<<

CAMPBELL

TENTH EDITION Reece • Urry • Cain • Wasserman • Minorsky • Jackson 26 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life

Lecture Presentation by Nicole Tunbridge and Kathleen Fitzpatrick

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Investigating the Tree of Life

. Legless lizards have evolved independently in several different groups

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Phylogeny is the evolutionary history of a species or group of related species . For example, a phylogeny shows that legless lizards and snakes evolved from different lineages of legged lizards . The discipline of systematics classifies and determines their evolutionary relationships

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.2

Geckos

ANCESTRAL No limbs LIZARD Snakes (with limbs)

Iguanas

Monitor lizard

Eastern glass lizard No limbs

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Concept 26.1: Phylogenies show evolutionary relationships . Taxonomy is the scientific discipline concerned with classifying and naming organisms

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Binomial Nomenclature

. In the 18th century, Carolus Linnaeus published a system of taxonomy based on resemblances . Two key features of his system remain useful today: two-part names for species and hierarchical classification

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . The two-part scientific name of a species is called a binomial . The first part of the name is the genus . The second part, called the specific epithet, is unique for each species within the genus . The first letter of the genus is capitalized, and the entire species name is italicized . Both parts together name the species (not the specific epithet alone)

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Hierarchical Classification

. Linnaeus introduced a system for grouping species in increasingly inclusive categories . The taxonomic groups from broad to narrow are domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species . A taxonomic unit at any level of hierarchy is called a taxon . The broader taxa are not comparable between lineages

. For example, an order of snails has less genetic diversity than an order of © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.3 Cell division error Species: Panthera pardus Genus: Panthera Family: Felidae Order: Carnivora

Class: Mammalia

Phylum: Chordata

Domain: Kingdom: Bacteria Animalia Domain: Archaea Domain: Eukarya © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Animation: Classification Schemes

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Linking Classification and Phylogeny

. The evolutionary history of a group of organisms can be represented in a branching phylogenetic tree

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.4

Order Family Genus Species

Panthera Felidae

Panthera

pardus

(leopard)

Taxidea Carnivora

Mustelidae Taxidea taxus (American

badger) Lutra

Lutra lutra

(European 1 otter)

Canis Canidae

Canis latrans

2 (coyote)

Canis lupus (gray wolf) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Linnaean classification and phylogeny can differ from each other . Systematists have proposed a classification system that would recognize only groups that include a common ancestor and all its descendants

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . A phylogenetic tree represents a hypothesis about evolutionary relationships . Each branch point represents the divergence of two species . Tree branches can be rotated around a branch point without changing the evolutionary relationships . Sister taxa are groups that share an immediate common ancestor

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . A rooted tree includes a branch to represent the last common ancestor of all taxa in the tree . A basal taxon diverges early in the history of a group and originates near the common ancestor of the group . A polytomy is a branch from which more than two groups emerge

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.5

Branch point: where lineages diverge Taxon A

3 Taxon B Sister 4 taxa Taxon C 2 Taxon D

5 Taxon E ANCESTRAL 1 LINEAGE Taxon F Basal Taxon G taxon This branch point This branch point forms represents the a polytomy: an common ancestor of unresolved pattern of taxa A–G. divergence.

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. What We Can and Cannot Learn from Phylogenetic Trees . Phylogenetic trees show patterns of descent, not phenotypic similarity . Phylogenetic trees do not indicate when species evolved or how much change occurred in a lineage . It should not be assumed that a taxon evolved from the taxon next to it

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Applying Phylogenies

. Phylogeny provides important information about similar characteristics in closely related species . A phylogeny was used to identify the species of whale from which “whale meat” originated

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.6

Results Minke (Southern Hemisphere) Unknowns #1a, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Minke (North Atlantic) Unknown #9 Humpback

Unknown #1b Blue

Unknowns #10, 11, 12, 13 Fin

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Concept 26.2: Phylogenies are inferred from morphological and molecular data . To infer phylogenies, systematists gather information about morphologies, genes, and biochemistry of living organisms

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Morphological and Molecular Homologies

