DOCSLIB.ORG

Consideration of Consultation Responses Received On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consideration of Consultation Responses Received On Summary of representations and proposed Modifications to the IBP 2021 – 2026 APPENDIX 1 Authorit Representations Recommended y/organi changes sation following consultation WSCC HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORT IBP349 - A286 Birdham Road / B2201 (Selsey Tram Roundabout) junction improvement - Technical work on this scheme is currently on hold. Until further work on IBP/349 will be the Local Plan review has completed, we are unlikely to be able to confirm the mitigation project and the timeframe for delivery. marked as on hold pending Moving of funding unsure at this stage – unable to advise, CDC may wish to decide an indicative or how to represent this in the IBP as linked to the Local Plan and work on the how this project may or may not go ahead as currently been considered so far. the Local Plan Review, and therefore CDC proposes to move the project from 2020/21 to 2022/23 IBP353 - Westhampnett Road/ St Pancras/ Spitalfield Lane/ St James Road double mini roundabouts junction improvement. To include improvements to sustainable IBP/353 will be transport facilities along Westhampnett Road. CCTS – to reduce traffic congestion & improve safety. – technical work is continuing on this scheme with a low cost and moved from high cost option. Westhampnett Road is ongoing with further feasibility work this financial year. Would not expect the delivery of this scheme probably until 2023/24 at 2020/21 to the earliest, and this is dependent on pinch point funding which has been suspended. Move current 500k funding for project to 2022/23. 2022/23 IBP656 - Sustainable Transport Corridor - City Centre to Portfield and improvements to sustainable transport facilities on Oving Road corridor. To increase sustainable The update transport mode share. Considering improvements to road space allocation. – Following agreement at the South Chichester CLC meeting on 26th October, this scheme regarding IBP/ should proceed to the next stage of development following the completion of the feasibility study. It is expected for this project to be subject to consideration for further 656 is noted. design in 2021/22. Appendix A: IBP354 - Bus lane along A259 approaching Bognor Road Roundabout Chichester City Transport Strategy – to reduce short car trips to and from the city centre - IBP/354 Once Following agreement at the South Chichester CLC meeting on 26th October, this scheme should proceed to the next stage of development following the completion of WSCC know the feasibility study. It is expected for this project to be subject to consideration for further design in 2021/22. The project has an updated feasibility stage cost estimate what year the that is subject to change, of £2.28m. It is intended for this project to come forward within the 5 years, depending on external funding opportunities. It is therefore project will be suggested that this is added to table 11 as a prioritised scheme for CIL funding within this IBP 5-year period. ready by the project can be considered for inclusion in the 2022 version of the 5 year spending plan. The cost of the project will be amended from £1.2m to £2.28m IBP 841 - Chidham Sustainable Transport Improvements. A259 to provide shared pedestrian/cycle path. To alleviate congestion outside Primary School due to recent IBP/841 housing developments. – please amend the wording on table 11 to remove the words and add in words below:- wording will be Chidham Sustainable Transport Improvements to widen existing footways to accommodate shared use & to potentially re-align the junctions of Broad Road and the amended as A259 and Chidham Lane and the A259 to accommodate the shared path and make crossing of the A259 safer for walkers and cyclists. This project will help Also to requested in alleviate heavy congestion outside the Primary School (subject to further detail and evaluation). bold. IBP 355 – Real Time Passenger Information screens at Chichester City. Phase 1 of this project is complete, awaiting final invoice from the contractor. WSCC will then The update invoice CDC within this financial year for last part of CIL funding. The next phase is being prepared and the paper for funding next year’s project will be sent to CDC in regarding the coming weeks. Leave 2021/22 funding as is. IBP/355 is noted. IBP 655 – Phase 1 Chichester Road Space Audit. To better manage demand for parking & network management aspirations. The cost has reduced from £500,000 