DOCSLIB.ORG

Pace Through the Race

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pace Through the Race annual REPORT 2018 PACE THROUGH THE RACE RUSAL ANNUAL REPORT 2018 REPORT ANNUAL RUSAL CONTENTS FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS 2 CORPORATE PROFILE 5 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT 11 CEO’S REVIEW 14 BUSINESS OVERVIEW 17 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 41 PROFILES OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT 81 DIRECTORS’ REPORT 99 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT 177 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 197 GLOSSARY 343 APPENDIX A 355 - Principal Terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement with the Company APPENDIX B 359 - Principal Terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement among Major Shareholders only CORPORATE INFORMATION 366 1 Financial and Operational Highlights Annual Report RUSAL 2018 FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS 2 Financial and Operational Highlights Annual Report RUSAL 2018 USD million (unless otherwise specified) 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Revenue 10,280 9,969 7,983 8,680 9,357 Adjusted EBITDA 2,163 2,120 1,489 2,015 1,514 Adjusted EBITDA Margin 21.0% 21.3% 18.7% 23.2% 16.2% EBIT 1,481 1,523 1,068 1,409 942 Share of Profits from Associates and joint ventures 955 620 848 368 536 Pre Tax Profit 1,953 1,288 1,354 763 147 Profit/(Loss) 1,698 1,222 1,179 558 (91) Profit/(Loss) Margin 16.5% 12.3% 14.8% 6.4% (1.0%) Adjusted Net Profit 856 1,077 292 671 17 Adjusted Net Profit Margin 8.3% 10.8% 3.7% 7.7% 0.2% Recurring Net Profit 1,695 1,573 959 1,097 486 Basic Earnings/(Loss) Per Share (in USD) 0.112 0.080 0.078 0.037 (0.006) Total Assets 15,777 15,774 14,452 12,809 14,857 Equity Attributable to Shareholders of the Company 5,209 4,444 3,299 1,391 2,237 Net Debt 7,442 7,648 8,421 8,372 8,837 3 Reduced weight Manoeuvring and speedy CORPORATE 01 PROFILE Corporate Profile Annual Report RUSAL 2018 CORPORATE PROFILE RUSAL is a low-cost, vertically integrated aluminium producer with core smelting operations located in Siberia, Russia. In 2018, RUSAL remained among the largest producers of primary aluminium and alloys globally. million tonnes 8 7.5 7 6.6 6 5 4.0 3.8 4 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.5 3 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 2 1.6 1 0 Hongqiao Chalco RUSAL Xinfa Rio TintoEGA SPICAlcoa Norsk Vedanta Group Hydro 2017 2018 * China producers 2018 output wasn’t published/publicly available at the time of Annual Report preparation, therefore Aladdiny source was used for the volumes estimation. Source: Based on RUSAL’s internal company report, and peer companies’ publicly available results, announcements, reports and other information. RUSAL’s production chain includes bauxite and neph- operations. Our existing bauxite resource base is suffi- eline ore mines, alumina refineries, aluminium smelters cient to supply for over 100 years of operations. and casting houses, foil mills, packaging and wheels pro- duction centers. Efficient midstream, proprietary R&D and internal EPCM expertise Secured access to green, renewable electricity RUSAL aluminum smelting operations go through Electricity is a key component of the aluminum regular upgrades. RUSAL has developed its own production process. RUSAL’s core smelting operations in-house R&D, design and engineering centers and are favorably located close to the Siberian hydro power operates RA-300, RA-400 and Green Soederberg plants sourcing from them approximately 93% of the smelting technologies. A new energy efficient and Group’s total electricity needs. The Company has environmentally friendly RA-500, RA-550 smelting long term agreements with the region’s hydro-power technology has been designed and currently RUSAL is energy suppliers. Using renewable and environmentally testing it, targeting the best energy efficiency yields in friendly hydro generated electricity, RUSAL is targeting the industry. the