Health Policy Brief the State of Tobacco Use Prevention and Cessation in Ohio Environmental Scan and Policy Implications
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
June 2015 Health Policy Brief The state of tobacco use prevention and cessation in Ohio Environmental scan and policy implications After releasing the Health Value Dashboard in prevalence of tobacco use given the December 2014, HPIO convened a group of strengths and challenges of Ohio’s current healthcare and public health stakeholders to tobacco policies. review Ohio’s greatest health strengths and challenges. This group identified tobacco use In addition, HPIO will soon release an as a significant concern, noting that compared accountability map that describes how various to other states, Ohio performed in the bottom public health and healthcare entities in Ohio quartile for the following metrics: are accountable for specific tobacco-related Ohio’s metrics. Metric rank Adult cigarette smoking 44 Part 1. Environmental scan Secondhand smoke exposure for children 49 The purpose of this environmental scan is to describe the current status of tobacco use in Tobacco prevention and control spending 46 Ohio, review the state-level policy landscape Tobacco use is highly relevant to state health from the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement policy because it impacts a significant number to the current session of the General Assembly, of Ohioans (approximately 2.2 million youth and and describe the extent to which Ohio is adult tobacco users1), is a major cause of illness implementing evidence-based strategies proven and premature death (see Figure 1), and results to reduce tobacco use. in lost productivity and increased healthcare Figure 1. Health consequences of costs.2 smoking and secondhand smoke Tobacco use also contributes to infant mortality Conditions causally linked to smoking and diabetes, two other health issues for which Cancers Chronic diseases Ohio ranks in the bottom quartile of states on the • Trachea, bronchus and • Diabetes Health Value Dashboard. Researchers estimate lung • Stroke • Larynx • Coronary heart that 23% to 34% of cases of Sudden Infant Death • Esophagus disease Syndrome (SIDS) and 5-8% of preterm-related • Oropharynx • Chronic obstructive deaths are attributable to prenatal smoking in • Acute myeloid leukemia pulmonary disease the U.S.3 The risk of developing diabetes is 30% to • Stomach (COPD), asthma 4 • Liver and other respiratory 40% higher for active smokers than nonsmokers. • Pancreas diseases • Cervix • Reproductive effects Because tobacco use is disproportionately high • Colorectal in women among Ohioans with lower incomes and with • Kidney and ureter • Congenital defects— • Bladder maternal smoking: disabilities, it is a significant cost driver for the orofacial clefts Medicaid program. An analysis of 2006-2010 • Pneumonia medical expenditures in the U.S. found that 15% • Hip fractures of Medicaid costs were attributable to cigarette • Male erectile 5 dysfunction smoking. • And others Conditions causally linked to exposure to secondhand To provide policymakers and other stakeholders smoke with information to guide efforts to reduce For adults For children tobacco use in Ohio, this policy brief has two • Reproductive effects in • Sudden Infant Death parts: women: low birth weight Syndrome • Environmental scan: Description of the • Stroke • Lower respiratory illness current status and recent history of tobacco • Coronary heart disease • Respiratory symptoms, • Lung cancer impaired lung function use prevention and control in Ohio. • Middle ear disease • Policy implications: List of the state-level Source: The health consequences of smoking—50 years PB policy options most likely to decrease the of progress. A report of the Surgeon General. 2014. 1 Tobacco use in Ohio Adult disparities and regional Adult prevalence and trends differences In 2013, 23.4% of Ohio adults smoked There are large disparities in tobacco use cigarettes, while 2.8% reported cigar smoking across demographic groups in Ohio. Tobacco and 2.3% reported smokeless tobacco use.6 use disproportionately impacts Ohioans with The cigarette-smoking rate in Ohio is well lower levels of education (see Figure 3). above the national rate of 19.9% and the Ohioans with less than a high school diploma Healthy People 2020 goal of 12%.7 While or GED are more than four times as likely smoking prevalence has declined in Ohio over to be current cigarette smokers compared the past 15 years, the reduction has been to college graduates (41.2% and 9.5%, slower in Ohio than in the U.S. overall (see respectively).9 Similarly, with a smoking rate Figure 2). Ohio adult smoking rates declined of 37.3%, adults with incomes below $15,000 13.8% from 1998-2010, compared to a 24.5% are nearly two and a half times more likely to decline nationwide.8 smoke as those in the highest income group.10 Figure 2. Adult cigarette smoking prevalence, key policy changes and tobacco prevention