Chichester District Council

Infrastructure Business Plan

2018/2023

March 2018

www.chichester.gov.uk/planningpolicy

1

Contents Page No.

Foreword 3 1. Purpose of the Infrastructure Business Plan 4 2. Infrastructure Projects 5-17 3. CIL Implementation Plan 18-22 4. CIL Cash flow and Spending Plan 23-27 5. Conclusions 28

Appendices

A. Full Infrastructure Project list City, Town & Parish Projects 30-68 Chichester District Council Projects 68-82 West Sussex County Council Projects 82-99 Infrastructure Commissioners Projects 100-106 B. CIL Applicable Housing Trajectories 107-114 C. Infrastructure Prioritisation Process, Monitoring & Governance 115-121 D. Funding Source Review 122-137 E. Project Pro-forma 138 F. Regulation 123 list 139-140 G. IBP Glossary 141

2

Foreword

This Infrastructure Business Plan (IBP) covers the Chichester Local Plan area, it excludes parts of the district that fall within the South Downs National Park because the South Downs National Park Authority is responsible for this area.

Local communities are frequently concerned that the provision of infrastructure (by which we mean roads, flood defences, schools, doctors’ surgeries, children’s playgrounds etc.) does not keep pace with the rate of new house building. One purpose of the IBP is to ensure that infrastructure is provided at the right time and in the right place so that this problem does not get worse in the future.

Infrastructure can be paid for in several different ways, for example:  Customer bills – to telephone and broadband companies and water companies to supply fresh water and to take away and treat wastewater.  Government grants, to help provide school places (or other grant sources from Europe or the Local Economic Partnership).  Planning obligations – S106 (infrastructure that provides site specific mitigation).  Community Infrastructure Levy (a levy on certain types of new development which creates net additional floorspace)

Sometimes different funding sources have to be combined to pay for new infrastructure. The IBP shows which funding sources will contribute to each infrastructure project. It also identifies funding shortfalls, and the appendix contains the method for prioritising the infrastructure which could be funded from CIL.

CIL eligible projects relate to the cumulative growth of the area. In the early years from the introduction of CIL there will be little money collected, so fewer, or less expensive projects will be funded from the CIL (this does not negate the importance of prioritising these). As the years progress, and development gets underway, the amount of money collected from CIL will steadily increase, which will enable more substantial infrastructure projects to be delivered.

The IBP can never be precise about the amount of money that will be available; it is just the best estimate at any given point in time. Because of this it is a ‘living’ document which will be kept under review, and updated and rolled forward each year to reflect how much money has been collected, and for future years how much CIL is predicted to be collected from future development.

Some of the CIL will be passed to the parish councils to be spent on infrastructure of their choice. Parishes which don’t have a Neighbourhood Plan will get 15% of the CIL collected from new development in the parish (capped at £100 per existing Council tax dwelling each year). This increases to 25% (uncapped) for those that have made Neighbourhood Plans.

I would like to thank all the organisations who provided the information to help put this document together, and hope that you will find it useful.

Councillor Susan Taylor Cabinet Member for Housing and Planning 3

1 Purpose of the Infrastructure Business Plan

Introduction 1.1 This Infrastructure Business Plan (IBP) sets out the current understanding of infrastructure required to support the delivery of the Chichester Local Plan to 2029, and sets out a method for prioritising the projects to be funded from Chichester’s Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), which was implemented on 1 February 2016.

1.2 The IBP has been prepared by officers from Chichester District Council and West Sussex County Council with input from the Parish and Town Councils and Ward Members within the Local Plan area; nominated County Councillors; and relevant Infrastructure Delivery Commissioners.

1.3 The IBP prioritises infrastructure via a five year rolling programme for its delivery, and identifies other possible sources of funding. The CIL Regulation 123 list identifies which types of infrastructure could be funded from CIL. Funding from S106 sources and provided entirely from infrastructure delivery partners is considered within this IDP to be committed.

1.4 The IBP identifies the extent of the funding gap. CIL will help to bridge the gap, but won’t completely fill it. There will therefore be a need for prioritisation along with exploration of external funding opportunities and innovative approaches to financing which will require strong partnership working arrangements with infrastructure providers.

1.5 Prioritisation will be informed by the Local Plan housing trajectory (the phasing of development and its supporting infrastructure). This will ensure infrastructure delivery is aligned with growth. The governance arrangements which have been put in place to prioritise and ensure the timely delivery of projects are set out in Appendix C.

1.6 The IBP five year rolling programme is updated each year to reflect the most up to date housing trajectory and infrastructure requirements across the plan area. It is thus a ‘living’ document.

4

2 Infrastructure Projects

Introduction 2.1 Before prioritising infrastructure it is necessary to consider infrastructure needs across the plan area in their totality. Consequently, the IBP identifies all strategic infrastructure requirements necessary to support the anticipated growth in the Local Plan to 2029. The project list will evolve as further details are known, but will reflect the best information available at the time.

2.2 An Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP), October 2014 identified the original infrastructure requirements associated with the planned growth across the Chichester Plan area to 2029. This IDP was submitted as supporting evidence to both the Local Plan and CIL Charging Schedule examinations.

2.3 The IDP has subsequently been kept up to date through the IBP. The projects presented in this chapter were reviewed by the IBP Officers Group between April and June 2017. The projects were reviewed in light of the following key factors and, therefore, the project list included within this IBP reflects current understanding and must not be taken to represent an exhaustive list of requirements through to 2029:  Infrastructure demand levels and adequacy of the infrastructure project list based on the latest understanding of housing and other development proposals  The timing of project delivery based on the latest housing trajectory (November 2016)  Best information currently available for existing or planned infrastructure capacity across the plan area

2.4 It should be noted that costs identified for a project are indicative as, in many cases, full design and implementation costs have not yet been determined. The indicative project cost is based on 2017 figures and will be reviewed where necessary as part of the annual update of the Infrastructure Delivery Plan.

2.5 A summary of all strategic infrastructure projects (excluding Parish Projects) from all funding sources, categorised by Local Plan spatial area, is provided in table 2. The S106 projects are linked to specific planning applications, whereas the CIL and other funding source projects relate to cumulative growth of the Local Plan area. The total list of projects including those put forward by the City, Town and Parish Councils is provided in appendix A.

5

Potential Projects and Spending Profile for IBP from all funding sources

Key to colour coding Funding Sources Mainly CIL Other Mainly S106 Mainly government grant with S278 and other Unknown at present

Table 2: List of strategic infrastructure projects from all funding sources (this excludes City Town and Parish projects, which are shown in Appendix A)

Short term projects (2018-2023) IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app. Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost S106 £ Other IBP/350 District Transport S106 Smarter choices Bike It project Developers / WSCC / CDC £60,000 £60,000.00 Wide IBP/680 District Transport S106 Smarter choices Bike It project Developers / WSCC / CDC £75,000 £75,000.00 Wide IBP/679 District Transport S106 Smarter choices Bike It project Developers / WSCC / CDC £75,000 £75,000.00 Wide IBP/288 District Green Other Local Drainage - Local watercourse WSCC PC, CDC & WSCC £250k £250,000.00 Wide Infrastructure network improvements identified on the West Sussex Local Flood Risk Managements Priority List. IBP/707 District Public CIL Mobile ANPR camera to be fitted Sussex Police £14,000 £14,000.00 Wide services into fleet vehicle IBP/706 District Public CIL Fixed site ANPR (with no Sussex Police £24,000 £24,000.00 Wide services infrastructure in place) IBP/705 District Public CIL 2 additional vehicles to increase Sussex Police £63,360 £63,360.00 Wide services Chichester fleet capacity IBP/580 District Utility Services Other Broadband roll out to 13,452 Public and Openreach/WSCC £0.00 Wide premises (100% of premises) of commercial these 9,429 (70%) connected to funding enable superfast fibre broadband connection. 2,372 (17.6%) connected to enable basic (between 2 and 24Mbps) fibre broadband connection. 726 premises (5.4%) built by commercial roll out or other county (cross border) IBP/665 East West Transport CIL Following recent Road Space Audit, WSCC £0.00 Corridor area-wide parking management in Chichester City. IBP/658 East West Transport CIL City Centre cycle parking. WSCC £250,000 £250,000.00 Corridor IBP/654 East West Transport CIL Following recent Road Space Audit, WSCC 250,000 £250,000.00 Corridor area-wide parking management required in North East Chichester.

6

IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app. Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost S106 £ Other IBP/655 East West Transport CIL Following recent Road Space Audit, WSCC 250,000 £250,000.00 Corridor area-wide parking management required in West Chichester. IBP/656 East West Transport CIL Sustainable Transport Corridor - City WSCC £500,000 £500,000.00 Corridor Centre to Portfield and improvements to sustainable transport facilities on Oving Road corridor. IBP/657 East West Transport CIL School access improvements - WSCC £50,000 £50,000.00 Corridor Chichester. Drop off/pick up arrangements at expanded schools. IBP/353 East West Transport CIL Westhampnett Road/ St Pancras/ CIL WSCC / CDC £1.8m - £2,100,000.00 Corridor Spitalfield Lane/ St James Road £2.1m double mini roundabouts junction improvement. To include improvements to sustainable transport facilities along Westhampnett Road. IBP/355 East West Transport CIL RTPI screens at key locations WSCC £120,000 £120,000.00 Corridor (12 screens) IBP/660 East West Transport CIL School access improvements - WSCC £50,000 £50,000.00 Corridor Bourne. Drop off/pick up arrangements at expanded schools. IBP/669 East West Transport CIL Provision of public bridleway from WSCC £100,000 £100,000.00 Corridor B2145 along public footpath 190 to new A27 foot and cycle bridge IBP/670 East West Transport CIL Provision of cycle route between WSCC £65,000 £65,000.00 Corridor Whitehouse Farm development (west of Chichester) and Salthill Road IBP/676 East West Transport CIL Improve links between the £120,000 £120,000.00 Corridor communities of Hambrook and Woodmancote by upgrading FP251 to bridleway IBP/678 East West Transport CIL Improve the surface of the WSCC £170,000 £170,000.00 Corridor Chichester Canal towpath for walkers and cyclists IBP/348 East West Transport S106 O/11/05283/ Shopwyke Road diversion S106 Developer Directly £0.00 Corridor OUT providing IBP/342 East West Transport S106 CC/08/0353 Toucan crossing on Oaklands Way S106 Developer Directly £0.00 Corridor 3/OUT providing IBP/341 East West Transport S106 CC/08/0353 Graylingwell cycle route 2 along S106 Developer Directly £0.00 Corridor 3/OUT north side of Westhampnett Road providing (opp St James’ Road to connect with existing footpath rear of Story Road) IBP/344 East West Transport S106 CC/08/0353 Kingsmead Avenue / Palmers Field S106 Developer Directly £0.00 Corridor 3/OUT Avenue traffic management providing IBP/345 East West Transport S106 O/11/05283/ Foot / cycle bridge across the A27 S106 Developer Directly £0.00 Corridor OUT south of Portfield Roundabout providing IBP/347 East West Transport S106 O/11/05283/ Shared footway / cycleway along S106 Developer Directly £0.00 Corridor OUT south side of A27 to new access to providing Shopwyke site IBP/340 East West Transport S106 CC/08/0353 Graylingwell cycle route 1 Wellington S106 Developer Directly £0.00 Corridor 3/OUT Road – Oaklands Way providing 7

IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app. Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost S106 £ Other IBP/343 East West Transport S106 CC/08/0353 Westhampnett Road / Portfield Way S106 Developer Directly £0.00 Corridor 3/OUT (nr Sainsbury's) junction providing improvement IBP/539 East West Transport S106 O/11/05283/ Extension/diversion of number 55 S106 Developer £0.00 Corridor OUT bus route IBP/346 East West Transport S106 O/11/05283/ Foot / cycle bridge across the A27 to S106 Developer Directly £0.00 Corridor OUT Coach Road providing IBP/682 East West Transport S106 Smarter choices Bike It project S106 Developers / WSCC / CDC £80,000 £80,000.00 Corridor IBP/339 East West Transport S278 14/04284/O A27 improvements to six junctions: S278 developers, Highways England Corridor UT Fishbourne (£2,5m), Stockbridge WSCC and (£3.8m), Whyke (£3.2m), Bognor Highways Road (£1.8m), Portfield (£891,360) England. and Oving Road (£660,960). In addition, 2 further mitigation requirements are A27/A259 Bognor Road roundabout (£595,000- £915,000). Updated design at A27/B2145 Whyke junction from Pagham developers without quoting costs. B2166/B2145 roundabout at Hunston (£76,000-£113,000). Whyke junction, Chichester Free School scheme IBP/330 East West Education CIL SB/14/0280 Expansion of existing primary Basic Needs Grant WSCC / academy provider £3 million for £3,000,000.00 Corridor 0/OUT school(s) across the Chichester will need to be half form locality by up to 1/2 Form Entry secured to reduce entry the funding Subject to required from CIL. feasibility & site assessment IBP/331 East West Education CIL Expansion of existing primary Basic Needs Grant WSCC / academy provider £3 million for £3,000,000.00 Corridor schools across the Bourne locality in will need to be half form excess of 1/2 Form Entry secured to reduce entry the funding Subject to required from CIL. feasibility & site assessment IBP/378 East West Education Other Music Teaching Building University funded University ca £3.5m £3,500,000.00 Corridor IBP/377 East West Education Other Academic Teaching Building University funded University ca £5.9m £5,900,000.00 Corridor IBP/327 East West Education S106 School site and provision of a new S106 &WSCC WSCC / academy provider £5.4 - £6m £10,600,000.0 Corridor primary school for the West of (including Basic (1Form 0 Chichester SDL; 1 Form Entry Need Grant) Entry) initially but the site should be £9.5-£10,6m expandable to 2Form Entry to (2Form accommodate the latter phases of Entry) development IBP/329 East West Education S106 Site for a 1 Form Entry primary S106 & Basic WSCC / academy provider £5.4 - £6m £10,600,000.0 Corridor school expandable to 2Form Entry Need Grant (1Form 0 with contributions towards a new Entry) 1Form Entry primary school from £9.5-£10,6m Graylingwell site (2Form 8

IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app. Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost S106 £ Other Entry)

IBP/328 East West Education S106 School site and provision of a new S106 &WSCC WSCC / academy provider £5.4 - £6m £10,600,000.0 Corridor 1Form Entry primary school for the (including Basic (1Form 0 Tangmere SDL; the site should be Need Grant) Entry) expandable to 2Form Entry £9.5-£10,6m (2Form Entry) IBP/398 East West Health CIL NHS Medical Centre West of £3,300,000 total Coastal West Sussex 3,300,000 £3,300,000.00 Corridor Chichester SDL NHS Clinical Commissioning sources/LIFT/third Group party development (£2m expected to be funded by LIFT) IBP/190 East West Social S106 West of Chichester – Temporary Provided by Developer, will require a Unknown £0.00 Corridor Infrastructure community facilities Developer under community lead either S106 Chichester City Council, or other nominated or new group IBP/189 East West Social S106 O/11/05283/ Shopwhyke – Temporary community Provide by Developer, will require a Unknown £0.00 Corridor Infrastructure OUT Facilities Developer under community lead either Oving S106 PC, or other nominated or new group IBP/303 East West Green CIL New Sports pitch (Bosham) Parish/WSCC £100k From £100,000.00 Corridor Infrastructure WSCC IBP/305 East West Green CIL Provision of Artificial Grass Bourne £700k - £1m £1,000,000.00 Corridor Infrastructure Pitch/MUGA (Southbourne) (links Community From with 304 & 306) College, WSCC, WSCC, Developer Developer contributions and contributions Sport England , Sport England, Bourne Community College IBP/194 East West Green CIL Enhancements to the Lavant Cost unknown, EA, CDC, Goodwood 50,000 £50,000.00 Corridor Infrastructure Biodiversity Opportunity Area – grant funding, Estates (Landowner), enhancements to the stretch of the local fundraising. Sussex Wildlife Trust, Lavant, north of the Westhampnett Contractor, SDNPA, strategic development site, Southern Water. connecting to the SDNP. IBP/304 East West Green CIL Provision of Youth facilities WSCC and £? From £0.00 Corridor Infrastructure (Southbourne) (links with 305 & 306) developer WSCC, contributions Developer contributions IBP/196 East West Green CIL Brandy Hole Copse – restoration CIL CDC, BHC Management £10,000 £10,000.00 Corridor Infrastructure and enhancement works at Brandy Board Hole local Nature Reserve IBP/291 East West Green CIL Local Drainage - The Avenue, None CDC, WSCC £10k £10,000.00 Corridor Infrastructure Hambrook Watercourse re- construction 9

IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app. Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost S106 £ Other IBP/307 East West Green CIL Establishment and maintenance of Cost unknown, Southbourne Parish Council £? From £0.00 Corridor Infrastructure an accessible Green Ring around Sport England, Developer the village of Southbourne, providing Sustrans, WSCC, contributions a variety of green infrastructure Parish Council , Sport assets, including informal open England, space, allotments, a playing field, a Sustrans, footpath/cycleway network, WSCC children’s play areas IBP/302 East West Green CIL Resite football club (Bosham) Parish Council £500k £500,000.00 Corridor Infrastructure IBP/306 East West Green CIL Youth skate park (Southbourne) WSCC, Developer £80k - £120,000.00 Corridor Infrastructure (links with 304 & 305) contributions and £120k From Parish Council WSCC, Developer contributions , Parish Council IBP/711 East West Green Parklands Chichester daylighting of WSCC £500,000 £500,000.00 Corridor Infrastructure culvert with landscaping. IBP/308 East West Green S106 Amenity tree planting Harbour SPA Parish Council £? From £0.00 Corridor Infrastructure Solent Disturbance & mitigation Developer Project contributions , WSCC, CDC IBP/391 East West Utility Services Other Water, drainage and power to University, utility University Not known £0.00 Corridor support the above developments companies and as yet The private cost and allocation of costs to the University, private partners and utility companies is still to be determined IBP/397 East West Utility Services Other Upgrade to Tangmere Wastewater Investment by Southern Water Corridor treatment Works (WWTW) Southern Water IBP/379 East West Housing Other Student Residential - University/private University ca £15m £15,000,000.0 Corridor Redevelopment of Havenstoke (252 funded 0 new units) and redevelopment of Hammond (77 new units) IBP/659 Manhood Transport CIL School access improvements - WSCC £50,000 £50,000.00 Peninsula Manhood. Drop off/pick up arrangements at expanded schools. IBP/349 Manhood Transport CIL A286 Birdham Road / B2201 (Selsey S106 WSCC / Developer £150,000 £150,000.00 Peninsula Tram Roundabout) junction improvement IBP/667 Manhood Transport CIL Green Links across the Manhood. WSCC £100,000 £100,000.00 Peninsula (GLaM project). North Selsey to Medmerry Trail - provision of public bridleway route from Paddock Lane, along Golf Links Lane to access track that circles the new 10

IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app. Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost S106 £ Other Environment Agency tidal bund

IBP/672 Manhood Transport CIL Provision of footpath linking East WSCC £10,000 £10,000.00 Peninsula Bracklesham Drive to beach (opposite FP4) IBP/376 Manhood Transport S106 Green links across the Manhood. WSCC Integrated WSCC and RSPB £300,000 £300,000.00 Peninsula (GLaM project). Pagham to Works Programme Medmerry Trail - provision of public 2017/18 & S106 footpath and permissive cycle route to B2145 to access track that circles the new Environmental Agency tidal bund. IBP/544 Manhood Transport S106 HN/15/0348 Hunston Road cycle scheme - WSCC £0.00 Peninsula 9/FUL shared use pedestrian/cycle path to link the proposed Highways England footbridge at Whyke roundabout with the south of the A27 IBP/666 Manhood Transport S106 EW/4016/05 Green links across the Manhood Capital Funding WSCC £300,000 £300,000.00 Peninsula EW/1795/07 (GLaM project) Bracklesham to EW/5640/06 Medmerry trail - provision of public EWB/627/07 bridleway route between B2198 and access track that circles the new Environment Agency tidal bund. IBP/332 Manhood Education CIL Expansion of existing primary Basic Needs Grant WSCC / academy provider £3 million for £3,000,000.00 Peninsula schools across the Manhood locality will need to be half form in excess of 1/2 Form Entry secured to reduce entry the funding Subject to required from CIL. feasibility & site assessment IBP/193 Manhood Social S106 D/07/04732/ Donnington Church Hall – extension Local fundraising Donnington PCC through £250-300k £300,000.00 Peninsula Infrastructure FUL, and private Management Committee D/11/01198/ donations, S106, (although are identifying FUL; NHB or grants? some capacity issues or lack D/12/04410/ of relevant experience to FUL project manage) IBP/289 Manhood Green CIL Local Drainage - Crooked Lane, FDGIA/WSCC WSCC £100k £100,000.00 Peninsula Infrastructure Birdham Surface Water Drainage Improvements IBP/290 Manhood Green CIL Coast Protection -Selsey – Wittering FDGIA est. £750k CDC £1,000,000 £1,000,000.00 Peninsula Infrastructure Beach Management 2016-2021 CDC est. £250k IBP/293 Manhood Green CIL Local land Drainage - East Beach CDC 100,000- £150,000.00 Peninsula Infrastructure Sea Outfall 150,000 IBP/197 Manhood Green Other FLOW Project (Fixing and Linking Heritage Lottery MWHG and FLOW Project 545,300 £545,300.00 Peninsula Infrastructure Our Wetlands) – improving and Funding secured. Board (including CDC) enhancing the wetlands habitat on the Manhood Peninsula IBP/319 North of Transport CIL Improve local footpaths, cycle tracks £0.00 the District & equestrian ways (Kirdford) 11

IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app. Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost S106 £ Other IBP/321 North of Social CIL Village Social & Recreational Hub £0.00 the District Infrastructure (Kirdford) IBP/320 North of Green CIL New Road, Parking area and SUDS £0.00 the District Infrastructure pond and play area (Kirdford) IBP/318 North of Green CIL New footpaths & Community £0.00 the District Infrastructure Amenity Space (Kirdford) IBP/322 North of Green CIL Improvements or rebuild of Sports CIL and other Sports Association/Parish £500,000 £500,000.00 the District Infrastructure Association Pavilion to create Council community sports facility

Medium to long term projects (2024-2029)

IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app. Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost £ S106 Other IBP/629 East West Transport Construction of chord to enable Network Rail £55,000,000 £55,000,000.00 Corridor trains to run directly between Bognor Regis and Chichester, rather than via an interchange at Barnham. IBP/351 East West Transport CIL Chichester bus / rail interchange CIL WSCC / CDC/ TBC £0.00 Corridor improvements (Cross reference Stagecoach / Network IBP/206) Rail IBP/352 East West Transport CIL Northgate Gyratory junction CIL WSCC / CDC £986,000 - £1,600,000.00 Corridor improvement £1.6m IBP/671 East West Transport CIL Provision of cycle route between WSCC £150,000 £150,000.00 Corridor Summersdale and East Lavant IBP/668 East West Transport CIL Green Links across the Manhood. WSCC £250,000 £250,000.00 Corridor (GLaM project). Public bridleway connection between bridleways 192_1 and 2792 across Vinnetrow Road. A user controlled crossing of Vinnetrow Road is possible but likely will be determined by Highways England review of A27 and associated local network IBP/354 East West Transport CIL Bus lane along A259 approaching CIL WSCC / CDC/ bus £1.2m £1,200,000.00 Corridor Bognor Road Roundabout operators IBP/356 East West Transport CIL Variable Message Signing (VMS) CIL WSCC £8,000 £8,000.00 Corridor IBP/357 East West Transport CIL Southgate Gyratory junction CIL WSCC £200,000 £200,000.00 Corridor improvement IBP/358 East West Transport CIL Gap-filling to complete the CIL WSCC £500,000 £500,000.00 Corridor Chichester Cycle Network: Whyke, Stockbridge, Summersdale, City Centre, south-west of the City Centre, east of the City Centre. IBP/359 East West Transport CIL Portfield cycle route CIL WSCC £120,000 £120,000.00 Corridor IBP/360 East West Transport CIL Summersdale cycle route CIL WSCC £230,000 £230,000.00 Corridor 12

IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app. Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost £ S106 Other IBP/365 East West Transport S106 Road link between A27 / A285 S106 Developer £0.00 Corridor junction and Tangmere Road IBP/364 East West Transport S106 TG/07/04577/ Chichester - Tangmere cycle route S106 Developer £630,000 £630,000.00 Corridor FUL; TG/11/04058/ FUL, TG/12/011739 /OUT, TG/14/00797/ FUL IBP/366 East West Transport S106 North / south link road and S106 Developer TBC £0.00 Corridor improvements to nearby roads connecting with southern access to West of Chichester SDL IBP/370 East West Transport S106 Sherborne Road / St Paul’s Road S106 Developer £540,000 £540,000.00 Corridor junction improvement IBP/371 East West Transport S106 Cathedral Way / Via Ravenna S106 Developer £170,000 £170,000.00 Corridor junction improvement IBP/369 East West Transport S106 Sherborne Road traffic calming S106 Developer TBC £0.00 Corridor IBP/368 East West Transport S106 Parklands cycle route S106 Developer £440,000 £440,000.00 Corridor IBP/367 East West Transport S106 St Paul’s cycle route S106 Developer £140,000 £140,000.00 Corridor IBP/192 East West Social CIL SB/14/02800/ Southbourne – replacement of Age Contributions to Age Concern £500k broad £500,000.00 Corridor Infrastruct OUT Concern Building (multi-use be sought form a Southbourne, estimate ure community building) number of hopefully with the (assuming Southbourne support of the PC and tenure of land permissions NP group. secured without purchase) IBP/336 East West Social CIL Library provision as part of a new CIL WSCC & developer £75,000 - £100,000.00 Corridor Infrastruct community centre for the Tangmere £100,000 ure SDL; to include shelving and a self- service terminal IBP/335 East West Social CIL Library provision as part of a new CIL WSCC & developer £75,000 - £100,000.00 Corridor Infrastruct community centre or school for the £100,000 ure West of Chichester SDL; to include shelving and a self- service terminal IBP/396 East West Green CIL Bosham Harbour new inland FCRM Environment Agency 460,000 £460,000.00 Corridor Infrastruct defences. GiA/Contributions ure IBP/710 East West Public and CIL Reconfiguration of Westhampnett WSCC 5,000,000 £5,000,000.00 Corridor Communit transfer station/household waste y Services recycling site IBP/362 Manhood Transport CIL Selsey – Witterings cycle route CIL WSCC £200,000 £200,000.00 Peninsula IBP/361 Manhood Transport CIL Chichester – Selsey cycle route CIL WSCC TBC £0.00 Peninsula IBP/675 Manhood Transport CIL Provision of bridleway link between WSCC £400,000 £400,000.00 Peninsula South Mundham and Birdham, possibly along existing public 13

IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app. Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost £ S106 Other footpaths

IBP/363 Manhood Transport CIL B2145 / B2166 junction CIL WSCC / Developer £100,000 £100,000.00 Peninsula improvement IBP/673 Manhood Transport CIL Provision of public bridleway along WSCC £60,000 £60,000.00 Peninsula public footpaths 75 and 3662 IBP/674 Manhood Transport CIL Provision of cycle and equestrian WSCC £50,000 £50,000.00 Peninsula link between Keynor Lane and Highleigh along public footpath 64 IBP/287 Manhood Green CIL Coast Protection - Selsey East FDGIA, a CDC £5m £5,000,000.00 Peninsula Infrastruct Beach – Raising of the Sea Wall contribution likely ure to be required (shortfall) IBP/570 Manhood Green CIL Coast Protection -Selsey – Wittering FDGIA est. £750k CDC £1,000,000 £1,000,000.00 Peninsula Infrastruct Beach Management 2021-2026 CDC est. £250k ure IBP/586 Manhood Green Other New visitor centre at Pagham to be confirmed RSPB £0.00 Peninsula Infrastruct Harbour Local Nature Reserve ure IBP/333 North of Education CIL Further expansion of existing CIL & WSCC WSCC / academy £3 million for £3,000,000.00 the District primary schools across the (including Basic provider half form entry Billingshurst locality by up to 1/2 Need Grant) Subject to Form Entry. Wisborough Green feasibility & primary school will be expanded by site 5 places per year of age in assessment September 2017. It is planned for Loxwood primary school to be expanded by 5 places per year of age in September 2018. Further places may be needed at Rudgwick primary school in 2019-2020

Unphased projects

IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost £ S106 Other IBP/372 District Transport Air Quality Action Plan measures – £0.00 Wide still investigating IBP/540 East West Transport S106 O/11/05283/O Oving cycle route S106 Developer £0.00 Corridor UT IBP/206 East West Transport CIL Chichester -Southern Gateway Area £0.00 Corridor should be properly masterplanned to include the provision of a bus/rail interchange and proposed improvements to traffic and pedestrian circulation (Cross reference IBP/351) IBP/211 East West Transport CIL Fishbourne -Traffic Calming Fishbourne Parish £0.00 Corridor Measures Council, CDC, WSCC 14

IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost £ S106 Other IBP/199 East West Transport CIL Boxgrove - Improvements to Boxgrove Parish £0.00 Corridor pedestrian safety and reducing Council, CDC & traffic speeds in Boxgrove, whilst WSCC protecting the special character of the conservation area IBP/724 East West Transport Other A27/B2233 Nyton Rd Junction WSCC Corridor improvement Cost £202,000- £300,000. IBP/210 East West Transport CIL Fishbourne - Improve pavements WSCC, Fisbourne £0.00 Corridor Parish Council IBP/543 East West Transport S106 Regular bus services between S106 Developer £0.00 Corridor Westhampnett SDL and the City centre. IBP/213 East West Transport CIL Halnaker - Improvements to Boxgrove Parish £0.00 Corridor pedestrian safety and reducing Council, CDC, WSCC traffic speeds in Halnaker, particularly along the A286, whilst protecting the special character of the conservation area IBP/542 East West Transport S106 Regular bus services between west S106 Developer £0.00 Corridor of Chichester SDL and the City centre. IBP/538 East West Transport S106 O/11/05283/O Oving Road crossroads closure S106 Developer £0.00 Corridor UT IBP/387 East West Transport S106 College Lane Traffic No funding by WSCC ca £300k £300,000.00 Corridor Calming/Change - One Way access University defined and Public Realm works to College Lane and Spitalfield Lane IBP/388 East West Transport Other Multi level Car Park University to fund University tbc £0.00 Corridor IBP/386 East West Transport CIL Cycle route/Footway with lighting University to fund University ca £0.1m £500,000.00 Corridor extension from the University central part with Local area to Graylingwell North Authority CIL IBP/385 East West Transport S106 Eastern Access Road Assumed to be HCA and Linden LLP provided by £0.00 Corridor funded by HCA HCA/Linden and Linden LLP as LLP a part of planning consent and S106 IBP/384 East West Transport Other New Internal Campus Road and Link University to fund University ca £0.5m £500,000.00 Corridor to Eastern Access Road but there is a significant funding gap IBP/383 East West Transport CIL Cycle route/Footway with lighting to University to fund University ca £0.1m £500,000.00 Corridor the centre of the Campus part with Local Authority CIL IBP/541 East West Transport S106 Direct and frequent bus services S106 Developer £0.00 Corridor between Tangmere and Chichester City. IBP/382 East West Education Other Other Academic and Support No detail as yet University Not known at £0.00 Corridor facilities - Learning Resource present Extension, Sports Building, Gymnasium, Students Union building extension 15

IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost £ S106 Other IBP/593 East West Education CIL For the west of Chichester SDL 40 WSCC £0.00 Corridor new nursery places to be provided as part of new primary school. IBP/208 East West Social CIL Chichester - Re-introduction of £0.00 Corridor Infrastruct natural stone paving within the City ure centre, particularly for The Pallants, Westgate, Northgate, Southgate and Eastgate Square, as funds permit.

