DOCSLIB.ORG

Checklist of Mammals Listed in the CITES Appendices and in EC Regulation 338/97

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Checklist of Mammals Listed in the CITES Appendices and in EC Regulation 338/97 JNCC Report No. 380 Checklist of mammals listed in the CITES appendices and in EC Regulation 338/97 7th edition 2005 compiled by UNEP-WCMC © JNCC 2005 The JNCC is the forum through which the three country conservation agencies - the Countryside Council for Wales, English Nature and Scottish Natural Heritage - deliver their statutory responsibilities for Great Britain as a whole, and internationally. These responsibilities contribute to sustaining and enriching biological diversity, enhancing geological features and sustaining natural systems. As well as a source of advice and knowledge for the public, JNCC is the Government's wildlife adviser, providing guidance on the development of policies for, or affecting, nature conservation in Great Britain or internationally. Published by: Joint Nature Conservation Committee Copyright: 2005 Joint Nature Conservation Committee ISBN: 1st edition published 1987 ISBN 0-86139-336-8 2nd edition published 1993 ISBN 1-873701-44-6 3rd edition published 1995 ISSN 0963-8091 4th edition published 1999 ISSN 0963-8091 5th edition published 2001 ISSN 0963-8091 6th edition published 2003 ISSN 0963-8091 7th edition published 2005 ISSN 0963-8091 Citation: UNEP-WCMC (2005). Checklist of mammals listed in the CITES appendices and in EC Regulation 338/97. 7th edition. JNCC Report No. 380. Further copies of this report available from: CITES Unit Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY United Kingdom Tel: +44 1733 562626 Fax: +44 1733 555948 This document can also be downloaded from: http://www.ukcites.gov.uk and www.jncc.gov.uk Prepared under contract from the Joint Nature Conservation Committee by UNEP- WCMC. The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre was established in 2000 as the world biodiversity information and assessment centre of the United Nations Environment Programme. The roots of the organisation go back to 1979, when it was founded as the IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre. In 1988 the World Conservation Monitoring Centre was created jointly by IUCN, WWF International and UNEP. The financial support and guidance of these organisations in the Centre’s formative years is gratefully acknowledged. The designations of geographical entities in this report, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of JNCC or WCMC concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Contents ANOMALURIDAE.......................... 40 Acknowledgements ....................i MURIDAE .............................. 10,41 Introduction ...............................i HYSTRICIDAE ............................. 41 Explanatory notes......................ii ERETHIZONTIDAE ....................... 41 AGOUTIDAE................................ 42 Introductory References ......... vii DASYPROCTIDAE......................... 42 CHINCHILLIDAE .......................... 42 CHORDATA...................................... 1 MAMMALIA................................... 1 CETACEA................................... 42 PLATANISTIDAE .......................... 42 MONOTREMATA.......................... 1 ZIPHIIDAE.................................. 43 TACHYGLOSSIDAE ........................ 1 PHYSETERIDAE ........................... 46 MONODONTIDAE......................... 47 DASYUROMORPHIA.................... 1 DELPHINIDAE ............................. 47 THYLACINIDAE ............................. 1 PHOCOENIDAE............................ 54 DASYURIDAE................................ 1 ESCHRICHTIIDAE ........................ 55 BALAENOPTERIDAE ..................... 55 PERAMELEMORPHIA................... 1 NEOBALAENIDAE......................... 57 PERAMELIDAE .............................. 1 BALAENIDAE.......................... 57,58 DIPROTODONTIA ....................... 2 CARNIVORA.............................. 58 VOMBATIDAE ............................... 2 CANIDAE.................................... 58 PHALANGERIDAE .......................... 2 URSIDAE.................................... 61 POTOROIDAE ............................... 2 PROCYONIDAE ............................ 63 MACROPODIDAE ........................... 3 MUSTELIDAE .............................. 64 VIVERRIDAE ............................... 68 SCANDENTIA.............................. 3 HERPESTIDAE............................. 70 TUPAIIDAE................................... 3 HYAENIDAE ................................ 71 FELIDAE..................................... 71 CHIROPTERA.............................. 5 OTARIIDAE................................. 79 PTEROPODIDAE ............................ 5 ODOBENIDAE ............................. 79 PHYLLOSTOMIDAE ...................... 10 PHOCIDAE.................................. 80 PRIMATES ................................ 10 PROBOSCIDEA.......................... 80 LEMURIDAE................................ 10 ELEPHANTIDAE ........................... 80 MEGALADAPIDAE ........................ 11 CHEIROGALEIDAE ....................... 12 SIRENIA ................................... 81 INDRIDAE .................................. 13 DUGONGIDAE ............................. 81 DAUBENTONIIDAE ...................... 14 TRICHECHIDAE ........................... 81 LORIDAE.................................... 14 GALAGONIDAE ........................... 15 PERISSODACTYLA .................... 82 TARSIIDAE................................. 16 EQUIDAE.................................... 82 CALLITRICHIDAE ........................ 17 TAPIRIDAE ................................. 