1/17/2012 1 Avian Systematics Class Aves Avian Systematics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1/17/2012 1 Avian Systematics Class Aves Avian Systematics 1/17/2012 Class Aves Avian Systematics • Subclass Sauriurae • Systematics deals with evolutionary – Infraclass Archaeornithes - Archaeopteryx relationships among organisms. Allied – Infraclass Enantiornithes - Opposite birds with classification (or taxonomy). • Subclass Ornithurae • All birds are classified within the single – Infraclass Odontornithes - New World Class Aves toothed birds – 2 Subclasses – Infraclass Neornithes – 4 Infraclasses • Superorder Paleognathae - ratites and tinamous • Superorder Neognathae - all other birds Avian Systematics • Living birds comprise approximately: – 30 Orders – 193 Families – 2,099 Genera – 9,700 species Avian Phylogeny based on Feduccia (1995) 1 1/17/2012 Avian Systematics Avian Systematics • In practice, it can be difficult to delineate • Basic unit of classification = Species species from subspecies (geographical – Biological Species Concept = a species is variants) by both definitions of species. a group of similar looking individuals that are capable of interbreeding successfully • 2 Schools of Thought on differentiating – Molecular Species Concept = a species is species: a group of organisms that are diagnosably – Lumpers = tend to group similar forms into different genetically from other groups of a single species organisms – Splitters = tend to differentiate species when only minor variation present Avian Systematics Bases for Classification • The goal of systematics (and • Morphology = physical characteristics classification) is to provide a correct – historical method by which phylogenies phylogeny (evolutionary family tree) for derived organisms. – still a common method, particularly for • Avian systematics deals with how the fossil birds phylogeny of modern birds is • Biochemical Evidence = closely related established. birds should have more similar genes than more distantly related birds • Supplementary Evidence 2 1/17/2012 Morphology Morphology • Cladistics = a method of using a number of • Physical characteristics used for characters to establish a cladogram, which establishing phylogenies must be presumably outlines the evolutionary shared derived characters, rather than relationships among species based on these primitive characters. characters. • If two birds share a derived character, • Caution: a cladogram is only as good as the we can hypothesize that they shared a characters that are put into it, so careful choice must be used in entering characters common ancestor with that same into the model. derived character. Morphology • Morphological evidence alone is not sufficient to derive correct phylogenies. • One problem is convergent evolution = two species which are not closely related may look similar because they are adapted to similar lifestyles or environments. •Examples: – Auks (N hemisphere) vs. Penguins (S hemisphere) – New World Warblers and Australian Thornbills 3 1/17/2012 Penguins – southern Hemisphere Auks – northern Hemisphere New World Warblers Australian Warblers/Thornbills Biochemical Evidence Biochemical Evidence • Protein Electorphoresis = method of • DNA/DNA Hybridization = also an attempt to separating proteins in an electric field measure amount of genetic similarity. More depending on their charge, which reflects direct than using proteins. their amino acid sequence. – Fragments of single stranded DNA from 2 species • Ideally, this should measure the genetic associated under specific conditions. Forms 2- distance between 2 birds, because the amino stranded hybrid complex. acid sequence is dependent on the DNA – Hybrid complex then heated until dissociation. sequence. – Higher numbers of shared base pairs lead to increased thermal stability, so the more similar the • Not used much anymore. DNA, the higher the heat required for dissociation. 4 1/17/2012 Biochemical Evidence Biochemical Evidence • Problems with DNA/DNA Hybridization • DNA Sequencing = measures genetic – Differences may reflect adaptive radiation (and similarity of a portion of the genome (usually associated rapid DNA change) rather than distant certain specific genes) directly. ancestry • Measures nucleotide sequences of certain – Natural selection acts on phenotype not on genes directly (often use mitochondrial DNA) genotype (convergence is also possible within DNA) • Most direct measure of genetic similarity and – There is some argument over how accurately the common method for deriving phylogenies thermal stability reflects actual DNA sequences. currently. • DNA/DNA hybridization not used much • Usually will use several genes to verify anymore. phylogeny. Supplementary Evidence Supplementary Evidence • Behavior = related species should show • Karyotypes = shapes and numbers of similar unique (derived) behaviors chromosomes. Again, should be most similar – Example: New World Vultures historically between closely related species. assigned to Falconiformes based on morphology. • Ectoparasites = external parasites are often Share unique habit of urinating on legs to increase specific for a particular species of bird. heat loss when hot with storks (Ciconiiformes). DNA evidence supports relationship with storks. Closely related birds should have similar ectoparasites since they evolved along with • Biogeography = ranges of closely related the birds. forms should be geographically closer than more distantly related forms. • TAKE HOME = systematics is not a static science, but is dynamic, changing as new information comes to light. 5.
