DOCSLIB.ORG

Emera Brunswick Argument-In-Chief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Emera Brunswick Argument-In-Chief EMERA BRUNSWICK PIPELINE COMPANY LTD. NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD BRUNSWICK PIPELINE APPLICATION HEARING ORDER GH-1-2006 EMERA BRUNSWICK ARGUMENT-IN-CHIEF DECEMBER 1, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................1 2. BACKGROUND .........................................................................................................3 3. PURPOSE, NEED AND JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT .................................4 3.1 "C ANADA NEEDS THE BRUNSWICK PIPELINE "........................................................4 3.1.1 Replacement Supply.............................................................................5 3.1.2 Demand Growth....................................................................................6 3.2 IMPACT ON OTHER PIPELINES AND SHIPPERS –COMMERCIAL STAKEHOLDERS .........7 3.3 ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY - MARKETS & SUPPLY - ALTERNATIVES .............................8 3.4 TIMING ............................................................................................................15 3.5 THE PROJECT MAKES GAS AVAILABLE TO THE MARITIME CANADA MARKET .........15 3.6 OTHER PROJECT BENEFITS ...............................................................................16 4. SAFETY ...................................................................................................................17 4.1 THE BRUNSWICK PIPELINE IS STATE -OF -THE -ART AND MEETS OR EXCEEDS CODE ..............................................................................................................17 4.2 RISK – PROBABILITY & CONSEQUENCE ..............................................................17 4.3 COMPARABLE PIPELINES ...................................................................................22 4.4 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................23 5. CONSULTATION .....................................................................................................23 5.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................23 5.2 LANDOWNERS ..................................................................................................24 5.3 THE GENERAL PUBLIC ......................................................................................25 5.4 GOVERNMENTS ................................................................................................26 5.5 ABORIGINAL GROUPS .......................................................................................26 5.6 REGULATORY AGENCIES ...................................................................................27 5.7 OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES ............................................................................28 5.8 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................28 6. ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION..................................................................30 6.1 IMPACTS ON CITY OF SAINT JOHN INFRASTRUCTURE ...........................................30 6.2 BLASTING DISTURBANCES AND DAMAGE ............................................................30 6.3 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................30 7. OPERATIONS..........................................................................................................31 7.1 EMERGENCY RESPONSE ...................................................................................31 7.1.1 General ...............................................................................................31 7.1.2 Areas with Limited Access Points .......................................................32 7.2 CLOSURE OF LINE BLOCK VALVES .....................................................................32 7.3 SECURITY MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................32 7.4 SYSTEM INTEGRITY – IN-LINE INSPECTION FREQUENCY .......................................33 7.5 ATV ACCESS CONTROL MEASURES ..................................................................34 7.6 GAS QUALITY ...................................................................................................35 7.7 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................35 8. ENVIRONMENT.......................................................................................................35 8.1 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES ...................................................................35 8.1.1 "Alternatives To"..................................................................................35 8.1.2 "Alternative Means".............................................................................36 8.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .........................................................................40 8.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION ............................................................................42 8.3.1 Introduction .........................................................................................42 8.3.2 Archaeology ........................................................................................42 8.3.3 Air Quality ...........................................................................................42 8.3.4 Blasting ...............................................................................................42 8.3.5 Contaminated Sites.............................................................................43 8.3.6 Noise...................................................................................................43 8.3.7 Watercourse Crossings.......................................................................44 