83 CEBIDAE.................................... 20 RHINOCEROTIDAE....................... 83 CERCOPITHECIDAE ..................... 25 HYLOBATIDAE ............................ 35 ARTIODACTYLA ........................ 84 HOMINIDAE ............................... 36 TRAGULIDAE .............................. 84 SUIDAE...................................... 85 XENARTHRA ............................. 37 TAYASSUIDAE............................. 85 MYRMECOPHAGIDAE ................... 37 HIPPOPOTAMIDAE ....................... 85 BRADYPODIDAE.......................... 37 CAMELIDAE ................................ 86 MEGALONYCHIDAE...................... 37 MOSCHIDAE ............................... 86 DASYPODIDAE............................ 37 CERVIDAE .................................. 87 ANTILOCAPRIDAE........................ 90 PHOLIDOTA.............................. 38 BOVIDAE.................................... 90 MANIDAE ................................... 38 LAGOMORPHA .......................... 39 LEPORIDAE ................................ 39 References .......................... 97 Index..................................158 RODENTIA................................ 39 SCIURIDAE ................................ 39 Acknowledgements This checklist was compiled by UNEP-WCMC under contract with the Joint Nature Conservation Committee. The volume builds on earlier editions, and the numerous contributors to those editions are acknowledged. UNEP-WCMC staff involved in the production of this volume include Tim Inskipp, Sarah Ferriss, James O’Carroll and Tobias Garstecki. The project was supervised by Gerardo Fragoso. Vin Fleming, Alison Littlewood and Nichola Burnett of the JNCC CITES Unit are thanked for providing advice and guidance throughout. Introduction In April 1991, the Nature Conservancy For background material on the rationale Council for England (English Nature), of the IUCN threat categories, readers Countryside Council for Wales and are referred to IUCN (2004); for Scottish Natural Heritage acting background on the workings of CITES, together through the Joint Nature recommended works are Favre (1989) Conservation Committee were and Wijnstekers (2003). For information appointed by the Secretary of State for on the implementation of CITES in the the Environment as the United EU, see European Commission (2005). Kingdom's Scientific Authority for For information by country on the Animals under the Convention on diversity and status of mammals and International Trade in Endangered other taxonomic groups, and for a Species of Wild Fauna and Flora general review of biodiversity, readers (CITES). CITES regulates international are referred to Groombridge and Jenkins trade in wild animals and plants and in (2002). products derived from them, to help to ensure their conservation on a global In a publication of this nature, it is scale. inevitable that users will discover entries that need correcting or updating. The The intention of this publication is to publishers and UNEP-WCMC would be provide a list of the species and grateful to receive details of those entries subspecies of mammal included in the so that the necessary changes can be CITES Appendices, together with their made in the database from which this conservation status category in the document is produced. 2004 IUCN Red List of threatened species (IUCN, 2004) and the The database is continually updated and appropriate Annex in EC Regulation the downloaded version of this document 338/97 (and subsequent updates). may contain more recent information than the original printed publication. This revised edition incorporates additions and amendments to the CITES appendices up to and including those made at the 13th Conference of the Parties in Thailand in October 2004 (effective from 12 January 2005) and those outlined in CITES Notification 2004/074 and Notification 2005/029. The most recent EC Regulation to amend the Annexes is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Halloween Icon Bats
    Grey-headed flying fox. Photo: Andrew Mercer Bats- A Halloween Icon J. Morton Galetto, CU Maurice River Bats are the only mammals that can fly. Flying squirrels would more properly be called gliders since they can’t perform a sustained flight, but rather simply float from one place to another using a cape of sorts to soar. Over the years bats have been misunderstood and their history is shrouded in false legends, from transformations into vampires to attacking people’s hair. Yes, I’m in the Halloween spirit and it’s time to get ghoulish. In Australia I was fascinated by fruit bats (pteropus), the world’s largest member of their species. Since the face is fox-like they are commonly referred to as flying foxes. They become active before dusk and look like raptors with their 3-foot wing span, while their bodies are about 16” long. Their lifespan is 15-23 years. As dusk approached my amazement at seeing hundreds of flying foxes wheeling in the air seemed ridiculous to the Aussies. But come on, to an outsider it was incredible! Flying fox do not rely on echolocation as our bats do, but rather use their large eyes to find food. I witnessed the urban bat camps in the Royal Botanic Gardens in Sydney that could house hundreds of thousands of these creatures. Because of their large colonies they have a number of detractors. But large numbers in only a few congregations often make a species more vulnerable to extinction. Loss of habitat, slow reproduction, and high juvenile mortality are factors as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Mammals of Indonesia