lowest CO2 footprint in the industry. RUSAL is actively developing a groundbreaking inert an- Captive raw material supplies ode technology. Introducing this state-of-art technology into the production process will lead to complete elimi- RUSAL alumina production capacities are located nation of greenhouse gas and polyaromatic hydrocarbon in Russia and abroad. These operations cover over emissions coupled with 10% cut in operational costs ’ approximately 100% of the Group s total alumina needs. through reducing anode and energy consumption and over a 30% cut in Greenfield projects expenditure costs. Our alumina refineries bauxite needs are covered by up to 75% with supplies from the Group’s bauxite mining 6 Corporate Profile Annual Report RUSAL 2018 Cost efficiency 2017 RUSAL has launched a new low carbon aluminium brand, ALLOW, which features a significantly lower carbon The efficient smelting technologies together with footprint – specific volume of greenhouse gas emissions low cost input material and utilities mix secures the – as compared to industry average (4t CO2/t Al vs 12.3t Company’s global leadership on the cost curve. CO2/t Al of world average (scope 1 and 2 at the smelter). The Company first verified its ALLOW brand in 2018 with Focus on higher margin downstream business the help of the international auditor KPMG. In 2017, 77% of the Company’s output was attributed to this brand. The RUSAL has a diversified product mix with a strong share computations followed the methodology contained in of VAP in the portfolio (1.66 million tonnes per annum the International Aluminium Institute’s carbon footprint out of 3.67 million tonnes of total sales). reporting guidelines published in February 2018. Diversified sales geography Diversification opportunities through investments RUSAL sales mix is represented by a diversified portfolio of regions. The Company delivers aluminium products — As at the Latest Practicable Date, RUSAL owns an ef- to the domestic market and to all key global consuming fective 27.82% interest in Norilsk Nickel, the world’s regions (Europe, America, South East Asia). largest nickel and palladium producer and one of the leading producers of platinum and copper1. — ’ Growth potential of the RUSAL platform RUSAL s 50/50 LLP Bogatyr Komir coal joint ven- ture in the Ekibastuz coal basin, one of the largest coal basins in the CIS, provides RUSAL with a natu- The BEMO Project (RUSAL and Rushydro JV) includes ral energy hedge. the 3,000 megawatt BEMO HPP (the construction of which was completed in 2014) and Boguchansky aluminium smelter in the Krasnoyarsk region of Russia. Key facts In March 2019, the launch of the second part of the first stage brought the total production capacity to almost In 2018, RUSAL accounted for approximately 5.8% 300 thousand tonnes per annum. of the world’s aluminium output and about 6.2% of the world’s alumina production, generated from the One of RUSAL’s other major projects is the Taishet following facilities located around the world. aluminium smelter in the Irkutsk region. The production capacity of the first line once launched will be — 10 aluminium smelters, of which 9 are in Russia, and 428.5 thousand tonnes. During 2018, the Company 1 in Sweden continued to finance this smelter’s construction using its — 8 alumina refineries, of which 3 are in Russia, 1 in own funds. It is important to note that the launch of these Ireland, 1 in Ukraine, 1 in Jamaica, 1 in Italy and 1 in projects is happening when the market is experiencing a Guinea growing aluminium deficit. — 7 bauxite mines, of which 2 are in Russia, 1 in Ja- maica, 3 in Guinea and 1 in Guyana — Implementing environmental initiatives 1 nepheline mine in Russia — 4 foil mills, of which 3 are in Russia and 1 in Arme- nia RUSAL was one of the first Russian companies that joined — 4 powder plants, all of which are in Russia UN Global Compact. By following its environmental — 2 silicon factories, all of which are in Russia policy and undertaking to regularly review and update — 2 wheels factories situated in Russia its provisions, the Company is constantly developing and improving its environmental management system and implementing its principles at all production facilities. In RUSAL’s ordinary shares are listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and the Moscow Exchange. 