IBP/207 East West Social CIL Chichester - Preservation and £0.00 Corridor Infrastruct maintenance of traditional stone ure flagged streets, which must be protected. To ensure that all of these surfaces are protected and repaired as necessary, using traditional techniques and materials. IBP/204 East West Social CIL St Martin's Street/ Crooked S CDC, WSCC £0.00 Corridor Infrastruct Twitten, Chichester This is a ure popular pedestrian route currently poorly maintained and detailed. Area should be redesigned to include the provision of new paving and new street furniture, as well as a new retail unit. IBP/297 East West Green CIL 3G football pitches at Chichester Football Chichester City United £0.00 Corridor Infrastruct City United FC (Chichester) Foundation, CDC FC ure grant, Club funds IBP/301 East West Green CIL Store and toilet facility at New Park S106, CDC £100k? £100,000.00 Corridor Infrastruct Road (Chichester) Capital ure IBP/324 East West Green CIL Improvements to sports pavilion £0.00 Corridor Infrastruct (Boxgrove) ure IBP/296 East West Green CIL Development of new clubhouse for Sport England Chichester Bowmen £150k £150,000.00 Corridor Infrastruct Chichester Bowmen to incorporate Grants/Loans, ure an indoor shooting range Club reserves, (Chichester) CDC grant IBP/299 East West Green CIL Permanent indoor tennis courts Lawn Tennis Chichester Racquet £0.00 Corridor Infrastruct (Chichester) Association, Club and Fitness Club ure funds, CDC grant IBP/298 East West Green CIL Completion of 400m running track at University of University of £1.365m £1,365,000.00 Corridor Infrastruct University of Chichester. Chichester, Chichester/CR&AC ure CR&AC, CIL, NHB, Sport England IBP/300 East West Green CIL Improved sports pitches and pavilion S106, Football £200k? £200,000.00 Corridor Infrastruct at the Southern end of Oaklands Foundation, ECB ure Park. IBP/295 East West Green CIL Development of water based CPPHC Club CPPHC £1.3m £1,300,000.00 Corridor Infrastruct Artificial Grass Pitch for hockey and Fundraising, ure associated pavilion/clubhouse England Hockey, Sport England, CIL

16

IBP Id Location Category CIL Planning app Scheme Funding Sources Delivery Lead Cost Range Total Max Cost £ S106 Other IBP/294 East West Green CIL Development of a new cricket Sport England CDC £350k £350,000.00 Corridor Infrastruct pavilion for Chichester Priory Park Grants, Club ure Cricket Club fundraising IBP/212 East West Utility CIL Fishbourne - Relocating overhead Utility Companies £0.00 Corridor Services services underground IBP/309 Manhood Social CIL Public space enhancements by East £0.00 Peninsula Infrastruct Beach green (in addition to skate ure park, better play facilities, all weather sports courts) (Selsey) IBP/313 Manhood Social S106 SY/14/02186/ Extension to Selsey Centre £0.00 Peninsula Infrastruct OUTEIA; ure SY/15/00490/ FUL IBP/314 Manhood Social CIL Soft play area/indoor play area for £0.00 Peninsula Infrastruct children (Selsey) ure IBP/325 Manhood Green CIL Watersports Centre at Bracklesham £0.00 Peninsula Infrastruct Bay (East Wittering and ure Bracklesham) IBP/114 Manhood Green CIL Football and Cricket clubhouse Sports Dream £400,000 £400,000.00 Peninsula Infrastruct match funding ure available IBP/113 Manhood Green CIL Development of better facilities at Selsey Town Council, £0.00 Peninsula Infrastruct East Beach (showers, changing, CDC ure restaurant/café, water sports)

IBP/326 Manhood Green CIL Outdoor Gym (East Wittering and £0.00 Peninsula Infrastruct Bracklesham) ure IBP/315 Manhood Green CIL Access improvements to and £0.00 Peninsula Infrastruct establishment of coastal path with ure way finding (Manhood Peninsular)

IBP/323 North of Green CIL Reserve football and cricket pitches CIL and other Sports £150,000 £150,000.00 the District Infrastruct Association/Parish ure Council

17

3 CIL Implementation Plan

3.1. Table 3 below sets out all of the strategic projects put forward, which could be funded in whole or in part by the CIL for the short term. These have been prioritised using the methodology set out in Appendix C.

Table 3: List of the strategic infrastructure projects put forward for CIL funding in the short term (to 2023)

Prioritisation Location Project Type Project Name Project Status Est Cost Funding Requested Amount to be Sources CIL granted from CIL by year 1 Critical No CIL Projects 2 Essential East West Local road network Westhampnett Road/ St Pancras/ Spitalfield Lane/ £1.8m - £2.1m CIL £500,000.00 £500,000 in IBP/353 Corridor St James Road double mini roundabouts junction year 2019- improvement. To include improvements to 2020 sustainable transport facilities along Westhampnett Road. Chichester City Transport Strategy – to reduce traffic congestion and improve safety at key junctions 2 Essential Manhood Local road network A286 Birdham Road / B2201 (Selsey Tram £150,000 with £39,000 £111,000.00 IBP/349 Peninsula Roundabout) junction improvement Chichester from historic S106 City Transport Strategy – to reduce traffic congestion and improve safety at key junctions 2 Essential East West Transport Following recent Road Space Audit, area-wide 250,000 £250,000.00 IBP/654 Corridor parking management required in North East Chichester. To better manage demand for parking and network management aspirations (ie sustainable mode priority) for key routes in the area). 2 Essential East West Transport Following recent Road Space Audit, area-wide 250,000 £250,000.00 IBP/655 Corridor parking management required in West Chichester. To better manage demand for parking and network management aspirations (ie sustainable mode priority) for key routes in the area). 2 Essential East West Transport Sustainable Transport Corridor - City Centre to £500,000 £500,000.00 £25,000 in IBP/656 Corridor Portfield and improvements to sustainable year 2019- transport facilities on Oving Road corridor. To 2020 increase sustainable transport mode share. £50,000 in Considering improvements to road space year 2020- allocation. 2021 £425,000 in year 2021- 2022 2 Essential East West Transport School access improvements - Chichester. Drop £50,000 £50,000.00 £50,000 in IBP/657 Corridor off/pick up arrangements at expanded schools. To year 2019- increase sustainable travel choice and modal shift 2020 for the journey to and from school. 2 Essential East West Cycle infrastructure City Centre cycle parking. To increase cycling for £250,000 £250,000.00 IBP/658 Corridor the short trips to the City Centre.

18

Prioritisation Location Project Type Project Name Project Status Est Cost Funding Requested Amount to be Sources CIL granted from CIL by year 2 Essential Manhood Transport School access improvements - Manhood. Drop £50,000 £50,000.00 £50,000 in IBP/659 Peninsula off/pick up arrangements at expanded schools. To year 2022- increase sustainable travel choice and modal shift 2023 for the journey to and from school. 2 Essential East West Transport School access improvements - Bourne. Drop £50,000 £50,000.00 £50,000 in IBP/660 Corridor off/pick up arrangements at expanded schools. To year 2020- increase sustainable travel choice and modal shift 2021 for the journey to and from school. 2 Essential East West Transport Following recent Road Space Audit, area-wide IBP/665 Corridor parking management in Chichester City. To better manage demand for parking and network management aspirations (ie sustainable mode priority) for key routes in the area). 2 Essential Manhood Primary, Secondary, Expansion of existing primary schools across the Select for CIL match £3 million for half form £3,000,000. £800,000 in IBP/332 Peninsula sixth form and Manhood locality in excess of 1/2 Form Entry To funding as the WSCC entry Subject to 00 year 2020- special educational meet statutory duty to ensure sufficient supply of has a statutory duty to feasibility & site 2021 needs school places for pupils arising from new provide school places, assessment Basic development (mitigation) subject to match Needs Grant will need to funding. be secured to reduce the funding required from CIL. 2 Essential East West Primary, Secondary, Expansion of existing primary school(s) across the Select for CIL match £3 million for half form £3,000,000. £800,000 in IBP/330 Corridor sixth form and Chichester locality by up to 1/2 Form Entry To funding as the WSCC entry Subject to 00 year 2018- special educational meet statutory duty to ensure sufficient supply of has a statutory duty to feasibility & site 2019 needs school places for pupils arising from new provide school places, assessment Basic development (mitigation) subject to match Needs Grant will need to funding. be secured to reduce the funding required from CIL. 2 Essential East West Primary, Secondary, Expansion of existing primary schools across the Select for CIL match £3 million for half form £3,000,000. £800,000 in IBP/331 Corridor sixth form and Bourne locality in excess of 1/2 Form Entry To funding as the WSCC entry Subject to 00 year 2019- special educational meet statutory duty to ensure sufficient supply of has a statutory duty to feasibility & site 2020 needs school places for pupils arising from new provide school places, assessment Basic development (mitigation) subject to match Needs Grant will need to funding. be secured to reduce the funding required from CIL. 2 Essential East West Community NHS Medical Centre West of Chichester SDL To Select for CIL funding if 3,300,000 £3,300,000 £1,300,000. £1.3m in year IBP/398 Corridor healthcare, primary amalgamate Chichester practices to cover 20 the majority of money is total NHS 00 2020-2021 care facilities & years ahead and to accommodate new match funded. This sources/LIFT/third party improvements residents/patients from planed developments project can demonstrate development (£2m it can assist the growth expected to be funded of the area. by LIFT) 3 Policy East West Smarter Choices RTPI screens at key locations Chichester City Consider selecting if £120,000 (12 screens) £120,000.00 £150,000 in High Corridor and promote Transport Strategy – to reduce short car trips to match funding is year 2020- IBP/355 sustainable modes and from the city centre identified as this project 2021 of transport supports the growth of the area provided it is for genuine community use. 3 Policy East West Biodiversity Enhancements to the Lavant Biodiversity 50,000 Cost unknown, £50,000.00 £10,000 in High Corridor measures Opportunity Area – enhancements to the stretch of grant funding, local year 2017- IBP/194 the Lavant, north of the Westhampnett strategic fundraising. 2018 & development site, connecting to the SDNP. To £40,000 in comply with NPPF 109, 114 and 117 and year 2018- 19

Prioritisation Location Project Type Project Name Project Status Est Cost Funding Requested Amount to be Sources CIL granted from CIL by year Draft Local Plan Policy 49: Biodiversity 2019

3 Policy Manhood Flood and coastal Local Drainage - Crooked Lane, Birdham Surface Not selected for CIL £100k FDGIA/WSCC £100,000.00 £0 High Peninsula erosion risk Water Drainage Improvements West Sussex Local funding because this IBP/289 management Flood Risk Management Strategy 2015 project does not support the growth of the area. 3 Policy Manhood Flood and coastal Coast Protection -Selsey – Wittering Beach Select for CIL funding if £1,000,000 FDGIA est. £0.00 £0 High Peninsula erosion risk Management 2016-2021 Policy 10 of Draft Local the majority of money is £750k CDC est. £250k IBP/290 management Plan “Mitigating and adapting to climate change” match funded. This project can demonstrate it can assist the growth of the area. 3 Policy East West Flood and coastal Local Drainage - The Avenue, Hambrook Not selected for IBP £10k None £10,000.00 High Corridor erosion risk Watercourse re-construction West Sussex Local years 2016-2021 as little IBP/291 management Flood Risk Management Strategy 2015 planned development in this cycle. 3 Policy Manhood Flood and coastal Local land Drainage - East Beach Sea Outfall Select for CIL funding if 100,000-150,000 £100,000.00 £100,000 in High Peninsula erosion risk Policy 10 of Draft Local Plan “Mitigating and the majority of money is year 2018- IBP/293 management adapting to climate change” West Sussex Local match funded. This 2019 Flood Risk Management Strategy 2015 project can demonstrate it can assist the growth of the area. 3 Policy East West Biodiversity Brandy Hole Copse – restoration and Consider selecting if £10,000 CIL £10,000.00 £10,000 in High Corridor measures enhancement works at Brandy Hole local Nature match funding is year 2020- IBP/196 Reserve NPPF policy 117. As above. Policy 15. identified as this project 2021 West of Chichester Strategic Development Site supports the growth of (draft Local Plan) the area provided it is for genuine community use. 3 Policy East West Public open space Establishment and maintenance of an accessible Consider selecting if £? From Developer £0.00 £0 High Corridor Green Ring around the village of Southbourne, match funding is contributions, Sport IBP/307 providing a variety of green infrastructure assets, identified as this project England, Sustrans, including informal open space, allotments, a supports the growth of WSCC Cost unknown, playing field, a footpath/cycleway network, the area provided it is for Sport England, children’s play areas NPPF Section 8 Promoting genuine community use. Sustrans, WSCC, Parish Healthy Communities, CDC Open Space, Sport & Council Recreation Facilities Study 2013-2029. SPNP Pre- Sub Plan Policies 2,3,7,8 and 9 and proposal 2. Provision of alternative informal recreation/leisure facilities 3 Policy District Police and Fixed site ANPR (with no infrastructure in place) £24,000 £24,000.00 High Wide emergency services New housing will place an increased demand IBP/706 upon the existing level of policing. In the absence of developer contributions towards additional infrastructure, Sussex Police would be unable to retain the high level of policing that is currently delivered.

20

Prioritisation Location Project Type Project Name Project Status Est Cost Funding Requested Amount to be Sources CIL granted from CIL by year 3 Policy District Police and Mobile ANPR camera to be fitted into fleet vehicle £14,000 £14,000.00 High Wide emergency services New housing will place an increased demand IBP/707 upon the existing level of policing. In the absence of developer contributions towards additional infrastructure, Sussex Police would be unable to retain the high level of policing that is currently delivered. 3 Policy District Police and 2 additional vehicles to increase Chichester fleet £63,360 £63,360.00 High Wide emergency services capacity New housing will place an increased IBP/705 demand upon the existing level of policing. In the absence of developer contributions towards additional infrastructure, Sussex Police would be unable to retain the high level of policing that is currently delivered. 4 Desirable North of Cycle and Improve local footpaths, cycle tracks & equestrian Parish may wish to £0.00 £0 IBP/319 the District pedestrian ways (Kirdford) Parish-wide consider funding from infrastructure their CIL 4 Desirable East West Cycle and Improve the surface of the Chichester Canal £170,000 £170,000.00 IBP/678 Corridor pedestrian towpath for walkers and cyclists The canal towpath infrastructure is a popular route for access to/from Chichester for walkers and cyclists. It is also designated part of NCN2. The pressure on the surface has increased greatly from extra use and needs improvement. 4 Desirable East West Cycle and Improve links between the communities of £120,000 £120,000.00 IBP/676 Corridor pedestrian Hambrook and Woodmancote by upgrading infrastructure FP251 to bridleway Upgrading FP251 to bridleway would provide cyclists and equestrians a safer alternative to the local road network and safer access to and from the South Downs National Park. WSLAF ambition. 4 Desirable Manhood Pedestrian Provision of footpath linking East Bracklesham £10,000 £10,000.00 IBP/672 Peninsula infrastructure Drive to beach (opposite FP4) Secure a new public access to beach, which otherwise is only lawfully accessible from the car park at southern point of B2198. An ambition West Sussex Local Access Forum (WSLAF) 4 Desirable East West Cycle infrastructure Provision of cycle route between Whitehouse £65,000 £65,000.00 IBP/670 Corridor Farm development (west of Chichester) and Salthill Road Provide a largely off-road cycle link between Chichester and entry to the South Downs National Park east of A286. 4 Desirable East West Cycle and Provision of public bridleway from B2145 along £100,000 £100,000.00 IBP/669 Corridor pedestrian public footpath 190 to new A27 foot and cycle infrastructure bridge Will provide NMUs with greater connectivity in local network. Route will also allow horse riders access to bridleways east of B2145 which are currently inaccessible

21

Prioritisation Location Project Type Project Name Project Status Est Cost Funding Requested Amount to be Sources CIL granted from CIL by year 4 Desirable Manhood Cycle and Green Links across the Manhood. (GLaM project). £100,000 £100,000.00 IBP/667 Peninsula pedestrian North Selsey to Medmerry Trail - provision of infrastructure public bridleway route from Paddock Lane, along Golf Links Lane to access track that circles the new Environment Agency tidal bund Part of route already agreed via planning consent to be dedicated bridleway. Remainder of route is already public footpath and needs uplifting to bridleway status. 4 Desirable North of Community facilities Village Social & Recreational Hub (Kirdford) On Parish may wish to £0.00 £0 IBP/321 the District land south east of Townfield consider funding from their CIL 4 Desirable North of Landscaping, New footpaths & Community Amenity Space Parish may wish to £0.00 £0 IBP/318 the District planting and (Kirdford) Development Site North of Village consider funding from woodland creation their CIL and public rights of way 4 Desirable North of Public open space New Road, Parking area and SUDS pond and play Parish may wish to £0.00 £0 IBP/320 the District area (Kirdford) Butts Common consider funding from their CIL 4 Desirable East West Playing fields, sports Resite football club (Bosham) Shared use of Not selected for IBP £500k Parish Council £500,000.00 £0 IBP/302 Corridor pitches, related build recreation ground public/school/FC unsatisfactory years 2016-2021 as little and children's play & prohibitive to promotion/advancement planned development in areas this cycle. 4 Desirable East West Playing fields, sports New Sports pitch (Bosham) Improve public spaces Not selected for IBP £100k From WSCC £100,000.00 IBP/303 Corridor pitches, related build and allow football to meet safety standards years 2016-2021 as little Parish/WSCC and children's play planned development in areas this cycle. 4 Desirable East West Playing fields, sports Provision of Youth facilities (Southbourne) (links Consider selecting if £? From WSCC, £0.00 £0 IBP/304 Corridor pitches, related build with 305 & 306) CDC Open Space, Sport & match funding is Developer contributions and children's play Recreation Facilities Study 2013-2029. SPNP Pre- identified as this project WSCC and developer areas Sub Plan Proposal 2 supports the growth of contributions the area provided it is for genuine community use. 4 Desirable North of Playing fields, sports Improvements or rebuild of Sports Association Parish may wish to £500,000 CIL and other £500,000.00 IBP/322 the District pitches, related build Pavilion to create community sports facility consider funding from and children's play Community social and health improvements their CIL areas Current sports pavilion inadequate – needs updating 4 Desirable East West Playing fields, sports Youth skate park (Southbourne) (links with 304 & Consider selecting if £80k - £120k From £120,000.00 £0 IBP/306 Corridor pitches, related build 305) SPNP Pre-Sub Plan Proposal 2 match funding is WSCC, Developer and children's play identified as this project contributions, Parish areas supports the growth of Council WSCC, the area provided it is for Developer contributions genuine community use. and Parish Council 4 Desirable East West Playing fields, sports Provision of Artificial Grass Pitch/MUGA Consider selecting if £700k - £1m From £885,522.20 £0 IBP/305 Corridor pitches, related build (Southbourne) (links with 304 & 306) CDC Open match funding is WSCC, Developer and children's play Space, Sport & Recreation Facilities Study 2013- identified as this project contributions, Sport areas 2029. SPNP Pre-Sub Plan Policy 8 and Proposal supports the growth of England, Bourne 2 the area provided it is for Community College genuine community use. Bourne Community College, WSCC, Developer contributions and Sport England 22

4 CIL Cash flow and Spending Plan

Introduction 4.1 The IBP identifies the prioritised strategic infrastructure project requirements within the Chichester Local Plan area and the potential cost of delivering it, including exploration of potential funding streams that could fill the funding gaps. An estimation of CIL receipts has been included based on the current housing site trajectory and the current CIL charging rates.

4.2 The identification of likely cash flow provides an opportunity to review the projects which require priority funding through the CIL income stream.

Estimated CIL Receipt Income 4.3 For the purposes of this IBP an estimation of CIL receipts between 2017 and 2029 has been calculated. This information will be updated as further information becomes available. Until the CIL is actually demanded, it can only ever be a best estimate, and it has been based on the following assumptions:  The trajectory of November 2016 has been used.  An average residential unit has been applied at 90sqm internal floorspace  An affordable housing rate of 30% has been applied to all developments.  Calculations are based on a CIL rate of £120sqm for development in the south of the plan area and £200sqm in the north of the plan area. No index linking has been applied to account for inflation over time.  It does not take into account the payment by instalment policy, so in practice there will be a time delay in the CIL money being collected, particularly for larger schemes.  No account has been taken for CIL receipts that might be collected from windfall housing sites, student housing or retail developments, this is because these projects are speculative in nature and as such do not have a timeframe attached to them. Once such projects and their phasing are known they will be included in the CIL spending plan.  It also does not take account of the 5% allowed to be used for administration of the CIL.

4.4 Table 4 in Appendix B shows the housing trajectory for planned housing sites for 6 or more houses on a geographical and parish basis, and identifies how much CIL is likely to be collected in each parish area. The table shows that the CIL is expected to raise approximately £23m over the lifetime of the plan.

4.5 Table 5 in Appendix B shows the estimated amount of CIL to be passed to the City, Town and Parish Councils. The City, Town and Parish Council should use this information to inform their CIL spending priorities. It shows that the Parishes are projected to receive £4,183,536 of the £23,265,360 over the lifetime of the plan.

4.6 Table 7 in Appendix B shows the total potential CIL receipts by geographical sub area by phase, before administrative costs of up to 5% are deducted. This identifies that:  £8,529,840 is available to contribute to the priorities identified during this third IBP period (2018-2023) inclusive of parish proportion or 23

 £7,193,761 without parish proportion

4.7 Table 10 below shows the total cost of short term projects by priority category, which were put forward for CIL funding. This identifies a funding gap which means that the projects need to be prioritised for CIL funding.

Table 10: Total cost of projects by priority category put forward for CIL funding Short Term Medium Term Total of Short & Medium Term (2018-2023) (2023-2029) projects (Local Plan period) Critical Project Costs £0 £0 £0 Essential Project Costs £12,311,000 £7,520,000 £19,831,000 Policy High Project Costs £491,360 £8,798,000 £9,289,360 Desirable Project Costs £2,670,522.20 £1,147,645.15 £3,818,167.35 Total Project Costs £15,472,882.20 £17,465,645.15 £32,938,527.35

Assuming CIL Income* £8,529,840 less £426,492 = £14,735,520 less £736,776 = £23,265,360 less £1,163,268 = This includes the Parish proportion, and includes £8,103,348 £13,998,744 £22,102,092 a 5% deduction for the administration of the CIL. Additional Funding Required to meet shortfall £7,369,534 £3,466,901.15 £10,836,435.35

4.8 The ability to identify appropriate funding sources is therefore essential given the anticipated funding gap. CIL receipts should only be considered as one source that is available to fund infrastructure and not the only tool. Appendix D provides a review of funding sources but the onus must be on individual stakeholders to explore opportunities for cost efficiencies under delivery and/or funding sources that will reduce the call upon CIL Monies.

CIL received since the CIL was implemented on 1February 2016 to date (21 November 2017), and CIL projects delivered.

4.9 Since the implementation of the CIL on 1 February 2016, £2,305,308.62 has been collected to date. Of this amount £115,265.43 (5%) has been allocated for monitoring, and £350,350.64 has been transferred to the parishes to be spent on CIL projects of their choice with a further £82,838.00 to be paid across in April 2018. £38.368.90 has been spent/allocated on projects, leaving the current balance of £1,834,909.65 to be spent on projects.

4.10 Project IBP/533 – the Chichester South Ambulance Community Response Post was the first CIL project to be delivered. £45,000 was allocated to this project in the approved 2016 – 2021 IBP for delivery in 2016. However, it came in under budget at £18,368.90. The balance (£26,631.10) has been rolled forward into year 2017/18 (see table 11 below).

4.11 In addition to IBP/533, the following projects have been delivered, via funding from other sources:  IBP/421 A285- Halnaker Speed limit reduction and traffic calming measures;  IBP/416 footpath, cycleway, bridleway improvements Whyke roundabout A27 – pedestrian/cycle link from Highways England Bridge to link Chichester City with the south of the A27;  IBP/532 Chichester North Ambulance Community Response Post;  IBP/67 Soundproofing of small hall at Fishbourne Centre; 24

 IBP/395 Itchenor Ditch Outfall Flapvalve;  IBP/316 Elevation of footpath to North Hall, Loxwood;  IBP/112 Concrete Skate Park, Selsey;  IBP/393 Development and implementation of the Selsey, Bracklesham and East Wittering Beach Management;  IBP/591 Provision of new footway and dropped kerbs - Malcolm Road junction with Tangmere Road;  IBP/156 Outdoor recreation area, Tangmere;  IBP/146 Skate Park, Tangmere;  IBP/394 West Wittering Flood Banks  IBP/462 Speed limit B2179, Piggery Hall Lane, Witterings.  IBP/292 Hunston Local Drainage, Pelleys Farm.  IBP/376 Green Links across the manhood, Pagham to Medmerry.  IBP/534 Part refurbishment of Chichester police Station.

4.12 Table 11 below shows the projects selected to be funded from Chichester’s proportion of the CIL in this third five year IBP period by year.

25

Table 11: Projects selected for CIL funding from the long list in table 3

2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 1st April b/fwd - 598,294.27 1,718,485.65 1,694,909.65 1,567,209.65 1,591,341.65 1,198,713.65 INCOME Gross Income 775,847.84 1,529,460.79 166,320.00 2,439,000.00 2,048,760.00 1,831,960.00 2,053,800.00 Parish Share 120,392.28 312,796.37 41,580.00 609,750.00 512,190.00 457,990.00 513,450.00 Admin 38,792.39 76,473.04 8,316.00 121,950.00 102,438.00 91,598.00 102,690.00 CDC Net Income 616,663.17 1,140,191.38 116,424.00 1,707,300.00 1,434,132.00 1,282,372.00 1,437,660.00

Funds Available 616,663.17 1,738,485.65 1,834,909.65 3,402,209.65 3,001,341.65 2,873,713.65 2,636,373.65 EXPENDITURE £ £ £ £ £ £ £ Ambulance response Post 18,368.90 Chichester South Project 533 Enhancements to the Lavant 10,000.00 40,000.00 Biodiversity Opportunity Area -the stretch of the Lavant north of the Westhampnett SDL. Project 194 Brandy Hole Copse 10,000.00 Project 196 Local land drainage East 100,000.00 Beach Sea Outfall. Project 293 Primary School places E-W 1,200,000.00 project 330 Chichester (subject to further detail and evaluation) School access improvements 50,000.00 at expanded primary school(s) Chichester. Project 657 Sust trans corridor – City 25,000.00 50,000.00 425,000.00 Centre to Portfield – Oving Rd part of project 656 RTPI screens at Chichester 60,000.00 60,000.00 City Project 355 Westhampnett Rd/St 500,000.00 Pancras/Spitalfields Ln/St James Rd dbl mini rondabouts junction improvements. Project 353 Medical Centre W of 1,300,000.00 Chichester. Project 398 (Subject to further detail and evaluation) Primary School places 1,200,000.00 Bournes. Project 331 (subject to further detail & 26 evaluation)

School access improvements 50,000.00 at expanded primary school(s) Bournes. Project 660 Primary School places 1,200,000.00 Manhood Peninsula. Project 332 (subject to further detail & evaluation School access improvements 50,000.00 at expanded primary school(s) Manhood. Project 659 Total expenditure 18,368.90 20,000.00 140,000.00 1,835,000.00 1,410,000.00 1,675,000.00 1,250,000.00

31st March c/fwd 598,294.27 1,718,485.65 1,694,909.65 1,567,209.65 1,591,341.65 1,198,713.65 1,386,373.65

27

5 Conclusions

Introduction 8.1 This IBP has set out the current understanding of infrastructure required to support the anticipated levels of growth during the second IBP period relating to the Local Plan 2018- 2023. Projects have been summarised by spatial area and project type with a clearly defined approach to project classification and prioritisation.

8.2 This IBP is critical in establishing the agreed focus for spend during the first five years, and provides vital information for all infrastructure providers, to assist their spending plans, as well as providing assurance to the public about what infrastructure will be provided within this period.

The Current Situation 8.3 It has been the purpose of this IBP to capture the current understanding of all infrastructure projects considered necessary to support the delivery of the Chichester Local Plan, and set out an approach to prioritising projects from the full list as candidates for funding support through the Chichester Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), which came into force on 1February 2016. Despite a clear approach to infrastructure prioritisation being set out and an initial attempt to model infrastructure both by level of priority and timeframe for delivery there remains a significant funding gap in the short, medium and long term. This is detailed across chapter 4 which presents the current cash flow and spending plan. Whilst the deficit is not unexpected, future iterations of the IBP will need to scrutinise the cost breakdown of infrastructure projects and their ability to meet the legal tests set out for CIL funding. This will be facilitated by a more refined development trajectory as time progresses as further details of project delivery is known. This greater level of detail will benefit future decision-making as it will show more detail on the candidate projects for funding support, the ways in which the project will be delivered and managed, and any link between CIL funding support and levering in other private/public funding sources.

8.4 This document therefore provides the means to further define and inform the next steps, guiding the approach towards management of CIL receipts across the third five year rolling IBP programme.

8.5 In exceptional circumstances, some projects might be funded from other sources, in advance of sufficient CIL reserves, whilst other projects may have to wait until sufficient CIL reserves have been collected. All CIL receipts will be put into an interest bearing account until they are spent. However, the costs associated with the administration of the CIL (up to 5%) will be drawn upon as needed, and the City, town and parish councils’ portion will be handed over bi-annually in accordance with the CIL regulations.

