DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of Representation and Proposed Modifications to the IBP 2020 – 2025 APPENDIX 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary of Representation and Proposed Modifications to the IBP 2020 – 2025 APPENDIX 1 Summary of representation and proposed Modifications to the IBP 2020 – 2025 APPENDIX 1 Authority/or Representations Recomme ganisation nded changes following consultatio n WSCC PROW Indicative project delivery could be: IBP/787 Pagham to South Mundham Route – as this scheme is reliant on reserved matters and occupations as well as permission IBP/787, being granted and built out on other sites that contribute to this scheme, a realistic indicative delivery could be 22/23 and 23/24 IBP/789, (we will adjust this if required – forward or back). IBP/580, &/IBP/352 IBP/789 Thornham Lane to Cot Lane – This could be relatively soon. Considering the IBP is setting priorities for the coming 5 will be years, the next financial year we can add this project to would therefore be 20/21 and 21/22, obviously depending on a viable updated scheme and full funding. as requested. TELECOMMUNICATIONS IBP/580 Project has now completed across the County and should be removed from the list as part of this update to the IBP. The County Council supports the projects selected for CIL funding in table 11 of the IDP with some amendments indicated below. HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORT The following improvements from the emerging Local Plan transport strategy are not included in the IBP document, it is for CDC to determine how these should be updated considering how this links to the work on the Local Plan Review. Chichester City Junctions 5 and 6 are individual improvements within the Northgate Gyratory at Northgate/Orchard St and Churchside/Broyle New Road respectively and although not individually listed in the IBP may be considered to be subsumed within the larger projects Northgate Gyratory scheme included at IBP/352. Contributions against J5 and 6 from the study may be placed towards IBP/352. IBP/837, IBP/838,IB Junction 7 A286 New Park Road / A286 St Pancras Road Project cost estimate £387,400 + 61% Optimism Bias (IBP/837) P/839 are associated Junction 9 Stockbridge Road / Terminus Road Range of options Costs up to approx. £300K + 61% Optimism Bias (IBP/838) with the Local Plan Chichester Wider Area Review Junction 2 B2145/B2201 (Sidlesham Common) Project costs £372,500 + 61% Optimism Bias (IBP/839) and will be Cost estimates exclude: included Options and Development Phase Costs within the Land costs Local Plan Statutory Undertakers Costs Review Employers Agent Supervision Costs IDP rather Non-Recoverable VAT Allowances than this Inflation beyond Q3 2018 IBP. Portfolio Risks Portfolio Risks IBP/840 and Land Contamination and Remediation costs IBP/841 will be The A27 schemes included in the IBP do have the updated costs from the PBA study. The study update and highway feasibly included in work may change these costs in the spring. the IBP IBP/344 – project completed so remove from IBP. IBP/344 will be IBP/346, 670 359, 658, 356, 357– reference projects as medium term not short term recorded as IBP/349 – Feasibility work is currently being undertaken to consider the A286 Birdham Road/B2201 (Selsey Tram Roundabout) completed junction. It is considered that costs will increase and, an estimated cost range for the scheme is between £400k - £600k. The request for CIL funding will increase, taking account of the increased received and allocated S106 funding available (c£160k). IBP/346, IBP/670, IBP - 350/679/680/681/682 IBP/359, Reg 123 lists limited collection of any funds through S106 for these projects as listed under CIL. Part of the sustainable transport IBP/658, strategy for the District to mitigate the planned development in the Local Plan. CDC to determine how best for these projects to be IBP/356, funded and come forward to mitigate development in the adopted Local Plan following removal of Reg123 lists. IBP/357, IBP/349, IBP 353 – Westhampnett sustainable corridor, move back the £500,000 CIL allocation to 20/21. IBP/353, IBP/364 IBP 364 – We request that there is reference to the Barnham to Chichester cycle scheme be added into the IBP364 project will be description for clarity as would link to this scheme. Feasibility work is currently being undertaken on the wider route, but it amended considered that the Tangmere to Chichester section would link tothe Barnham section and so become one route from Barnham to as Chichester. The