LEAP Africa (Nigeria), the Leaders for The Catto Fellowship Program Letsema Foundation (South Africa), and CETA Public Education Leaders in the environment. www.aspeninstitute.org/ Construction and Services (Mozambique), ALI www.aspeninstitute.org/catto has programs in West Africa, East Africa, South newschoolsfellows Africa, and Mozambique. The Liberty Fellowship LIBERTY FELLOWSHIP Leaders in the state The Aspen Institute-Rodel of South Carolina. www.aspeninstitute.org/liberty Fellowships in Public Leadership www.aspeninstitute.org/liberty Founded in 2003, the Liberty Fellowship American elected leaders. seeks to promote outstanding leadership in www.aspeninstitute.org/rodel South Carolina, empowering the state and its leaders to realize their full potential. Founded The Africa Leadership Initiative (ALI)/West Africa by Institute trustee Hayne Hipp, the Liberty Leaders in Ghana and Nigeria. Fellowship is a partnership of Hipp, the Aspen The Central America www.aspeninstitute.org/ali Institute and Wofford College where it is based. Leadership Initiative (CALI) www.aspeninstitute.org/cali CENTRAL AMERICA LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE (CALI) Nigeria Leadership Initiative- Senior Fellows Program www.aspeninstitute.org/cali www.aspeninstitute.org/nli Founded by two Henry Crown Fellows in 2004, this leadership initiative seeks to develop the values-based leadership talent in all six countries of Central America and is a partnership between the Aspen Institute, TechnoServe, INCAE, and FUNDEMAS. It was formalized as an independent non-profit CALI Foundation in 2007. 2 ACT II: Stepping Up ASPEN INSTItute-RODEL FELLOWSHIPS IN PUBLIC LEADERSHIP www.aspeninstitute.org/rodel Launched in 2005, these fellowships seek to strengthen US democracy by bringing together the nation’s most promising young elected political leaders, both Democrats and Republicans, to explore Western democratic values and the responsibilities of public leadership. The initiative is committed to helping Fellows achieve their fullest potential in public service through thoughtful and civil bipartisan dialogue. INDIA LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE (ILI) www.aspeninstitute.org/ili Launched in 2006, this initiative is a collaboration of The Aspen Institute US and The Aspen Institute India that helps leaders from across India explore leadership approaches to addressing challenges faced by the world’s largest democracy. NIGERIA LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE SENIOR FELLOWS PROGRAM (NLI) www.aspeninstitute.org/nliseniorfellows Begun in 2006 by Segun Aganga, an ALI Fellow, and Dr. Christopher Kolade, Nigeria’s then High Commissioner to the UK, this program focuses on senior leaders in Nigeria and in the Diaspora. Its goal is to effect positive change in the most populous country in Africa through a growing network of community-spirited, values-based leaders. ASPEN INSTItute-NEwSCHOOLS: ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERS FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION www.aspeninstitute.org/newschoolsfellows Launched in 2007 in partnership with the NewSchools Venture Fund through a ince 1997, the Institute has built a series of programs for accomplished collaboration of two Henry Crown Fellows, leaders in the United States and abroad—from South Carolina to South this program offers entrepreneurial leaders SAfrica. Beginning with and inspired by the Henry Crown Fellowship in US education an opportunity to broaden Program, these initiatives share a goal of developing a new generation of civi- their perspectives, build networks of like- cally engaged men and women by encouraging them to move “from success minded change agents, and hone their skills in values-based leadership to improve US public to significance.” education. Each program selects an annual class of approximately 20 proven leaders CaTTO FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM www.aspeninstitute.org/catto Established in 2007, with support from Aspen The India Leadership Institute trustee Henry Catto and his wife, Jessica, Initiative (ILI)
Recommended publications
  • Global Philanthropy Forum Conference April 18–20 · Washington, Dc

