DOCSLIB.ORG

Seeger's Unitary Field Theory Reconsidered 142 Lawrence M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seeger's Unitary Field Theory Reconsidered 142 Lawrence M 131 Seeger 's Unitary Field Theory Reconsidered notion of a properly musical concept in greater detail in the latter half of this essay; in my own work it has been fundamental to addressing the question of how it is we structure our understanding of music and for developing an account of the relationship between language and music. Charles Seeger wrestled with the relationship between language and music throughout his long life. In 1913, only a year after he took charge 6 of starting a music program at Berkeley, he wrote, "The term 'Musicol- ogy' comprises, in its widest sense, the whole linguistic treatment of Seeger's Unitay Field Theoy Reconsidered music-the manual instruction, the historical study, the music-research \ of the psycho-physical laboratory, the piece of mugc criticism. Mu- Lawrence M. Zbikowski sic is not founded upon language or upon language studies. But its con- duct in our day depends customarily on an extensive use of language" (Seeger 1913: n.p.). In later years Seeger situated the paradox of music's dependence on language at the musicological juncture. Speaking to the Society for Ethno- musicology in 1976, Seeger described the musicological juncture as "the situation we place ourselves in when we talk about music and particu- larly when, as now, we talk about talking about music" (lgna:180). The essays of Seeger's final two decades repeatedly explored this situation, As musicians, we are aware of a certain tension between making music- examining the way speech was used generally, how it was applied to through composition, performance, or ritual-and talking about music. music specifically, and the differences and similarities between the two Making music is immediate, absorptive, and consuming, a torrent that modes of communication. Again and again he worried the problem of sweeps us along in its path. Talking about music walls in the torrent, and the ways in which speech and language (terms he used interchangeably) the trickle that remains sometimes scarcely resembles that which has constrain an understanding of music. However, in his proposal for a enraptured us. This opposition is not all there is to the relationship be- unitary field theory for musicology, which first appeared in print in 1970, tween language and music-the two modes of communication are far and then (with slight revisions) in Studies in Musicology, he suggested a too rich to submit to such a simple reduction-but it is central to under- reversal of conceptualization that was telling. Seeger argued, "It is true standing the tension between making music and talking about music. that speech and music are very unlike in many ways, but they are very This tension stems from two problems of the application of language (i.e., like in others. One can try to use agreement on the latter to help agree- natural language) to music. First, language is not very good for describ- ment upon the former's account of the latter" (1977~:104).'That is, knowl- ing processes. Language can be part of a process, as in the case of a play edge of music should be used to refine the way one applies language to or a poem, but that is another thing. In general what one gets out of an music. application of language to phenomena is the fixed and immutable, even , In the time that remained to him Seeger was unable to take full ad- in situations where neither is to be expected. Second, it must be recog- vantage of the reversal he proposed. However, as part of the groundwork nized that there are some concepts proper to music and distinct from for this proposal he outlined a system of independent yet related con- language. To explain a little: sound images are part of the central busi- ceptual domains that together formed what he called a unitary field. ness of what we call music. Part of what it means to be a musician is to Speech was one such domain, music another. Conceptual domains of a try to express things in sound that cannot be expressed in words. And strikingly similar sort have played an important role in recent accounts for these things that cannot be expressed in words-what I call properly of linguistic structure and appear to be important for understanding musical concepts--language is simply inadequate. I shall develop the cognition as a whole. In this chapter I would like to consider briefly the 132 Lawrence M. Zbikowski i 133 SeegerS Unitary Field Theory Reconsidered main points of Seeger's unitary field theory as he developed it for musi- f number of subuniverses. For the purposes of this chapter only the first cology and then offer an interpretation of aspects of this theory based on five subuniverses introduced by Seeger need be considered; the sixth, the recent research in linguistics and cognition. I shall also draw on some of subuniverse of value, is introduced much later in the dialogue and is not my recent work on the processes involved in conceptualizing music. essential to understanding the basic outlines of Seeger's unitary field What I hope to accomplish is a revitalization of Seeger's essential vision theory. The discussion of value also engages a host of important issues by considering closely the cognitive and semantic issues raised by talk- that occupied Seeger throughout his career but that are not central to the ing about music. concerns here. The first subuniverse proposed by Seeger is that of the physical, phe- nomenal, external world, the domain of science and fact, represented by Seeger's Unitary Field Theory a P on figure 6.1. The second subuniverse is that of discourse, or speech, Seeger gave the first version of his unitary field theory for musicology represented by an