CAMPBELL
TENTH BIOLOGY EDITION Reece • Urry • Cain • Wasserman • Minorsky • Jackson 26 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Lecture Presentation by Nicole Tunbridge and Kathleen Fitzpatrick
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Investigating the Tree of Life
. Legless lizards have evolved independently in several different groups
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Phylogeny is the evolutionary history of a species or group of related species . For example, a phylogeny shows that legless lizards and snakes evolved from different lineages of legged lizards . The discipline of systematics classifies organisms and determines their evolutionary relationships
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.2
Geckos
ANCESTRAL No limbs LIZARD Snakes (with limbs)
Iguanas
Monitor lizard
Eastern glass lizard No limbs
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Concept 26.1: Phylogenies show evolutionary relationships . Taxonomy is the scientific discipline concerned with classifying and naming organisms
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Binomial Nomenclature
. In the 18th century, Carolus Linnaeus published a system of taxonomy based on resemblances . Two key features of his system remain useful today: two-part names for species and hierarchical classification
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . The two-part scientific name of a species is called a binomial . The first part of the name is the genus . The second part, called the specific epithet, is unique for each species within the genus . The first letter of the genus is capitalized, and the entire species name is italicized . Both parts together name the species (not the specific epithet alone)
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Hierarchical Classification
. Linnaeus introduced a system for grouping species in increasingly inclusive categories . The taxonomic groups from broad to narrow are domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species . A taxonomic unit at any level of hierarchy is called a taxon . The broader taxa are not comparable between lineages
. For example, an order of snails has less genetic diversity than an order of mammals © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.3 Cell division error Species: Panthera pardus Genus: Panthera Family: Felidae Order: Carnivora
Class: Mammalia
Phylum: Chordata
Domain: Kingdom: Bacteria Animalia Domain: Archaea Domain: Eukarya © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Animation: Classification Schemes
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Linking Classification and Phylogeny
. The evolutionary history of a group of organisms can be represented in a branching phylogenetic tree
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.4
Order Family Genus Species
Panthera Felidae
Panthera
pardus
(leopard)
Taxidea Carnivora
Mustelidae Taxidea taxus (American
badger) Lutra
Lutra lutra
(European 1 otter)
Canis Canidae
Canis latrans
2 (coyote)
Canis lupus (gray wolf) © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Linnaean classification and phylogeny can differ from each other . Systematists have proposed a classification system that would recognize only groups that include a common ancestor and all its descendants
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . A phylogenetic tree represents a hypothesis about evolutionary relationships . Each branch point represents the divergence of two species . Tree branches can be rotated around a branch point without changing the evolutionary relationships . Sister taxa are groups that share an immediate common ancestor
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . A rooted tree includes a branch to represent the last common ancestor of all taxa in the tree . A basal taxon diverges early in the history of a group and originates near the common ancestor of the group . A polytomy is a branch from which more than two groups emerge
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.5
Branch point: where lineages diverge Taxon A
3 Taxon B Sister 4 taxa Taxon C 2 Taxon D
5 Taxon E ANCESTRAL 1 LINEAGE Taxon F Basal Taxon G taxon This branch point This branch point forms represents the a polytomy: an common ancestor of unresolved pattern of taxa A–G. divergence.
