Shakespeare's Essays

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shakespeare's Essays ‘After London is an imaginative foray into the evolutionary results of OR WILDAFTER ENGLAND LONDON; ecological catastrophe: the Victorian Oryx and Crake. A quasi-medieval SHAKESPEARE’S romance set in a re-pastoralised England, and simultaneously a gem of avant-garde science fiction, Richard Jefferies’ masterpiece has been ESSAYS expertly brought back into the limelight by Frost’s fine scholarly edition.’ John Plotz, Brandeis University RICHARD JEFFERIES RICHARD Sampling Montaigne from A scholarly edition of a significant and exciting late Victorian science fiction novel Hamlet to The Tempest Richard Jefferies’ After London is uncanny and intriguing, an adventure story, quest romance, dystopia and Darwinian novel rolled into one, but also a pioneering work of Victorian science fiction. Imagining a mysterious natural catastrophe that plunges its people into a barbaric future, Jefferies remarkable novel drowns and destroys London and depicts a challenging ‘Wild England’ dominated by nature and filled with evolved animals and devolved humans. Of its time but also distinctively modern, After London can, in its uneasy expression of Victorian and post-Victorian anxieties about industrial development, urbanisation, natural resources and climate, be regarded as one of the first novels of the Anthropocene. This new critical edition provides a detailed introduction situating After Edited by Mark Frost London in relevant social and political contexts, considering its place in Jefferies’ wider canon and its relations to a range of literary genres, and offering a series of readings designed to encourage readers to fully appreciate the novel’s productive strangeness. The edition is supported by a Jefferies chronology, further reading list and two supplementary pieces of Jefferies’s writings. Mark Frost is Senior Lecturer in English Literature at the University of Portsmouth. He writes widely on environment, literature and culture in Cover image: Tannenwald I, Gustav Klimt, 1901 © Erich Lessing / AKG London Cover design: www.hayesdesign.co.uk ISBN: 978-1-4744-0239-2 edinburghuniversitypress.com Peter G. Platt Shakespeare’s Essays 66436_Platt.indd436_Platt.indd i 221/07/201/07/20 11:15:15 PPMM For my mother, Gee Gee Platt (aka Gram) 66436_Platt.indd436_Platt.indd iiii 221/07/201/07/20 11:15:15 PPMM Shakespeare’s Essays Sampling Montaigne from Hamlet to The Tempest Peter G. Platt 66436_Platt.indd436_Platt.indd iiiiii 221/07/201/07/20 11:15:15 PPMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © Peter G. Platt, 2020 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun – Holyrood Road 12(2f) Jackson’s Entry Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 10.5/13 Adobe Sabon by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd, and printed and bound in Great Britain. A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 6340 9 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 6342 3 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 6343 0 (epub) The right of Peter G. Platt to be identifi ed as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). 66436_Platt.indd436_Platt.indd iivv 221/07/201/07/20 11:15:15 PPMM Contents Acknowledgements vi Texts and Titles ix Introduction: ‘Were my mind settled, I would not essay but resolve myself’ 1 1. Knowing and Being in Montaigne and Shakespeare 24 2. ‘A little thing doth divert and turn us’: Fictions, Mourning, and Playing in ‘Of Diverting or Diversion’ and Hamlet 45 3. Mingled Yarns and Hybrid Worlds: ‘We Taste Nothing Purely’, Measure for Measure, and All’s Well That Ends Well 77 4. ‘We are both father and mother together in this generation’: Physical and Intellectual Creations in ‘Of the Affection of Fathers to Their Children’ and King Lear 109 5. Custom, Otherness, and the Fictions of Mastery: ‘Of the Caniballes’ and The Tempest 129 Epilogue: Shakespeare before the Essays 154 Works Cited 169 Index 185 66436_Platt.indd436_Platt.indd v 221/07/201/07/20 11:15:15 PPMM Acknowledgements This book came into being as the result of two conversations. First, my Columbia colleague Jean Howard convinced me to break my Shake- speare and Montaigne project into two: an edited selection of John Florio’s 1603 English translation of the Essays and a scholarly mono- graph on the Montaigne–Shakespeare connection. I am very grateful to Jean for that early pep talk. Second, upon learning that Stephen Greenblatt was simultaneously starting to work on a Florio edition, I asked him if he wanted to combine our efforts. Thankfully, he agreed, and working with him on what became