What Constitutes Doing Business 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Constitutes Doing Business 2020 WHAT CONSTITUTES DOING BUSINESS By a Corporation in States Foreign to the State of its Incorporation Articles, statutory provisions and cases dealing with the necessity of qualification by corporations doing business in foreign states, selected from the records of CT Corporation System, and presented for the convenience of members of the Bar. © 2020, C T Corporation, A Wolters Kluwer Company™. All rights reserved. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 THREE KINDS OF DOING BUSINESS 3 PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO QUALIFY 7 Suits By Unqualified Foreign Corporations 7 Effect of Subsequent Qualification 14 Defense of Suits 17 Validity of Corporate Acts 19 Counterclaims 20 Suits By Assignees and Successors 23 Personal Liability 26 Monetary Penalties 29 Statutory Citations 32 STATUTORY “DOING BUSINESS” DEFINITIONS APPLICABLE TO ORDINARY BUSINESS CORPORATIONS 35 The Model Act Provision 35 The Revised Model Act Provision 36 Alabama 37 Alaska 37 Arizona 38 Arkansas 38 California 38 Colorado 39 Connecticut 40 Delaware 40 District of Columbia 41 Florida 42 Georgia 43 Hawaii 44 Idaho 44 Illinois 45 Indiana 45 iii iv Contents Iowa 46 Kansas 46 Kentucky 47 Louisiana 47 Maine 48 Maryland 48 Massachusetts 49 Michigan 50 Minnesota 50 Mississippi 51 Missouri 51 Montana 52 Nebraska 53 Nevada 54 New Hampshire 55 New Jersey 55 New Mexico 55 New York 56 North Carolina 56 North Dakota 57 Ohio 58 Oklahoma 58 Oregon 59 Pennsylvania 59 Rhode Island 60 South Carolina 61 South Dakota 61 Tennessee 61 Texas 62 Utah 63 Vermont 64 Virginia 65 Washington 66 West Virginia 67 Wisconsin 68 Wyoming 69 Puerto Rico 69 Virgin Islands 70 Alberta 70 Contents v British Columbia 71 Manitoba 72 New Brunswick 72 Newfoundland 73 Northwest Territories 73 Nova Scotia 74 Nunavut 74 Ontario 74 Prince Edward Island 75 Quebec 75 Saskatchewan 76 Yukon Territory 76 STATUTORY “DOING BUSINESS” PROVISIONS LIMITED TO LENDING MONEY ON SECURITY 79 SPECIFIC DOING BUSINESS ACTIVITIES 81 Introduction 81 Interstate and Foreign Commerce 82 Isolated Transactions 88 Corporate Secondary Activities 93 In General 93 Advertising 94 Bank Accounts 96 Books And Records 97 Maintaining an Office 98 Maintaining and Defending Suits 100 Meetings in State 101 Preliminary Acts 102 Holding Interests in Resident Businesses 104 Franchise Operations 104 Holding Companies 107 Parent And Subsidiary Corporations 108 Partnerships, LLCs, and Joint Ventures 111 Contracting 114 Federal Contracts 117 Subcontracting 119 Submitting Bids 120 vi Contents Credit 121 Collecting Debts 121 Extending Credit 123 Lending Money On Security 124 Entertainment 130 Broadcasting 130 Exhibition of Films 131 Professional Sporting Exhibitions And Games 131 Production of Films and Shows 132 Leasing 133 Leasing Personal Property 133 Leasing Real Property 137 Oil and Gas Leases 139 Manufacturing 141 Performing Services 142 In General 142 Correspondence Schools 146 Field Warehousing 146 Installation of Machinery and Equipment 147 Research Work 150 Transportation Companies 151 Property Ownership 153 Personal Property Ownership 153 Processing 155 Purchasing 156 Real Property Ownership 158 Sales 161 Commission Merchants and Brokers 161 Conditional Sales 161 Sales from Trucks 162 Sales of Repossessed Goods 163 Sales of Samples 165 Sales of Securities 166 Sales Through Brokers 168 Shipments on Consignment 169 Show Rooms 173 Solicitation 173 Contents vii Specialty Salesmen 177 Subscription Sales 180 Selling Over the Internet 180 DOING BUSINESS IN 183 Canada 183 Guam 184 Puerto Rico 184 The Virgin Islands 185 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES 187 INTRODUCTION When a corporation does business outside of the state in which it was organized, it may be required to “qualify”—i.e., to obtain a certificate of authority and to appoint a resident agent upon whom process may be served. Although the corporation laws of every state require foreign cor- porations doing business in the state to qualify, no law contains a com- prehensive definition of the term “doing business.” What constitutes doing business within