28

APPENDICES

A Full Project list B CIL Applicable Housing trajectories C Project categorisation process including Implementation, Monitoring & Governance arrangements D Funding Source review E Project proforma F Regulation 123 list G IBP Glossary

29

Appendix A Full Project list by source City, Town & Parish Projects Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Birdham IBP/ Transp Cycle Wheel Major Unknow Unknown S106 & WSCC CIL BI/12/0414 3 Not selected Birdham Parish 2 ort infrastructure Chair/Cycle developments in n CIL 7/OUT; Polic for IBP years Council route to the Bell Lane BI/13/0028 y 2016-2021 Chichester. area requiring 4/FUL High as little Possible more social planned upgrade to facilities for a development Salterns growing village in this cycle. Way and population. Canal. Birdham IBP/ Transp Local road Traffic Major Unknow Unknown S106 & WSCC CIL BI/12/0414 2 Not selected Birdham Parish 1 ort network calming of developments in n CIL 7/OUT; Esse for IBP years Council the A286 the Bell Lane BI/13/0028 ntial 2016-2021 together area requiring 4/FUL as little with safe pedestrian planned methods of movements in development improving crossing Bell in this cycle. pedestrian Lane for schools safety either and shopping via pedestrian crossing or bridging the A286 and Bell Lane Birdham IBP/ Green Allotments Turn land Parish Duty to Unknow Unknown S106 & Birdham CIL 4 Not selected Birdham Parish 3 Infrastr bequest into provide if n CIL Parish Desir for IBP years Council ucture allotments requested Council able 2016-2021 as little planned development in this cycle. Birdham IBP/ Green Landscaping Extending & Major Unknow Approx. S106 & Birdham CIL BI/12/0414 4 Not selected Birdham Parish 6 Infrastr , planting Improving developments n £40k CIL Parish 7/OUT; Desir for IBP years Council ucture and the Village throughout the Council BI/13/0028 able 2016-2021 woodland Pond village requiring 4/FUL as little creation and that surface planned public rights water is drained development of way as quickly as in this cycle. possible to prevent flooding Birdham IBP/ Green Landscaping Providing Increase in Unknow Unknown S106 & Birdham CIL BI/12/0414 4 Not selected Birdham Parish 7 Infrastr , planting hedging & village n CIL Parish 7/OUT; Desir for IBP years Council ucture and trees along population which Council BI/13/0028 able 2016-2021 woodland the western would demand 4/FUL as little creation and edge of the greater use of planned public rights playing field the playing field development of way to improve with a resultant in this cycle. safety and impact on wild provide wild life life corridor 30

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Birdham IBP/ Green Landscaping Repairs to Other 4 Not selected Birdham Parish 188 Infrastr , planting Canal Locks Desir for IBP years Council ucture and able 2016-2021 woodland as little creation and planned public rights development of way in this cycle. Birdham IBP/ Green Playing Draining the Major Unknow Unknown S106 & Birdham CIL BI/07/0564 4 Not selected Birdham Parish 4 Infrastr fields, sports Playing field developments in n CIL Parish 0/FUL; Desir for IBP years Council ucture pitches, and the Bell Lane Council BI/12/0414 able 2016-2021 related build providing area requiring 7/OUT as little and Changing more social planned children's Facilities facilities for a development play areas growing village in this cycle. population. Birdham IBP/ Green Playing Refurbish Major Unknow Unknown S106 & Birdham CIL BI/12/0414 4 Not selected Birdham Parish 5 Infrastr fields, sports the developments in n CIL Parish 7/OUT; Desir for IBP years Council ucture pitches, Children's the Bell Lane Council BI/13/0028 able 2016-2021 related build play area area requiring 4/FUL as little and and provide more social planned children's a wider facilities for a development play areas range of growing village in this cycle. activities for population. a growing population Bosham IBP/ Transp Car parking Broadbridge Provide £40,000 WSCC/CD Bosham CIL 4 Not selected Bosham Parish 20 ort parking adequate C, CIL/PC, Parish Desir for IBP years Council bays parking facilities CIL Council, able 2016-2021 off verges WSCC as little planned development in this cycle. Bosham IBP/ Transp Car parking Harbour Car Tourism friendly £100,000 CDC Bosham Other 4 Not selected Bosham Parish 11 ort Park (revenue Parish Desir for IBP years Council from Car Council, able 2016-2021 Park) CDC as little planned development in this cycle. Bosham IBP/ Transp Cycle and Improve Sustainable SusTrans/ WSCC, CIL 4 Not selected Bosham Parish 18 ort pedestrian provision of modes of WSCC/Big Adjacent Desir for IBP years Council infrastructure cycle/footpa transport Society Parishes able 2016-2021 ths to funds as little include planned Taylors development Lane in this cycle. Extension of footpath Bosham IBP/ Transp Local road 20mph Safety as £10,000 WSCC/CiL WSCC, CIL 4 Not selected Bosham Parish 16 ort network Village expressed in Bosham Desir for IBP years Council T&P Strategy Parish able 2016-2021 adopted in Council as little January 2015 planned development 31

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory in this cycle. Bosham IBP/ Transp Local road Pinch Safety as £100,000 WSCC/CiL Bosham CIL 4 Not selected Bosham Parish 15 ort network Points in expressed in Parish Desir for IBP years Council Delling T&P Strategy Council, able 2016-2021 Lane, adopted in WSCC as little Taylors January 2015 planned Lane & development Walton in this cycle. Lane Bosham IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Walton Safety/ Safe £700,000 WSCC/CD WSCC CIL 4 Not selected Bosham Parish 9 ort infrastructure Lane routes to school C, CIL Desir for IBP years Council Footpath able 2016-2021 as little planned development in this cycle. Bosham IBP/ Transp Pedestrian A259 Safety/ Safe £50,000 CDC/WSC WSCC CIL 4 Not selected Bosham Parish 10 ort infrastructure Pelican routes to school C/SusTran Desir for IBP years Council Crossing s/CiL able 2016-2021 as little planned development in this cycle. Bosham IBP/ Social Community Village Hall Ongoing £100,000 CDC/PC, Bosham CIL 4 Not selected Bosham Parish 21 Infrastr facilities provision maintenance/ CIL/New Parish Desir for IBP years Council ucture improvements/re Homes Council able 2016-2021 furbishment as little planned development in this cycle. Bosham IBP/ Social Streetscene High Street Safety & £100,000 WSCC/CD Bosham Other 4 Not selected Bosham Parish 12 Infrastr and built Improveme Tourism – C/Cil/HLF Parish Desir for IBP years Council ucture environment nt Shared surfaces & Council, able 2016-2021 Townscap WSCC as little e Heritage planned Imitative development in this cycle. Bosham IBP/ Green Flood and Wastewater Current system Flood risk Flood risk Other 3 Not selected Bosham Parish 14 Infrastr coastal & Harbour compromised in managem manageme Polic for IBP years Council ucture erosion risk drains wet weather ent nt y 2016-2021 management authorities. authorities. High as little planned development in this cycle. Bosham IBP/ Green Playing Relocate Football safety £100,00 CiL/Sport Bosham CIL BI/13/0028 4 Not selected Bosham Parish 13 Infrastr fields, sports Football standards England/N Parish 4/FUL Desir for IBP years Council ucture pitches, Pitch avoiding shared ational Council, able 2016-2021 related build use with school playing WSCC as little and and public fields planned children's Associatio development play areas n in this cycle. Bosham IBP/ Green Public open Recreation Extend & Developer Bosham CIL 3 Not selected Bosham Parish 17 Infrastr space space improve green s/CDC Parish Polic for IBP years 32

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Council ucture recreational CiL/PC CiL Council, y 2016-2021 spaces for CDC High as little sustainable planned living development in this cycle. Boxgrove IBP/ Transp The Street Improve 4 Boxgrov Parish 420 ort near the crossing point Desir e Council community on – high level able centre - of use by school SRTS children and improvemen concerns with ts? visibility Boxgrove IBP/ Transp Local road Traffic Identified in the WSCC CIL 4 Parish may Boxgrov Parish 649 ort network calming at Neighbourhood Desir wish to e Council Halnaker Plan. able consider crossroads. funding from their CIL Chicheste IBP/ Transp Cycle Improved To improve safe 2019 Short CIL/S106 WSCC & CIL 3 City Council Chichest r City 25 ort infrastructure Cycle Ways access for term CDC Polic may wish to er City Council around City cyclists. (201 y consider 6- High funding from 2023 their CIL ) Chicheste IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Bus shelters Provision of 2017 Short City CIL 4 City Council Chichest r City 708 ort infrastructure additional bus term Council Desir may wish to er City Council shelters within (201 able consider the City to meet 6- funding from demand from 2023 their CIL local residents. ) Chicheste IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Provision Improve access 2019 Short CIL WSCC & CIL 4 City Council Chichest r City 24 ort infrastructure for slow for elderly term CDC/Com Desir may wish to er City Council moving people in City (201 mercial able consider electric Centre. 6- provider. funding from vehicles for 2023 their CIL the elderly. ) Chicheste IBP/ Transp Pedestrian A complete Over 40 years 2019 Short CIL & CDC, CIL 4 City Council Chichest r City 22 ort infrastructure resurfacing old and very term S106 WSCC & Desir may wish to er City Council of the uneven, better (201 City Centre able consider existing HGV/pavement 6- BID. funding from pedestrian definition. 2023 their CIL precinct. Increased ) Widening of pedestrian flows the anticipated from footpaths in increased key streets population. approaching Refer to Public the Realm and pedestrian Accessibility area (e.g. Enhancement North Street Strategy and South September 2005 Street) to achieve improved 33

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory public. A general improvemen t in the signage, streetscape, street furniture and green open spaces to improve the visitor experience to the City Chicheste IBP/ Social Streetscene Improve 2017- Short £20,000 Chichester CIL 4 Chichest r City 712 Infrastr and built City 2018 term City Desir er City Council ucture environment signage. (201 Council able 6- 2023 ) Chidham IBP/ Transp Car parking Identify WSCC CIL 4 Chidha and 604 ort areas for Desir m and Hambrook and provide able Hambro Parish unobtrusive ok Council parking for visitors , resurface layby opposite The Barleycorn for visitors’ use Chidham IBP/ Transp Car parking Improve Improve parking WSCC CIL 4 Chidha and 603 ort residents’ Desir m and Hambrook parking in able Hambro Parish the ok Council following areas: East side of Chidham Lane to the Meadow, both sides of Broad Road by Broad Meadow, outside Mansfield Cottages, bottom of Cot Lane 34

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Chidham IBP/ Transp Cycle Provision of Support the WSCC CIL 4 Chidha and 600 ort infrastructure dedicated Chemroute Desir m and Hambrook cycle route campaign able Hambro Parish the whole ok Council length of the Parish Chidham IBP/ Transp Local road Reduce Speed reduction WSCC CIL 4 Chidha and 599 ort network speed limit Desir m and Hambrook on the able Hambro Parish Bosham ok Council straight from 60mph to 50 mph Chidham IBP/ Transp Local road Speed Speed reduction WSCC CIL 4 Chidha and 598 ort network restrictions Desir m and Hambrook of 30mph able Hambro Parish on the ok Council peninsula and along the A259 through the Parish Chidham IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Resurface improve walking WSCC CIL 4 Chidha and 601 ort infrastructure /improve and pavement Desir m and Hambrook walking and route able Hambro Parish pavement ok Council routes : Chidham Lane, Broad Road , Main Road from Chidham Lane to Cot Lane and Drift Lane to Broad Road Chidham IBP/ Transp Pedestrian School Pedestrian Other 4 Chidha and 508 ort infrastructure Safety Zone Safety Desir m and Hambrook and Safer able Hambro Parish Routes to ok Council School Scheme - Chidham Parochial Primary School, Chidham Lane Chidham IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Provision of Safety WSCC CIL 4 Chidha and 602 ort infrastructure pavement Desir m and Hambrook on West able Hambro Parish side of ok Council Broad Road from Post 35

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Office to Children’s Play Area Chidham IBP/ Educati Primary, Work to Support the WSCC CIL 4 Chidha and 605 on Secondary, sustain school to keep Desir m and Hambrook sixth form Chidham the admission able Hambro Parish and special Parochial numbers ok Council educational Primary manageable and needs School to increase the accommoda percentage te attending from expanding catchment capacity Chidham IBP/ Social Community Create a Parish CIL 4 Chidha and 612 Infrastr facilities Community Council Desir m and Hambrook ucture Recreation able Hambro Parish Centre with ok Council outdoor facilities for all ages Chidham IBP/ Social Community Maximum Parish CIL 4 Chidha and 611 Infrastr facilities refurbishme Council Desir m and Hambrook ucture nt of the able Hambro Parish Chidham ok Council and Hambrook Village Hall Chidham IBP/ Social Community Improveme To enable them Short £57,368 St Wilfrid's S106 4 Chidha and 713 Infrastr facilities nts to St to continue to term PCC Desir m and Hambrook ucture Wilfrid's support the (201 able Hambro Parish Church Hall. community. 6- ok Council 2023 ) Chidham IBP/ Social Streetscene Improve Parish CIL 4 Chidha and 616 Infrastr and built signage to Council Desir m and Hambrook ucture environment Parish able Hambro Parish amenities ok Council Chidham IBP/ Social Streetscene Reduce For the amenity Chidham CIL 4 Chidha and 699 Infrastr and built light of residents and and Desir m and Hambrook ucture environment pollution visitors. Hambrook able Hambro Parish where PC ok Council possible (Maybush Copse) Chidham IBP/ Green Public open The Dell ( Parish CIL 4 Chidha and 614 Infrastr space Chidham Council Desir m and Hambrook ucture Lane) to be able Hambro Parish maintained ok Council to a satisfactory level Chidham IBP/ Utility Utility Install WiFi Parish CIL 4 Chidha 36

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory and 624 Service services to the Council Desir m and Hambrook s Village Hall able Hambro Parish ok Council Chidham IBP/ Public Cemetery St Mary's Existing £9,240 Chidham CIL 4 Chidha and 709 and Church extension and Desir m and Hambrook Comm Graveyard, graveyard will Hambrook able Hambro Parish unity Cot Lane, be full in 18-24 PC ok Council Service Chidham. months time. s Looking to extend graveyard. Local farmer willing to donate land adjacent to main churchyard. Donningto IBP/ Transp Cycle and Canal Necessary to CIL 4 Parish may Donning n Parish 650 ort pedestrian towpath ensure an Desir wish to ton Council infrastructure surface adequate able consider improvemen walking surface funding from ts between for the their CIL Canal Walk increasing and numbers of Waterside pedestrians Drive and living and the commenting underpass. through Donnington. Donningto IBP/ Transp Cycle Cycle Extend through On- Short CIL 3 Parish may Donning n Parish 42 ort infrastructure network Parish going term Polic wish to ton Council (201 y consider 6- High funding from 2023 their CIL ) Donningto IBP/ Transp Local road Air quality To record levels CIL 4 Parish may Donning n Parish 36 ort network monitor in of air pollution in Desir wish to ton Council Donnington the Parish to able consider better funding from understand the their CIL potential impact of additional vehicles on the health of residents. Donningto IBP/ Health Community Medical There is no CIL 4 Parish may Donning n Parish 38 healthcare, Centre surgery or Desir wish to ton Council primary care including pharmacy in able consider facilities & pharmacy Donnington and funding from improvement residents must their CIL s travel into the City for these 37

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory services. A surgery in Donnington could also service the increasing population on the Manhood Peninsula and free up spaces in City surgeries where increased p Donningto IBP/ Social Community Village Hall Improved On Short S106 4 Parish may Donning n Parish 43 Infrastr facilities extension community use approval term Desir wish to ton Council ucture of (201 able consider planning 6- funding from permissi 2023 their CIL on ) Donningto IBP/ Social Community Improveme The hall is over CIL 4 Parish may Donning n Parish 35 Infrastr facilities nts and subscribed and Desir wish to ton Council ucture additional needs more able consider equipment rooms/spaces. funding from for village Additional their CIL hall equipment would open the hall up to wider use amongst the community e.g. families/young people. Donningto IBP/ Green Playing Additional Encourage more Other 4 Parish may Donning n Parish 34 Infrastr fields, sports signage for visitors to Desir wish to ton Council ucture pitches, playing field existing facilities able consider related build funding from and their CIL children's play areas Donningto IBP/ Green Playing Additional New housing CIL 4 Parish may Donning n Parish 33 Infrastr fields, sports equipment has brought Desir wish to ton Council ucture pitches, for playing families to the able consider related build fields area. Older funding from and children are not their CIL children's as well catered play areas for by existing facilities Earnley IBP/ Transp Local road Village To reduce 2016- Short £5,000 CIL Earnley CIL 4 Earnley Parish 685 ort network Gateways speeding 2021 term Parish Desir Council through parish (201 Council able and in particular 6- in the 2 2023 conservation ) areas as per recommended in 38

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Conservation Area Appraisal. Earnley IBP/ Social Community Village Following the 2016- Short £100,000 CIL/New Earnley CIL 4 Earnley Parish 684 Infrastr facilities meeting loss of Earnley 2021 term Homes Parish Desir Council ucture room and Concourse there (201 Bonus and Council able office is no community 6- precept space. meeting 2023 facilities. ) Earnley IBP/ Green Public open Village To provide 2016- Short £10,000 CIL, New Earnley CIL 4 Earnley Parish 686 Infrastr space Green central focal 2021 term Homes Parish Desir Council ucture point for the (201 Bonus & Council able Parish to enable 6- precept community 2023 events. ) East IBP/ Transp Car parking Increase Insufficient 4 Not selected East Wittering 44 ort parking in provision means Desir for IBP years Wittering & East parking is a able 2016-2021 and Bracklesh Wittering & major issue for as little Brackles am Parish Bracklesha the smaller planned ham Council m shopping centre development in Bracklehsam in this cycle. and the larger centre in East Wittering. Plus the area is a significant tourist destination making parking more difficult during April- September. East IBP/ Transp Public Extend bus Residents 4 Not selected East Wittering 45 ort transport service to without cars Desir for IBP years Wittering & include later (including young able 2016-2021 and Bracklesh evenings. people) cannot as little Brackles am Parish access the planned ham Council services or development employment - in in this cycle. particular shift workers, entertainment and leisure facilities - which are in Chichester during the evening as the bus stops its service fairly early. East IBP/ Educati Youth Improve WSCC has 4 Not selected East Wittering 47 on provision Youth Club failed to provide Desir for IBP years Wittering & facilities. an acceptable able 2016-2021 and Bracklesh lease for the as little Brackles 39

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory am Parish existing youth planned ham Council club facilities. development Therefore club in this cycle. now has no premises and is looking for alternatives. East IBP/ Health Community Satellite More housing is 4 Not selected East Wittering 46 healthcare, doctors being built in Desir for IBP years Wittering & primary care surgery in Bracklesham able 2016-2021 and Bracklesh facilities & Bracklesha than East as little Brackles am Parish improvement m. Wittering and planned ham Council s the elderly and development infirm would in this cycle. have easier access to medical facilities if there was provision in Bracklesham. East Wittering is a bus or car ride away for this sector of the community East IBP/ Social Streetscene The street 4 Not selected East Wittering 52 Infrastr and built scene and Desir for IBP years Wittering & ucture environment layout of able 2016-2021 and Bracklesh both East as little Brackles am Parish Wittering planned ham Council and development Bracklesha in this cycle. m needs improvemen t East IBP/ Social Streetscene In E. These are old, 4 Not selected East Wittering 53 Infrastr and built Wittering rusty and poorly Desir for IBP years Wittering & ucture environment the steps maintained. The able 2016-2021 and Bracklesh and retraining wall is as little Brackles am Parish handrails, cracked and planned ham Council retaining leaning over development wall and towards the in this cycle. pathways road. The street need scene is in need refurbishing. of work. This appearance is detrimental to our visitor experience. East IBP/ Social Streetscene The To improve 4 Not selected East Wittering 54 Infrastr and built seafront at visitor Desir for IBP years Wittering & ucture environment both E. experience. able 2016-2021 and Bracklesh Wittering as little Brackles am Parish and planned ham 40

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Council Bracklesha development m need in this cycle. enhancing East IBP/ Utility Utility Mobile The villages are 4 Not selected East Wittering 51 Service services phone poorly served by Desir for IBP years Wittering & s coverage most service able 2016-2021 and Bracklesh improvemen providers. as little Brackles am Parish t planned ham Council development in this cycle. East IBP/ Utility Utility Sewage To support new 4 Not selected East Wittering 50 Service services system development Desir for IBP years Wittering & s improvemen and ensure that able 2016-2021 and Bracklesh ts. the risk of as little Brackles am Parish flooding to planned ham Council existing development properties is not in this cycle. unacceptably increased. Fishbourn IBP/ Transp Cycle and Safety Used a lot in the Delay Depends CIL SAS CIL 4 Parish may Fishbour e Parish 70 ort pedestrian issue: dark so low level until on extent Desir wish to ne Council infrastructure Lighting lighting would decision left unlit able consider along decrease risk of is funding from Emperor attack reached their CIL Way by SAS on building site to raise essential income. Fishbourn IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Footpath To provide safer By Short £10,000 NHB (?) FPFA via CIL 4 Parish may Fishbour e Parish 68 ort infrastructure southwards access to Pre- Septem term (approx) FPC Desir wish to ne Council from school, ber 2016 (201 able consider Fishbourne Children’s Play 6- funding from Centre Area and 2023 their CIL parallel with Fishbourne ) Blackboy Centre Lane. There is a need for a bridge over the ditch. Fishbourn IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Safety Importance of Septem Short WSCC (?) Fishbourne CIL 4 Parish may Fishbour e Parish 69 ort infrastructure issue: protecting the ber 2019 term Parish Desir wish to ne Council Lighting of young (201 Council able consider footpath 6- funding from southwards 2023 their CIL from ) Fishbourne Centre parallel with Blackboy Lane 41

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Fishbourn IBP/ Transp Public Bus shelters Fishbourne 2019 Short £5,000 Possible % Fishbourne Other FB/09/024 4 Parish may Fishbour e Parish 57 ort transport throughout Neighbourhood term grant from Parish 31/OUT Desir wish to ne Council the village Plan Priority (201 WSCC + Council able consider 6- sec.106? funding from 2023 their CIL ) Fishbourn IBP/ Health Community Provision of Priority in Unlikely ? CIL 4 Parish may Fishbour e Parish 60 healthcare, medical previous village Desir wish to ne Council primary care facilities plans and in able consider facilities & even if just FNP but no funding from improvement nurse-led interest from their CIL s clinic local doctors’ surgeries Fishbourn IBP/ Green Allotments Allotments Very low No Certainly - CIL 4 Parish may Fishbour e Parish 65 Infrastr ranking. No action at nil in the Desir wish to ne Council ucture suitable site least in short term able consider available short funding from term. their CIL Possibilit y of some land for Commu nity use owned by WSCC but with no access as yet) Kirdford IBP/ Transp Cycle and Improve Parish-wide 2015- Short CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford Parish 80 ort pedestrian local 2029 term Desir wish to Council infrastructure footpaths, (201 able consider cycle tracks 6- funding from and 2023 their CIL equestrian ) ways Kirdford IBP/ Transp Local road Highway Townfield/Cornw 2015- Short CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford Parish 77 ort network alterations, ood 2020 term Desir wish to Council parking (201 able consider provision 6- funding from and 2023 their CIL landscaping ) Kirdford IBP/ Transp Local road Highway Cornwood to 2015- Short CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford Parish 76 ort network alterations enable 2021, term Desir wish to Council development for sequenti (201 able consider young/elderly al with 6- funding from housing GI 2023 their CIL projects ) Kirdford IBP/ Transp Pedestrian New Development 2015- Short CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford Parish 79 ort infrastructure footpaths & Site North of 2029 term Desir wish to Council Community Village (201 able consider Amenity 6- funding from 42

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Space 2023 their CIL ) Kirdford IBP/ Transp Public Bus on 2015 Short CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford Parish 75 ort transport demand term Desir wish to Council (201 able consider 6- funding from 2023 their CIL ) Kirdford IBP/ Educati Primary, Provision of Cross Plan area 2015 Short CIL 2 Consider Kirdford Parish 78 on Secondary, additional (north parishes) term Esse selecting if Council sixth form Primary (201 ntial match and special School 6- funding is educational Places 2023 identified as needs ) this project supports the growth of the area provided it is for genuine community use. Kirdford IBP/ Social Community Community To increase cafe 2015- Short CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford Parish 83 Infrastr facilities Stores - area and 2018 term Desir wish to Council ucture Extension to storage (201 able consider Building and provision and 6- funding from Parking enhancing the 2023 their CIL external picnic ) area and parking Kirdford IBP/ Green Allotments Community On site east of 2017- Short CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford Parish 85 Infrastr allotments Bramley Close. 2018 3-5 term Desir wish to Council ucture and/or farm years (201 able consider with orchard 6- funding from and 2023 their CIL appropriate ) storage facilities and parking Kirdford IBP/ Green Playing Play area 2016- Short Parish/HAS CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford Parish 86 Infrastr fields, sports off School 2017 2-4 term Desir wish to Council ucture pitches, Court years (201 able consider related build 6- funding from and 2023 their CIL children's ) play areas Kirdford IBP/ Green Public open New Road, Butts Common 2015- Short CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford Parish 81 Infrastr space Parking 2020 term Desir wish to Council ucture area and (201 able consider SUDS pond 6- funding from and play 2023 their CIL area ) Kirdford IBP/ Green Public open Village 2016- Short Parish CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford Parish 87 Infrastr space Green - 2017 2-5 term Desir wish to 43

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Council ucture Butts years (201 able consider Common 6- funding from 2023 their CIL ) Lavant IBP/ Transp Local road Important Continuing As soon Short As yet As yet Lavant CIL 4 Not selected Lavant Parish 89 ort network traffic problems with as term unknown unknown Parish Desir for IBP years Council calming fast traffic and possible (201 Council able 2016-2021 measures complaints from 6- as little within the residents 2023 planned village ) development in this cycle. Lavant IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Footpath CIL 4 Parish may Lavant Parish 585 ort infrastructure maintenanc Desir wish to Council e able consider funding from their CIL Lavant IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Either Improved safety Short WSCC CIL 4 Parish may Lavant Parish 643 ort infrastructure extension to at Lavant term Desir wish to Council pavement Primary School. (201 able consider so children (Parents have to 6- funding from can get to park on road 2023 their CIL and from and walk ) school or children to provision of school, there is layby and no pavement pavement to beyond the enable allotments) children to get to and from school or a car park for parents to drop off and pick up children from school. Lavant IBP/ Educati Early years A pre- CIL 4 Parish may Lavant Parish 584 on and school Desir wish to Council childcare able consider funding from their CIL Lavant IBP/ Educati Early years Provision of Short CIL 4 Parish may Lavant Parish 644 on and pre-school term Desir wish to Council childcare (201 able consider 6- funding from 2023 their CIL ) Lavant IBP/ Educati Primary, Expansion More school As yet As yet Primary CIL Not selected Lavant Parish 88 on Secondary, of local places are unknown unknown school/pari for IBP years Council sixth form primary required sh council 2016-2021 and special school with as little educational associated planned needs parking development 44

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory in this cycle. Lavant IBP/ Social Community Provision of Nowhere for Parish CIL 4 Parish may Lavant Parish 646 Infrastr facilities youth youth to meet Council Desir wish to Council ucture shelter able consider funding from their CIL Lavant IBP/ Social Community Provision of Volunteers have Parish CIL 4 Parish may Lavant Parish 645 Infrastr facilities storage of equipment but Council Desir wish to Council ucture equipment nowhere to store able consider to it. funding from undertake their CIL community projects such as path maintenanc e and construction . Lavant IBP/ Social Community A new It has been Parish CIL 4 Parish may Lavant Parish 648 Infrastr facilities community identified in the Council Desir wish to Council ucture hub/shop Neighbourhood able consider within St Plan as a funding from Nicholas possible place their CIL Church. for this. Lavant IBP/ Green Flood and Maintenanc To keep ditches Lavant CIL 4 Lavant Parish 595 Infrastr coastal e of ditches clear to prevent Parish Desir Council ucture erosion risk flooding. Council able management Lavant IBP/ Green Playing A new play Existing area the Parish CIL 4 Parish may Lavant Parish 647 Infrastr fields, sports area equipment is Council Desir wish to Council ucture pitches, dilapidated. able consider related build funding from and their CIL children's play areas Lavant IBP/ Green Playing Maintenanc Health and Lavant CIL 4 Lavant Parish 594 Infrastr fields, sports e of safety and to Parish Desir Council ucture pitches, playgrounds increase use. Council able related build and children's play areas Loxwood IBP/ Transp Car parking To increase Increased 2017- Short £12,000 North Hall CIL LX/13/020 4 Loxwoo Parish 317 ort car park numbers using 2018 term Trustees 25/FUL Desir d Council capacity North Hall put (201 able (Loxwood) pressure on 6- parking. This 2023 could be ) alleviated by introducing car park to south of entrance drive. 45

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Loxwood IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Pedestrian Increase footfall 2017- Short £200,000 Communit Loxwood CIL 4 Parish 696 ort infrastructure crossing across the road 2019 term y Parish Desir Council B2133 in particular (201 Highways Council able Loxwood children 6- Funding Nursery site crossing from 2023 new ) development to get to school and in the other direction and in the other direction, residents crossing to the new village stores. Loxwood IBP/ Transp Transport To improve The entrance is 2017- Short 10,000 North Hall CIL 4 Loxwoo Parish 571 ort vehicular on the inside of 2018 term Trustees Desir d Council access to a bend in the (201 able North Hall B2133 with 6- difficult access. 2023 A wider, well ) signed drive with enhanced sight- lines is required. Loxwood IBP/ Transp Transport VAS poles The NP commits 2017- Short £1,500 Loxwood CIL 4 Loxwoo Parish 697 ort to traffic 2018 term PC Desir d Council coalmining (201 able along the 6- B2133. VAS are 2023 to be purchased ) and they require supporting poles. Loxwood IBP/ Social Community Extension to An increasing 2015/20 Short 50,000 North Hall CIL 4 Loxwoo Parish 573 Infrastr facilities storage number of North 16 term Trustees Desir d Council ucture facility. Hall regular (201 able (weekly) users 6- have used all of 2023 the available ) storage space. Various options to increase space are being considered. Loxwood IBP/ Social Community Enlargemen Increased 2017- Short £4,000 North Hall CIL 4 Loxwoo Parish 572 Infrastr facilities t of men’s numbers using 2018 term Trustees Desir d Council ucture toilet in North Hall puts (201 able North Hall the men’s toilet 6- under pressure. 2023 Removal of ) redundant water heater and addition of two 46

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory more urinals would solve the problem. Loxwood IBP/ Green Playing Resurfacing The playground 2018- Short £20,000 Loxwood CIL 4 Loxwoo Parish 698 Infrastr fields, sports of North surface is 2019 term Parish Desir d Council ucture pitches, Hall messed grass (201 Council able related build playground and has suffered 6- and from subsidence 2023 children's and areas of ) play areas erosion. Lynchmer IBP/ Social Community Renovation Increase in When Short £60,000 Communit Parish Other 4 Not selected Lynchm e Parish 569 Infrastr facilities s to St. community funds term y Council Desir for IBP years ere Council ucture Michael’s activity groups available (201 fundraising able 2016-2021 Hall & more community (within 6- & grants. as little Hardman space for local next 12- 2023 planned Hoyle use required. 18 ) development Memorial months) in this cycle. Hall Linchmere Road Lynchmer IBP/ Social Community Purchase of Hall being sold Within Short £50,000 £50,000 Parish Other 4 Not selected Lynchm e Parish 568 Infrastr facilities St. and is needed to the next term from Council Desir for IBP years ere Council ucture Michael’s supplement lack 6 (201 Parish able 2016-2021 Hall, of community months 6- Council, or as little Linchmere facilities for 2023 from planned Road numerous local ) community development groups/activities fundraising in this cycle. . Lynchmer IBP/ Green Playing Rebuilding Existing pavilion Over the Short £180,000 £30,000 Parish Other 4 Not selected Lynchm e Parish 567 Infrastr fields, sports of is outdated, next 24 term (ex vat) from New Council Desir for IBP years ere Council ucture pitches, Camelsdale newer larger months (201 Homes able 2016-2021 related build pavilion, facilities are 6- Bonus as little and needed to meet 2023 ((CDC). planned children's modern ) £35,000 development play areas requirements from in this cycle. and Parish accommodate Council the hugely reserves. increased Remaining community, & £115,00 sport based use. hoped to come from sport & lottery grants North IBP/ Transp Cycle and Footpath/cy Would enable Needed Short £110,000 S106, CIL WSCC CIL 2 Not selected North Mundham 91 ort pedestrian cleway local residents now, but term for portion and other Highways Esse for IBP years Mundha Parish infrastructure along to avoid using a should (201 between sources ntial 2016-2021 m Council B2166 from car for short integrate 6- Runcton supporting as little Runcton to journeys, and with 2023 and farm sustainabl planned farm shop – would facilitate develop ) shop e transport development and sustainable ment of in this cycle. perhaps transport links other onwards to (cycleways) transport 47

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory parish between links boundary to Bognor, link with Pagham and footpaths/cy Chichester. PC cleways could carry out from Bognor work under and licence. PC to Pagham manage scheme within Parish boundary. North IBP/ Green Biodiversity Develop Improves Site Short Variable – CIL, New North CIL 3 Not selected North Mundham 95 Infrastr measures route of landscape and available term can be Homes Mundham Polic for IBP years Mundha Parish ucture disused provides now (201 funded on Bonus, Parish y 2016-2021 m Council canal as environmental 6- progressiv local self- Council High as little green benefits for local 2023 e basis as help planned infrastructur population ) work development e and proceeds in this cycle. wildlife haven to encourage biodiversity North IBP/ Green Playing Outdoor Provides health Site Short £20,000 - New North CIL 4 Not selected North Mundham 93 Infrastr fields, sports gym/exercis and leisure could be term £30,000 Homes Mundham Desir for IBP years Mundha Parish ucture pitches, e equipment benefits for local made (201 (estimate) Bonus Parish able 2016-2021 m Council related build – to be sited community. No available 6- Council or as little and on playing comparable in short 2023 Playing planned children's fields facility exists in term ) Fields Trust development play areas the parish in this cycle. North IBP/ Green Playing Safe Provides health Site Short £10,000 CIL or Playing CIL 4 Not selected North Mundham 94 Infrastr fields, sports surface for and leisure available term New Fields Trust Desir for IBP years Mundha Parish ucture pitches, Children’s benefits for local now (201 Homes able 2016-2021 m Council related build Play Area community. 6- Bonus as little and Mitigates safety 2023 planned children's and upkeep ) development play areas problems of in this cycle. present mix of grass and resilient surfacing Oving IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Footpaths, Maintenance no CIL Oving Parish 634 ort infrastructure bridle paths longer carried Council and local out by WSCC. roads Oving IBP/ Transp Public Public bus S106 O/11/0528 Oving Parish 633 ort transport improvemen 3/OUT Council ts and provision of minibus to access city. Oving IBP/ Educati Early years Pre-school Short S106 O/11/0528 4 Oving Parish 631 on and facilities term 3/OUT Desir Council childcare (201 able 6- 2023 48

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory ) Oving IBP/ Educati Primary, Schools/coll Essential ASAP Short Unknown County & Governmen CIL 4 Details of Oving Parish 99 on Secondary, eges term Governme t Desir project Council sixth form (201 nt able insufficient and special 6- educational 2023 needs ) Oving IBP/ Health Community Hospital & Essential Now Short Unknown County NHS CIL 4 Not selected Oving Parish 98 healthcare, doctors term funds Desir for IBP years Council primary care surgeries (201 able 2016-2021 facilities & 6- as little improvement 2023 planned s ) development in this cycle. Oving IBP/ Social Community Community Essential Ongoing Short Unknown Parish & Many CIL 4 Not selected Oving Parish 101 Infrastr facilities Facilities term City Desir for IBP years Council ucture (201 Councils able 2016-2021 6- (CIL) as little 2023 planned ) development in this cycle. Oving IBP/ Social Community Indoor and Essential to S106 O/11/0528 Oving Parish 632 Infrastr facilities outdoor meet demand 3/OUT Council ucture sports/recre from planned ation developments. facilities. Oving IBP/ Green Flood and Flood Essential ASAP Short Unknown County, Environme CIL 3 Not selected Oving Parish 100 Infrastr coastal control term Govt, nt Agency Polic for IBP years Council ucture erosion risk (201 Utility y 2016-2021 management 6- Companie High as little 2023 s planned ) development in this cycle. Oving IBP/ Utility Utility Chichester Critical to all 2018 - Short £90 Governme Highways S106 1 Committed Oving Parish 96 Service services Bypass CDC 2019 term million nt England Critic Council s Improveme developments (201 al nts 6- 2023 ) Oving IBP/ Utility Utility Sewerage Essential to ASAP Short Unknown Southern Southern Other 1 Committed Oving Parish 97 Service services (pipes) need demand term Water Water Critic Council s waste water from planned (201 al treatment developments 6- (Tangmere 2023 WWTW) ) Selsey IBP/ Transp Cycle B2145 Only transport 2015 Short 300,000 (Grants as STC/WSC CIL 3 Consider Selsey Town 104 ort infrastructure Improveme link to Town (to term (£200,000 and when C (WSCC Polic selecting if Council nts – introduce a safer (201 per available) & Sustrans) y match Commuting environment for 6- kilometre) High funding is cycle path cyclists) 2023 identified as to ) this project Chichester/ supports the Pagham growth of the 49