    CHECKLIST OF THE MAMMALS OF INDONESIA Scientific, English, Indonesia Name and Distribution Area Table in Indonesia Including CITES, IUCN and Indonesian Category for Conservation i ii CHECKLIST OF THE MAMMALS OF INDONESIA Scientific, English, Indonesia Name and Distribution Area Table in Indonesia Including CITES, IUCN and Indonesian Category for Conservation By Ibnu Maryanto Maharadatunkamsi Anang Setiawan Achmadi Sigit Wiantoro Eko Sulistyadi Masaaki Yoneda Agustinus Suyanto Jito Sugardjito RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES (LIPI) iii © 2019 RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY, INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES (LIPI) Cataloging in Publication Data. CHECKLIST OF THE MAMMALS OF INDONESIA: Scientific, English, Indonesia Name and Distribution Area Table in Indonesia Including CITES, IUCN and Indonesian Category for Conservation/ Ibnu Maryanto, Maharadatunkamsi, Anang Setiawan Achmadi, Sigit Wiantoro, Eko Sulistyadi, Masaaki Yoneda, Agustinus Suyanto, & Jito Sugardjito. ix+ 66 pp; 21 x 29,7 cm ISBN: 978-979-579-108-9 1. Checklist of mammals 2. Indonesia Cover Desain : Eko Harsono Photo : I. Maryanto Third Edition : December 2019 Published by: RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY, INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES (LIPI). Jl Raya Jakarta-Bogor, Km 46, Cibinong, Bogor, Jawa Barat 16911 Telp: 021-87907604/87907636; Fax: 021-87907612 Email: [email protected] . iv PREFACE TO THIRD EDITION This book is a third edition of checklist of the Mammals of Indonesia. The new edition provides remarkable information in several ways compare to the first and second editions, the remarks column contain the abbreviation of the specific island distributions, synonym and specific location. Thus, in this edition we are also corrected the distribution of some species including some new additional species in accordance with the discovery of new species in Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Primates of the Southern Mentawai Islands
    Primate Conservation 2018 (32): 193-203 The Status of Primates in the Southern Mentawai Islands, Indonesia Ahmad Yanuar1 and Jatna Supriatna2 1Department of Biology and Post-graduate Program in Biology Conservation, Tropical Biodiversity Conservation Center- Universitas Nasional, Jl. RM. Harsono, Jakarta, Indonesia 2Department of Biology, FMIPA and Research Center for Climate Change, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia Abstract: Populations of the primates native to the Mentawai Islands—Kloss’ gibbon Hylobates klossii, the Mentawai langur Presbytis potenziani, the Mentawai pig-tailed macaque Macaca pagensis, and the snub-nosed pig-tailed monkey Simias con- color—persist in disturbed and undisturbed forests and forest patches in Sipora, North Pagai and South Pagai. We used the line-transect method to survey primates in Sipora and the Pagai Islands and estimate their population densities. We walked 157.5 km and 185.6 km of line transects on Sipora and on the Pagai Islands, respectively, and obtained 93 sightings on Sipora and 109 sightings on the Pagai Islands. On Sipora, we estimated population densities for H. klossii, P. potenziani, and S. concolor in an area of 9.5 km², and M. pagensis in an area of 12.6 km². On the Pagai Islands, we estimated the population densities of the four primates in an area of 11.1 km². Simias concolor was found to have the lowest group densities on Sipora, whilst P. potenziani had the highest group densities. On the Pagai Islands, H. klossii was the least abundant and M. pagensis had the highest group densities. Primate populations, notably of the snub-nosed pig-tailed monkey and Kloss’ gibbon, are reduced and threatened on the southern Mentawai Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Asian Species/Country Combinations Subject to Long-Standing Import Suspensions
    Review of Asian species/country combinations subject to long-standing import suspensions (Version edited for public release) SRG 54 Prepared for the European Commission Directorate General Environment ENV.E.2. – Environmental Agreements and Trade by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre November, 2010 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring PREPARED FOR Centre 219 Huntingdon Road The European Commission, Brussels, Belgium Cambridge CB3 0DL DISCLAIMER United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 The contents of this report do not necessarily Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 reflect the views or policies of UNEP or Email: [email protected] Website: www.unep-wcmc.org contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply ABOUT UNEP-WORLD CONSERVATION the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on MONITORING CENTRE the part of UNEP, the European Commission or contributory organisations concerning the The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring legal status of any country, territory, city or Centre (UNEP-WCMC), based in Cambridge, area or its authority, or concerning the UK, is the specialist biodiversity information delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. and assessment centre of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), run cooperatively with WCMC, a UK charity. The © Copyright: 2010, European Commission Centre's mission is to evaluate and highlight the many values of biodiversity and put authoritative biodiversity knowledge at the centre of decision-making. Through the analysis and synthesis of global biodiversity knowledge the Centre provides authoritative, strategic and timely information for conventions, countries and organisations to use in the development and implementation of their policies and decisions. The UNEP-WCMC provides objective and scientifically rigorous procedures and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Endemism and Diversity of Small Mammals Along Two Neighboring Bornean Mountains
