Technical Assistance Layout with Instructions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Technical Assistance Layout with Instructions TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COMPLETION REPORT Division: SERC TA No. and Name: Amount Approved: $950,000 5850 – REG: Facilitating the Cross-Border Movement of Revised Amount: n/a Goods and People in the Greater Mekong Subregion Executing Agency: Source of Funding: TA Amount Undisbursed TA Amount Utilized ADB JSF: $950,000 $12,926.39 $937,073.61 Governments: $40,000 Date Completion Date Approval Signing Fielding of Consultants Original Actual 16 July 1999 N/A 11 October 1999 February 2001 31 December 2005 Closing Date Original Actual February 2001 26 April 2006 Description: The TA aimed to assist the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) countries in addressing major transport-related cross-border issues, thus enhancing trade and investment and ensuring that economic returns from subregional transport projects are maximized. Objectives and Scope: The RETA’s specific objectives were to (i) maintain the momentum of cooperation between and among the GMS countries and reinforce the subregional consultative process, (ii) promote the formulation and implementation of agreements that would allow the freer flow of goods and people, and (iii) further the development of subregional transport. These objectives were to be accomplished by: (i) assisting Cambodia and Viet Nam to prepare annexes and protocols for their bilateral agreement; (ii) assisting PRC, Lao PDR, Myanmar, and Thailand to prepare and finalize a quadrilateral agreement for the then proposed Chiang-Rai-Kunming Transport Corridor Project; (iii) assisting PRC, Lao PDR, Myanmar, and Thailand to finalize the annexes and protocols to their quadrilateral agreement; (iv) assisting Lao PDR, Thailand, and Viet Nam to finalize the annexes and protocols to their trilateral agreement; and (v) preparing CBTA annexes to cover all the GMS countries. Evaluation of Inputs: The RETA was developed as a follow-up to RETAs 5686 and 5749, which provided assistance to GMS countries in drafting, negotiating, and finalizing the GMS Cross-Border Transport Agreement (CBTA) involving Thailand, Lao PDR, and Viet Nam. To complement the achievements made under previous assistance, the RETA provided resources to support the accession of Cambodia, PRC and Myanmar to the CBTA. The RETA also assisted the GMS countries in drafting 20 annexes and protocols, which provided technical details to the CBTA. These annexes and protocols were prepared in consultation with other relevant agencies, such as the United Nations Economic and Social Commission in Asia and the Pacific, and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, to ensure that they were in line with the substantive provisions of relevant international conventions, such as Convention on Road Traffic, Convention on Road Signs/Signals, and Customs Convention on Road Traffic. A consulting firm was engaged to help implement the activities of the RETA. The consultants engaged provided the necessary expertise to support the different aspects of the RETA and overall their performance was very satisfactorily. The use of the same consultants as in previous RETAs helped provide the continuity to the process, and gave a comfort level to the participating countries regarding the consistency of approach adopted. Evaluation of Outputs: The RETA successfully accomplished all the major tasks. The GMS Cross-Border Transport Agreement (CBTA) was finalized and signed by Transport Ministers of Lao PDR, Thailand, and Viet Nam in November 1999. In November 2001, Cambodia acceded to the CBTA, PRC in November 2002, and Myanmar in September 2003. The CBTA was ratified by all six countries and entered into force in December 2003. Consultations with GMS countries and international organizations were conducted to prepare the required annexes and protocols to the CBTA. The RETA also supported the initial implementation of the CBTA through the conduct of tripartite meetings to finalize Memorandum of Understanding to implement the CBTA at five border crossing points (i) Lao Bao - Dansavanh; (ii) Aranyaprathet - Poipet; (iii) Mukdahan - Savanakhet; (iv) Mae Sai - Tachilek; and (v) Mae Sot - Myawaddy. Initial implementation commenced at Lao Bao - Dansavanh on 31 June 2005. Initial implementation at Mukdahan – Savanakhet and Poipet – Aranyaprathet, is scheduled to commence in early 2007. The original completion date of the RETA was extended to 31 December 2005 as a result of an expansion of the RETA’s scope to accommodate the important evolving needs of the GMS countries and to respond to their domestic approval procedure timelines in this sensitive area. Overall Assessment and Rating: Overall, the TA is assessed to be very successful. The RETA’s objectives have been met and the envisaged outputs were achieved. It also contributed significantly to the accession of Cambodia, PRC, and Myanmar to the GMS Cross-Border Transport Agreement. The RETA fulfilled targeted objectives in providing assistance to the countries in preparing the annexes and protocols of the GMS CBTA. Major Lessons Learned. Among the significant lessons learned are: (i) the critical importance of strong commitment of the member country governments in promoting cross-border movement of goods and people; (ii) that a strong national coordination mechanism is important where various line ministries and agencies are involved; and (iii) the overall coordinating role of ADB is very important. Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions: It is recommended that ADB continue to provide assistance to coordinate the implementation of the CBTA, as a successful outcome will have far-reaching benefits for the GMS region. Prepared by Yu-Shu Feng Designation Senior Regional Cooperation Economist .