    Global Philanthropy Forum Conference April 18–20 · Washington, Dc

    GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY FORUM CONFERENCE APRIL 18–20 · WASHINGTON, DC 2017 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference This book includes transcripts from the plenary sessions and keynote conversations of the 2017 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference. The statements made and views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of GPF, its participants, World Affairs or any of its funders. Prior to publication, the authors were given the opportunity to review their remarks. Some have made minor adjustments. In general, we have sought to preserve the tone of these panels to give the reader a sense of the Conference. The Conference would not have been possible without the support of our partners and members listed below, as well as the dedication of the wonderful team at World Affairs. Special thanks go to the GPF team—Suzy Antounian, Bayanne Alrawi, Laura Beatty, Noelle Germone, Deidre Graham, Elizabeth Haffa, Mary Hanley, Olivia Heffernan, Tori Hirsch, Meghan Kennedy, DJ Latham, Jarrod Sport, Geena St. Andrew, Marla Stein, Carla Thorson and Anna Wirth—for their work and dedication to the GPF, its community and its mission. STRATEGIC PARTNERS Newman’s Own Foundation USAID The David & Lucile Packard The MasterCard Foundation Foundation Anonymous Skoll Foundation The Rockefeller Foundation Skoll Global Threats Fund Margaret A. Cargill Foundation The Walton Family Foundation Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation The World Bank IFC (International Finance SUPPORTING MEMBERS Corporation) The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust MEMBERS Conrad N. Hilton Foundation Anonymous Humanity United Felipe Medina IDB Omidyar Network Maja Kristin Sall Family Foundation MacArthur Foundation Qatar Foundation International Charles Stewart Mott Foundation The Global Philanthropy Forum is a project of World Affairs.
  • Adjudicating Human Rights in Transitional Contexts: a Nigerian Case-Study, 1999-2009 Basil Emeka Ugochukwu

    Adjudicating Human Rights in Transitional Contexts: a Nigerian Case-Study, 1999-2009 Basil Emeka Ugochukwu

    Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons PhD Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2014 Adjudicating Human Rights in Transitional Contexts: A Nigerian Case-Study, 1999-2009 Basil Emeka Ugochukwu Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/phd Part of the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Ugochukwu, Basil Emeka, "Adjudicating Human Rights in Transitional Contexts: A Nigerian Case-Study, 1999-2009 " (2014). PhD Dissertations. 1. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/phd/1 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in PhD Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. Adjudicating Human Rights in Transitional Contexts: A Nigerian Case-Study, 1999-2009 Basil Emeka Ugochukwu A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Law, Osgoode Hall Law School York University, Toronto, Ontario March 2014 © Basil Emeka Ugochukwu, 2014 Abstract While transitional justice and democracy literature bristles with the expectation that human rights conditions would improve with the progression from the “darkness” of a dictatorship to the “light” of democratic rule, Nigeria’s transition to civil rule in 1999 would seem to provide a sobering contra-reality. Democracy does not seem to have produced a better human rights environment in the post-transition Nigerian context. This dissertation answers the question why the restoration of civil rule in Nigeria has not translated to results in human rights practices that come close to matching the expectations of its citizens and the predictions of transitional justice literature? It investigates, however, only the extent to which human rights violations correlates with the lack of effective judicial protection of those rights between 1999 and 2009.
  • Connecticut College Magazine, Summer 1999

    Connecticut College Magazine, Summer 1999

    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Linda Lear Center for Special Collections & Alumni News Archives Summer 1999 Connecticut College Magazine, Summer 1999 Connecticut College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/alumnews Recommended Citation Connecticut College, "Connecticut College Magazine, Summer 1999" (1999). Alumni News. 347. https://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/alumnews/347 This Magazine is brought to you for free and open access by the Linda Lear Center for Special Collections & Archives at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Alumni News by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. Contents Summer 1999 Vol. 8, No. 3 CONNECTICUT CO LLEG £Magazine • PEER PROFILES: 14 p. 57: Liz tone '49, hampion row r COMMENCEMENT p. 63: i ki Rogo in Lansl-. '63, The Class of 1999 bo k publish r p. 67: Li a Kaufman er hbow '75, art oil tor 16 p. 71: P ter John ton ' , ailb at maker VERBATIM p. 75 F rnand puela '88, Frank Mc ourt on teaching, writing f under of tarM dia and the meri an dream 19 LIKE FATHER, LIKE SONS 2 The President's Page hri ooper '77 and hri ooper '99, . .' fir t father- on I ga y 3 Letters to the Editor 5 CC students help NL school 20 CHAPTER AND VERSE 6 Solar timepiece in the Plex Thoreau lives next door 7 From Brazil to Japan David R. Fo ter '76 re i it Thoreau' 01111try 8 Social justice in New London 9 Walkway will link campus to NL CLASSso NOTES orrespondent ' report 10 Fulbright and Watson winners 11 Researching a CT river 80 12 Monk by the Sea LAST LOOK see page 75 features 40 THE DANCE Writing teacher Barbara Flug olin '61 learn a les on in humanity from her ph ically hallenged tudents.
  • 2006-07 Annual Report