8.3.8 Wetlands and Rare Species................................................................44 8.4 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................45 9. ROCKWOOD PARK ................................................................................................45 10. CORRIDOR SELECTION ........................................................................................46 11. PART IV MATTERS .................................................................................................47 11.1 GROUP 2 STATUS .............................................................................................48 11.2 PRECEDENT AND TOLL AGREEMENTS .................................................................48 11.3 ACCESS – INTERCONNECTION POLICY ................................................................49 11.4 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................50 12. LANDS ISSUES.......................................................................................................50 13. IRRELEVANCE AND LACK OF PROBATIVE VALUE OF ANADARKO’S EVIDENCE ...............................................................................................................51 14. COMMENTS ON DRAFT CERTIFICATE CONDITIONS (EXHIBIT A-40)...............54 14.1 DRAFT CONDITION 1 – GENERAL .......................................................................54 14.2 DRAFT CONDITION 2 – GENERAL .......................................................................54 14.3 DRAFT CONDITION 3 – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN ................................54 14.4 DRAFT CONDITION 4 – ENVIRONMENTAL FOLLOW -UP PROGRAMS ........................54 14.5 DRAFT CONDITION 5 – TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS .....54 14.6 DRAFT CONDITION 6 – CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE .............................................54 14.7 DRAFT CONDITION 7 – CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PROGRAM ............................54 14.8 DRAFT CONDITION 8 – ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES AND MONITORING PLANS ........55 14.9 DRAFT CONDITION 9 – ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLANS .........................................55 14.10 DRAFT CONDITION 10 – CONSTRUCTION MANUALS .............................................55 14.11 DRAFT CONDITION 11 – INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES .........................................55 14.12 DRAFT CONDITION 12 – CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTS ............................55 14.13 DRAFT CONDITION 13 – HDD NOISE MANAGEMENT PLAN ...................................55 14.14 DRAFT CONDITION 14 – SAINT JOHN RIVER CROSSING .......................................55 14.15 DRAFT CONDITION 15 – ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HERITAGE RESOURCE DISCOVERY .....................................................................................................55 14.16 DRAFT CONDITION 16 – EMERGENCY PROCEDURES MANUAL ..............................55 14.17 DRAFT CONDITION 17 – CONSULTATION ON EMERGENCY PROCEDURES MANUAL ..56 14.18 DRAFT CONDITION 18 – CONDITION COMPLIANCE BY A COMPANY OFFICER ..........56 14.19 DRAFT CONDITION 19 – EMERGENCY RESPONSE EXERCISE ................................56 14.20 DRAFT CONDITION 20 – EMERGENCY RESPONSE EXERCISE PROGRAM ................56 14.21 DRAFT CONDITION 21 – POST -CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS ..........56 14.22 DRAFT CONDITION 22 – ENVIRONMENTAL FOLLOW -UP PROGRAM REPORTS .........56 14.23 DRAFT CONDITION 23 – CERTIFICATE EXPIRATION ..............................................56 15. CONCLUSION .........................................................................................................56 Emera Brunswick Pipeline Company Ltd. December 1, 2006 GH-1-2006
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stepping Stones": Women and Political Rights
    "Stepping Stones": Women and Political Rights n 1784 an Order-in-Council at the Court of St. James in I London created the province of New Brunswick by separating the newly defined territory from the province of Nova Scotia. An influx of Loyalist refugees a year earlier had so augmented the population of the region, already peopled with Micmacs, Maliseets and reestablished Acadians, and had so increased demands for land grants that the colonial government in Halifax found the region difficult to administer efficiently, especially at such a distance. Some of the newly arrived Loyalists, impatient with the slowness of the Halifax government and displeased with sharing Nova Scotia with peoples they considered less loyal than themselves to the British crown, began agitating for their own administration. England was convinced. A new government was in order. A new province.' Born not of revolution - either military or ideological - the administrative creation hardly signaled an attempt at building a wholly new society. Rather, it reaffirmed the continued presence of English legal and political tradition in the region. This tradition, distinguished like other European legal and political systems by values based on male dominance of family and state,2 was to shape the lives of women and men of diverse cultures now living in the new province.3 What did the creation of the province signify in political terms to the women of the province - to the original women, theMicmacs and the Maliseets; to the reestablished Acadian women; to the recently established Black women;4 and to the newly arrived and diverse Loyalist women? Although the question requires us to evaluate the situation of 18th century women with 20th century criteria, we can nevertheless affirm that for even the most elitely placed of these women, the establishment of a new political order in the region did not improve or even alter women's status.