the meaning of qualification requirements is the question which this book attempts to answer. The risks of failure to qualify are great. In all states, unqualified foreign corporations doing intrastate business are denied access to state courts. An unqualified foreign corporation is also subject to fines, and, in several states, its directors, officers or agents may be fined. These sanctions are discussed under the heading “Penalties for Failure to Qualify.” The statutes of most states list certain activities in which a corporation may engage without qualifying. Some states also define activities which will require qualification. These statutory provisions are reproduced in this book and should be examined before a decision is reached as to whether or not qualification is required. Most states have adopted either the Model Business Corporation Act or the Revised Model Business Corporation Act. Therefore, the provisions of both of these Model Acts dealing with activities requiring qualification and penalties for not qualifying are set forth and discussed in the follow- ing chapters. In addition to what constitutes doing business within the United States, this book contains chapters on doing business in Canada, Guam, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. The statutes defining certain activities that do or do not require qualification for Canada, the Canadian provinces, and territories, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands are reproduced. To a very large extent, the answers to doing business questions are found in court decisions. These decisions have been accumulated and analyzed and form the basis for the articles in the section entitled, “Spe- cific Doing Business Activities.” There are three kinds of doing business questions. One question is whether a foreign corporation doing business in a state will be subject to the personal jurisdiction of the state’s courts. The second is whether a foreign corporation will be subject to taxation. The third is whether it will be subject to the state’s qualification requirements. The first chapter, 1 2 Introduction “Three Kinds of Doing Business,” looks at the differences between these three types. It may be noted that business corporations are not the only type of business entity that are required to qualify before doing business in a for- eign state. Nonprofit corporations, limited liability companies, limited partnerships and limited liability partnerships are among others that are subject to a qualification requirement. The chapter entitled “Limited Lia- bility Companies” addresses some doing business issues related to that type of business entity. However, this book deals mainly with foreign business corporations. When dealing with any other business entity the statutes and case law dealing with the issue of what constitutes doing business and the penalties for failure to qualify for that specific business entity type must be consulted. WHAT CONSTITUTES DOING BUSINESS is presented as a service to the Bar. The information it contains has been gathered together to provide a con- venient reference in a difficult area. It is hoped that it will prove helpful both to the attorney familiar with the field and to the attorney who is only occasionally concerned with corporate work. THREE KINDS OF DOING BUSINESS When a corporation does business outside of its state of incorporation, it may find itself: (1) subject to taxation by the state, (2) subject to service of process and suit in the state, or (3) required to qualify to do business in the state. The level of business activity that will constitute doing business is different for each category. In Filmakers Releasing Organ. v. Realart Pictures,1 the court noted that “This much seems to be clear . the greatest amount of business activity is required to subject a corporation to the state’s statutory qualification requirements.”2 Therefore, where a corporation’s activities in a state are sufficient to require qualification, it follows that the corporation will also be amenable to service of process and to being taxed by the state. Some corporation laws specifically state that their doing business defi- nitions should not be used in determining if a corporation is doing busi- ness for any other purpose. Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Vermont provide that their doing business definition sections do not apply in determining the contacts or activities that may subject a foreign corporation to service of process or taxation in the state.3 Colorado, Delaware, and Utah state that their doing business definitions do not apply to the question of whether a foreign corporation is subject to service of process and suit.4 Nevada and Virginia exclude personal jurisdiction from their definition.5 Minnesota and New Hampshire exclude taxation.6 The District of Columbia, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Pennsylvania, and Washington exclude service of process, taxa- tion or regulation under state law and New York excludes service of 1. 374 S.W. 2d 535 (Mo. App. 1964). 2. See also: Wagner and Wagner Auto Sales, Inc. v. Tarro, 889 A.2d 875 (Conn. App. 2006), Si- newellan Corp. v. Farmers Bank of Delaware, 345 A. 2d 430 (Del. Super. 1975); Alliance Steel, Inc. v. Piland, 134 P.3d 669 (Kan. App. 2006); Marco Leather Co. v. Argentinas, 617 N.Y.S. 2d 617 (Sup. 1994); Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Brown & Bigelow, Inc., 104 F. Supp. 716 (S.D.N.Y. 1952); State v. Ford Motor Co., 38 S.E. 2d 242 (S.C. 1946); Questech, Inc. v. Liteco, AG, 735 F.Supp. 187 (E.D. Va. 1990); contra; Marcus v. J.R. Watkins Co., 188 So. 2d 543 (Ala. 1966). 3. Code of Georgia Annotated, Sec. 14-2-1501; Kentucky Revised Statutes, Sec. 14A.9-010; Michigan Compiled Laws, Sec. 450.2012; Revised Statutes of Nebraska, Sec. 21-20,105; New Jer- sey Statutes Annotated, Sec. 14A:13-3; North Dakota Century Code Annotated, Sec. 10-19.1-143; Oklahoma Statutes Annotated, Title 18, Sec. 1132; Vermont Statutes Annotated, Title 11A, Sec. 15.01.
Recommended publications
  • In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division
    Case 2:08-cv-00462-DF -CE Document 1 Filed 12/04/08 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION LEON STAMBLER, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08cv462 § MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC; § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & § SMITH INCORPORATED; THE CHARLES § SCHWAB CORPORATION; CHARLES § SCHWAB & CO, INC.; CHARLES § SCHWAB BANK; E*TRADE FINANCIAL § CORPORATION; E*TRADE BANK; § FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES, LLC; § NATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC; § FMR LLC; MORGAN STANLEY; § MORGAN STANLEY & CO. § INCORPORATED; JACK HENRY & § ASSOCIATES, INC.; METAVANTE § TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; METAVANTE § CORPORATION; PAYPAL, INC.; § AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY; § AMERICAN BANK OF COMMERCE; § BB&T CORPORATION; BRANCH § BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY; THE § COLONIAL BANCGROUP, INC.; § COLONIAL BANK; FIRST NATIONAL § BANK GROUP, INC.; FIRST NATIONAL § BANK; HSBC NORTH AMERICA § HOLDINGS INC.; HSBC USA INC.; HSBC § BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; § HSBC NATIONAL BANK USA; § LEGACYTEXAS GROUP, INC.; § LEGACYTEXAS BANK; THE PNC § FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.; § PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; § PNC BANK, DELAWARE; PROSPERITY § BANCSHARES, INC.; PROSPERITY § BANK; STERLING BANCSHARES, INC.; § STERLING BANK; SUNTRUST BANKS, § INC.; SUNTRUST BANK; TEXAS § CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.; TEXAS § CAPITAL BANK, NATIONAL § 1 Case 2:08-cv-00462-DF -CE Document 1 Filed 12/04/08 Page 2 of 13 ASSOCIATION; U.S. BANCORP; U.S. § BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; § ZIONS BANCORPORATION; ZIONS § FIRST NATIONAL BANK; and AMEGY § BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION § § Defendants. § § PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT Plaintiff LEON STAMBLER files this Original Complaint against the above-named Defendants, alleging as follows: I. THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff LEON STAMBLER (“Stambler”) is an individual residing in Parkland, Florida. 2. Defendant MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC.