to IBP/655 will be £100,000 reduced from £500,000 to £100,000. WASTE & RECYCLING IBP 710 - Reconfiguration/improvement of Westhampnett Waste Transfer Station/Household Waste Recycling Site. There has been some progress on this project. IBP/710 – Work is soon to start to assess options for the reconfiguration of the site to increase capacity. This project is to be funded by ADC and CDC. This initial feasibility work phase 1 will be will be funded by existing S106 collected in Arun. Therefore, we request the CIL funding from CDC is moved back one year so 250k 2021/22 and 2.25m 2022/23. moved from 2020/21 to 2021/22 & phase 2 will be moved from 2021/22 to 2022/23. EDUCATION IBP 330 - Expansion of existing primary school(s) across the Chichester locality and IBP 657 - School access improvements at expanded primary school(s) IBP/330 & Chichester – these linked schemes to be moved back to 2024/25. Current pupil trends indicate that this mitigation is not yet required. related 657 will be moved from year 2021 - 2022 to year 2024/25 as requested. IBP 332 - Primary School places Manhood Peninsula and IBP 659 - School access improvements at expanded primary school(s) Manhood – these linked schemes IBP/332 & to be moved back to 2024/25. Current pupil trends indicate that this mitigation is not yet required. related 659 will be moved back from year 2021 - 2022 to 2024/25 as requested. Chiches Update to IBP/287 The scheme to protect Selsey is estimated to cost £20m. IBP/287 will be ter FDGiA is expected to cover all development costs, and a significant portion of the construction costs. It is expected to be “shovel” ready by 2026, which is when the CIL updated to District will be required to help deliver the infrastructure.The remaining £5m requested of CIL relates to new development as identified in the Local Plan reflect the Council Chiche IBP/ Green Flood Coast Policy 10 202 Sho £520 FDGIA CDC CIL 3 Consider Selse increase in ster 287 Infrastruc and Protectio of Draft 0 – rt m (est. Poli selecting if y overall cost from £5m to District ture coastal n - Local Plan 202 term £15m), cy match £20m. The Council erosion Selsey “Mitigating 5 (202 contribu Hig funding is project will be risk East and 1- tions h identified updated as manage Beach – adapting 202 will be as this ready to be ment Raising to climate 6) required project delivered of the change” (est. supports 2026/27. Sea Wall £5m) the growth of the area provided it is for genuine communit y use. Please make the following changes and add new projects Infrastructure Scheme Justification/ Phasing Total estimated Sources of Delivery lead Category (from above (description) rationale (when) infrastructure cost funding, (who/how) list) showing amounts from each source & any shortfalls Transport IBP/845 Cycle route linking 2024 - 2029 £1.08 – 2.33 2.0 M CIL/grant funding CDC/WSCC/ LCWIP route A North Chichester via DfT Links to Northgate Lavant Road to proposals Northgate gyratory – IBP/352 at links new and southern end existing residential areas to City centre, IBP/845, 846, also links to 847, 848, 849, Centurion Way 850, 851, 852 providing route to & 853 will have Lavant/SDNP the costs Transport IBP/846 Cycle route via The 2024 - 2029 £0.13 – 1.40 0.87 M CIL/grant funding CDC/WSCC/ updated as LCWIP route B Broadway, DfT University requested in Summersdale Rd and bold. College Lane linking Links to crossing to Spitalfield Way – of College Lane links residential areas IBP/387 and in NE to City centre IBP/840 via University to City Transport IBP/847 Cycle route providing 2024 - 2029 £0.86 – 0.96 1.32 M CIL/grant funding CDC/ LCWIP route E link from SE (N DfT WSCC Mundham) to employment area in SE (Quarry Lane) and onwards to City centre Transport IBP/848 Cycle route from N 2024 - 2029 £0.52 M £0.51M CIL/grant funding CDC/WSCC LCWIP route F Mundham via DfT Links to IBP/544 bridleway to Chichester Free school and onwards to Whyke estate in S Chichester links to route E Transport IBP/849 Cycle route 2021 - 2024 £0.40 M £0.24 M CIL/grant funding CDC/WSCC LCWIP route G north improvements to DfT canal towpath Links to IBP/678 between SE part of and IBP/650 Donnington and Chichester canal basin including link to route H Transport IBP/850 Cycle route linking 2021 - 2024 £0.79 – 2.34 1.89 M CIL/grant funding CDC/WSCC LCWIP route H canal towpath to DfT central Donnington Links to IBP/349 and further link and IBP/206 northwards to access IBP/351 Chichester City via IBP/357 Southern A27 bridge Gateway project Transport IBP/851 Cycle route linking 2021-2024 £0.69 M 0.7 M CIL/grant funding CDC/WSCC LCWIP route N Barnfield