DOCSLIB.ORG

Ethicalmun IV

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ethicalmun IV EthicalMUN IV The War of The Roses Chairs: Izzy Ramos and Morium Begum Crisis Directors: Kevin He and Caroline Madsen EthicalMUN IV Dear Delegates, It is my pleasure to welcome you to the fourth Ethical Model United Nations Conference (EthicalMUN IV) as members of the War of the Roses committee! My name is Morium Begum, and I will serve as the co-chair of the committee alongside Julie Johnson my hardworking and dedicated friend, Isabella (Izzy) Ramos. As your chairs, Izzy Co-Secretary General and I have been working hard with our crisis directors, Kevin He and Caroline Mad, to make this conference the best yet. We are all excited for a fun-filled conference Olivia Pollack with lots of great debate, jokes, and laughs! Co-Secretary General Currently, I am a junior, but I started Model UN in 7th grade and have loved it ever since. Model UN has helped me develop many crucial life skills, such as Aleksi Sefanov speaking in front of a large group of people and arguing in favor of things I do not Chief of Staff necessarily believe in. Last year, I was a part of the crisis team for a committee and enjoyed coming up with various problems to make your lives harder. This is my first Ben Greer time being a chair for a committee and I’m really excited. Aside from Model UN, I Chief of Staff enjoy partaking in various racial affinity spaces, such as the Asian affinity group, the Women of Color Coalition, and more. When I’m not at school or working, I’m most Brian Phillips likely reading Webtoons, listening and dancing to trashy music or just hanging out with my friends. (I will probably play one of my trashy songs at least once during Under Secretary- this conference so be ready to bop along. Or else.) General of Committees Izzy, Kevin, Caroline, and I are all really excited about EthicalMUN IV and we are sure this committee will be a blast! This crisis committee will encourage you, Sara Snyder the delegates, to get in touch with your creative sides as you tackle the barriers of Under Secretary- convention in order to find solutions to the dynastic struggle in 15th century General of Committees England. In order to prepare for your position on one of the War of the Roses councils, I urge you all to not only read the background guide in its entirety but also Gavin Kelly to delve further into research on the topics. Overall, I want this to be a fun, Chief Crisis Director rewarding experience, and if you all come prepared and speak up in committee, I’m sure it will be an exciting day. Until then, delegates, read up: the fate of England’s Thomas Vernarde future rests on your shoulders. Chief Crisis Director See you in May! Amani Creamer Director of Outreach Best, Morium Begum [email protected] The War of the Roses EthicalMUN IV Crisis Committee Procedure minute moderated caucus passes, the Like most crisis committees, perpetual moderated caucus will be the parliamentary procedure will be suspended, and the committee will slightly different from General enter the five-minute moderated Assemblies and Specialized caucus. If there are no points or Committees. The parliamentary motions on the floor, the chair will procedure used in this committee is revert to the perpetual moderated optimized for the relatively few caucus. people in our committee and the quick Relevant Points and Motions: responses needed for crises. • Point of Inquiry • Point of Information Perpetual Moderated Caucus: • Point of Personal Privilege Unlike GA or Specialized • Point of Order Committees, Crisis Committees will • Motion to Open Debate not have a speakers list, and will • Motion for a Moderated operate under a perpetual moderated Caucus caucus. A perpetual moderated caucus • Motion for an Unmoderated is a never-ending moderated caucus Caucus that runs for the entirety of the • Motion for a Round Table committee with no set topic. For this • Motion to Introduce All Papers committee, the perpetual moderated on the Dais caucus will have a 30 second • Motion to Introduce an speaking time. This perpetual Amendment moderated caucus will be suspended • Motion to divide the Question when a delegate proposes a motion. • Motion to Enter Voting For example, if a motion for a five- Procedure 1 The War of the Roses Crisis EthicalMUN IV • Motion to Adjourn Debate inform or misinform the public according to the desires of the Written Papers committee. They will have the same Crisis Notes: Crisis notes are notes sponsor and signatory rules as used to take personal action from a directives. delegate, without the need for committee approval. A character's Like all committees, collaborating portfolio powers, therefore, binds with other delegates is strongly crisis notes. Please ensure to sign your recommended. However, in a crisis character’s name at the end of your committee, it is also encouraged that crisis note and address it to CRISIS one stays in character and acts in on the front of your folded note. accordance with their character’s motivations. Directives: Like general assemblies and specialized committees, crisis Procedure Specific to this committees have documents that take Committee committee action concerning the Flow of debate will be issues at hand. In crisis committees, conducted in a manner as similar as this document is called a directive. possible to the functioning of the The number of sponsors and historical Royal Councils of Lancaster signatories required on directives will and York. This entails moderated depend on the size of the committee. caucuses