S on figure 6.1. This domain includes all three modes in a paper read in December 1944. The theory was to have had a func- of speech recognized by Seeger: the affective, or mystical; the reasoned, tion analogous to that of Einstein's unified field theory: the explicit task or logical; and the discoursive, or commonsensical (1976,1977b). The was the definition and systematization of musicology. Apparently no third subuniverse is that of music, represented by an M on figure 6.1. typescript of this paper has survived. However, an abstract was pub- Seeger argues "if there is a universe of speech, which is one way men lished in the Bulletin of the American Musicological Society (Seeger 1947). communicateby mediums of sound, why should there not be one of the and it is this abstract that served as a point of departure for the 1970 other mediums of communicating by sound-music? As musicians, we version of the theory, which was written as a dialogue between Seeger, know that music communicates something that speech does not" Boris Kremenliev, and a student named Jim Yo~t.~ (1977c:106-7). The fourth subuniverse is a personal one, a sort of half- Seeger began his definition and systematization of musicology with conscious, experiential domain just prior to, or perhaps just beyond, the notion of a "world view." Each person, he proposes, has a worldview, verbalization or representation. Seeger summons this domain with a a highly conceptualized account of how things appear, the product of rhetorical question: "When you run into a snag in what you are writing reflection on the world without and the world within. Although a world- about or are composing, don't you ever feel that there is a fund of knowl- view is taken to be "highly conceptualized" it is not necessarily system- edge, feelings, and purposes rumbling around inside you that is atic; in the unattributed prologue to the 1970 version of the theory, a i definitely yours and no one else's . ,but it is not quite in the order you worldview is described as "that which is not language" (Seeger 1970:171). < could wish it to be so as to enable you to clarify the passage you are f This description, and the perspective that it entails, is useful for under- 1 working on; and that by exploring it a bit deliberately or resting and let- standing the unitary field theory, and in the following the assumption ting yourself dream you either solve the problem satisfactorily or give is that a worldview is unsystematized and nonlinguistic. up and make a fresh start?" (107) This subuniverse is represented by an Extending the notion of a worldview a little, we can think of each I on figure 6.1. The fifth subuniverse is that of culture, which in its social scholarly discipline as incorporating a particular worldview of its own (Seeger 1977c:log).Although the concept of a worldview is easy enough to grasp, coming to terms with its empirical referent is rather more difficult. To facilitate the process, Seeger suggests the heuristic of a struc- tural universe, a complex of empirical entities to which the worldview refers. In brief, each structural universe comprises the plurality hidden in the apparent unity of its respective worldview. The structural universe also permits a systematic account, through language, of the nonlinguistic Figure 6.1. Seeger's representation of the subuniverses of the structural universe worldview. Thus the worldview of musicology has as its empirical ref- of musicology (Reprinted with permission from Charles Seeger, Studies in Musi- ! erent the structural universe of musicology, a universe that contains a cology, 1935-1975, 108, O 1977 by the Regents of the University of California) 134 Lawrence M. Zbikowski 135 Seeger's Unitay Field Theoy Reconsidered organization and traditions provides an essential framework for the very complex plurality is that the structural universe is itself made up of a possibility of music; it is represented by a C on figure 6.1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Cognitive Approach to Medieval Mode
    Empirical Musicology Review Vol. 3, No. 2, 2008 Commentary on “The Perception and Cognition of Time in Balinese Music” by Andrew Clay McGraw IAN CROSS, SATINDER GILL, SARAH KNIGHT, CHRIS NASH, TAL-CHEN RABINOWITCH, LYDIA SLOBODIAN, NETA SPIRO, GHOFUR WOODRUFF, and MATTHEW WOOLHOUSE[1] University of Cambridge ABSTRACT: We review the paper by Andrew Clay McGraw, noting that it represents an interesting and valuable contribution to the study of music in cognition in its informed exploration of non-western musical perceptions. We raise a number of concerns about the methods used, and make suggestions as to how the issues that were empirically addressed in the paper might have been tackled in ways that would have enhanced the interpretability of its findings. Submitted 2008 April 5; accepted 2008 April 14. KEYWORDS: experimental method, non-western music, collaborative research THIS fascinating paper takes as its starting point the idea that time in music and time in general, may be bound by culture in our conceptions, in particular, by processes of cross-domain mapping of the types that have been postulated as operational by ethnomusicologists, music theorists, and music psychologists. It explores by means of three experiments Becker's hypothesis that Balinese gamelan music reflects and perhaps embodies emic conceptions of time. The first uses an experimental paradigm known as the Implicit Association Test to investigate, by means of response times, the strengths of associations between musical and/or dance terms, music and/or instrument terms, and time and/or position terms, among Balinese musicians. It found evidence for a slight tendency for time-in music to be 'implicitly iconic' of time-in-general, though noted that the results showed high variability.