1 Source: www.nornickel.ru 7 Map of Operations Annual Report RUSAL 2018 MAP OF OPERATIONS ARMENIA 01 Armenal AUSTRALIA 02 QAL 14 GUINEA 19 21 32 03 Compagnie des bauxites 15 25 23 de Kindia (CBK) 24 12 33 17 40 22 34 26 28 04 Dian Dian Project 18 16 13 37 05 Friguia Bauxite & 35 29 20 31 Alumina Complex 27 30 07 36 RUSSIA 38 GUYANA 12 Achinsk Alumina Refinery 39 10 41 06 Bauxite Company 13 Bogoslovsky Alumina Refinery 41 of Guyana (BCGI) 14 Boguchanskaya HPP 0808 01 (BEMO) IRELAND 15 Boguchansky Aluminium Smelter 07 Aughinish Alumina (BEMO) 16 Boksitogorsk Alumina Refinery ITALY 17 Bratsk Aluminium Smelter 08 Eurallumina 18 Irkutsk Aluminium Smelter 09 19 Kandalaksha Aluminium Smelter 03 05 JAMAICA 20 Khakas Aluminium Smelter 11 04 09 WindalcO 21 Kia-Shaltyr Nepheline Mine 06 22 Krasnoturyinsk Powder Metallurgy KAZAKHSTAN 23 Krasnoyarsk Aluminium Smelter 10 LLP Bogatyr Komir 24 Nadvoitsy Aluminium Smelter 25 North Urals Bauxite Mine NIGERIA 26 Novokuznetsk Aluminium Smelter 11 ALSCON 27 Sayana Foil 28 SAYANAL 29 Sayanogorsk Aluminium Smelter 02 30 Shelekhov Powder Metallurgy 31 Silicon (ZAO Kremniy), Shelekhov 32 SKAD wheels factory 33 Taishet Aluminium Smelter (project) 34 Timan Bauxite 35 Urals Alumina Refinery 36 Urals Foil 37 Urals Silicon 38 Volgograd Aluminium Smelter 39 Volgograd Powder Metallurgy SWEDEN 40 KUBAL UKRAINE 41 Nikolaev Alumina Refinery 8 Map of Operations Annual Report RUSAL 2018 14 19 21 32 15 25 23 24 12 33 17 40 22 34 26 28 18 16 13 37 35 29 20 27 31 36 30 07 38 39 10 4141 0808 01 09 03 05 11 04 06 02 Aluminium Foil Nepheline ore Alumina Powders Other business Bauxite Silicon Wheels 9 Improved swing Vibration absorbing CHAIRMAN’S 02 STATEMENT Chairman’s Statement Annual Report RUSAL 2018 CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT Bernard Zonneveld Chairman of the Board Dear Shareholders, I am delighted to welcome you to RUSAL’s Annual Report for 2018.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mineral Indutry of Russia in 1998
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF RUSSIA By Richard M. Levine Russia extends over more than 75% of the territory of the According to the Minister of Natural Resources, Russia will former Soviet Union (FSU) and accordingly possesses a large not begin to replenish diminishing reserves until the period from percentage of the FSU’s mineral resources. Russia was a major 2003 to 2005, at the earliest. Although some positive trends mineral producer, accounting for a large percentage of the were appearing during the 1996-97 period, the financial crisis in FSU’s production of a range of mineral products, including 1998 set the geological sector back several years as the minimal aluminum, bauxite, cobalt, coal, diamonds, mica, natural gas, funding that had been available for exploration decreased nickel, oil, platinum-group metals, tin, and a host of other further. In 1998, 74% of all geologic prospecting was for oil metals, industrial minerals, and mineral fuels. Still, Russia was and gas (Interfax Mining and Metals Report, 1999n; Novikov significantly import-dependent on a number of mineral products, and Yastrzhembskiy, 1999). including alumina, bauxite, chromite, manganese, and titanium Lack of funding caused a deterioration of capital stock at and zirconium ores. The most significant regions of the country mining enterprises. At the majority of mining enterprises, there for metal mining were East Siberia (cobalt, copper, lead, nickel, was a sharp decrease in production indicators. As a result, in the columbium, platinum-group metals, tungsten, and zinc), the last 7 years more than 20 million metric tons (Mt) of capacity Kola Peninsula (cobalt, copper, nickel, columbium, rare-earth has been decommissioned at iron ore mining enterprises.