Shakespeare’s Montaigne (New York Review Books, 2014) was a true delight, personally and intellectually. This book, then, is a companion volume of sorts to our Florio edition. Barnard Provost Linda Bell has provided crucial institutional support throughout this project. Butler Library at Columbia, Wollman Library (now the Milstein Center) at Barnard, Doe Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and the San Francisco Public Library (including its affi liation with the amazing Link+ catalogue) have provided me with essential resources. The Mechanics’ Institute Library in San Francisco has, for over twenty years, been my scholarly home away from home; most of this book was written there, and I am grateful to my offi cemate at Mechanics’, Bill Littmann, for his advice, patience and (mostly) good jokes. Thanks to Michelle Houston of Edinburgh University Press for believing in this project and helping me to see it through to publication and to Camilla Rockwood for superlative copy-editing. I am very thankful for twenty-fi ve years of teaching Barnard and Columbia students, who have kept me learning about and essay- ing Montaigne and Shakespeare. Thank you as well to the graduate teaching assistants who have helped me with my Shakespeare classes and who manage to be both outstanding scholars and teachers: John 66436_Platt.indd436_Platt.indd vvii 221/07/201/07/20 11:15:15 PPMM Acknowledgements vii Bird, Gabriel Bloomfi eld, Jessica Forbes, John Kuhn, Alexander Lash, Bernadette Myers, Seth Williams, and Kevin Windhauser. Thanks yet again to former graduate students (and now tenured titans) Alan Farmer, Zack Lesser, Doug Pfeiffer, Ben Robinson, Tiffany Werth, and Adam Zucker for making me proud and making me smarter. My Columbia colleagues have been incredibly supportive during this project: thanks to Julie Crawford, Kathy Eden, Molly Murray, and especially Jim Shapiro and Alan Stewart. Barnard’s ‘Renaissance wing’ is essential to my scholarly and general happiness: I am grateful to Rachel Eisendrath, Achsah Guibbory, Kim Hall, and Anne Prescott. Liz Auran, Jim Basker, Chris Baswell, Yvette Christiansë, Pam Cobrin, Pat Denison, Lisa Gordis, Saskia Hamilton, Jennie Kassanoff, Sarah Pasa- dino, Rio Santisteban-Edwards, Wendy Schor-Haim, Timea Szell, and Margaret Vandenburg have helped keep me sane. Bill Sharpe heroically read several versions of this entire book and, crucially, after one memo- rable run and gyro, helped me fi gure out its title. Outside of the Eng- lish Department, my Barnard life has been enriched by Anne Boyman, Marisa Buzzeo, Lisa Hollibaugh, Brian Larkin, Dina Merrer, Nancy Worman, Bill Worthen, Hana Worthen, and especially Peter Connor. Beyond Barnard and Columbia, I send thanks to Joel Altman, Leonard Barkan, Piers Brown, Bradin Cormack, Jeff Dolven, David Kastan, and Pashmina Murthy. Branching out into the world of Montaigne Studies has introduced me to some wonderful colleagues who have provided me with a new scholarly community: Lars Engle, Saul Frampton, Pat- rick Gray, John O’Brien, Phillip Usher, and especially Will Hamlin have made my academic life much more fulfi lling. Finally, thanks to Andrew Auchincloss, Judith Boies, Mark Bridges, Cabot Brown, Robert Christ- man, Howard Fishman, Peter Freedberger, David Gendelman, Ken Joye, John Kurtz, Philippe Lambert, Charles Louderback, Murdock Martin, Richard Michaelis, Anna Murphy, George Olive, Mark Ouweleen, Bill Rappel, Antonio Rossi, Julintip Thirasilpa, Todd West, and Matt Wolf for providing levity and wisdom at just the right moments. My family continues to be my anchor. Thanks to dad and brother Geoff for patiently listening to and encouraging me. My wife, Nancy – herself a translator – has been extremely helpful in my forays into Florio; her love and support have been constant and sustaining. I trust that our son, Jordy – despite our too frequent separations – has no doubts about ‘that singular and loving affection which in my soul I bare unto him’. This book is for my mom, who taught me how to write bet- ter, to obsess over editing, to love books – inside and out. I can no other answer make but thanks, and thanks, and ever thanks. 66436_Platt.indd436_Platt.indd vviiii 221/07/201/07/20 11:15:15 PPMM viii Shakespeare’s Essays Part of Chapter 3 appeared as ‘“The Web of our Life is of a Mingled Yarn”: Mixed Worlds and Kinds in Montaigne’s “We Taste Nothing Purely” and Shakespeare’s All’s Well That Ends Well’, in Shakespeare and Montaigne, ed. Lars Engle, Patrick Gray, and William M. Hamlin (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2021). I thank the Press for permission to include that material here.