    [Show full text]
  • Giovanni Bennardo, Ph.D. Curriculum Vitae
    Giovanni Bennardo, Ph.D. Presidential Research Professor Curriculum Vitae Northern Illinois University Department of Anthropology Cognitive Studies Initiative and Environment, Sustainability and Energy Institute DeKalb, Illinois USA ph: (815) 753-8574 e-mail: [email protected] webpage: www.niu.edu/bennardo Place of Birth: Cosenza, Italy Country of Residence: US, since 1988 Country of Citizenship: Italy and US EDUCATION • Ph.D. Anthropology (Linguistic and Cognitive), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; May 1996. • M.A. in Linguistics (General and Applied), Ohio University, Athens; June 1987. • Laurea in Lingue e Letterature Straniere: English. Universitá di Pisa, Italy. Academic Interests Topical Interests: Linguistic and cognitive anthropology, knowledge representations, spatial cognition, cultural models, language and culture, language and space, cultural models of nature, conceptual semantics, Pacific navigation, Polynesian kinship, and social networks. Geographical Focus: Oceania, Polynesia, The Kingdom of Tonga. Dissertation Title: A Computational Approach to Spatial Cognition: Representing Spatial Relationships in Tongan Language and Culture. Sabbatical Leaves Professor (Linguistic and Cognitive Anthropology) Department of Anthropology and Cognitive Studies Initiative, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb; Spring semester, 2019 Presidential Research Professor (PRP) (Linguistic and Cognitive Anthropology) Department of Anthropology and Cognitive Studies Initiative, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb; Spring semester, 2015
    [Show full text]
  • Bradd Shore. Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 39 Article 9 Number 39 Fall 1998 10-1-1998 Bradd Shore. Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning. Palmer Talbutt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Recommended Citation Talbutt, Palmer (1998) "Bradd Shore. Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning.," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 39 : No. 39 , Article 9. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol39/iss39/9 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Talbutt: Bradd Shore. <em>Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Pro 97 BOOK REVIEWS Bradd Shore. Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. This is a remarkable book that will repay close study; it is by no means light bedtime reading. There are two poles to it, or more exactly, the second pole conflates two themes: "cognitive science" and late modernity. This interesting conflation comes off better, to my mind, than do Shore's heroic bridging efforts between cultural anthropology and recent cognitive science. He seems to attempt a tight-rope spanning of the Grand Canyon between Way Back When and Right Now. He was a Peace Corps member of astute abilities in Samoa, and followed up diligently into other anthropological researches. Then he was a student at Berkeley when the most current and extravagant ideas of psy- chology and symbolisms were bruited about.
    [Show full text]
  • Bradd Shore Curriculum Vitae September, 2012 PERMANENT ADDRESS: Department Anthropology Emory University Atlanta, Georgia 30322 (404) 727-4200
    Bradd Shore Curriculum Vitae September, 2012 PERMANENT ADDRESS: Department Anthropology Emory University Atlanta, Georgia 30322 (404) 727-4200 EDUCATION 1967 B.A. (English Literature, Summa Cum Laud). University of California, Berkeley. 1971 M.A. (Anthropology). Department of Anthropology, The University of Chicago. 1977 Ph.D. (Anthropology). Department of Anthropology, The University of Chicago. THESES, DISSERTATIONS, ADVISORS B.A. Honors Thesis (Berkeley). The Winters Tale: Shakespeare's Pastoral Care. John Anson, Advisor. 1967. M.A. Thesis (Chicago). Adoption, Alliance and Political Mobility in Samoa. David M. Schneider, Advisor. 1971. Ph.D. Dissertation (Chicago). A Samoan Theory of Action: Social Control and Social Order in a Polynesian Paradox. Raymond Fogelson, Marshall D. Sahlins, David M. Schneider, Advisors. 1977. MAJOR AREAS OF INTEREST IN ANTHROPOLOGY Cultural Anthropology; Cognitive Anthropology; Culture Theory; Myth, Ritual, Religion; Language and Culture; Kinship and Social Organization; Primitive Religion; Symbolic Processes; Samoa; Polynesia; Australian Aborigines, Anthropology and Literature; Psychological Anthropology; Culture and Technology; American Popular Culture. Ritual and Myth in American Family Life AWARDS, HONORS, FELLOWSHIPS, GRANTS 1963-4 Full Scholarship, Union College 1965-6 Alfred J. Sloan Scholarship, University of California, Berkeley 1966 Election to Senior Honor Society, University of California, Berkeley 1967 Election to Phi Beta Kappa, University of California, Berkeley 1970-1 Awarded Unendowed University