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory (Selsey to area Chichester provided it is following for genuine route off community B2145 but use. off road) Selsey IBP/ Transp Local road B2145 Only transport 2015 Short Selsey CIL 4 Not selected Selsey Town 102 ort network Improveme link to Town (to term Town Desir for IBP years Council nts – Bus improve traffic (201 Council, able 2016-2021 and Tractor flow) 6- WSCC as little Pull off 2023 planned points ) development in this cycle. Selsey IBP/ Transp Local road B2145 Only transport 2015 Short STC/WSC CIL 3 Not selected Selsey Town 103 ort network Improveme link to Town (to term C (WSCC Polic for IBP years Council nts – Ferry improve traffic (201 & y 2016-2021 Bend flow) 6- Developer) High as little improvemen 2023 planned ts ) development in this cycle. Selsey IBP/ Transp Smarter Community To assist with £100,000 Selsey CIL 3 Not selected Selsey Town 106 ort Choices and car club access to Town Polic for IBP years Council promote Chichester Council y 2016-2021 sustainable based services. High as little modes of planned transport development in this cycle. Selsey IBP/ Educati Primary, Provision of Lack of current STC, 4 Not selected Selsey Town 121 on Secondary, post-16 facility and WSCC, Desir for IBP years Council sixth form education distance to Chichester able 2016-2021 and special nearest option. College, as little educational Academy planned needs development in this cycle. Selsey IBP/ Social Community Extension to Space required Cost Selsey CIL 4 Not selected Selsey Town 115 Infrastr facilities Selsey to support unknown, Town Desir for IBP years Council ucture Centre additional user grant Council able 2016-2021 groups. funding, as little local planned fundraising development . in this cycle. Selsey IBP/ Social Community Developme Helps define Arts Dream CIL 4 Not selected Selsey Town 109 Infrastr facilities nt of Selsey as an Desir for IBP years Council ucture Community art/craft location. able 2016-2021 Arts Centre To be linked to as little the potential planned development of development an out of town in this cycle. supermarket or with the museum. Selsey IBP/ Social Community Soft play Local demand Selsey CIL 4 Not selected Selsey Town 116 Infrastr facilities area/indoor and nearest Town Desir for IBP years 50

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Council ucture play area facility is 20 Council able 2016-2021 for children miles away and as little is not accessible planned by public development transport in this cycle. Selsey IBP/ Social Community Cinema/The Lack of current £300,000 Private Sports CIL 4 Not selected Selsey Town 107 Infrastr facilities atre facility and match Operator Dream Desir for IBP years Council ucture refurbishme distance to funding (Grants as (Private able 2016-2021 nt nearest option available and when Operator as little available) and planned Community development ) in this cycle. Selsey IBP/ Social Streetscene Public Identified in Selsey CIL 4 Not selected Selsey Town 111 Infrastr and built space CDC's study of Town Desir for IBP years Council ucture environment enhanceme 2007 as a need Council able 2016-2021 nts ay East of regeneration as little Beach planned shops development in this cycle. Selsey IBP/ Social Streetscene Public In alignment £100,000 CIL 4 Not selected Selsey Town 117 Infrastr and built Realm with the East Desir for IBP years Council ucture environment Enhanceme Beach able 2016-2021 nts – East Masterplan by as little Beach CDC planned Shops development in this cycle. Selsey IBP/ Social Streetscene Layout Enhance public Selsey CIL 4 Not selected Selsey Town 105 Infrastr and built changes to realm to support Town Desir for IBP years Council ucture environment Selsey High High Street Council, able 2016-2021 Street to shops and WSCC as little provide on encourage use planned street of local development parking and amenities. in this cycle. more pedestrian space (round town one-way scheme or pedestrianis ation) Selsey IBP/ Social Streetscene Developme Creation of a Selsey CIL 4 Not selected Selsey Town 108 Infrastr and built nt of a Town central Town Desir for IBP years Council ucture environment Square community Council, able 2016-2021 space as WSCC as little nothing currently planned in place. development Enhance public in this cycle. realm to support High Street shops and to encourage use of local amenities. 51

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Selsey IBP/ Green Landscaping Access National policy Selsey CIL 3 Not selected Selsey Town 132 Infrastr , planting improvemen to create a Town Polic for IBP years Council ucture and ts to and coastal path. To Council, y 2016-2021 woodland establishme enhance visitor CDC, High as little creation and nt of coastal attraction and WSCC planned public rights path with tourism product development of way way finding and foster better in this cycle. links with the sea. Selsey IBP/ Green Playing Public To enhance Selsey CIL 4 Not selected Selsey Town 110 Infrastr fields, sports space visitor attraction Town Desir for IBP years Council ucture pitches, enhanceme and tourism Council, able 2016-2021 related build nts at East product and CDC as little and Beach foster better planned children's green (in links with the development play areas addition to sea. in this cycle. skate park, better play facilities, all weather sports courts) Selsey IBP/ Econo Employment/ Selsey Coastal 2017 Short DEFRA, CDC CIL 3 Selsey Town 587 mic Economic Haven defence; term European Polic Council security, safety (201 and y and 6- Marine High sustainability of 2023 Fisheries the fishing ) Fund, industry; LEADER, tourism; Coast to economy. Capital, LEP Sidlesham IBP/ Transp Cycle and Provision of Need to spread Initial Short Linked to Through Possibly CIL 3 Not selected Sidlesha Parish 134 ort pedestrian green visitor pressure impleme term drainage MPP and MWHG and Polic for IBP years m Council infrastructure corridor away from over ntation (201 and other possible MPP and y 2016-2021 habitat and concentration on mid 6- infrastruct MWHG. PC High as little walking Pagham 2015 2023 ure work Natural planned /cycling Harbour and and ) Est. £30k England development routes provide non car ongoing in this cycle. extending bourne access from routes into area. Pagham Provision of Harbour as wildlife corridors part of to link habitat GLAM areas Sidlesham IBP/ Transp Cycle Commuter Need for safe / Feasibilit Short £500k Possible Joint Other 3 Consider Sidlesha Parish 139 ort infrastructure cycle path segregated y Mid term Sport project Polic selecting if m Council Selsey to route for 2015 (201 England group y match Chichester commuters and and 6- /Big High funding is and as other users ongoing 2023 Lottery identified as tourist / ) WSCC this project recreational /CDC and supports the asset others growth of the area 52

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory provided it is for genuine community use. Sidlesham IBP/ Transp Local road B2145 Deterioration of Possible Short Est. £20k WSCC Sidlesham Other 4 Not selected Sidlesha Parish 136 ort network within roadside start late term other Parish Desir for IBP years m Council Sidlesham- environment and 2015 (201 grants and Council able 2016-2021 environment general ongoing 6- possible as little al disfigurement of 2023 use of planned improvemen landscape. Lack ) S106 and development t of ownership business in this cycle. programme responsibility for contributio public realm n Sidlesham IBP/ Social Built sport Refurbishm Current building Late Short Phase 1 Football Sidlesham CIL 4 Not selected Sidlesha Parish 133 Infrastr and leisure ent and dilapidated state 2015 – term £100k Foundatio FC Desir for IBP years m Council ucture facilities possible and risk of loss through (201 Phase 2 £ n, Football able 2016-2021 future to community 2016/17 6- 50 k Associatio as little extension of 2023 n, Sport planned community ) England, development sports CDC& in this cycle. building WSCC Sidlesham IBP/ Social Community Contingenc Possible loss of Conting Short Study In Big Lottery Sidlesham Other 4 Not selected Sidlesha Parish 137 Infrastr facilities y plan for existing church ency term house Communit Parish Desir for IBP years m Council ucture public hall at end of scoping (201 minimal y Buildings Council able 2016-2021 building lease. Possible and 6- cost. CDC and others as little (hall) failure of initial 2023 Adapted /WSCC planned proposals to analysis ) structure Numerous development refurbish fully study cost range other in this cycle. community mid £200- funding sports building 2016 300k sources .Need for New contingency building approach in assuming order that parish no land is not left without cost in a usable range building £500k- £800k Sidlesham IBP/ Green Flood and Phase 3 of Continued risk Start Short Initial SFLDG CIL 3 Sidlesha Parish 135 Infrastr coastal Sidlesham of flooding from late term phase and WSCC Polic m Council ucture erosion risk Flood and ground water 2015 (201 £20-30k as Lead y management Land and sea and ongoing 6- Flood and High Drainage Rife 2023 Land Group ) Drainage (SFLDG) Auth.Nation emergent al Flood forward plan forum Sidlesham IBP/ Green Landscaping Structural Need to control Depend Short £20 -30K LEADER Possible Other 4 Not selected Sidlesha Parish 138 Infrastr , planting Tree ground water s on term for tree and others lead Desir for IBP years m Council ucture and Planting to levels / need to possible (201 planting MWHG able 2016-2021 woodland reduce provide support- 6- and as little creation and water table renewable if 2023 fencing planned public rights and provide energy sources supporte ) assuming development of way biomass to combat d within no land in this cycle. 53

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory from Global Warming next five cost coppice year period and then ongoing Southbour IBP/ Transp Parking - £7,000 Southbour WSCC CIL 4 Parish may Southbo ne Parish 521 ort Double ne Parish Desir wish to urne Council yellow lines Council able consider at the funding from junctions of their CIL Lumley Road/Main Road, Lumley Road/Pagh am Close and Pagham Close/Sadle rs Walk - request from resident TRO Southbour IBP/ Transp Car parking Improveme Road safety and £30 CIL 4 Southbo ne Parish 694 ort nts to the to increase the Desir urne Council car park at usage of the able Prinsted. carpark whilst reducing maintenance costs. Southbour IBP/ Transp Cycle and Access to From a safety CIL 4 Southbo ne Parish 691 ort pedestrian the aspect, to help Desir urne Council infrastructure southside of keep children off able the Railway the main roads station and encourage people to cycle and creates to future footbridge. Southbour IBP/ Transp Local road New relief Need identified S106 SB/15/025 3 Committed Southbo ne Parish 662 ort network road in 05/OUT Polic urne Council Neighbourhood y Plan to relieve High pressure on Stein Road from increasing traffic and new developments Southbour IBP/ Transp Pedestrian New Identified in CIL 4 Parish may Southbo ne Parish 663 ort infrastructure footbridge Neighbourhood Desir wish to urne Council over railway Plan for Green able consider line Ring funding from their CIL 54

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Southbour IBP/ Transp Car parking Improveme Road safety and CIL Southbo ne Parish 701 ort nts to the to increase the urne Council car park at usage of the Prinsted. carpark whilst reducing maintenance costs. Southbour IBP/ Social Community Update/refu It is well used 4 Southbo ne Parish 700 Infrastr facilities rbish the (they have a Desir urne Council ucture Sea Scout long waiting list able Hut, to join) Prinsted Lane Southbour IBP/ Social Community Improveme Existing facilities CIL 4 Southbo ne Parish 693 Infrastr facilities nts to the within the Desir urne Council ucture Southbourn Village Hall are able e Village very basic, eg. Hall more storage is required. Southbour IBP/ Social Streetscene Parish £30,000- + Parish CIL 4 Southbo ne Parish 714 Infrastr and built owned £40,000 precept Desir urne Council ucture environment street light able replacement Southbour IBP/ Green Playing Improveme The current 4 Southbo ne Parish 692 Infrastr fields, sports nts to the facility is barely Desir urne Council ucture pitches, recreation fit for purpose. able related build ground and and pavilion children's play areas Tangmere IBP/ Transp Car parking Village Tarmac. £70,000.0 S106/NHB Tangmere S106 2 Committed Tangme Parish 150 ort Centre Car Current surface 0 Parish Esse re Council Park is worn and Council ntial floods in heavy rain. Area requires drainage and a tarmac surface installed with marked out parking spaces to make best use of area available and facilitate mobility impaired access. Tangmere IBP/ Transp Car parking New Car Current parking St St Andrews CIL 4 Parish may Tangme Parish 141 ort parking for congestion on Andrews Church Desir wish to re Council St. Church Lane Church able consider Andrew’s during funding from Church services/events their CIL will be exacerbated as 55

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory village expands. TNP Section 5.9 Tangmere IBP/ Transp Car parking Improve A detailed study CIL 4 Parish may Tangme Parish 145 ort safety and needs to be Desir wish to re Council increase car commissioned able consider parking and action funding from around the taken. Proposal their CIL One Stop supported by a Shop. large number of residents. Tangmere IBP/ Transp Cycle and Tangmere Improve Developer/ S106 4 Tangme Parish 716 ort pedestrian airfield sustainable and WSCC Desir re Council infrastructure orbital green transport able cycle/bridle network, utilising way/pedestr existing public ian/public rights of way rights of desire lines, way with Church Lane links to (south of airfield) Chichester and perimeter and track. LPP 18, Barnham TNPP 8 and 9, WSCC walking and cycling strategy App1, scheme id 192, 145, 291, 194 and 292. Tangmere IBP/ Transp Cycle Cycle Cycle routes Existing WSCC and S106 TG/14/007 2 Consider Tangme Parish 148 ort infrastructure routes and pathways - S106 - Tangmere 97/FUL; Esse selecting if re Council improve cycle TAD funds Parish TG/11/040 ntial match routes through Council 58/FUL funding is village to identified as encourage use this project of sustainable supports the transport and growth of the physical activity. area TNPP 8 & 9, provided it is WSCC Walking for genuine and Cycling community Strategy App 1, use. scheme ids: 192, 145, 291, 194, 292 Tangmere IBP/ Transp Local road Traffic This road is S106 2 Committed Tangme Parish 160 ort network calming on subject to "rat Esse re Council Tangmere running" and ntial Road high vehicle speeds which require inhibiting measures. Would also make road more attractive for 56

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory walking and cycling. TNP Section 5.9 Tangmere IBP/ Transp Local road Traffic TNP Section 5.9 WSCC and S106 2 Committed Tangme Parish 140 ort network Calming on Tangmere Esse re Council Meadow Parish ntial Way and Council Malcolm Road Tangmere IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Link(s) To improve WSCC and 4 Tangme Parish 638 ort infrastructure between connectivity Tangmere Desir re Council Marsh Lane between existing Parish able PROW 292 recreational Council. and WSCC paths along solar farm existing desire perimeter lines. TNP permissive Policy 9 path. Tangmere IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Extend Required as part Developer/ S106 4 Tangme Parish 717 ort infrastructure footway on of (refused) 50 WSCC Desir re Council north side of dwelling able Church proposal on Lane o/s Church Lane Tangmere (12/02378/OUT House. and 13/03804/OUT) therefore carry over to SDL. Tangmere IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Improveme To enable Hanger WSCC, 4 Tangme Parish 636 ort infrastructure nts to limited mobility site, TAD, Tangmere Desir re Council Chestnut users access S106 or Parish able Walk - St along route. SDL S106 Council Andrews and NHB. and St Church Andrews footway Church E73/FP282 Tangmere IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Marsh Lane To enable year SDL, WSCC and S106 4 Tangme Parish 637 ort infrastructure PROW 292 round foot/cycle Hanger, Tangmere Desir re Council - upgrade access between Meadow Parish able surface to Tangmere/Barn Way, S106 Council. replace ham areas and and NHB current recreational use water for expanding logged/mud populations. sections TNP Policy 9 Tangmere IBP/ Transp Public Bus To serve City £4,500.00 S106 Tangmere CIL 4 Parish may Tangme Parish 155 ort transport shelter(s) Fields business TAD/NHB Parish Desir wish to re Council park and Council able consider Blenheim park funding from housing their CIL development. Site at Hawker Close bus stop. Cover and 57

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory seating improvements required at other shelters Tangmere IBP/ Social Built sport Sports Sports Centre - £500,000. SDL/Hang Tangmere CIL TG/12/017 3 Consider Tangme Parish 161 Infrastr and leisure Hall(s) To provide a 00 er/Meadow Parish 39/OUT; Polic selecting if re Council ucture facilities multiple sports Way S106 Council TG/14/007 y match facility for the and NHB and 97/FUL High funding is enlarged village Developers identified as to be located in this project the centre of any supports the new large growth of the development area within the provided it is parish. for genuine community use. Tangmere IBP/ Social Community Tangmere Expand Tangmere Tangmere 4 Parish may Tangme Parish 149 Infrastr facilities Aviation museum inline Aviation Aviation Desir wish to re Council ucture Museum/He with Museum/G Museum able consider ritage Neighbourhood rants funding from Centre Plan policies their CIL which envisage extension into existing allotments which will relocate to SDL. LPP 18, TNPP 2 and 6. Tangmere IBP/ Social Community Improveme Small scale S106 and Tangmere S106 TG/07/045 4 Parish may Tangme Parish 143 Infrastr facilities nts to improvements to New Parish 77/FUL; Desir wish to re Council ucture existing facilities within Homes Council TG/12/017 able consider Community Village Centre to Bonus and 39/OUT, funding from Facilities improve utility of Developers TG/14/007 their CIL building for 97/FUL, users. TNP TG/11/040 Section 5.9 58/FUL Tangmere IBP/ Social Community Extension to Required to SDL S106 St Andrews S106 4 Parish may Tangme Parish 144 Infrastr facilities St Andrew’s cater for long Church Desir wish to re Council ucture Churchyard term need able consider for burial arising from funding from space expanded their CIL population. TNP Section 5.9 Tangmere IBP/ Social Community Church Hall TNP Section 5.9 SDL S106, St Andrews S106 4 Parish may Tangme Parish 162 Infrastr facilities (St Scouts Church and Desir wish to re Council ucture Andrews) and St Scouts able consider Andrews funding from Church their CIL Tangmere IBP/ Social Community Community New large £500,000. SDL/Hang Tangmere S106 TG/12/017 2 Committed Tangme Parish 153 Infrastr facilities Centre community 00 er/Meadow Parish 39/OUT; Esse re Council ucture centre required Way S106 Council TG/14/007 ntial to cater for the and NHB. and 97/FUL village, which Developer 58

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory the existing Village Centre cannot accommodate any more due to it being so well used. The Village Centre is limited in size for the population. TNP Policy 2 and 9. LPP 18 Tangmere IBP/ Green Allotments Improveme Additional £5,000.00 New Tangmere S106 4 Parish may Tangme Parish 147 Infrastr nts to equipment Homes Parish Desir wish to re Council ucture existing required to Bonus Council able consider allotments upgrade funding from facilities - water their CIL troughs, composting bins, (this is a large scale project) access to toilets. Tangmere IBP/ Green Flood and Tangmere Numerous Operation CIL 4 Tangme Parish 722 Infrastr coastal Road defects and Watershed Desir re Council ucture erosion risk (Jerrard Rd blockages within , NHB, CIL able management to Chestnut pipework on Walk) both sides of Tangmere Rd resulting in surface flows along/across carriageways and junctions. Requires relaying of defective pipework. Tangmere IBP/ Green Flood and Nettleton New soakaway Operation CIL 4 Tangme Parish 723 Infrastr coastal Avenue in recreation Watershed Desir re Council ucture erosion risk field to serve , NHB, CIL able management existing and new road gullies, utilising redundant foul sewer lines and access pits for conveyance and storage. To provide a diversion of flows from existing system arrangements 59

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory which discharge on to Tangmere Rd. Tangmere IBP/ Green Flood and Cheshire New soakaway Operation CIL 4 Tangme Parish 721 Infrastr coastal Crescent sw corner (land Watershed Desir re Council ucture erosion risk owned by 100 , NHB, CIL able management Mannock Rd). Failure of soakaways on Cheshire Crescent/Manno ck Rd increased flows to estate low point creates inundation of carriageway and domestic curtilage, flooding of dwellings and sewage pumping station. Tangmere IBP/ Green Flood and Malcolm Loss of drainage Operation CIL 4 Tangme Parish 718 Infrastr coastal Road line, Chestnut Watershed Desir re Council ucture erosion risk diversion of Walk, , NHB, CIL able management surplus surcharging of and SDL flows from gullies on drainage recreation Malcolm Rd infrastructu field ditch to leads to re. existing carriageway and soakaways domestic within inundation on recreation Malcolm Rd, field. surface flows on to Tangmere Rd (NB, OPUS recommendation for new channel to discharge West of Cheshire Crescent Estate). Tangmere IBP/ Green Flood and Garland New soakaways Operation CIL 4 Tangme Parish 720 Infrastr coastal Square (within Hyde Watershed Desir re Council ucture erosion risk owned land to , NHB, CIL able management southwest of No. 25) to replace lost discharge to south through Middleton Gardens. Current slow 60

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory discharge to ground via pipe ends/breaks leads to inundation of southwest part of Garland Sq. Tangmere IBP/ Green Flood and Diversion of Current Operation CIL 4 Tangme Parish 719 Infrastr coastal Church discharge is via Watershed Desir re Council ucture erosion risk Lane/Bayley a level gradient , NHB, CIL able management Rd flows. to Tangmere and SDL Rd/Church Lane drainage junction infrastructu resulting in re. inundation of Church Lane. New drainage proposed via fields south of Church Lane to link with existing ditch crossing the Tangmere Straight west of Museum bend. Tangmere IBP/ Green Landscaping New and Amenity, NHB, CIL 4 Tangme Parish 715 Infrastr , planting replacement biodiversity and S106 Desir re Council ucture and trees drainage able woodland throughout management creation and the Parish. improvements. public rights Note of way requirement to include this in IBP to support future NHB applications. Tangmere IBP/ Green Playing Outdoor Overall provision CIL 3 Parish may Tangme Parish 159 Infrastr fields, sports recreation of outdoor Polic wish to re Council ucture pitches, areas recreation areas y consider related build below that High funding from and required for their CIL children's existing and play areas permitted Village size - see TPC response to latest CDC LPR related Open Space Study Consultation. Tangmere IBP/ Green Playing Current Changing rooms £20,000.0 Hanger/Me Tangmere CIL 4 Tangme Parish 152 Infrastr fields, sports changing/S are currently 0 adow Way Parish Desir re Council ucture pitches, ports very tired and S106 and Council able related build Pavilion need NHB and modernisation. 61

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory children's This is to meet play areas current day requirements and standards and multi use availability. New showers and tiled areas required plus replacement of wash basins and installation of hot water supply. Tangmere IBP/ Green Playing Football and Malcolm Rd £10,000 - S106 Tangmere S106 TG/12/017 4 Tangme Parish 157 Infrastr fields, sports cricket Recreation Field Verti-drain (Hanger/M Parish 39/OUT; Desir re Council ucture pitches, sports pitch - Current poor sandfill. eadow Council TG/14/007 able related build areas - land drainage Land Way sport 97/FUL and Verti- (no renewal of drains to S106) children's drain/sand land drainage be play areas backfill and known of since confirmed. new drains. RAF ceased maintenance in late 1960's) leads to greater frequency of match cancellations, due to ground conditions. Tangmere IBP/ Green Public open Hedge To improve £2500 NHB, CIL Tangmere CIL 4 Tangme Parish 639 Infrastr space around biodiversity Parish Desir re Council ucture Malcolm connectivity and Council able Road bolster recreation unauthorised ground. vehicular access preventative measures. Tangmere IBP/ Green Public open Land to be To expand S106 4 Details of Tangme Parish 142 Infrastr space made community Desir project re Council ucture available for orchard and/or able insufficient community community groups to garden develop for provision. TNP suitable Section 5.9 purposes Tangmere IBP/ Green Public open Tangmere Local Plan SDL S106 Developers S106 3 Tangme Parish 592 Infrastr space SDL policy 18, Polic re Council ucture specific Tangmere y green Neighbourhood High infrastructur Plan, policies 2 e (all types) ,8 and 9. Separates out projects specific 62

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory to this SDL. Tangmere IBP/ Utility Utility Broadband Requires Developers Details of Tangme Parish 158 Service services coverage provision of /Telecom project re Council s infrastructure to providers insufficient support superfast standards. Westbour IBP/ Transp Car parking A car park To ease Westbou ne Parish 640 ort that can be congestion on rne Council used by the roads, help residents/vi shoppers use sitors the local facilities. Westbour IBP/ Transp Local road Street 4 Not selected Westbou ne Parish 558 ort network lighting, Desir for IBP years rne Council some need able 2016-2021 replacing as little planned development in this cycle. Westbour IBP/ Social Community Developme Westbourne CIL 4 Not selected Westbou ne Parish 563 Infrastr facilities nt of a doesn’t have a Desir for IBP years rne Council ucture parish hall. parish hall and able 2016-2021 is very reliant on as little the facilities planned provided by the development Baptist Church in this cycle. and St Johns Church. Westbour IBP/ Social Community Public seats 4 Not selected Westbou ne Parish 557 Infrastr facilities around the Desir for IBP years rne Council ucture parish could able 2016-2021 do with as little replacing. planned On the development corner of in this cycle. East Street, the Parish Council is having to get rid of two. Westbour IBP/ Social Community Two more £700 Westbourn Other 4 Not selected Westbou ne Parish 556 Infrastr facilities picnic e Parish Desir for IBP years rne Council ucture benches Council able 2016-2021 required at as little Monks Hill planned due to development success of in this cycle. those already installed.

63

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Westbour IBP/ Social Community The Cub It is a WW2 4 Not selected Westbou ne Parish 555 Infrastr facilities Scout Hall army building Desir for IBP years rne Council ucture needs a with agricultural able 2016-2021 good face- asbestos in the as little lift. roof. The hut is planned used by the development scouts and by in this cycle. other community groups/events. Westbour IBP/ Social Community The 4 Not selected Westbou ne Parish 559 Infrastr facilities Meeting Desir for IBP years rne Council ucture Place - The able 2016-2021 hall would as little benefit from planned refurbishme development nt to make it in this cycle. a better more sophisticate d community facility. Westbour IBP/ Green Playing The play The play 4 Not selected Westbou ne Parish 565 Infrastr fields, sports equipment equipment is Desir for IBP years rne Council ucture pitches, at Monks approaching the able 2016-2021 related build Hill needs end of its sell- as little and replacing. by-date planned children's development play areas in this cycle. Westbour IBP/ Public Cemetery Developme The existing Needs Short CIL 2 Not selected Westbou ne Parish 554 and nt of the cemetery will be to be term Esse for IBP years rne Council Comm cemetery’s full in 2-5 years. used in (201 ntial 2016-2021 unity new 2 acre A new field has 2-5 6- as little Service field to been purchased years. 2023 planned s make it and needs to be ) development suitable for made ready in this cycle. burials. Includes plot structure and layout of pathways. Westham IBP/ Transp Car parking Stane Parking restricts As soon Short Highways CIL 4 Parish may Westha pnett 176 ort Street traffic flow and as term Desir wish to mpnett Parish parking ped’ road possible (201 able consider Council crossing 6- funding from 2023 their CIL ) Westham IBP/ Transp Cycle Cycle Paths Lack of As soon Short Highways CIL 2 Consider Westha pnett 174 ort infrastructure into provision as term Esse selecting if mpnett Parish Chichester possible (201 ntial match Council 6- funding is 2023 identified as 64

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory ) this project supports the growth of the area provided it is for genuine community use. Westham IBP/ Transp Local road Speed Excessive As soon Short Highways CIL 4 Parish may Westha pnett 168 ort network cameras to speed between as term Desir wish to mpnett Parish Madgwick RaB and Barns possible (201 able consider Council Lane 6- funding from 2023 their CIL ) Westham IBP/ Transp Local road Madgwick Excessive As soon Short Highways CIL 4 Parish may Westha pnett 175 ort network Lane Traffic speeding as term Desir wish to mpnett Parish calming between RaB possible (201 able consider Council and Barns 6- funding from 2023 their CIL ) Westham IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Street Lack of As soon Short Highways CIL 4 Parish may Westha pnett 167 ort infrastructure lighting to provision as term Desir wish to mpnett Parish Madgwick possible (201 able consider Council Lane 6- funding from 2023 their CIL ) Westham IBP/ Transp Pedestrian Pavements Pedestrian As soon Short Highways CIL 4 Parish may Westha pnett 169 ort infrastructure to hazards road as term Desir wish to mpnett Parish Madgwick crossing possible (201 able consider Council Lane 6- funding from 2023 their CIL ) Westham IBP/ Transp Transport - Acoustic Sound pollution As soon Short Highways CIL 4 Parish may Westha pnett 177 ort A27 fencing to from traffic as term Desir wish to mpnett Parish the A27 possible (201 able consider Council 6- funding from 2023 their CIL ) Westham IBP/ Educati Preschool New Double existing In Short Education CIL 4 Parish may Westha pnett 163 on and Primary Primary population readines term Desir wish to mpnett Parish school School and s for (201 able consider Council Preschool propose 6- funding from d 2023 their CIL housing ) develop ments Westham IBP/ Health Community New GP Doubling As soon Short National CIL 4 Parish may Westha pnett 166 healthcare, surgery and population as term Health Desir wish to mpnett Parish primary care dispensary possible (201 able consider Council facilities & 6- funding from improvement 2023 their CIL s ) Westham IBP/ Social Community Parish Hall Westhampnett Timeline Short £1,500,00 S106 To be S106 WH/04/03 2 Committed Westha 65

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory pnett 171 Infrastr facilities currently has no is term 0 (Scale (historic delivered 947/OUT; Esse mpnett Parish ucture community dependa (201 of building receipt). by WH/15/03 ntial Council buildings and nt on the 6- still to be S106 to be developer 524/OUTE has long aspired phasing 2023 determine secured. in IA to develop one of two ) d based New partnership at a number of different on Homes with locations. develop complexit Bonus Westhamp ment y of nett PC sites – bringing) Madgew ick Lane strategic site, and Maudlin Nurserie s Westham IBP/ Green Allotments Allotment Would like one. Medi Westhamp CIL 4 Westha pnett 687 Infrastr site um to nett Parish Desir mpnett Parish ucture long Council able Council term (202 3- 2029 ) Westham IBP/ Green Flood and Ditch No current As soon Short CDC CIL 4 Parish may Westha pnett 164 Infrastr coastal clearance provision other as term Desir wish to mpnett Parish ucture erosion risk than volunteers possible (201 able consider Council management 6- funding from 2023 their CIL ) Westham IBP/ Green Flood and Sewage To support new As soon Short Developer Other 1 Committed Westha pnett 178 Infrastr coastal system development as term Critic mpnett Parish ucture erosion risk improvemen and ensure that possible (201 al Council management ts the risk of 6- flooding to 2023 existing ) properties is not unacceptably increased. Westham IBP/ Green Flood and New To support new As soon Short Developer CIL 3 Parish may Westha pnett 179 Infrastr coastal Surface development as term Polic wish to mpnett Parish ucture erosion risk water and ensure that possible (201 y consider Council management measures the risk of 6- High funding from flooding to 2023 their CIL existing ) properties is not acceptably increased. Westham IBP/ Green Playing Outside Mitigation for As soon Short Sport S106 2 Committed Westha pnett 170 Infrastr fields, sports sports Westhampnett as term England Esse mpnett Parish ucture pitches, facilities SDL possible (201 CDC ntial Council related build Football, 6- and Cricket, 2023 children's changing ) 66