    Endemism and diversity of small mammals along two neighboring Bornean mountains Miguel Camacho-Sanchez1,2,*, Melissa T.R. Hawkins3,4,5,*, Fred Tuh Yit Yu6, Jesus E. Maldonado3 and Jennifer A. Leonard1 1 Conservation and Evolutionary Genetics Group, Doñana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain 2 CiBIO—Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos da Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal 3 Center for Conservation Genomics, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, USA 4 Department of Biological Sciences, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, USA 5 Division of Mammals, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, USA 6 Sabah Parks, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia * These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT Mountains offer replicated units with large biotic and abiotic gradients in a reduced spatial scale. This transforms them into well-suited scenarios to evaluate biogeographic theories. Mountain biogeography is a hot topic of research and many theories have been proposed to describe the changes in biodiversity with elevation. Geometric constraints, which predict the highest diversity to occur in mid-elevations, have been a focal part of this discussion. Despite this, there is no general theory to explain these patterns, probably because of the interaction among different predictors with the local effects of historical factors. We characterize the diversity of small non-volant mammals across the elevational gradient on Mount (Mt.) Kinabalu (4,095 m) and Mt. Tambuyukon (2,579 m), two neighboring mountains in Borneo, Malaysia. We documented a decrease in species richness with elevation which deviates from expectations of the geometric constraints and suggests that spatial Submitted 14 February 2018 Accepted 9 September 2019 factors (e.g., larger diversity in larger areas) are important.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Common Leopard Panthera Pardus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Kunjo VDC of Mustang District, Nepal
    Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Software http://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only. Status of Common Leopard Panthera pardus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Kunjo VDC of Mustang District, Nepal Submitted by Yadav Ghimirey M.Sc thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Environmental Management Evaluation Committee: Prof. Karan Bahadur Shah Advisor (Member) ………………………… Co-ordinator/AP (Member) ………………………… (Member) Yadav Ghimirey Previous Degree: Bachelor of Science Sikkim Government College Gangtok, Sikkim India School of Environmental Management and Sustainable Development Shantinagar, Kathmandu Nepal October 2006 1 Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Software http://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations and Acronyms ………………………………………………...................i List of Tables .................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures .................................................................................................................. iii List of Plates ……............................................................................................................. iv Abstract ..............................................................................................................................v Acknowledgements........................................................................................................... vi 1. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………….....1
    [Show full text]
  • Deforestation of Primate Habitat on Sumatra and Adjacent Islands, Indonesia
    Primate Conservation 2017 (31): 71-82 Deforestation of Primate Habitat on Sumatra and Adjacent Islands, Indonesia Jatna Supriatna1,2, Asri A. Dwiyahreni2, Nurul Winarni2, Sri Mariati3,4 and Chris Margules2,5 ¹Department of Biology, FMIPA Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia 2Research Center for Climate Change, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia 3Postgraduate Program, Trisakti Institute for Tourism, Pesanggrahan, Jakarta, Indonesia 4Conservation International, Indonesia 5Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia Abstract: The severe declines in forest cover on Sumatra and adjacent islands have been well-documented but that has not slowed the rate of forest loss. Here we present recent data on deforestation rates and primate distribution patterns to argue, yet again, for action to avert potential extinctions of Sumatran primates in the near future. Maps of forest loss were constructed using GIS and satellite imagery. Maps of primate distributions were estimated from published studies, museum records and expert opinion, and the two were overlaid on one another. The extent of deforestation in the provinces of Sumatra between 2000 and 2012 varied from 3.74% (11,599.9 ha in Lampung) to 49.85% (1,844,804.3 ha in Riau), with the highest rates occurring in the provinces of Riau, Jambi, Bangka Belitung and South Sumatra. During that time six species lost 50% or more of their forest habitat: the Banded langur Presbytis femoralis lost 82%, the Black-and-white langur Presbytis bicolor lost 78%, the Black-crested Sumatran langur Presbytis melalophos and the Bangka slow loris Nycticebus bancanus both lost 62%, the Lar gibbon Hylobates lar lost 54%, and the Pale-thighed langur Presbytis siamensis lost 50%.
