Extractive States: the Case of the Italian Unification.∗

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Extractive States: the Case of the Italian Unification.∗ Extractive States: The Case of the Italian Unification.∗ Guilherme de Oliveira and Carmine Guerriero Columbia Law School and University of Bologna March 31, 2017 Abstract Despite the huge evidence on the adverse impact of extractive policies, we still lack a framework that identifies their determinants. Here, we lay out a two-region, two-social class model for thinking about this issue, and we exploit its implications to identify the causes of the opening of the present-day divide between North and South of Italy. Differently from the extant literature, we document that it arose because of the region- specific policies selected between 1861 and 1911 by the elite of the Kingdom of Sardinia, which annexed the rest of Italy in 1861. While indeed pre-unitary land property tax revenues and railway diffusion were shaped by each region's farming productivity but not by its political relevance for the Piedmontese elite, the opposite was true for the post-unitary ones. Moreover, post-unitary tax distortions and the severity of the re- maining extractive policies|captured by the region's taxation capacity and political relevance|determined the North-South gaps in culture, literacy, and development but not that in the manufacturing industry value added. Consequently, extraction neither eased the formation of an unitary market nor favored industrialization. Our results remain robust to considering fixed region and time effects and the structural conditions differentiating the two blocks in 1861, i.e., pre-unitary inclusiveness of political insti- tutions, land ownership fragmentation, and inputs. Crucially, our framework clarifies the incentives of dominating groups in other unions, e.g., post-Civil War USA and EU. Keywords: Extractive States; Political Union; Culture; State Capacity. JEL classification: H20; H70; N4; Z10. ∗We are indebted to Brian A'Hearn, Toke Aidt, Marco Casari, Decio Coviello, Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci, Andy Hanssen, Eliana La Ferrara, Raffaella Paduano, Enrico Perotti, Torsten Persson, Laura Rondi, Avra- ham Tabbach, Guido Tabellini, Davide Ticchi, Paola Valbonesi, and seminar participants at Bologna, IMT, Maastricht University, UvA, and at the 2014 Winter Meeting of the Econometric Society for the insightful comments, to Carlo Ciccarelli, Mark Dincecco, Giovanni Federico, Stefano Fenoltea, Luigi Guiso, Giovanni Iuzzolino, Paolo Malanima, Luca Pennacchio, Guido Pescosolido, Paolo Pinotti, Giovanni Vecchi, and An- drea Vindigni for the data provided, and to the staffs of the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale and the Biblioteca SVIMEZ, both in Roma, for the guidance. Guilherme de Oliveira wishes to thank the \Funda¸c~aopara a Ci^enciae Tecnologia" for support through the Grant SFRH/BD/76122/2011, whereas Carmine Guerriero wishes to thank EIEF for hosting him while the first version of this paper was written. Corresponding author: Carmine Guerriero. Address: Strada Maggiore 45, 40125 Bologna, Italy. E-mail: [email protected] \The vast majority of the population [:::] feels entirely cut off from our institutions. People see them- selves subjected to the State and forced to serve it with their blood and their money, but they do not feel that they are [an] organic part of it." (Sydney Sonnino, Speech to the Chamber of Deputies, 30 March 1881). 1 Introduction Despite the huge evidence documenting that extractive institutions and policies can limit the access to rents discouraging in turn innovation (North et al., 2009) and can undermine both property rights protection and contract enforcement (Acemoglu and Robinson, 2012), we still lack a framework that identifies their determinants. Here, we lay out a two-region, two-social class model for thinking about this issue, and we exploit its implications to propose a novel account of the present-day economic divide between North and South of Italy.1 A well-known literature has traced back this gap to the diverse political trajectories followed by the two clusters during the Middle Ages (Putnam et al., 1993). In particular, the experience of more inclusive political institutions|i.e., the communes|would have helped Northern Italy develop a stronger culture of cooperation easing economic interactions (Guiso et al., 2016; Tabellini, 2010). Recent contributions however have raised several doubts on this slant. First, Boranbay and Guerriero (2016) show for Europe that instead the main driver of present-day culture has been the medieval need of sharing climate-driven consumption risk and that, up to the 17th century, the two clusters displayed similar cultural endowments. Second, a growing body of research reveals that the two groups were similarly underdeveloped in 1861 (Federico, 2007; Ciccarelli and Fenoaltea, 2013). Inspired by this evidence, we document that the opening of the present-day divide is the result of the region-specific policies selected between 1861 and 1911 by the elite of the Kingdom of Sardinia, which annexed the rest of Italy in 1861. They penalized more the regions farther away from the fiercer enemy of the House of Savoy and so less politically relevant for the Piedmontese elite. In the model, we consider two regions, which are first independent and then unified by a completely unforeseen shock similar to the one that originated the unitary state. The Northern region represents the Kingdom of Sardinia, whereas the Southern one stands for 1To elaborate, in 2008 Southern Italy displayed a nine percent lower share of respondents to the European Value Study reporting \tolerance and respect for other people" as important qualities children should be encouraged to learn and a 40 percent lower income per capita than Northern Italy (Iuzzolino et al., 2011). 