Adjudicating Human Rights in Transitional Contexts: a Nigerian Case-Study, 1999-2009 Basil Emeka Ugochukwu

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Adjudicating Human Rights in Transitional Contexts: a Nigerian Case-Study, 1999-2009 Basil Emeka Ugochukwu Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons PhD Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2014 Adjudicating Human Rights in Transitional Contexts: A Nigerian Case-Study, 1999-2009 Basil Emeka Ugochukwu Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/phd Part of the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Ugochukwu, Basil Emeka, "Adjudicating Human Rights in Transitional Contexts: A Nigerian Case-Study, 1999-2009 " (2014). PhD Dissertations. 1. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/phd/1 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in PhD Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. Adjudicating Human Rights in Transitional Contexts: A Nigerian Case-Study, 1999-2009 Basil Emeka Ugochukwu A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Law, Osgoode Hall Law School York University, Toronto, Ontario March 2014 © Basil Emeka Ugochukwu, 2014 Abstract While transitional justice and democracy literature bristles with the expectation that human rights conditions would improve with the progression from the “darkness” of a dictatorship to the “light” of democratic rule, Nigeria’s transition to civil rule in 1999 would seem to provide a sobering contra-reality. Democracy does not seem to have produced a better human rights environment in the post-transition Nigerian context. This dissertation answers the question why the restoration of civil rule in Nigeria has not translated to results in human rights practices that come close to matching the expectations of its citizens and the predictions of transitional justice literature? It investigates, however, only the extent to which human rights violations correlates with the lack of effective judicial protection of those rights between 1999 and 2009. The methodology is mostly interdisciplinary. The discussion is organized around doctrinal legal reasoning and case-law analysis. First analyzed were cases decided prior to 1999 to show the slippery provenance and inadequacy of the current rights-based adjudication standards. Cases decided since 1999 were then evaluated to measure the claim that the judiciary is failing in its duty as guardians of human rights post-transition. To that extent, the dissertation has not limited itself to a single theoretical model. It was found that some of the biggest problems afflicting human rights adjudication in Nigeria are historically defined. A major challenge is the apparent lack of a clear standard for reviewing laws and actions against the constitutional requirement that they be reasonably justifiable in a democratic society. This creates a culture where human ii rights cases are approached on an ad hoc case-by-case basis such that contradictory decisions are possible from cases with similar facts. Dealing with this challenge is not helped by the country’s legal history and the doctrines of the British legal system that a colonial relationship fostered after independence. The current approach is therefore still orientated towards British administrative law principles which did not demand the standard of intense scrutiny required for the effective protection of human rights norms. The dissertation therefore recommends a reformed system of legal education with strong comparative approaches to change this orientation. iii Dedication To the Memory of my father SYLVANUS UWAUIKE UGOCHUKWU Who had very little education himself, yet recognized its capacity to liberate And To the Memory of PA JOB OKORIE NWAJIUBA For an hour of blessings and a classic suit jacket. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation benefited from the contributions of several individuals and institutions. My initial gratitude goes to my Supervisor, Professor Obiora Chinedu Okafor who brought a fecund, insightful and generous intellectual enthusiasm to his role. He questioned, stimulated, directed, and sharpened my thoughts around the themes covered in this work in ways I never could have imagined. And he did so always with a ready smile and a good heart even at times (and those times were many!) when I struggled to be motivated. I also would like to thank the other members of my Committee – Professor Bruce Ryder who was there from the beginning and Professor Faisal Bhabha who replaced Professor Craig Scott after the latter won election into the Canadian Parliament. Professor Scott’s early inputs to the research are gratefully acknowledged. My gratitude extends to Mrs. Yemisi Dina, my Osgoode Hall Law School reference Librarian who ensured that the resources I needed to do my work were readily available. I started the doctoral program at a time of significant physical re-structuring at the Law School. The library had been moved to a different location and most of the book collections were in deep, deep storage. Regardless, Mrs. Dina worked ever so hard to provide all the materials I needed. As well, in the course of my program, I had the good fortune of studying under some of Osgoode’s most outstanding scholars. Many thanks to Professors Allan Hutchinson, Shelley Gavigan and Peer Zumbersen for their mentorship and helpful encouragement along the way. v I shared