DOCSLIB.ORG

Lumber, Stone & Concrete

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lumber, Stone & Concrete United States Department of Lumber, Stone & Concrete Agriculture Forest Service Administrative Facilities of the Intermountain Region Caribou-Targhee National Forest, 1891-1955 Caribou-Targhee National Forest Historic Context Statement and Evaluations Forest Service Report No. TG-CB-06-760 March 2007 Cover: Green Basin Ranger Station. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). 2 Lumber, Stone & Concrete Administrative Facilities of the Caribou-Targhee National Forest, 1891-1955 Historic Context Statement and Evaluations Forest Service Report No. TG-CB-06-760 By Richa Wilson Anthony Godfrey, Ph.D. Regional Architectural Historian U.S. West Research, Inc. USDA Forest Service 2395 East Fisher Lane Intermountain Region Facilities Group Salt Lake City, UT 84109 324 25th Street 801-485-2526 Ogden, UT 84401 [email protected] 801-625-5704 [email protected] Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS......................................................................................................................... I PREFACE ..........................................................................................................................................VIII ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................................IX MAPS ...................................................................................................................................................XI CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................1 SPATIAL BOUNDARIES...................................................................................................................1 GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................1 Targhee National Forest...............................................................................................................1 Caribou National Forest................................................................................................................2 Caribou-Targhee National Forest.................................................................................................3 TEMPORAL BOUNDARIES..............................................................................................................3 CHAPTER 2: EVOLUTIONS OF THE FORESTS...............................................................................4 THE FIRST FOREST RESERVES....................................................................................................4 TARGHEE NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................4 Yellowstone Timberland Reserve, 1891-1906 and Forest Reserve, 1907-1908 .........................4 Henry’s Lake Forest Reserve, 1905-1908....................................................................................5 Targhee National Forest, 1908-2000............................................................................................5 Palisade National Forest, 1910-1917 ...........................................................................................6 CARIBOU NATIONAL FOREST .......................................................................................................7 Pocatello National Forest, 1903- 1915 .........................................................................................7 Port Neuf Forest Reserve, 1907-1908 .........................................................................................8 Bear River National Forest, 1906-1908........................................................................................8 Caribou National Forest, 1907-2000 ............................................................................................9 DISTRICT & FOREST CONSOLIDATIONS....................................................................................10 PERSONNEL..................................................................................................................................11 CHAPTER 3: CIVILIAN CONSERVATION CORPS .........................................................................13 CAMP HISTORIES .........................................................................................................................14 Camp A-1-1, Beaver Creek........................................................................................................................14 Camp F-25, Alpine....................................................................................................................................14 Camp F-84..............................................................................................................................................14 Camp F-94, Osborne Springs.....................................................................................................................14 Camp F-95..............................................................................................................................................15 Camp F-96, Indian Creek...........................................................................................................................15 Camp F-99, Paris .....................................................................................................................................15 Camp F-101, Bannock (Mink Creek) ...........................................................................................................15 Camp F-170, Stewart Flat..........................................................................................................................16 Camp F-405, Heise ..................................................................................................................................17 Camp F-406, Porcupine ............................................................................................................................17 Camp F-408, Cub River.............................................................................................................................17 Camp BR-28, Island Park ..........................................................................................................................18 A HISTORICAL STUDY, 1983 ........................................................................................................18 CHAPTER 4: NURSERIES AND FIRE..............................................................................................19 NURSERIES ...................................................................................................................................19 FIRE MANAGEMENT .....................................................................................................................19 LUMBER, STONE & CONCRETE I CHAPTER 5: SUPERVISOR’S OFFICES......................................................................................... 21 TARGHEE NATIONAL FOREST .................................................................................................... 21 Early Forest Supervisors ............................................................................................................ 21 St. Anthony’s Supervisor’s Office............................................................................................... 21 St. Anthony Warehouse Site ...................................................................................................... 22 CARIBOU NATIONAL FOREST ..................................................................................................... 23 Early Forest Supervisors ............................................................................................................ 23 Supervisor’s Offices.................................................................................................................... 24 Pocatello Administrative Site...................................................................................................... 25 CHAPTER 6: ASHTON RANGER DISTRICT................................................................................... 27 NAMES & CONFIGURATIONS ...................................................................................................... 27 DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS ........................................................................................................ 28 ADMINISTRATIVE SITES .............................................................................................................. 28 Ashton Warehouse Site.............................................................................................................. 28 Ashton Dwelling #1 (511 Highland Street) ................................................................................. 29 Ashton Dwelling (261 Walnut Street) ......................................................................................... 30 Bishop Mountain Lookout Site...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UMNP Mountains Manual 2017
    Mountain Adventures Manual utahmasternaturalist.org June 2017 UMN/Manual/2017-03pr Welcome to Utah Master Naturalist! Utah Master Naturalist was developed to help you initiate or continue your own personal journey to increase your understanding of, and appreciation for, Utah’s amazing natural world. We will explore and learn aBout the major ecosystems of Utah, the plant and animal communities that depend upon those systems, and our role in shaping our past, in determining our future, and as stewards of the land. Utah Master Naturalist is a certification program developed By Utah State University Extension with the partnership of more than 25 other organizations in Utah. The mission of Utah Master Naturalist is to develop well-informed volunteers and professionals who provide education, outreach, and service promoting stewardship of natural resources within their communities. Our goal, then, is to assist you in assisting others to develop a greater appreciation and respect for Utah’s Beautiful natural world. “When we see the land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.” - Aldo Leopold Participating in a Utah Master Naturalist course provides each of us opportunities to learn not only from the instructors and guest speaKers, But also from each other. We each arrive at a Utah Master Naturalist course with our own rich collection of knowledge and experiences, and we have a unique opportunity to share that Knowledge with each other. This helps us learn and grow not just as individuals, but together as a group with the understanding that there is always more to learn, and more to share.