Barnham to Chichester cycle route is project 192 in the WSCC Cycling and Walking Strategy. suggested The Chichester to Barnham cycle route is in the initial stages, with a feasibility study currently being undertaken (A29 to A27) skirting the proposed development at Tangmere. The project consideration and funding allocation has been considered through IBP/350, the WSCC LTIP process. The s106 funds currently held in Tangmere (alongside some contributions from development in Arun) IBP/679, have been allocated to the cycle scheme in LTIP (from Barnham to Chichester), and will be approved formally once the scheme IBP/680, moves into the WSCC Annual Delivery Programme. IBP/681 & IBP/682 will be removed from the IBP as the BikeIt project is promotion rather than infrastruct ure. & therefore not suitable for stand alone projects. IBP/372 – Air Quality Action Plan measures. Should this project detail be updated to reference the CDC 2018 monitoring reports: IBP/372 CDC to replace some of its fleet vehicles with electric vehicles, raise awareness of facts around poor air quality and how to reduce no change pollution (focus on benefits of active travel and reduce exposure), enable air quality impact from new development considerations required at using new Local Plan policy, commence work on LCWIP, deliver a new air quality monitoring station in Chichester on this stage Westhampnett Road? IBP/540, 541, 542, 543 – reference as medium term IBP/540, IBP/541, IBP/659 – Manhood school access improvements, move back a year to 21/22. IBP/542, IBP 543, IBP/665, 655 and 654 IBP/659, The Road Space Audit is expected to be completed in two phases. Therefore,please change the projects to be 2 rather than 3 IBP/669 projects as currently in the IBP.The first phase would be expected to be completed in in 2020/21, the second phase the following will be year so 2021/22. The figures would remain the same so £500K for phase one and £250K for phase two. updated as IBP/669 – reference as medium to long term, delivery not expected before 2027. requested. IBP/787, 789– it is requested that these projects be prioritised for funding in table 11. IBP/654 will be New Project (IBP/840) - College Lane / Spitalfield Road Junction improvements. The project is looking to widen the existing deleted footways each side of the junction to make suitable for shared use and an improvement to the traffic island in this junction to again and make it suitable for shared use. Estimated delivery would be 21/22 with a cost estimate of £60k to be fully funded by CIL. This IBP/665 would link to schemes to improve the northern side of Oaklands Way and Oaklands Way roundabout. and IBP/655 New Project (IBP/841) - Chidham Sustainable Transport Improvements. The basis of the scheme is to widen existing footways to will be accommodate shared use and to potentially re-align the junctions of Broad Road and the A259 and Chidham Lane and the A259 updated to accommodate the shared path and make crossing of the A259 safer for walkers and cyclists. This project will help alleviate as heavy congestion outside the Primary School that exists and will inevitably get worse due to recent new development on Broad requested. Road and planned development at the northern end of Broad Road. Estimated scheme cost of 1.8m – 2.0m with estimated start IBP/787 & date of 22/23. There is £162k S106 funding received and allocated to scheme. Request for 500k of CIL funding based on new IBP/789 development in Chidham since CIL was implemented. will be considere Education d for IBP/328 – add in ‘(Considering the Neighbourhood Plan Vision for one school, Master Planning of the site is including land for funding at provision of a 3 form entry school)’ to the scheme details column. the appropriat IBP/593 – reference as short term. e time next May. IBP/330 – remove planning reference to SB/14/02800/OUT, this should be on IBP 331. In responses to IDPs and discussions with WSCC developers we reference only the upper cost estimates for projects. Therefore, we would prefer the cost range for projects to be need to removed, with only the upper cost in the document. identify the year in Library Provision which IBP/335 and 336 - Change cost range from £75,000 - £100,000 to £100,000, remove words ‘new’ and ‘school’ from the these descriptions so ‘library provision as part of a community centre for…..to include shelving and self-service terminal’ also reference projects to CIL in funding sources column for both library provision entries. are to be delivered. Waste Management. IBP/710 – remove ‘rebuilding’ in title for all references to IBP 710. Should read as ‘Reconfiguration/improvement of Westhampnett IBP/328, transfer station/household waste recycling site. We also request to add in additional wording to the IBP/593, justification column ‘Additional capacity required to handle materials from the kerbside collections i.e. separately collected food IBP/330, waste, small WEEE (Waste Electronic and Electrical Equipment), textiles’. IBP/331, IBP/335, Flood and Drainage IBP/336, There are a number of projects that have been discussed with CDC engineers, it will be for CDC to decide if projects should be IBP/710 revised, remain or be removed such as IBP/288, 289, 291, 14, 50, 595, 100, 135, 721, 178, 164, 290, 570, 287, 711, 396.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Engineering Main Proof of Evidence Jeremy Gardner APP/P3.1/ENG
    APP/P3.1/ENG Engineering Main Proof of Evidence Jeremy Gardner APP/P3.1/ENG 1 Introduction Qualifications and Experience 1.1 My name is Jeremy Donald Gardner. I am a Director with AECOM, a consultancy firm specialising in architecture, design, engineering, and construction services for public and private sector clients across a broad range of sectors. Our transportation practice provides the full range of specialist transportation services including civil, mechanical, electrical and traffic engineering required for the design of tramway and LRT systems. 1.2 I am a Chartered Engineer, being a member of the Institution of Civil Engineers since 1978. I have a BSc in Civil Engineering from the University of Birmingham. Since graduation in 1974, I have worked for AECOM and its legacy companies, Faber Maunsell Ltd and Maunsell Ltd. I am the director responsible for AECOM’s work on the Midlands Metro, Wolverhampton City Centre Extension ("WCCE"). 1.3 During my career I have worked on the planning, implementation and maintenance of a number tramway and LRT schemes. These include London (Croydon) Tramlink, Manchester Metrolink, Sheffield Supertram, West Midlands Metro and the Docklands Light Railway. Scope of Evidence 1.4 My evidence covers the engineering of the scheme and layout of the elements of the project. 1.5 In response to the Statement of Matters my evidence addresses: (#2) ‘The main alternative options considered by Centro and the reasons for choosing the proposals comprised in the scheme’. (#6) ‘The effects of the scheme on statutory undertakers and other utility providers, and their ability to carry out undertakings effectively, safely and in compliance with any statutory or contractual obligations'.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRI Rail Knowledge Bank Update. Access Bridge
    ACRI Rail Knowledge Bank Update. Brought to you by the Australian Road Research Board. Access February 2017 The benefits of improving access to the United Kingdom rail network via the Access for All programme Duckenfield, T “Access for All” is a United Kingdom government funded programme to make stations more accessible for people with disabilities by providing step free access along with complementary measures such as improved wayfinding information. Steer Davies Gleave was commissioned to evaluate the programme in a manner consistent with official guidance (“WebTAG”), and to quantify the benefits to rail passengers and train operators. This paper describes what data was collected, how it was collected, how it was analysed and what the results were. It also identifies some important lessons for improving the implementation of the programme, which may have wider applicability. View item Bridge December 2016 FHWA LTPP guidelines for measuring bridge approach transitions using inertial profilers Henderson, B; Dickes, J; Cimini, G; Olmedo, C This document presents guidelines to measure bridge approach transitions using inertial profilers. The guidelines were developed by the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) Program and the Office of Infrastructure Research and Development Bridge and Foundation Engineering Team. The bump at the end of the bridge has long been studied for highways and railways, yet experts from across the transportation industry continue to identify it as one of the most prevalent substructure factors affecting bridge performance. View item Design January 2017 Responding to the challenges of designing high passenger capacity metropolitan rail carriages Coxon, S; Napper, R Metropolitan railways around the world are experiencing a significant increase in patronage.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria Ministry of Transport, Information Technology and Communications