and speaker’s lists, and may be punctuated by periods of open Press Releases: Press releases are debate, depending on the situation at committee documents addressed to hand. In the role of the leaders of the the public. They can be used to two houses, we will be chairing the 2 The War of the Roses EthicalMUN IV Crisis committee in true Royal Council delegates may interject their own style. For the purposes of fruitful opinions into debate and, when debate, however, we will keep our appropriate, change their mind on input as a member to a minimum. As topics of discussion to suit the mentioned before, voting requires that purposes of the situation at hand. a simple majority is present in the Note, however, that while creativity is room, and all legislation will be promoted, inconsistency is not. Be passed on a simple majority as well. sure that you can defend and justify PLEASE NOTE the simple majority your views, and argue accordingly for required to vote on a York Resolution the achieving of your goals, at all is only referring to the delegates on times. The War of the Roses is a crisis the side of the house of York. committee, so come prepared to deal Members of the councils will with anything that is thrown your pass documents primarily in the form way. In addition to the provided of directives, communiqués, and press material, debate will be directed based releases. Additionally, while delegates on the arrival of crises. Crises may will be expected to stay in character come in the form of press releases by and represent the general viewpoints key figures, prisoners being brought and interests of their assigned Council in for questioning, or any number of member and their respective house, surprise events. After the crisis has they will not be limited to only these been presented, debate will resume on views. For instance, a delegate may the new developments. vote in favor of something that their Council member was against in the past if delegates find they are swayed by the course of debate to a different conclusion or viewpoint. Also, 3 The War of the Roses EthicalMUN IV Crisis Historical Background claims to the throne of England The Plantagenet Dynasty of formed the basis of the War of the England began with the accession of Roses. England’s gradual defeat in the King Henry II to the throne in 1154 Hundred Years’ War destabilized the CE with sovereignty over both realm and undermined the authority of England and Normandy in northern the English monarchy. Over a century France. Henry II’s marriage to of war, England lost all of its French Eleanor of Aquitaine added large territories with the exception of portions of southern France to the Calais. English nobles who had lost English crown. When King Charles their French 6 holdings bore a IV of France died in 1328 without a staggering economic cost and felt male heir, Plantagenet King Edward robbed of influence in a sociopolitical III laid claim to the French throne, system based entirely on feudal igniting the famous Hundred Years’ holdings. Furthermore, the weak and War between England and France. easily influenced Henry VI proved to John of Gaunt, the 1st Duke of be a disappointment compared to his Lancaster and Edward III’s third son, predecessor Henry V, who was a war- became the founding member of the time hero and renowned for his House of Lancaster, from which chivalry. Henry VI’s overt favoritism future Kings Henry IV, Henry V, and of Edmund Beaufort, the 2nd Duke of Henry VI would come. On the other Somerset, in spite of overwhelming hand, Edmund of Langley, the 1st opposition to Somerset alienated Duke of York and Edward III’s fourth Henry VI from his nobles. In 1453, son, founded the House of York. Henry VI became mentally incapacitated, and Richard, the 3rd While both Houses belonged to the Duke of York, was appointed as Lord Plantagenet dynasty, competing Protector. The Duke of York was a 4 The War of the Roses EthicalMUN IV Crisis strong and popular leader with a class and the growing influence of legitimate claim to the throne that was towns and cities in England, the only contested by Henry VI’s son, dominant segment of society lies with Edward of Westminster.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • War of Roses: a House Divided
    Stanford Model United Nations Conference 2014 War of Roses: A House Divided Chairs: Teo Lamiot, Gabrielle Rhoades Assistant Chair: Alyssa Liew Crisis Director: Sofia Filippa Table of Contents Letters from the Chairs………………………………………………………………… 2 Letter from the Crisis Director………………………………………………………… 4 Introduction to the Committee…………………………………………………………. 5 History and Context……………………………………………………………………. 5 Characters……………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Topics on General Conference Agenda…………………………………..……………. 9 Family Tree ………………………………………………………………..……………. 12 Special Committee Rules……………………………………………………………….. 13 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………. 14 Letters from the Chairs Dear Delegates, My name is Gabrielle Rhoades, and it is my distinct pleasure to welcome you to the Stanford Model United Nations Conference (SMUNC) 2014 as members of the The Wars of the Roses: A House Divided Joint Crisis Committee! As your Wars of the Roses chairs, Teo Lamiot and I have been working hard with our crisis director, Sofia Filippa, and SMUNC Secretariat members to make this conference the best yet. If you have attended SMUNC before, I promise that this year will be even more full of surprise and intrigue than your last conference; if you are a newcomer, let me warn you of how intensely fun and challenging this conference will assuredly be. Regardless of how you arrive, you will all leave better delegates and hopefully with a reinvigorated love for Model UN. My own love for Model United Nations began when I co-chaired a committee for SMUNC (The Arab Spring), which was one of my very first experiences as a member of the Society for International Affairs at Stanford (the umbrella organization for the MUN team), and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Later that year, I joined the intercollegiate Model United Nations team.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 2: Power: Monarchy and Democracy in Britain C1000-2014