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 Leterature Review
    CHAPTER 2 LETERATURE REVIEW The contents in this chapter were divided into five parts as follows: 1. Data from Aranyaprathet Customs House 2. A description of Ban Klongluek Border Market 3. Stressor 4. Stress 4.1 Definition of stress 4.2 The concept of stress 4.3 Stress evaluation 4.4 Stress related outcomes 5. Stress management 5.1 The concept of coping 5.2 The concept of stress management Data from Aranyaprathet Customs House The data from Information and Communication Technology, by the cooperation of Thailand Custom House indicates that overall business on the borderland of Thailand have increased every year by millions of baht since 1997. Comparison between all Thailand -Cambodia business shows borderland International business is 75% of all International business between Thailand and Cambodia as show table 2-1. Borderland businesses are mainstays of economy in this area of country. Sakaeo Province is an eastern province of Thailand where has the boundary contacts with the Cambodia. In 2007, Aranyaprathet Custom House and Chanthaburi Custom House had total trade value 18,468 and 14,432 million baht, respectively. This market has a lot of tourists, about 10,000 persons per day, circulating funds of about 100-200 million baht as show table 2-2 and table 2-3. 10 Table 2-1 Comparison between International business is Thailand-Cambodia business and Thailand -Cambodia business borderland (1997-2007) Year International Border Line Amount* % Amount* % 1997 11,825 100 8,271 70 1998 13,413 100 10,041 75 1999 13,939 100 10,496 75 2000 14,230
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Logistics
    MYANMAR TRADE FACILITATION THROUGH LOGISTCS CONNECTIVITY HLA HLA YEE BITEC , BANGKOK 4.9.15 [email protected] Total land area 677,000sq km Total length (South to North) 2,100km (East to West) 925km Total land boundaries 5,867km China 2,185km Lao 235km Thailand 1,800km Bangladesh 193km India 1,463km Total length of coastline 2,228km Capital : Naypyitaw Language :Myanmar MYANMAR IN 2015 REFORM & FAST ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS SIGNIFICANT POTENTIAL CREDIBILITY AMONG ASEAN NATIONS GATE WAY “ CHINA & INDIA & ASEAN” MAXIMIZING MULTIMODALTRANSPORT LINKAGES EXPEND GMS ECONOMIC TRANSPORT CORRIDORS EFFECTIVE EXTENSION INTO MYANMAR INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTION TRADE AND LOTISGICS SUPPLY CHAIN TRANSPARENCY & PREDICTABILITY LEGAL & REGULATORY FREAMEWORK INFRASTUCTURE INFORMATION CORRUPTION FIANACIAL SERVICE “STRENGTHEING SME LOGISTICS” INDUSTRIAL ZONE DEVELOPMENT 7 NEW IZ KYAUk PHYU Yadanarbon(MDY) SEZ Tart Kon (NPD) Nan oon Pa han 18 Myawadi Three pagoda Existing IZ Pon nar island Yangon(4) Mandalay Meikthilar Myingyan Yenangyaing THI LA WAR Pakokku SEZ Monywa Pyay Pathein DAWEI Myangmya SEZ Hinthada Mawlamyaing Myeik Taunggyi Kalay INDUSTRIES CATEGORIES Competitive Industries Potential Industries Basic Industries Food and Beverages Automobile Parts Agricultural Machinery Garment & Textile Industrial Materials Agricultural Fertilizer Household Woodwork Minerals & Crude Oil Machinery & spare parts Gems & Jewelry Pharmaceutical Electrical & Electronics Construction Materials Paper & Publishing Renewable Energy Household products TRANSPORT
    [Show full text]
  • The Transport Trend of Thailand and Malaysia