significant portions of this dissertation (while work on it progressed) at a variety of academic forums. I am grateful to the Osgoode administration for sponsoring me to two sessions of the AGORA Doctoral Workshops of the Association of Transnational Law Schools (ATLAS). I had my first experience in the summer of 2010 at the New York University Law School and received very helpful feedback from colleagues and friends, including Tawanda Mutasah, Sujith Xavier, Karen Loevy, Nerit Ferencz, Guy Sinclair, Jose Ramon Canedo, Magda Karagiannakis, Naiara Arriola, Jaclyn Neo, Paula Angulo and Nourit Zimerman. I also attended the 2012 forum at the Bar Ilan University Law School in Tel Aviv. Lisa Kerr, Jonathan Kolieb, Sirus Kashefi, Nicholas Leger-Riopel, Yaniv Rosnai, Orly Stern and Professor Itay Bar-Siman Tov were also very generous with their comments and suggestions. I am grateful as well to peers at Yale Law School for inviting me to participate in their 2012 Doctoral Scholarship Conference and to Radidja Nemar, Yoon Jin Shin, Mohsin Alam, Ryan Thoreson, and Joanna Noronha for warmly receiving and commenting on my presentation. I made many friends at Osgoode whose encouragement and support I needed from time to time to scale the pain threshold. I owe them a great debt of gratitude for being ever so kind and holding me close to their hearts. You know yourselves. However, I must mention past and current fellows at the Osgoode Critical Research Laboratory in Law and Society and fellow doctoral students with whom I shared many stimulating academic engagements especially in the Emerging Scholars and Graduate Work-in-Progress Workshops. This is for you Sujith Xavier, Igor Gontcharov, Colleen Matthews, Sheila Jennings, Ruba Ali Al-Hassani, Vanisha Sukdeo, Marsha Cardogan, Natasha MacLeod, vi Shanthi Senthe, David Hughes, Todne Bryan, Jennifer Leitch, Brent Cook, Irma Spahiu, Elizabeth Kirly, Estair van Wagner, Charis Kamphuis and Patricia Hania. Thanks for your friendship and all the wonderful times together Ifeanyi & Chizo Okorie, Mike Habicher and Michelle Kisluk, Iloh & Nkeiru Nzekwe-Akubuo, Professor Ikechi Mgbeoji, Stella Igwenazor and Martin & Nkem Ezeudu. Sir Jonah Nwajiuba, please accept a heartfelt gratitude for starting me off on a strong footing and Professor Chinedum Nwajiuba for giving me belief. I am indebted to my wife, Nkechi for the sacrifices she had to make and to my kids – Justice, Chimdiya and Chizaram – for making home sweet and rough in equal measure. I thank my mother Cecilia, brothers Joseph, Chikaodi, and Onyekachi and sisters Grace and Chinyere for their prayers. I cannot possibly forget the Canadian people whose taxes meant that I could concentrate on reaching for my dreams. vii Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................ ii Dedication ........................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements ........................................................................................... v Chapter One Constructing the Democratic Transition and the Human Rights Adjudication Problematique ......................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Human Rights: Tracking from the Past to the Present ................................................... 7 1.3. On a Jet-Plane: Courts in Transition ............................................................................. 13 1.4. Compulsory or Elective Triangularity? Democracy, Law, and Human Rights ............. 17 1.5. Paradoxes: Failing on the Promises Of Democracy and Human Rights ...................... 24 1.6. The Heart of the Matter: Courts and Human Rights .................................................... 30 1.7. Tower of Babel: The Birth of an Academic Obsession ................................................. 35 1.8. Stalemate: Judicial Review in Action ............................................................................ 38 1.9. The Importance
Recommended publications
  • Global Philanthropy Forum Conference April 18–20 · Washington, Dc
    GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY FORUM CONFERENCE APRIL 18–20 · WASHINGTON, DC 2017 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference This book includes transcripts from the plenary sessions and keynote conversations of the 2017 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference. The statements made and views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of GPF, its participants, World Affairs or any of its funders. Prior to publication, the authors were given the opportunity to review their remarks. Some have made minor adjustments. In general, we have sought to preserve the tone of these panels to give the reader a sense of the Conference. The Conference would not have been possible without the support of our partners and members listed below, as well as the dedication of the wonderful team at World Affairs. Special thanks go to the GPF team—Suzy Antounian, Bayanne Alrawi, Laura Beatty, Noelle Germone, Deidre Graham, Elizabeth Haffa, Mary Hanley, Olivia Heffernan, Tori Hirsch, Meghan Kennedy, DJ Latham, Jarrod Sport, Geena St. Andrew, Marla Stein, Carla Thorson and Anna Wirth—for their work and dedication to the GPF, its community and its mission. STRATEGIC PARTNERS Newman’s Own Foundation USAID The David & Lucile Packard The MasterCard Foundation Foundation Anonymous Skoll Foundation The Rockefeller Foundation Skoll Global Threats Fund Margaret A. Cargill Foundation The Walton Family Foundation Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation The World Bank IFC (International Finance SUPPORTING MEMBERS Corporation) The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust MEMBERS Conrad N. Hilton Foundation Anonymous Humanity United Felipe Medina IDB Omidyar Network Maja Kristin Sall Family Foundation MacArthur Foundation Qatar Foundation International Charles Stewart Mott Foundation The Global Philanthropy Forum is a project of World Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • New South African Constitution and Ethnic Division, the Stephen Ellmann New York Law School, [email protected]