    2006-07 Annual Report

    ����������������������������� the chicago council on global affairs 1 The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, founded in 1922 as The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, is a leading independent, nonpartisan organization committed to influencing the discourse on global issues through contributions to opinion and policy formation, leadership dialogue, and public learning. The Chicago Council brings the world to Chicago by hosting public programs and private events featuring world leaders and experts with diverse views on a wide range of global topics. Through task forces, conferences, studies, and leadership dialogue, the Council brings Chicago’s ideas and opinions to the world. 2 the chicago council on global affairs table of contents the chicago council on global affairs 3 Message from the Chairman The world has undergone On September 1, 2006, The Chicago Council on tremendous change since Foreign Relations became The Chicago Council on The Chicago Council was Global Affairs. The new name respects the Council’s founded in 1922, when heritage – a commitment to nonpartisanship and public nation-states dominated education – while it signals an understanding of the the international stage. changing world and reflects the Council’s increased Balance of power, national efforts to contribute to national and international security, statecraft, and discussions in a global era. diplomacy were foremost Changes at The Chicago Council are evident on on the agenda. many fronts – more and new programs, larger and more Lester Crown Today, our world diverse audiences, a step-up in the pace of task force is shaped increasingly by forces far beyond national reports and conferences, heightened visibility, increased capitals.
  • New South African Constitution and Ethnic Division, the Stephen Ellmann New York Law School, Stephen.Ellmann@Nyls.Edu

    New South African Constitution and Ethnic Division, the Stephen Ellmann New York Law School, [email protected]

    digitalcommons.nyls.edu Faculty Scholarship Articles & Chapters 1994 New South African Constitution and Ethnic Division, The Stephen Ellmann New York Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters Recommended Citation 26 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 5 (1994-1995) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles & Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. THE NEW SOUTH AFRICAN CONSTITUTION AND ETHNIC DIVISION by Stephen Ellmann* I. INTRODUCTION In an era of ethnic slaughter in countries from Bosnia to Rwanda, the peril of ethnic division cannot be ignored. Reducing that peril by constitutional means is no simple task, for when ethnic groups pull in different directions a free country can only produce harmony between them by persuading each to honor some claims of the other and to moderate some claims of its own. It will require much more than technical ingenuity in constitution-writing to generate such mutual forbearance. Moreover, constitutional provisions that promote this goal will inevitably do so at a price - namely, the reduction of any single group's ability to work its will through the political process. And that price is likely to be most painful to pay when it entails restraining a group's ability to achieve goals that are just - for example, when it limits the ability of the victims of South African apartheid to redress the profound injustice they have suffered. This Article examines the efforts of the drafters of the new transitional South African Constitution to overcome ethnic division, or alternatively to accommodate it.
  • College Voice Vol. 9 No. 10

    College Voice Vol. 9 No. 10

    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College 1985-1986 Student Newspapers 12-11-1985 College Voice Vol. 9 No. 10 Connecticut College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/ccnews_1985_1986 Recommended Citation Connecticut College, "College Voice Vol. 9 No. 10" (1985). 1985-1986. 13. https://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/ccnews_1985_1986/13 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Newspapers at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1985-1986 by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. THE COLEEGE VOICE DECEMBER II. 19115 'OLUME IX. NUMBER 10 CONNECTICUT COLLEGE'S 75TH ANNIVERSARY Long Range Plans for Improvement tive campus center were noted. infirmary building and the in- by Shelley Brown "By moving the post office firmary would then be moved Major changes may be in and bookshop to a more cen- to Lazrus Dormitory store for the Connecticut Col- tral location (such as Crozier Lazrus students displaced lege campus if the proposed Williams), faculty, students by the move would most likely plans of the Long Range Plan- and administrators would rub live in Winthrop Hall, which ning Committee are approved elbows on a daily basis," said would once again be used as a by the Board of Trustees. architect Raymond Sevigny. dorm. The possibility of a new Faculty and students were in- The Dance department's im- dorm was also considered. A vited to respond to the Com- mediate needs were assessed new location for a larger com- mittee's plan of changes for and the architects said that puter center was discussed, the Campus in a meeting held ideally an additional building and agreed on as the present Monday, November 25 in should be added below Cum- post office.
  • Henry Crown Jun 13, 1896 - Aug 14, 1990