    Directive 2010/40/EU Progress Report 2017 Bulgaria_Ministry of Transport, Information Technology and Communications October 2017 1 Introduction 1.1 General overview of the national activities and projects The Ministry of Transport, Information Technology and Communications prepared the Progress Report on the base of information, provided by its internal structures, the Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Regional Development and Public works, the Road Infrastructure Agency, subordinated to the Ministry of Regional Development and Public works, and respective Municipalities. The information is reflected as it is sent to the Ministry of Transport, Information Technology and Communications. According to the Automobile Transport Act the Minister of Transport, Information Technology and Communications shall coordinate the activities for deployment and application of intelligent transport systems in the field of road transport and interfaces with other transport modes. For supporting the activity of the Minister of Transport, Information Technology and Communications an Intelligent Transport Systems Council was set up. The Chair of the Council is the Minister of Transport, Information Technology and Communications, and Deputy Chairs are the Deputy Minister of Transport, Information Technology and Communications, a Deputy Minister of Interior and a Deputy Minister of Regional Development and Public Works. 1.2 General progress since 2014 1 1.3 Contact information Stefan Popov Member of the EITSC Chief expert in the Ministry of Transport, Information
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Bohemia Mining District, Oregon
    NOTES ON THE BOHEMIA MINING DISTRICT, OREGON. By DONALD FRANCIS MACDONALD. INTRODUCTION. The Bohemia mining district is in Lane and Douglas counties, west-central Oregon. It lies on Calapooya Mountain, in the western foothills of the Cascade Range. The district is about 30 miles south­ east of Cottage Grove, a small town on the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Oregon and Southeastern Railroad runs from Cottage Grove to Disston, within 12 miles of the mines, which are reached by stage. In August, 1908, the writer made a short stay in this district and incidentally to otl}er work visited some of the larger mineral proper­ ties. For some of the data presented• herein he is indebted to Mr. J. S. Diller, of the United States Geological Survey, who made a reconnaissance of the region in 1898,a and for many courtesies to Messrs. L. D. Ryan, F. J. Hard, W. W. Warner, and other mining men of the district. PHYSIOGRAPHY AND GENERAL GEOLOGY. The relief of the district is pronounced. Several peaks are more than 6,000 feet high, and the elevation of the lowest valleys is less than 2,000 feet. This bold relief is the result of mountain glaciation and stream ero&ion. The luxuriant vegetation due to the humid climate has somewhat masked the geologic features of the region. Great forests clothe the mountain slopes and the region is notable for its timber value. The rocks of the district are andesitic lavas and tuft's of Tertiary age, which are cut by dacite porphyry and probably by basalt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Midland Metro (Wolverhampton City Centre Extension) Order 2016
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2016 No. 684 TRANSPORT AND WORKS, ENGLAND TRANSPORT, ENGLAND The Midland Metro (Wolverhampton City Centre Extension) Order 2016 Made - - - - 12th July 2016 Coming into force - - 2nd August 2016 CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1. Citation and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Incorporation of the Railways Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 4. Application of the Midland Metro Acts 5. Application of the 1991 Act PART 2 WORKS PROVISIONS Principal powers 6. Power to construct and maintain works 7. Power to deviate 8. Designation of works Streets 9. Power to alter layout, etc., of streets 10. Power to keep apparatus in streets 11. Power to execute street works 12. Temporary stopping up of streets 13. Access to works 14. Construction and maintenance of new, altered or diverted highways 15. Restoration of streets if tramway discontinued 16. Construction and alteration of bridges 17. Agreements with street authorities 18. Level crossings Supplemental powers 19. Attachment of equipment to buildings 20. Discharge of water 21. Works to safeguard buildings and the operation of the authorised tramway 22. Power to survey and investigate land, etc. 23. Mode of construction and operation of tramway 24. Obstruction of construction of authorised works 25. Power to construct temporary tramways 26. Temporary interference with the Birmingham Canal PART 3 ACQUISITION AND POSSESSION OF LAND Powers of acquisition 27. Power to acquire land 28. Application of Part 1 of the 1965 Act 29. Application of Compulsory Purchase (Vesting Declarations) Act 1981 30. Powers to acquire new rights 31. New rights only to be acquired in certain lands 32. Rights under or over streets Temporary possession of land 33.