    [Show full text]
  • PO T of the CHIEF CTORAL O FCER DES ELECTIO
    THIRTY-FIRST GENERAL EL£CTION OCTOBER 13. 1987 PO T OF THE CHIEF CTORAL o FCER PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK DES ELECTIO DU WIC SUR LE TRENTE ET UNIEMES ELECTIONS GENERALES TENUES LE 13 OCTOBRE 1987 TO THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF NEW BRUNSWICK MR. SPEAKER: I have the honour to submit to you the Return of the General Election held on October 13th, 1987. The Thirtieth Legislative Assembly was dissolved on August 29th, 1987 and Writs ordering a General Election for October 13th, 1987 were issued on August 29th, 1987, and made returnable on October 26th, 1987. Four By-Elections have been held since the General Election of 1982 and have been submitted under separate cover, plus being listed in this Report. This Office is proposing that consideration be given to having the Chief Electoral Officer and his or her staff come under the Legislature or a Committee appointed by the Legislature made up of all Parties represented in the House. The other proposal being that a specific period of time be attached to the appointments of Returning Officers as found in Section 9 of the Elections Act. Respectfully submitted, February 15, 1988 SCOVIL S. HOYT Acting Chief Electoral Officer A L'ASSEMBLEE LEGISLATIVE DU NOUVEAU-BRUNSWICK MONSIEUR LE PRESIDENT, J'ai I'honneur de vous presenter les resultats des elections generales qui se sont tenues Ie 13 octobre 1987. La trentieme Assemblee legislative a ete dissoute Ie 29 Staff of Chief Elec aoOt 1987 et les brefs ordonnant la tenue d'elections Personnel du bUrE generales Ie 13 octobre 1987 ont ete em is Ie 29 aout 1987 et Election Schedule rapportes Ie 260ctobre 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • The New-York Historical Society Library Department of Prints, Photographs, and Architectural Collections
    Guide to the Geographic File ca 1800-present (Bulk 1850-1950) PR20 The New-York Historical Society 170 Central Park West New York, NY 10024 Descriptive Summary Title: Geographic File Dates: ca 1800-present (bulk 1850-1950) Abstract: The Geographic File includes prints, photographs, and newspaper clippings of street views and buildings in the five boroughs (Series III and IV), arranged by location or by type of structure. Series I and II contain foreign views and United States views outside of New York City. Quantity: 135 linear feet (160 boxes; 124 drawers of flat files) Call Phrase: PR 20 Note: This is a PDF version of a legacy finding aid that has not been updated recently and is provided “as is.” It is key-word searchable and can be used to identify and request materials through our online request system (AEON). PR 000 2 The New-York Historical Society Library Department of Prints, Photographs, and Architectural Collections PR 020 GEOGRAPHIC FILE Series I. Foreign Views Series II. American Views Series III. New York City Views (Manhattan) Series IV. New York City Views (Other Boroughs) Processed by Committee Current as of May 25, 2006 PR 020 3 Provenance Material is a combination of gifts and purchases. Individual dates or information can be found on the verso of most items. Access The collection is open to qualified researchers. Portions of the collection that have been photocopied or microfilmed will be brought to the researcher in that format; microfilm can be made available through Interlibrary Loan. Photocopying Photocopying will be undertaken by staff only, and is limited to twenty exposures of stable, unbound material per day.