    Executive Summary Report The Potential Assessment and Readiness of Transport Infrastructure and Services in Thailand for ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) Content Page 1. Introduction 1.1 Rationales 1 1.2 Objectives of Study 1 1.3 Scopes of Study 2 1.4 Methodology of Study 4 2. Current Status of Thailand Transport System in Line with Transport Agreement of ASEAN Community 2.1 Master Plan and Agreement on Transport System in ASEAN 5 2.2 Major Transport Systems for ASEAN Economic Community 7 2.2.1 ASEAN Highway Network 7 2.2.2 Major Railway Network for ASEAN Economic Community 9 2.2.3 Main Land Border Passes for ASEAN Economic Community 10 2.2.4 Main Ports for ASEAN Economic Community 11 2.2.5 Main Airports for ASEAN Economic Community 12 2.3 Efficiency of Current Transport System for ASEAN Economic Community 12 3. Performance of Thailand Economy and Transport Trend after the Beginning of ASEAN Economic Community 3.1 Factors Affecting Cross-Border Trade and Transit 14 3.2 Economic Development for Production Base Thriving in Thailand 15 3.2.1 The analysis of International Economic and Trade of Thailand and ASEAN 15 3.2.2 Major Production Bases and Commodity Flow of Prospect Products 16 3.2.3 Selection of Potential Industries to be the Common Production Bases of Thailand 17 and ASEAN 3.2.4 Current Situation of Targeted Industries 18 3.2.5 Linkage of Targeted Industries at Border Areas, Important Production Bases, 19 and Inner Domestic Areas TransConsult Co., Ltd. King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi 2T Consulting and Management Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • 11661287 31.Pdf
    The Study on the Integrated Regional Development Plan for the Northeastern Border Region in the Kingdom of Thailand Sector Plan: Chapter16 Transportation CHAPTER 16 TRANSPORTATION 16.1 International and Inter-Urban Transport System of Thailand 16.1.1 National Highway System in Thailand The DOH1 network of national highways has a total route length of approximately 55,000 km, of which there are about 20,000 km of 1-, 2- and 3-digit roads and 30,000 km of 4-digit roads. All provinces (changwats) are connected to this network and most long-distance (inter-province) traffic uses these roads. Table 16.1 Highway Classification by Numbering System 1-digit route Highway Route No.1: Bangkok - Chiangrai (Phaholyothin Road) Highway Route No.2: Saraburi - Nongkai (Friendship Road) Highway Route No.3: Bangkok - Trad (Sukhumvit Road) Highway Route No.4: Bangkok - Amphoe Sadao, Songkla (Petchkasem Road) 2- digit route Primary highway in the regions 3-digit route Secondary highway in the regions 4-digit route Highway linking Changwat and Amphoe or important places in that province. Source: Department of Highways, Ministry of Transport and Communications 1 Department of Highway, Ministry of Transport and Communication, Thailand 16-1 PLANET NESDB - JICA Table 16.2 Highway Classification by Jurisdiction (1) Special Highway and Highways registered at the Department of Highways (DOH) by the order of National Highway the Director-General with the approval of the Minister. Highways registered at the Department of Highways (DOH) by the order of (2) Concession Highways the Director-General with the approval of the Minister. Roads registered at Provincial City Hall by the order of the Governor with (3) Rural Roads the consent of the Director-General of the Public Works, Department of the Secretary-General of the Office of the Accelerated Rural Development.