    digitalcommons.nyls.edu Faculty Scholarship Articles & Chapters 1994 New South African Constitution and Ethnic Division, The Stephen Ellmann New York Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters Recommended Citation 26 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 5 (1994-1995) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles & Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. THE NEW SOUTH AFRICAN CONSTITUTION AND ETHNIC DIVISION by Stephen Ellmann* I. INTRODUCTION In an era of ethnic slaughter in countries from Bosnia to Rwanda, the peril of ethnic division cannot be ignored. Reducing that peril by constitutional means is no simple task, for when ethnic groups pull in different directions a free country can only produce harmony between them by persuading each to honor some claims of the other and to moderate some claims of its own. It will require much more than technical ingenuity in constitution-writing to generate such mutual forbearance. Moreover, constitutional provisions that promote this goal will inevitably do so at a price - namely, the reduction of any single group's ability to work its will through the political process. And that price is likely to be most painful to pay when it entails restraining a group's ability to achieve goals that are just - for example, when it limits the ability of the victims of South African apartheid to redress the profound injustice they have suffered. This Article examines the efforts of the drafters of the new transitional South African Constitution to overcome ethnic division, or alternatively to accommodate it.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Gap: Rebuilding Citizen Trust in Media
    Bridging the Gap Rebuilding Citizen Trust in Media Anya Schiffrin, Beatrice Santa-Wood, Susanna De Martino with Nicole Pope and Ellen Hume ABOUT THE AUTHORS Anya Schiffrin is the director of the Technology, Media, and Communications specialization at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs, where she teaches courses on media development and innovation and social change. Among other topics, she writes on journalism and development as well as the media in Africa and the extractive sector. She served for nine years on the advisory board of the Open Society Foundations’ Program on Independent Journalism and is a member of the OSF Global board. Her most recent book is African Muckraking: 50 Years of African Investigative Journalism (Jacana: 2017). Beatrice Louise Santa-Wood recently earned her Master’s degree from the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University, where she specialized in human rights and was senior editor of the Journal of International Affairs. Susanna De Martino is a research assistant for Anya Schiffrin at Columbia University. She studies political science at Barnard College. Nicole Pope is a Swiss journalist and writer based in Berlin. She lived 30 years in Turkey and contributed to numerous publications, serving for 15 years as the Turkey correspondent for Le Monde. Ellen Hume is a teacher, journalist and founding member of International Media Development Advisers. She has served as White House correspondent for the Wall Street Journal, research director of the Center for Civic Media at MIT, executive director of Harvard’s Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, and as first executive director of the PBS Democracy Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Diary of an Election Observer
    Michigan Journal of International Law Volume 18 Issue 3 1997 The Fallacy of Neutrality: Diary of an Election Observer Jeanne M. Woods Loyola University New Orleans School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Election Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation Jeanne M. Woods, The Fallacy of Neutrality: Diary of an Election Observer, 18 MICH. J. INT'L L. 475 (1997). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol18/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Journal of International Law at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FALLACY OF NEUTRALITY: DIARY OF AN ELECTION OBSERVER Jeanne M. Woods* "What's past is Prologue... Tuesday, April 26, 1994. Shrouded in a Rawlsian veil of ignorance,2 1 have no anchor in time or space. The veil is quite fashionable: lacy; black; seductive. Draped in its folds I am ageless and nameless, undefined by race, creed, or gen- der. I have no past. My will is free, unencumbered by history or tradi- tion. I am newly born. Nearby in a Capetown hospital, another newborn prepares to emerge from the dark warmth of her mother's womb. At 1:45 p.m., a baby girl will brave the glare of flourescent reality as her mother is gently coaxed by those around her.