Recommended publications
  • Although a Quality Text Will Explore Universal Human Concerns, All Texts
    Although a quality text will explore universal human concerns, all texts are fundamentally influenced by the values of the respective composer’s context, and therefore will not easily transcend time without the act of appropriation. Shakespeare’s play, The Tempest, has enduring value as it both reflects and criticises the standard perspectives of his Jacobean era. Margaret Atwood has effectively appropriated this text within her novel, Hag-Seed, by adapting Shakespeare’s concerns to a modern era and utilising it to critique her own societies context. Atwood transposes the exploration of the treatment of marginalised people from the ostracised figure of Caliban to the disadvantaged group of prisoners that Felix seeks to direct. She also translates Shakespeare’s temporal commentary of gender roles within the patriarchal society of 17th century England as depicted through Miranda, into the feminist character of Anne-Marie. Finally, Atwood has reflected the provocative discoveries made by Prospero, as he experienced a reassessment of previous perspectives in order to evaluate new perceptions, through Felix, who undergoes a similar transformation of self. In this respect, Atwood’s text transcends time through effectively becoming a portal which draws values from the Jacobean era and translates them so that modern audiences can reflect on themselves and their society. PARAGRAPH 1: Shakespeare’s play, The Tempest, explores the colonial expansion that took place during the 17th century and the vexed relationship between the ‘explorers’ and the indigenous, as the impacts of colonialization began to permeate the common beliefs of society. The negative insinuations associated with indigenous groups becomes evident within the text when Prospero, the embodiment of European colonisation, uses a zoomorphic description of Caliban to present him as a creature less than human, “not honoured with human shape” in which Shakespeare satirizes the ethnocentric view of white ‘explorers’.