and control funding in Ohio, 1998-2015 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Tobacco Use Prevention and Control Foundation leads comprehensive strategy 1998 2005 2015 Tobacco Master 2007 Settlement Ohio cigarette tax Governor Smoke-Free Workplace Act Agreement increase (to current includes $1.00 rate of $1.25) enforcement began cigarette tax $54,764,900 increase in 2008 2002 proposed Ohio Tobacco Ohio Tobacco Prevention 2016-17 budget; Prevention Foundation Foundation eliminated removed and funding allocated to programs begin, STAND $48,925,490 by House of youth campaign other budget items Representatives launched $46,277,393 $46,234,646 2009 Ohio cigarette tax Federal increase cigarette tax increase $39,670,452 2010 Affordable Care Act preventive services requirements begin, including coverage of tobacco 27.6% 27.6% 26.1% cessation interventions without cost-sharing Ohio 23.2% 23.2% 23.2% 23.4% U.S. $28,525,232 22.9% new 20.1% methodology 19% 17.3% Healthy People 2020 Target 12% $9,771,079 $7,633,907 $7,367,009 $6,381,412 $3,319,482 $3,079,543 $2,158,535 Total tobacco prevention and control spending in Ohio (master settlement agreement, state and CDC sources), by State Fiscal Year Source for smoking prevalence: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS) 2 Source for spending amounts: American Lung Association 3 Figure 3. Ohio adult cigarette Household income also impacts the rate at which children are use, by education level (age exposed to secondhand smoke and tobacco, with the highest rates of exposure for those in households nearer the federal 20+), 2013 poverty level (FPL) (see Figure 4).11 41.2% According to the 2012 Ohio Medicaid Assessment Survey (OMAS), working-age adults enrolled in Medicaid were nearly two times more likely to smoke than non-enrollees (48.6% versus 25.6%).12 Smoking rates for Medicaid enrollees with a mental health-related impairment (MHI) were even higher at 58.5% (see Figure 5).13 In the U.S., adults with disabilities are more likely to use 26.5% cigarettes (30.3%) than those without disabilities (16.7%)—a 13.6 percentage point disparity.14 In Ohio, that disparity is even 22.8% more pronounced; 38.7% of Ohioans with disabilities smoked in 2012, compared to 20.8% of those without disabilities—a 17.9 percentage point disparity (see Figure 6). Ohio also has higher smoking rates among pregnant women, compared to the U.S. overall (see Figure 7). In Ohio, 16.5% of women smoked during the last 3 months of pregnancy, compared to 10.7% in the U.S.15 Ohio also had a 25% higher rate 9.5% of women who smoked during the 3 months prior to becoming pregnant (31.1%, compared to a national rate of 23.2%). Additionally, only 47.2% of Ohio smokers quit during pregnancy, compared to 54.3% in the U.S. Less than high school High school or GED Some post-high school College grad Source: 2013 BRFSS Figure 5. Current cigarette smoking among Medicaid-enrolled adults (age 19-64) in Ohio, 2012 Figure 4. Ohio children exposed to secondhand 25.6% smoke, by poverty level, current 48.6% 2011/2012 smoker current smoker 22.2% Not Medicaid enrolled Medicaid enrolled 10.7% 8.6% 58.5% current smoker 0.9% 0-99% 100- 200- 400% FPL 199% 399% FPL or FPL FPL higher Source: 2011/2012 National Medicaid enrolled with Survey of Children’s Health mental-health related (NSCH) impairment (MHI) Source: 2012 Ohio Medicaid Assessment Survey (OMAS) 2 3 Figure 6. Adult cigarette use, by Adult smoking rates vary widely by region and disability status, 2012 county within Ohio. Smoking prevalence is higher in Appalachian counties, as well as some north 38.7% central counties (see Figure 8). Meigs County had the highest proportion of adults who smoked (39.7%) from 2006 to 2012, over three times higher than the county with the lowest rate (Delaware, 12.3%).16 Overall, 70% of Ohio counties had U.S. 30.3% smoking levels higher than the national rate.17 17.9 percentage point difference in Ohio There is also a sharp disparity in smoking 13.6 prevalence between straight and lesbian, gay, percentage bisexual and transgender (LGBT) adults. In Ohio, point LGBT adults are nearly twice as likely to smoke, difference 20.8% with 43.4% reporting current cigarette smoking in U.S. compared to 22.6% of straight adults.18 U.S. 16.7% Ohio’s adult cigarette smoking rates do not vary widely by race, ethnicity or gender.19 Rates for African-American, Hispanic, and White (non- Hispanic) Ohioans were 25.6%, 24.1% and 22.8%, respectively. Cigarette smoking rates were also similar by gender; 24.1% of males reported smoking and 22.6% of females reported smoking in 2013. Rates for cigar and smokeless tobacco use, however, were notably higher among males.20 Ohio Ohio Youth prevalence and trends Adults with Adults without In 2013, 21.7% of Ohio high school students disabilities disabilities reported that they used tobacco products within Source: 2012 BRFSS the past 30 days, including cigarettes, cigars, and smokeless tobacco.21 This is below the national Figure 7.