Recommended publications
  • Onetouch 4.0 Scanned Documents
    / Chapter 2 THE FOSSIL RECORD OF BIRDS Storrs L. Olson Department of Vertebrate Zoology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC. I. Introduction 80 II. Archaeopteryx 85 III. Early Cretaceous Birds 87 IV. Hesperornithiformes 89 V. Ichthyornithiformes 91 VI. Other Mesozojc Birds 92 VII. Paleognathous Birds 96 A. The Problem of the Origins of Paleognathous Birds 96 B. The Fossil Record of Paleognathous Birds 104 VIII. The "Basal" Land Bird Assemblage 107 A. Opisthocomidae 109 B. Musophagidae 109 C. Cuculidae HO D. Falconidae HI E. Sagittariidae 112 F. Accipitridae 112 G. Pandionidae 114 H. Galliformes 114 1. Family Incertae Sedis Turnicidae 119 J. Columbiformes 119 K. Psittaciforines 120 L. Family Incertae Sedis Zygodactylidae 121 IX. The "Higher" Land Bird Assemblage 122 A. Coliiformes 124 B. Coraciiformes (Including Trogonidae and Galbulae) 124 C. Strigiformes 129 D. Caprimulgiformes 132 E. Apodiformes 134 F. Family Incertae Sedis Trochilidae 135 G. Order Incertae Sedis Bucerotiformes (Including Upupae) 136 H. Piciformes 138 I. Passeriformes 139 X. The Water Bird Assemblage 141 A. Gruiformes 142 B. Family Incertae Sedis Ardeidae 165 79 Avian Biology, Vol. Vlll ISBN 0-12-249408-3 80 STORES L. OLSON C. Family Incertae Sedis Podicipedidae 168 D. Charadriiformes 169 E. Anseriformes 186 F. Ciconiiformes 188 G. Pelecaniformes 192 H. Procellariiformes 208 I. Gaviiformes 212 J. Sphenisciformes 217 XI. Conclusion 217 References 218 I. Introduction Avian paleontology has long been a poor stepsister to its mammalian counterpart, a fact that may be attributed in some measure to an insufRcien- cy of qualified workers and to the absence in birds of heterodont teeth, on which the greater proportion of the fossil record of mammals is founded.