    [Show full text]
  • 8.3.2 Feature of the Industrial Town
    The Study on the Integrated Regional Development Plan for the Northeastern Border Region in the Kingdom of Thailand Sector Plan: Chapter 8 Industry 8.3.2 Feature of the Industrial Town Organization of I-san is divided by three regions by each Ministry and Agency, because of the supporting system of hierarchy. Roughly speaking, southwest center and gate city is Nakhon Ratchashima, southeast center is Ubon Ratchathani and Northwest center is Khon Kaen. Four provinces in northeast I-san are divided into two groups. Nakhon Phanom and Mukdahan belong to Ubon Ratchathani of the Southeast and Sakon Nakhon and Kalasin belong to the Khon Kaen of Northwest center. Since the four provinces are far from the center city, they could not receive full support from the center. Even that Khon Kaen and Ubon Ratchathani are the centers of the regions, they themselves also require economic support. Eventually, four provinces should be developing themselves (see Figure 8.9). Figure 8.9 Functions of Four Provincial Towns But a careful consideration of this region indicates that I-san region should be divided into four sub-regions. Northeast region of four provinces should be joined together and establish a new regional community. Sakon Nakhon should be considered as the center because of the following reasons: · Sakon Nakhon is the biggest economic town among the four provinces; · It is the geographical center among the four provinces; 8-49 PLANET NESDB - JICA · It has a well-developed industrial infrastructure of airport and road network among the four provinces; and · Sakon Nakhon has a potential for Agro-Science City with agricultural activities of R&D institute and universities.
    [Show full text]
  • MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) Cross-Border Exchange Information
    MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) Cross-Border Exchange Information MBDS Foundation Secretariat MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) MBDS XB Model,,p Sites and Report Format MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) CHINA 9 16 4 17 23 LAOS 2 12 MYANMAR 22 VIETNAM 1 5 7 10 11 3 8 14 13 18 21 25 24 19 Start 2003 Start 2008 Start 2009 THAILAND 6 15 20 CAMBODIA Start 2011 From 2012 MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) 1. Savannakhet (Laos) - Mukdaharn (Thailand) 14. Mae Sot (Thailand) - Myawaddy (Myanmar) 2. Savannakhet (Laos) - Quang Tri (Vietnam) 15. Chanthaburi (Thailand) – Battambang and Pailin 3. Champasak (Laos) - Stung Treng (Cambodia) (Cam bo dia ) 4. Luang Namtha (Laos) - Mengla (China) 16. Lang Son (Vietnam) – Ping Xiang (China) 5. Bo Kaeo (Laos) - Chiang Rai (Thailand) 17. Quang Ninh (Vietnam) – Dong Xiang (China) 6. Sakaeo (Thailand) - Banteay Meacheay 18. Svay Rieng (Cambodia) - Tay Ninh (Vietnam) (Cambodia) 19. Kampong Cham (Cambodia) - Tay Ninh 7. Takaeo (Cambodia) - An Giang (Vietnam) (Vietnam) 8. Kampot (Cambodia) - Kien Giang (Vietnam) 20. Koh Kong (Cambodia) - Trat (Thailand) 9. Lai Chau (VIET) - Jinping (CHI-Y) 21. Kammouane (Laos) - Nakorn Phanom (Thailand) 10. Chiang Rai (Thailand) - Tachilek (Myanmar) 22. Khammouane (Laos) - Quang Ninh (Vietnam) 11. Champasak (Laos) - Ubon Ratchathani 23. Mong Cai (Vietnam) – Dong Xing(China) (()Thailand) 24. Nan (()Thailand) – Sayyy()abury (Laos) 12. Borikhamxay (Laos) - Ha Tinh (Vietnam) 25. Kawthaung(Myanmar) – Ranong (Thailand) 13. Vientiane (Laos) - Nongkhai (Thailand)
    [Show full text]
  • The Kingdom of Thailand Updated Information
    1 THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND UPDATED INFORMATION PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 7, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF THE USE, STOCKPILING, PRODUCTION AND TRANSFER OF ANTI-PERSONEL MINES AND ON THEIR DESTRUCTION SUBMITTED 30 APRIL 2019 COVERING THE PERIOD 1 JANUARY 2018 TO 31 DECEMBER 2018 -------------------------------------------------- A. National implementation Measures No additional legal, administrative and other measures were taken during the previous calendar year to prevent and suppress any activity prohibited under the Convention. Please see the report submitted in 2015 for additional measures that Thailand has undertaken. B. Stockpiled anti-personnel mines On 24 April 2003, Thailand destroyed all anti-personnel mines in its stockpile, therefore, there has been no measures further taken on this matter. Please see the report submitted in 2015 for information previously provided on this matter. 2 C. Anti-personnel mines retained or transferred for permitted purposes RTAFOD - Royal Thai Air Force Ordnance Department RTAOD - Royal Thai Army Ordnance Department TBPPH - Thai Border Patrol Police Headquarters Authorised Institution Type Quantity Retained Lot Numbers RTAFOD M 14 575 LOT.NO.LOP-15-32 RTAOD M 26 1,601 N/A RTAOD Type 72 94 N/A RTAOD PMN 4 N/A RTAOD Type 69 800 N/A TBPPH M 14 12 N/A TBPPH M 16 E3 7 N/A TBPPH VAR 40 20 N/A TBPPH M2 A4 B2 20 N/A Total 3,133 During the course of 2018, mines were used or destroyed as follows: Authorised Institution Type Quantity Used Lot Numbers Actual Used RTAFOD M14 2 LOT.NO.LOP-15-32 Training/Disposal TBPPH M16 E3 10 N/A Training/Disposal RTAOD M26 16 N/A Training/Disposal RTAOD M2 1 N/A Disposal Total 29 3 D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vulnerability Report