    [Show full text]
  • On Assignment: a Guide to Reporting in Dangerous Situations
    On Assignment: A Guide to Reporting in Dangerous Situations The publication of this handbook was made possible by the following contributors: Andrews McMeel Publishing CNN The Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation The Gannett Foundation The Poynter Institute Table of Contents On Assignment: A Guide to Reporting in Dangerous Situations I. Introduction.......................................................................1 II. Who is at Risk?................................................................ 5 III. Covering Conflict............................................................7 Training.................................................................................................... 8 How do you decide whether it is best to blend in or be clearly identified as a journalist while working in a combat zone? by Charles Hanley..............................................................................8 Security Training Courses.................................................................8 Biochemical Courses.......................................................................10 Security Training Firms....................................................................10 Security Literature............................................................................14 Funding for Security Courses..........................................................14 Protective Gear......................................................................................15 Body Armor......................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • ISOJ 2020: Day 5, Brunch Workshop
    ISOJ 2020: Day 5, Brunch Workshop Seeking New Ideas to Fund Public Interest Media in the U.S. and Globally ________________________________________________________________________ Chair: Anya Schiffrin, senior lecturer, Columbia University • Sarabeth Berman, CEO, American Journalism Project • Elizabeth Green, founder and CEO of Chalkbeat, co-founder and co-chair of the board, American Journalism Project • Nishant Lalwani, managing director, Luminate, United Kingdom • Dele Olojede, founder and host, Africa In the World, South Africa ________________________________________________________________________ Mallary Tenore Hi, everyone, welcome. I'm Mallary Tenore from the Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas, and I'm delighted that you're here today for the last day of ISOJ online. I'm very excited to be introducing this workshop. Now, before we do, I just want to share a few housekeeping notes. One is that we are going to be interpreting this workshop into Spanish. So if you want to tune in to the Spanish, you can just click that little interpretation globe in the meeting options below and click the Spanish channel, and you'll be able to hear it in Spanish. I also want to remind you that we are going to be streaming this on to YouTube, both in English and in Spanish. So we'll close the links to those YouTube channels in the chat feature of Zoom. So if at any point you have any technical issues with Zoom, you can always tune in to the YouTube stream. And lastly, I just want to encourage you to use the hashtag #ISOJ2020 to share highlights from this workshop. And you can also post questions for the workshop speakers in the chat feature in Zoom.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulitzer Prize Winners and Finalists
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • The International Response to Genocide in Rwanda
    NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 22 Number 3 Article 4 Summer 1997 It Happened and it Can Happen Again: The International Response to Genocide in Rwanda Dorinda Lea Peacock Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Recommended Citation Dorinda L. Peacock, It Happened and it Can Happen Again: The International Response to Genocide in Rwanda, 22 N.C. J. INT'L L. 899 (1996). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol22/iss3/4 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. It Happened and it Can Happen Again: The International Response to Genocide in Rwanda Cover Page Footnote International Law; Commercial Law; Law This comments is available in North Carolina Journal of International Law: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/ vol22/iss3/4 COMMENTS "It Happened and It Can Happen Again": The International Response to Genocide in Rwanda I. Introduction ......................................................................... 900 II. W hat is G enocide? ................................... .. .. .. .. ................... 903 III. The Jewish Holocaust of World War II .............................. 906 IV. The Genocide in Rwanda .................................................... 911 A. Rwanda's Colonial History ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coke Vs. Pepsi: the Cola Wars in South Africa During the Anti- Apartheid Era
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History 7-8-2009 Coke vs. Pepsi: The Cola Wars in South Africa during The Anti- Apartheid Era John Kirby Spivey Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Spivey, John Kirby, "Coke vs. Pepsi: The Cola Wars in South Africa during The Anti-Apartheid Era." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2009. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/35 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COKE VS. PEPSI: THE COLA WARS IN SOUTH AFRICA DURING THE ANTI- APARTHEID ERA by J. KIRBY SPIVEY Under the Direction of Dr. Jared Poley ABSTRACT This thesis looks at the actions of Coca-Cola and Pepsi in South Africa during both the anti- apartheid movement and the post-apartheid era. The processes which led to those actions, both corporations’ removal of their presence in South Africa, the effects this had on South Africa, and their reemergence in a post-apartheid state are examined. It will be shown that, despite the public relations campaigns of both Coke and Pepsi, far more importance was placed on their products’ profitability than the well-being of the black Africans who produced, delivered, or consumed the soft drinks. However, both companies found their actions during the 1980s to affect their success after the fall of apartheid.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Alternative' Media and the Institutional Journalistic Practices of Print Journalists in Nigeria Moti