    [Show full text]
  • Oleg Deripaska Has Struggled for Legitimacy in the United States, Where He Has Been Dogged by Civil Lawsuits Questioning the Methods He Used to Build That Empire
    The Globe and Mail (Canada) May 11, 2007 Friday Preferred by the Kremlin, shunned by the States BYLINE: SINCLAIR STEWART, With a report from Greg Keenan in Toronto SECTION: NEWS BUSINESS; STRONACH'S NEW PARTNER: 'ONE OF PUTIN'S FAVOURITE OLIGARCHS'; Pg. A1 LENGTH: 957 words DATELINE: NEW YORK He is perhaps the most powerful of Russia's oligarchs, a precocious - some would say ruthless - billionaire, who built his fortune against the bloody backdrop of that country's "aluminum wars" in the 1990s. He has nurtured close ties to the Kremlin, married the daughter of former president Boris Yeltsin's son-in-law, amassed an estimated $8-billion in personal wealth and built a corporate empire that stretches from metals and automobiles to aircraft and construction. Yet for all his success at home, 39-year-old Oleg Deripaska has struggled for legitimacy in the United States, where he has been dogged by civil lawsuits questioning the methods he used to build that empire. Mr. Deripaska has repeatedly denied allegations levelled against him, and he has not been specifically accused by American authorities of any crime. However, these whispers about shady business dealings may raise concerns about his $1.5-billion investment in Canada's Magna International, not to mention Magna's attempts to win control of DaimlerChrysler, an iconic American company. The United States has recently shown protectionist proclivities, citing national security concerns to quash both a Chinese state-owned oil company's bid for Unocal Ltd. and a planned acquisition of U.S. port service contracts by Dubai Ports World.
    [Show full text]
  • Pace Through the Race
    annual REPORT 2018 PACE THROUGH THE RACE RUSAL ANNUAL REPORT 2018 REPORT ANNUAL RUSAL CONTENTS FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS 2 CORPORATE PROFILE 5 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT 11 CEO’S REVIEW 14 BUSINESS OVERVIEW 17 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 41 PROFILES OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT 81 DIRECTORS’ REPORT 99 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT 177 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 197 GLOSSARY 343 APPENDIX A 355 - Principal Terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement with the Company APPENDIX B 359 - Principal Terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement among Major Shareholders only CORPORATE INFORMATION 366 1 Financial and Operational Highlights Annual Report RUSAL 2018 FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS 2 Financial and Operational Highlights Annual Report RUSAL 2018 USD million (unless otherwise specified) 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Revenue 10,280 9,969 7,983 8,680 9,357 Adjusted EBITDA 2,163 2,120 1,489 2,015 1,514 Adjusted EBITDA Margin 21.0% 21.3% 18.7% 23.2% 16.2% EBIT 1,481 1,523 1,068 1,409 942 Share of Profits from Associates and joint ventures 955 620 848 368 536 Pre Tax Profit 1,953 1,288 1,354 763 147 Profit/(Loss) 1,698 1,222 1,179 558 (91) Profit/(Loss) Margin 16.5% 12.3% 14.8% 6.4% (1.0%) Adjusted Net Profit 856 1,077 292 671 17 Adjusted Net Profit Margin 8.3% 10.8% 3.7% 7.7% 0.2% Recurring Net Profit 1,695 1,573 959 1,097 486 Basic Earnings/(Loss) Per Share (in USD) 0.112 0.080 0.078 0.037 (0.006) Total Assets 15,777 15,774 14,452 12,809 14,857 Equity Attributable to Shareholders of the Company 5,209 4,444 3,299 1,391 2,237 Net Debt 7,442 7,648 8,421 8,372 8,837 3 Reduced weight Manoeuvring and speedy CORPORATE 01 PROFILE Corporate Profile Annual Report RUSAL 2018 CORPORATE PROFILE RUSAL is a low-cost, vertically integrated aluminium producer with core smelting operations located in Siberia, Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Veps Language Heritage in Karelia1
    NINA ZAICEVA Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences Veps language heritage in Karelia1 1. Introduction Veps people live in Russia on the border of the Republic of Karelia, in Leningrad region and Vologda region. Based on the most recent Russian population census in 2010 (Vserossijskaja perepis nasele­ nija 2010), 5 936 people consider themselves Veps, of which 3 423 live in Karelia, 1 380 live in Leningrad region, and 412 live in Vo­ logda region. The decline in the Veps population and Veps language skills has been an urgent matter for researchers, society, and state authorities. In 2000, a Russian Federation government decree listed the Veps people in the Russian Federation Joint List of Indigenous Minorities as a community under special state protection (see Stro­ galschikova 2014: 237, 245). The Veps language also was included in the Russian Federation Red List of Languages (Krasnaja kniga 1994: 21–22). These efforts were intended to stimulate Veps lan­ guage revitalization and cultural preservation as well as restoring active bilingualism in areas where Veps language teaching in schools would be helpful. In the Republic of Karelia, several books in Veps have been published: textbooks for schools and universities, phrase books, bilingual dictionaries, and spelling dictionaries (see Zaiceva 2006: 119–135). The Veps media consist of the newspaper Kodima, the magazine Kipinä for children (in Veps, Kibin), and weekly TV and radio programs. 1. The study was carried out under state order (Project No. АААА­А18­ 118012490344­5). Multi lingual Finnic. Language contact and change. 379–400. Uralica Helsingiensia 14. Helsinki 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for St