    [Show full text]
  • Michelangelo Florio and the Famous Sentence: “Venetiawho Sees Not
    Michelangelo Florio and the famous sentence: “Venetia Who sees not Venice cannot esteeme 1 it, but he that sees it, payes well for it” With an introduction of biographical notes on Michelangelo and John Florio [The purpose of this study: this paper will try to demonstrate how the second part of the “sentence” in question had pregnant significance for Michelangelo Florio, in connection with the indignant and irrefutably documented invective that was hurled against Venice by the most famous Italian preacher of the Protestant Reformation, Bernardino Ochino, during Lent of 1542] Wide summary of the 2017 Italian study, with a Documentary Appendix, which contains a letter dated January 23rd, 1552, in Latin, addressed by Michelangelo to W. Cecil (with translation into English and notes by Massimo Oro Nobili); it is absolutely striking to note how concepts and words, written in Latin by Michelangelo (who asked Cecil for mercy for an act of uncleanness), are literally reproduced in English by the Dramatist in Portia‟s fundamental speech on praise of mercy in “The Merchant of Venice”. Summary: Chapter 1. Introduction: some biographical details concerning Michelangelo and John Florio’s life. 1.1 Michelangelo Florio‟s parents. 1.2 Michelangelo Florio‟s origins. 1.3 Michelangelo's birth date, to be determined, in my view, in 1518 - on the basis of the indication provided by Michelangelo himself in his Apologia (p.34 a) - by retroactively calculating 32 years from the date when he “divested” himself of his “Franciscan habit” (on May 6th 1550, according to Michelangelo‟s Apologia, p. 77 a), being such a “divestment” the deeply symbolic act that formally sanctioned the irrevocable discharge of a friar from the Catholic Church - His abjuration, his release from prison and his escape from Rome and Italy, religionis causa.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting John Florio's Translation of Michel De Montaigne's Les
    Translata Proficit : Revisiting John Florio’s translation of Michel de Montaigne’s Les Essais Oana-Alis Zaharia "Dimitrie Cantemir" University, Romania ABSTRACT This paper considers John Florio’s famous translation of Montaigne’s Essays as a source of invaluable insight into the Elizabethan practice and theory of translation. In the letter addressed to the reader, Florio strongly advocates the use of translation as a means of advancing knowledge and developing the language and culture of a nation. Echoing the Elizabethan debate between the defenders and detractors of translation, his preface provides precious information on the various Elizabethan understandings of the role of translation. Casting himself in the role of a “foster-father”, Florio foregrounds the idea of translation as rewriting of the original text into a new creation. While most scholars have emphasised solely Florio’s augmentation of Montaigne’s text and his fondness for addition, paraphrase and alliteration, the present paper intends to demonstrate that this dimension of his translation is frequently complemented by Florio’s tendency to render the text closely, even word for word at times. KEYWORDS : John Florio, Montaigne’s Les Essais , Elizabethan practice and theory of translation, rewriting, fondness for words, literal translation. 1. Introduction 1603 is the year that saw the publication of one of the most popular and influential Elizabethan translations – John Florio’s rendering of Michel de Montaigne’s Les Essais – which proved to be an instant success in Elizabethan England. The translation continued to raise interest and circulate extensively for the next half century being republished in 1613 and 1632. Sederi 22 (2012: 115-136) O.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching the Short Story: a Guide to Using Stories from Around the World. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 397 453 CS 215 435 AUTHOR Neumann, Bonnie H., Ed.; McDonnell, Helen M., Ed. TITLE Teaching the Short Story: A Guide to Using Stories from around the World. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, REPORT NO ISBN-0-8141-1947-6 PUB DATE 96 NOTE 311p. AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock No. 19476: $15.95 members, $21.95 nonmembers). PUB 'TYPE Guides Classroom Use Teaching Guides (For Teacher) (052) Collected Works General (020) Books (010) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Authors; Higher Education; High Schools; *Literary Criticism; Literary Devices; *Literature Appreciation; Multicultural Education; *Short Stories; *World Literature IDENTIFIERS *Comparative Literature; *Literature in Translation; Response to Literature ABSTRACT An innovative and practical resource for teachers looking to move beyond English and American works, this book explores 175 highly teachable short stories from nearly 50 countries, highlighting the work of recognized authors from practically every continent, authors such as Chinua Achebe, Anita Desai, Nadine Gordimer, Milan Kundera, Isak Dinesen, Octavio Paz, Jorge Amado, and Yukio Mishima. The stories in the book were selected and annotated by experienced teachers, and include information about the author, a synopsis of the story, and comparisons to frequently anthologized stories and readily available literary and artistic works. Also provided are six practical indexes, including those'that help teachers select short stories by title, country of origin, English-languag- source, comparison by themes, or comparison by literary devices. The final index, the cross-reference index, summarizes all the comparative material cited within the book,with the titles of annotated books appearing in capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinning Shakespeare