. Phenotypic and genetic similarities due to shared ancestry are called homologies . Organisms with similar morphologies or DNA sequences are likely to be more closely related than organisms with different structures or sequences

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Sorting Homology from Analogy

. When constructing a phylogeny, systematists need to distinguish whether a similarity is the result of homology or analogy . Homology is similarity due to shared ancestry . Analogy is similarity due to

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Convergent evolution occurs when similar environmental pressures and natural selection produce similar (analogous) adaptations in organisms from different evolutionary lineages

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.7

Australian marsupial “mole”

North American eutherian mole

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Bat and wings are homologous as forelimbs, but analogous as functional wings . Analogous structures or molecular sequences that evolved independently are also called homoplasies . Homology can be distinguished from analogy by comparing fossil evidence and the degree of complexity . The more elements that are similar in two complex structures, the more likely it is that they are homologous

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluating Molecular Homologies

. Systematists use computer programs and mathematical tools when analyzing comparable DNA segments from different organisms

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.8-3 1 C C A T C ACell G A G T C C division 2 C C A T C Aerror G A G T C C

Deletion 1 C C A T C A G A G T C C 2 C C A T C A G A G T C C G T A Insertion

1 C C A T C A A G T C C 2 C C A T G T A C A G A G T C C

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.8-4 1 C C A T C ACell G A G T C C division 2 C C A T C Aerror G A G T C C

Deletion 1 C C A T C A G A G T C C 2 C C A T C A G A G T C C G T A Insertion

1 C C A T C A A G T C C 2 C C A T G T A C A G A G T C C

1 C C A T C A A G T C C 2 C C A T G T A C A G A G T C C

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . It is also important to distinguish homology from analogy in molecular similarities . Mathematical tools help to identify molecular homoplasies, or coincidences

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.9

A C G G A T A G T C C A C T A G G C A C T A

T C A C C G A C A G G T C T T T G A C T A G

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Concept 26.3: Shared characters are used to construct phylogenetic trees . Once homologous characters have been identified, they can be used to infer a phylogeny

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

. Cladistics groups organisms by common descent . A clade is a group of species that includes an ancestral species and all its descendants . Clades can be nested in larger clades, but not all groupings of organisms qualify as clades

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . A valid clade is monophyletic, signifying that it consists of the ancestor species and all its descendants

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.10

(a) Monophyletic group (clade) (b) Paraphyletic group (c) Polyphyletic group

A A A

1 B Group I B B Group III C C C 3 D D D

E E Group II E 2 F F F

G G G

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.10a

(a) Monophyletic group (clade)

A

1 B Group I

C D

E

F

G

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.10b

(b) Paraphyletic group

A

B

C D

E Group II 2 F

G

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.10c

(c) Polyphyletic group

A

B Group III C 3 D

E

F

G

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . A paraphyletic grouping consists of an ancestral species and some, but not all, of the descendants . A polyphyletic grouping includes distantly related species but does not include their most recent common ancestor

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Polyphyletic groups are distinguished from paraphyletic groups by the fact that they do not include the most recent common ancestor . Biologists avoid defining polyphyletic groups and instead reclassify organisms if evidence suggests they are polyphyletic

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.11 Paraphyletic group Common ancestor of even-toed Other even-toed ungulates ungulates

Hippopotamuses

Cetaceans

Seals

Bears

Other carnivores Polyphyletic group © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Shared Ancestral and Shared Derived Characters . In comparison with its ancestor, an has both shared and different characteristics . A shared ancestral character is a character that originated in an ancestor of the taxon . A shared derived character is an evolutionary novelty unique to a particular clade . A character can be both ancestral and derived, depending on the context

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Inferring Phylogenies Using Derived Characters

. When inferring evolutionary relationships, it is useful to know in which clade a shared derived character first appeared

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.12

TAXA Lancelet

)

(outgroup)

Lamprey

outgroup

Bass Lancelet ( Lamprey Frog Turtle Leopard Vertebral column 0 1 1 1 1 1 Bass

(backbone) Vertebral

Hinged jaws 0 0 1 1 1 1 column Frog Hinged jaws Four walking 0 0 0 1 1 1 legs Turtle Four walking legs