    Negotiating inclusion: new 'alternative' media and the institutional journalistic practices of print journalists in Nigeria Motilola Olufenwa Akinfemisoye A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Central Lancashire, for the award of Doctor of Philosophy November 2015 Student Declaration I declare that while registered as a candidate for the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution. I declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work. Signature of Candidate Type of Award Doctor of Philosophy School Journalism and Media ii ABSTRACT This study uses an ethnographic approach (in-depth interviews and newsrooms observations) combined with Critical Discourse Analysis to closely interrogate how journalists in four Nigerian print newsrooms; The Punch, Vanguard, Nigerian Tribune and Guardian, appropriate ‘alternative media’ content and new media technologies in their newsmaking practices. The choice of these four newsrooms enables a detailed reading of how the process of appropriating new media technologies and alternative media content takes place in Nigerian print newsrooms. The study explores how and whether (or not) these appropriations are impacting on institutional practices of Nigerian print journalists. It also sheds light on the spaces which new media technologies negotiate in these newsrooms and how these journalists negotiate the appropriation of alternative media content. Beyond the everyday newsmaking practices, the study uses the reporting of two key events; the Nigerian elections of 2011 and the Occupy Nigeria protests of 2012 to show how journalists in Nigerian print newsrooms negotiate their appropriation of alternative media content and new media technologies in reporting key events.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary
    UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR NON-JUDICIAL NOMINEES PUBLIC 1. Name: Full name (include any former names used). Dawn Elizabeth Johnsen 2. Position: State the position for which you have been nominated. Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel 3. Address: List current office address. If city and state of residence differs from your place of employment, please list the city and state where you currently reside. Indiana University Maurer School of Law-Bloomington, 211 S. Indiana Ave., Bloomington, IN 47405 4. Birthplace: State date and place of birth. August 14, 1961; Manhasset, New York 5. Marital Status: (include name of spouse, and names of spouse pre-marriage, if different). List spouse’s occupation, employer’s name and business address(es). Please, also indicate the number of dependent children. John Mark Hamilton President (community development finance executive) City First Enterprises 1436 U St. NW Washington, DC 20009 We have two dependent children. 6. Education: List in reverse chronological order, listing most recent first, each college, law school, or any other institution of higher education attended and indicate for each the dates of attendance, whether a degree was received, and the date each degree was received. Yale Law School, J.D., 1986, attended 1983-1986 Yale University, B.A., 1983, attended 1979-1983 7. Employment Record: List in reverse chronological order, listing most recent first, all governmental agencies, business or professional corporations, companies, firms, or other enterprises, partnerships, institutions or organizations, non-profit or otherwise, with which you have been affiliated as an officer, director, partner, proprietor, or employee since graduation from college, whether or not you received payment for your services.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulitzer Prize Winners Biography Or Autobiography Year Winner 1917
    A Monthly Newsletter of Ibadan Book Club – December Edition www.ibadanbookclub.webs.com, www.ibadanbookclub.wordpress.com E-mail:[email protected], [email protected] Pulitzer Prize Winners Biography or Autobiography Year Winner 1917 Julia Ward Howe, Laura E. Richards and Maude Howe Elliott assisted by Florence Howe Hall 1918 Benjamin Franklin, Self-Revealed, William Cabell Bruce 1919 The Education of Henry Adams, Henry Adams 1920 The Life of John Marshall, Albert J. Beveridge 1921 The Americanization of Edward Bok, Edward Bok 1922 A Daughter of the Middle Border, Hamlin Garland 1923 The Life and Letters of Walter H. Page, Burton J. Hendrick 1924 From Immigrant to Inventor, Michael Idvorsky Pupin 1925 Barrett Wendell and His Letters, M.A. DeWolfe Howe 1926 The Life of Sir William Osler, Harvey Cushing 1927 Whitman, Emory Holloway 1928 The American Orchestra and Theodore Thomas, Charles Edward Russell 1929 The Training of an American: The Earlier Life and Letters of Walter H. Page, Burton J. Hendrick 1930 The Raven, Marquis James 1931 Charles W. Eliot, Henry James 1932 Theodore Roosevelt, Henry F. Pringle 1933 Grover Cleveland, Allan Nevins 1934 John Hay, Tyler Dennett 1935 R.E. Lee, Douglas S. Freeman 1936 The Thought and Character of William James, Ralph Barton Perry 1937 Hamilton Fish, Allan Nevins 1938 Pedlar's Progress, Odell Shepard, Andrew Jackson, Marquis James 1939 Benjamin Franklin, Carl Van Doren 1940 Woodrow Wilson, Life and Letters, Vol. VII and VIII, Ray Stannard Baker 1941 Jonathan Edwards, Ola Elizabeth Winslow 1942 Crusader in Crinoline, Forrest Wilson 1943 Admiral of the Ocean Sea, Samuel Eliot Morison 1944 The American Leonardo: The Life of Samuel F.B.
    [Show full text]