    The Vulnerability Report Human Trafficking in the Greater Mekong Sub-region A study of migration-related knowledge and behaviours to inform World Vision’s ‘End Trafficking in Persons’ Program 01 This report presents the main findings of a study carried out in the countries participating in World Contents Vision’s End Trafficking in Persons Project: Cambodia, Overview 02 China, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam. It was Background 03 designed and coordinated by World Vision Australia and World Vision East Asia Regional Office. National Objectives 03 level assessments were carried out by project staff Methods 04 in each country as well as a consultant. We would Findings & Considerations 06 specifically like to acknowledge the contribution of the — Knowledge about human trafficking in source communities based in Cambodia, Regional Program Manager, John Whan Yoon and the Laos, Myanmar and Vietnam 07 country teams. We are very grateful for the invaluable — Policy/Programming Considerations 07 contributions of World Vision Australia, particularly — Migration experience 08 Emma Pritchard and Nami Kurimoto, as well as — Policy/Programming Considerations 09 Meagan Price, Annabel Hart, Kate Horwood, Melissa — Potentially protective behaviours 10 Stewart and Julie Smith. Special thanks to our Technical — Policy/Programming Considerations 10 Advisors: Dr. Cathy Zimmerman and Dr. Ligia Kiss, — Knowledge, attitudes and practices among Thai people living in ‘destination’ communities 11 Gender Violence and Health Centre, London School of — Policy/Programming Considerations 12 Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Next Steps 12 Except as acknowledged by the references in this — Future exploration 12 document to other authors and publications, the — Innovation in measuring efforts to reduce vulnerability 12 information described herein consists of World Vision’s Glossary & Working Definition of Terms 13 own work and the communities where the survey took place.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Analysis of Mukdahan Special Economic Zone
    i Situation analysis of Mukdahan Special Economic Zone Submitted to Thailand Environmental Institute Supported by Urban Climate Resilience in Southeast Asia Prepared by Assistant Prof. Dr. Arika Bridhikitti Faculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahasarakham University, Thailand July 15, 2016 ii Table of Contents Chapter 1 Understanding urban system of the Mukdahan Special Economic Zone .................................................................... 1 1.1. Introduction to Mukdahan Special Economic Zone .................................................................................. 1 1.2. Geography and land covers ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Demography and administration .............................................................................................................. 5 1.4. Economics ............................................................................................................................................... 6 1.5. Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................................... 7 1.6. Natural Resources .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.7. Environmental situation ......................................................................................................................... 12 1.8. Security issues
    [Show full text]
  • MBDS Activities