    [Show full text]
  • DESCRIPTORS Other Testimony Is Included from Several People Who
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 219 711 CG 016 135 TITLE Exploitation of Children. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Juvenile Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary. United States Senate, Ninety-Seventh Congress, First Session on Problems of Exploited Children. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. Senate Committee on the Judiciary. REPORT NO Senate-J-97-78 PUB DATE 5 Nov 81 NOTE 168p.; Paper copy not available due to small print size. EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Adolescents; Child Abuse; *Children; *Child Welfare; *Delinquent Rehabilitation; Drug Addiction; Family Problems; Hearings; Juvenile Courts; *Runaways; Sexuality; Violence; *Youth Problems IDENTIFIERS *Juvenile Justice System ABSTRACT The proceedings of this hearing on the exploitation of children deal with the problems of children and adolescents who run away from home. Family problems and abuse that cause these children to leave home are described by former runaway witnesses. Other testimony is included from several people who work with runaway youths and describe programs to help adolescents who are on the street facing such problems as child pornography and child prostitution. Current laws dealing with the runaway problem are discussed and the need for improvement in the juvenile justice system is emphasized. The appendix contains a letter to the Attorney General and his response about the Justice Department's involvement in the exploitation of children as well as a statement by the Department of Health and Human Services on this problem. (JAC) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN HARD COPY NOT AVAILABLE HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON JUVENILE JUSTICE OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY (NJ UNITED STATES SENATE NINETY-SEVENTH CONGRESS L4.1 FIRST SESSION ON PROBLEMS OF EXPLOITED CHILDREN NOVEMBER 5, 1981 Serial No.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrupted Youth
    COURIER-JOURNAL Wednesday, June 13,1984 13 ^*^^^^p~m*~^K*nm Mercy Graduation third cmtficfitve &ip and ter of the late Frank and ready fe*4Mtirfban«hi|R. Vi Cuddy Both are Scheduled June 20 AmancanaiidlrWi Aobarnians Our Lady of Mercy High study liberal arts at the Uni­ School's 53rd annual gradua­ versity of Notre Dame. She tatty CavfiV-of St Of Bcnadetfe Fisher tion exercises will take place has been an editor of Ambrose,* whose father Holy Ghost Rochester, I at 8 p.m., Wednesday, June Mercedes, the school's liter­ was the Jate fir Clanmse have no line excepting that 20, at the Eastman Theatre ary magazine, and a reporter the aura knows how to with Bishop Matthew H. for the school newspaper, ajsjoy HmVBl That local Clark delivering the com­ Quill. She also is a member {hpaMKtftt ASM! dniin mencement address. of the National Honor Soci­ jnrgg^g ttfihod bgrrutcx of The bishop also will cele­ ety and co-captain of the BttemHc, INBM Pratt brate the graduates' Rose varsity track and field team. was an her ihirtf *np with Mass Wednesday, June 19, in Paradies of Pittsford plans the Mercy Motherhouse, to major in English and of St ioaeph't, Rush just according to Sister Judith communications at LeMoyne Tiros* SL John Heberle, principal. College. She also is on the as, la a "Let's Seniors Maria Gerace and Mercedes staff amd was news evarymjag'' person Karen Paradies are editor of Quill. She was a S took enough girls' valedictorian and member of this year's •;.: -<A ?.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Another Trash Tournament Written by Eliza Grames, Melanie Keating, Virginia Ruiz, Joe Nutter, and Rhea Nelson
    Not Another Trash Tournament Written by Eliza Grames, Melanie Keating, Virginia Ruiz, Joe Nutter, and Rhea Nelson PACKET ONE 1. This character’s coach says that although it “takes all kinds to build a freeway” he is not equipped for this character’s kind of weirdness close the playoffs. This character lost his virginity to the homecoming queen and the prom queen at the same time and says he’ll be(*) “scoring more than baskets” at an away game and ends up in a teacher’s room wearing a thong which inspires the entire basketball team to start wearing them at practice. When Carrie brags about dating this character, Heather, played by Ashanti, hits her in the back of the head with a volleyball before Brittany Snow’s character breaks up the fight. Four girls team up to get back at this high school basketball star for dating all of them at once. For 10 points, name this character who “must die.” ANSWER: John Tucker [accept either] 2. The hosts of this series that premiered in 2003 once crafted a combat robot named Blendo, and one of those men served as a guest judge on the 2016 season of BattleBots. After accidentally shooting a penny into a fluorescent light on one episode of this show, its cast had to be evacuated due to mercury vapor. On a “Viewers’ Special” episode of this show, its hosts(*) attempted to sneeze with their eyes open, before firing cigarette butts from a rifle. This show’s hosts produced the short-lived series Unchained Reaction, which also aired on the Discovery Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Registration Application Online at Executive Order on Privacy and State Data System 24 Hours a Day