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods of Recognising Routes of Closed Tram Lines in the Centre of Będzin on the Basis of Field Researches in an Urban Space
    METHODS OF LANDSCAPE RESEARCH Dissertations Commission of Cultural Landscape No. 8 Commission of Cultural Landscape of Polish Geographical Society, Sosnowiec, 2008 Anna MAZUR 1, Marcin RECHŁOWICZ 2, Andrzej SOCZÓWKA 2 1Association of the Forum the Passenger Transport 2University of Silesia, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Sosnowiec, Poland e-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] METHODS OF RECOGNISING ROUTES OF CLOSED TRAM LINES IN THE CENTRE OF BĘDZIN ON THE BASIS OF FIELD RESEARCHES IN AN URBAN SPACE key words: historical landscape, tram lines, Poland, Będzin INTRODUCTION Research subject covers methodical aspect of a recognition, on the basis of landscape and urban space changes, of transformation of a tram network in the centre of Będzin. Researches aim at pointing and describing the most significant methods used in geo-historical researches on a urban rail transport. Thus a spatial aspect has been assumed as a leading issue. Time scope covers the years of a tram mode which was functioning in the city (years 1928-2008). Due to the fact the crucial transformations have been made in the city centre, the researches are focused on this area. METHODS OF GEO-HISTORICAL RESEARCHES ON A TRAM TRANSPORT In geo-historical tram transport analyses two groups of coupled methods are used. These are preliminary study researches on various, characterized below, source materials and which are theoretical basis for a complementary and verifying field researches. During a research process such a data is often verified more than once, not only in source materials (particularly when interpretation problems occur), but also in the field. Comprehensive literature studies however are carried out with a heuristic me- thod (with a focus on an issue using as many available information about it as possible) and they aim at obtaining a maximum amount of various information 127 about urban transport in the considered time and space scope.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Business Plan 2018/2023
    Chichester District Council Infrastructure Business Plan 2018/2023 March 2018 www.chichester.gov.uk/planningpolicy 1 Contents Page No. Foreword 3 1. Purpose of the Infrastructure Business Plan 4 2. Infrastructure Projects 5-17 3. CIL Implementation Plan 18-22 4. CIL Cash flow and Spending Plan 23-27 5. Conclusions 28 Appendices A. Full Infrastructure Project list City, Town & Parish Projects 30-68 Chichester District Council Projects 68-82 West Sussex County Council Projects 82-99 Infrastructure Commissioners Projects 100-106 B. CIL Applicable Housing Trajectories 107-114 C. Infrastructure Prioritisation Process, Monitoring & Governance 115-121 D. Funding Source Review 122-137 E. Project Pro-forma 138 F. Regulation 123 list 139-140 G. IBP Glossary 141 2 Foreword This Infrastructure Business Plan (IBP) covers the Chichester Local Plan area, it excludes parts of the district that fall within the South Downs National Park because the South Downs National Park Authority is responsible for this area. Local communities are frequently concerned that the provision of infrastructure (by which we mean roads, flood defences, schools, doctors’ surgeries, children’s playgrounds etc.) does not keep pace with the rate of new house building. One purpose of the IBP is to ensure that infrastructure is provided at the right time and in the right place so that this problem does not get worse in the future. Infrastructure can be paid for in several different ways, for example: Customer bills – to telephone and broadband companies and water companies to supply fresh water and to take away and treat wastewater. Government grants, to help provide school places (or other grant sources from Europe or the Local Economic Partnership).