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. What We Can and Cannot Learn from Phylogenetic Trees . Phylogenetic trees show patterns of descent, not phenotypic similarity . Phylogenetic trees do not indicate when species evolved or how much change occurred in a lineage . It should not be assumed that a taxon evolved from the taxon next to it
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Applying Phylogenies
. Phylogeny provides important information about similar characteristics in closely related species . A phylogeny was used to identify the species of whale from which “whale meat” originated
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.6
Results Minke (Southern Hemisphere) Unknowns #1a, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Minke (North Atlantic) Unknown #9 Humpback
Unknown #1b Blue
Unknowns #10, 11, 12, 13 Fin
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Concept 26.2: Phylogenies are inferred from morphological and molecular data . To infer phylogenies, systematists gather information about morphologies, genes, and biochemistry of living organisms
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Morphological and Molecular Homologies
. Phenotypic and genetic similarities due to shared ancestry are called homologies . Organisms with similar morphologies or DNA sequences are likely to be more closely related than organisms with different structures or sequences
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Sorting Homology from Analogy
. When constructing a phylogeny, systematists need to distinguish whether a similarity is the result of homology or analogy . Homology is similarity due to shared ancestry . Analogy is similarity due to convergent evolution
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Convergent evolution occurs when similar environmental pressures and natural selection produce similar (analogous) adaptations in organisms from different evolutionary lineages
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.7
Australian marsupial “mole”
North American eutherian mole
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Bat and bird wings are homologous as forelimbs, but analogous as functional wings . Analogous structures or molecular sequences that evolved independently are also called homoplasies . Homology can be distinguished from analogy by comparing fossil evidence and the degree of complexity . The more elements that are similar in two complex structures, the more likely it is that they are homologous
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Evaluating Molecular Homologies
. Systematists use computer programs and mathematical tools when analyzing comparable DNA segments from different organisms
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.8-3 1 C C A T C ACell G A G T C C division 2 C C A T C Aerror G A G T C C
Deletion 1 C C A T C A G A G T C C 2 C C A T C A G A G T C C G T A Insertion
1 C C A T C A A G T C C 2 C C A T G T A C A G A G T C C
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.8-4 1 C C A T C ACell G A G T C C division 2 C C A T C Aerror G A G T C C
Deletion 1 C C A T C A G A G T C C 2 C C A T C A G A G T C C G T A Insertion
1 C C A T C A A G T C C 2 C C A T G T A C A G A G T C C
1 C C A T C A A G T C C 2 C C A T G T A C A G A G T C C
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . It is also important to distinguish homology from analogy in molecular similarities . Mathematical tools help to identify molecular homoplasies, or coincidences
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.9
A C G G A T A G T C C A C T A G G C A C T A
T C A C C G A C A G G T C T T T G A C T A G
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Concept 26.3: Shared characters are used to construct phylogenetic trees . Once homologous characters have been identified, they can be used to infer a phylogeny
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Cladistics
. Cladistics groups organisms by common descent . A clade is a group of species that includes an ancestral species and all its descendants . Clades can be nested in larger clades, but not all groupings of organisms qualify as clades
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . A valid clade is monophyletic, signifying that it consists of the ancestor species and all its descendants
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.10
(a) Monophyletic group (clade) (b) Paraphyletic group (c) Polyphyletic group
A A A
1 B Group I B B Group III C C C 3 D D D
E E Group II E 2 F F F
G G G
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.10a
(a) Monophyletic group (clade)
A
1 B Group I
C D
E
F
G
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.10b
(b) Paraphyletic group
A
B
C D
E Group II 2 F
G
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.10c
(c) Polyphyletic group
A
B Group III C 3 D
E
F
G
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . A paraphyletic grouping consists of an ancestral species and some, but not all, of the descendants . A polyphyletic grouping includes distantly related species but does not include their most recent common ancestor
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Polyphyletic groups are distinguished from paraphyletic groups by the fact that they do not include the most recent common ancestor . Biologists avoid defining polyphyletic groups and instead reclassify organisms if evidence suggests they are polyphyletic
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.11 Paraphyletic group Common ancestor of even-toed Other even-toed ungulates ungulates
Hippopotamuses
Cetaceans
Seals
Bears