    [Show full text]
  • New Idea 67-18, Jumbo Puzzle Book, Winners List $1,799 WING ARM
    New Idea 67-18, Jumbo Puzzle Book, Winners List $1,799 WING ARM CHAIR G Bates, Greenwell Point, NSW $3,427 SEWING PACK C Hulbert, Belmont, Vic 2 X $1,199 KITCHEN APPLIANCE PACK H Dezius, Glenwood, NSW; J Fackerell, Fairview Park, SA $875 MENS WATCH A Parmenter, Cooloola Cove, Qld 50 X $49 MARBLE CHEESE BOARD G Behr, Marsfield, NSW; L Bournels, Kurralta Park, SA; K Boyle, Belmont, Vic; S Brenna, Coramba, NSW; V Burk, Port Augusta, SA; T Carne, Denmark, WA; C Chellew, Alice Springs, NT; M Clark, Orange, NSW; K Clarke, Springfield Lakes, Qld; T Clarke, Walkerston, Qld; M Dumas, Castle Hill, NSW; J Dunn, Hope Valley, SA; E Flint, Bellmere, Qld; V Fox, Salisbury North, SA; K Gray, Mollymook Beach, NSW; R Haas, Bathurst, NSW; B Hehir, Deniliquin, NSW; M Hopson, Kiama, NSW; P Ledlin, Randwick, NSW; L Lillywhite, Jindalee, Qld; D Lindenbaur, Toowoomba, Qld; L Lovejoy, Bundaberg, Qld; R Lutchinson, Teralba, NSW; J McBean, Kandos, NSW; D McCarthy, Taree, NSW; T McCrea, Moss Vale, NSW; J McLouglin, Glebe NSW; K Neighbour, Port Lincoln, SA; S Nott, Dunedoo, NSW; S O'Donnell, Northmead, NSW; L O'Garey, Somerset, Tas; J Page, Wingham, NSW; B Pank, Loganholme, Qld; T Papponetti, Chiswick, NSW; P Pirtsios, Noble Park, Vic; G Poli, Currambine, WA; S Posselt, Waurn Ponds, Vic; H Pritchard, Hobartville, NSW; C Roach, Glossodia, NSW; A Rodgers, Townsville, Qld; E Sindholt, Herberton, Qld; D Spittel, Hampton Park, Vic; P Sutton, Nuriootpa, SA; I Taylor, Bracken Ridge, Qld; E Terry, Saint John’s Park, NSW; D Umback, Mildura, Vic; M Wallis, Rochedale South,
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Procedings
    Maritime Conference The United Church of Canada The 91st Annual Meeting Sackville, New Brunswick May 26-29, 2016 MINUTES OF CONFERENCE RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Ninety-First Maritime Conference Meeting 134 May 26, 2016 Sackville, NB NINETY FIRST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE MARITIME CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA FIRST SESSION – THURSDAY EVENING May 26, 2016 Time and Place and Constitution of the Court: The 91st Annual Meeting of Maritime Conference, United Church of Canada, began at 6:25 p.m., on Thursday, May 26, 2016, in the Tantramar Veterans Memorial Civic Centre, Sackville, New Brunswick. The meeting was called to order in the name of Jesus, the Christ, the Head of the Church, by the President, Rev. Matthew Fillier. The Christ candle was lit. Constitutional Motions: David Hewitt / Nan Corrigan moved that the constitutional motions as printed in Section 1, Reports to the Conference 2016, page 16-17, including the Conference Roll, Quorum and Bounds, agenda, adoption of minutes, and reports not requiring further action, including those in the registration package be adopted. MOTION CARRIED Reference and Counsel: David Hewitt / Steve Berube moved that Mary White and Rachel Campbell be named as Reference and Counsel for the 91st meeting of Maritime Conference 2016. MOTION CARRIED Introduction of Ecumenical Guests: The Executive Secretary introduced the ecumenical and interfaith guests, Mr. Rick Haddad, Anglican Diocese of Fredericton, Rev. Lisa Vaughn, Anglican Diocese of Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island, Rev. Jeffrey Lackie, The Presbyterian Synod of the Atlantic Provinces, Rev. Dr. Frank Guinta Jr., Convention of Atlantic Baptist Churches, Rev. Charles Broderick, Moncton Archdiocese, and Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011/B/49 Annual Returns Received Between 07-Oct-2011 and 13-Oct-2011 Index of Submission Types