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Mead and the Culture of Forgetting in Anthropology: a Response to Paul Roscoe
    MICAELA Dl LEONARDO Margaret Mead and the Culture of Forgetting in Anthropology: A Response to Paul Roscoe Only connect. research, and write and speak. And this is what is curious about Paul Roscoe's piece: its anachronism, its radical lack —E. M. Forster of a sense of the historical shifts in anthropology and in the world, since Margaret Mead and Reo Fortune wrote EARLY A QUARTER CENTURY AGO, the late Eric about the Mountain Arapesh in the 1930s. Thus, while I NWolf published a ringing editorial in the New York appreciate Roscoe's long familiarity with Papua New Times titled "They Divide and Subdivide, and Call It An- Guinea (PNG) populations and his archival work, this lack thropology" (1980). Wolf's concern was the proliferation of "history and history of theory" connection means that of mutually uncommunicative subfields in our discipline both his framing of the question at hand and his empirical to the detriment of any overarching set of understandings claims leave much to be desired. Let me elaborate. of the human condition. He laid out his larger history-of- First, I certainly agree with Roscoe on the importance thought vision in Europe and the People without History of revisiting Margaret Mead's oeuvre. Mead is still, as I (1982), in which he argued for our discipline's release wrote in Exotics at Home, "the most well-known anthro- from the "bounds of its own definitions" in an historical pologist across this century in the United States, and prob- political-economic vision uniting the social sciences and ably the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Gleanings from Academic Gatherings
    History of Anthropology Newsletter Volume 28 Issue 2 December 2001 Article 9 January 2001 Gleanings From Academic Gatherings Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Recommended Citation (2001) "Gleanings From Academic Gatherings," History of Anthropology Newsletter: Vol. 28 : Iss. 2 , Article 9. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol28/iss2/9 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol28/iss2/9 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Whitehead. N.L. 2000. A history of research on warfare in anthropology-reply to Keith Otterbein. American Anthropologist I 02 :834-3 7 Yamauchi, E.M., ed. 2001 . Afiica and Afiicans in antiquity. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. Zamito, J.H. 2002. Kant Herder and the birth of anthropology. University ofChicago Press. Zimmerman, Andrew. 2001. Anthropology and antihmnanism in imperial Germany. University of Chicago Press. ABK= Alice Kehoe PF= Paul Friedrich CR = Chris Roth RDF= Raymond Fogelson EK= Esteban Krotz RH=Richard Handler WCS= William Sturtevant GLEANINGS FROM ACADEMIC GATHERINGS American Anthropological Association. The theme ofthe annual meeting in Washington, D.C. November 28-December 2, was "One Hundred Years of Anthropology," and the program was replete with sessions and papers relating in one way or another to the history of the discipline-too many, in fact, to attempt to list them all here in full detail. Sessions listed in the program index under the heading "History of Anthropology" were five in number: "Anthropology in the Margins: Hurston, Landes, Literaure, Folklore, Race, Renaissance," organized by Bradley Evans (Rutgers U.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Studies
    PACIFIC STUDIES A multidisciplinary journal devoted to the study of the peoples of the Pacific Islands JUNE 1996 Anthropology Archaeology Art History Economics Ethnomusicology Folklore Geography History Sociolinguistics Political Science Sociology PUBLISHED BY T HE INSTITUTE FOR POLYNESIAN STUDIES BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY-HAWAI‘I IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE POLYNESIAN CULTURAL CENTER EDITORIAL BOARD Paul Alan Cox Brigham Young University Roger Green University of Auckland Francis X. Hezel, S.J. Micronesian Seminar Rubellite Johnson University of Hawai‘i Adrienne Kaeppler Smithsonian Institution Robert Kiste University of Hawai‘i Robert Langdon Australian National University Stephen Levine Victoria University Barrie Macdonald Massey University Cluny Macpherson University of Auckland Leonard Mason University of Hawai‘i Malama Meleisea University of Auckland Norman Meller University of Hawai‘i Richard M. Moyle University of Auckland Colin Newbury Oxford University Douglas Oliver University of Hawai‘i Karen Peacock University of Hawai‘i Nancy Pollock Victoria University Seigio A. Rapu Easter Island Karl Rensch Australian National University