    [Show full text]
  • Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804
    Photo by Louis Kamler. www.nationalforests.org Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804 Printed on recycled paper 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Island Lake, Eldorado National Forest Desolation Wilderness. Photo by Adam Braziel. 1 We are pleased to present the National Forest Foundation’s (NFF) Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2013. During this fourth year of the Treasured Landscapes campaign, we have reached $86 million in both public and private support towards our $100 million campaign goal. In this year’s report, you can read about the National Forests comprising the centerpieces of our work. While these landscapes merit special attention, they are really emblematic of the entire National Forest System consisting of 155 National Forests and 20 National Grasslands. he historical context for these diverse and beautiful Working to protect all of these treasured landscapes, landscapes is truly inspirational. The century-old to ensure that they are maintained to provide renewable vision to put forests in a public trust to secure their resources and high quality recreation experiences, is National Forest Foundation 2013 Annual Report values for the future was an effort so bold in the late at the core of the NFF’s mission. Adding value to the 1800’s and early 1900’s that today it seems almost mission of our principal partner, the Forest Service, is impossible to imagine. While vestiges of past resistance what motivates and challenges the NFF Board and staff. to the public lands concept live on in the present, Connecting people and places reflects our organizational the American public today overwhelmingly supports values and gives us a sense of pride in telling the NFF maintaining these lands and waters in public ownership story of success to those who generously support for the benefit of all.
    [Show full text]
  • IMBCR Report
    Integrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation Regions (IMBCR): 2015 Field Season Report June 2016 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 14500 Lark Bunting Lane Brighton, CO 80603 303-659-4348 www.birdconservancy.org Tech. Report # SC-IMBCR-06 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies Connecting people, birds and land Mission: Conserving birds and their habitats through science, education and land stewardship Vision: Native bird populations are sustained in healthy ecosystems Bird Conservancy of the Rockies conserves birds and their habitats through an integrated approach of science, education and land stewardship. Our work radiates from the Rockies to the Great Plains, Mexico and beyond. Our mission is advanced through sound science, achieved through empowering people, realized through stewardship and sustained through partnerships. Together, we are improving native bird populations, the land and the lives of people. Core Values: 1. Science provides the foundation for effective bird conservation. 2. Education is critical to the success of bird conservation. 3. Stewardship of birds and their habitats is a shared responsibility. Goals: 1. Guide conservation action where it is needed most by conducting scientifically rigorous monitoring and research on birds and their habitats within the context of their full annual cycle. 2. Inspire conservation action in people by developing relationships through community outreach and science-based, experiential education programs. 3. Contribute to bird population viability and help sustain working lands by partnering with landowners and managers to enhance wildlife habitat. 4. Promote conservation and inform land management decisions by disseminating scientific knowledge and developing tools and recommendations. Suggested Citation: White, C. M., M. F. McLaren, N. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishlake National Forest
    FISHLAKE NATIONAL FOREST RESPONSE TO COMMENTS for the FISHLAKE OHV ROUTE DESIGNATION PROJECT 12 October 2006 INTRODUCTION The forest incorporated existing comments from prior public participation processes during the pre- NEPA (NFMA) assessment. The following documents from these efforts are incorporated by reference: Public comments received for the 2001 OHV Event Environmental Assessment for the Rocky Mountain and Fillmore Jamborees. The assessment covered all of the Fishlake and portions of the Dixie and Manti-LaSal National Forests as well as Richfield BLM. OHV and travel management comments received by mail or at public meetings for Forest Plan revision efforts. Meeting notes and final presentations and reports from the Forest Plan revision Topical Working Groups (TWiGs) for OHVs, dispersed camping, and undeveloped area suitability. These records are included in the OHV project file and are incorporated by reference. The Notice of Intent (NOI) for the Fishlake OHV Route Designation Project was published in the Federal Register on June 7, 2004. The NOI included a proposed action (Alternative 2) that designated routes and areas open to motorized use on the Fishlake National Forest. The effect of these designations is to close the forest to unrestricted motorized cross-country travel. The NOI asked for comments on the proposed action by July 30, 2004. Immediately prior to release of the NOI, the Forest Service briefed local governmental officials, motorized advocacy groups, businesses, and environmental groups. The project web site http://www.fs.fed.us/r4/fishlake/projects/ohv.shtml, press release, and postings at some trailheads were used to disseminate information and gather comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • National Forest Imagery Catalog Collection at the USDA