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory play areas rooms Westham IBP/ Green Playing MUGA Mitigation for ASAP Short Sport S106 2 Committed Westha pnett 172 Infrastr fields, sports outside play Westhampnett term England Esse mpnett Parish ucture pitches, area SDL (201 ntial Council related build 6- and 2023 children's ) play areas Wisborou IBP/ Transp Local road Built out in Reduce speed 2016- Short CIL and Wisboroug CIL 4 Parish may Wisboro gh Green 690 ort network Durbans through centre 2021 term other h Green Desir wish to ugh Parish Road of village (linked (201 Parish able consider Green Council with new 6- Council funding from Winterfold 2023 CIL development) ) Wisborou IBP/ Transp Local road Highway Village centre - 2016- Short CIL and Wisboroug CIL 4 Parish may Wisboro gh Green 689 ort network alterations to improve 2021 term other h Green Desir wish to ugh Parish safety and to (201 able consider Green Council reduce speed at 6- funding from the junction. 2023 CIL ) Wisborou IBP/ Transp Local road Creating a Reduce speed 2016- Short CIL and Wisboroug CIL 4 Parish may Wisboro gh Green 228 ort network buffer zone on A272 - road 2021 term other h Green Desir wish to ugh Parish before the and pedestrian (201 Parish able consider Green Council 30mph zone safety. 6- Council funding from on A272 2023 their CIL west side of ) village Wisborou IBP/ Transp Local road School Create drop off 2016- Short CIL and Wisboroug CIL 4 28/11/16 - Wisboro gh Green 227 ort network Safety Zone area in School 2021 term other h Green Desir CDC has ugh Parish - Road to improve (201 Parish able made Green Council Wisborough safety and 6- Council provision of Green improve on site 2023 £55,000 for Primary parking at ) North East School school. Parishes. Wisborou IBP/ Transp Local road Traffic Wisborough CIL 4 Parish may Wisboro gh Green 224 ort network calming Green are Desir wish to ugh Parish throughout currently able consider Green Council the village developing a funding from Traffic their CIL Management Plan - new issues may come through as a result and older issues may be removed in place Wisborou IBP/ Transp Local road Lengthening Village Centre - 2016- Short CIL and Wisboroug CIL 4 Parish may Wisboro gh Green 229 ort network double to improve 2017 term other h Green Desir wish to ugh Parish yellow lines safety at the (201 Parish able consider Green Council outside the junction. 6- Council funding from Cricketers 2023 their CIL Arms ) 67

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phasing Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id ry Type Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Wisborou IBP/ Transp Local road Provision of Increase safe 2016- Short CIL and Wisboroug CIL 4 Parish may Wisboro gh Green 226 ort network laybys in parking areas 2021 term other h Green Desir wish to ugh Parish Durbans around the (201 Parish able consider Green Council Road Green and also 6- Council funding from for use by the 2023 their CIL School ) Wisborou IBP/ Social Community Improveme Current building within Short £500,000 CIL/S106 Village Hall CIL WR/14/00 4 Parish may Wisboro gh Green 588 Infrastr facilities nts to the needs next 5 term Manageme 748/OUT Desir wish to ugh Parish ucture Village Hall. modernisation, years (201 nt able consider Green Council improved 6- Committee funding from accessibility for 2023 and Parish their CIL all and storage. ) Council Wisborou IBP/ Social Community Improveme Modernisation CIL 4 Parish may Wisboro gh Green 589 Infrastr facilities nts to public and DDA Desir wish to ugh Parish ucture toilets compliance. able consider Green Council funding from their CIL Wisborou IBP/ Green Playing Village To reduce water £65,000 CIL 4 Parish may Wisboro gh Green 590 Infrastr fields, sports Green logging to Desir wish to ugh Parish ucture pitches, drainage improve surface able consider Green Council related build for sports and funding from and community use. their CIL children's play areas Wisborou IBP/ Green Playing Trim trail Reduce CIL and Wisboroug CIL 4 Parish may Wisboro gh Green 688 Infrastr fields, sports exercise pressure on the other h Green Desir wish to ugh Parish ucture pitches, path and Village Green Parish able consider Green Council related build associated and creation of Council funding from and wild flower new public open CIL children's meadow space. play areas

Chichester District Council projects Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory Chicheste IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Improve Parish-wide 2015 Short CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford r District 319 rt pedestrian local - term Desir wish to Council infrastructur footpaths, 2029 (2016 able consider e cycle tracks - funding from & 2023) their CIL equestrian ways (Kirdford) Chicheste IBP/ Transpo Local road Boxgrove - Boxgrove CIL 4 Not selected Boxgrov r District 199 rt network Improveme Parish Desir for IBP years e Council nts to Council, able 2016-2021 as pedestrian CDC & little planned safety and WSCC development reducing in this cycle. 68

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory traffic speeds in Boxgrove, whilst protecting the special character of the conservatio n area Chicheste IBP/ Transpo Local road Fishbourne Reduce traffic Fishbourne CIL 4 Parish may Fishbour r District 211 rt network -Traffic speeds and Parish Desir wish to ne Council Calming improve the Council, able consider Measures environment and CDC, funding from enhance WSCC their CIL conservation area character – including settings of listed buildings Chicheste IBP/ Transpo Local road Halnaker - Conservation Boxgrove CIL 4 Not selected Halnaker r District 213 rt network Improveme and Parish Desir for IBP years Council nts to enhancement of Council, able 2016-2021 as pedestrian historic CDC, little planned safety and environment WSCC development reducing in this cycle. traffic speeds in Halnaker, particularly along the A286, whilst protecting the special character of the conservatio n area Chicheste IBP/ Transpo Pedestrian Fishbourne Improve WSCC, CIL 4 Parish may Fishbour r District 210 rt infrastructur - Improve pedestrian Fisbourne Desir wish to ne Council e pavements safety and also Parish able consider enhance the Council funding from historic their CIL environment. Boost local economy. Will also improve capacity to accommodate growth Chicheste IBP/ Transpo Public Chichester - Improve the CIL 4 Reserved for Chichest r District 206 rt transport Southern environment and Desir next phasing er Council Gateway enhance able period 69

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory Area should conservation be properly area character – masterplan including ned to settings of listed include the buildings. provision of Improve access a bus/rail to City Centre. interchange Would help the and city proposed accommodate improveme impact of growth nts to traffic around the and periphery. pedestrian circulation (Cross reference IBP/351) Chicheste IBP/ Social Community West of Experience of Befor Short Unknown Provided by Developer, S106 2 Committed Chichest r District 190 Infrastru facilities Chichester large e term Developer will require Essen er Council cture – developments first (2016 under S106 a tial Temporary with protracted 100 - community community build out units 2023) lead either facilities demonstrates Chichester the need for City early delivery of Council, or community other space, nominated temporary or new provision of group same, or “meanwhile” use of other designated space, to facilitate early development of community Chicheste IBP/ Social Community Donnington Existing building Subj Short £250-300k Local Donnington S106 D/07/047 4 Committed Donningt r District 193 Infrastru facilities Church Hall can no longer ect term fundraising PCC 32/FUL, Desir on Council cture – extension cope with the to (2016 and private through D/11/011 able level of demand plan - donations, Manageme 98/FUL; given local ning 2023) S106, NHB nt D/12/044 population perm or grants? Committee 10/FUL growth. Devised issio (although a side extension n are that would proje identifying provide ct some additional likely capacity meeting space, to issues or dedicated youth com lack of area men relevant ce experience 2016 to project 70

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory manage) Chicheste IBP/ Social Community Village On land south 2015 Short CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford r District 321 Infrastru facilities Social & east of - term Desir wish to Council cture Recreationa Townfield 2025 (2016 able consider l Hub - funding from (Kirdford) 2023) their CIL Chicheste IBP/ Social Community Shopwhyke Experience of Befor Short Unknown Provide by Developer, S106 O/11/052 2 Committed Oving r District 189 Infrastru facilities – large e term Developer will require 83/OUT Essen Council cture Temporary developments first (2016 under S106 a tial community with protracted 100 - community Facilities build out units 2023) lead either demonstrates Oving PC, the need for or other early delivery of nominated community or new space, group temporary provision of same, or “meanwhile” use of other designated space, to facilitate early development of community Chicheste IBP/ Social Community Extension Required for S106 SY/14/02 4 Committed Selsey r District 313 Infrastru facilities to Selsey storage and 186/OUT Desir Council cture Centre additional, EIA; able regularly SY/15/00 requested 490/FUL facilities Chicheste IBP/ Social Community Soft play Nearest facility CIL 4 Not selected Selsey r District 314 Infrastru facilities area/indoor is 20 miles away Desir for IBP years Council cture play area and is not able 2016-2021 as for children accessible by little planned (Selsey) public transport development in this cycle. Chicheste IBP/ Social Community Southbourn Existing building Linke Medi £500k Contribution Age CIL SB/14/02 4 Consider Southbo r District 192 Infrastru facilities e – is beyond its d to um to broad s to be Concern 800/OUT Desir selecting if urne Council cture replacemen useful life and the long estimate sought form Southbourn able match funding t of Age needs phasi term (assuming a number of e, hopefully is identified as Concern redevelopment ng of (2023 tenure of Southbourn with the this project Building to meet the perm - land e support of supports the (multi-use needs of the itted 2029) secured permissions the PC and growth of the community growing sites without NP group. area provided building) community arou purchase) it is for (identified within nd genuine NP) Sout community hbou use. rne, but the 71

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory next five year s will requi re the resol ution of land tenur e, devel opm ent of a form al sche me for rede velop ment etc. Chicheste IBP/ Social Streetscene Chichester - Conservation CIL 4 City Council Chichest r District 208 Infrastru and built Re- and Desir may wish to er Council cture environmen introduction enhancement of able consider t of natural historic funding from stone environment. their CIL paving Refer to Public within the Realm and City centre, Accessibility particularly Enhancement for The Strategy Pallants, September Westgate, 2005. Northgate, Southgate and Eastgate Square, as funds permit. Chicheste IBP/ Social Streetscene Chichester - Conservation CIL 4 City Council Chichest r District 207 Infrastru and built Preservatio and Desir may wish to er Council cture environmen n and enhancement of able consider t maintenanc historic funding from e of environment. their CIL traditional Refer to Public stone Realm and flagged Accessibility streets, Enhancement 72

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory which must Strategy be September protected. 2005. To ensure that all of these surfaces are protected and repaired as necessary, using traditional techniques and materials. Chicheste IBP/ Social Streetscene St Martin's Improve the CDC, CIL 4 City Council Chichest r District 204 Infrastru and built Street/ environment and WSCC Desir may wish to er Council cture environmen Crooked S enhance able consider t Twitten, conservation funding from Chichester area character – their CIL This is a including popular settings of listed pedestrian buildings. May route also improve currently capacity to meet poorly growth. maintained Improved visitor and experience and detailed. economic Area should benefits for City be Centre. redesigned to include the provision of new paving and new street furniture, as well as a new retail unit. Chicheste IBP/ Social Streetscene Public In alignment with CIL 4 Not selected Selsey r District 309 Infrastru and built space the East Beach Desir for IBP years Council cture environmen enhanceme Masterplan by able 2016-2021 as t nts by East CDC little planned Beach development green (in in this cycle. addition to skate park, better play facilities, all 73

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory weather sports courts) (Selsey) Chicheste IBP/ Green Biodiversity Brandy NPPF policy 2017 Short £10,000 CIL CDC, BHC CIL 3 Consider Chichest r District 196 Infrastru measures Hole Copse 117. As above. - term Manageme Policy selecting if er Council cture – Policy 15. West 2018 (2016 nt Board High match funding restoration of Chichester - is identified as and Strategic 2023) this project enhanceme Development supports the nt works at Site (draft Local growth of the Brandy Plan) area provided Hole local it is for Nature genuine Reserve community use. Chicheste IBP/ Green Biodiversity Enhanceme To comply with 2016 Short 50,000 Cost EA, CDC, CIL 3 Lavant r District 194 Infrastru measures nts to the NPPF 109, 114 - term unknown, Goodwood Policy and Council cture Lavant and 117 and 2020 (2016 grant Estates High Westha Biodiversity Draft Local Plan - funding, (Landowner mpnett Opportunity Policy 49: 2023) local ), Sussex Area – Biodiversity fundraising. Wildlife enhanceme Trust, nts to the Contractor, stretch of SDNPA, the Lavant, Southern north of the Water. Westhampn ett strategic developme nt site, connecting to the SDNP. Chicheste IBP/ Green Biodiversity FLOW Lawton Report 2016 Short 545,300 Heritage MWHG and Other 3 Consider Manhoo r District 197 Infrastru measures Project and Natural – term Lottery FLOW Policy selecting if d Council cture (Fixing and Environment 2021 (2016 Funding Project High match funding Peninsul Linking Our White Paper - secured. Board is identified as a Wetlands) – (2011) 2023) (including this project improving We must: CDC) supports the and • improve the growth of the enhancing quality of current area provided the wildlife sites by it is for wetlands better habitat genuine habitat on management; community the • increase the use. Manhood size of existing Peninsula wildlife sites; • enhance connections between sites, either through physical c 74

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory Chicheste IBP/ Green Flood and Local West Sussex 2015 Short £100k FDGIA/WS WSCC CIL 3 Not selected Birdham r District 289 Infrastru coastal Drainage - Local Flood Risk - term CC Policy for CIL funding Council cture erosion risk Crooked Management 2020 (2016 High because this manageme Lane, Strategy 2015 - project does nt Birdham 2023) not support the Surface growth of the Water area. Drainage Improveme nts Chicheste IBP/ Green Flood and Local Local Flood Risk 2015 Short £250k WSCC PC, CDC & Other 3 Selected District r District 288 Infrastru coastal Drainage - Management - term WSCC Policy wide Council cture erosion risk Local West Sussex 2025 (2016 High manageme watercours Local Flood Risk - nt e network Management 2023) improveme Strategy 2015 nts identified on the West Sussex Local Flood Risk Manageme nts Priority List. Chicheste IBP/ Green Flood and Local West Sussex 2015 Short £10k None CDC, CIL 3 Not selected Hambro r District 291 Infrastru coastal Drainage - Local Flood Risk - term WSCC Policy for IBP years ok Council cture erosion risk The Management 2020 (2016 High 2016-2021 as manageme Avenue, Strategy 2015 - little planned nt Hambrook 2023) development Watercours in this cycle. e re- construction Chicheste IBP/ Green Flood and Coast Policy 10 of 2020 Medi £1,000,00 FDGIA est. CDC CIL 3 Reserved for Selsey r District 570 Infrastru coastal Protection - Draft Local Plan - um to 0 £750k CDC Policy next phasing Council cture erosion risk Selsey – “Mitigating and 2025 long est. £250k High period manageme Wittering adapting to term nt Beach climate change” (2023 Manageme - nt 2021- 2029) 2026 Chicheste IBP/ Green Flood and Local land Policy 10 of 2018 Short 100,000- CDC CIL 3 Select for CIL Selsey r District 293 Infrastru coastal Drainage - Draft Local Plan - term 150,000 Policy funding if the Council cture erosion risk East Beach “Mitigating and 2019 (2016 High majority of manageme Sea Outfall adapting to - money is nt climate change” 2023) match funded. West Sussex This project Local Flood Risk can Management demonstrate it Strategy 2015 can assist the growth of the area. Chicheste IBP/ Green Flood and Coast Policy 10 of 2020 Medi £5m FDGIA, a CDC CIL 3 Consider Selsey 75

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory r District 287 Infrastru coastal Protection - Draft Local Plan – um to contribution Policy selecting if Council cture erosion risk Selsey East “Mitigating and 2025 long likely to be High match funding manageme Beach – adapting to term required is identified as nt Raising of climate change” (2023 (shortfall) this project the Sea - supports the Wall 2029) growth of the area provided it is for genuine community use. Chicheste IBP/ Green Flood and Access Development of CIL 3 Consider Selsey r District 315 Infrastru coastal improveme a good path Policy selecting if Council cture erosion risk nts to and round the whole High match funding manageme establishme peninsula with is identified as nt nt of coastal facilities at this project path with various locations supports the way finding around it. growth of the (Manhood area provided Peninsular) it is for genuine community use. Chicheste IBP/ Green Flood and Coast Policy 10 of 2015 Short £1,000,00 FDGIA est. CDC CIL 3 Select for CIL Selsey r District 290 Infrastru coastal Protection - Draft Local Plan - term 0 £750k CDC Policy funding if the Council cture erosion risk Selsey – “Mitigating and 2020 (2016 est. £250k High majority of manageme Wittering adapting to - money is nt Beach climate change” 2023) match funded. Manageme This project nt 2016- can 2021 demonstrate it can assist the growth of the area. Chicheste IBP/ Green Landscapin New Development 2015 Short CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford r District 318 Infrastru g, planting footpaths & Site North of - term Desir wish to Council cture and Community Village 2029 (2016 able consider woodland Amenity - funding from creation Space 2023) their CIL and public (Kirdford) rights of way Chicheste IBP/ Green Landscapin Amenity Improvement of 2014 Short £? From Parish S106 2 Committed Southbo r District 308 Infrastru g, planting tree street scene, - term Developer Council Essen urne Council cture and planting increased 2029 (2016 contributio tial woodland Harbour biodiversity, - ns, creation SPA Solent contribution to 2023) WSCC, and public Disturbance improved air CDC rights of & mitigation quality. SPNP way Project Pre-Sub Plan Proposal 2 Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Resite Shared use of 2020 Short £500k Parish CIL 4 Not selected Bosham r District 302 Infrastru fields, football club recreation term Council Desir for IBP years 76

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory Council cture sports (Bosham) ground (2016 able 2016-2021 as pitches, public/school/FC - little planned related build unsatisfactory & 2023) development and prohibitive to in this cycle. children's promotion/advan play areas cement Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing New Sports Improve public 2020 Short £100k Parish/WS CIL 4 Not selected Bosham r District 303 Infrastru fields, pitch spaces and term From CC Desir for IBP years Council cture sports (Bosham) allow football to (2016 WSCC able 2016-2021 as pitches, meet safety - little planned related build standards 2023) development and in this cycle. children's play areas Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Improveme Existing cricket CIL 4 Not selected Boxgrov r District 324 Infrastru fields, nts to pavilion in need Desir for IBP years e Council cture sports sports of improvements able 2016-2021 as pitches, pavilion to meet the little planned related build (Boxgrove) requirements for development and the teams using in this cycle. children's Boxgrove cricket play areas pitch. Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Watersports Provision of CIL 4 Not selected Brackles r District 325 Infrastru fields, Centre at storage, Desir for IBP years ham Bay Council cture sports Bracklesha showers and able 2016-2021 as pitches, m Bay teaching space little planned related build (East for watersports development and Wittering at Bracklesham in this cycle. children's and Bay play areas Bracklesha m) Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Outdoor Provision of CIL 4 Not selected Brackles r District 326 Infrastru fields, Gym (East outdoor gym Desir for IBP years ham Bay Council cture sports Wittering equipment and able 2016-2021 as pitches, and exercise circuit little planned related build Bracklesha at Beech development and m) Avenue, in this cycle. children's Bracklesham play areas Bay Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing 3G football Clubs single Football Chichester CIL 3 Consider Chichest r District 297 Infrastru fields, pitches at pitch currently Foundation, City United Policy selecting if er Council cture sports Chichester cannot CDC grant, FC High match funding pitches, City United accommodate Club funds is identified as related build FC all of the training this project and (Chichester and match supports the children's ) requirements for growth of the play areas the club. Club area provided are looking to it is for develop 3G full genuine size and/or small community sided pitches to use. enable club to cater for all 77

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory teams including senior, youth and ladies. Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Store and Provision of a £100k? S106, CDC CIL 4 City Council Chichest r District 301 Infrastru fields, toilet facility small built facility Capital Desir may wish to er Council cture sports at New to serve the mini able consider pitches, Park Road and junior pitch funding from related build (Chichester provision at New their CIL and ) Park Road children's play areas Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Improved Currently the £200k? S106, CIL 3 Consider Chichest r District 300 Infrastru fields, sports pitches at the Football Policy selecting if er Council cture sports pitches and southern end of Foundation, High match funding pitches, pavilion at Oaklands Park ECB is identified as related build the suffer during wet this project and Southern periods as the supports the children's end of pitches become growth of the play areas Oaklands unusable. The area provided Park. gradient of the it is for pitches also genuine makes them community undesirable. A use. cut and fill and drainage scheme could assist to provide additional pitches f Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Developme Existing facility £150k Sport Chichester CIL 4 City Council Chichest r District 296 Infrastru fields, nt of new is storage and England Bowmen Desir may wish to er Council cture sports clubhouse clubhouse. Grants/Loa able consider pitches, for Does not meet ns, Club funding from related build Chichester DDA reserves, their CIL and Bowmen to requirement and CDC grant children's incorporate club have a play areas an indoor number of shooting disabled range participants. An (Chichester indoor range ) would allow them to shoot indoors during the winter without the need to hire other facilities which cost the club. Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Developme Chichester £1.3m CPPHC CPPHC CIL 3 Consider Chichest r District 295 Infrastru fields, nt of water Priory Park Club Policy selecting if er Council cture sports based Hockey Club Fundraising High match funding pitches, Artificial have progressed , England is identified as related build Grass Pitch well in league Hockey, this project 78

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory and for hockey competition but Sport supports the children's and they require England, growth of the play areas associated improved CIL area provided pavilion/clu facilities to meet it is for bhouse league genuine requirements. community Current use. clubhouse facilities are shared with the Cricket Club in Priory Park. Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Developme Existing facility £350k Sport CDC CIL 3 Consider Chichest r District 294 Infrastru fields, nt of a new does not meet England Policy selecting if er Council cture sports cricket requirements of Grants, High match funding pitches, pavilion for ECB Club is identified as related build Chichester fundraising this project and Priory Park supports the children's Cricket growth of the play areas Club area provided it is for genuine community use. Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Completion Currently a £1.365m University University of CIL 3 Consider Chichest r District 298 Infrastru fields, of 400m sprint strip exists of Chichester/ Policy selecting if er Council cture sports running at the University Chichester, CR&AC High match funding pitches, track at of Chichester CR&AC, is identified as related build University but the CIL, NHB, this project and of aspirations of Sport supports the children's Chichester. the University England growth of the play areas and the area provided Chichester it is for Runners and genuine Athletics Club is community to complete the use. track to provide a 400m running track with associated jump and throw facilities. Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Permanent Currently the Lawn Chichester CIL 3 Consider Chichest r District 299 Infrastru fields, indoor club have a Tennis Racquet Policy selecting if er Council cture sports tennis temporary dome Association, and Fitness High match funding pitches, courts structure Club funds, Club is identified as related build (Chichester covering some CDC grant this project and ) of their outdoor supports the children's courts during the growth of the play areas winter months. area provided This structure is it is for coming to the genuine end of its life community and a use. 79

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory permanent solution is sought. Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Football Local community £400,000 Sports CIL 4 Not selected Selsey r District 114 Infrastru fields, and Cricket requirements for match Dream Desir for IBP years Council cture sports clubhouse better facilities funding able 2016-2021 as pitches, available little planned related build development and in this cycle. children's play areas Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Developme Dependent upon Selsey CIL 4 Not selected Selsey r District 113 Infrastru fields, nt of better securing tenure Town Desir for IBP years Council cture sports facilities at of land from Council, able 2016-2021 as pitches, East Beach CDC, economic CDC little planned related build (showers, priority as would development and changing, create a number in this cycle. children's restaurant/c of local jobs. play areas afé, water Enhancements sports) in alignment with the East Beach Masterplan by CDC. To enhance visitor attraction and tourism product and foster better links. Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Provision of CDC Open 2014 Short £700k - Bourne CIL 4 Consider Southbo r District 305 Infrastru fields, Artificial Space, Sport & - term £1m From Community Desir selecting if urne Council cture sports Grass Recreation 2029 (2016 WSCC, College, able match funding pitches, Pitch/MUG Facilities Study - Developer WSCC, is identified as related build A 2013-2029. 2023) contributio Developer this project and (Southbour SPNP Pre-Sub ns, Sport contribution supports the children's ne) (links Plan Policy 8 England, s and Sport growth of the play areas with 304 & and Proposal 2 Bourne England area provided 306) Communit it is for y College genuine community use. Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Youth skate SPNP Pre-Sub 2014 Short £80k - WSCC, CIL 4 Consider Southbo r District 306 Infrastru fields, park Plan Proposal 2 - term £120k Developer Desir selecting if urne Council cture sports (Southbour 2029 (2016 From contribution able match funding pitches, ne) (links - WSCC, s and is identified as related build with 304 & 2023) Developer Parish this project and 305) contributio Council supports the children's ns, Parish growth of the play areas Council area provided it is for genuine community use. Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Provision of CDC Open 2014 Short £? From WSCC and CIL 4 Consider Southbo 80

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory r District 304 Infrastru fields, Youth Space, Sport & - term WSCC, developer Desir selecting if urne Council cture sports facilities Recreation 2029 (2016 Developer contribution able match funding pitches, (Southbour Facilities Study - contributio s is identified as related build ne) (links 2013-2029. 2023) ns this project and with 305 & SPNP Pre-Sub supports the children's 306) Plan Proposal 2 growth of the play areas area provided it is for genuine community use. Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Reserve Reduce £150,000 CIL and Sports CIL 4 Parish may Wisboro r District 323 Infrastru fields, football and pressure on the other Association/ Desir wish to ugh Council cture sports cricket village green. Parish able consider Green pitches, pitches Council funding from related build their CIL and children's play areas Chicheste IBP/ Green Playing Improveme Community 2016 Short £500,000 CIL and Sports CIL 4 Parish may Wisboro r District 322 Infrastru fields, nts or social and health - term other Association/ Desir wish to ugh Council cture sports rebuild of improvements 2021 (2016 Parish able consider Green pitches, Sports Current sports - Council funding from related build Association pavilion 2023) their CIL and Pavilion to inadequate – children's create needs updating play areas community sports facility Chicheste IBP/ Green Public open New Road, Butts Common 2015 Short CIL 4 Parish may Kirdford r District 320 Infrastru space Parking - term Desir wish to Council cture area and 2020 (2016 able consider SUDS pond - funding from and play 2023) their CIL area (Kirdford) Chicheste IBP/ Green Public open Establishm NPPF Section 8 2014 Short £? From Cost Southbourn CIL 3 Consider Southbo r District 307 Infrastru space ent and Promoting - term Developer unknown, e Parish Policy selecting if urne Council cture maintenanc Healthy 2029 (2016 contributio Sport Council High match funding e of an Communities, - ns, Sport England, is identified as accessible CDC Open 2023) England, Sustrans, this project Green Ring Space, Sport & Sustrans, WSCC, supports the around the Recreation WSCC Parish growth of the village of Facilities Study Council area provided Southbourn 2013-2029. it is for e, providing SPNP Pre-Sub genuine a variety of Plan Policies community green 2,3,7,8 and 9 use. infrastructur and proposal 2. e assets, Provision of including alternative informal informal open recreation/leisur 81

Org IBP Catego Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Priori Project Status Parish Name Id ry Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ty Area Other Categ ory space, e facilities allotments, a playing field, a footpath/cyc leway network, children’s play areas Chicheste IBP/ Utility Utility Fishbourne Improve the Utility CIL 4 Parish may Fishbour r District 212 Service services - Relocating environment and Companies Desir wish to ne Council s overhead enhance able consider services conservation funding from undergroun area character – their CIL d including settings of listed buildings. May also improve capacity to meet growth

West Sussex County Council Projects Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory West IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Green Links Existing local 2022 Mediu £250,00 WSCC CIL 4 Sussex 668 rt pedestrian across the horse riders are onwa m to 0 Desir County infrastructur Manhood. deterred from rds long able Council e (GLaM using term project). bridleways due (2023- Public to high volume 2029) bridleway of traffic on connection Vinnetrow between Road. Links bridleways can be created 192_1 and to benefit 2792 across cyclists Vinnetrow travelling Road. A to/from user Chichester, also controlled employees of crossing of local Vinnetrow businesses who Road is are known to possible but walk to work likely will be determined by Highways England review of A27 and 82

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory associated local network West IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Improve the The canal 2017- Short £170,00 WSCC CIL 4 Sussex 678 rt pedestrian surface of towpath is a 2022 term 0 Desir County infrastructur the popular route (2016- able Council e Chichester for access 2023) Canal to/from towpath for Chichester for walkers and walkers and cyclists cyclists. It is also designated part of NCN2. The pressure on the surface has increased greatly from extra use and needs improvement. West IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Provision of An ambition of 2022 Mediu £50,000 WSCC CIL 4 Sussex 674 rt pedestrian cycle and WSLAF. Will onwa m to Desir County infrastructur equestrian enhance the rds long able Council e link local off-road term between network for (2023- Keynor cyclists and 2029) Lane and equestrian to Highleigh and from along public Medmerry, so footpath 64 adding value to those works, supporting the local tourist economy and encouraging sustainable access West IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Provision of Will provide 2017- Short £100,00 WSCC CIL 4 Sussex 669 rt pedestrian public NMUs with 2022 term 0 Desir County infrastructur bridleway greater (2016- able Council e from B2145 connectivity in 2023) along public local network. footpath Route will also 190 to new allow horse A27 foot riders access to and cycle bridleways east bridge of B2145 which are currently inaccessible West IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Improve Upgrading 2017- Short £120,00 CIL 4 Sussex 676 rt pedestrian links FP251 to 2022 term 0 Desir County infrastructur between the bridleway would (2016- able Council e communitie provide cyclists 2023) s of and equestrians 83

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Hambrook a safer and alternative to Woodmanc the local road ote by network and upgrading safer access to FP251 to and from the bridleway South Downs National Park. WSLAF ambition. West IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Provision of Whilst a number 2022 Mediu £400,00 WSCC CIL 4 Birdham Sussex 675 rt pedestrian bridleway of routes for onwa m to 0 Desir and County infrastructur link cyclists have rds long able Mundha Council e between been term m South created/being (2023- Mundham created, these 2029) and are north-south. Birdham, There needs to possibly be an east - along west link. This existing could possibly public be achieved footpaths along FPs 44, 86, 85, 82 West IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Foot / cycle Shopwyke 2015 Short Directly S106 Developer S106 O/11/052 1 Committed Chichest Sussex 345 rt pedestrian bridge mitigation - term providin 83/OUT Critic er County infrastructur across the 2020 (2016- g al Council e A27 south 2023) of Portfield Roundabout West IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Hunston New Free 2018- Short WSCC S106 HN/15/03 3 Not selected Hunston Sussex 544 rt pedestrian Road cycle School being 2023 term 489/FUL Polic for IBP years and County infrastructur scheme - developed (2016- y 2016-2021 as North Council e shared use HN/15/03498/F 2023) High little planned Mundha pedestrian/c UL on Hunston development in m ycle path to Road. This this cycle. link the project will proposed provide an Highways important England sustainable link footbridge across the A27 at Whyke to the School roundabout and for with the development south of the south of the A27 A27 into the City. West IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Green links The creation of Phas Short £300,00 WSCC WSCC and S106 3 Not selected Manhoo Sussex 376 rt pedestrian across the such a route will e 1 - term 0 Integrated RSPB Polic for IBP years d County infrastructur Manhood. enhance the 2018- (2016- Works y 2016-2021 as Council e (GLaM visitor attraction 2019 2023) Programme High little planned project). of the local area 2017/18 & development in Pagham to by making the S106 this cycle. Medmerry area more 84

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Trail - accessible, provision of contributing to public tourism and footpath visitor numbers, and enhancing the permissive local economy. cycle route to B2145 to access track that circles the new Environmen tal Agency tidal bund. West IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Shared Shopwyke 2015 Short Directly S106 Developer S106 O/11/052 2 Committed Oving Sussex 347 rt pedestrian footway / mitigation - term providin 83/OUT Esse County infrastructur cycleway 2020 (2016- g ntial Council e along south 2023) side of A27 to new access to Shopwyke site West IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Foot / cycle Shopwyke 2015 Short Directly S106 Developer S106 O/11/052 1 Committed Oving, Sussex 346 rt pedestrian bridge mitigation - term providin 83/OUT Critic Westha County infrastructur across the 2020 (2016- g al mpnett Council e A27 to 2023) Coach Road West IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Green Links Part of route 2017- Short £100,00 WSCC CIL 4 Selsey Sussex 667 rt pedestrian across the already agreed 2022 term 0 Desir County infrastructur Manhood. via planning (2016- able Council e (GLaM consent to be 2023) project). dedicated North bridleway. Selsey to Remainder of Medmerry route is already Trail - public footpath provision of and needs public uplifting to bridleway bridleway route from status. Paddock Lane, along Golf Links Lane to access track that circles the new Environmen t Agency tidal bund 85

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory West IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Green links Development 2017- Short £300,00 Capital WSCC S106 EW/4016/ 4 Selsey, Sussex 666 rt pedestrian across the already 2022 term 0 Funding 05 Desir Brackles County infrastructur Manhood consented on (2016- EW/1795/ able ham and Council e (GLaM land north-east 2023) 07 East project) of Beech EW/5640/ Wittering Bracklesha Avenue. Use of 06 m to Clappers Lane EWB/627/ Medmerry for access 07 trail - to/from provision of Medmerry is not public attractive due to bridleway lane being route narrow and between carrying B2198 and increasing access vehicle traffic track that volume. circles the new Environmen t Agency tidal bund. West IBP/ Transpo Cycle Provision of Provide a 2017- Short £65,000 WSCC CIL 4 Sussex 670 rt infrastructur cycle route largely off-road 2022 term Desir County e between cycle link (2016- able Council Whitehouse between 2023) Farm Chichester and developmen entry to the t (west of South Downs Chichester) National Park and Salthill east of A286. Road West IBP/ Transpo Cycle Graylingwell Graylingwell 2015 Short Directly S106 Developer S106 CC/08/03 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 341 rt infrastructur cycle route mitigation - term providin 533/OUT Esse er County e 2 along 2020 (2016- g ntial Council north side of 2023) Westhampn ett Road (opp St James’ Road to connect with existing footpath rear of Story Road) West IBP/ Transpo Cycle City Centre To increase 2021 Short £250,00 WSCC CIL 2 Chichest Sussex 658 rt infrastructur cycle cycling for the term 0 Esse er County e parking. short trips to the (2016- ntial Council City Centre. 2023) West IBP/ Transpo Cycle St Paul’s Mitigation - to 2020 Mediu £140,00 S106 Developer S106 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 367 rt infrastructur cycle route reduce car trips + m to 0 Esse er County e from SDLs to long ntial Council city centre term 86

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory (2023- 2029) West IBP/ Transpo Cycle Gap-filling Chichester City 2020 Mediu £500,00 CIL WSCC CIL 3 Consider Chichest Sussex 358 rt infrastructur to complete Transport + m to 0 Polic selecting if er County e the Strategy – to long y match funding Council Chichester reduce short car term High is identified as Cycle trips to and from (2023- this project Network: the city centre 2029) supports the Whyke, growth of the Stockbridge area provided , it is for genuine Summersda community le, City use. Centre, south-west of the City Centre, east of the City Centre. West IBP/ Transpo Cycle Summersda Chichester City 2020 Mediu £230,00 CIL WSCC CIL 3 Consider Chichest Sussex 360 rt infrastructur le cycle Transport + m to 0 Polic selecting if er County e route Strategy – to long y match funding Council reduce short car term High is identified as trips to and from (2023- this project the city centre 2029) supports the growth of the area provided it is for genuine community use. West IBP/ Transpo Cycle Parklands Mitigation - to 2020 Mediu £440,00 S106 Developer S106 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 368 rt infrastructur cycle route reduce car trips + m to 0 Esse er County e from SDLs to long ntial Council city centre term (2023- 2029) West IBP/ Transpo Cycle Graylingwell Graylingwell 2015 Short Directly S106 Developer S106 CC/08/03 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 340 rt infrastructur cycle route mitigation - term providin 533/OUT Esse er County e 1 Wellington 2020 (2016- g ntial Council Road – 2023) Oaklands Way West IBP/ Transpo Cycle Portfield Chichester City 2020 Mediu £120,00 CIL WSCC CIL 2 Consider Chichest Sussex 359 rt infrastructur cycle route Transport + m to 0 Esse selecting if er County e Strategy – to long ntial match funding Council reduce short car term is identified as trips to and from (2023- this project the city centre 2029) supports the growth of the area provided it is for genuine community use.