    Paper 2: Power: Monarchy and democracy in Britain c1000-2014. 1. Describe the Anglo-Saxon system of government. [4] • Witan –The relatives of the King, the important nobles (Earls) and churchmen (Bishops) made up the Kings council which was known as the WITAN. These men led the armies and ruled the shires on behalf of the king. In return, they received wealth, status and land. • At local level the lesser nobles (THEGNS) carried out the roles of bailiffs and estate management. Each shire was divided into HUNDREDS. These districts had their own law courts and army. • The Church handled many administrative roles for the King because many churchmen could read and write. The Church taught the ordinary people about why they should support the king and influence his reputation. They also wrote down the history of the period. 2. Explain why the Church was important in Anglo-Saxon England. [8] • The church was flourishing in Aethelred’s time (c.1000). Kings and noblemen gave the church gifts of land and money. The great MINSTERS were in Rochester, York, London, Canterbury and Winchester. These Churches were built with donations by the King. • Nobles provided money for churches to be built on their land as a great show of status and power. This reminded the local population of who was in charge. It hosted community events as well as religious services, and new laws or taxes would be announced there. Building a church was the first step in building a community in the area. • As churchmen were literate some of the great works of learning, art and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • What Kind of Ruler Was Oliver Cromwell? > Key People & Events
    Civil War > What kind of ruler was Oliver Cromwell? > Key people & events What kind of ruler was Oliver Cromwell? Key people & events Key dates December 1653 Cromwell became Lord Protector. He ruled with the Council of State, advisers chosen by him. September 1654 Cromwell’s first Parliament met. MPs were forced to swear loyalty to him or resign. At the same time Cromwell made great efforts to achieve what he called ‘healing and settlement’. This meant fair and efficient government for all. November 1654 Cromwell introduced excise (a tax on all goods bought and sold). This was not approved by Parliament. January 1655 Cromwell dismissed his first Parliament and ruled without Parliament. August 1655 Cromwell put Britain under military rule. He appointed eleven Major Generals to rule the country. This approach was unsuccessful and unpopular. September 1656 The Second Protectorate Parliament met, but only after 100 MPs opposed to Cromwell were banned. January 1657 Cromwell agreed to end the system of Major Generals. March 1657 MPs came up with a new system for government in the ‘Humble Petition and Advice’. Many MPs, and Cromwell’s supporters, urged him to make himself king. Cromwell refused the crown, but was confirmed as Lord Protector. February 1658 Cromwell dismissed Parliament after more disputes with MPs. September 1658 Cromwell died. His son Richard became Lord Protector, but was forced to retire in May 1659. 1660 No acceptable person could be found to take over as Lord Protector. Parliament invited Charles II (son of Charles I) back to restore the monarchy. This is known as ‘The Restoration’.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did Britain Become a Republic? > New Government
    Civil War > Why did Britain become a republic? > New government Why did Britain become a republic? Case study 2: New government Even today many people are not aware that Britain was ever a republic. After Charles I was put to death in 1649, a monarch no longer led the country. Instead people dreamed up ideas and made plans for a different form of government. Find out more from these documents about what happened next. Report on the An account of the Poem on the arrest of setting up of the new situation in Levellers, 1649 Commonwealth England, 1649 Portrait & symbols of Cromwell at the The setting up of Cromwell & the Battle of the Instrument Commonwealth Worcester, 1651 of Government http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/ Page 1 Civil War > Why did Britain become a republic? > New government Case study 2: New government - Source 1 A report on the arrest of some Levellers, 29 March 1649 (Catalogue ref: SP 25/62, pp.134-5) What is this source? This is a report from a committee of MPs to Parliament. It explains their actions against the leaders of the Levellers. One of the men they arrested was John Lilburne, a key figure in the Leveller movement. What’s the background to this source? Before the war of the 1640s it was difficult and dangerous to come up with new ideas and try to publish them. However, during the Civil War censorship was not strongly enforced. Many political groups emerged with new ideas at this time. One of the most radical (extreme) groups was the Levellers.