Drive retail DfT park (and new Links to IBP/341 residential areas NE IBP/343 of City) to New Park IBP353 Road/St Pancras in City centre Transport IBP/852 Cycle route 2021-2024 £0.29 M 0.15 M CIL/grant funding CDC/WSCC LCWIP route Q improvements to DfT Links to Southern route between station Gateway project and Westgate via at southern end Chichester College Fields Transport LCWIP route K Cycle route linking 2021-2024 £0.79M CIL/grant funding CDC/WSCC links bridge over railway DfT to NCN2 through New IBP/910 via Westgate to west of city Orchard St Links to roundabout Whitehouse Farm development proposals New projects Transport IBP/853 Inner ring road cycle 2021-2024 £2.5 – 6.3 M 4.85 M Links to IBP/372 IBP/910 Core area cycle improvements listed AQAP measures IBP/911 improvements listed in LCWIP promoted by IBP/912 will be in LCWIP CDC/WSCC added as Links to requested.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Engineering Main Proof of Evidence Jeremy Gardner APP/P3.1/ENG
    APP/P3.1/ENG Engineering Main Proof of Evidence Jeremy Gardner APP/P3.1/ENG 1 Introduction Qualifications and Experience 1.1 My name is Jeremy Donald Gardner. I am a Director with AECOM, a consultancy firm specialising in architecture, design, engineering, and construction services for public and private sector clients across a broad range of sectors. Our transportation practice provides the full range of specialist transportation services including civil, mechanical, electrical and traffic engineering required for the design of tramway and LRT systems. 1.2 I am a Chartered Engineer, being a member of the Institution of Civil Engineers since 1978. I have a BSc in Civil Engineering from the University of Birmingham. Since graduation in 1974, I have worked for AECOM and its legacy companies, Faber Maunsell Ltd and Maunsell Ltd. I am the director responsible for AECOM’s work on the Midlands Metro, Wolverhampton City Centre Extension ("WCCE"). 1.3 During my career I have worked on the planning, implementation and maintenance of a number tramway and LRT schemes. These include London (Croydon) Tramlink, Manchester Metrolink, Sheffield Supertram, West Midlands Metro and the Docklands Light Railway. Scope of Evidence 1.4 My evidence covers the engineering of the scheme and layout of the elements of the project. 1.5 In response to the Statement of Matters my evidence addresses: (#2) ‘The main alternative options considered by Centro and the reasons for choosing the proposals comprised in the scheme’. (#6) ‘The effects of the scheme on statutory undertakers and other utility providers, and their ability to carry out undertakings effectively, safely and in compliance with any statutory or contractual obligations'.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRI Rail Knowledge Bank Update. Access Bridge
    ACRI Rail Knowledge Bank Update. Brought to you by the Australian Road Research Board. Access February 2017 The benefits of improving access to the United Kingdom rail network via the Access for All programme Duckenfield, T “Access for All” is a United Kingdom government funded programme to make stations more accessible for people with disabilities by providing step free access along with complementary measures such as improved wayfinding information. Steer Davies Gleave was commissioned to evaluate the programme in a manner consistent with official guidance (“WebTAG”), and to quantify the benefits to rail passengers and train operators. This paper describes what data was collected, how it was collected, how it was analysed and what the results were. It also identifies some important lessons for improving the implementation of the programme, which may have wider applicability. View item Bridge December 2016 FHWA LTPP guidelines for measuring bridge approach transitions using inertial profilers Henderson, B; Dickes, J; Cimini, G; Olmedo, C This document presents guidelines to measure bridge approach transitions using inertial profilers. The guidelines were developed by the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) Program and the Office of Infrastructure Research and Development Bridge and Foundation Engineering Team. The bump at the end of the bridge has long been studied for highways and railways, yet experts from across the transportation industry continue to identify it as one of the most prevalent substructure factors affecting bridge performance. View item Design January 2017 Responding to the challenges of designing high passenger capacity metropolitan rail carriages Coxon, S; Napper, R Metropolitan railways around the world are experiencing a significant increase in patronage.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria Ministry of Transport, Information Technology and Communications