Other carnivores Polyphyletic group © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Shared Ancestral and Shared Derived Characters . In comparison with its ancestor, an organism has both shared and different characteristics . A shared ancestral character is a character that originated in an ancestor of the taxon . A shared derived character is an evolutionary novelty unique to a particular clade . A character can be both ancestral and derived, depending on the context
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Inferring Phylogenies Using Derived Characters
. When inferring evolutionary relationships, it is useful to know in which clade a shared derived character first appeared
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.12
TAXA Lancelet
)
(outgroup)
Lamprey
outgroup
Bass Lancelet ( Lamprey Frog Turtle Leopard Vertebral column 0 1 1 1 1 1 Bass
(backbone) Vertebral
Hinged jaws 0 0 1 1 1 1 column Frog Hinged jaws Four walking 0 0 0 1 1 1 legs Turtle Four walking legs
Amnion 0 0 0 0 1 1 CHARACTERS Amnion Hair 0 0 0 0 0 1 Leopard Hair
(a) Character table (b) Phylogenetic tree
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.12a
TAXA
)
outgroup
Lamprey
Bass
Frog
Lancelet Leopard ( Turtle Vertebral column 0 1 1 1 1 1
(backbone)
Hinged jaws 0 0 1 1 1 1
Four walking 0 0 0 1 1 1 legs
Amnion 0 0 0 0 1 1 CHARACTERS
Hair 0 0 0 0 0 1
(a) Character table
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.12b Lancelet (outgroup)
Lamprey
Bass Vertebral column Frog Hinged jaws
Turtle Four walking legs
Amnion Leopard Hair
(b) Phylogenetic tree
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . An outgroup is a species or group of species that is closely related to the ingroup, the various species being studied . The outgroup is a group that has diverged before the ingroup . Systematists compare each ingroup species with the outgroup to differentiate between shared derived and shared ancestral characteristics
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Characters shared by the outgroup and ingroup are ancestral characters that predate the divergence of both groups from a common ancestor
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Phylogenetic Trees with Proportional Branch Lengths . In some trees, the length of a branch can reflect the number of genetic changes that have taken place in a particular DNA sequence in that lineage
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.13
Drosophila
Lancelet
Zebrafish
Frog
Chicken
Human
Mouse
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . In other trees, branch length can represent chronological time, and branching points can be determined from the fossil record
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.14
Drosophila
Lancelet
Zebrafish
Frog
Chicken
Human
Mouse CENO- PALEOZOIC MESOZOIC ZOIC 542 251 65.5 Present Millions of years ago
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Maximum Parsimony and Maximum Likelihood
. Systematists can never be sure of finding the best tree in a large data set . They narrow possibilities by applying the principles of maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Maximum parsimony assumes that the tree that requires the fewest evolutionary events (appearances of shared derived characters) is the most likely . The principle of maximum likelihood states that, given certain rules about how DNA changes over time, a tree can be found that reflects the most likely sequence of evolutionary events . Computer programs are used to search for trees that are parsimonious and likely
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.15
Technique 3 1/C 1/C I I III II III II 1/C III II I 1/C 1/C Species I Species II Species III
Three phylogenetic hypotheses: 3/A 2/T 3/A 1 4 I I III I I III 2/T 3/A 4/C II III II II III II 4/C 4/C 2/T III II I III II I 3/A 4/C 2/T 4/C 2/T 3/A
Site 2 1 2 3 4 Results I I III Species I C T A T II III II Species II C T T C Species III A G A C III II I 6 events 7 events 7 events Ancestral A G T T sequence
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.15a
Technique
Species I Species II Species III
1 Three phylogenetic hypotheses: I I III
II III II
III II I
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.15b
Technique Site 2 1 2 3 4 Species I C T A T Species II C T T C Species III A G A C Ancestral A G T T sequence
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.15c
Technique 3 1/C 1/C I I III
II III II 1/C III II I 1/C 1/C
4 3/A 2/T 3/A 2/T I 3/A I 4/C III
II III II 4/C 4/C 2/T III II I 3/A 4/C 2/T 4/C 2/T 3/A
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.15d
Results I I III
II III II
III II I 6 events 7 events 7 events
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Phylogenetic Trees as Hypotheses
. The best hypotheses for phylogenetic trees fit the most data: morphological, molecular, and fossil . Phylogenetic bracketing allows us to predict features of an ancestor from features of its descendants . For example, phylogenetic bracketing allows us to infer characteristics of dinosaurs
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.16
Lizards and snakes
Crocodilians
Ornithischian Common dinosaurs ancestor of crocodilians, dinosaurs, Saurischian and birds dinosaurs Birds
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. . Birds and crocodiles share several features: four- chambered hearts, song, nest building, and brooding . These characteristics likely evolved in a common ancestor and were shared by all of its descendants, including dinosaurs . The fossil record supports nest building and brooding in dinosaurs
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Figure 26.17
Front limb Hind limb
Eggs
(a) Fossil remains of Oviraptor (b) Artist’s reconstruction of the and eggs dinosaur’s posture based on the fossil findings
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.