    [Show full text]
  • Cromwelliana 2012
    CROMWELLIANA 2012 Series III No 1 Editor: Dr Maxine Forshaw CONTENTS Editor’s Note 2 Cromwell Day 2011: Oliver Cromwell – A Scottish Perspective 3 By Dr Laura A M Stewart Farmer Oliver? The Cultivation of Cromwell’s Image During 18 the Protectorate By Dr Patrick Little Oliver Cromwell and the Underground Opposition to Bishop 32 Wren of Ely By Dr Andrew Barclay From Civilian to Soldier: Recalling Cromwell in Cambridge, 44 1642 By Dr Sue L Sadler ‘Dear Robin’: The Correspondence of Oliver Cromwell and 61 Robert Hammond By Dr Miranda Malins Mrs S C Lomas: Cromwellian Editor 79 By Dr David L Smith Cromwellian Britain XXIV : Frome, Somerset 95 By Jane A Mills Book Reviews 104 By Dr Patrick Little and Prof Ivan Roots Bibliography of Books 110 By Dr Patrick Little Bibliography of Journals 111 By Prof Peter Gaunt ISBN 0-905729-24-2 EDITOR’S NOTE 2011 was the 360th anniversary of the Battle of Worcester and was marked by Laura Stewart’s address to the Association on Cromwell Day with her paper on ‘Oliver Cromwell: a Scottish Perspective’. ‘Risen from Obscurity – Cromwell’s Early Life’ was the subject of the study day in Huntingdon in October 2011 and three papers connected with the day are included here. Reflecting this subject, the cover illustration is the picture ‘Cromwell on his Farm’ by Ford Madox Brown (1821–1893), painted in 1874, and reproduced here courtesy of National Museums Liverpool. The painting can be found in the Lady Lever Art Gallery in Port Sunlight Village, Wirral, Cheshire. In this edition of Cromwelliana, it should be noted that the bibliography of journal articles covers the period spring 2009 to spring 2012, addressing gaps in the past couple of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering King Charles I: History, Art and Polemics from the Restoration to the Reform Act T
    REMEMBERING KING CHARLES I: HISTORY, ART AND POLEMICS FROM THE RESTORATION TO THE REFORM ACT T. J. Allen Abstract: The term Restoration can be used simply to refer to the restored monarchy under Charles II, following the Commonwealth period. But it can also be applied to a broader programme of restoring the crown’s traditional prerogatives and rehabilitating the reign of the king’s father, Charles I. Examples of this can be seen in the placement of an equestrian statue of Charles I at Charing Cross and a related poem by Edmund Waller. But these works form elements in a process that continued for 200 years in which the memory of Charles I fused with contemporary constitutional debates. The equestrian statue of Charles I at Charing Cross, produced by the French sculptor Hubert Le Sueur c1633 and erected in 1675. Photograph: T. J. Allen At the southern end of Trafalgar Square, looking towards Whitehall, stands an equestrian statue of Charles I. This is set on a pedestal whose design has been attributed to Sir Christopher Wren and was carved by Joshua Marshall, Master Mason to Charles II. The bronze figure was originally commissioned by Richard Weston (First Earl of Portland, the king’s Lord High Treasurer) and was produced by the French sculptor Hubert Le Sueur in the early 1630s. It originally stood in 46 VIDES 2014 the grounds of Weston’s house in Surrey, but as a consequence of the Civil War was later confiscated and then hidden. The statue’s existence again came to official attention following the Restoration, when it was acquired by the crown, and in 1675 placed in its current location.