    [Show full text]
  • Speciation 1
    1/17/2012 Avian Systematics Avian Systematics • The goal of systematics (and classification) is to provide a correct • Systematics deals with evolutionary phylogeny (evolutionary family tree) for relationships among organisms. Allied organisms. with classification (or taxonomy). • Avian systematics deals with how the • All birds are classified within the single phylogeny of modern birds is Class Aves established. – 2 Subclasses – 4 Infraclasses Class Aves • Subclass Sauriurae – Infraclass Archaeornithes - Archaeopteryx – Infraclass Enantiornithes - Opposite birds • Subclass Ornithurae – Infraclass Odontornithes - New World toothed birds – Infraclass Neornithes • Superorder Paleognathae - ratites and tinamous • Superorder Neognathae - all other birds Avian Phylogeny based on Feduccia (1995) 1 1/17/2012 Avian Systematics Avian Systematics • Living birds comprise approximately: • Basic unit of classification = Species – 30 Orders – 193 Families – 2,099 Genera – 9,700 species I. Speciation 1. BSC – groups of interbreeding natural populations that are reproductively isolated from other such groups (Mayr 1970) Central question > Origin of species What does one use to group taxa? A. What is a species? •size • color • behavior • genetics 2 1/17/2012 What are the problems associated with Painted Bunting using this definition? When populations hybridize we can directly define a species. What if two populations are separated? Thompson 1991 Condor 93:987-1000 Phylogenetic Species Concept •Approach gives greater weight to recognition PSC – a species is the smallest aggregation of of separate evolutionary histories of isolated populations diagnosable by a unique populations. combination of character states in individuals •Less emphasis placed on development of within which there is a parental pattern of reproductive isolation. ancestry and descent 3 1/17/2012 •American Ornithologists’ Union Committee on Classification and Nomenclature only recognizes BSC.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of the Early Cretaceous Enantiornithine Bird Rapaxavis Pani
    Anatomy of the Early Cretaceous enantiornithine bird Rapaxavis pani JINGMAI K. O’CONNOR, LUIS M. CHIAPPE, CHUNLING GAO, and BO ZHAO O’Connor, J.K., Chiappe, L.M., Gao, C., and Zhao, B. 2011. Anatomy of the Early Cretaceous enantiornithine bird Rapaxavis pani. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56 (3): 463–475. The exquisitely preserved longipterygid enantiornithine Rapaxavis pani is redescribed here after more extensive prepara− tion. A complete review of its morphology is presented based on information gathered before and after preparation. Among other features, Rapaxavis pani is characterized by having an elongate rostrum (close to 60% of the skull length), rostrally restricted dentition, and schizorhinal external nares. Yet, the most puzzling feature of this bird is the presence of a pair of pectoral bones (here termed paracoracoidal ossifications) that, with the exception of the enantiornithine Concornis lacustris, are unknown within Aves. Particularly notable is the presence of a distal tarsal cap, formed by the fu− sion of distal tarsal elements, a feature that is controversial in non−ornithuromorph birds. The holotype and only known specimen of Rapaxavis pani thus reveals important information for better understanding the anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of longipterygids, in particular, as well as basal birds as a whole. Key words: Aves, Enantiornithes, Longipterygidae, Rapaxavis, Jiufotang Formation, Early Cretaceous, China. Jingmai K. O’Connor [[email protected]], Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, 142 Xizhimenwaidajie, Beijing, China, 100044; The Dinosaur Institute, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA; Luis M. Chiappe [[email protected]], The Dinosaur Institute, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Ex− position Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA; Chunling Gao [[email protected]] and Bo Zhao [[email protected]], Dalian Natural History Museum, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Othniel Charles Marsh
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS VOLUME XX-FIRST MEMOIR BIOGRAPHICAL hlEhlOIR OE OTHNIEL CHARLES MARSH BY CHARLES SCHUCHEKT PRESENTED TO THE -4C.4DEhlY AT THE ASSU.