    ISSUE ID: 2011/B/49 ANNUAL RETURNS RECEIVED BETWEEN 07-OCT-2011 AND 13-OCT-2011 INDEX OF SUBMISSION TYPES B1B - REPLACEMENT ANNUAL RETURN B1C - ANNUAL RETURN - GENERAL B1AU - B1 WITH AUDITORS REPORT B1 - ANNUAL RETURN - NO ACCOUNTS CRO GAZETTE, FRIDAY, 14th October 2011 3 ANNUAL RETURNS RECEIVED BETWEEN 07-OCT-2011 AND 13-OCT-2011 Company Company Documen Date Of Company Company Documen Date Of Number Name t Receipt Number Name t Receipt 1757 DROGHEDA AND DISTRICT CHAMBER B1C 16/09/2011 22369 WILLIAM H. BYRNE & SON B1AU 13/10/2011 LIMITED 22375 THE SWAN LAKE DEVELOPMENTS B1C 10/10/2011 2079 SICON LIMITED B1C 06/10/2011 COMPANY LIMITED 3229 THE BENSON BOX COMPANY (IRELAND) B1C 09/09/2011 22976 C.C.P. LIMITED B1C 03/10/2011 LIMITED 23839 ARGOSY TRUST COMPANY LIMITED B1C 12/10/2011 3411 P. BOURKE & COMPANY, LIMITED B1C 16/09/2011 24232 HARRINGTONS CONFECTIONERS B1C 05/10/2011 3997 SIAC CONSTRUCTION LIMITED B1C 29/09/2011 LIMITED 7138 ROBERT J. GOFF & CO. PUBLIC LIMITED B1C 15/09/2011 24478 J.A. BOWES & SON LIMITED B1C 27/09/2011 COMPANY 24503 T. M. F. LIMITED B1C 07/09/2011 7187 HERGALL TOBACCO LIMITED B1C 11/10/2011 24889 CALTEX (IRELAND) LIMITED B1C 13/10/2011 7313 CARTON BROS., B1AU 03/10/2011 24899 SAINT JOHN'S PARK ASSOCIATION B1C 05/10/2011 7583 JUVERNA PRESS, LIMITED B1C 06/10/2011 LIMITED 7640 ADELPHI-CARLTON LIMITED B1C 03/10/2011 24927 GROGAN BROTHERS LIMITED B1C 13/10/2011 9123 THE HAMMOND LANE METAL COMPANY, B1C 21/09/2011 25018 MACLOCHLAINN (ROADMARKINGS) B1C 06/10/2011 LIMITED LIMITED 9124 ST.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section J
    J (Computer program language) J.G.L. Collection (Australia) J. R. (Fictitious character : Bell) (Not Subd Geog) BT Object-oriented programming languages BT Painting—Private collections—Australia UF J. R. Weatherford (Fictitious character) J (Locomotive) (Not Subd Geog) J.G. Strijdomdam (South Africa) Weatherford, J. R. (Fictitious character) BT Locomotives USE Pongolapoort Dam (South Africa) Weatherford, James Royce (Fictitious J & R Landfill (Ill.) J. Hampton Robb Residence (New York, N.Y.) character) UF J and R Landfill (Ill.) USE James Hampden and Cornelia Van Rensselaer J. R. Weatherford (Fictitious character) J&R Landfill (Ill.) Robb House (New York, N.Y.) USE J. R. (Fictitious character : Bell) BT Sanitary landfills—Illinois J. Herbert W. Small Federal Building and United States J’rai (Southeast Asian people) J. & W. Seligman and Company Building (New York, Courthouse (Elizabeth City, N.C.) USE Jarai (Southeast Asian people) N.Y.) UF Small Federal Building and United States J. Roy Rowland Federal Courthouse (Dublin, Ga.) USE Banca Commerciale Italiana Building (New Courthouse (Elizabeth City, N.C.) USE J. Roy Rowland United States Courthouse York, N.Y.) BT Courthouses—North Carolina (Dublin, Ga.) J 29 (Jet fighter plane) Public buildings—North Carolina J. Roy Rowland United States Courthouse (Dublin, Ga.) USE Saab 29 (Jet fighter plane) J-holomorphic curves UF J. Roy Rowland Federal Courthouse (Dublin, J.A. Ranch (Tex.) USE Pseudoholomorphic curves Ga.) BT Ranches—Texas J. I. Case tractors Rowland United States Courthouse (Dublin, J. Alfred Prufrock (Fictitious character) USE Case tractors Ga.) USE Prufrock, J. Alfred (Fictitious character) J.J. Glessner House (Chicago, Ill.) BT Courthouses—Georgia J and R Landfill (Ill.) USE Glessner House (Chicago, Ill.) J-Sharp (Computer program language) USE J & R Landfill (Ill.) J.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Electoral Districts Circonscriptions Electorales Proposees ,
    Representation and Electoral District La commission sur Ia representation Boundaries Commission et Ia d~limitation des circonscrlptions aectorales 364 Argyle St. 364, rue Argyle Fredericton NB Fredericton (N.