    [Show full text]
  • History Term 4
    History: Why were Kings back in Fashion by 1660? Year 7 Term 4 Timeline Key Terms Key Questions 1625 Charles I becomes King of England. Civil War A war between people of the same country. What Caused the English Civil War? The Divine Right of Kings — Charles I felt that God had given him Charles closes Parliament. The Eleven Years of This is a belief that the King or Queen is the most 1629 Divine Right of the power to rule and so Parliament should follow his leadership. Tyranny begin. powerful person on earth as God put them into Kings Parliament disagreed with the King over the Divine Right of Kings. power. Parliament believed it should have an important role in running the Charles reopens Parliament in order to raise 1640 country. money for war. Parliament tried to limit the King’s power. Charles responded by Eleven Years Charles I ruled England without Parliament for declaring war on Parliament in 1642. Tyranny eleven years. Charles I attempts to arrest 5 members of 1642 parliament. The English Civil War begins. Why did Parliament Win the War? A government where a King or Queen is the Head of Monarchy 1644 Parliamentarians win the Battle of Marston Moor. State. The New Model Army was created by Parliamentarians in 1645. These soldiers were paid for their services and trained well. 1645 Parliamentarians win the Battle of Naseby. A group in the UK elected by the people. They have Parliament had more money. They controlled the south of England Parliament which was much richer in resources.
    [Show full text]
  • MA Dissertatio
    Durham E-Theses Northumberland at War BROAD, WILLIAM,ERNEST How to cite: BROAD, WILLIAM,ERNEST (2016) Northumberland at War, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11494/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk ABSTRACT W.E.L. Broad: ‘Northumberland at War’. At the Battle of Towton in 1461 the Lancastrian forces of Henry VI were defeated by the Yorkist forces of Edward IV. However Henry VI, with his wife, son and a few knights, fled north and found sanctuary in Scotland, where, in exchange for the town of Berwick, the Scots granted them finance, housing and troops. Henry was therefore able to maintain a presence in Northumberland and his supporters were able to claim that he was in fact as well as in theory sovereign resident in Northumberland.
    [Show full text]
  • Schuler Dissertation Final Document
    COUNSEL, POLITICAL RHETORIC, AND THE CHRONICLE HISTORY PLAY: REPRESENTING COUNCILIAR RULE, 1588-1603 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Anne-Marie E. Schuler, B.M., M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor Richard Dutton, Advisor Professor Luke Wilson Professor Alan B. Farmer Professor Jennifer Higginbotham Copyright by Anne-Marie E. Schuler 2011 ABSTRACT This dissertation advances an account of how the genre of the chronicle history play enacts conciliar rule, by reflecting Renaissance models of counsel that predominated in Tudor political theory. As the texts of Renaissance political theorists and pamphleteers demonstrate, writers did not believe that kings and queens ruled by themselves, but that counsel was required to ensure that the monarch ruled virtuously and kept ties to the actual conditions of the people. Yet, within these writings, counsel was not a singular concept, and the work of historians such as John Guy, Patrick Collinson, and Ann McLaren shows that “counsel” referred to numerous paradigms and traditions. These theories of counsel were influenced by a variety of intellectual movements including humanist-classical formulations of monarchy, constitutionalism, and constructions of a “mixed monarchy” or a corporate body politic. Because the rhetoric of counsel was embedded in the language that men and women used to discuss politics, I argue that the plays perform a kind of cultural work, usually reserved for literature, that reflects, heightens, and critiques political life and the issues surrounding conceptions of conciliar rule.