    Henry Crown Jun 13, 1896 - Aug 14, 1990

    Henry Crown Jun 13, 1896 - Aug 14, 1990 SOLDIER DETAILS HIGHEST RANK: Colonel DIVISION: Army, Corps of Engineers THEATER OF OPERATION: American Henry SERVED: Dec 23, 1942 - Sep 15, 1945 Crown MILITARY HONORS: His wartime efforts earned Army him the Legion of Merit for 'his unusual ability, resourcefulness, and loyal devotion...and for materially aiding the nation’s war effort.' The French and Greek governments also honored him. BIOGRAPHY In the ranking of America’s legendary business leaders, Henry Crown, an unassuming man of moderate height and build, stands as tall as the Empire State Building which he once owned. No one, and nothing, could keep him down. This creator of vast empires of factories and machines and jobs and wealth was the son of a Russian street peddler. He left school in the eighth grade to deliver groceries. At the height of his powers he ate at the table of presidents, and yet every day he nurtured his lifelong friendships. During a career that spanned this century and culminated in his control of General Dynamics, he became one of this country’s greatest philanthropists. He sat in the most powerful boardrooms in America, and he knew his employees by name and cared about them like family. Henry Crown controlled interests in American industry worth billions of dollars, but the stocks and bonds that were closest to his heart were character, principles, strongly held beliefs, high moral values, honor and integrity. When he died in 1990 at the age of 94, he left a legacy of greatness and goodness hardly matched in the history of corporate America.
  • Argentina-Punto-Com: an Analysis of the Development of the Dot-Com Sector in Argentina

    Argentina-Punto-Com: an Analysis of the Development of the Dot-Com Sector in Argentina

    Argentina-punto-com: An Analysis of the Development of the Dot-com Sector in Argentina Ed Marcum The Lauder Institute April 10, 2001 Introduction....................................................................................................................................1 Section I – Foundations and Fundamental Drivers ...................................................................5 Wealth.......................................................................................................................................5 Education..................................................................................................................................7 Infrastructure ...........................................................................................................................9 Public Policy ..........................................................................................................................13 Government/Stability ...........................................................................................................16 Section II – Other Drivers ...........................................................................................................18 Timing .....................................................................................................................................18 Venture Capital......................................................................................................................20 Other Actors ...........................................................................................................................22
  • Jpmorgan Gave Risk Oversight to Museum Head Bloomberg Businessweek Dawn Kopecki and Max Abelson May 24, 2012

    Jpmorgan Gave Risk Oversight to Museum Head Bloomberg Businessweek Dawn Kopecki and Max Abelson May 24, 2012

    JPMorgan Gave Risk Oversight to Museum Head Bloomberg Businessweek Dawn Kopecki and Max Abelson May 24, 2012 The three directors who oversee risk at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) include a museum head who sat on American International Group Inc.’s governance committee in 2008, the grandson of a billionaire and the chief executive officer of a company that makes flight controls and work boots. What the risk committee of the biggest U.S. lender lacks, and what the five next largest competitors have, are directors who worked at a bank or as financial risk managers. The only member with any Wall Street experience, James Crown, hasn’t been employed in the industry for more than 25 years. “It seems hard to believe that this is good enough,” said Anat Admati, a professor of finance at Stanford University who studies corporate governance. “It’s a massive task to watch the risk of JPMorgan.” The bank has been under siege since CEO Jamie Dimon said May 10 that the firm’s chief investment office suffered a $2 billion loss trading credit derivatives. He later called it “a Risk 101 mistake.” Shares of the New York-based company have fallen 17 percent since, and at least half a dozen agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission, are investigating. The probes began after traders in the London office, which manages the bank’s excess cash, made wrong-way bets on illiquid credit derivatives, some of them so large they distorted market prices. Dimon transformed the division under Ina Drew, who resigned over the losses, from a sleepy haven for traders of U.S.
  • Bridging the Gap: Rebuilding Citizen Trust in Media