\L JIEETIPU'G, 1938 OTHNIEL CHARLES MARSH BY CHARLES SCHUCIIERT Othniel Charles Marsh, for ,twelve years president of the National r\caderny of Sciences, was born to Caleb Marsh and Mary Gaines Peabody on October 29, 1831, in Lockport, New York, and died in New Haven, Connecticut, on March 18, 1899. One of the three founders of the science of vertebrate paleon- tology in America, his career furnishes an outstanding exatnple of the indomitable spirit that drives men on to a determined goal. His motto might well have been. "\l.That 1 have, I hold." He asked no quarter, and gave none. :It home around a camp fire or in an army tent, formal as a presiding officer or in society, at times austere and autocratic, at others a raconteur of note, he left a lasting impression on his chosen 111-anch of science. Summarizing his work statistically, it may be said that he- tween 1861 and 1899 he published about 300 papers, reports, and books. Of new genera he described 225, and of new species, 496; of new families 64, of su1)orders 8, of orders 19, and of subclasses I. Of his work on vertebrate fossils in general, Osbom says that he "carried out the most intensive field esl)loration known to science ant1 pul~lishetl a large num1)er of 1)reliminary papcrs, which fairly revol~~tionizedour knowledge." ANCESTRY AKD TIZ:\INISG John hlarsh of Salem, the first of his name recorded as emigrating from England to America, is believctl to have reached In the preparation of this memorial, the writer has been aided greatly by the excellent skctches of Professor Marsh writtcn by George Bird Grinnell, Charles E.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Ornithology
    New Jersey School of Conservation One Wapalanne Road Branchville, NJ 07826-5116 800-624-7780 (dial option 3) or 973-948-4646 Fax: 973-948-5131 [email protected] http://www.csam.montclair.edu/njsoc/ Introduction to Ornithology DESCRIPTION: This session is designed to give students an appreciation of the important role birds play in our ecosystem. The students will have the opportunity to see and identify live birds at our feeders as well as simulated wooden birds placed along a trail. This trail is designed to give students practice locating and identifying common species of birds. The twelve stations that are part of the trail highlight a variety of birds and habitats. The trail is “teacher friendly” in that the accompanying teacher’s manual provides photographs and information about each bird along the trail. OBJECTIVES: • Students will be able to track the evolution of birds from their reptilian ancestors and recognize the first fossilized remains of a bird-like organism. • Students will be able to list the adaptations that birds have evolved that allows them to fly, feed, build nests and mate. • Students will gain experience using field guides and binoculars to identify birds. • Students will gain insight into the study of ornithology, and to bird watching as a recreational pastime. • Students will be able to state the value of birds, the role they play in the natural environment, the threats to their existence, and ways in which we can all help our feathered friends. • Teachers will learn how to conduct a ‘bird activity’ that is user friendly and can be used to enrich their student’s knowledge of ‘back yard’ wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • A Diapsid Skull in a New Species of the Primitive Bird Confuciusornis
    letters to nature 8. Hemley, J. J., Cygan, G. L., Fein, J. B., Robinson, G. R. & D’Angelo, W. M. Hydrothermal ore-forming remarkably well preserved skeleton with feathers and, for the first processes in the light of studies in rock-buffered systems: I. Iron-copper-zinc-lead sulfide solubility relations. Econ. Geol. 87, 1–22 (1992). time in the Mesozoic record, direct evidence of the shape of a 9. Seward, T. M. & Barnes, H. L. in Geochemistry of Hydrothermal Ore Deposits 3rd edn (ed. Barnes, H. L.) horny beak. It has a complete and large preserved postorbital that 435–486 (Wiley, New York, 1997). has a broad contact with the jugal bone. This character is 10. Taylor, S. R. & McLennan, S. M. The Continental Crust: its Composition and Evolution (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1985). presently only known in Confuciusornis, and may confirm pre- 11. McDonald, G. D. & Arnold, L. C. Geological and geochemical zoning of the Grasberg igneous vious suggestions of a postorbital in Archaeopteryx5. The squamosal complex, Irian Jaya, Indonesia. J. Geochem. Explor. 50, 143–178 (1994). 12. Ulrich, T. in Actas X Congreso Latinoamericano de Geologia and VI Congreso Nacional de Geologia is in tight contact with the postorbital. These two bones form an Economica 239 (Universidad de Buenos Aires, 1998). arch dividing the upper and lower temporal fenestrae, as in other 13. Gu¨nther, D., Frischknecht, R., Heinrich, C. A. & Kahlert, H.-J. Capabilities of an argon fluoride 193nm 6 excimer laser for laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry microanalysis of diapsid reptiles . The presence of a typical diapsid cheek region geological materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections Volume 117, Number 4
