Leo Strauss, Erich Auerbach – Transformed Modern Intellectual History”)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Leo Strauss, Erich Auerbach – Transformed Modern Intellectual History”) David Weinstein Avihu Zakai EXILE AND INTERPRETATION: REINVENTING EUROPEAN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY IN THE AGE OF GERMAN TYRANNY AND BARBARISM (Or “How German-Speaking Jewish Intellectual Exiles – Hans Baron, Karl Popper, Leo Strauss, Erich Auerbach – Transformed Modern Intellectual History”) 2 ABSTRACT Introduction: Exile, Confrontation and Interpretation ……….……..……………………. 5 Our Introduction sets out some of our study’s main themes (exile, Jewish identity, hermeneutics, intellectual crises in Germany and Austria in the 1930s and scholarly combat). It also addresses some vexing philosophical problems of textual interpretation raised by our study. I. Hans Baron: Humanism and Republican Liberty in an Age of Tyranny and Barbarism …………………………………………………………………...……. 8 In this chapter, we inquire how the crisis of German ideology -- the triumph of völkish ideology - - contributed to the making of Baron’s seminal The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance, to his invention of the concept “civic humanism” and how a deep sense of general crisis pervaded his historical thought overall. II. Karl Popper and the Re-Invention of the History of Political Thought .………………. 94 Our chapter on Popper shows how he also joined idiosyncratic history of political thought and unusual hermeneutics to battle historicism of a different kind, which he likewise claimed helped cause fascism. III. Leo Strauss: The Exile of Interpretation …………………………………………..… 154 This chapter explores how Strauss combined idiosyncratic history of political thought with idiosyncratic hermeneutics to oppose historicism, which he claimed Machiavelli and Hobbes invented, the German Historical School perfected and fascism appropriated. IV. Erich Auerbach and the Crisis of German Philology: An Apology for the Western Judaeo-Christian Humanist Tradition in an Age of Peril, Tyranny, and Barbarism …………………………………………………………………………. 218 This chapter analyzes the great philologist’s works and life of the mind in the wide ideological, philological, and historical context of his time. Auerbach’s struggle as a humanist philologist is examined against the völkisch, chauvinist, racist, and anti-Semitic premises of Aryan philology, which eliminated the Hebrew Bible, or Old Testament, from German culture in particular and Western culture and civilization in general. He constructed his apology for, or justification of, the Western Judaeo-Christian humanist tradition at its gravest existential moment. V. Conclusion: Jewish Identity and Historical Imagination ……………………..…… 331 Our concluding chapter reiterates our study’s main conclusions, including especially our conviction that the seminal works of these prominent German-speaking intellectuals cannot possibly be understood properly without setting them in the interlocking contexts of anti- Semitism, anti-historicism and polemical combat against fascism. 3 CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction: Exile, Confrontation and Interpretation .......................................................... 5 I. Hans Baron: Humanism and Republican Liberty in an Age of Tyranny and Barbarism ……………………………………………………………….…………. 8 Introduction …………………………………………….………..…………...............…. 9 Hedgehogs and Foxes: Baron and the Early Italian Renaissance .……...………….…. 19 Life and Study in Weimar Germany ………………………………………………….. 27 An Epiphany at Florence – The Discovery of ‘Civic Humanism’ ……..……….……... 48 Exile …………………………………………………………………………………… 62 Exile and Interpretation: The Making of The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance …………………………………………………………………… 76 Epilogue …………………………………………………………………………….…. 88 II. Karl Popper and the Re-Invention of the History of Political Thought …………..…… 94 Introduction ….…………………………………………………………………........... 94 Fighting Fascism and the Power of Ideas …………..…………………………...….… 95 Ambivalence and Assimilation ………………………………………..……….…....… 98 Being a Jew and Being of Jewish Origin ……………………………………….…...... 104 Historicism and Totalitarianism: Arguing ‘From the Concentration Camp’ .…...…… 107 Critical Rationalism and Critical Interpretation …………………………………....... 115 Plato ………………………………………………………………………………..... 126 Hegel and Marx …………….………..……………………………..…………….…. 135 Ideology and Anachronism …………………………………………………………... 141 Popper and Berlin …………………………………………………………………… 143 Conclusion ……………….………………………………………………………….. 151 III. Leo Strauss: The Exile of Interpretation ……….………………….……………….... 154 Introduction …………………….……………………………………………….…… 154 Crisis and the Cave of Historicism ………………………….…….………………… 158 ‘Natural Understanding’ ……………………………………….….………………… 166 Reading Exactly .................................................................................................. 172 Interpreting Hobbes in the 1930s ……………………………………………………. 176 The Poison Pill of Hobbes ………………………………………………………..…. 190 Atheism With a “Good Conscience” ……………………………………….……….. 194 “Platonic” Liberalism …………………………………………………………….…. 199 Philosophical History, Exegetical Magic and the Continuing Crisis of Modernity …. 