    List of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region № Units Addresses п\п 1 Admiralteysky District of Saint 190013, Saint Petersburg Vereyskaya Street, 39 Petersburg 2 Vasileostrovsky District of Saint 199106, Saint Petersburg, Vasilyevsky Island, 19th Line, 12a Petersburg 3 Vyborgsky District of Saint 194156, Saint Petersburg, Prospekt Parkhomenko, 18 Petersburg 4 Kalininsky District of Saint 195297, Saint Petersburg, Bryantseva Street, 15 Petersburg 5 Kirovsky District of Saint 198152, Saint Petersburg, Avtovskaya Street, 22 Petersburg 6 Kolpinsky District of Saint 198152, Saint Petersburg, Kolpino, Pavlovskaya Street, 1 Petersburg 7 Krasnogvardeisky District of 195027, Saint Petersburg, Bolsheokhtinsky Prospekt, 11/1 Saint Petersburg 8 Krasnoselsky District of Saint 198329, Saint Petersburg, Tambasova Street, 4 Petersburg 9 Kurortny District of Saint 197706, Saint Petersburg, Sestroretsk, Primorskoe Highway, Petersburg 280 10 Kronshtadtsky District of Saint 197760, Saint Petersburg, Kronstadt, Lenina Prospekt, 20 Petersburg 11 Moskovsky District of Saint 196135, Saint Petersburg, Tipanova Street, 3 Petersburg 12 Nevsky District of Saint 192171, Saint Petersburg, Sedova Street, 86 Petersburg 13 Petrogradsky District of Saint 197022, Saint Petersburg, Grota Street, 1/3 Petersburg 14 Petrodvortsovy District of Saint 198516, Saint Petersburg, Peterhof, Petersburg Konnogrenaderskaya Street., 1 15 Primorsky District of Saint 197374 Saint Petersburg, Yakhtennaya Street, 7/2
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Advocacy Coalitions
    Russian Advocacy Coalitions A study in Power Resources This study examines the advocacy coalitions in Russia. Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework, it looks at the power resource distribution amongst the coalitions, and how this distribution affects Russian foreign policy. The power resources examined are: Formal Legal Authority; Public Opinion; Information; Mobilizable Troops; and Financial Resources. In addition to this, the study used quantitative and qualitative methods to identify these resources. There are a couple of conclusions we may draw from this study. The method is useful in identifying power resources. It is not enough to use only the distribution of resources amongst coalitions in order to explain policy changes. It is found that the distribution of resources, coupled with coalition interaction, is enough to explain changes in Russian foreign policy. KEYWORDS: Advocacy Coalition Framework, Russia, Power Resources, Natural Gas WORDS: 24,368 Author: Robert Granlund Supervisor: Fredrik Bynander Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ............................................................................................................ 2 1.3 OUTLINE..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Population Change and the Sustainable Socio-Economic Development of Cities in North-West Russia
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BALTIC REGION TRENDS IN POPULATION CHANGE AND THE SUSTAINABLE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF CITIES IN NORTH-WEST RUSSIA A. A. Anokhin K. D. Shelest M. A. Tikhonova Saint Petersburg State University Received 21 November 2018 7—9 Universitetskaya emb., Saint Petersburg, Russia, 199034 doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-4-3 © Anokhin A. A., Shelest K. D., Tikhonova M. A., 2019 The Northwestern Federal District is a Russian macro-region that is a unique example of a model region. It accounts for 10 % of the country’s total area and 9.5 % of its population. This article aims to trace the patterns of city distribution across the region, to assess the conditions of differently populated cities and towns, and to identify sustainability trends in their socio-economic development. Population change is a reliable indicator of the competitiveness of a city. As a rule, a growing city performs well economically and has a favourable investment climate and high-paid jobs. The analysis revealed that population change occurred at different rates across the federal district in 2002—2017. A result of uneven socio-economic development, this irregularity became more serious as globalisation and open market advanced. The study links the causes and features of growth-related differences to the administrative status, location, and economic specialisation of northwestern cities. The migration behaviour of the population and the geoeconomic position are shown to be the main indicators of the sustainable development of a city. Keywords: cities, urban population, Northwestern Federal District, city classification, population, city sustainability Introduction When studying the urban population distribution and its dynamics over the past decades, it is necessary to take into account the territorial heterogeneity of To cite this article: Anokhin, A.