    [Show full text]
  • Northampton Gateway Rail Freight Interchange (TR050006)
    Northampton Gateway Rail Freight Interchange (TR050006) Correspondence received after the close of the Examination at 23:59 on 9 April 2019 No. From Organisation Date Received 1. Paul Minton Northampton Rail Users Group 13 May 2019 2. Emily Bailey Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) Plc 07 June 2019 (“WPD”) 3. Mark Redding Stop Rail Central Limited 08 June 2019 4. Melissa Johnson Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail) 08 July 2019 From: To: [email protected] Subject: Howbury Park appeal decision, relevance to Northampton Gateway Date: 13 May 2019 10:23:21 Attachments: 19-05-07_DL_IR_Moat_Lane_Erith_3184205_6.pdf Dear Sir/ Madam Northampton Gateway Rail Freight Interchange (TR050006) Your reference: 20010406 At the latest meeting of NRUG (Saturday 11th May), the members requested that I brought the decision of the Howbury Park freight interchange appeal to the Examiners' attention. The decision to refuse on appeal is attached. A number of issues that equally apply for Northampton Gateway (and have been documented in NRUG's submissions) are addressed,including: - No need for 2 SFRIs within 21 miles of each other, noting that DIRFT lies only 18 miles from the location of the proposed Northampton Gateway facility. - London Gateway operates in its own right to serve London, and another facility to do the same is not required. - Interference with passenger traffic, even at 4 trains per day for the freight terminal, is sufficient to warrant refusal. Additionally NRUG would comment that Roxhill's assertion of "build it and the users will come" is not supported by their decision not to build out Howbury Park in the 10 year window they had consent.
    [Show full text]
  • Roseburn Corridor Area a Lead Objectors 28
    GROUP 33 – ROSEBURN CORRIDOR AREA A LEAD OBJECTORS 28 – ALISON BOURNE 132 – IAN HEWITT 210 – CHAG ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT – WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL PROMOTER’S COMMENTS ON THE WITNESS STATEMENT OF MRS ALISON J BOURNE, GROUP 33 LEAD OBJECTOR As this Witness Statement is quite long it is thought likely to be of convenience to both the Committee and to Group 33 for the promoter’s comments and rebuttal points to be made following each paragraph, where appropriate. This document is a companion to the other rebuttals that address the issues of principle the promoter considers have been raised by Group 33. Executive Summary 1 “I do not think that we have a specific view on whether a closed loop is good, bad or indifferent. The better way of looking at it is to make sure that the right route is chosen. Stewart Lingard mentioned earlier that French and German systems make sure that the right connections are made where there are centres or points of economic activity such as hospitals, schools, universities, colleges, shops and the business district. Those places are the centres of economic activity and that is where the patronage base is. The route itself is the key.” Quote from Keith Holden, NAO representative, to Tram Lines 1 and 2 Committees – September 2004. Promoter: We agree entirely with the quotation from Keith Holden. [A Oldfield] 2 The Western General Hospital (WGH) is often the first port of call in time of crisis for residents in the north and west of Edinburgh. It is anticipated that the north of Edinburgh will see a population increase of approximately 50,000 over the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • TROLLEY WIRE AUGUST 2008 TTRROOLLLLEEYY WWIIRREE AUSTRALIA’S TRAMWAY MUSEUM MAGAZINE AUGUST 2008 No
    102482 Nat Advertising 11/8/08 5:42 PM Page 1 TTRROOLLLLEEYY No. 314 WWIIRREE AUGUST 2008 Print Post Approved PP245358/00021 $9.90* In this issue • Purely for Pleasure - 2ft Gauge Trams • NSW Tramway Emergency Vehicle • The Naming of Melbourne’s ‘Port Junction’ 102482 Nat Advertising 12/8/08 9:12 AM Page 2 TROLLEY WIRE AUGUST 2008 TTRROOLLLLEEYY WWIIRREE AUSTRALIA’S TRAMWAY MUSEUM MAGAZINE AUGUST 2008 No. 314 Vol. 49 No. 3 - ISSN 0155-1264 CONTENTS PURELY FOR PLEASURE - A SAGA OF 2FT GAUGE TRAMS...........................................3 EMERGENCY VEHICLE FOR NSW TRAMWAY BREAKDOWNS ...............................................10 MORE TRAMS AND TRAM LINES FOR ADELAIDE........................................................................14 THE NAMING OF