    MARYLAND Combined Registration 2015 FORM Application CRA SECTION A: All applicants must complete this section. 1 a. 9 digit Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN) (See instructions.) b. Social Security Number (SSN) of owner, officer or agent responsible for taxes (Required by law.) 2. Legal name of dealer, employer, corporation or owner 3. Trade name (if different from Legal name of dealer, employer, corporation or owner.) 4. Street Address of physical business location (P.O. box not acceptable) City County State ZIP code (9 digits if known) Telephone number Fax number E-mail address 5. Mailing address (P.O. box acceptable) City State ZIP code (9 digits if known) 6. Reason for applying: New business Additional location(s) Merger Purchased going business Re-activate/Re-open (Check all that apply.) Change of entity Remit use tax on purchases Reorganization Other (describe) _________________________ 7. Previous owner’s name: First Name or Corporation Name Last Name Title Telephone number Street address (P.O. box acceptable) City State ZIP code (9 digits if known) 8. Type of registration: (must check appropriate box(es)) Maryland Number if registered: 9. Type of ownership: (Check one box) a. Sales and use tax _________________________ a. Sole proprietorship f. Non-Maryland corporation b. Sales and use tax exemption b. Partnership g. Governmental for nonprofit organizations _________________________ c. Nonprofit organization h. Fiduciary c. Tire recycling fee _________________________ d. Maryland corporation i. Business trust d. Admissions & amusement tax _________________________ e. Limited liability company e. Employer withholding tax _________________________ 10. Date first sales made f. Unemployment insurance _________________________ in Maryland: (mmddyyyy) ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ g.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Rape: a Guide to State Laws and Reporting Requirements
    Statutory Rape: A Guide to State Laws and Reporting Requirements Prepared for: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services Prepared by: Asaph Glosser Karen Gardiner Mike Fishman The Lewin Group December 15, 2004 Acknowledgements Work on this project was funded by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a contract to The Lewin Group. This report benefited greatly from the oversight and input of Jerry Silverman, the ASPE Project Officer. In addition, we would like to acknowledge the assistance of a number of reviewers. Sarah Brown, Eva Klain, and Brenda Rhodes Miller provided us with valuable guidance and insights into legal issues and the policy implications of the laws and reporting requirements. Their comments improved both the content and the organization of the paper. At The Lewin Group, Shauna Brodsky reviewed drafts and provided helpful comments. The Authors Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................ES-1 A. Background...........................................................................................................................ES-1 1. Criminal Laws............................................................................................................... ES-1 2. Reporting Requirements.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Doing Business in Maryland
    Doing Business in Maryland: Outlook 2018 A supplement to Subscribe Today! Real Estate Insider Child abuse lawsuit Report says high-end apartments doing well, Victim sues Prince George’s County school system, *Maria Johnson Darby plus other deals, leases and relocations. 9A alleging hire made despite criminal record. 