2 any of the other states annexed by the Kingdom of Italy in 1861. Each region is inhabited by a mass zero elite and a mass one citizenry, who consumes the untaxed supply of a private good and a region-specific public good whose production is financed through the tax revenues not appropriated by the elite. The private good technology is multiplicative in the region-specific productivity and the citizenry's investment in an input that can be seen as either a culture of cooperation or human capital. The first interpretation links directly our setup to the extant literature on the medieval determinants of the present-day divide. Under autarky, each elite selects her region's tax rate by maximizing the sum of the citizenry's welfare and the rents net of linear tax-collection costs. Thus, equilibrium tax revenues fall with the marginal tax- collection costs and, because these are sizable, with the taxable value and thus the regional productivity. Under political union instead, both region-specific tax rates are selected by the Northern elite, who is less concerned with the Southern citizenry's welfare and appropriates from the South relatively more than the Southern elite can under autarky. In particular, the extractive power of the Northern elite is sufficiently strong to make taxation of the South profitable at the margin. These assumptions are consistent with the fact that the unitary state exercised a tight control on the annexed regions and was dominated by the elite of the Kingdom of Sardinia, who was chiefly interested in the Northern export-oriented farming and industry. The mix between stronger extractive capacity and her limited concerns with the South leads the Northern elite to raise from this region tax revenues rising with the South's productivity and falling with both the marginal tax-collection costs and the South's political relevance, i.e., the weight the Northern elite attaches to the Southern citizenry's welfare. In addition, extraction from the South is larger than under autarky, provided that the South's technology is not too backward, and pushes the Southern citizenry to prefer private to public good production. Hence, the Southern citizenry's investment and welfare rise with the factors limiting taxation, like the marginal tax-collection costs and the political relevance, and unification damages the South when it is not sufficiently salient for the North. To test these predictions, we analyze the thirteen present-day Italian regions annexed by the Kingdom of Italy between 1861 and 1911 but not part of the Kingdom of Sardinia. Being the Italian economy mainly agrarian over our 1801-1911 sample, we proxy the extent of extraction first and foremost with the land property taxation. Given the available in- 3 formation however, we do not study land property tax rates but the relative revenues per capita. Land property tax rates have been region-specific over the whole sample and, absent developed financial markets, dramatically shaped the landowners' capacity to invest in new farming technologies and the industry. Turning to the regional productivity, we rely upon the geographic drivers of the profitability of the main export-oriented farming sectors, i.e., arboriculture and sericulture. Next, we use as inverse metrics of the marginal tax-collection costs a measure of state capacity, i.e., the share of previous decade in which the state to which the region belonged partook in external wars. Finally, we propose as an inverse proxy for political relevance the distance between each region's main city and the capital of the fiercer enemy of the House of Savoy. Being our model applicable to any extent of extraction, these two proxies also capture the impact on the South of the other distortionary policies selected by the post-unitary government and illustrated in our historical analysis. Consistent with our model, while the pre-unitary revenues from land property taxes in 1861 lire per capita were shaped by each region's farming productivity but not by its political relevance for the Piedmontese elite, the opposite was true for the post-unitary ones. More- over, post-unitary tax distortions|proxied with the difference between the observed revenues and the counterfactual ones forecasted through pre-unitary estimates|and the severity of the remaining extractive policies|captured by the region's taxation capacity and political relevance|determined the North-South gaps in culture, literacy, and development.