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 117, NUMBER 4 A REVISED CLASSIFICATION FOR THE BIRDS OF THE WORLD BY ALEXANDER WETMORE Secretary, Smithsonian Institution (Publication 4057) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOVEMBER 1, 1951 Zl^t £orb <§aitimovt (pvtee BALTIMORE, MD., V. 8. A. A REVISED CLASSIFICATION FOR THE BIRDS OF THE WORLD By ALEXANDER WETMORE Secretary, Smithsonian Institution Since the revision of this classification published in 1940'- detailed studies by the increasing numbers of competent investigators in avian anatomy have added greatly to our knov^ledge of a number of groups of birds. These additional data have brought important changes in our understanding that in a number of instances require alteration in time-honored arrangements in classification, as well as the inclusion of some additional families. A fevi^ of these were covered in an edition issued in mimeographed form on November 20, 1948. The present revision includes this material and much in addition, based on the au- thor's review of the work of others and on his own continuing studies in this field. His consideration necessarily has included fossil as well as living birds, since only through an understanding of what is known of extinct forms can we arrive at a logical grouping of the species that naturalists have seen in the living state. The changes from the author's earlier arrangement are discussed in the following paragraphs. Addition of a separate family, Archaeornithidae, for the fossil Archaeornis sieniensi, reflects the evident fact that our two most ancient fossil birds, Archaeopteryx and Archaeornis, are not so closely related as their earlier union in one family proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiftee N Vertebrate Beginnings the Chordates
    Hickman−Roberts−Larson: 15. Vertebrate Beginnings: Text © The McGraw−Hill Animal Diversity, Third The Chordates Companies, 2002 Edition 15 chapter •••••• fifteen Vertebrate Beginnings The Chordates It’s a Long Way from Amphioxus Along the more southern coasts of North America, half buried in sand on the seafloor,lives a small fishlike translucent animal quietly filtering organic particles from seawater.Inconspicuous, of no commercial value and largely unknown, this creature is nonetheless one of the famous animals of classical zoology.It is amphioxus, an animal that wonderfully exhibits the four distinctive hallmarks of the phylum Chordata—(1) dorsal, tubular nerve cord overlying (2) a supportive notochord, (3) pharyngeal slits for filter feeding, and (4) a postanal tail for propulsion—all wrapped up in one creature with textbook simplicity. Amphioxus is an animal that might have been designed by a zoologist for the classroom. During the nineteenth century,with inter- est in vertebrate ancestry running high, amphioxus was considered by many to resemble closely the direct ancestor of the vertebrates. Its exalted position was later acknowledged by Philip Pope in a poem sung to the tune of “Tipperary.”It ends with the refrain: It’s a long way from amphioxus It’s a long way to us, It’s a long way from amphioxus To the meanest human cuss. Well,it’s good-bye to fins and gill slits And it’s welcome lungs and hair, It’s a long, long way from amphioxus But we all came from there. But amphioxus’place in the sun was not to endure.For one thing,amphioxus lacks one of the most important of vertebrate charac- teristics,a distinct head with special sense organs and the equipment for shifting to an active predatory mode of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Note: in General, Terms Have Been Defined As They Apply to Birds
    Glossary Note: In general, terms have been defined as they apply to birds. Nevertheless, many terms (especially those naming basic ana- tomical structures or biological principles) apply to a range of living things beyond birds. In most cases, terms that apply only to birds are noted as such. Most terms that are bolded in the text of the Handbook of Bird Biology appear here. Numbers in brackets following each entry give the primary pages on which the term is defined. Please note that this glossary is also available on the Internet at <www.birds.cornell.edu/homestudy>. aerodynamic valve: A vortex-like movement of air within the air A tubes of each avian lung, at the junction between the mesobron- abdominal air sacs: A pair of air sacs in the abdominal region chus and the first secondary bronchus; it prevents the backflow of birds that may have connections into the bones of the pelvis of air into the mesobronchus by forcing the incoming air along and femur; their position within the abdominal cavity may shift the mesobronchus and into the posterior air sacs. [4·102] during the day to maintain the bird’s streamlined shape during African barbets: A family (Lybiidae, 42 species) of small, color- digestion and egg laying. [4·101] ful, stocky African birds with large, sometimes serrated, beaks; abducent nerve: The sixth cranial nerve; it stimulates a muscle they dig their nest cavities in trees, earthen banks, or termite of the eyeball and two skeletal muscles that move the nictitating nests. [1·85] membrane across the eyeball.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Birds of China