10A Katie Allston, LCSW-C *Sen. Cheryl C. Kagan Get Maryland’s daily statewide source for business,Amy E. Askew law,Dr. Rita Rastogi Kalyani government and real estate news. 2017 Debra Reznick Attman Dr. Shohreh A. Kaynama Mythili “Lee” Bachu Marguerite O. Kelley Zoa D. Barnes Sharon Krevor-Weisbaum Angie Barnett Bonnie Krosin Walakewon Blegay Sharon Kroupa Dr. Mary Way Bolt Bonnie N. Luna Tammy Brumwell Bresnahan Ganesha Martin *Alison Gates Brown Robin McKinney Rev. Lettie Moses Carr, Esq. Jennifer Meyer Nona Carroll Thursday, April 7, 2016 Volume 127 | Number 128 TheDailyRecord.com Karen C. Miller Karen S. Cherry Robin Motter-Mast, D.O. Maryland’s trusted source of business, legal and government news 2017 Kathleen M. Murphy Hon. Karen Murphy Jensen Martha Nathanson Candace Breland Osunsade Bill jailing Cecilia B. Paizs Leadership *Hon. Nicole Pastore-Klein ‘Black Panther’ a hot item Del. Edith J. Patterson hosts of in w Katherine Pinkard Md. comic book stores report strong interest in Ta-Nehisi Coates series La June A. Poole Cynthia Blake Sanders Ronnie Lapinsky Sax teen parties Dr. Kim Schatzel Marianne Schmitt Hellauer Nichelle D. Schoultz Tina M. Corner weakened *Carol Coughlin *Joan Webb Scornaienchi Corryne Deliberto Stephanie L. Shack Key senator concerned Cari DeSantis Indira K. Sharma Kimberly Conway Michele A Shermak, MD, FACS college students could Dumpson, Esq., CFRE *Terry D.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Relief Programs for Businesses and Employers
    Last Updated August 31, 2020 COVID-19 Relief Programs for Businesses and Employers paul, weiss, rifkind, wharton & garrison llp table of contents 01 | Alabama 40 | Louisiana 70 | Ohio 02 | Alaska 41 | Maine 73 | Oklahoma 02 | Arizona 43 | Maryland 75 | Oregon 04 | Arkansas 44 | Massachusetts 75 | Pennsylvania 05 | California 47 | Michigan 79 | Rhode Island 21 | Colorado 50 | Minnesota 80 | South Carolina 22 | Connecticut 51 | Mississippi 82 | South Dakota 23 | Delaware 51 | Missouri 83 | Tennessee 24 | Florida 54 | Montana 85 | Texas 25 | Georgia 55 | Nebraska 86 | Utah 26 | Hawaii 56 | Nevada 90 | Vermont 27 | Idaho 58 | New Hampshire 91 | Virginia 27 | Illinois 58 | New Jersey 94 | Washington State 31 | Indiana 63 | New Mexico 95 | West Virginia 31 | Iowa 64 | New York 96 | Wisconsin 34 | Kansas 67 | North Carolina 97 | Wyoming 38 | Kentucky 68 | North Dakota 9 8 | District of Columbia © 2020 Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. In some jurisdictions, this publication may be considered attorney advertising. Past representations are no guarantee of future outcomes. COVID-19 Relief Programs for Businesses and Employers Alabama State-Wide Programs . Agricultural Stabilization Program . Qualifying Alabama individuals and businesses in various agricultural industries including (i) cattle production, (ii) meat processing, (iii) poultry farming, (iv) catfish processing, (v) fruit and vegetable processing, (vi) food production pursuant to the USDA’s Coronavirus Food Assistance Program, and (vii) plant nurseries are eligible for funds related to business lost and/or protective equipment and supplies purchased in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. Funds available vary based on agricultural industry. Meat processing, catfish processing and fruit and vegetable processing available now.
    [Show full text]
  • Committed to Our Communities
    Johns Hopkins Committed to Our Communities MARYLAND AND BEYOND COVER: The Johns Hopkins Hospital Billings Dome in the context of Baltimore City 80 Broad Street Room 611 appleseed New York, NY 10004 This report was prepared by Appleseed, a New York City-based consulting firm, P: 212.964.9711 founded in 1993, that provides economic research and analysis and economic F: 212.964.2415 development planning services to government, non-profit and corporate clients. www.appleseedinc.com MARYLAND AND BEYOND Committed to our Communities April 2015 4 COMMITTED TO OUR COMMUNITIES Contents 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17 INTRODUCTION 19 PART ONE / Johns Hopkins in Maryland and beyond – an overview 29 PART TWO / Johns Hopkins as an enterprise 59 PART THREE / Contributing to the development of Maryland’s human capital 71 PART FOUR / Maryland’s leading research institution 83 PART FIVE / Improving health in Maryland and beyond 91 PART SIX / A global enterprise 99 PART SEVEN / Innovation and entrepreneurship at Johns Hopkins 113 PART EIGHT / Investing in and serving our communities 131 PART NINE / The impact of affiliated institutions 137 PART TEN / Johns Hopkins and the future of Maryland’s economy 141 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS MARYLAND AND BEYOND 5 6 COMMITTED TO OUR COMMUNITIES Executive Summary Johns Hopkins as an enterprise • In FY 2014, Johns Hopkins spent nearly $213.6 million on construction and renova- Johns Hopkins is Maryland’s largest private em- tion, including $150.1 million paid to con- ployer, a major purchaser of goods and services, tractors and subcontractors based in Maryland. a sponsor of construction projects and a magnet This investment directly supported 1,104 FTE for students and visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • PB DATE Dec BO