    Directive 2010/40/EU Progress Report 2017 Bulgaria_Ministry of Transport, Information Technology and Communications October 2017 1 Introduction 1.1 General overview of the national activities and projects The Ministry of Transport, Information Technology and Communications prepared the Progress Report on the base of information, provided by its internal structures, the Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Regional Development and Public works, the Road Infrastructure Agency, subordinated to the Ministry of Regional Development and Public works, and respective Municipalities. The information is reflected as it is sent to the Ministry of Transport, Information Technology and Communications. According to the Automobile Transport Act the Minister of Transport, Information Technology and Communications shall coordinate the activities for deployment and application of intelligent transport systems in the field of road transport and interfaces with other transport modes. For supporting the activity of the Minister of Transport, Information Technology and Communications an Intelligent Transport Systems Council was set up. The Chair of the Council is the Minister of Transport, Information Technology and Communications, and Deputy Chairs are the Deputy Minister of Transport, Information Technology and Communications, a Deputy Minister of Interior and a Deputy Minister of Regional Development and Public Works. 1.2 General progress since 2014 1 1.3 Contact information Stefan Popov Member of the EITSC Chief expert in the Ministry of Transport, Information
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Bohemia Mining District, Oregon
    NOTES ON THE BOHEMIA MINING DISTRICT, OREGON. By DONALD FRANCIS MACDONALD. INTRODUCTION. The Bohemia mining district is in Lane and Douglas counties, west-central Oregon. It lies on Calapooya Mountain, in the western foothills of the Cascade Range. The district is about 30 miles south­ east of Cottage Grove, a small town on the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Oregon and Southeastern Railroad runs from Cottage Grove to Disston, within 12 miles of the mines, which are reached by stage. In August, 1908, the writer made a short stay in this district and incidentally to otl}er work visited some of the larger mineral proper­ ties. For some of the data presented• herein he is indebted to Mr. J. S. Diller, of the United States Geological Survey, who made a reconnaissance of the region in 1898,a and for many courtesies to Messrs. L. D. Ryan, F. J. Hard, W. W. Warner, and other mining men of the district. PHYSIOGRAPHY AND GENERAL GEOLOGY. The relief of the district is pronounced. Several peaks are more than 6,000 feet high, and the elevation of the lowest valleys is less than 2,000 feet. This bold relief is the result of mountain glaciation and stream ero&ion. The luxuriant vegetation due to the humid climate has somewhat masked the geologic features of the region. Great forests clothe the mountain slopes and the region is notable for its timber value. The rocks of the district are andesitic lavas and tuft's of Tertiary age, which are cut by dacite porphyry and probably by basalt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Midland Metro (Wolverhampton City Centre Extension) Order 2016
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2016 No. 684 TRANSPORT AND WORKS, ENGLAND TRANSPORT, ENGLAND The Midland Metro (Wolverhampton City Centre Extension) Order 2016 Made - - - - 12th July 2016 Coming into force - - 2nd August 2016 CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1. Citation and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Incorporation of the Railways Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 4. Application of the Midland Metro Acts 5. Application of the 1991 Act PART 2 WORKS PROVISIONS Principal powers 6. Power to construct and maintain works 7. Power to deviate 8. Designation of works Streets 9. Power to alter layout, etc., of streets 10. Power to keep apparatus in streets 11. Power to execute street works 12. Temporary stopping up of streets 13. Access to works 14. Construction and maintenance of new, altered or diverted highways 15. Restoration of streets if tramway discontinued 16. Construction and alteration of bridges 17. Agreements with street authorities 18. Level crossings Supplemental powers 19. Attachment of equipment to buildings 20. Discharge of water 21. Works to safeguard buildings and the operation of the authorised tramway 22. Power to survey and investigate land, etc. 23. Mode of construction and operation of tramway 24. Obstruction of construction of authorised works 25. Power to construct temporary tramways 26. Temporary interference with the Birmingham Canal PART 3 ACQUISITION AND POSSESSION OF LAND Powers of acquisition 27. Power to acquire land 28. Application of Part 1 of the 1965 Act 29. Application of Compulsory Purchase (Vesting Declarations) Act 1981 30. Powers to acquire new rights 31. New rights only to be acquired in certain lands 32. Rights under or over streets Temporary possession of land 33.