Bradd Shore Emory University Yosihiko Sinoto Bishop Museum William Tagupa Honolulu, Hawai‘i Francisco Orrego Vicuña Universidad de Chile Edward Wolfers University of Wollongong Articles and reviews in Pacific Studies are abstracted or indexed in Sociolog- ical Abstracts, Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts, America: His- toy and Life, Historical Abstracts, Abstracts in Anthropology, Anthropo- logical Literature, PAIS Bulletin, International Political Science Abstracts, International Bibliography of Periodical Literature, International Bibliogra- phy of Book Reviews, and International Bibliography of the Social Sciences. PACIFIC STUDIES Editor DALE B. ROBERTSON Associate Editor Book Review Editor GLORIA L. CRONIN MAX E. STANTON Book Review Forum Editor Book Review Forum Editor ROBERT BOROFSKY LAMONT LINDSTROM Books Noted Editor Technical Editor RILEY M.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Diversity and Human Nature: the Life and Times of a False Dichotomy
    Human Diversity and Human Nature: The Life and Times of a False Dichotomy Bradd Shore Anthropology Department Emory University Atlanta, Georgia In Being Human, Neil Roughley, ed. , Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2001 1 I affirm, that if we consult History, both Ancient and Modern, and take a view of what has past in the World, we shall find that Human Nature since the fall of Adam has always been the same, and that the Strength and Frailties of it have ever been conspicuous in one part of thew Globe or another, without any regard to Ages, Climate or Religion . As Human nature always continues the same, as it has been for so many thousand years, so we have no great Reason to suspect a future Change in it, while the World endures. (Bernard Mandeville)1 It is very strange how certain modes of thought become general, and can, for some length of time, be maintained, and for long be regarded as something actually existing in human nature. (Johan Wolfgang Von Goethe)2 At first glance, it seems like a straightforward proposition. Anthropology is the study of human nature in light of human variation. Specifically, anthropologists focus on group variation, which, depending on the subfield of anthropology, entails some combination of biological, cultural or social differentiation. But what exactly does it mean to study human nature in light of human variation? A moment’s reflection suggests that defining human nature in light of human variation appears to be more a paradox than a simple definition. It defines not so much a discipline as a dilemma, one that has been at the heart of anthropology since its inception.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Divination and Decision
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Divination and Decision-Making: Ritual Techniques of Distributed Cognition in the Guatemalan Highlands A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology and Cognitive Science by John J. McGraw Committee in charge: Professor Steven Parish, Chair Professor David Jordan, Co-Chair Professor Paul Goldstein Professor Edwin Hutchins Professor Craig McKenzie 2016 Copyright John J. McGraw, 2016 All rights reserved. The dissertation of John J. McGraw is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Co-chair ___________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2016 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page …....……………………………………………………………… iii Table of Contents ………………….……………………………….…………….. iv List of Figures ….…………………………………………………….…….……. vii List of Tables …......……………………………………………………………… viii List of Maps ………………………………………………………….……….…. ix Acknowledgments …..………………………………………..………………….. x Vita .………………….………………………………….………..……………… xiii Abstract of the Dissertation ..……………………………………………………. xv Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION …….………………………………..................... 1 Theoretical Background …………….…………..….……………… 2 Distributed Cognition
    [Show full text]
  • Developments in Polynesian Ethnology
    Developments in Polynesian Ethnology Developments in Polynesian Ethnology Edited by Alan Howard and Robert Borofsky Open Access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities / Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. Licensed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 In- ternational (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits readers to freely download and share the work in print or electronic format for non-commercial purposes, so long as credit is given to the author. Derivative works and commercial uses require per- mission from the publisher. For details, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. The Cre- ative Commons license described above does not apply to any material that is separately