    Spinning Shakespeare By Don Rubin he Yiddish term is mishagas. Craziness. As in “believing that Shakespeare didn’t write Shakespeare is mishagas. Craziness.” Then they point at you, roll Ttheir eyes in a what-can-you-do-with-him kind of way. “We all know he’s a bit strange. We all know he is mishuga.” Now I begin my paper with this very basic lesson in Yiddish – using a term that has transferred quite widely into common English usage – because it is a term too often applied to the Oxfordian cause or, at the very least, the cause which has led so many to have “reasonable doubt” that William of Stratford was actually the writer of the plays of Shake-speare (with or without a hyphen). When I first came to this issue after reading Mark Anderson’s brilliant biography of Oxford, Shakespeare By Another Name, and followed this by reading as widely as I could in this fascinating area, I couldn’t help but notice that every time I tried to share my new enthusiasm with friends and colleagues I really could see their eyes start to roll and I could hear – whether they were Jewish or not – the word mishagas floating somewhere around them. “Oh my God,” they were thinking piteously, “he is crazy.” Sometimes it was innocent family members and sometimes distinguished scholars. But the fact was all seemed united in labeling me mishugana. Like Queen Victoria, I was not amused. After more than forty years as an academ- ic, a former Chair of a distinguished Department of Theatre at York University in Toronto, and co-founder and former Director of the MA and PhD Programs in Theatre Studies at York, I tended to take my scholarship – especially in theatre areas – rather seriously.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannibalism in Contact Narratives and the Evolution of the Wendigo Michelle Lietz
    Eastern Michigan University DigitalCommons@EMU Master's Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations, and Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations Graduate Capstone Projects 3-1-2016 Cannibalism in contact narratives and the evolution of the wendigo Michelle Lietz Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.emich.edu/theses Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Lietz, Michelle, "Cannibalism in contact narratives and the evolution of the wendigo" (2016). Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations. 671. http://commons.emich.edu/theses/671 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses, and Doctoral Dissertations, and Graduate Capstone Projects at DigitalCommons@EMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@EMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cannibalism in Contact Narratives and the Evolution of the Wendigo by Michelle Lietz Thesis Submitted to the Department of English Language and Literature Eastern Michigan University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in Literature Thesis Committee: Abby Coykendall, Ph.D., First Reader Lori Burlingame, Ph.D., Second Reader March 1, 2016 Ypsilanti, Michigan ii Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my kind and caring sisters, and my grounding father. For my mother: thank you for beginning my love of words and for every time reading “one more chapter.” And for every person who has reminded me to guard my spirit during long winters. iii Acknowledgments I am deeply indebted to Dr. Lori Burlingame, for reading all of my papers over and over again, for always letting me take up her office hours with long talks about Alexie, Erdrich, Harjo, Silko and Ortiz, and supporting everything I’ve done with unwavering confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • John Florio and Shakespeare: Life and Language
    On Biography ISSN 2283-8759 DOI 10.13133/2283-8759-2 pp. 109-129 (December 2015) John Florio and Shakespeare: Life and Language Donatella Montini Pour nous, Shakespeare a connu et approché l’Italie, sa langue, sa littérature et sa civilisation, par l’intermédiaire de John Florio. Car […] les deux hommes, le poète et le grammairien, se connaissaient nécessairement. Clara Longworth Chambrun When, in his 1747 annotated edition of Shakespeare’s works, William Warburton declared that “by Holofernes is designed a particular char- acter, a pedant and schoolmaster of our author’s time, one John Florio, a teacher of the Italian tongue in London”1, he certainly could not have imagined that he had inaugurated one of the most intriguing threads within the never-ending quest to find Shakespeare’s ‘traces of life’, literally opening the proverbial Pandora’s box. With his hypothesis Warburton suggested a close connection between the playwright and John Florio (1553-1625), an Italian teacher (Firste Fruites, 1578; Second Frutes, 1591), lexicographer (A World of Words, 1598; Queen Anna’s New World of Words, 1611), translator (Montaigne’s Essays, 1603; Decameron, 1620), recognized as one of the most outstanding interpreters of Italian humanistic culture in Elizabethan England. After Warburton, many other modern critics have been haunted by a sort of ‘magnificent obsession’ to prove the existence of a liaison, both in a biographical and/or in a linguistic perspective, between these two giants of Elizabethan culture2. Gentlemen and courtiers in Queen 1 William Warburton and Alexander Pope, eds, The Works of Shakespear, London, J. and P.