207 Reading Exactly, Textual Autonomy and the Crisis of Modernity ………………... 210 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………….. 215 4 IV. Erich Auerbach and the Crisis of German Philology: An Apology for the Western Judaeo-Christian Humanist Tradition in an Age of Peril, Tyranny, and Barbarism ….………………………………………………..….…. 218 Abstract …………………………………….…………………………………….… 218 Preface ……………………………………………..…………………………….…. 219 Philology and Humanism ……………………………….……………………….…. 222 Philology and History …………………………………………..…………………... 231 Philology and Ideology ………………………………………………..………….… 239 Erich Auerbach: Life, Time, and Works ……………………………………..……... 244 The Crisis of German Philology: Aryan Philology and the Elimination of the Old Testament ……………………………………………………….. 254 Exile and Interpretation: The Struggle against Aryan Philology and Nazi Barbarism ……………………………………………….…………….. 273 Epiphany in Istanbul ………………………………………………………… 279 Philology, Teleology, and Historicist Humanism ……………………..…… 287 Mimesis – An Apology for Western Judaeo-Christian Humanist Tradition in an Age of Peril, Tyranny and Barbarism ……………………… 294 The Real, Geist, and History ……………………………….………………… 296 Mimesis: Form and Content ……………………………………………..…… 304 Mimesis: Method and Approach ……………………………………..……… 314 Epilogue: Exile, Interpretation and Alienation ………………………………..……. 321 Conclusion: Jewish Identity and Historical Imagination …………………………..…..… 331 5 INTRODUCTION Exile and Interpretation contextualizes ideologically and politically Hans Baron, Erich Auerbach, Leo Strauss and Karl Popper’s scholarship. These German-speaking Jewish intellectuals, who are not normally considered together, fled continental Europe with the rise of Nazism in the 1930s. For each, the political calamity of European fascism was simultaneously a profound intellectual crisis. We choose these four refugee intellectuals not only because of their shared existential experience as exiled Jews, but, most importantly, because they exemplify how scholarship was often used polemically in the 1930s and 1940s to fight Nazism and fascism. We especially want to show how scholarship of an arcane character was enlisted in this struggle. We want to complement work that has been done, for instance, on Jacob Talmon or Hannah Arendt whose polemical intentions are more obvious or more well-known. Auerbach fought fascism through his rejection of Aryan philology, Baron by his repudiation of völkisch ideology of history, Strauss via his polemic against Hobbes’s historicism as the source of modern German political nihilism and Popper by attacking Plato’s metaphysical “essentialism” and historicism as the philosophical origin of fascism. Our four exiles also radically transformed their respective fields of scholarly expertise. In philology, Auerbach invented the field of comparative literature with his book Mimesis. In history, Baron’s The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance led to the creation of the Atlantic Republican tradition of historiography. In the history of political thought, Strauss’s Natural Right and History and Popper’s The Open Society and Its Enemies transformed post-WWII political philosophy’s canon by controversially renarrating it as decline and deterioration rather than advancing enlightenment. Hans Baron (1900-1988) claimed in his celebrated work, The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance, 1955, that “The method of interpreting great turning-points in the history of thought against their social or political background has yet not rendered its full service in the study of the Italian Renaissance.” In our chapter, “Hans Baron: Humanism and Republican Liberty in an Age of Tyranny and Barbarism,” we claim that the method of interpreting great turning-points in the life and mind of this prominent historian of political thought against his social and political background renders important results regarding properly understanding Baron’s magnum opus and its unique mode of historical thought, namely the view that history progresses through a series of major crises. Our goal therefore is to trace the development of Baron’s historical thought and imagination. During his life, two world wars and two German revolutions took place – the revolution of 1918- 1919, which led to the creation of the Weimar Republic, and the Nazi revolution of 1933, which ushered in the establishment of the Third Reich. His was the “Age of Catastrophe” as Eric Hobsbawm termed the years from the First World
Recommended publications
  • An Annotated List of Italian Renaissance Humanists, Their Writings About Jews, and Involvement in Hebrew Studies, Ca