copyrighted. Open Access ISBNs: 9780824881962 (PDF) 9780824881955 (EPUB) This version created: 20 May, 2019 Please visit www.hawaiiopen.org for more Open Access works from University of Hawai‘i Press. ©1989 University of Hawaii Press All rights reserved For Jan and Nancy CONTENTS Title Page ii Copyright 3 Dedication iv Acknowledgments vi 1. Introduction ALAN HOWARD AND ROBERT BOROFSKY 1 2. Prehistory PATRICK V. KIRCH 14 3. Social Organization ALAN HOWARD AND JOHN KIRKPATRICK 52 4. Socialization and Character Development JANE RITCHIE AND JAMES RITCHIE 105 5. Mana and Tapu BRADD SHORE 151 6. Chieftainship GEORGE E. MARCUS 187 7. Art and Aesthetics ADRIENNE L. KAEPPLER 224 8. The Early Contact Period ROBERT BOROFSKY AND ALAN HOWARD 257 9. Looking Ahead ROBERT BOROFSKY AND ALAN HOWARD 290 Bibliography 307 Contributors 407 Notes 410 v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A VARIETY of people contributed to the preparation of this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded From: Ebooks.Adelaide.Edu.Au/D/Descartes/Rene/D44dm/Part2.Html, Sept
    A History of Anthropology Eriksen HOA3 00 pre 1 16/04/2013 16:04 Anthropology, Culture and Society Series Editors: Professor Vered Amit, Concordia University and Dr Jon P. Mitchell, University of Sussex Published titles include: Claiming Individuality: Discordant Development: The Aid Effect: The Cultural Politics of Global Capitalism and the Giving and Governing in Distinction Struggle for Connection in International Development EDITED BY VERED AMIT AND Bangladesh EDITED BY DavID MOSSE AND NOEL DYCK KATY GARDNER DavID LEWIS Community, Cosmopolitanism Anthropology, Development Cultivating Development: and the Problem of Human and the Post-Modern An Ethnography of Aid Policy Commonality Challenge and Practice VERED AMIT AND KATY GARDNER AND DavID MOSSE NIGEL RAPPORT DavID LEWIS Contesting Publics Home Spaces, Street Styles: Border Watch: Feminism, Activism, Contesting Power and Identity Cultures of Immigration, Ethnography in a South African City Detention and Control LYNNE PHILLIPS AND SALLY COLE LESLIE J. BANK ALEXANDRA HALL Terror and Violence: In Foreign Fields: Corruption: Imagination and the The Politics and Experiences Anthropological Perspectives Unimaginable of Transnational Sport EDITED BY DIETER HALLER AND EDITED BY ANDREW STRATHERN, Migration CRIS SHORE PAMELA J. STEWART AND THOMAS F. CARTER Anthropology’s World: NEIL L. WHITEHEAD On the Game: Life in a Twenty-First Century Anthropology, Art and Women and Sex Work Discipline Cultural Production SOPHIE DAY ULF HANNERZ MAruškA SvašEK Slave of Allah: Humans and Other Animals Race
    [Show full text]
  • PACIFIC STUDIES a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Pacific-- Its
    PACIFIC STUDIES a journal devoted to the study of the Pacific-- its islands and adjacent countries JUNE 1992 Anthropology Archaeology Art History Ethnomusicology Folklore Geography History Sociolinguistics Political Science Sociology Published by THE INSTITUTE FOR POLYNESIAN STUDIES (Brigham Young University-Hawaii) Funded by the Polynesian Cultural Center EDITORIAL BOARD Paul Alan Cox Brigham Young University Roger Green University of Auckland Renée Heyum University of Hawaii Francis X. Hezel, S. J. Micronesian Seminar Rubellite Johnson University of Hawaii Adrienne Kaeppler Smithsonian Institution Robert Kiste University of Hawaii Robert Langdon Australian National University Stephen Levine Victoria University Barrie Macdonald Massey University Cluny Macpherson University of Auckland Leonard Mason University of Hawaii Malama Meleisea Canterbury University Norman Meller University of Hawaii Richard M. Moyle University of Auckland Colin Newbury Oxford University Douglas Oliver University of Hawaii Margaret Orbell Canterbury University Nancy Pollock Victoria University Karl Rensch Australian National University Bradd Shore Emory University Yosihiko Sinoto Bishop Museum William Tagupa Honolulu, Hawaii Francisco Orrego Vicuña Universidad de Chile Edward Wolfers University of Wollongong Articles and reviews in Pacific Studies are abstracted or indexed in Sociologi- cal Abstracts, Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts, America: His- tory and Life, Historical Abstracts, Abstracts in Anthropology, Anthropologi- cal Literature, PAIS Bulletin, International Political Science Abstracts, International Bibliography of Periodical Literature, International Bibliogra- phy of Book Reviews, and International Bibliography of the Social Sciences. Volume 15 June 1992 Number 2 CONTENTS Articles Graun Bilong Mipela: Local Land Courts and the Changing Customary Law of Papua New Guinea JEAN G. ZORN . 1 When Unity Is Torn Asunder: The Distressing Case of Thomas and Lucia Holman SANDRA WAGNER-WRIGHT .
    [Show full text]