    Mekong Basin Disease Surveillance (MBDS) MBDS Foundation Secretariat MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) MBDS Cross Border Meeting Between Guang Tri (()Vietnam) and Savannakhet (()Laos)QQguang Tri,,, Vietnam 12 August, 2004 MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) Workshop for Stakeholders to Prevent & Control of Dengue fever Savannakhet (()Laos) on 23 February, 2005 MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) MBDS Annual Coordinating & Executive Board Meeting Bangg,kok, Thailand 8 - 10 June, 2005 MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) MBDS Cross Border Meeting Between Savannakhet (Laos) and Mukdahan(Thailand) At Savannakhet(Laos) on 5 --66 August, 2005 MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) MBDS Coordinating Committee Meeting Hanoi, Vietnam 15 – 16 December, 2005 MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) MBDS Executive Board & Coordinating Committee Meeting Bangg,kok, Thailand 20 - 21 February, 2006 MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) Seminars on SARS & Avian Influenza for staff at the Border Cheek points Champasack,,, Laos, 4 ––66 March,,, 2006 MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) MBDS Executive Board & Coordinating Committee Meeting Siem Reap, Cambodia 1 --33 June, 2006 MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) National TTXs Photos MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) MBDS 5 Countries XB Conference Mukdahan, Thailand 23 - 24 August, 2006 MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) MBDS Pandemic Influenza Tabletop Exercise Siem Reap, Cambodia 13 - 14 March, 2007 MEKONG BASIN DISEASE SURVELLANCE (MBDS) MBDS Executive Board & Coordinating
    [Show full text]
  • 1 October 1, 2018 Mr. Sung Chang Director for Innovation And
    October 1, 2018 Mr. Sung Chang Director for Innovation and Intellectual Property Office of the United States Trade Representative 600 17th Street NW Washington, D.C. 20508 RE: 2018 Special 301 Out-of-Cycle Review of Notorious Markets Docket Number: USTR-2018-0027 Submitted electronically at: www.regulations.gov Dear Mr. Chang: On behalf of the member companies of the American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA), we appreciate this opportunity to submit comments to the United States Trade Representative’s (USTR) 2018 Special 301 Out-of-Cycle Review of Notorious Markets. We are grateful to USTR for its strong and unfaltering commitment to the protection of American intellectual property rights around the world. AAFA is the national trade association representing apparel, footwear, travel goods, and other sewn products companies, and their suppliers, which compete in the global market. Representing more than 1,000 world famous name brands, AAFA is the trusted public policy and political voice of the apparel and footwear industry, its management and shareholders, its nearly four million U.S. workers, and its contribution of $384 billion in annual U.S. retail sales. AAFA’s Brand Protection Council (BPC) vigorously pursues brand protection efforts, with a focus on the global war against counterfeit apparel, footwear, accessories and other supplier products. Stolen intellectual property costs our members billions in lost sales, damage to brand reputation, and substantial legal expenses. Ultimately, these costs lead to U.S. job losses and higher costs for U.S. consumers. On this note, we would like to highlight our concerns over the recent imposition of tariffs under Section 301, specifically as they may stimulate trade of counterfeit goods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Slavery Route of Trans-Border Labor from Mae Sot To
    How to Transport Illegal Migrants?: The Slavery Route of Trans-border labor from Mae Sot to Inner Area** 1 2 Bandan Buadaeng and Patcharin Sirasoonthorn 1 Denlek Police Station, Uttaradit Provincial Police 2 Faculty of Social Sciences, Naresuan University Abstract This study analyzes the transportation of illegal Myanmar labor from Mae Sot to inner area. Qualitative research was conducted using the investigative technique, which includes “spies” and “intelligence”. To identify key mechanisms of illegal labors, several groups of illegal laborers and their agents were interviewed. Data were collected by in-depth interviews coupled with illegal immigration case reports by state officers. The researchers adopted a triangulation method to verity data before analysis consisting of: illegal laborers, agencies, and reports from state officers. This study revealed that the transportation process for Burmese illegal trans-border labors (BITLs) occurred in three main areas. These included: 1) the entry point or the gateway, Mae Sot District, Tak province was the major entry point; 2) on the Asia Highway route AH 1, at least 2 different methods of the transportation were employed, the revealing method in which the transportation of BITLs were openly transported because the transporters, or the agencies, periodically paid state officials. And the concealing method which was employed to avoid inspection where they paid immediately if they were arrested by state officers. This method can be divided into 5 categories including: hiding in vehicle, creating special hidden space in vehicle, hiding among goods or produces, disguising themselves as Thais, and using different varieties of transportation (e.g., by vehicle and by foot).
    [Show full text]