    Mesozoic Birds of China by Lianhai Hou Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology Published by the Phoenix Valley Provincial Aviary of Taiwan Translated By Will Downs Bilby Research Center Northern Arizona University January, 2001 III Table of Contents Abvreviations for figures ..................................................................V Foreword by Delongjiang..................................................................X Foreword by Guangmei Zheng ..........................................................XI Foreword by Alan Feduccia............................................................XIII Foreword by Larry D. Martin..........................................................XIV Preface .....................................................................................XV Chapter 1. Synopsis of research Historical and geographic synopsis........................................................1 History of research ..........................................................................7 Chapter 2. Taxonomic descriptions...............................................................10 Sauriurae.............................................................................................11 Confuciusornithiformes Confuciusornithidae Confuciusornis Confuciusornis sanctus ........................................11 Confuciusornis chuonzhous sp. nov.........................33 Confuciusornis suniae sp. nov................................37 Jibeinia luanhera .........................................................50
    [Show full text]
  • Gli Uccelli Del Mesozoico
    13/12/2013 Gli Uccelli del Mesozoico I primi protouccelli o Archaeorniti si sono evoluti da piccoli Dinosauri Teropodi nel Giurassico Superiore Erano piumati e probabilmente in grado di volare Molto rapidamente e più volte nella loro storia evolutiva si differenziano in forme predatrici/onnivore terrestri e molte altre forme che sviluppano uno stupefacente adattamento al volo 1 13/12/2013 Durante il Cretacico si ha una imponente radiazione adattativa con non meno di una dozzina di ordini diversi L’estinzione di massa alla fine del Cretacico coinvolge vari ordini di uccelli e sopravvivono solo i Neorniti, che nel Cenozoico diedero a oro volta luogo ad una grande radiazione adattativa Il piano strutturale dei Neorniti rimane però più costante Cranio Perdita denti –ranfoteca Quadrato mobile, mascella mobile rispetto scatola cranica Articolazione nasofrontale Cervello molto grande rispetto ai Dinosauri 2 13/12/2013 Colonna vertebrale Vertebre cervicali con coste piccole non sovrapposte Vertebre dorsali anteriori spesso fuse in un notario Vertebre sacrali numerose e fuse in un sinsacro Vertebre caudali ridotte e fuse a formare un pigostile mobile, che regge le penne timoniere sinsacro Cinto pelvico Molto robusto, fuso al sinsacro Deve reggere lo shock dell’atterraggio e fornire inserzione ai robusti muscoli degli arti posteriori sinsacro dorsale ventrale 3 13/12/2013 Coste con processi uncinati Sterno carenato Cinto pettorale robusto scapola omero Grande pettorale coracoide sopracoracoideo furcula sterno Nel canale triosseo scorre il tendine
    [Show full text]
  • Higher-Order Phylogeny of Modern Birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) Based on Comparative Anatomy
    Blackwell Publishing LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082© 2007 The Linnean Society of London? 2007 1491 195 Original Article HIGHER-ORDER PHYLOGENY OF MODERN BIRDS B. C. LIVEZEY and R. L. ZUSI Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2007, 149, 1–95. With 18 figures Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion BRADLEY C. LIVEZEY1* and RICHARD L. ZUSI2 1Section of Birds, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-4080, USA 2Division of Birds, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA Received April 2006; accepted for publication September 2006 OnlineOpen: This article is available free online at www.blackwell-synergy.com In recent years, avian systematics has been characterized by a diminished reliance on morphological cladistics of mod- ern taxa, intensive palaeornithogical research stimulated by new discoveries and an inundation by analyses based on DNA sequences. Unfortunately, in contrast to significant insights into basal origins, the broad picture of neor- nithine phylogeny remains largely unresolved. Morphological studies have emphasized characters of use in palae- ontological contexts. Molecular studies, following disillusionment with the pioneering, but non-cladistic, work of Sibley and Ahlquist, have differed markedly from each other and from morphological works in both methods and find- ings. Consequently, at the turn of the millennium, points of robust agreement among schools concerning higher-order neornithine phylogeny have been limited to the two basalmost and several mid-level, primary groups. This paper describes a phylogenetic (cladistic) analysis of 150 taxa of Neornithes, including exemplars from all non-passeriform families, and subordinal representatives of Passeriformes.
    [Show full text]