87

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory West IBP/ Transpo Cycle Chichester - Mitigation - to 2020 Mediu £630,00 S106 Developer S106 TG/07/04 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 364 rt infrastructur Tangmere reduce car trips + m to 0 577/FUL; Esse er - County e cycle route from SDLs to long TG/11/04 ntial Tangme Council city centre term 058/FUL, re (2023- TG/12/01 2029) 1739/OUT , TG/14/00 797/FUL West IBP/ Transpo Cycle Provision of Provide a 2022 Mediu £150,00 WSCC CIL 4 Chichest Sussex 671 rt infrastructur cycle route largely off-road onwa m to 0 Desir er and County e between cycle link rds long able Lavant Council Summersda between term le and East Chichester and (2023- Lavant entry to the 2029) South Downs National Park east of A286. West IBP/ Transpo Cycle Oving cycle Shopwyke S106 Developer S106 O/11/052 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 540 rt infrastructur route mitigation 83/OUT Esse er and County e ntial Oving Council West IBP/ Transpo Cycle Selsey – To reduce short 2020 Mediu £200,00 CIL WSCC CIL 3 Not selected Manhoo Sussex 362 rt infrastructur Witterings car trips on + m to 0 Polic for IBP years d County e cycle route Manhood long y 2016-2021 as Peninsul Council term High little planned a (2023- development in 2029) this cycle. West IBP/ Transpo Cycle Chichester Chichester City 2020 Mediu TBC CIL WSCC CIL 2 Selected Manhoo Sussex 361 rt infrastructur – Selsey Transport + m to Esse d County e cycle route Strategy – to long ntial Peninsul Council reduce short car term a trips to and from (2023- the city centre 2029) West IBP/ Transpo Local road Cathedral Mitigation for 2020 Mediu £170,00 S106 Developer S106 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 371 rt network Way / Via West of + m to 0 Esse er County Ravenna Chichester SDL long ntial Council junction term improvemen (2023- t 2029) West IBP/ Transpo Local road North / Mitigation for 2020 Mediu TBC S106 Developer S106 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 366 rt network south link West of + m to Esse er County road and Chichester SDL long ntial Council improvemen term ts to nearby (2023- roads 2029) connecting with southern access to West of Chichester SDL 88

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory West IBP/ Transpo Local road Variable Chichester City 2020 Mediu £8,000 CIL WSCC CIL 3 Reserved for Chichest Sussex 356 rt network Message Transport + m to Polic next phasing er County Signing Strategy – to long y period Council (VMS) reduce traffic term High congestion (2023- 2029) West IBP/ Transpo Local road Southgate Chichester City 2020 Mediu £200,00 CIL WSCC CIL 2 Reserved for Chichest Sussex 357 rt network Gyratory Transport + m to 0 Esse next phasing er County junction Strategy – to long ntial period Council improvemen reduce traffic term t congestion and (2023- improve safety 2029) at key junctions West IBP/ Transpo Local road Sherborne Mitigation for 2020 Mediu £540,00 S106 Developer S106 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 370 rt network Road / St West of + m to 0 Esse er County Paul’s Road Chichester SDL long ntial Council junction term improvemen (2023- t 2029) West IBP/ Transpo Local road Oving Road Shopwyke S106 Developer S106 O/11/052 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 538 rt network crossroads mitigation 83/OUT Esse er County closure ntial Council West IBP/ Transpo Local road Kingsmead Graylingwell 2015 Short Directly S106 Developer S106 CC/08/03 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 344 rt network Avenue / mitigation - term providin 533/OUT Esse er County Palmers 2020 (2016- g ntial Council Field 2023) Avenue traffic manageme nt West IBP/ Transpo Local road Westhampn Graylingwell 2015 Short Directly S106 Developer S106 CC/08/03 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 343 rt network ett Road / mitigation - term providin 533/OUT Esse er County Portfield 2020 (2016- g ntial Council Way (nr 2023) Sainsbury's) junction improvemen t West IBP/ Transpo Local road Northgate Chichester City 2020 Mediu £986,00 CIL WSCC / CIL 2 Reserved for Chichest Sussex 352 rt network Gyratory Transport + m to 0 - CDC Esse next phasing er County junction Strategy – to long £1.6m ntial period Council improvemen reduce traffic term t congestion and (2023- improve safety 2029) at key junctions West IBP/ Transpo Local road Westhampn Chichester City 2019- Short £1.8m - CIL WSCC / CIL 2 Chichest Sussex 353 rt network ett Road/ St Transport 2020 term £2.1m CDC Esse er County Pancras/ Strategy – to (2016- ntial Council Spitalfield reduce traffic 2023) Lane/ St congestion and James improve safety Road at key junctions 89

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory double mini roundabout s junction improvemen t. To include improvemen ts to sustainable transport facilities along Westhampn ett Road. West IBP/ Transpo Local road Sherborne Mitigation for 2020 Mediu TBC S106 Developer S106 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 369 rt network Road traffic West of + m to Esse er County calming Chichester SDL long ntial Council term (2023- 2029) West IBP/ Transpo Local road Air Quality Details of District Sussex 372 rt network Action Plan project wide County measures – insufficient Council still investigatin g West IBP/ Transpo Local road A286 Chichester City 2015 Short £150,00 S106 WSCC / CIL 2 Committed Donning Sussex 349 rt network Birdham Transport - term 0 Developer Esse ton County Road / Strategy – to 2020 (2016- ntial Council B2201 reduce traffic 2023) (Selsey congestion and Tram improve safety Roundabout at key junctions ) junction improvemen t West IBP/ Transpo Local road B2145 / Chichester City 2020 Mediu £100,00 CIL WSCC / CIL 2 Not selected Hunston Sussex 363 rt network B2166 Transport + m to 0 Developer Esse for IBP years County junction Strategy – to long ntial 2016-2021 as Council improvemen reduce traffic term little planned t congestion and (2023- development in improve safety 2029) this cycle. at key junctions West IBP/ Transpo Local road Shopwyke Shopwyke 2015 Short Directly S106 Developer S106 O/11/052 2 Committed Oving Sussex 348 rt network Road mitigation - term providin 83/OUT Esse County diversion 2020 (2016- g ntial Council 2023) West IBP/ Transpo Local road A27/B2233 Project required WSCC Other 2 Tangme Sussex 724 rt network Nyton Rd as a result of Esse re County junction development in ntial Council improvemen Arun District t Cost £202,000 - £300,000 90

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory West IBP/ Transpo Local road Road link Mitigation for 2020 Mediu S106 Developer S106 2 Committed Tangme Sussex 365 rt network between Tangmere SDL + m to Esse re County A27 / A285 long ntial Council junction and term Tangmere (2023- Road 2029) West IBP/ Transpo Pedestrian Provision of Secure a new 2017- Short £10,000 WSCC CIL 4 Sussex 672 rt infrastructur footpath public access to 2022 term Desir County e linking East beach, which (2016- able Council Bracklesha otherwise is 2023) m Drive to only lawfully beach accessible from (opposite the car park at FP4) southern point of B2198. An ambition West Sussex Local Access Forum (WSLAF) West IBP/ Transpo Pedestrian Provision of An ambition of 2022 Mediu £60,000 WSCC CIL 4 Sussex 673 rt infrastructur public GLAM and onwa m to Desir County e bridleway WSLAF. Will rds long able Council along public support cycle term footpaths 75 connectivity of (2023- and 3662 seasonal 2029) visitors particularly to and from Medmerry, so supporting local economy West IBP/ Transpo Pedestrian Toucan Graylingwell 2015 Short Directly S106 Developer S106 CC/08/03 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 342 rt infrastructur crossing on mitigation - term providin 533/OUT Esse er County e Oaklands 2020 (2016- g ntial Council Way 2023) West IBP/ Transpo Public Extension/di Shopwyke 2015 Short S106 Developer S106 O/11/052 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 539 rt transport version of mitigation - term 83/OUT Esse er County number 55 2020 (2016- ntial Council bus route 2023) West IBP/ Transpo Public Chichester Chichester City 2020 Mediu TBC CIL WSCC / CIL 2 Reserved for Chichest Sussex 351 rt transport bus / rail Transport + m to CDC/ Esse next phasing er County interchange Strategy – to Depe long Stagecoach ntial period Council improvemen improve ndent term / Network ts (Cross sustainable on (2023- Rail reference transport mode nearb 2029) IBP/206) share y redev elop ment oppor tuniti es West IBP/ Transpo Public Bus lane Chichester City 2020 Mediu £1.2m CIL WSCC / CIL 3 Reserved for Chichest Sussex 354 rt transport along A259 Transport + m to CDC/ bus Polic next phasing er 91

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory County approaching Strategy – to long operators y period Council Bognor reduce short car term High Road trips to and from (2023- Roundabout the city centre 2029) West IBP/ Transpo Public Regular bus Mitigation for S106 Developer S106 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 542 rt transport services West of Esse er County between Chichester SDL ntial Council west of Chichester SDL and the City centre. West IBP/ Transpo Public Direct and Mitigation for S106 Developer S106 2 Committed Tangme Sussex 541 rt transport frequent Tangmere SDL Esse re County bus ntial Council services between Tangmere and Chichester City. West IBP/ Transpo Public Regular bus Mitigation for S106 Developer S106 2 Committed Westha Sussex 543 rt transport services Westhampnett Esse mpnett County between SDL ntial Council Westhampn ett SDL and the City centre. West IBP/ Transpo Smarter RTPI Chichester City 2020 Short £120,00 WSCC CIL 3 Consider Chichest Sussex 355 rt Choices screens at Transport + term 0 (12 Polic selecting if er County and key Strategy – to (2016- screens y match funding Council promote locations reduce short car 2023) ) High is identified as sustainable trips to and from this project modes of the city centre supports the transport growth of the area provided it is for genuine community use. West IBP/ Transpo Smarter Smarter To increase 2022- Short £80,000 S106 Developers S106 2 Chichest Sussex 682 rt Choices choices sustainable 2023 term / WSCC / Esse er County and Bike It travel choice (2016- CDC ntial Council promote project and modal shift 2023) sustainable for the journey modes of to school and transport linked to primary school programme and priorities identified through school travel planning (link to Safer Routes to 92

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory School) West IBP/ Transpo Smarter Smarter To increase 2020- Short £75,000 Developers S106 2 District Sussex 680 rt Choices choices sustainable 2021 term / WSCC / Esse wide County and Bike It travel choice (2016- CDC ntial Council promote project and modal shift 2023) sustainable for the journey modes of to school and transport linked to primary school programme and priorities identified through school travel planning (link to Safer Routes to School) West IBP/ Transpo Smarter Smarter To increase 2018- Short £60,000 Developers S106 2 Select for CIL District Sussex 350 rt Choices choices sustainable 2019 term / WSCC / Esse funding if the wide County and Bike It travel choice (2016- CDC ntial majority of Council promote project and modal shift 2023) money is sustainable for the journey match funded. modes of to school and This project transport linked to can primary school demonstrate it programme and can assist the priorities growth of the identified area. through school travel planning (link to Safer Routes to School) West IBP/ Transpo Smarter Smarter To increase 2019- Short £75,000 Developers S106 2 District Sussex 679 rt Choices choices sustainable 2020 term / WSCC / Esse wide County and Bike It travel choice (2016- CDC ntial Council promote project and modal shift 2023) sustainable for the journey modes of to school and transport linked to primary school programme and priorities identified through school travel planning (link to Safer Routes to School) West IBP/ Transpo Transport School To increase 2022- Short £50,000 WSCC CIL 2 Birdham Sussex 659 rt access sustainable 2023 term Esse , County improvemen travel choice (2016- ntial Earnley, Council ts - and modal shift 2023) East 93

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Manhood. for the journey Wittering Drop to and from and off/pick up school. Brackles arrangemen ham, ts at Selsey expanded and schools. West Wittering West IBP/ Transpo Transport School To increase 2021- Short £50,000 WSCC CIL 2 Bosham, Sussex 660 rt access sustainable 2022 term Esse Chidha County improvemen travel choice (2016- ntial m and Council ts - Bourne. and modal shift 2023) Hambro Drop for the journey ok, off/pick up to and from Southbo arrangemen school. urne and ts at Westbou expanded rne schools. West IBP/ Transpo Transport School To increase 2019- Short £50,000 WSCC CIL 2 Chichest Sussex 657 rt access sustainable 2020 term Esse er County improvemen travel choice (2016- ntial Council ts - and modal shift 2023) Chichester. for the journey Drop to and from off/pick up school. arrangemen ts at expanded schools. West IBP/ Transpo Transport Sustainable To increase 2019 Short £500,00 WSCC CIL 2 Chichest Sussex 656 rt Transport sustainable term 0 Esse er County Corridor - transport mode (2016- ntial Council City Centre share. 2023) to Portfield Considering and improvements improvemen to road space ts to allocation. sustainable transport facilities on Oving Road corridor. West IBP/ Transpo Transport Following To better Short 250,000 WSCC CIL 2 Chichest Sussex 654 rt recent Road manage term Esse er County Space demand for (2016- ntial Council Audit, area- parking and 2023) wide network parking management manageme aspirations (ie nt required sustainable in North mode priority) East for key routes in Chichester. the area).

94

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory West IBP/ Transpo Transport Following To better Short 250,000 WSCC CIL 2 Chichest Sussex 655 rt recent Road manage term Esse er County Space demand for (2016- ntial Council Audit, area- parking and 2023) wide network parking management manageme aspirations (ie nt required sustainable in West mode priority) Chichester. for key routes in the area). West IBP/ Transpo Transport Following To better Short WSCC CIL 2 Chichest Sussex 665 rt recent Road manage term Esse er City County Space demand for (2016- ntial Council Audit, area- parking and 2023) wide network parking management manageme aspirations (ie nt in sustainable Chichester mode priority) City. for key routes in the area). West IBP/ Transpo Transport - A27 To mitigate the 2020- Short S278 Highways S278 14/04284/ 1 Committed East Sussex 339 rt A27 improvemen area-wide 2023 term developers, England OUT Critic West County ts to six impacts of Local (2016- WSCC and al Corridor Council junctions: Plan housing 2023) Highways Fishbourne and England. (£2,5m), employment Stockbridge growth. (£3.8m), Whyke (£3.2m), Bognor Road (£1.8m), Portfield (£891,360) and Oving Road (£660,960). In addition, 2 further mitigation requirement s are A27/A259 Bognor Road roundabout (£595,000- £915,000). Updated design at A27/B2145 95

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory Whyke junction from Pagham developers without quoting costs. B2166/B214 5 roundabout at Hunston (£76,000- £113,000). Whyke junction, Chichester Free School scheme West IBP/ Educati Preschool For the west Require new WSCC CIL 2 Chichest Sussex 593 on and Primary of nursery Esse er County school Chichester classroom as ntial Council SDL 40 new the number of nursery nursery places places to be is dependent provided as upon national part of new requirements primary introduced school. through the Child Care Bill. West IBP/ Educati Primary, Expansion To meet 2022- Short £3 Basic WSCC / CIL 2 Select for CIL Birdham Sussex 332 on Secondary, of existing statutory duty to 2023 term million Needs academy Esse match funding , County sixth form primary ensure (2016- for half Grant will provider ntial as the WSCC Earnley, Council and special schools sufficient supply 2023) form need to be has a statutory East educational across the of school places entry secured to duty to provide Wittering needs Manhood for pupils Subject reduce the school places, and locality in arising from to funding subject to Brackles excess of new feasibilit required match funding. ham, 1/2 Form development y & site from CIL. Selsey Entry (mitigation) assess and ment West Wittering West IBP/ Educati Primary, Expansion To meet 2021- Short £3 Basic WSCC / CIL 2 Select for CIL Bosham, Sussex 331 on Secondary, of existing statutory duty to 2022 term million Needs academy Esse match funding Chidha County sixth form primary ensure (2016- for half Grant will provider ntial as the WSCC m and Council and special schools sufficient supply 2023) form need to be has a statutory Hambro educational across the of school places entry secured to duty to provide ok, needs Bourne for pupils Subject reduce the school places, Southbo locality in arising from to funding subject to urne and excess of new feasibilit required match funding. Westbou 1/2 Form development y & site from CIL. rne Entry (mitigation) assess ment

96

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory West IBP/ Educati Primary, Expansion To meet 2019- Short £3 Basic WSCC / CIL SB/14/02 2 Select for CIL Boxgrov Sussex 330 on Secondary, of existing statutory duty to 2020 term million Needs academy 800/OUT Esse match funding e, County sixth form primary ensure (2016- for half Grant will provider ntial as the WSCC Chichest Council and special school(s) sufficient supply 2023) form need to be has a statutory er, educational across the of school places entry secured to duty to provide Donning needs Chichester for pupils Subject reduce the school places, ton, locality by arising from to funding subject to Fishbour up to 1/2 new feasibilit required match funding. ne, Form Entry development y & site from CIL. Hunston (mitigation) assess and ment North Mundha m West IBP/ Educati Primary, School site To meet Temp Short £5.4 - S106 WSCC / S106 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 327 on Secondary, and statutory duty to orary term £6m &WSCC academy Esse er County sixth form provision of ensure acco (2016- (1Form (including provider ntial Council and special a new sufficient supply mmo 2023) Entry) Basic Need educational primary of school places datio £9.5- Grant) needs school for for pupils n to £10,6m the West of arising from be (2Form Chichester new provi Entry) SDL; 1 development ded Form Entry (mitigation) for initially but 2021. the site Acce should be ss to expandable clear to 2Form & Entry to unen accommoda cumb te the latter ered phases of site developmen for t 2024/ 25 openi ng. West IBP/ Educati Primary, Site for a 1 To meet 2018 Short £5.4 - S106 & WSCC / S106 2 Committed Chichest Sussex 329 on Secondary, Form Entry statutory duty to term £6m Basic Need academy Esse er County sixth form primary ensure (2016- (1Form Grant provider ntial Council and special school sufficient supply 2023) Entry) educational expandable of school places £9.5- needs to 2Form for pupils £10,6m Entry with arising from (2Form contribution new Entry) s towards a development new 1Form (mitigation) Entry primary school from Graylingwell site West IBP/ Educati Primary, Further To meet Rem Mediu £3 CIL & WSCC / CIL 2 Reserved for Kirdford, Sussex 333 on Secondary, expansion statutory duty to ainde m to million WSCC academy Esse next phasing Lynchm 97

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory County sixth form of existing ensure r of long for half (including provider ntial period ere, Council and special primary sufficient supply half term form Basic Need Loxwoo educational schools of school places form (2023- entry Grant) d, needs across the for pupils entry 2029) Subject Plaistow Billingshurst arising from expa to , Ifold locality by new nsion feasibilit and up to 1/2 development . y & site Wisboro Form Entry. (mitigation) assess ugh Wisborough ment Green Green primary school will be expanded by 5 places per year of age in September 2017. It is planned for Loxwood primary school to be expanded by 5 places per year of age in September 2018. Further places may be needed at Rudgwick primary school in 2019-2020 West IBP/ Educati Primary, School site To meet Temp Short £5.4 - S106 WSCC / S106 2 Committed Tangme Sussex 328 on Secondary, and statutory duty to orary term £6m &WSCC academy Esse re County sixth form provision of ensure acco (2016- (1Form (including provider ntial Council and special a new sufficient supply mmo 2023) Entry) Basic Need educational 1Form Entry of school places datio £9.5- Grant) needs primary for pupils n to £10,6m school for arising from be (2Form the new provi Entry) Tangmere development ded SDL; the (mitigation) for site should 2023. be Acce expandable ss to to 2Form clear Entry & unen cumb ered 98

Org IBP Categor Project Scheme Justification Phas Term Cost Funding Delivery CIL Planning Prior Project Parish Name Id y Type ing Time Range Sources Lead S106 Ref ity Status Area Other Cate gory site for 2026/ 27 openi ng. West IBP/ Social Libraries Library Development is Depe Mediu £75,000 CIL WSCC & CIL 3 Reserved for East Sussex 335 Infrastru provision as likely to create ndent m to - developer Polic next phasing West County cture part of a additional on long £100,00 y period Corridor Council new demand on the phasi term 0 High (west) community service (50% of ng of (2023- centre or population of com 2029) school for West Sussex munit the West of are members of y Chichester library service) centr SDL; to e or include scho shelving ol and a self- service terminal West IBP/ Social Libraries Library Development is Depe Mediu £75,000 CIL WSCC & CIL 3 Reserved for Tangme Sussex 336 Infrastru provision as likely to create ndent m to - developer Polic next phasing re County cture part of a additional on long £100,00 y period Council new demand on the phasi term 0 High community service (50% of ng of (2023- centre for population of com 2029) the West Sussex munit Tangmere are members of y SDL; to library service) centr include e shelving and a self- service terminal West IBP/ Green Flood and Parklands Primary benefit 2018- Short £500,00 WSCC 2 Chichest Sussex 711 Infrastru coastal Chichester of natural flood 2023 term 0 Esse er City County cture erosion risk daylighting attenuation/redu (2016- ntial Council manageme of culvert ce downstream 2023) nt with flood risk. landscaping Additional . benefits include improved amenity and biodiversity in the area. West IBP/ Public Waste Reconfigura Increase 2024- Mediu 5,000,0 WSCC CIL 2 Westha Sussex 710 and tion of capacity to 2029 m to 00 Esse mpnett County Commu Westhampn meet future long ntial Council nity ett transfer demand from term Service station/hous planned (2023- s ehold waste housing delivery 2029) recycling across the area. site 99

Infrastructure Commissioners Projects Ter Priorit CIL Org IBP Categor Project Phasi m Cost Funding Delivery Plan App y Project Parish Scheme Justification S106 Name Id y Type ng Tim Range Sources Lead Comment Categ Status Area Other e ory BT IBP/ Utility Utility Broadband Improve 2016 Sho Public and Openreach/ Other 3 Committed District Openreac 580 Services services roll out to business and rt commercial WSCC Policy Wide h 13,452 social ter funding High premises communication. m (100% of (20 premises) of 16- these 9,429 202 (70%) 3) connected to enable superfast fibre broadband connection. 2,372 (17.6%) connected to enable basic (between 2 and 24Mbps) fibre broadband connection. 726 premises (5.4%) built by commercial roll out or other county (cross border) Coastal IBP/ Health Community NHS To amalgamate In line Sho 3,300,000 £3,300,000 Coastal CIL 2 Select for East West 398 healthcare, Medical Chichester with rt total NHS West Essent CIL funding West Sussex primary care Centre West practices to phase ter sources/LIFT/t Sussex ial if the Corrid Clinical facilities & of cover 20 years 1 of m hird party Clinical majority of or Commissi improvemen Chichester ahead and to site (20 development Commissioni money is oning ts SDL accommodate develo 16- (£2m expected ng Group match Group new pment 202 to be funded funded. This residents/patient 3) by LIFT) project can s from planned demonstrate 100

Ter Priorit CIL Org IBP Categor Project Phasi m Cost Funding Delivery Plan App y Project Parish Scheme Justification S106 Name Id y Type ng Tim Range Sources Lead Comment Categ Status Area Other e ory developments it can assist the growth of the area. Environme IBP/ Green Flood and Bosham 73 households Indicat Med 460,000 FCRM Environment CIL 3 Selected Bosha nt Agency 396 Infrastru coastal Harbour new moved out of ive ium GiA/Contributi Agency Policy m cture erosion risk inland any one of the fundin to ons High managemen defences. four flood g - long t probability 2023- ter categories to a 2024 m lower one and £50,00 (20 moved out of the 0 and 23- very significant 2024- 202 or significant 2025 9) flood probability £150,0 categories 00 2025- 2026 £260,0 00 Network IBP/ Transpo Public Construction To reduce 2029 Med £55,000,00 Network Rail Chich Rail 629 rt transport of chord to congestion on ium 0 ester enable trains the roads to to run between Bognor long directly and Chichester, ter between although an m Bognor additional train (20 Regis and would lead to 23- Chichester, the barriers 202 rather than being down for 9) via an longer. interchange at Barnham. RSPB IBP/ Green Biodiversity New visitor This project will 2021- Med to be RSPB Other 3 Sidles 586 Infrastru measures centre at contribute to 2029 ium confirmed Policy ham cture Pagham achieving the to High Harbour first objective of long Local Nature Policy 22 and ter Reserve objective 3.27 of m the Local Plan. (20 23- 202 9) Southern IBP/ Utility Utility Upgrade to Essential for 2017 Sho Investment by Southern Other 1 Committed Tang Water 397 Services services Tangmere enabling level of rt Southern Water Critical mere Wastewater growth in new ter Water treatment Local Plan m Works (20 (WWTW) 16- 202 3) Sussex IBP/ Public Police and Mobile New housing will 2017- Sho £14,000 Sussex CIL 3 District Police 707 services emergency ANPR place an 2019 rt Police Policy wide services camera to increased ter High be fitted into demand upon m 101

Ter Priorit CIL Org IBP Categor Project Phasi m Cost Funding Delivery Plan App y Project Parish Scheme Justification S106 Name Id y Type ng Tim Range Sources Lead Comment Categ Status Area Other e ory fleet vehicle the existing level (20 of policing. In 16- the absence of 202 developer 3) contributions towards additional infrastructure, Sussex Police would be unable to retain the high level of policing that is currently delivered. Sussex IBP/ Public Police and Fixed site New housing will 2017- Sho £24,000 Sussex CIL 3 District Police 706 services emergency ANPR (with place an 2019 rt Police Policy wide services no increased ter High infrastructur demand upon m e in place) the existing level (20 of policing. In 16- the absence of 202 developer 3) contributions towards additional infrastructure, Sussex Police would be unable to retain the high level of policing that is currently delivered. Sussex IBP/ Public Police and 2 additional New housing will 2017- Sho £63,360 Sussex CIL 3 District Police 705 services emergency vehicles to place an 2019 rt Police Policy wide services increase increased ter High Chichester demand upon m fleet the existing level (20 capacity of policing. In 16- the absence of 202 developer 3) contributions towards additional infrastructure, Sussex Police would be unable to retain the high level of policing that is currently delivered. University IBP/ Transpo Car parking Multi level Replacement of tbc University to University Other University to Chich of 388 rt Car Park surface level car fund fund ester Chichester parking in the north of the 102

Ter Priorit CIL Org IBP Categor Project Phasi m Cost Funding Delivery Plan App y Project Parish Scheme Justification S106 Name Id y Type ng Tim Range Sources Lead Comment Categ Status Area Other e ory campus with a multi-level car park – the number of car spaces not increasing University IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Cycle ca £0.1m University to University CIL 3 Consider Chich of 386 rt pedestrian route/Footw fund part with Policy selecting if ester Chichester infrastructur ay with Local Authority High match e lighting CIL funding is extension identified as from the this project University supports the central area growth of to the area Graylingwell provided it is North for genuine community use. University IBP/ Transpo Cycle and Cycle ca £0.1m University to University CIL 3 University to Chich of 383 rt pedestrian route/Footw fund part with Policy fund ester Chichester infrastructur ay with Local Authority High e lighting to CIL the centre of the Campus University IBP/ Transpo Local road New Internal ca £0.5m University to University Other University to Chich of 384 rt network Campus fund but there fund ester Chichester Road and is a significant Link to funding gap Eastern Access Road University IBP/ Transpo Local road Eastern provided Assumed to HCA and S106 2 Committed Chich of 385 rt network Access by be funded by Linden LLP Essent ester Chichester Road HCA/Linde HCA and ial n LLP Linden LLP as a part of planning consent and S106 University IBP/ Transpo Local road College ca £300k No funding by WSCC S106 2 Committed Chich of 387 rt network Lane Traffic University Essent ester Chichester Calming/Ch defined ial ange - One Way access and Public Realm works to College Lane and Spitalfield Lane University IBP/ Educatio Further Academic To support 2017- Sho ca £5.9m University University Other University to Chich of 377 n education Teaching academic 2018 rt funded fund ester 103

Ter Priorit CIL Org IBP Categor Project Phasi m Cost Funding Delivery Plan App y Project Parish Scheme Justification S106 Name Id y Type ng Tim Range Sources Lead Comment Categ Status Area Other e ory Chichester and higher Building accommodation ter education and student m expansion (20 16- 202 3) University IBP/ Educatio Further On campus Student Depen Not known No detail as University Other University to Chich of 381 n education expansion of growth/studio dent as yet yet and possible fund ester Chichester and higher Fine Art space. Could on University local education building link with, fundin land and authority, including substitute other g maintenan private possible existing or ce contribution artists’ planned arts contributio studios provision n at nil cost University IBP/ Educatio Further Music To support 2016- Sho ca £3.5m University University Other University to Chich of 378 n education Teaching enhancement of 2017 rt funded fund ester Chichester and higher Building the academic ter education accommodation m and student (20 expansion 16- 202 3) University IBP/ Educatio Further Other To support Not known No detail as University Other University to Chich of 382 n education Academic enhancement of at present yet fund ester Chichester and higher and Support the academic education facilities - accommodation Learning and student Resource expansion Extension, Sports Building, Gymnasium, Students Union building extension University IBP/ Social Community Concert Hall This is a project Depen ca £5m. No University CIL 4 Consider Chich of 380 Infrastru facilities - On of local and dent plus commitments with local Desira selecting if ester Chichester cture Campus regional on University as yet but very authority, ble match high quality significance fundin land and clear there will lottery, Arts funding is Concert Hall strengthening g maintenan be a major Council for identified as for a Music the University’s ce funding gap. England and this project Conservatoir Conservatoire contributio private supports the e and for Music offer and n at nil cost donor growth of Community enabling the partners the area Use community to provided it is have a bespoke for genuine concert hall to community host an use. orchestra and have an audience capacity of ca 800 It also offers 104

Ter Priorit CIL Org IBP Categor Project Phasi m Cost Funding Delivery Plan App y Project Parish Scheme Justification S106 Name Id y Type ng Tim Range Sources Lead Comment Categ Status Area Other e ory opportunity