    [Show full text]
  • FUNAMBULUS SPP., the STRIPED PALM SQUIRRELS 21.1 the Living Animal 21.1.1 Zoology the Striped Palm Squirrels Are Small Rodents W
    CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE FUNAMBULUS SPP., THE STRIPED PALM SQUIRRELS 21.1 The Living Animal 21.1.1 Zoology The striped palm squirrels are small rodents with a head and body length of about 13–15 cm, and a tail which is slightly longer than the body (Plate 29). The two common species of South Asia are the three-striped or southern Indian palm squirrel (Funambulus palmarum) with three white stripes running along its dark brown back, and the fi ve-striped or northern Indian palm squirrel (F. pennanti) with two additional white stripes running on the fl anks, parallel to the three dorsal stripes.1 The most important difference between the two spe- cies is that the fi ve-striped squirrel is essentially commensal with man. It has become almost as dependent on man for food and shelter as house rats and mice, and lives in crowded towns, cities and villages where it shelters in houses, gardens, groves, hedges and in roadside trees. The three-striped squirrel, on the contrary, is a forest animal. It has a particularly shrill bird-like call which it repeats again and again, accompanied by quick jerks of its tail. Both species inhabit the Indian peninsula from the base of the Himalayas southwards, but the fi ve-striped squirrel is more common in northern India, particularly in the drier and more arid portions and extends into the dry plains of the South. The three-striped squirrel predominates in the South, and in the moister parts of western and eastern India. Both species may, however, occur in the same area.
    [Show full text]
  • Husbandry Guidelines for Feathertail Gliders
    Husbandry Guidelines for (Photo: Luke Hogan, 1996) Feathertail Gliders Acrobates frontalis & Acrobates pygmaeus (Mammalia: Acrobatidae) Date By From Version 2012 Tom Patterson WSI Richmond v 1 Husbandry Manual for the Feathertail Glider DISCLAIMER These husbandry guidelines were produced by the compiler/author at TAFE NSW Western Sydney Institute, Richmond College, N.S.W. Australia as part assessment for completion of Certificate III in Captive Animals, Course number 18913. Since the husbandry guidelines are the result of student project work, care should be taken in the interpretation of information therein. In effect, all care taken but no responsibility is assumed for any loss or damage that may result from the use of these guidelines. Care has been taken to acknowledge the correct ownership of work. Should It is offered to the ASZK Husbandry Manuals Register for the benefit of animal welfare and care. Husbandry guidelines are utility documents and are ‘works in progress’, so enhancements to these guidelines are invited. 2 Annual Cycle of Maintenance Breeding Torpor Exhibit Change Replace Scrub Replace Soil Decrease Pest Collect Scrub Leaf nesting Nest (if applicable) food Control Faecal (1) (2) Litter materials Boxes (Torpor) Samples January February March April May June July August September October November December Note: (1) Northern populations – most likely all Acrobates frontalis, (2) Southern populations – most likely all Acrobates pygmaeus. All maintenance cycle should be used as a guide only. These tasks are noted at a minimum, but should be done as required. Record keeping, weights, observations and environmental enrichment should occur all year round OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS OH&S hazards can include anything that may be seen as a potential risk to you as a keeper or a member of the public.