    National Forest Imagery Catalog collection at the USDA - Farm Service Agency Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO) 2222 West 2300 South Salt Lake City, UT 84119-2020 (801) 844-2922 - Customer Service Section (801) 956-3653 - Fax (801) 956-3654 - TDD [email protected] http://www.apfo.usda.gov This catalog listing shows the various photographic coverages used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and archived at the Aerial Photography Field Office. This catalog references U.S. Forest Service (FS) and other agencies imagery. For imagery prior to 1955, please contact the National Archives & Records Administration: Cartographic & Architectural Reference (NWCS-Cartographic) Aerial Photographs Team http://www.archives.gov/research/order/maps.html#contact Coverage of U.S. Forest Service photography is listed alphabetically for each forest within a region. Numeric and alpha codes used to identify FS projects are determined by the Forest Service. The original film type for most of this imagery is a natural color negative. Line indexes are available for most projects. The number of index sheets required to cover a project area is shown on the listing. Please reference the remarks column, which may identify a larger or smaller project area than the National Forest area defined in the header. Offered in the catalog listing at each National Forest heading is a link to locate the Regional and National Forest office address and phone number at: http://www.fs.fed.us/intro/directory You may wish to visit the National Forest office to view the current imagery and have them assist you in identifying aerial imagery from the APFO.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE USDA FOREST SERVICE ● Intermountain Region 324 25th STREET OGDEN, UTAH 84401 ● Web: http://www.fs.fed.us/r4 Release No. R4-1201 Contact: Erin O’Connor 801-625-5347 Mitch Snow 202-912-7368 National Forests Added and Comment Period Formally Extended on Planning for Sage Grouse Conservation Measures In cooperation with the Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management will issue a corrected Notice of Intent to address sage-grouse in 10 additional National Forest System Lands and Resource Management Plans and formally extended the comment period through March 23, 2012. The notice will appear in the February 10, 2012 Federal Register. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) are seeking public comment on issues that should be addressed in Environmental Impact Statements (EIS’s) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements (SEIS’s) that will evaluate and provide greater sage-grouse conservation measures in land use plans in 10 Western states. This notice continues public comment on the scoping process for the EISs/SEISs through March 23, 2012. The EIS’s/SEIS’s will be coordinated under two regions: The Rocky Mountain Region, previously designated as the Eastern Region, which includes land use plans in the states of Colorado, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota and portions of Utah and Montana; and the Great Basin Region, previously designated as the Western Region, which includes land use plans in northeastern California, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, and portions of Utah and Montana. Within the Rocky Mountain Region, the potentially affected National Forest System Land Management Plans include: Colorado’s Routt National Forest Wyoming’s Thunder Basin National Grassland, Medicine Bow National Forest and the Bridger-Tetons National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Manti-La Sal Ranger Stations
    United States Department of Agriculture Commodious Cabins & Forest Service Intermountain Region Handsome Structures MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST MAY 2013 Administrative Facilities of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, 1905-1962 Historic Context Statement & Evaluations, Forest Service Report No. ML-13-1437 Cover: Ranger David Williams with his family at the Clay Springs Ranger Station, 1908 “A commodious cabin is being built, and other improvements which will be made will make the station a very convenient one.” – “Building New Ranger Station on Wilson Mesa,” Times Independent, November 18, 1920, 1 The new Moab building “is a handsome structure and affords ample space for the supervisor’s office. eventually the forest headquarters will be one of the most attractive locations in town.” – “Forest Service In New Building,” Times Independent, September 12, 1940, 1. Commodious Cabins and Handsome Structures Administrative Facilities of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, 1905-1962 Historic Context Statement and Evaluations Forest Service Report No. ML-13-1437 By Richa Wilson Regional Architectural Historian USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................. V CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 1 SPATIAL BOUNDARIES ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest
    Stokes Nature Center History & Lore of Logan Canyon Podcast Series A Growing National Forest The protected area that includes Logan Canyon has grown and changed names many times. In 1903, the Logan Forest Reserve was created by presidential proclamation and covered 107,540 acres. It and other forest reserves across the nation were under the jurisdiction of the Interior Department's General Land Office. Two years after the Logan Forest Reserve was established, Gifford Pinchot, Chief of the Bureau of Forestry at the Department of Agriculture, transferred all forest reserves to his agency and then renamed it the Forest Service. While in office, Pinchot brought millions of acres of land under forest reserve status. The reserve system across the country tripled from 56 million acres in 1905 to 172 million acres in 1910. This is roughly twice the size of the state of Utah. At this time, the Logan Forest Reserve was expanded and renamed the Bear River Forest Reserve. It now included most of the Bear River Mountains up to Soda Springs, Idaho. William Weld Clark, Forest Supervisor for a short time, reported in 1907 the public opinion of Rich County residents to the growth of the protected forest region. “The attitude of the users and neighbors of this Forest is on the whole very friendly and favorable. There are still plenty of kickers who are to be found in all communities and are constitutionally opposed to any regulation by which they are required to ask for something that they have been in the habit of obtaining without consulting anyone.” Pinchot didn’t like the term “forest reserve.” He thought it gave the impression that the forests were set aside and not meant to be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon River Management Plan, Idaho
    Bitterroot, Boise, Nez Perce, Payette, and Salmon-Challis National Forests Record of Decision Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Frank Church – River of No Return Wilderness Revised Wilderness Management Plan and Amendments for Land and Resource Management Plans Bitterroot, Boise, Nez Perce, Payette, and Salmon-Challis NFs Located In: Custer, Idaho, Lemhi, and Valley Counties, Idaho Responsible Agency: USDA - Forest Service Responsible David T. Bull, Forest Supervisor, Bitterroot NF Officials: Bruce E. Bernhardt, Forest Supervisor, Nez Perce NF Mark J. Madrid, Forest Supervisor, Payette NF Lesley W. Thompson, Acting Forest Supervisor, Salmon- Challis NF The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital and family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Person with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ROD--II Table of Contents PREFACE ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness in the Northern Rockies| a Missoula-Lolo National Forest Perspective
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1993 Wilderness in the northern Rockies| A Missoula-Lolo National Forest perspective Todd L. Denison The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Denison, Todd L., "Wilderness in the northern Rockies| A Missoula-Lolo National Forest perspective" (1993). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4091. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4091 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY Copying allowed as provided under provisions of the Fair Use Section of the U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW, 1976. Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's written consent. MontanaUniversity of WILDERNESS IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES: A MISSOULA-LOLO NATIONAL FOREST PERSPECTIVE By Todd L. Denison B.A. University of Montana, 1986 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 1993 Approved by Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School UMI Number: EP36297 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • A Forest Mystery Solved
    A FOREST MYSTERY SOLVED boys, there's a dead deer," exclaimedcovered, and apparently very fresh, probably "LOOK,Floyd Cossitt, a graduate of the Idahomade the night before or in early morning. School of Forestry in 1924 and now technicalSome of the boys recalled then having seen assistant to the Kaniksu National Forest inthese tracks on the way in but paid little at- northern Idaho, as he was escorting the Juniorstention to them.That evening at the bunk- over an old abandoned logging road. house every effort was made to assemble the The "boys"fif teen forestry students of theinformation and develop the solution.That junior class from the Idaho School of Forestryforest tragedy was enacted in many ways but on their annual two weeks' field trip to theno one was entirely satisfied with the solution. Northern Rocky Mountain Forest Experiment Cossirr GIVES EX?LANATION Station at Priest River in northern Idaho The next day, Mr. Cossitt again escorted the stopped short and there before them lay agroup, this time on a timber marking project, dead doe.Deep gashes here and there overand promised an explanation of the death of the body were evident as if a slashing, sharpthe dead deer as soon as convenient during knife had been used to mutilate the animalthe day's routine.He stated, at the proper unto death.Blood was trickling from thetime, this explanation was obtained from an wounds and from the nostrils.Wide openold-time trapper of his acquaintance and is as eyes of the dead animal seemed to show anfollows: expression of intense pain and no little amount A mother cougar was teaching her offspring of sympathy for the deer was evident on thea cougar kittento kill deer and between face of every mother's son present.The dead the two the dead doe was the result.This ac- animal was viewed in silent bewilderment forcounts for the way the ground was trampled several minutes, each man turning over theand dug up.
    [Show full text]