    An annotated list of Italian Renaissance humanists, their writings about Jews, and involvement in Hebrew studies, ca. 1440-ca.1540 This list, arranged in chronological order by author’s date of birth, where known, is a preliminary guide to Italian humanists’ Latin and vernacular prose and poetic accounts of Jews and Judaic culture and history from about 1440 to 1540. In each case, I have sought to provide the author’s name and birth and death dates, a brief biography highlighting details which especially pertain to his interest in Jews, a summary of discussions about Jews, a list of relevant works and dates of composition, locations of manuscripts, and a list of secondary sources or studies of the author and his context arranged alphabetically by author’s name. Manuscripts are listed in alphabetical order by city of current location; imprints, as far as possible, by ascending date. Abbreviations: DBI Dizionario biografico degli Italiani (Rome: Istituto della enciclopedia italiana, 1960-present) Kristeller, Iter Paul Oskar Kristeller, Iter Italicum: A Finding List of Uncatalogued or Incompletely Catalogued Humanistic Manuscripts of the Renaissance in Italian and Other Libraries; Accedunt alia itinera, 6 vols (London: Warburg Institute; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1963-1991) Simon Atumano (d. c. 1380) Born in Constantinople and became a Basilian monk in St John of Studion there. Bishop of Gerace in Calabria from 1348 until 1366, and Latin archbishop of Thebes until 1380. During his time in Thebes, which was the capital of the Catalan duchy of Athens, he studied Hebrew and in the mid- to late-1370s he began work on a polyglot Latin-Greek-Hebrew Bible dedicated to Pope Urban VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfonso De Cartagena and Leonardo Bruni1)
    The Lost Modernity: 1436-1439 (Alfonso de Cartagena and Leonardo Bruni1) __________________________________________________ RAFAEL HERRERA GUILLÉN UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA (UNED) Abstract This work shows the transcendence that had to Modernity the polemic that confronted the Italian Leonardo Bruni and the Castilian Alonso de Cartagena about the translation of Aristotle. That episode was premonitory of two tendencies that found their way into Modernity to the present: a unidirectional Modernity, colonial, and a plural Modernity, mestiza. In this manner, it is revealed the existence of a lost Modernity that was not built from the binary parameters of imperial and colonial power. Keywords Aristotle, Leonardo Bruni, Alonso de Cartagena, philology, converts, antisemitism, humanism. “…aquéllos dirigen el mundo con la multiplicidad de sus libros”2 Alonso de Cartagena 1. Unidirectional Modernity vs. Plural Modernity Between 1436 and 1439 a dispute took place in Europe that would turn out to be a destiny for Modernity. The character of that inaugural moment was philological, but there was something much more profound at stake than a translation issue. During those three decisive years, an Italian, Leonardo Bruni, and a Castilian, Alonso de Cartagena, argued about the correct way of translating the Ethics of Aristotle. Both contestants knew that such a philological problem hid a cosmos of cultural, social, and political decisions which, still to them, were unresolved. Modernity in nuce was beginning to unfold on both sides. In that polemic certain lines of action and thought began to function, which in the end would configure the entire Modernity. And it happened, precisely, because the effective history of this polemic shows how Modernity configured its conditions of possibility, reducing and neutralizing the liberating and pluralistic potential from one of the sides, although it never fully erased it from its core.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulgar Latin As an Emergent Concept in the Italian Renaissance (1435–1601): Its Ancient and Medieval Prehistory and Its Emergence and Development in Renaissance Linguistic Thought
    Journal of Latin Linguistics 2018; 17(2): 191–230 Josef Eskhult* Vulgar Latin as an emergent concept in the Italian Renaissance (1435–1601): its ancient and medieval prehistory and its emergence and development in Renaissance linguistic thought https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2018-0006 Abstract: This article explores the formation of Vulgar Latin as a metalinguistic concept in the Italian Renaissance (1435–1601) considering its continued, although criticized, use as a concept and term in modern Romance and Latin linguistics (1826 until the present). The choice of this topic is justified in view of the divergent previous modern historiography and because of the lack of a coherent historical investigation. The present study is based on a broad selec- tion of primary sources, in particular from classical antiquity and the Italian Renaissance. Firstly, this article traces and clarifies the prehistory of the concept of Vulgar Latin in ancient and medieval linguistic thought. Section 2 demonstrates that the concept of Vulgar Latin as a low social variety does not exist in pre-Renaissance linguistic thought. Secondly, this article describes and analyzes how, why and when the con- cept of Vulgar Latin emerged and developed in the linguistic thought of the Italian Renaissance. Section 3 surveys the historical intellectual contexts of the debates in which this concept was formed, namely questione della lingua in the Latin and Vernacular Italian Renaissances. Section 4 demonstrates how the ancient concept and term of sermo vulgaris as a diaphasic variety was revived, but also modified, in the Latin Renaissance of the fifteenth century, when the leading humanists developed new ideas on the history, nature and variability of ancient Latin.