-B.) E3B5Hl E3B 5Hl Tel: (506) 457-7333 Tel.: (506) 457-7333 Fax: (506) 457·7343 Telec.: (506) 457-7343 I Proposed electoral districts Brief descriptions Circonscriptions electorales proposees Breves descriptions MAY/MAl 1993 I •• Restigouche No. 1 Restigouche No.1 ADDENDUM ADDENDUM 1. This proposed district La circonscription includes all of the proposee inclut la current district known as totalite de la Restigouche-West. It is circonscription actuelle that part of Restigouche connue sous Ie nom de county, South of Tide­ Restigouche-Ouest. C'est Head, Atholville and la partie du comte de Campbellton. It also Restigouche situee au Sud includes the remaining de Tide-Head, Atholville part of Mount Carleton et campbellton. La provincial park that is nouvelle circonscription situated in inclut aussi la partie du Northumberland County. Mont Carleton qui est situee dans Ie comte de Northumberland. Restigouche No 1 new name/nouveau nom DESCRIPTION: DESCRIPTION: This district includes all that part of Cette drconscription comprend les Restigouche County which paroisses de Saint-Quentin, Grimmer, encompasses the parishes of St. Eldon et la majeure partie de la Quentin, Grimmer, Eldon and the paroisse de Addington, al'exception greater portion of the parish of des villages de Tide Head et de Addington with the exception of Atholville. Elle comprend egalement Tide Head and Atholville. It also la totalite du pare provincial du Mont includes the Mount Carleton provin­ Carleton. cial park.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Activities 2016
    Legislative Activities 2016 New Brunswick Prepared for The Honourable Chris Collins Speaker of the Legislative Assembly New Brunswick October 20, 2017 The Honourable Chris Collins Speaker of the Legislative Assembly Room 31, Legislative Building Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5H1 Dear Mr. Speaker: I have the honour of submitting this, the twenty-eighth annual report of Legislative Activities, for the year ended December 31, 2016. Respectfully submitted, Donald J. Forestell Clerk of the Legislative Assembly TABLE OF CONTENTS YEAR IN REVIEW............................................................................................................... 1 HIGHLIGHTS ...................................................................................................................... 3 MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Role of Speaker ............................................................................................................ 5 Role of Members .......................................................................................................... 5 House Activity ............................................................................................................... 6 House Statistics ............................................................................................................ 9 Members of the Legislative Assembly, as of December 31, 2016 ............................. 10 Committee Activity ...................................................................................................... 12 CITIZEN
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: Open Space
    Chapter 5: Open Space A. INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses the potential impacts of the Proposed Action on open space resources. Open space is defined by the 2012 City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual as publicly accessible, publicly or privately owned land that operates or is available for leisure, play, or sport, or serves to protect or enhance the natural environment. According to the CEQR Technical Manual, an open space assessment should be conducted if a project would have a direct effect on open space, such as eliminating or altering a public open space, or an indirect effect, such as when new population overburdens available open space. The Proposed Action would not directly displace any existing public open space and would include open space in the Rezoning Area. However, the Proposed Action would also introduce substantial new resident and worker populations to the study area that would create new demands for open space. Therefore, an open space assessment was conducted to determine whether the Proposed Action would result in any significant adverse impacts to open space resources. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS DIRECT EFFECTS The Proposed Action would not remove or alter any existing publicly accessible open spaces, nor would it result in any significant adverse impacts on any open spaces due to noise or air quality. As described in Chapter 6, “Shadows,” Projected Development Site 2 would result in up to approximately 2 to 4 hours of new shadows on Trump SoHo Plaza and SoHo Square in the Rezoning Area, which would result in significant adverse shadow impacts to these open spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    1 JOURNALS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK From the 25th day of November to the 19th day of December, 2008 the 17th day of March to the 3rd day of April, 2009 the 14th day of April to the 1st day of May, 2009 the 12th day of May to the 19th day of June, 2009 the 17th day of November 2009 Third Session of the Fifty-Sixth Legislative Assembly Fredericton, N.B. 2008-2009 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Third Session of the Fifty-Sixth Legislative Assembly Speaker: the Honourable Roy Boudreau Constituency Member Residence Albert Wayne Steeves Lower Coverdale Bathurst Hon. Brian Kenny Bathurst Campbellton-Restigouche Centre Hon. Roy Boudreau Campbellton Caraquet Hon. Hédard Albert St. Simon Carleton Dale Graham Centreville Centre-Péninsule—Saint-Sauveur Hon. Denis Landry Trudel Charlotte-Campobello Antoon (Tony) Huntjens St. Stephen Charlotte-The Isles Hon. Rick Doucet St. George Dalhousie-Restigouche East Hon. Donald Arseneault Black Point Dieppe Centre-Lewisville Cy (Richard) Leblanc Dieppe Edmundston—Saint-Basile Madeleine Dubé Edmundston Fredericton-Fort Nashwaak Hon. Kelly Lamrock Fredericton Fredericton-Lincoln Hon. Greg Byrne, Q.C. Fredericton Fredericton-Nashwaaksis Thomas J. (T.J.) Burke, Q.C. Fredericton Fredericton-Silverwood Hon. Richard (Rick) Miles Fredericton Fundy-River Valley Hon. Jack Keir Grand Bay-Westfield Grand Falls— Drummond—Saint-André Hon. Ronald Ouellette Grand Falls Grand Lake-Gagetown Eugene McGinley, Q.C. Chipman Hampton-Kings Bev Harrison Hampton Kent Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOTOURISM in the WIDER CARIBBEAN REGION: an ASSESSMENT Table of Contents
    CEP Technical Report: 31 1994 ECOTOURISM IN THE WIDER CARIBBEAN REGION: AN ASSESSMENT Table of Contents Summary -Background -Methodology and scope of the study -Structure of the report -Note I. Synthesis A. Ecotourism: Scope and Definitions 1. Initial considerations 2. Definitions a. Ecotourism b. Ecotourists B. Analysis and Conclusions 1. The Practice and Concept of Ecotourism 2. Significance and Impact of Tourism 3. Ecotourism and Protected Areas a. Importance of Protected Areas b. Capacity of Protected Areas 4. Context and Status of Ecotourism a. Institutional Factors b. Approach to Planning c. Priority Requirements d. Achievements and Failures of Ecotourism C. Guidelines for the Development of Ecotourism 1. Useful References (Documents) 2. Basic Premises 3. Some Strategic Proposals II. Results of the Survey A. The General Context 1. Contribution of the Tourism Sector to the Economy a. Contribution to gross Domestic Product b. Contribution to Employment c. Contribution to Foreign Exchange Earnings 2. Hotel Capacity and Number of Visitors a. Number of Rooms and Occupancy Levels b. All-inclusive Resorts c. Visitors Arrivals B. Ecotourism C. Protected Areas 1. Protected Terrestrial Areas 2. Coastal Protected Areas 3. Marine Protected Areas D. Non-Protected Areas E. Frequency of Visitors and Areas Most Visited F. Institutions, Standards and Planning 1. Organizations involved in Ecotourism 2. Criteria for Regulating Tourism and the Environment 3. Planning G. Current Status of Ecotourism 1. Priority Requirements 2. Local Facilities and Experience in each country for Training in Ecotourism 3. Achievements and Failures of Ecotourism III. Case Studies A. Netherlands Antilles: Bonaire 1. Ecotourism in Bonaire - Summary 2.
    [Show full text]