Amnion 0 0 0 0 1 1 CHARACTERS Amnion 0 0 0 0 0 1 Leopard Hair

(a) Character table (b) Phylogenetic tree

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.12a

TAXA

)

outgroup

Lamprey

Bass

Frog

Lancelet Leopard ( Turtle Vertebral column 0 1 1 1 1 1

(backbone)

Hinged jaws 0 0 1 1 1 1

Four walking 0 0 0 1 1 1 legs

Amnion 0 0 0 0 1 1 CHARACTERS

Hair 0 0 0 0 0 1

(a) Character table

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.12b Lancelet (outgroup)

Lamprey

Bass Vertebral column Frog Hinged jaws

Turtle Four walking legs

Amnion Leopard Hair

(b) Phylogenetic tree

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . An outgroup is a species or group of species that is closely related to the ingroup, the various species being studied . The outgroup is a group that has diverged before the ingroup . Systematists compare each ingroup species with the outgroup to differentiate between shared derived and shared ancestral characteristics

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Characters shared by the outgroup and ingroup are ancestral characters that predate the divergence of both groups from a common ancestor

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Phylogenetic Trees with Proportional Branch Lengths . In some trees, the length of a branch can reflect the number of genetic changes that have taken place in a particular DNA sequence in that lineage

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.13

Drosophila

Lancelet

Zebrafish

Frog

Chicken

Human

Mouse

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . In other trees, branch length can represent chronological time, and branching points can be determined from the fossil record

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.14

Drosophila

Lancelet

Zebrafish

Frog

Chicken

Human

Mouse CENO- PALEOZOIC MESOZOIC ZOIC 542 251 65.5 Present Millions of years ago

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Maximum Parsimony and Maximum Likelihood

. Systematists can never be sure of finding the best tree in a large data set . They narrow possibilities by applying the principles of maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Maximum parsimony assumes that the tree that requires the fewest evolutionary events (appearances of shared derived characters) is the most likely . The principle of maximum likelihood states that, given certain rules about how DNA changes over time, a tree can be found that reflects the most likely sequence of evolutionary events . Computer programs are used to search for trees that are parsimonious and likely

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.15

Technique 3 1/C 1/C I I III II III II 1/C III II I 1/C 1/C Species I Species II Species III

Three phylogenetic hypotheses: 3/A 2/T 3/A 1 4 I I III I I III 2/T 3/A 4/C II III II II III II 4/C 4/C 2/T III II I III II I 3/A 4/C 2/T 4/C 2/T 3/A

Site 2 1 2 3 4 Results I I III Species I C T A T II III II Species II C T T C Species III A G A C III II I 6 events 7 events 7 events Ancestral A G T T sequence

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.15a

Technique

Species I Species II Species III

1 Three phylogenetic hypotheses: I I III

II III II

III II I

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.15b

Technique Site 2 1 2 3 4 Species I C T A T Species II C T T C Species III A G A C Ancestral A G T T sequence

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.15c

Technique 3 1/C 1/C I I III

II III II 1/C III II I 1/C 1/C

4 3/A 2/T 3/A 2/T I 3/A I 4/C III

II III II 4/C 4/C 2/T III II I 3/A 4/C 2/T 4/C 2/T 3/A

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.15d

Results I I III

II III II

III II I 6 events 7 events 7 events

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Phylogenetic Trees as Hypotheses

. The best hypotheses for phylogenetic trees fit the most data: morphological, molecular, and fossil . Phylogenetic bracketing allows us to predict features of an ancestor from features of its descendants . For example, phylogenetic bracketing allows us to infer characteristics of

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.16

Lizards and snakes

Crocodilians

Ornithischian Common dinosaurs ancestor of crocodilians, dinosaurs, Saurischian and dinosaurs Birds

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Birds and share several features: four- chambered hearts, song, nest building, and brooding . These characteristics likely evolved in a common ancestor and were shared by all of its descendants, including dinosaurs . The fossil record supports nest building and brooding in dinosaurs

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.17

Front limb Hind limb

Eggs

(a) Fossil remains of Oviraptor (b) Artist’s reconstruction of the and eggs ’s posture based on the fossil findings

© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.