    [Show full text]
  • All About Mentoring Issue 54 Autumn 2020
    ALL ABOUT MENTORINGA PUBLICATION OF SUNY EMPIRE STATE COLLEGE Issue 54 • Autumn 2020 ALL ABOUT MENTORING Issue 54 • Autumn 2020 ALL ABOUT MENTORING ISSUE 54 AUTUMN 2020 Alan Mandell College Professor of Adult Learning and Mentoring Editor Karen LaBarge Senior Staff Assistant for Faculty Development Associate Editor PHOTOGRAPHY The quotes sprinkled throughout this issue of All Photos courtesy of Stock Studios, About Mentoring offer us a glimpse of the ideas and and faculty and staff of SUNY Empire State College, perspectives of Arthur Chickering, founding academic unless otherwise noted. vice president of SUNY Empire State College, whose contributions over decades and decades have left COVER ARTWORK such an indelible mark on so many individuals and By Donna Gaines Triune (Art on Neptune), 2015 institutions interested in students’ learning and their 32” H x 22.5” W, development. (Please see more information about Acrylic/spray paint/ dirt/found plywood Chickering’s work and impact on page 123.) Photo credit: James Graham PRODUCTION Kirk Starczewski Director of Publications Janet Jones Office Assistant 2 (Keyboarding) College Print Shop Send comments, articles or news to: All About Mentoring c/o Alan Mandell SUNY Empire State College 325 Hudson St., 5th Floor New York, NY 10013-1005 646-230-1255 [email protected] Special thanks: Thanks, as always, to our whole SUNY Empire State College community for voices and ideas that make this publication, and so much else, possible. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Editorial — Our World ................................................................ 2 Art and Activism at SUNY Empire State College ....................80 Alan Mandell, Manhattan and Saratoga Springs Menoukha Robin Case, Mentor Emerita, Saratoga Springs Connecting Community Scholarship and Service ..................
    [Show full text]
  • TEXTUAL CONVERSATIONS: MODULE a ESSAY: How Has the Context of Each Text Influenced Your Understanding of the Intentional Connections Between Them?
    TEXTUAL CONVERSATIONS: MODULE A ESSAY: How has the context of each text influenced your understanding of the intentional connections between them? Textual conversations enable a re-imagination of universal ideas, prompting responders to gain a deeper understanding of the enduring desire for power inherent to the human condition. William Shakespeare’s 1611 comedy, The Tempest, endures through its Jacobean representation of how patriarchal hierarchies within the play are maintained through oppression and restored through the power of illusion. These enduring features are reimagined through displaying Margaret Atwood’s post-modern novel, Hag-seed (2016), where she simultaneously displays paralleling power structures, but instead examines the prevalence of gender roles and modern technology to evoke forgiveness in her Fourth- Wave feminist context. Thus, Atwood’s secular re-imagination resonates through the universal idea of forgiveness, with the dissonant values surrounding each text prompting new post-colonial and feminist interpretations to emerge. Through textual conversations established by Hag-seed, Shakespeare’s representation of the complex power relations between colonizer and colonized prompts contemporary responders to question the morality associated with such subjugation, contextually alluding to the expansionist agendas that characterized the Jacobean Era. Drawing upon the archetypal master-slave dynamic, Shakespeare establishes a microcosmic representation of the colonizer and colonized through “Malignant” Ariel’s repeated reference
    [Show full text]
  • DAVID INGRAM, WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE and the TEMPEST Robert Bromber University of California-Santa Barbara
    id1857310 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com THE LIAR AND THE BARD: DAVID INGRAM, WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE AND THE TEMPEST Robert Bromber University of California-Santa Barbara A few of the men that John Hawkins stranded in Mexico in 1568 wrote chronicles of their escape or captivity. By and large they penned unremarkable works most of which were featured in Richard Hakluyt’s Principals of Navigation. The chronicles are not literary masterpieces by any stretch of the imagination but offer a marvelous opportunity to visit the minds of ordinary Elizabethan seamen. Besides the inclusions in Hakluyt, two other sources offer up even more unique narratives. Neither story was in the first person: both were oral testimonies. William Collins spoke with officials of the Inquisition regarding the state of religion and other wide-ranging social issues under Elizabeth. Collin’s amazing testimony numbers two hundred and fifty pages. The second individual, David Ingram, left a legacy that lives today. Ingram is still the darling of American historians consumed by the notion of the noble savage. Ingram’s quasi travel narrative was delivered before a British Admiralty Commission in 1586 some twenty years after his escape from Mexico. His testimony included descriptions of an ordered society that was technologically and politically superior to that of England. This meaty information, however, is surrounded by beasts as mythical as those conjured up by John Mandeville. It presents those who use his words in support of a utopian Native American culture with a conundrum: was Ingram lying? By synthesizing the English narratives, whether written or testamentary, a marvelous picture of an Elizabethan lower-echelon subject appears.