    [Show full text]
  • World's Most Endangered Primates
    Primates in Peril The World’s 25 Most Endangered Primates 2016–2018 Edited by Christoph Schwitzer, Russell A. Mittermeier, Anthony B. Rylands, Federica Chiozza, Elizabeth A. Williamson, Elizabeth J. Macfie, Janette Wallis and Alison Cotton Illustrations by Stephen D. Nash IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG) International Primatological Society (IPS) Conservation International (CI) Bristol Zoological Society (BZS) Published by: IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), International Primatological Society (IPS), Conservation International (CI), Bristol Zoological Society (BZS) Copyright: ©2017 Conservation International All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the publisher. Inquiries to the publisher should be directed to the following address: Russell A. Mittermeier, Chair, IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202, USA. Citation (report): Schwitzer, C., Mittermeier, R.A., Rylands, A.B., Chiozza, F., Williamson, E.A., Macfie, E.J., Wallis, J. and Cotton, A. (eds.). 2017. Primates in Peril: The World’s 25 Most Endangered Primates 2016–2018. IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), International Primatological Society (IPS), Conservation International (CI), and Bristol Zoological Society, Arlington, VA. 99 pp. Citation (species): Salmona, J., Patel, E.R., Chikhi, L. and Banks, M.A. 2017. Propithecus perrieri (Lavauden, 1931). In: C. Schwitzer, R.A. Mittermeier, A.B. Rylands, F. Chiozza, E.A. Williamson, E.J. Macfie, J. Wallis and A. Cotton (eds.), Primates in Peril: The World’s 25 Most Endangered Primates 2016–2018, pp. 40-43. IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group (PSG), International Primatological Society (IPS), Conservation International (CI), and Bristol Zoological Society, Arlington, VA.
    [Show full text]
  • Panthera Pardus) Range Countries
    Profiles for Leopard (Panthera pardus) Range Countries Supplemental Document 1 to Jacobson et al. 2016 Profiles for Leopard Range Countries TABLE OF CONTENTS African Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus)...................................................... 4 North Africa .................................................................................................. 5 West Africa ................................................................................................... 6 Central Africa ............................................................................................. 15 East Africa .................................................................................................. 20 Southern Africa ........................................................................................... 26 Arabian Leopard (P. p. nimr) ......................................................................... 36 Persian Leopard (P. p. saxicolor) ................................................................... 42 Indian Leopard (P. p. fusca) ........................................................................... 53 Sri Lankan Leopard (P. p. kotiya) ................................................................... 58 Indochinese Leopard (P. p. delacouri) .......................................................... 60 North Chinese Leopard (P. p. japonensis) ..................................................... 65 Amur Leopard (P. p. orientalis) ..................................................................... 67 Javan Leopard
    [Show full text]
  • Ciervo Colorado
    Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal CIERVO COLORADO Flickriver. 2014. www.flickriver.com www.produccion-animal.com.ar Volver a: Producción de ciervos EASTERN EUROPEAN RED DEER (Cervus elaphus hippelaphus) Ciervo colorado de los cárpatos - cráneo - / SKULL ~ Original = (3800 x 2328). SINONIMIA EASTERN EUROPEAN RED DEER: Carpathian Red Deer, european red deer, common deer CIERVO COLORADO de los CÁRPATOS: ciervo rojo, ciervo común, ciervo real, ciervo noble, rela, venado común, ciervo, venado, VEADO VERMELHO EUROPEU-ORIENTAL: cervo vermelho dos cárpatos, cervo comum, veado CLASIFICACIÓN ZOOLÓGICA Cervus elaphus hippelaphus (Erxleben 1777) Orden: ..............Artiodactyla Owen, 1848 (= Cetartiodactyla) (Artiodáctilos) Suborden: .......Ruminantia Scopoli, 1777 (= Rumiantes) Infraorden: .......Pecora Flower, 1883 (= Pecoros ) Familia: ...........Cervidae Goldfuss, 1820 (= Cérvidos= Ciervos) Subfamilia: .....Cervinae (True Deer, Old World Deer) Tribu:................Cervini Género: ............Cervus Linnaeus, 1758 Esta especie es posiblemente el cérvido por antonomasia, y el más buscado por los cazadores de todo el mun- do a causa de su espectacular cornamenta, la misma que, sumada a la hermosa tonalidad alazán de su pelaje, lo torna como uno de los animales más bellos de todo el mundo. Desde su patria de origen, Eurasia, fue trasplantado hacia diversos rincones del mundo con fines venatorios. DISTRIBUCIÓN El Ciervo Rojo es una especie paleártica occidental. Más recientemente, la especie se ha introducido en muchos países de todo el mundo,
    [Show full text]