    [Show full text]
  • Austria's Failed Denazification
    Student Publications Student Scholarship Spring 2020 The Silent Reich: Austria’s Failed Denazification Henry F. Goodson Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the European History Commons, and the Holocaust and Genocide Studies Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Recommended Citation Goodson, Henry F., "The Silent Reich: Austria’s Failed Denazification" (2020). Student Publications. 839. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/839 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The Cupola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Silent Reich: Austria’s Failed Denazification Abstract Between 1945 and 1956, the Second Austrian Republic failed to address the large number of former Austrian Nazis. Due to Cold War tensions, the United States, Britain, and France helped to downplay Austria’s cooperation with the Nazi Reich in order to secure the state against the Soviets. In an effort to stall the spread of socialism, former fascists were even recruited by Western intelligence services to help inform on the activities of socialists and communists within Austria. Furthermore, the Austrian people were a deeply conservative society, which often supported many of the far-right’s positions, as can be seen throughout contemporary Austrian newspaper articles and editorials. Antisemitism, belief in the superiority of Austro-Germanic culture, disdain for immigrants, and desire for national sovereignty were all widely present in Austrian society before, during, and after the Nazi period. These cultural beliefs, combined with neglect from the Western powers, integrated the far-right into the political decision-making process.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Publications
    Publications Department Catalogue of Publications 2018 | 5778 The mandate of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities includes the publication of writings calculated to promote scholarship and science. Titles are selected on the basis of academic merit by an interdisciplinary Publications Committee composed of Academy members. Many of the Academy’s publications in the humanities are critical editions of manuscripts and source texts in Jewish history, the history of Jewish thought and religion, medieval Jewish and Islamic thought, Jewish languages, and related areas. A wide range of academic fields, from classical studies to modern political thought, comes to expression in monographs and in collective volumes based on seminars and workshops hosted by the Academy. Lectures delivered at the Academy are published in the Proceedings of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. In the natural sciences, the Academy publishes the distinguished Flora Palaestina and Fauna Palaestina series on behalf of the Flora and Fauna Committee, as well as publications on the region’s geology, ecology, and biodiversity, and surveys of environmental issues. Many of the annual Einstein Memorial Lectures delivered at the Academy by eminent scientists in a variety of fields are published in the Einstein Memorial Lectures series. Visit our website: www.academy.ac.il Cover illustration: The section showing Eretz Israel and Transjordan in the Peutinger Map )Tabula Peutingeriana(, a medieval map of Roman roads drawn in the eleventh or twelfth century. The map is based on a geographical work dated 3656/ or ca. 435, itself based on earlier sources, possibly the Alexandrian scientist and geographer Ptolemy )ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Guessing – I
    Machine Guessing { I David Miller Department of Philosophy University of Warwick COVENTRY CV4 7AL UK e-mail: [email protected] ⃝c copyright D. W. Miller 2011{2018 Abstract According to Karl Popper, the evolution of science, logically, methodologically, and even psy- chologically, is an involved interplay of acute conjectures and blunt refutations. Like biological evolution, it is an endless round of blind variation and selective retention. But unlike biological evolution, it incorporates, at the stage of selection, the use of reason. Part I of this two-part paper begins by repudiating the common beliefs that Hume's problem of induction, which com- pellingly confutes the thesis that science is rational in the way that most people think that it is rational, can be solved by assuming that science is rational, or by assuming that Hume was irrational (that is, by ignoring his argument). The problem of induction can be solved only by a non-authoritarian theory of rationality. It is shown also that because hypotheses cannot be distilled directly from experience, all knowledge is eventually dependent on blind conjecture, and therefore itself conjectural. In particular, the use of rules of inference, or of good or bad rules for generating conjectures, is conjectural. Part II of the paper expounds a form of Popper's critical rationalism that locates the rationality of science entirely in the deductive processes by which conjectures are criticized and improved. But extreme forms of deductivism are rejected. The paper concludes with a sharp dismissal of the view that work in artificial intelligence, including the JSM method cultivated extensively by Victor Finn, does anything to upset critical rationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • 'History, Method and Pluralism: a Re-Interpretation of Isaiah Berlin's
    HISTORY, METHOD, AND PLURALISM A Re-interpretation of Isaiah Berlin’s Political Thought Thesis submitted to the University of London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by HAOYEH London School of Economics and Political Science 2005 UMI Number: U205195 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U205195 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 S 510 Abstract of the Thesis In the literature on Berlin to date, two broad approaches to study his political thought can be detected. The first is the piecemeal approach, which tends to single out an element of Berlin’s thought (for example, his distinction between negative liberty and positive liberty) for exposition or criticism, leaving other elements unaccounted. And the second is the holistic approach, which pays attention to the overall structure of Berlin’s thought as a whole, in particular the relation between his defence for negative liberty and pluralism. This thesis is to defend the holistic approach against the piecemeal approach, but its interpretation will differ from the two representative readings, offered by Claude J.