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods of Recognising Routes of Closed Tram Lines in the Centre of Będzin on the Basis of Field Researches in an Urban Space
    METHODS OF LANDSCAPE RESEARCH Dissertations Commission of Cultural Landscape No. 8 Commission of Cultural Landscape of Polish Geographical Society, Sosnowiec, 2008 Anna MAZUR 1, Marcin RECHŁOWICZ 2, Andrzej SOCZÓWKA 2 1Association of the Forum the Passenger Transport 2University of Silesia, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Sosnowiec, Poland e-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] METHODS OF RECOGNISING ROUTES OF CLOSED TRAM LINES IN THE CENTRE OF BĘDZIN ON THE BASIS OF FIELD RESEARCHES IN AN URBAN SPACE key words: historical landscape, tram lines, Poland, Będzin INTRODUCTION Research subject covers methodical aspect of a recognition, on the basis of landscape and urban space changes, of transformation of a tram network in the centre of Będzin. Researches aim at pointing and describing the most significant methods used in geo-historical researches on a urban rail transport. Thus a spatial aspect has been assumed as a leading issue. Time scope covers the years of a tram mode which was functioning in the city (years 1928-2008). Due to the fact the crucial transformations have been made in the city centre, the researches are focused on this area. METHODS OF GEO-HISTORICAL RESEARCHES ON A TRAM TRANSPORT In geo-historical tram transport analyses two groups of coupled methods are used. These are preliminary study researches on various, characterized below, source materials and which are theoretical basis for a complementary and verifying field researches. During a research process such a data is often verified more than once, not only in source materials (particularly when interpretation problems occur), but also in the field. Comprehensive literature studies however are carried out with a heuristic me- thod (with a focus on an issue using as many available information about it as possible) and they aim at obtaining a maximum amount of various information 127 about urban transport in the considered time and space scope.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Business Plan 2018/2023
    Chichester District Council Infrastructure Business Plan 2018/2023 March 2018 www.chichester.gov.uk/planningpolicy 1 Contents Page No. Foreword 3 1. Purpose of the Infrastructure Business Plan 4 2. Infrastructure Projects 5-17 3. CIL Implementation Plan 18-22 4. CIL Cash flow and Spending Plan 23-27 5. Conclusions 28 Appendices A. Full Infrastructure Project list City, Town & Parish Projects 30-68 Chichester District Council Projects 68-82 West Sussex County Council Projects 82-99 Infrastructure Commissioners Projects 100-106 B. CIL Applicable Housing Trajectories 107-114 C. Infrastructure Prioritisation Process, Monitoring & Governance 115-121 D. Funding Source Review 122-137 E. Project Pro-forma 138 F. Regulation 123 list 139-140 G. IBP Glossary 141 2 Foreword This Infrastructure Business Plan (IBP) covers the Chichester Local Plan area, it excludes parts of the district that fall within the South Downs National Park because the South Downs National Park Authority is responsible for this area. Local communities are frequently concerned that the provision of infrastructure (by which we mean roads, flood defences, schools, doctors’ surgeries, children’s playgrounds etc.) does not keep pace with the rate of new house building. One purpose of the IBP is to ensure that infrastructure is provided at the right time and in the right place so that this problem does not get worse in the future. Infrastructure can be paid for in several different ways, for example: Customer bills – to telephone and broadband companies and water companies to supply fresh water and to take away and treat wastewater. Government grants, to help provide school places (or other grant sources from Europe or the Local Economic Partnership).