    Bridging the Gap: Rebuilding Citizen Trust in Media

    Bridging the Gap Rebuilding Citizen Trust in Media Anya Schiffrin, Beatrice Santa-Wood, Susanna De Martino with Nicole Pope and Ellen Hume ABOUT THE AUTHORS Anya Schiffrin is the director of the Technology, Media, and Communications specialization at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs, where she teaches courses on media development and innovation and social change. Among other topics, she writes on journalism and development as well as the media in Africa and the extractive sector. She served for nine years on the advisory board of the Open Society Foundations’ Program on Independent Journalism and is a member of the OSF Global board. Her most recent book is African Muckraking: 50 Years of African Investigative Journalism (Jacana: 2017). Beatrice Louise Santa-Wood recently earned her Master’s degree from the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University, where she specialized in human rights and was senior editor of the Journal of International Affairs. Susanna De Martino is a research assistant for Anya Schiffrin at Columbia University. She studies political science at Barnard College. Nicole Pope is a Swiss journalist and writer based in Berlin. She lived 30 years in Turkey and contributed to numerous publications, serving for 15 years as the Turkey correspondent for Le Monde. Ellen Hume is a teacher, journalist and founding member of International Media Development Advisers. She has served as White House correspondent for the Wall Street Journal, research director of the Center for Civic Media at MIT, executive director of Harvard’s Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, and as first executive director of the PBS Democracy Project.
  • JULY 29-AUGUST 1, 2014 the Aspen Institute Is an Educational and Policy Studies Organization Based in Washington, DC

    JULY 29-AUGUST 1, 2014 the Aspen Institute Is an Educational and Policy Studies Organization Based in Washington, DC

    JULY 29-AUGUST 1, 2014 The Aspen Institute is an educational and policy studies organization based in Washington, DC. Its mission is to foster leadership based on enduring values and to provide a nonpartisan venue for dealing with critical issues. The Institute has campuses in Aspen, Colorado, and on the Wye River on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. It also maintains offices in New York City and has an international network of partners. For more information, visit www.aspeninstitute.org. The Aspen Global Leadership Network (AGLN) is a worldwide community of successful, high-integrity, entrepreneurial leaders, called Aspen Global Leadership Fellows. Because of their demonstrated leadership accomplishments and abilities, these Fellows have been selected to be part of one of 12 active or sector-specific Fellowships around the world. These Fellowships include or are modeled after the Aspen Institute’s flagship values-based leadership program, the Henry Crown Fellowship Program, launched in 1997. Fellows enter their program having demonstrated a great deal of personal success. They leave it inspired to make a greater mark on their communities and the world; to move, as we say, “from success to significance.” In between, they are provided with an intimate forum for deep introspection, probing dialogue, and interactive problem-solving. The Aspen Global Leadership Network is designed to spur these Fellows to stretch themselves — to take their leadership to greater heights and broaden their impact to include society at large. The Network connects Fellows through events like the Aspen Action Forum so that they can learn from, collaborate with, and support one another. The Aspen Global Leadership Network includes nearly 1,900 Fellows from 48 countries — and is growing.
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ------X : SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : 06 Civ

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ------X : SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : 06 Civ

    Case 1:06-cv-02435-PAE-DCF Document 208 Filed 10/26/12 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X : SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : 06 Civ. 2435 (PAE) Plaintiff, : : OPINION & ORDER -v- : : FERNANDO J. ESPUELAS et al., : : Defendants. : : ------------------------------------------------------------------------X PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: In this lawsuit, the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has sued various former executives of StarMedia Network, Inc. (“StarMedia” or the “Company”) for accounting fraud. Pending here is defendant Betsy Scolnik’s motion for summary judgment as to the remaining claims against her: for aiding and abetting StarMedia’s violations of Sections 13(a) and 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13, and for directly violating Exchange Act Rule 13b2-1. For the reasons stated below, Scolnik’s motion is granted. I. Background and Undisputed Facts1 1 The Court’s account of the underlying facts of this case is drawn from the parties’ respective Local Rule 56.1 Statements (“Pl.’s 56.1”, “Def.’s 56.1”, and “Pl.’s Reply 56.1”), as well as, where uncontested, various exhibits to the parties’ submissions on the instant motion. These submissions include: the Declaration of Ana C. Reyes in Support of Scolnik’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Reyes Decl.”), and attached exhibits; the Declaration of Paul W. Sharratt in Opposition to Scolnik’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Sharratt Decl.”), and attached exhibits; and the Declaration of Michael Hartman in Opposition to Scolnik’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Hartman Decl.”), and attached exhibits.