    [Show full text]
  • Liah Greenfeld
    curriculum vitae1Liah Greenfeld LIAH GREENFELD Curriculum Vitae January 2013 Current Address Boston University Tel.: 617-358-1772 The University Professors Fax: 617-353-5084 745 Commonwealth Avenue [email protected] Boston, MA 02215 Current Appointment University Professor, Professor of Sociology, Political Science, and Anthropology, Boston University; Distinguished Adjunct Professor, Lingnan University, Hong Kong. Personal Born August 22, 1954, in Vladivostok, USSR; educated through high-school in Sochi (Krasnodar region); emigrated to Israel in 1972; moved to the United States in 1982; married; one child. Appointments in Academic Institutions 2011-2016 Distinguished Adjunct Professor, Lingnan University, Hong Kong. February 2009 Visiting Professor, St. George University, Grenada. 12/ 2005-1/2006 Guest Member, Institute for Advanced Studies, Jerusalem, Israel. Summers 2004- Visiting Professor, Institute of Federalism, Law School, University of Fribourg, 2005 Switzerland – Summer University Spring 1998 Fellow, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. Spring 1997 Visiting Professor (Directeur d'Etudes), Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris curriculum vitae2Liah Greenfeld 1989-1992 John L. Loeb Associate Professor of Social Sciences, Harvard University Fall 1992 Visiting Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, MIT 1985-97 Fellow, Russian Research Center, Harvard University 1989-90 Member, Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science, Princeton 1985-94 Assistant, then Associate Professor
    [Show full text]
  • Machiavelli and the Ciompi Uprising
    306 Winter Chapter 16 Plebeian Politics: Machiavelli and the Ciompi Uprising Yves Winter Of the eight books that compose Niccolò Machiavelli’s Florentine Histories, the better part of Book III is dedicated to the uprising of the Florentine wool work- ers known as the ‘tumult of the Ciompi’ in 1378. And while this is not the only episode of social conflict chronicled in the Florentine Histories, the insurrec- tion occupies a special place. During the summer months of 1378, the lowest stratum of the Florentine working class overthrew the governing elites and in- stituted a revolutionary regime. For the first time in its history, a radical insur- gent government that included both artisans and manual labourers, drawn primarily from the textile industry, ruled Florence.1 Even though the uprising was defeated after six short weeks, its memory cast an enduring spell on Flo- rentine history.2 Alarmed by the unprecedented political and economic mo- bilisation of the plebs, the Florentine elites developed a lasting fear of the rabble manifest in successive generations of humanist writers. Most historians that preceded Machiavelli (and most that followed him, up until the nineteenth century) had little sympathy for the workers, describing the uprising as instigated by the devil, as a result of moral depravity, or as the work of a mob manipulated by intrigue and conspiracy.3 Leonardo Bruni considered the insurgents a bunch of violent and ‘impoverished criminals’ whose ‘only goal was plunder [and] slaughter’.4 And Poggio Bracciolini thought the revolt was divine punishment for the sins of the city and of its * This essay originally appeared in Political Theory, 2012, 40, 6: 736–66.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Document: the FURTHEST
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: THE FURTHEST WATCH OF THE REICH: NATIONAL SOCIALISM, ETHNIC GERMANS, AND THE OCCUPATION OF THE SERBIAN BANAT, 1941-1944 Mirna Zakic, Ph.D., 2011 Directed by: Professor Jeffrey Herf, Department of History This dissertation examines the Volksdeutsche (ethnic Germans) of the Serbian Banat (northeastern Serbia) during World War II, with a focus on their collaboration with the invading Germans from the Third Reich, and their participation in the occupation of their home region. It focuses on the occupation period (April 1941-October 1944) so as to illuminate three major themes: the mutual perceptions held by ethnic and Reich Germans and how these shaped policy; the motivation behind ethnic German collaboration; and the events which drew ethnic Germans ever deeper into complicity with the Third Reich. The Banat ethnic Germans profited from a fortuitous meeting of diplomatic, military, ideological and economic