    [Show full text]
  • Northampton Gateway Rail Freight Interchange (TR050006)
    Northampton Gateway Rail Freight Interchange (TR050006) Correspondence received after the close of the Examination at 23:59 on 9 April 2019 No. From Organisation Date Received 1. Paul Minton Northampton Rail Users Group 13 May 2019 2. Emily Bailey Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) Plc 07 June 2019 (“WPD”) 3. Mark Redding Stop Rail Central Limited 08 June 2019 4. Melissa Johnson Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail) 08 July 2019 From: To: [email protected] Subject: Howbury Park appeal decision, relevance to Northampton Gateway Date: 13 May 2019 10:23:21 Attachments: 19-05-07_DL_IR_Moat_Lane_Erith_3184205_6.pdf Dear Sir/ Madam Northampton Gateway Rail Freight Interchange (TR050006) Your reference: 20010406 At the latest meeting of NRUG (Saturday 11th May), the members requested that I brought the decision of the Howbury Park freight interchange appeal to the Examiners' attention. The decision to refuse on appeal is attached. A number of issues that equally apply for Northampton Gateway (and have been documented in NRUG's submissions) are addressed,including: - No need for 2 SFRIs within 21 miles of each other, noting that DIRFT lies only 18 miles from the location of the proposed Northampton Gateway facility. - London Gateway operates in its own right to serve London, and another facility to do the same is not required. - Interference with passenger traffic, even at 4 trains per day for the freight terminal, is sufficient to warrant refusal. Additionally NRUG would comment that Roxhill's assertion of "build it and the users will come" is not supported by their decision not to build out Howbury Park in the 10 year window they had consent.
    [Show full text]
  • Roseburn Corridor Area a Lead Objectors 28
    GROUP 33 – ROSEBURN CORRIDOR AREA A LEAD OBJECTORS 28 – ALISON BOURNE 132 – IAN HEWITT 210 – CHAG ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT – WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL PROMOTER’S COMMENTS ON THE WITNESS STATEMENT OF MRS ALISON J BOURNE, GROUP 33 LEAD OBJECTOR As this Witness Statement is quite long it is thought likely to be of convenience to both the Committee and to Group 33 for the promoter’s comments and rebuttal points to be made following each paragraph, where appropriate. This document is a companion to the other rebuttals that address the issues of principle the promoter considers have been raised by Group 33. Executive Summary 1 “I do not think that we have a specific view on whether a closed loop is good, bad or indifferent. The better way of looking at it is to make sure that the right route is chosen. Stewart Lingard mentioned earlier that French and German systems make sure that the right connections are made where there are centres or points of economic activity such as hospitals, schools, universities, colleges, shops and the business district. Those places are the centres of economic activity and that is where the patronage base is. The route itself is the key.” Quote from Keith Holden, NAO representative, to Tram Lines 1 and 2 Committees – September 2004. Promoter: We agree entirely with the quotation from Keith Holden. [A Oldfield] 2 The Western General Hospital (WGH) is often the first port of call in time of crisis for residents in the north and west of Edinburgh. It is anticipated that the north of Edinburgh will see a population increase of approximately 50,000 over the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • TROLLEY WIRE AUGUST 2008 TTRROOLLLLEEYY WWIIRREE AUSTRALIA’S TRAMWAY MUSEUM MAGAZINE AUGUST 2008 No
    102482 Nat Advertising 11/8/08 5:42 PM Page 1 TTRROOLLLLEEYY No. 314 WWIIRREE AUGUST 2008 Print Post Approved PP245358/00021 $9.90* In this issue • Purely for Pleasure - 2ft Gauge Trams • NSW Tramway Emergency Vehicle • The Naming of Melbourne’s ‘Port Junction’ 102482 Nat Advertising 12/8/08 9:12 AM Page 2 TROLLEY WIRE AUGUST 2008 TTRROOLLLLEEYY WWIIRREE AUSTRALIA’S TRAMWAY MUSEUM MAGAZINE AUGUST 2008 No. 314 Vol. 49 No. 3 - ISSN 0155-1264 CONTENTS PURELY FOR PLEASURE - A SAGA OF 2FT GAUGE TRAMS...........................................3 EMERGENCY VEHICLE FOR NSW TRAMWAY BREAKDOWNS ...............................................10 MORE TRAMS AND TRAM LINES FOR ADELAIDE........................................................................14 THE NAMING OF