MELBOURNE’S ‘PORT JUNCTION’...16 HERE AND THERE...................................................................19 MUSEUM NEWS.......................................................................24 Published by the South Pacific Electric Railway Co-operative Society Limited, PO Box 103, Sutherland, NSW 1499 Phone: (02) 9542 3646 Fax: (02) 9545 3390 Editor......................................................Bob Merchant Sub-editing and Production..........................Dale Budd Geoff Spaulding trial fits a body rib on Sydney D class Randall Wilson car 117 in the Sydney Tramway Museum’s workshop Ross Willson on 25 July 2008. Bob Merchant *Cover price $9.90 (incl. GST) Subscription Rates (for four issues per year) to expire in December. Australia .........................................................$A36.00
    [Show full text]
  • Chichester District Council Infrastructure Business Plan 2020
    Chichester District Council Infrastructure Business Plan 2020/2025 January 2020 www.chichester.gov.uk/planningpolicy 1 Contents Page No. Foreword 3 Purpose of the Infrastructure Business Plan 4 Infrastructure Projects 5-18 CIL Implementation Plan 19-24 CIL Cash flow and Spending Plan 25-31 Conclusions 32 Appendices Full Infrastructure Project list City, Town & Parish Projects 34-66 Chichester District Council Projects 66-79 West Sussex County Council Projects 79-95 Infrastructure Commissioners Projects 95-103 CIL Applicable Housing Trajectories 104-108 Infrastructure Prioritisation Process, Monitoring & Governance 109-115 Funding Source Review 116-131 Project Pro-forma 132 IBP Glossary 133 2 Foreword This Infrastructure Business Plan (IBP) covers the Chichester Local Plan area, it excludes parts of the district that fall within the South Downs National Park because the South Downs National Park Authority is responsible for this area. Local communities are frequently concerned that the provision of infrastructure (by which we mean roads, flood defences, schools, doctors’ surgeries, children’s playgrounds etc.) does not keep pace with the rate of new house building. One purpose of the IBP is to ensure that infrastructure is provided at the right time and in the right place so that this problem does not get worse in the future. Infrastructure can be paid for in several different ways, for example: Customer bills – to telephone and broadband companies and water companies to supply fresh water and to take away and treat wastewater. Government grants, to help provide school places (or other grant sources for example the Local Economic Partnership). Planning obligations – S106 (infrastructure that provides site specific mitigation).
    [Show full text]
  • 24Th MODEL RAILWAY EXHIBITION
    2001 24th MODEL RAILWAY EXHIBITION SOUVENIR PROGRAMME Opening Hours:- R Rickatrack Mon, Tues, Thurs, Fri, Sat 9am – 4:55pm M Model Railways Closed all day Wed & Sun R (S & D Noyce, established 1936) www.rickatrack.co.uk NEW AND SECONDHAND PART EXCHANGE COMPETITIVE PRICES LARGE STOCKS OF:- LIMA RATIO HORNBY SPRINGSIDE BACHMANN WILLS DAPOL LANGLEY ACCESSORIES REPLICA SUPERQUICK GRAHAM FARISH PC TRANSFERS PECO RAILMATCH PAINTS PLUS MUCH MORE CHECK OUT OUR WEBSITE FOR Latest releases Local events Catalogue download Special offers Sale items Secondhand Site updated at least once a month WATCH THE WINDOW FOR MONTHLY SPECIAL OFFERS Rickatrack Model Railways 347/9 Victoria Avenue, Southend-on-Sea, Essex. SS2 6NH Telephone: 01702 346079 Email: [email protected] 2 THE MID ESSEX MODEL RAILWAY CLUB Welcome to our 24th model railway interested in railway modelling and would like exhibition, the seventh here at Shenfield High to find out more about the Mid Essex Model School. We have organised a show of similar Railway Club and its activities then please size to last year’s with twenty-one layouts in contact one of the stewards or write to the gauges “N” to “O”. Again we have tried to Secretary whose address appears below. keep up the standard and hope that the selec- Finally, we hope you will have a pleasant tion will cater for all interests from the junior day and thank you for supporting this event. modellers to finescale scratch-builders. Should you have difficulties there are Other attractions for your enjoyment first aiders attending the exhibition. Dressed today are rides on the live steam railway and a in green uniforms, their first aid room is bus trip to Shenfield Station.
    [Show full text]