reasons, which prompted the Third Reich to occupy their home region in April 1941. They played a leading role in the administration and policing of the Serbian Banat until October 1944, when the Red Army invaded the Banat. The ethnic Germans collaborated with the Nazi regime in many ways: they accepted its worldview as their own, supplied it with food, administrative services and eventually soldiers. They acted as enforcers and executors of its policies, which benefited them as perceived racial and ideological kin to Reich Germans. These policies did so at the expense of the multiethnic Banat‟s other residents, especially Jews and Serbs. In this, the Third Reich replicated general policy guidelines already implemented inside Germany and elsewhere in German-occupied Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Eidos Fecha De Recepción: Diciembre 1 De 2010 ISSN 1692-8857 Fecha De Aceptación: Enero 21 De 2011 Issne 2011-7477
    eidos Fecha de recepción: diciembre 1 de 2010 ISSN 1692-8857 Fecha de aceptación: enero 21 de 2011 ISSNe 2011-7477 PRAGMATISM IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY AND RESEARCH SHANE J. RALSTON Penn State University, Department of Philosophy [email protected]. RESUMEN Este artículo examina la literatura reciente sobre la intersección entre pragmatismo filosófico y relaciones internacionales (RI), incluyendo la teoría y la metodología de investigación de las RI. Se sostiene que uno de los obstáculos que motivan las teorías y metodologías pragmatistas de las RI es la dificultad de definir el pragmatismo, en particular si existe la necesidad de una definición más genérica de pragmatismo, o una más específica que se vincule con las metas de teó ricos e investigadores de las rela cio nes internacionales. Aunque el prag matismo filosófico no se ajusta fá cilmente a ninguno de los marcos teóricos tradicionales en RI, aquí esbozo una teoría pragmatista de las RI que se inspira en los tra- bajos de John Dewey y Richard Rorty. Sobre la metodología de las RI, señalo de qué manera la combina ción del pragmatismo filosófico y los métodos de investigación en RI se han beneficiado enormemente de las contribuciones de algunos prag matistas líderes de las RI y que hay signos de esperanza en que dicha relación puede enriquecerse pos teriormente. PALAB R AS CLAVE Pragmatismo, relaciones internacionales, investigación, teoría, práctica, John Dewey, Richard Rorty. ABSTRACT The goal of this paper is exami ne the recent literature on the intersec- tion between philosophical pragmatism and International Relations (IR), including IR theory and IR re search methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Fascist Groups from Brazil and Argentina on the Internet (1996-2007) Revista Tempo E Argumento, Vol
    Revista Tempo e Argumento E-ISSN: 2175-1803 [email protected] Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina Brasil Santos Maynard, Dilton Cândido Intolerance South of America: comparative study of fascist groups from Brazil and Argentina on the Internet (1996-2007) Revista Tempo e Argumento, vol. 6, núm. 12, mayo-agosto, 2014, pp. 276-307 Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina Florianópolis, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=338132153015 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative e ‐ ISSN 2175 ‐ 1803 Intolerance South of America: comparative study of fascist groups from Brazil and Argentina on the Internet (1996‐2007) Abstract This article investigates the uses of the Internet made by Dilton Cândido Santos Maynard fascist groups from Brazil and Argentina. We use as main Universidade Federal de Sergipe ‐ UFS. sources professedly fascist websites created shortly after the Brasil popularization of the Internet. From the perspective offered [email protected] by the comparative methodology advocated by Marc Bloch, the text examines the relation between Brazilian homepages and the best known South American far‐right website, Ciudad Libertad Opinión, created in 1999 with the primary purpose of spreading fascist ideas and providing support to other extremist groups. We point out the strategic role played by the web portal Libre Opinión as articulator between fascist groups in South America, this is a key contributor in the diffusion of Brazilian web pages marked to convey on a regular basis xenophobic, racist, anti‐Semitic, and homophobic messages.
    [Show full text]