University IBP/ Green Playing Completion To provide subjec ca £1m University and University CIL 4 Consider Chich of 389 Infrastru fields, sports of running enhanced sports t to University gap funding Desira selecting if ester Chichester cture pitches, track/with facilities to fundin land and with local ble match related build internal all maintain the g maintenan authority/Lotte funding is and weather competitiveness packa ce ry/other identified as children's football pitch of sport/PE as ge contributio this project play areas one of the being n at nil cost supports the University’s core secure growth of academic d the area subject areas provided it is and to provide a for genuine unique community community use. facility for the City and possibly for schools. The all weather pitch could be used University IBP/ Green Playing Training/Cha To provide subjec ca £1.5m University and University CIL 4 Consider Chich of 390 Infrastru fields, sports nging enhanced sports t to University gap funding Desira selecting if ester Chichester cture pitches, Facilities facilities to fundin land and with local ble match related build maintain the g maintenan authority/Lotte funding is and competitiveness packa ce ry/other identified as children's of sport/PE as ge contributio this project play areas one of the being n at nil cost supports the University’s core secure growth of academic d the area subject areas provided it is and to provide a for genuine unique community community use. facility for the City and possibly for schools University IBP/ Utility Utility Carbon/Ren A scoping pre- tbc Not yet University, Partnership Other University to Chich of 392 Services services ewables feasibility study established local and fund ester Chichester Combined is currently authorities, University Heat and being completed NHS St Power with a view to Richard’s, project developing a utility CHP project on companies campus. It may and private be developed sector and benefit other major users such as the NHS St Richard’s and the Councils University IBP/ Utility Utility Water, A range of utility 2017- Sho Not known University, University Other University to Chich of 391 Services services drainage service 2018 rt as yet The utility fund ester 105

Ter Priorit CIL Org IBP Categor Project Phasi m Cost Funding Delivery Plan App y Project Parish Scheme Justification S106 Name Id y Type ng Tim Range Sources Lead Comment Categ Status Area Other e ory Chichester and power improvements and ter cost and companies to support are likely to be beyon m allocation and private the above required as a d (20 of costs to development part of the above 16- the s covering water, 202 University, drainage and 3) private power. partners and utility companies is still to be determined University IBP/ Housing Student Student Meeting current 2017/2 Sho ca £15m University/priv University Other University to Chich of 379 accommodat Residential - and forecast 018 rt ate funded fund ester Chichester ion Redevelopm need for on- ter ent of campus m Havenstoke accommodation (20 (252 new 16- units) and 202 redevelopm 3) ent of Hammond (77 new units)

106

Appendix B CIL Applicable Housing trajectory

Projected phasing of additional proposed housing sites of 6 or more dwellings

Projected housing development (dwellings per year) Total Total Total 2023- 2024- 2025- 2026- 2027- 2028- 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2018- 2023- 2018- 24 25 26 27 28 29 2023 2029 2029

East-West Corridor Bosham 0 0 0 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 50 50 Boxgrove 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 22 Chichester city - West of Chichester 0 100 150 150 200 200 100 100 100 100 50 600 650 1,250 - Westhampnett/NEC (part) 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 50 50 50 0 0 200 200 - Other identified sites 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 21 Chichester city total 0 100 171 150 200 200 150 150 150 150 50 621 850 1,471 Chidham & Hambrook 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 Fishbourne 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 15 Funtington (part) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lavant (part) 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 Oving (inc Shopwyke SDL) 0 40 40 20 0 0 0 0 0 50 35 100 85 185 Southbourne - Southbourne village 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Elsewhere in parish 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbourne total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tangmere (including SDL) 0 0 0 - Tangmere SDL 0 0 0 0 0 120 120 120 120 120 120 0 720 720 - Non-strategic NP sites 0 0 0 0 0 12 30 0 0 0 0 0 42 42 Tangmere total 0 0 0 0 0 132 150 120 120 120 120 0 762 762 West Thorney 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Westbourne 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 Westhampnett (part of SDL)4 0 50 50 50 50 50 50 0 0 0 0 200 100 300

Sub-total 22 210 261 220 250 434 375 270 270 320 205 963 1,874 2,837

Manhood Peninsula 0 0 0 Appledram 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107

Birdham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Donnington 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 21 Earnley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 East Wittering & Bracklesham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hunston 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 North Mundham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Selsey 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sidlesham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Itchenor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 West Wittering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total 0 0 0 21 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 21 7 28

Plan Area (North) 0 0 0 Lynchmere 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kirdford 0 32 0 0 13 15 0 0 0 0 0 45 15 60 Loxwood 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 17 Plaistow & Ifold 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 Wisborough Green 0 16 6 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 22 11 33 Sub-total 0 65 6 0 13 36 0 0 0 0 0 84 36 120

TOTAL 22 275 267 241 263 477 375 270 270 320 205 1,068 1,917 2,985

Table 4. Housing Trajectory showing potential CIL revenue from planned housing in Chichester Local Plan period to 2029 CIL revenue by parish - Comparison 2016 to 2017

Identified housing Identified housing Potential CIL revenue Potential CIL revenue Change in figures Parish1 potential potential (Nov 2016) (Nov 2017) 2016-2017 (Nov 2016) (Nov 2017)

East-West Corridor Bosham 50 50 £378,000 £378,000 £0 Boxgrove 22 22 £166,320 £166,320 £0 Chichester city - West of Chichester 1,250 1,250 £9,450,000 £9,450,000 £0 - Westhampnett/NEC (part) 200 200 £1,512,000 £1,512,000 £0 - Other identified sites 21 21 £158,760 £158,760 £0 - Chichester parish housing 0 0 £0 £0 £0 Chichester city total 1,471 1,471 £11,120,760 £11,120,760 £0 Chidham & Hambrook 0 10 £0 £108,000 £108,000 108

Fishbourne 15 15 £113,400 £113,400 £0 Funtington (part) 0 0 £0 £0 £0 Lavant (part) 0 10 £0 £75,600 £75,600 Oving (inc Shopwyke SDL) 85 185 £642,600 £1,398,600 £756,000 Southbourne - Southbourne village 125 0 £945,000 £0 -£945,000 - Elsewhere in parish 50 0 £378,000 £0 -£378,000 Southbourne total 175 0 1,323,000 0 -1,323,000 Tangmere (including SDL) - Tangmere SDL 1,000 762 £7,560,000 £5,443,200 -£2,116,800 - Non-strategic NP sites 42 0 £317,520 £317,520 £0 Tangmere total 1,042 762 £7,877,520 £5,760,720 -£2,116,800 West Thorney 0 0 £0 £0 £0 Westbourne 12 12 £129,600 £129,600 £0 Westhampnett (part of SDL) 300 300 £2,268,000 £2,268,000 £0 Sub-total 3,172 2,837 £24,019,200 £21,519,000 -£2,500,200 Manhood Peninsula Appledram 0 0 £0 £0 £0 Birdham 0 0 £0 £0 £0 Donnington 21 21 £279,720 £158,760 -£120,960 Earnley 0 0 £0 £0 £0 East Wittering & Bracklesham 110 0 £831,600 £0 -£831,600 Hunston 7 7 £75,600 £75,600 £0 North Mundham 0 0 £0 £0 £0 Selsey 0 0 £0 £0 £0 Sidlesham 0 0 £0 £0 £0 West Itchenor 0 0 £0 £0 £0 West Wittering 0 0 £0 £0 £0 Sub-total 138 28 £1,186,920 £234,360 -£952,560 Plan Area (North) Lynchmere 10 0 £126,000 £0 -£126,000 Kirdford 60 60 £756,000 £756,000 £0 Loxwood 60 17 £756,000 £214,200 -£541,800 Plaistow & Ifold 10 10 £126,000 £126,000 £0 Wisborough Green 33 33 £415,800 £415,800 £0 Sub-total 173 120 £2,179,800 £1,512,000 -£667,800

109

TOTAL 3,483 2,985 £27,385,920 £23,265,360 -£4,120,560

Table 5: Potential parish level CIL receipts assuming adopted neighbourhood plans (25% of CIL receipts)

Neigh Parish bourh CIL 2024- 2025- 2026- 2027- Total Total Total 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2028-29 ood contribut 25 26 27 28 2018-2023 2023-2029 2018-2029 plan1 ion

East-West Corridor £47,25 Bosham Yes 0.25 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £47,250 0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £94,500 £94,500 Boxgrove No 0.15 £24,948 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £24,948 £0 £24,948 Chichester city £113,40 £170,10 £170,10 £226,80 £226,80 £113,4 £113,4 £113,4 £113,4 - West of Chichester No 0.15 £0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 £56,700 £680,400 £737,100 £1,417,500 - Westhampnett/NEC No 0.15 £56,70 £56,70 £56,70 £56,70 (part) £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 0 0 0 0 £0 £0 £226,800 £226,800 - Other identified No 0.15 sites £0 £0 £23,814 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £23,814 £0 £23,814 £113,40 £193,91 £170,10 £226,80 £226,80 £170,1 £170,1 £170,1 £170,1 Chichester city total £0 0 4 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 £56,700 £704,214 £963,900 £1,668,114 Chidham & Yes 0.25 Hambrook £0 £27,000 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £27,000 £0 £27,000 Fishbourne Yes 0.25 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £28,350 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £28,350 £28,350 Funtington (part) No 0.15 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Lavant (part) Yes 0.25 £0 £18,900 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £18,900 £0 £18,900 Oving (inc £56,70 No 0.15 Shopwyke SDL) £0 £45,360 £45,360 £22,680 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 0 £39,690 £113,400 £96,390 £209,790 Southbourne - Southbourne Yes 0.25 village £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 - Elsewhere in Yes 0.25 parish £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Southbourne total £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Tangmere (including

SDL) £226,80 £226,8 £226,8 £226,8 £226,8 £1,360,80 - Tangmere SDL Yes 0.25 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 0 00 00 00 00 £226,800 £0 0 £1,360,800 - Non-strategic NP £56,70 Yes 0.25 sites £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £22,680 0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £79,380 £79,380 £249,48 £283,5 £226,8 £226,8 £226,8 £1,440,18 Tangmere total £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 0 00 00 00 00 £226,800 £0 0 £1,440,180 West Thorney No 0.15 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Westbourne Yes 0.25 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £32,400 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £32,400 £32,400 Westhampnett (part £39,80 2 No 0.15 of SDL) £0 £39,800 £39,800 £39,800 £39,800 £39,800 0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £159,200 £79,600 £238,800 110

E-W Corridor sub- £244,46 £279,07 £232,58 £266,60 £624,08 £540,6 £396,9 £396,9 £453,6 £1,047,66 £2,735,32 total £24,948 0 4 0 0 0 50 00 00 00 £323,190 2 0 £3,782,982 Manhood

Peninsula Appledram No 0.15 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Birdham Yes 0.25 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Donnington No 0.15 £0 £0 £0 £23,814 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £23,814 £0 £23,814 Earnley No 0.15 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 East Wittering & No 0.15 Bracklesham £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Hunston No 0.15 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £11,340 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £11,340 £11,340 North Mundham No 0.15 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Selsey Yes 0.25 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Sidlesham No 0.15 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 West Itchenor No 0.15 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 West Wittering No 0.15 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Manhood Pen sub- total £0 £0 £0 £23,814 £0 £11,340 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £23,814 £11,340 £35,154

Plan Area (North) Lynchmere No 0.15 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £100,80 Kirdford Yes 0.25 £0 0 £0 £0 £40,950 £47,250 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £141,750 £47,250 £189,000 Loxwood Yes 0.25 £0 £53,550 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £53,550 £0 £53,550 Plaistow & Ifold No 0.15 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £18,900 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £18,900 £18,900 Wisborough Green Yes 0.25 £0 £50,400 £18,900 £0 £0 £34,650 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £69,300 £34,650 £103,950 Plan Area (N) sub- £204,75 £100,80 total £0 0 £18,900 £0 £40,950 0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £264,600 £100,800 £365,400 PLAN AREA £449,21 £297,97 £256,39 £307,55 £736,22 £540,6 £396,9 £396,9 £453,6 £1,336,07 £2,847,46 TOTAL £24,948 0 4 4 0 0 50 00 00 00 £323,190 6 0 £4,183,536

Notes: 1 Identifies parishes where there is a made Neighbourhood Plan already in place, or a draft Neighbourhood Plan at an advanced stage of preparation that is expected to be made before the projected date for CIL receipts. Parishes that have made a Neighbourhood Plan receive 25% of total CIL receipts from new development in their area, whereas parishes with no Neighbourhood Plan receive 15% of CIL receipts (capped at £100 per existing Council tax dwelling each year). 2 Annual CIL receipts for Westhampnett Parish will potentially be capped at £100 per existing Council tax dwelling (currently £39,800 per year) unless a Neighbourhood Plan is made before the projected date for CIL receipts.

111

Table 7. Potential total CIL receipts from additional proposed housing sites of 6 or more dwellings

Assumed average dwelling size (internal floor area) = 90 sq.m 30% affordable housing (CIL exempt) is assumed for developments of 6+ dwellings in designated rural parishes and for 11+ dwellings elsewhere CIL contribution per dwelling - South of Plan area £10,800 - North of Plan area £18,000 Projected additional CIL receipts

2018- 2021- 2024- 2025- Total Total Total 2019-20 2020-21 2022-23 2023-24 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 % 19 22 25 26 2018-2023 2023-2029 2018-2029 CIL rate AH East-West

Corridor £189,00 £189,0 Bosham £10,800 30% £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 0 00 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £378,000 £378,000 £166,3 Boxgrove £10,800 30% 20 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £166,320 £0 £166,320 Chichester city - West of £756,00 £1,134,0 £1,134 £1,512,00 £1,512,0 £756,0 £756,0 £756,00 £756,00 £10,800 30% Chichester £0 0 00 ,000 0 00 00 00 0 0 £378,000 £4,536,000 £4,914,000 £9,450,000 - Westhampn £10,800 30% ett/NEC £378,0 £378,0 £378,00 £378,00 (part) £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 00 00 0 0 £0 £0 £1,512,000 £1,512,000 - Other identified £10,800 30% £158,76 sites £0 £0 0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £158,760 £0 £158,760 Chichester £756,00 £1,292,7 £1,134 £1,512,00 £1,512,0 £1,134 £1,134 £1,134,0 £1,134,0 city total £0 0 60 ,000 0 00 ,000 ,000 00 00 £378,000 £4,694,760 £6,426,000 £11,120,760 Chidham & £108,00 £10,800 0% Hambrook £0 0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £108,000 £0 £108,000 £113,40 Fishbourne £10,800 30% £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £113,400 £113,400 Funtington £10,800 30% (part) £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Lavant (part) £10,800 30% £0 £75,600 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £75,600 £0 £75,600 Oving (inc Shopwyke £10,800 30% £302,40 £302,40 £151,2 £378,00 SDL) £0 0 0 00 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 0 £264,600 £756,000 £642,600 £1,398,600 Southbourn e - Southbourn £10,800 30% e village £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 - Elsewhere £10,800 30% in parish £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Southbourn e total £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 112

Tangmere (including SDL) - Tangmere £907,20 £907,2 £907,2 £907,20 £907,20 £10,800 30% SDL £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 0 00 00 0 0 £907,200 £0 £5,443,200 £5,443,200 - Non- strategic NP £10,800 30% £226,8 sites £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £90,720 00 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £317,520 £317,520 Tangmere £997,92 £1,134 £907,2 £907,20 £907,20 total £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 0 ,000 00 0 0 £907,200 £0 £5,760,720 £5,760,720 West £10,800 30% Thorney £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £129,60 Westbourne £10,800 0% £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £129,600 £129,600 Westhampn ett (part of £10,800 30% £378,00 £378,00 £378,0 £378,00 £378,0 SDL) £0 0 0 00 £378,000 0 00 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,512,000 £756,000 £2,268,000 E-W Corridor £166,3 £1,620,0 £1,973,1 £1,663 £1,890,00 £3,319,9 £2,835 £2,041 £2,041,2 £2,419,2 £1,549,80 sub-total 20 00 60 ,200 0 20 ,000 ,200 00 00 0 £7,312,680 £14,206,320 £21,519,000 Manhood

Peninsula Appledram £10,800 30% £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Birdham £10,800 30% £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £158,7 Donnington £10,800 30% £0 £0 £0 60 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £158,760 £0 £158,760 Earnley £10,800 30% £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 East Wittering & £10,800 30% Bracklesha m £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Hunston £10,800 0% £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £75,600 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £75,600 £75,600 North £10,800 30% Mundham £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Selsey £10,800 30% £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Sidlesham £10,800 30% £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 West £10,800 30% Itchenor £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 West £10,800 30% Wittering £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 Manhood Pen sub- £158,7 total £0 £0 £0 60 £0 £75,600 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £158,760 £75,600 £234,360 Plan Area

(North) £0 £0 £0

Lynchmere £18,000 30% £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £403,20 £189,00 Kirdford £18,000 30% £0 0 £0 £0 £163,800 0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £567,000 £189,000 £756,000 £214,20 Loxwood £18,000 30% £0 0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £214,200 £0 £214,200 Plaistow & £126,00 £18,000 30% Ifold £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £126,000 £126,000 Wisborough £18,000 30% £0 £201,60 £75,600 £0 £0 £138,60 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £277,200 £138,600 £415,800 113

Green 0 0 Plan Area (N) sub- £819,00 £453,60 total £0 0 £75,600 £0 £163,800 0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £0 £1,058,400 £453,600 £1,512,000 PLAN AREA £166,3 £2,439,0 £2,048,7 £1,821 £2,053,80 £3,849,1 £2,835 £2,041 £2,041,2 £2,419,2 £1,549,80 TOTAL 20 00 60 ,960 0 20 ,000 ,200 00 00 0 £8,529,840 £14,735,520 £23,265,360

114

APPENDIX C

CIL Infrastructure Prioritisation This section sets out the approach to prioritise projects to be funded via CIL. It draws upon the evidence base and Regulation 123 list that supported adoption of the CIL Charging Schedule. The approach taken within the IBP is reviewed and updated on an annual basis, to ensure appropriate categorisation of projects against the development trajectory.

The Need to Prioritise Infrastructure Chichester District Council recognises that the ability to fund required infrastructure is based upon the anticipated CIL cash flow. It is unlikely that CIL receipts will be sufficient to fund all infrastructure required within the plan area. It is therefore necessary to prioritise the infrastructure projects in most need of CIL funding, and to begin to identify and understand the requirements for additional funding towards particular projects.

This IBP represents the outcome of a considered approach to delivery that will effectively manage the demand and call on resources. In addition to agreement between stakeholders that have informed this IBP, it is critical that delivery partners recognise the importance of this plan and play their part in ensuring that the infrastructure for which they are responsible is delivered on time.

The document aligns infrastructure requirements with the most up to date housing trajectory and anticipated CIL receipts. At all stages the relationship between plan-wide, area based, and City, Town, and Parish Council projects will be critical and may need coordination.

The role of CIL in providing mitigating infrastructure as well as supporting viability of key development sites is recognised and therefore the strategic direction of prioritised spend is central to the IBP process.

The Approach towards Infrastructure Prioritisation Establishing a detailed understanding of infrastructure delivery is multi-faceted and requires consideration of a number of inter- dependent factors:

 The Development Trajectory  Prioritisation of Infrastructure Projects  Phasing of infrastructure

The Development Trajectory Infrastructure delivery is aligned to growth and necessary to mitigate the impacts arising from development. It is imperative that the phasing of infrastructure represents current development agreements and anticipated trajectories moving forward.

The Local Plan sets the strategic spatial planning framework for the Chichester plan area, detailing a development strategy up to 2029 and the local context for considering the long-term social, economic, environmental and resource impacts of development.

115

Policy 4 of the Local Plan sets out a target of 7,388 homes to be built from 2012 to 2029. This IBP is informed by the detailed development trajectories that are anticipated to deliver this growth and will need to remain reviewed in accordance with future agreements and trajectories. The Monitoring Framework implemented by CDC will be central to this process and ensure achieved and anticipated growth directly informs the IBP.

Prioritisation of Infrastructure Projects Following the identification of all currently identified Infrastructure Projects (for the whole plan period set out in Appendix A and for the first five years in Section 3) the IBP seeks to align each project a level of priority. This will distinguish those projects critical to enabling development and mitigating infrastructure compared to those that are important to deliver good place making principles, but would be appropriate to deliver at a later date.

Table 1: Infrastructure Prioritisation Categories Category Definition Critical Infrastructure Infrastructure that must happen to enable growth, i.e. it is a prerequisite to unlock any future works without which development cannot proceed. These infrastructure items are ‘blockers’ or ‘showstoppers’, they are most common in relation to transport and utilities infrastructure and are usually linked to triggers controlling the commencement of development activity. It also includes Services that are required to facilitate growth or be delivered in advance of residential/commercial development, i.e. connection to the potable and wastewater network. Essential Infrastructure Infrastructure that is considered necessary in order to mitigate impacts arising from the operation of the development. These are projects which are usually identified as required mitigation in EIA/SEA/HRA/TIA testing to make the proposed development acceptable in planning terms and are directly related to the proposed development. These items are most common in relation to trips and population generated by the development (including school places, health requirements and public transport (service Projects), and are usually linked to triggers controlling the occupation of development sites. Policy High Priority Infrastructure that is required to support wider strategic or site specific objectives which are set out in Infrastructure planning policy or subject to a statutory duty, but would not necessarily prevent development from occurring. This type of infrastructure has a less direct relationship with additional population creating additional need, and is more influenced by whether a person chooses to use this facility or service (including use of community facilities and libraries and use of sports facilities). Desirable Infrastructure Infrastructure that is required for sustainable growth but is unlikely to prevent development in the short to medium term. This is often aligned to placemaking objectives without being essential for development to come forward.

Within the categories outlined above, further refinement could be used in order to evaluate and compare projects within each category which would influence the priorities. These could include factors such as:

116

 Whether neighbouring parishes are prepared to act as a cluster and pool their CIL monies to fund infrastructure projects of mutual benefit to them  Value for money (or return on investment)  Number of jobs created  Number of homes provided  Deliverability and sustainability (whether the project is “ready to go”)  Risk  Other Identified funding sources to contribute towards CIL projects  Existing infrastructure capacity.  Direct links to the Local Plan Vision /policies (key outcomes for growth)  Alignment with delivery partners plans/programmes  Whether the project could be delivered another way/or through another source of funding  Whether the project will lead to efficiencies.  Evidence of need

The final element that supports the prioritisation of infrastructure is to ensure an appreciation of the necessary phasing of infrastructure requirements. It is this stage that is central to the Infrastructure Business Plan as it represents the primary evidence base for anticipating cash-flow from infrastructure spending against the receipt of CIL Payments.

The infrastructure prioritisation process is illustrated in the diagram below:

117

Infrastructure Prioritisation Process Note: At all stages consideration must be given towards funding sources/options

1. Is the infrastructure 2. Record infrastructure as committed already committed Yes in the Business Plan & recognise it with full funding will not impact cash flow modelling secured?

No

7. Reconsider the request for infrastructure

3. Is the infrastructure necessary No to support the development

trajectories?

No

6. Will the infrastructure support Yes 5. Is the infrastructure economic prosperity &/or No required on the basis of No provide wider placemaking Statutory planning/duties? benefits? 4. If the infrastructure is necessary to unlock & enable development classify as

critical. If it mitigates development

impact then classify as Essential Yes Yes mitigation

Essential Critical Policy High Priority Desirable Mitigation

118

Implementation, Monitoring & Governance

Introduction A clear framework and shared understanding of infrastructure priorities between delivery partners will be required to effectively implement and monitor spend and receipt of CIL monies. The IBP sets out the relationship between the development trajectory and infrastructure provision to provide a pro-active approach in mitigating the pressures arising from growth. The IBP seeks to identify the funding gap that exists and the requirement to identify additional funding sources as well as consideration of alternative options for delivery and implementation.

The IBP is a ‘living’ document and will be consistently reviewed in order to respond to emerging development proposals and growth requirements. As noted previously the IBP does not therefore represent an exhaustive list of defined projects but is a reflection of the current understanding that is expected to be refined with additional projects or amendments that reflect alternative approaches to project delivery under future IBPs.

The community at large, the development industry and infrastructure delivery commissioners will benefit from greater certainty about what infrastructure will be provided and its timing.

CIL Governance Implementation of the IBP and effective allocation of CIL receipts requires a clear governance structure to facilitate effective delivery and monitoring. The IBP Joint Member Liaison group was established on 2 June 2015 by CDC Cabinet. Its purpose is to consider and endorse the draft Chichester Infrastructure Business Plan (IBP) on an annual basis.

The IBP identifies funding sources and responsible delivery agencies in order to support the development growth identified in the Local Plan to 2029. The IBP is drafted by a joint CDC/WSCC officer working group. The Joint Member Liaison Group considers the draft for stakeholder consultation and then recommends the final version in the light of that consultation.

Membership is open to elected members of WSCC and CDC. It was agreed that the joint member liaison Group would not be a formal decision-making joint committee and so it would not be necessary that the two councils should have equality of representation. It would be for each Council to determine its mix of executive and non-executive members without being so large as to be unwieldy. Chichester has appointed the Leader of the Council the Cabinet Member for Housing and Planning and a member from the Development Plan and Infrastructure Panel. WSCC has appointed two of its members from Chichester District, one of whom is the leader of the Council.

The member liaison group will meet each September to consider and endorse the draft IBP for consultation with stakeholders, including developers, infrastructure providers and parish councils. It would then meet again in December to make any amendments resulting from the consultation. CIL Regulation 59C states that a local council (Town, City, Parish Council) must use CIL receipts passed onto it in accordance with regulation 59A or 59B to support the development of the local council’s area, or any part of that are, by funding – (a) the provision,

119 improvement, replacement, operation or maintenance of infrastructure; or (b) anything else that is concerned with addressing the demands that development places on an area.

The City, Town and Parish Councils should note that if they have not spent the CIL allocations made to them within five years of receipt the District Council will ask for the monies back (see CIL Regulation 59E(10) for details). The exception to this is where a City, Town or Parish Council has identified ‘up front’ the need to fund an infrastructure project, where the CIL contributions accrued within the five year period are insufficient to fund the project, but it can be demonstrated that there is a realistic prospect of the project being delivered during the timeframe of the Local Plan.

If the City, Town or Parish Council does not feel that it has the necessary experience to manage their proportion of the CIL spend, it is imperative that they indicate this to the District Council at the earliest opportunity. In this is the case, the District Council would reserve the option to make a charge for managing the CIL on their behalf.

Final decisions on the allocation of CIL would then be made by CDC Full Council on the recommendation of Cabinet, in accordance with the endorsed IBP and as part of the process of preparing and approving the Council’s own revenue budget and capital programme.

The Council’s capital programme would include the District Council’s own infrastructure provision and planned payments of CIL towards the infrastructure of other Infrastructure Delivery Commissioners. It would not include infrastructure of other providers fully funded from other sources such as S106. It would be for Infrastructure Delivery Commissioners to manage cash flow for their infrastructure provision, including before CIL is paid over.

If the need arises for major changes to the IBP to be made outside the decision-making cycle, the Joint Member Liaison Group will be consulted and CDC’s normal decision making procedure can be followed

Monitoring The IBP will be monitored through the Authority’s Local Plan Monitoring Report, published annually in December. This will include a record of payments through S106 and CIL, as well as tracking development. The IBP will also be subject to scrutiny from the Corporate Governance and Audit Committee.

The Governance structure, process and timeline for the production of the first IBP is set out in the diagram below.

120

INFORMATION GATHERING PLANNING & PRIORITISATION STRATEGY ENDORSEMENT DECISIONS

LOCATIONAL GROUPS – Identify, plan, prioritise & sequence infrastructure within locational groupings

STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTU CDC & WSCC CDC LOCATIONS RE JOINT CABINET (Masterplans)

ilities BUSINESS MEMBER Approves Developers PLAN LIAISON Infrastructur Infrastructure Delivery CHICHESTER DISTRICT

Commissioners (IDCs) Identifies GROUP e Business COUNCIL

Parish Councils infrastructure Considers/ Plan & Approves budget & District & County Councillors requirements endorses recommends allocation of CIL for Local Plan, & Draft Council to L all funding Infrastructure approve CDC/WSCC sources. Profiles Business Plan funding EAST/WEST CORRIDOR (outside SDLs) OFFICER & prioritises for (1 group or 2?) GROUP CMT delivery & stakeholder Developers Prepares spending in line consultation &

IDCs Infrastructure with housing after District & County Councillors AUTHORITY’S Business Plan trajectory consultation Parish Councils MONITORING recommends (Neighbourhood Plans) based on, but REPORT challenging, any changes for Cabinet work of

THEMATICGROUPS approval MANHOOD locational & Developers thematic SCRUTINY & IDCs District & County Councillors groups, & Duty STAKEHOLDER ACCOUNTABILITY CDC Corporate Parish Councils to Cooperate CONSULTATION (Neighbourhood Plans) on cross- Governance & boundary Audit Committee monitors & infrastructure NORTH OF PLAN AREA scrutinises delivery informationin the IDP &provide evidence for the evaluationmethodology Developers

vidence a wide from rangeof sources (e.g. masterplans& Capital programmes) &update of IBP & use of IDCs receipts District & County Councillors

Parish Councils Reviewe

Transport,Education, Health, Social Infrastructure, Green Infrastructure, Emergency Services, Ut (Neighbourhood Plans) Programme Management & alignment including SLA’s with delivery partners as contracts are let

APRIL – JUNE JULY SEPT 2015 OCT/DEC FEB MARCH 121

Appendix D Funding Source Review

This appendix examines the types of additional funding which could be accessed alongside the CIL confirmed income projections in order to help meet the outstanding costs identified in paragraph 6.4. This section examines:

 The main organisations with access to funding;  Funding access through the LEP (The Coast to Capital Local Enterprise Partnership);  Other sources of funding relevant to key themes of project identified in paragraph 3.6 (Transport, Utilities and Education); and  Potential future funding sources.

Main organisations with access to funding Chichester District Council The main services provided by the District Council include: Environmental health Housing Leisure and recreation Planning applications Waste collection

The Council’s Corporate Plan is a strategic document that sets out the Council’s Themes and Aims and provides a basis for us to plan our work. It does not cover everything that we do or all the services that we provide, but seeks to focus on those issues that matter most to people, national priorities set by the Government and local challenges arising from the social, economic and environmental context of the district.

The themes are as follows:  Improve the provision of and access to suitable housing  Support our communities  Manage our built and natural environments  Improve and support the local economy

122

West Sussex County Council

West Sussex County Council (WSCC) is responsible for providing many key local services. Each year the council manages public money in the provision of these services including schools, social services, Fire & rescue, the local highway network, libraries and the public records office, trading standards, transport planning and waste management.

WSCC is the local highway authority responsible for delivering the majority of the transport-related infrastructure to support the Local Plan proposals.

The County Council is seeking revenue funding from its capital programme to undertake feasibility work to progress the development of a Chichester Area Transport Package (subject to cabinet member approval).

The Coast to Capital Local Enterprise Partnership

The Coast to Capital LEP’s vision for its region is a high performing economy with a global outlook, where knowledge and creativity drives growth and prosperity for all. Its strategic approach is to:  Create and maintain the right conditions for enterprise and high growth entrepreneurship to flourish;  Ensure all young people emerging from each phase of education are ambitious and equipped with or seeking entrepreneurial skills;  Make Coast to Capital an attractive location to start and grow a business;  Promote social enterprises as effective forms of business for a wider group of potential entrepreneurs than has previously been considered; Ensure there is a healthy enterprise and dynamic entrepreneurial activity across our region;  Add extra momentum to our economy by supporting those sectors and businesses which are capable of growing most quickly.

Funding accessed through the LEP

Growth Deal

Coast to Capital LEP has signed a Growth Deal with central government that will see the start of a six year investment programme in jobs, infrastructure and transport. The deal is worth £202 million over six years, starting with investment of £38m of new funding in 2015/16 and it will deliver by 2021 14,000 jobs, 5,000 new homes and 190,000 sqm of employment space.