    [Show full text]
  • Voice and Agency in William Shakespeare's the Tempest and Aimé Césaire's Une Tempête Sophie Fahey Scripps College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2017 Voice and Agency in William Shakespeare's The Tempest and Aimé Césaire's Une Tempête Sophie Fahey Scripps College Recommended Citation Fahey, Sophie, "Voice and Agency in William Shakespeare's The eT mpest and Aimé Césaire's Une Tempête" (2017). Scripps Senior Theses. 906. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/906 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOICE AND AGENCY IN SHAKESPEARE’S THE TEMPEST AND AIMÉ CÉSAIRE’S UNE TÉMPETE by SOPHIE R. FAHEY SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESSOR DECKER PROFESSOR SHELTON DECEMBER 16, 2016 I. Introduction In both William Shakespeare’s The Tempest and Aimé Césaire’s 1965 adaptation Une Tempête, a character’s power is directly linked to how much of a voice he or she has throughout the text. Both texts deal very explicitly with power, although Shakespeare focuses more on Prospero regaining his power through a position in European society, while Césaire is concerned with the effects of colonial figures (represented by Prospero) on the colonized (represented by Ariel and Caliban). Césaire explores in depth the character of Caliban who serves as the protagonist, instead of his antagonistic role in Shakespeare’s play. Césaire explicitly casts Caliban as a black slave and Ariel as a mulatto slave, bringing the ideas of colonialism to the forefront of the play.
    [Show full text]
  • Florio and the Sonnets – Part One
    FLORIO AND THE SONNETS – PART ONE Written by Giulia Harding Shakespeare’s Sonnets pose a problem for modern scholars. Most today agree that the poem bound with them, “A Lover’s Complaint” is not by Shakespeare at all. It has been specifically excluded from the latest edition of his complete works (edited by Jonathan Bate and Eric Rasmussen for the Royal Shakespeare Company), a decision which reflects current thinking and is a fairly definitive conclusion to many years of debate. The poem appears to be modelled on, but is considered inferior to, Samuel Daniel’s “The Complaint of Rosamund”. In its original publication however, we find these words on the title page: “A Lover’s complaint – BY – William Shake-speare” which raises a wider issue. If this statement is actually a bare-faced lie, surely it should be admitted that the whole volume is open to more sceptical scrutiny. Where there is one deceit, there may be others and it would be useful to discover why there was any need for a falsehood in the first place. In this article I aim to demonstrate a very new theory, that King James I’s wife, Queen Anne, was the true author of “A Lover’s Complaint” and that she charged her private secretary John Florio with the task of publishing it anonymously. He sought the help of his old friend William Shakespeare and current publishing partner Thomas Thorpe to generate a smoke-screen that he hoped would be dense enough to disguise her identity and fulfil her wish without causing a scandal.
    [Show full text]