MELBOURNE’S ‘PORT JUNCTION’...16 HERE AND THERE...................................................................19 MUSEUM NEWS.......................................................................24 Published by the South Pacific Electric Railway Co-operative Society Limited, PO Box 103, Sutherland, NSW 1499 Phone: (02) 9542 3646 Fax: (02) 9545 3390 Editor......................................................Bob Merchant Sub-editing and Production..........................Dale Budd Geoff Spaulding trial fits a body rib on Sydney D class Randall Wilson car 117 in the Sydney Tramway Museum’s workshop Ross Willson on 25 July 2008. Bob Merchant *Cover price $9.90 (incl. GST) Subscription Rates (for four issues per year) to expire in December. Australia .........................................................$A36.00
    [Show full text]
  • Chichester District Council Infrastructure Business Plan 2020
    Chichester District Council Infrastructure Business Plan 2020/2025 January 2020 www.chichester.gov.uk/planningpolicy 1 Contents Page No. Foreword 3 Purpose of the Infrastructure Business Plan 4 Infrastructure Projects 5-18 CIL Implementation Plan 19-24 CIL Cash flow and Spending Plan 25-31 Conclusions 32 Appendices Full Infrastructure Project list City, Town & Parish Projects 34-66 Chichester District Council Projects 66-79 West Sussex County Council Projects 79-95 Infrastructure Commissioners Projects 95-103 CIL Applicable Housing Trajectories 104-108 Infrastructure Prioritisation Process, Monitoring & Governance 109-115 Funding Source Review 116-131 Project Pro-forma 132 IBP Glossary 133 2 Foreword This Infrastructure Business Plan (IBP) covers the Chichester Local Plan area, it excludes parts of the district that fall within the South Downs National Park because the South Downs National Park Authority is responsible for this area. Local communities are frequently concerned that the provision of infrastructure (by which we mean roads, flood defences, schools, doctors’ surgeries, children’s playgrounds etc.) does not keep pace with the rate of new house building. One purpose of the IBP is to ensure that infrastructure is provided at the right time and in the right place so that this problem does not get worse in the future. Infrastructure can be paid for in several different ways, for example: Customer bills – to telephone and broadband companies and water companies to supply fresh water and to take away and treat wastewater. Government grants, to help provide school places (or other grant sources for example the Local Economic Partnership). Planning obligations – S106 (infrastructure that provides site specific mitigation).
    [Show full text]
  • 24Th MODEL RAILWAY EXHIBITION
    2001 24th MODEL RAILWAY EXHIBITION SOUVENIR PROGRAMME Opening Hours:- R Rickatrack Mon, Tues, Thurs, Fri, Sat 9am – 4:55pm M Model Railways Closed all day Wed & Sun R (S & D Noyce, established 1936) www.rickatrack.co.uk NEW AND SECONDHAND PART EXCHANGE COMPETITIVE PRICES LARGE STOCKS OF:- LIMA RATIO HORNBY SPRINGSIDE BACHMANN WILLS DAPOL LANGLEY ACCESSORIES REPLICA SUPERQUICK GRAHAM FARISH PC TRANSFERS PECO RAILMATCH PAINTS PLUS MUCH MORE CHECK OUT OUR WEBSITE FOR Latest releases Local events Catalogue download Special offers Sale items Secondhand Site updated at least once a month WATCH THE WINDOW FOR MONTHLY SPECIAL OFFERS Rickatrack Model Railways 347/9 Victoria Avenue, Southend-on-Sea, Essex. SS2 6NH Telephone: 01702 346079 Email: [email protected] 2 THE MID ESSEX MODEL RAILWAY CLUB Welcome to our 24th model railway interested in railway modelling and would like exhibition, the seventh here at Shenfield High to find out more about the Mid Essex Model School. We have organised a show of similar Railway Club and its activities then please size to last year’s with twenty-one layouts in contact one of the stewards or write to the gauges “N” to “O”. Again we have tried to Secretary whose address appears below. keep up the standard and hope that the selec- Finally, we hope you will have a pleasant tion will cater for all interests from the junior day and thank you for supporting this event. modellers to finescale scratch-builders. Should you have difficulties there are Other attractions for your enjoyment first aiders attending the exhibition. Dressed today are rides on the live steam railway and a in green uniforms, their first aid room is bus trip to Shenfield Station.
    [Show full text]