    [Show full text]
  • The Livery Collar: Politics and Identity in Fifteenth-Century England
    The Livery Collar: Politics and Identity in Fifteenth-Century England MATTHEW WARD, SA (Hons), MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy AUGUST 2013 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, lS23 7BQ www.bl.uk ANY MAPS, PAGES, TABLES, FIGURES, GRAPHS OR PHOTOGRAPHS, MISSING FROM THIS DIGITAL COPY, HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED AT THE REQUEST OF THE UNIVERSITY Abstract This study examines the social, cultural and political significance and utility of the livery collar during the fifteenth century, in particular 1450 to 1500, the period associated with the Wars of the Roses in England. References to the item abound in government records, in contemporary chronicles and gentry correspondence, in illuminated manuscripts and, not least, on church monuments. From the fifteenth century the collar was regarded as a potent symbol of royal power and dignity, the artefact associating the recipient with the king. The thesis argues that the collar was a significant aspect of late-medieval visual and material culture, and played a significant function in the construction and articulation of political and other group identities during the period. The thesis seeks to draw out the nuances involved in this process. It explores the not infrequently juxtaposed motives which lay behind the king distributing livery collars, and the motives behind recipients choosing to depict them on their church monuments, and proposes that its interpretation as a symbol of political or dynastic conviction should be re-appraised. After addressing the principal functions and meanings bestowed on the collar, the thesis moves on to examine the item in its various political contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • 160 the Fall of Suffolk and Normandy B Y 1445, William De La Pole, Duke
    160 The Fall of Suffolk and Normandy B y 1445, William de la Pole, Duke of Suffolk was clearly Henry's most trusted adviser. He faced a difficult task - to steer a bankrupt nation into the harbor of peace. Avoiding the ship of France trying to sink her on the way in. Would they make it? Formigny In this episode we are lucky enough to have another Weekly Word from Kevin Stroud, author of the History of English Podcast. If you like it, why not go the whole hog, and visit his website, The History of English Podcast. Also you might want to look at the rather touching letter from William de la Pole, Duke of Suffolk to his eight year old son, John. - It's on the website. 161 Captain of Kent 1450 was an eventful year. The fall of Suffolk, and now Kent was once again in flames, just as it had been in 1381. This time the leader that emerged was one Jack Cade. Dramatis Personae This week, a few new names... William Aiscough, Bishop of Salisbury: only a cameo appearance for this episode. Jack Cade: Leader of the rebellion - again only a cameo appearance, leader of the rebellion of 1450. James Fiennes, Lord of Saye and Sele: Treasurer of England, and a nasty piece of work. He came to a sticky end! The Arms of Humphrey Stafford, 1st Duke of Buckingham, 1402-1460 The Stafford family that are the holders of the title of the Duke of Buckingham, are of the blood royal; they are descended from Edward III’s youngest son, Thomas of Woodstock.
    [Show full text]
  • Rupin 2 of Armenia, King
    Rupin 2 of Armenia, King 1-Rupin 2 of Armenia, King d. 1169 +Isabel de Toron 2-Philippe of Armenia +Theodore I Lascarius, Emperor of Nicaea b. 1173, Nicaea, d. Abt Aug 1222 3-Mary Lascarius b. Abt 1206, d. 1270 +Bela IV of Hungary, King of Hungary b. Nov 1206, d. 3 May 1270 4-Katharine of Hungary d. 1242 4-Kunigunda of Hungary d. 1292 +Unknown 4-Anna of Hungary b. Abt 1227, d. 1274 +Rostislaw Mikhailovich b. Abt 1220, of Kiev, d. 1263 5-Kunegunda Rostislavna b. Abt 1246, d. 9 Sep 1285 +Premysl 2 of Bohemia, King b. Abt 1233, d. 26 Aug 1278 6-Vaclav 2 of Bohemia, King b. 17 Sep 1271, d. 21 Jun 1305 +Jutte of Austria b. 13 Mar 1271, d. 18 Jun 1297 7-Elizabeth of Bohemia b. 20 Jan 1292, d. 1330 +John of Bohemia, King d. 1346 8-Charles 4 of Bohemia, King & Emperor d. 1378 +Blanca of Valois +Agnes of Palatin +Anne of Silesia 9-Wenceslaus of Bohemia, Emp. and King +Unknown 10-Elizabeth of Bohemia d. 1447 +Albert 2 of Austria, K & Emperor d. 1439 11-George of Hungary & Bohemia d. 1436 11-Anne of Hungary & Bohemia d. 1462 +William 3 of Thuringia 11-Elizabeth of Hungary and Bohemia d. 1503 +Casimir 4 of Poland, King 11-Ladislaus of Hungary & Bohemia, King b. Abt 1440, (posthumously), d. 1445 +Elizabeth of Pomerania 9-Sigismund of Bohemia, Emperor d. 1437 +Mary of Hungary d. 1392 +Jan of Bohemia, King b. 10 Aug 1296, d. 26 Aug 1346 8-Jutte of Bohemia b.
    [Show full text]