    [Show full text]
  • WCER Problems of Reforming Local Self Governance
    Consortium for Economic Policy Research and Advice WCER Canadian Association Institute Working Academy International of Universities for the Economy Center of National Development and Colleges in Transition for Economic Economy Agency of Canada Reform Problems of Reforming Local Selfgovernance: Structural and Financial Aspects Moscow 2005 УДК 352+336.132.11 ББК 65.050.2+65.261.8 P93 Problems of Reforming Local Selfgovernance: Structural and Financial Aspects. M.: IET, 2005. P. 421. Agency CIP RSL Team leader – I. Starodubrovskaya Authors: Chapters 1, 6–7, Introduction, Conclusion – I. Starodubrovskaya; Chapter 2 – I. Starodubrovskaya, M. Slavgorodskaya, T. Letunova; Chapters 3, 4 – M. Slavgorodskaya; Chapter 5 – I. Starodubrovskaya, M. Slavgorodskaya; Chapter 8 – I. Starodubrovskaya, N. Mironova; Chapter 9 – E. Slack, Consulting Inc., Canada; Chapters 10, 12 – H. Kitchen, Department of Economics, The Trent University, Canada; Chapter 11 – G. Gaboury, F. Vaillancourt, Department of Economics, The University of Montreal, Canada. The paper considers territorial models of local selfgovernance that had emerged in Russian regions prior to the reform and their impact on various aspects of municipal establishments' activities. The authors evaluate the regional law in the area of local selfgovernance and interbudgetary relations and consider issues associated with the rise and emergence of territorial foundations of the institute in question until 2003. The authors also analyze reforms undertaken in RF regions in 2004 that addressed the problem of a new territorial structure of local selfgovernance. Individual chapters highlight on international experiences in the area of organization and financing of local administrations. JEL Classification: H11, H70, H77, K10. Editors: Glavatskaya N., Mezentseva K., Serianova S.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Depth Analysis of the Situation of Working Street Children in the Leningrad Region 2001
    IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF THE SITUATION OF WORKING STREET CHILDREN IN THE LENINGRAD REGION 2001 ILO/IPEC WORKING PAPER INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON THE ELIMINATION OF CHILD LABOUR INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE ST.PETERSBURG Copyright © International Labour Organization 2002 First published 2002 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to the Publications Bureau (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered in the United Kingdom with the Copyright Licensing This report presents the results of a comprehensive study into the problem of working Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP [Fax: (+44) (0)20 7631 5500; email: [email protected]], street children, conducted in the Vsevolozhsk and Priozersk districts of the Leningrad in the United States with the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923 Region of Russia. It gives quantitative estimates and other data descriptive of working [Fax: (+1) (978) 750 4470; email: [email protected]] or in other countries with associated Reproduction street children in these districts, their occupations and conditions of work, and the Rights Organizations, may make photocopies in accordance with the licenses issued to them for this purpose. reasons that drive children to seek independent sources of income. It also provides an analysis of children’s attitudes and expectations. The report uses the results of ILO sociological surveys conducted in June through August 2000 on working street children In-depth analysis of the situation of working street children in the Leningrad Region 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Crafting a Green Future
    CRAFTING A GREEN FUTURE RUSAL ANNUAL REPORT 2019 REPORT ANNUAL RUSAL ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Contents CONTENTS Financial and Operational Highlights 3 Corporate Profile 7 Chairman’s Statement 15 CEO’s Review 18 Business Overview 21 Management Discussion and Analysis 45 Profiles of Directors and Senior Management 77 Directors’ Report 95 Corporate Governance Report 129 Financial Statements 145 Glossary 236 Appendix A 247 Principal terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement with the Company Appendix B 251 Principal terms of the Shareholders’ Agreement among Major Shareholders only Corporate Information 258 1 Annual Report RUSAL 2019 01 FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS Financial and Operational Highlights FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS USD million (unless otherwise 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 specified) Revenue 9,711 10,280 9,969 7,983 8,680 Adjusted EBITDA 966 2,163 2,120 1,489 2,015 Adjusted EBITDA Margin 9.9% 21.0% 21.3% 18.7% 23.2% EBIT 87 1,481 1,523 1,068 1,409 Share of Profits from Associates and 1,669 955 620 848 368 joint ventures Pre Tax Profit 1,054 1,953 1,288 1,354 763 Profit 960 1,698 1,222 1,179 558 Profit Margin 9.9% 16.5% 12.3% 14.8% 6.4% Adjusted Net(Loss)/ Profit (270) 856 1,077 292 671 Adjusted Net Profit (Loss)/Margin (2.8%) 8.3% 10.8% 3.7% 7.7% Recurring Net Profit 1,273 1,695 1,573 959 1,097 Basic Earnings Per Share 0.063 0.112 0.080 0.078 0.037 (in USD) Total Assets 17,814 15,777 15,774 14,452 12,809 Equity Attributable to Shareholders of 6,747 5,209 4,444 3,299 1,391 the Company Net Debt 6,466 7,442 7,648 8,421 8,372 Annual Report RUSAL 2019 4 Financial and Operational Highlights 5 Annual Report RUSAL 2019 02 CORPORATE PROFILE Corporate Profile CORPORATE PROFILE RUSAL is a low-cost, vertically integrated aluminium producer with core smelting operations located in Siberia, Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Report of the Interreg 2021-2027 South-East Finland – Russia Programme
    Environmental assessment report of the Interreg 2021-2027 South-East Finland – Russia Programme President _____________________ Mr. Nikolay Matsukov St-Petersburg 2021 Interreg 2021-2027 South-East Finland-Russia programme Environmental report Brukhanov A.U., Matsukov N.N., Vorobyeva E.A., Vasilev E.V., Oblomkova N.S. SPA ISH Version 30 June 2021 2 The Interreg 2021-2027 South-East Finland - Russia Programme is undergoing a strategic environmental assessment (SEA). The SEA procedure includes several phases: determination of the scope of the environmental assessment, preparation of an environmental report, which includes an assessment of risks from the implementation of the program, consultations / public hearings with environmental authorities and other stakeholders on the content of the environmental report, preparation of the SEA report based on the results of consultations / public hearings. One of the main parts of the SEA is the assessment of possible environmental risks and consequences during the implementation of the program. The task of the experts preparing the report is to assess how ecologically important problems for the region are reflected in the preparation of the program and how they will be taken into account in its further implementation. Such an assessment and the final recommendations of the SEA are extremely relevant, as they are taken into account when developing the final version of the program. 3 Content Introduction ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2009
    ANNUAL REVIEW and Summary Financial Statements 2009 PEOPLE, TECHNOLOGY, EFFICIENCY A new production center in the Uvat district in the south south the in district Uvat the in center production new A 2009 February in commissioned region Tyumen the of >> ABBREVIATIONS 2P (reserves) proved and probable (reserves) 3P (reserves) proved, probable, possible (reserves) APG associated petroleum gas B2B business to business DAFWC days away from work cases ESP electric submersible pump HSE health, safety and environment LOF life of field NGOs non-governmental organizations OFS oilfield services OGP The International Association of Oil and Gas Producers PRMS Petroleum Resources Management System RUR Russian roubles SEC Securities and Exchange Commission USD US dollars UNITS bbl barrel (1 bbl = 0.134 metric tons) boe barrel of oil equivalent bcm billion cubic meters bcma billion cubic meters per year bn billion ha hectare km kilometer mmboed million barrels of oil equivalent per day mbpd thousand barrels per day mmbpd million barrels per year CAUTIONARY STATEMENT This publication contains forward-looking state- ments regarding TNK-BP's assets and financial and operational performance and strategy. Actual results may differ depending on a variety of factors. SLAVNEFT TNK-BP shareholders own close to 50% of Slavneft, which is managed independently and reports as a separate entity. TNK-BP’s Net Income and EBITDA numbers include its share of Slavneft’s results. Any other figures quoted in this publica- tion exclude Slavneft unless stated otherwise. Contents 1. KEY EVENTS IN 2009 ................................................................. > 2 7. KEY FIGURES IN 2009 ............................................................ > 34 7.1: Health and safety data. > 34 2.
    [Show full text]