As a whole, during the period starting in 2015, the Coast to Capital region will benefit from:

 Wood Fuel initiative with the Forestry Commission – Sustainable use of primary natural resource to produce wood fuel as a renewable energy source and local building materials. Up to £0.8m. 123

 Digital Growth – to provide key business locations with the digital connections needed to compete internationally and to pioneer new mobile 5G technology research with neighbouring LEPs. Support to small firms to get e-commerce skills and complete the superfast broadband roll-out. Up to £3.4m.  Advanced Engineering Centre – a collaboration between the University of Brighton and Ricardo in a new Centre of excellence to deliver leading automotive and environmental engineering training and research. Ricardo is a global strategic, technical and environmental engineering firm based in Shoreham. Up to £7m.  Flood Defences Newhaven and Shoreham - In Newhaven, this will open up major brownfield sites for housing and employment land plus new harbour facilities. In Shoreham, the flood defences and transport access improvements will allow land to be used for housing and businesses. £1.5m in Newhaven and £9.5m in Shoreham.  Bognor Regis A29 re-alignment between the new Bognor Regis Relief Road and the A27 which will bridge the West Coastway railway line, avoiding congestion points and current delay points at a level crossing. It will include 4 to 5 new junctions, plus cycle and pedestrian facilities. The realignment will allow new development of business and employment opportunities in Bognor Regis. Up to £13m.  Circus Street, central Brighton - a city centre mixed use regeneration project of a site to deliver new homes, office building, student accommodation, a library and academic buildings. Up to £2.7m.  Preston Barracks Central Research Laboratory - a joint venture between University of Brighton, Cathedral and Brighton Council to create a new innovation hub to commercialise academic research and incubate high growth businesses, with new housing. £7.7m  City College Brighton and Hove and Chichester College - Refurbishment of dilapidated buildings and facilities to allow an increase in trainees, apprentices, disabled learners and new links to local businesses. £11m in 2015/16 with a further round for new projects of £10m in 2016/17.  Sustainable Transport Packages – a range of projects will tackle congestion and improve sustainable transport in local areas across the Coast to Capital region. This will enable improvements to walking and cycling links; improvements to junctions and traffic management systems to ease traffic flow and reduce congestion and improvements to public transport, such as bus and taxi priority measures and better Interchanges. £31.7m.  Crawley Area Transport Package - Includes junction improvements, bus priority schemes, modal interchange and improvements to walking and cycling. £18m.  Resilience Schemes - Intelligent Transport System traffic management, strategic road maintenance and flood and critical incident alleviation, mainly in East Surrey. £30.9m.

Growing Places Fund

Coast to Capital has a portfolio of projects funded by the Growing Places Fund that will create or unlock job creation. The Growing Places Fund is designed to be a revolving fund, so the process of receiving and evaluating projects will be an ongoing one.

124

Criteria

The Coast to Capital Board has considered the Government's requirements and has developed a process and criteria that will allow for transparent and objective decision making.

Firstly, all potential investments in sites and infrastructure must meet essential criteria.

The project must be:

 Able to contribute to Coast to Capital's strategic goals for employment growth in the Coast to Capital area and move particularly in the creation of jobs  Unable to go ahead without the investment from other funding sources.  Ready to commence quickly  Able to repay with a clear mechanism  In need of £250,000 or more (special consideration may be given to smaller broadband projects)  Covers multi industry sectors

Other sources of funding Transport There are currently five roundabouts and one traffic controlled junction along the A27 near Chichester. Congestion regularly occurs at these locations and will worsen unless traffic is managed more effectively. On this part of the A27 local commuter traffic competes with the through traffic and because of these conflicts, congestion occurs regularly. The congestion is particularly disruptive as it affects the flow of public transport into the city.

In July 1998, the Transport White Paper 'A New Deal for Trunk Roads in England' initiated several comprehensive studies to improve transportation in various regions of England. The study carried out for the South East region of England was called the South Coast Multi Modal Study (SoCoMMS). In September 2002, the Study recommended a range of transport improvements. For the Chichester Bypass section, the Study recommended the provision of two - level junctions and/or junction closures, in association with a range of complementary measures including improvements to public transport. In 2003, the Secretary of State for Transport rejected all the proposed improvements identified for the bypass at that time by the study. As a result, he asked Highways England to work with the Local Authorities and Statutory Environmental Bodies to develop less environmentally damaging options that addressed local issues and included public transport solutions where considered appropriate.

The Government Spending Review announcement in October 2013 listed the A27 Chichester Improvement Scheme for potential construction. In 2015 a scheme to upgrade to four junctions on the Chichester bypass was included in the Road Investment Strategy for

125 the 2015/16 – 2019/20 Road Period but in 2017 the scheme was cancelled due to there being no clear consensus on a preferred option solution.

Government is currently in the research phase for the Road Investment Strategy for the 2020/21 – 2024/25 Road Period (RIS2). It is not known whether a scheme to improve the Chichester Bypass will be included in RIS2.

Highways England also has plans to make the section of the A27 through Chichester into an Expressway by 2040. Expressways are A- roads that can be relied upon to be as well-designed as motorways and which are able to offer the same standard of journey to users. At a minimum, this means:  Largely or entirely dual carriageway roads that are safe, well-built and resilient to delay;  Junctions which are largely or entirely grade separated, so traffic on the main road can pass over or under roundabouts without stopping;  Modern safety measures and construction standards;  Technology to manage traffic and provide better information to drivers.

This means an Expressway will be able to provide a high-quality journey to its users. Most Expressways should be able to offer a mile a minute journeys throughout the day, particularly outside of urban areas. Safety levels should match the highest standards of the network and, for many parts of the country, an Expressway will be able to provide a motorway-quality journey for drivers.

While this standard is already met at many points on the network, certain routes that may justify Expressway status are inconsistent, repeatedly switching from dual to single carriageway and back again, or suffering serious congestion at a particular roundabout. Highways England will prioritise fixing these problems to provide better journeys.

Highways England recognises that serving the needs of the motorist does not come at the expense of others. Instead, the network should account for the needs of walkers and cyclists, and not act as a deterrent to active travel options. The network must be easier to get over, under or around to ensure that roads do not divide communities, and that the associated health and wellbeing benefits of walking and cycling are felt as widely as possible.

Highways England will also embrace new technology and aim to communicate through smart phones and in-car technology. This will increase the quality, and speed up the flow of information. Control will be returned to drivers, with personalised, predictive travel information helping plan alternative routes to avoid roadworks or unexpected disruption, leading to improved journeys at a more reliable speed.

Highways England has created a series of ring-fenced funds, worth £900 m up to 2020/21 to address a range of specific issues over and above the traditional focus of road investment. These five funds allow for actions beyond business as usual and will help the

126

Company invest in retrofitting measures to improve the existing road network as well as maximising the opportunities offered by new road schemes to deliver additional improvements at the same time. The funds are:  Environment (£300m to mitigate noise, low carbon road transport, improve water quality &resilience to flooding, landscaping & work to halt the loss of biodiversity)  Cycling, safety and Integration (£250m segregated cycleways alongside trunk roads & safer junctions & crossings).  Innovation (£150m for the development of new technologies)  Air Quality (£100m to target improvements in air quality)  Growth and Housing (£100m to provide leverage and flexibility for the Company to engage in progressing schemes on the SRN required to unlock strategic growth. It is a supplement – not substitute for developer contributions and other existing sources of funding. The fund will normally only be applicable to investment on the SRN that: Unlocks major housing development (for example, in the order of 5,000 new homes or more); or key economic growth; and Involves multiple developers; and is funded – at least in part by developer contributions.

Utilities The funding for utilities at a strategic level is usually paid for by the respective utilities company through their asset management plans (AMPs). All incumbent utility undertakers are obliged to submit draft AMPs to their Regulator, identifying the capital investment that the undertaker wants to commit to over the next 5 or 10 years. The investment for these works is sourced from the company’s revenue (customer charges) and covers expansion or enhancement of the strategic utility network against projected growth in demand. The draft AMPs are reviewed and approved by the regulating authorities that protect the interests of the customers. The review of these business plans is called the Periodic Review.

The growth projections used and demand for the utility service must be ‘non-speculative’, so the companies make their own assessments for justification of proposal purposes. Essential works have priority over works that it is possible to defer and frequently not all proposed works are agreed by the respective regulator. Upon agreement with the respective regulator the utility companies produce final AMPs, which typically include the following strategic elements:  Electricity: Grid sub-stations  Gas: Reinforcement to the high/intermediate mains  Water Resource: New abstraction points and water treatment works  Waste Water: New or upgrade works to waste water treatment works

Connection of developments to the non-strategic mains is not included in AMP’s and these are funded in full or in part by the Developer, depending upon the business case of the utility provider. In some cases utilities may also refuse to cover all the costs associated with some strategic infrastructure if they are deemed to be excessive. Strategic utility upgrade projects can take several years, or even more than a decade, to plan, design and implement, whereas the planning process for development can be much quicker. 127

In planning their AMPs the utility companies will want assurance that the predicted additional demand will become a reality. Otherwise, they may find they are committed to infrastructure costs for potential demand that may not materialise, or alternatively situations where they provide significant up-front infrastructure that could then be used by another supplier. Companies are also not able to provide significant infrastructure in advance of any development, as they have a duty to maintain and improve services for their existing customers.

Reinforcement works associated with standard, developer-led developments would be programmed in following receipt of planning permission. However, for larger scale developments this programme may not be not possible. For example, a new grid connection could take 5-10 years to implement, while a new primary sub-station could take 3-5 years. As planning permission is only valid for a period of 3 years, it would not be possible to carry out these significant infrastructure improvements within the timescales provided. Additionally, as the onus would be on the developer to fund the necessary infrastructure, many developers may not be willing to be the first to apply for planning permission.

There are mechanisms that can be used to fund new infrastructure in the absence of a lead developer willing to make the first planning application. One option is through a site-specific infrastructure capacity charge. In this case a utility provider would fund the upfront infrastructure and each subsequent planning application in the area would be subject to a capacity charge, allowing the provider to claw back some of the initial outlay.

Where there is a capacity constraint and no improvements are programmed by the utility company, the Local Planning Authority should require the developer to provide for appropriate improvements which must be completed prior to occupation of the development. Such improvements should be secured through phasing or by the use of Grampian style conditions attached to planning permission.

Education Local Authorities are under a statutory duty to secure sufficient education provision within their areas and to promote higher standards of attainment. In its strategic role as commissioner of school places, the County Council must respond to changes in demand over time by increasing or removing capacity.

Funding for new school places comes through Basic Need grant to LAs to use at any maintained school, including academies and free schools. There is a separate funding stream from EFA for newly approved free schools.

Bids for new DfE funded free schools, where a basic need is identified, can be made via the new schools network. Ideally, LAs should secure both land and a sponsor first.

In 2011, the DfE introduced legislation, where a LA thinks there is a need for a new school in its area it must seek proposals to establish an academy/free school. 128

This section focuses on the Academy and Free school routes to capital finance to support expansion of facilities or new build facilities to support the population growth implications of the Local Plan.

Academies are publicly-funded independent schools. Academies benefit from greater freedoms to innovate and raise standards. These include:  Freedom from local authority control;  The ability to set their own pay and conditions for staff;  Freedoms around the delivery of the curriculum; and  The ability to change the lengths of terms and school days.

Academies are funded by the Education Funding Agency (EFA) on an academic year basis. The EFA is the funding body for capital as well as revenue funding for Academies. Academies receive the same level of per-pupil funding as they would receive from the local authority as a maintained school, plus additions to cover the services that are no longer provided for them by the local authority.

In December 2011 the Secretary of State announced four capital funds for which academies will be eligible: devolved formula capital, the academies Capital Maintenance Fund, the 16-19 Demographic Growth Capital Fund and basic need funding. Two of these are highlighted below.

The Academies Capital Maintenance Fund (ACMF) is currently being used to cover two types of projects – either tackling building condition issues or expanding provision. As well as having a case for expansion, academies applying to the ACMF need to have up to two appropriate, cost effective and deliverable capital projects scoped to address the identified issues. Evidence submitted should be proportionate to the scale of the project. Given the likely demand for such funds, academies will need to demonstrate that not only do they have robust forecasts for demand for places, but that the proposed project provides additional facilities in a cost effective manner. Typically funds are available for two years reflecting building projects which can be delivered for an increased intake in these years. Given the tight timescales for spending the available funding, the EFA will prioritise projects that are ready to proceed immediately i.e. projects which have designs complete, ready to submit planning application or planning approved.

Key data required in an ACMF submission includes:  A track record of success  Historical demand for places at the academy (or its predecessor school pre-conversion) – judged by the number of first and second preference applications and/or staying on rates post-16  Local demographic data to indicate how recent population shifts / growth have influenced demand for places at the academy  Evidence of the current capacity of the academy (net capacity or current capacity based on planned admission number). 129

 Utilisation rates and relevant details of adjustments made to the curriculum and innovative timetabling approaches to maximise the usage of the current accommodation  An options appraisal to justify the case for the scale and the type of additional facilities required at the academy as it grows to demonstrate the project proposed delivers the most cost effective approach to the expansion required.

There will be a need to make the case for expansion for both meeting current demand for places and demographic growth in pupil numbers from planned housing developments in coming years and levering in other sources of funding. For example, ACMF can be used to “top up” Basic Need funding provided by local authorities to ensure the prompt provision of places at popular and successful academies. Projects addressing demographic growth that are unable to lever in other sources of funding will not score as well as those that do.

The 16-19 Demographic Growth Capital Fund addresses the need for new learner places arising from increases in the local population of young people aged 16 to 19, including new places needed for local provision for learners with learning disabilities and/or difficulties. Academies, sixth-form colleges and local authority maintained schools are eligible to benefit from the funding.

Free Schools are all-ability state-funded schools set up in response to what local people say they want and need in order to improve education for children in their community. Funding agreements will be set up directly with the Secretary of State. Free school proposals will have to go through stages to ensure suitability, including a full business plan with the setting out of the school’s financial viability. Organisations seeking to set up a free school are required to submit business plans to the ‘New Schools Network’ who work with the DfE to screen new proposals. There is a current lack of information on the process for capital funding to support the expansion of Free School premises as a result of increased popularity or demographic requirements. FAQs published on the ACMF indicate that Free Schools, Studio Schools and UTCs have received capital allocations from DfE/EFA based on an understanding of their building requirements and are therefore unlikely to be awarded additional funds through the ACMF. A review of Free School model funding agreements seems to suggest that Earmarked Annual Grant (“EAG”) could be paid by the Secretary of State to the Academy Trust in respect of either Recurrent or Capital Expenditure for such specific purposes as may from time to time be agreed with the Secretary of State.

Targeted Basic Need Programme On 18 July 2013, the Minister of State for Schools announced details of capital funding of around £820m that will provided new, high quality school places in locations that need more school places. The programme will offer additional support to those local authorities experiencing the greatest pressure on places and will help them to prepare for further rises in pupil numbers. The programme will deliver new academies and Free Schools, as well as enabling investment to expand existing good and outstanding schools to fund the provision of new, high quality school places in the areas that need it most.

As part of this programme, LAs in England can bid for funding to:

130

1. Build high quality new schools on their own sites. These must be established as an Academy or Free School via the Academy Presumption arrangements; and 2. Permanently expand existing good and outstanding Academies and maintained schools.

The local authority needs to ensure that it can deliver the additional pupil places within the timescale and budget available. To support this, the Department of Education will be seeking information that the proposed land/site is suitable. This will include information regarding the land/site condition, size, ownership and planning considerations which will help establish its suitability. As the funding is fixed, the site would also ideally be cleared of any existing structures that are not needed as part of the new build school.

Local authorities have to demonstrate evidence of basic need and set out the wider strategic context in terms of why the proposed provision cannot be funded from within existing allocations. Local authorities also have to demonstrate that they can deliver the new schools and classrooms to time. As such, the land or site should already be in Local authority ownership (or that of a close partner organisation). If the Local authority has to go through a process to identify and purchase/lease a suitable site then this makes the delivery of additional school places unlikely within the available timetable. If a site is identified and purchase can be achieved quickly, then this will be considered. The provision of a suitable site or land will be a contribution to the project by the Local authority and DfE will not provide funding for this.

The funding will cover building and site costs. The funding will also cover abnormals, professional fees, fixtures, fittings and equipment (FF&E), ICT infrastructure, ICT hardware and technical adviser fees (including project management costs). Further funding will not be provided to cover additional S106 or S278 requirements.

The new programme involves two separate stages of competition. In the first, councils will compete to win funding, by demonstrating the scale of their places crisis. They will then be required to run a competitive process to choose the provider of the new schools.

As at July 2015, WSCC has allocated its current 16-19 Demographic Growth Fund and Targeted Basic Need allocations. Unless the DfE allocates further funds under these headings it will not be possible to link them to Chichester. There are no other sources of funding available.

Potential future funding sources The development of off-site infrastructure, which was always the most challenging to argue an economic case for even in a strong property market, needs to be positioned in terms of wider (and more innovative) funding mechanisms that are being developed by the public and private sectors. The market is in an economy where development investment finance is less freely available and risk is under greater scrutiny. This is coupled with an austerity budget position in the public sector resulting in lower availability of funding to support similar projects.

131

Local authorities need to look across their full range of funding streams when considering delivery and prioritisation of infrastructure requirements. The flexibility to mix funding sources at a local level enables local authorities to be more efficient in delivering outcomes. Funding sources change over time with emerging priorities and changes in regime either at local, regional or national level. In addition, other partners and stakeholders may be able to play a part.

The following options reflect current possibilities for funding. They reflect a wide range of options based on the proposed uses coming forward through the Local Plan, intelligence and experience of the developer/ financier community and existing and emerging sources of public sector funding.

Our analysis has focused on three categories:  Cash and Funds – funding from sources of ‘investment capital’, including grant funding and commercial finance, potentially delivered through a joint venture mechanism;  Assets – funding sources that arise from capturing an increase in land value; and  Fiscal – funding that comes from the application of main stream fiscal tools (e.g. business rates).

Cash and Funds Prudential Borrowing (Public Works Loan Board or ‘PWLB’) This is the main direct funding source for local authorities and is still perceived as a cheap form of financing. It is also arguably an efficient option to implement as the obligations fall predominantly on the local authority to ensure it has properly assessed affordability. Under the PWLB option, CDC or WSCC would have to assess its own level of borrowing commitment at the time the capital is needed.

Effectively, the District/County would have to assess the level of income it would generate against repayments it has to make, or whether wider County resources will be required. It has the benefit of being a relatively reliable source of finance, not being subject to commercial market appraisals in the way that a bank financed project would be. However, it does place CDC or WSCC in a position of risk in terms of repaying the whole value of infrastructure from resources, if revenue or value through the schemes to come forward cannot be captured. CDC or WSCC would need to determine whether PWLB is appropriate in terms of any existing or intended facilities if this was to be used for infrastructure.

Regional Growth Fund (RGF) This is a £1.4bn discretionary fund set up by the Government to stimulate projects that create long term employment opportunities and growth in the economy. To secure monies from the RGF there has to be evidence of a strong link to job creation and inward investment, on the basis it is the catalytic investment that allows new businesses to develop or existing businesses to expand. In any event RGF is not expected to extend beyond 2014 and is likely to be replaced by the LEP single pot funding announced in the Autumn statement.

132

Get Britain Building (GBB) The £570m Get Britain Building programme was announced as part of the Government’s Housing Strategy for England in November 2011, and aims to unlock locally-backed stalled sites with planning permission and deliver up to 16,000 new homes. A recoverable investment, the programme is intended to address difficulties in accessing development finance faced by some housebuilders, and to help bring forward marginal sites by sharing risk. The intention is that the Government will ultimately recover its funding - this is not a grant scheme. The programme was open to private sector organisations that control land and can develop at least 25 homes on the stalled site by December 2014.

Assets The increase in land value has been a mainstay of economic development financing over the last ten years. Utilising a range of tools, such as development agreements, local asset backed vehicles or other joint ventures, local authorities have been able to secure large amounts of infrastructure from improvements to land values. This has needed to be combined with careful use of planning consents and S106 agreements, but with the restrictions on pooling of S106 contributions moving forward then the ability to use this option may narrow.

The rewards or benefits of a Local Asset Backed Vehicle in certain circumstances outweigh the costs. It should not be forgotten that the financial implications of setting up a Local Asset Backed Vehicle (LABV) are significant. Procurement, preparing and agreeing legal documentation, to include specialist property and financial advice require significant Officer and external advisor time. Experiences elsewhere show these costs could easily be around £250,000-£300,000, possibly more. Once in place, on-going management and due diligence needs to be considered, along with post procurement advice and support to the authority. If such costs were sought to be recovered through the vehicle it would in effect become a reduction of the land costs. Benefits are based very much on the attractiveness of the portfolio, end value or lot size and ability and quantum of total profit likely to be generated.

Fiscal Business rate retention and Tax Increment Financing The Local Government Finance Bill Business rate retention and Tax Increment Financing represent a real opportunity to bridge the infrastructure funding gap. It requires the enactment of legislation currently before parliament, but which should be on the statute books before March 2013. The Local Government Finance Bill was introduced on 19 December 2011. The Bill would introduce local retention of business rates, as well as powers for the Secretary of State to introduce Tax Increment Financing to allow councils to borrow against future increases in income. The Bill proposes that local authorities will be able to retain a proportion of future nondomestic rates (business rates) growth, subject to various checks and balances. This is called the Business Rates Retention Scheme (BRRS). A proportion of the business rates collected by billing authorities will be paid into a central pool (the central share) with the remaining proportion retained by the authority (the local share). Proportions dictating the local and national share will be set by the Secretary of State. The BRRS will be funded from the local share.

133

A baseline level with top ups and tariffs to create a fair starting point for all Government will establish a baseline, which could be based on next year's Formula Grant allocations, for each council in the first year of the scheme (2013-14) so no council is worse off at the outset. Councils that collect more than that baseline would pay an individually set tariff to Government, while those below it would get an individually set top up grant from Government.

An authority whose local business rates baseline exceeds its baseline funding level will pay a tariff to government. An authority whose local business rates baseline is smaller than their local funding baseline will receive a top-up from government.

Key elements of the scheme include:

 An incentive so all councils can grow: Tariffs and top up grants would remain fixed during future years meaning councils would retain any business rate growth it generates.  The levy to recoup disproportionate gain: Government will create a levy to recoup a share of any disproportionate financial gain. This will vary according to each individual council's own circumstances and would be used to manage significant unforeseen falls in a council's business rates income.  The reset button to ensure stability: This will allow the Government to adjust top ups and tariffs to balance out changes in local circumstance. For there to be a genuine incentive effect, the reset period has to be long one. As the levels of baseline, tariff and top-ups are not yet known it cannot be established whether this will produce significant funding for the infrastructure required, but HDC should monitor the proposals in readiness for implementation.

Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Tax Increment Financing allows local authorities to capture the value of uplifts in local taxes (business rates) that occur as a result of infrastructure investment. Tax Increment Financing allows that uplift to take place by borrowing against the value of the future uplift to deliver the necessary infrastructure.

Local retention of business rates will remove the most important barrier to Tax Increment Financing schemes, namely that local authorities are currently not permitted to retain any of their business rates and therefore could not borrow against any predicted increase in their business rates. Borrowing for Tax Increment Financing schemes would therefore fall under the prudential system, allowing local authorities to borrow for capital projects against future predicted increases in business rates growth, provided that they can afford to service the borrowing costs out of revenue resources. However, such borrowing can only take place if local authorities and developers have a degree of certainty about the future tax revenue streams and whether there are sufficient guarantees that they will be retained within the authority.

The Local Government Finance Bill includes two options for TIF. Option one would see local authorities within the existing prudential borrowing rules, able to borrow against their income within the business rate retention scheme. Option two would allow a limited

134 number of Tax Increment Financing schemes to be permitted in which the business rates growth would not be subject to the levy or reset for a defined period of time.

Option 1 In the rates retention system as described above, after the setting of either the tariffs and top up in year one, any additional business rates growth would sit in the defined area in which it is generated, but be subject to a levy to recoup a share of disproportionate benefit. Under this option, Government would not design in any special treatment of the revenues in the Tax Increment Financing area. This would mean that any growth in business rates within the area would be subject to the levy and would be taken into account in any reset of top ups and tariffs. Local authorities would be free to borrow against all their retained business rate revenues including anticipated growth, subject to the normal operation of the prudential borrowing system. Local authorities would have certainty about how the levy is applied to recoup a share of disproportionate benefit and would be able to plan borrowing and Tax Increment Financing projects on this basis.

Option 2 Under this option, which would be implemented in addition to option 1, additional business rates growth (resulting from the Tax Increment Financing project) within a defined area would be retained for a defined period of time. During this period, it would not be subject to the levy and would be disregarded in any reassessment of top ups and tariffs. This approach offers the benefit of a guarantee that business rates growth in a defined area could be used to service debt and would not be at risk of reduction from the levy and resets. However, since the business rate growth in the area would be protected from the levy and from resets, there would be less money in the levy pot to manage significant volatilities and potentially a smaller proportion of resources would be available for re- balancing at any reset. With no controls over numbers of Tax Increment Financing schemes, this effect could be substantial. As a result, this approach would require government control or approval in order to limit the number of schemes coming forward and maintain resources available for re-balancing at any reset. This could be done through a central government competition or bidding process.

PF2 On the 5th December 2013, the Government concluded its review of PFI and published full details of a new approach to public private partnerships, PF2. They key reforms are as follows:  Public sector equity - The public sector will take an equity stake in projects and have a seat on the boards of project companies, ensuring taxpayers receive a share of the profits generated by the deal.  Encouraging more investors with long-term investment horizons - The use of funding competitions will be introduced to encourage institutional investors such as, Pension Funds to compete to take equity in a PF2 project after the design stage. This is significant in terms of risk as Pension Funds are unlikely to invest in projects that are insufficiently developed.  Greater transparency - Companies will have to disclose actual and forecast annual profits from deals. The new PF2 structure will curb gains to be made from refinancing and unutilised funds in lifecycle reserves.

135

 More efficient delivery - An 18-month limit on procurement will be introduced. Failure to meet this limit will see the respective public sector body lose funding.  Future debt finance - the tender process will require bidders to develop a long-term financing solution where bank debt does not provide the majority of the financing requirement. Institutional investment will, therefore, become an important source of finance for PF2.

Summary The results of this analysis have highlighted three types of additional funding source:  Existing funding sources which are currently open for bidding or could be influenced through actions of the joint IBP liaison group;  Identified future funding sources which have a clear timeframe within which bidding rounds will be open or a clear timeframe to deliver finances which could be used to support infrastructure provision; and  Potential future funding sources which do not have a clear timeframe within which bidding rounds will operate, are subject to broader considerations (e.g. Government decisions), or require further investigation.

Future reviews of the IBP will need to update this analysis and the members of the joint IBP liaison group could identify and bid into other funding streams (as appropriate).

Potential funding sources along with potential sources of revenue for the repayment of capital loans

Potential sources of capital funds for infrastructure to deliver the Chichester Local Plan : Key Policies Type Source Comments Repayment Required Local Authority Grant WSCC Annual Government Capital Yes, although local government Chichester DC Allocations to Local Authorities, financial settlement makes not usually repaid e.g. LTP provision for this debt Integrated block. repayment Council’s Capital WSCC Own capital on account or from Council’s decision Chichester DC future asset sales Prudential borrowing Public Works Loan Board Yes Private Capital Banks Indirect lending (Debt finance) Yes Private Capital Private Capital Funds Channelled through a third party Yes Private Capital Institutional Investors Pension Funds Yes Private Capital Developer Capital receipts to the Council No, unless required by Council from the sale of Council owned Policy development land Dft Grant Funding Central Government Yes, as for Local Authority 136

Grant above. LEP Coast to Capital LEP Capital funding to be repaid in Yes future Other competitive central Central Government Generally there is a new Possibly (depends on the government funding pots such targeted fund specific terms & conditions) as the Local Investment Fund

Potential Sources of revenue for repayment of capital Type Mechanism Debtor Planning Obligations S106 Private Sector Developers Tax Incremental % of Future Business Rates in Private Sector Businesses Funding (TIF) designated areas Enterprise Zones retained business rates to Private Sector Businesses encourage more business to locate/relocate New Homes Bonus Direct grant paid to Local Central Government (CLG) Authorities for delivery of new homes Council Tax Agreed additional annual charge Council tax payers added to Council Tax LTP Capital Funding Annual proportion set aside to WSCC fund capital repayment Local Business Rates Increase in tax base stimulated by Private Sector Businesses Retained (LBRR) new infrastructure

137

Appendix E Project Pro-forma

Infrastructure categories Below are the categories to be used in the IDP:

 Transport  Education  Health  Social infrastructure (e.g. community facilities, sports & leisure)  Green infrastructure  Public and community services  Utility services

Table to be produced for each infrastructure delivery commissioner: The information provided will inform future versions of the IDP, and will feed into the production of a five year rolling Infrastructure Business Plan.

Infrastructure Scheme Justification/ Phasing Total estimated Sources of Delivery lead Category (from above (description) rationale (when) infrastructure cost funding, showing (who/how) list) amounts from each source & any shortfalls

138

Appendix F Regulation 123 list Infrastructure Projects to be funded at least in Exclusions part by the CIL (to be secured through planning obligations (provision, improvement, replacement, operation or maintenance) S106/S278)

Transport Transport 1. Improvements to the local road network other than site-specific 1. Strategic Road Network improvements to the A27 Chichester mitigation requirements Bypass junctions in order to relieve congestion. 2. Measures in connection with ‘smarter choices’ to secure changed travel behaviours and promote the use of more sustainable Provision of the following cycle routes: modes of transport other than site-specific requirements 2. St Paul's cycle route, and Parklands cycle route in conjunction 3. Provision of public transport infrastructure other with the West of Chichester Strategic Development Location; than site-specific requirements 3. Oving cycle route in conjunction with the Shopwyke Strategic 4. Provision of pedestrian infrastructure other than site-specific Development Location; requirements 4. Chichester - Tangmere cycle route in conjunction with the 5. Provision of cycle infrastructure other than site-specific Tangmere Strategic Development Location; requirements 5. Improvements to Sherborne Road and St. Paul's Road and junction in conjunction with the West of Chichester Strategic Development Location.

6. Provision of new road access and improvements to nearby roads connecting with southern access in conjunction with the West of Chichester Strategic Development Location.

7. Junction improvements to Cathedral Way/Via Ravenna in conjunction with the West of Chichester Strategic Development Location.

8. Provision of 2 new foot/cycle bridges across the A27 in conjunction with Shopwyke Lakes SDL.

9. Changes to Oving crossroad in conjunction with the Shopwyke Lakes SDL.

10. Provision of bus routes through the SDL's. Education Education 139

1. Provision for which the local education authority has a statutory Provision of new primary schools to be provided in conjunction with the responsibility (primary schools, secondary schools, and sixth development of the Strategic Development Locations at: form and special educational needs) with the exception of 1. West of Chichester, and primary school provision on the Strategic development Locations 2. Tangmere. at West of Chichester and Tangmere. 2. Early Years and Childcare provision 3. Youth provision Health 1. Community Healthcare/Primary Care facilities/improvements Social Infrastructure Social Infrastructure 1. Community facilities other than site-specific requirements. 1. Provision necessary to make the development acceptable in 2. Built Sport and Leisure Facilities other than site-specific planning terms. requirements. 3. General improvements to streetscene and built Environment 4. Libraries Green Infrastructure Green Infrastructure 1. Green Infrastructure (including landscaping, planting and 1. Provision necessary to make the development acceptable in woodland creation and improvements and upgrades and planning terms. additions to the Public Rights of Way Network) other than site- specific requirements 2. Public Open Space other than site-specific requirements 3. Playing Fields, Sports Pitches and related built facilities, and children's play areas other than site-specific requirements 4. Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Infrastructure, other than site-specific requirements 5. Biodiversity measures/initiatives other than site-specific requirements 6. Provision of allotments other than site-specific requirements. Habitat Regulations Assessment Mitigation 1. Provision of infrastructure or other mitigation measures necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms

2. Financial contribution towards management of Natura 2000 sites. Public Services Public Services 1. Police and emergency services (fire and rescue and ambulance) 1. Provision necessary to make the development acceptable in facilities other than site specific measures. planning terms, for example CCTV or fire hydrants, required specifically as a result of a new development Affordable housing provision and contributions 140

Appendix G - IBP Glossary

Basic Needs Grant - This is a Department for Education grant given as a financial contribution to local authorities’ to assist with the costs of delivering school places.

EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment. It is a statutory procedure to be followed for certain types of project to ensure that decisions are made in full knowledge of any likely significant effects on the environment.

FDGiA - Flood Defence Grant in Aid. It is an Environment Agency grant which risk management authorities can apply for in order to carry out flood and coastal erosion risk management. This does not have to be applied for in order to carry out emergency coastal protection works.

LIFT - Local Improvement Finance Trust. A local LIFT company builds and refurbishes primary care premises, which it owns. It rents accommodation to Primary Care Trusts and GPs (as well as other parties such as chemists, optician and dentists) on a lease basis. At local level, a LIFT company is a public private partnership (PPP). It is set up as a limited company with the local NHS (potentially including individual practitioners), Community Health Partnerships (CHP) and the private sector as shareholders. CHP is a limited company wholly owned by the Department of Health. CHP invests money in LIFT and also helps attract additional private funding. As a shareholder, the local NHS is best placed to direct investment to the areas of greatest need.

SEA - Strategic Environmental Assessment. It is a statutory procedure (set out in the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004) which requires the formal environmental assessment of certain plans and programmes which are likely to have significant effects on the environment.

TIA - Traffic Impact Assessments. These are undertaken by transport engineers and planners to assess the possible effects of a project on the traffic system to ensure that congestion would not arise in the immediate area as a result of a given proposal.

141