    DOCUMENT RESUME A 'ED 203 274 CG 015 276 Homeless Youth: The Saga of "Pushouts" and . "Throwaways" in America. Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-Sixth Congress, Second Session; INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. Senate Committee on the Judiciary. PB DATE Dec BO . NOTE 2520: Not available in paper ;copy dui to small 4/41ILAHLE FROM Superintendent.of Documents,'M.S. Government Printing Offitei Washington, DC '20402. EDRS PRICE MFOtlilus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS: *Adolescents: *Child. AbuSe:',,,Chi.lid,Neglect: Family Orobiems:.HelpinT:RelatiOnship:', Juvenile Courts; *Parent Child RelatiOnthip: PrOblem.Zolving: *RuhawayWViolencei *youth Rrograms juisTgApT This report of the-,SenateSubcommittee,on the Comstitution examines the' )henOmenon OehOieljets yoUthoinCluding the population, fheirfamiliese. survival tactics, the availabiLityof services, and futureoutlOokSA SectiOnretriewingths:legal constraints imposed on young people Aidhaffect their, ability to 1iVe: on their own.,it folloWecf,b/ a review of the agenclesserving: 11,0MelesSyouth With dita,:aimpressionSdoliected:from;0 Interviews.. A:desdpiptiOnof runaway litogratsthroughoUt.the:United Stites. ncluded. Data frOm ou.6'sits pto.greOnyiSitsanUinterviei0 with. agency personnel,,policeofficets,:and InvenileAUstiCe, 'corrections, public assistanCes, mental health4 and childcare personnel, are reported. 4:41 .are .'also included frbm case reOardSof runaways and interviews )Conducted.with-homeless youth about. the quality of their liveti StirViValHtethrigues,'difficult,ies'endOuntered in obtaining,foodo shelterand:'emPloyment and their. hopes for*Oefuture.HS'lle appendices contain the Juvenile Justice and.:Runtway yoUth acts and amendments, additiOnalreports on hoieless youth and child-abuse, and interview ,torms for agency'Tersonnel and.youthS.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor O'malley, County Executive Leggett Announce Region's First Clean Energy Center
    Press Release: Maryland Receives Grant to Help Strengthen Underperfo... http://www.governor.maryland.gov/pressreleases/090302b.asp Maryland Receives Grant to Help Strengthen Underperforming Schools National Governor’s Association grant is funded by Gates and Prudential Foundations ANNAPOLIS, MD (March 2, 2009) – Governor Martin O’Malley announced today that Maryland has received a grant from the National Governors Association (NGA) for a one-year project designed to spur improvement in chronically low-performing schools. The grant, one of just four funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Prudential Foundation, will provide the State with up to $150,000, plus assistance in research and development of new strategies to increase academic achievement in underperforming schools. The NGA’s Center for Best Practices will assist Maryland in the development of its plan. “America’s number one public school system must do everything it can to remain the best in the nation while ensuring that every Maryland child receives a quality education regardless of where they live,” said Governor O’Malley. “The National Governor’s Association shares these principles, and we are grateful for this support. Their partnership in this endeavor demonstrates that we all have a stake in the future of our children.” Maryland has gained a well-deserved reputation for its high academic standards and strong accountability measures, and those measures have paid off over time. All 24 school systems across the state have posted steady academic improvement for five straight years, and Education Week Magazine recently cited the state’s public school system as the nation’s best.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of State Speed Laws
    DOT HS 810 826 August 2007 Summary of State Speed Laws Tenth Edition Current as of January 1, 2007 This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. If trade or manufacturers' names or products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................iii Missouri ......................................................138 Alabama..........................................................1 Montana ......................................................143 Alaska.............................................................5 Nebraska .....................................................150 Arizona ...........................................................9 Nevada ........................................................157 Arkansas .......................................................15 New
    [Show full text]