Recommended publications
  • The Seafood Market in Italy GLOBEFISH RESEARCH PROGRAMME
    The Seafood Market in Italy GLOBEFISH RESEARCH PROGRAMME The Seafood Market in Italy Volum Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fish Products and Industry Division Viale delle Terme di Caracalla e 00153 Rome, Italy Tel.:+39 06 5705 5074 92 Fax: +39 06 5705 5188 www.globefish.org Volume 92 The Seafood Market in Italy by Camillo Catarci (April 2008) The GLOBEFISH Research Programme is an activity initiated by FAO's Fish Utilisation and Marketing Service, Rome, Italy and financed jointly by: - NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service), Washington, DC, USA - FROM, Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid, Spain - Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Copenhagen, Denmark - European Commission, Directorate General for Fisheries, Brussels, EU - Norwegian Seafood Export Council, Tromsoe, Norway - OFIMER (Office National Interprofessionnel des Produits de la Mer et de l’Aquaculture), Paris, France - ASMI (Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute), USA - DFO (Department of Fisheries and Oceans), Canada - SSA (Seafood Services Australia), Australia - Ministry of Fisheries, New Zealand Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, GLOBEFISH, Fish Products and Industry Division Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153Rome, Italy – Tel.: (39) 06570 56313 E-mail: [email protected] - Fax: (39) 0657055188 – http//:www.globefish.org i The designation employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Camillo Catarci; THE SEAFOOD MARKET IN ITALY GLOBEFISH Research Programme, Vol.92 Rome, FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Italian Emigration of Modern Times
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Spring 5-2010 The Italian Emigration of Modern Times: Relations Between Italy and the United States Concerning Emigration Policy, Diplomacy, and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment, 1870-1927 Patrizia Fama Stahle University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Cultural History Commons, European History Commons, Political History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Stahle, Patrizia Fama, "The Italian Emigration of Modern Times: Relations Between Italy and the United States Concerning Emigration Policy, Diplomacy, and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment, 1870-1927" (2010). Dissertations. 934. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/934 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi THE ITALIAN EMIGRATION OF MODERN TIMES: RELATIONS BETWEENITALY AND THE UNITED STATES CONCERNING EMIGRATION POLICY,DIPLOMACY, AND ANTI-IMMIGRANT SENTIMENT, 1870-1927 by Patrizia Famá Stahle Abstract of a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2010 ABSTRACT THE ITALIAN EMIGRATION OF MODERN TIMES: RELATIONS BETWEEN ITALY AND THE UNITED STATES CONCERNING EMIGRATION POLICY, DIPLOMACY, AND ANTI-IMMIGRANT SENTIMENT, 1870-1927 by Patrizia Famà Stahle May 2010 In the late 1800s, the United States was the great destination of Italian emigrants. In North America, employers considered Italians industrious individuals, but held them in low esteem.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Diplomacy in Europe
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 102 067 SO 008 107 AUTHOR Haigh, Anthony TITLE Cultural Diplomacy in Europe. INSTITUTION Council for Cultural Cooperation, Strasbourg (France). PUB DATE 74 NOTE 223p. AVAILABLE FROM Manhattan Publishing Co., 225 Lafayette Street, New York, New York 10012 ($9.50) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC Not Available from EDRS. PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Cultural Exchange; Cultural Interrelationships; *Diplomatic History; European History; Exchange Programs; Foreign Countries; Foreign Policy; *Foreign Relations; *Intercultural Programs; *International Education; Political Science IDENTIFIERS *Europe; France; Germany; Italy; United Kingdom ABSTRACT The evolution of European government activities in the sphere of international cultural relations is examined. Section 1 describes the period between World War I and World War II when European governments tried to enhance their prestige and policies by means of cultural propaganda. Section 2 analyzes the period during World War II when the cohabitation of several exiled governments in the United Kingdom led to the impetus and development of both bilateral and collective forms of cultural diplomacy. The third section deals with the cultural diplomacy of specific countries including France, Italy, the Federal German Republic, and the United Kingdom. French cultural diplomacy is presented at the model, and an attempt is made to show how the other three countries vary from that model. Section 4 examines the collective experiences of three groups of countries in the field of cultural diplomacy. Attention is first given to the largely homogeneous group of five Nordic countries, which evolved a practice of collective cultural diplomacy among themselves. By way of contrast, the seven countries of the Western European Union including Belgium, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, France, Luxembourg, the Federal German Republic, and Italy exhibit a system of collective cultural cooperation worked out to implement a clause of a treaty after World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Pellagra in Late Nineteenth Century Italy: Effects of a Deficiency Disease
    Monica GINNAIO* Pellagra in Late Nineteenth Century Italy: Effects of a Deficiency Disease Pellagra, a nutritional defi ciency disease linked to a defi cit in vitamin B3 (niacin), affected – and until recently continued to affect – poor populations whose diet consisted almost exclusively of maize (corn) for prolonged periods. It appeared in the eighteenth century, and up to the early twentieth it was still found in parts of Italy, Spain, Portugal, Eastern Europe and the United States. In the twentieth century, pellagra was present in Egypt and some eastern and southern African countries, including South Africa. In this article, which focuses on nineteenth-century Italy and particularly the Veneto, the most severely affected Italian region, Monica GINNAIO reviews the history and epidemiology of the disease, then analyses differences in prevalence and mortality by region, occupational status, age group and sex. She shows the predominance of the disease among the most disadvantaged social groups and women of reproductive age, though no massive impact on fertility has been detected. The main purpose of this study is to identify why the disease known as pellagra, endemic in Italy in the late nineteenth century, was strongly selective by place of residence, occupational category, age and sex. Pellagra is a vitamin defi ciency disease caused by a diet consisting almost exclusively of maize (corn), and was particularly severe among farming families in Veneto and Lombardy from the late eighteenth century to the interwar period. To better understand the social “preferences” of pellagra, this study adopts several analytic perspectives – epidemiology, history, history of medicine, gender studies and social history – thereby bringing to light the connections between the cultural, social and epidemiological factors that led to this selection, a selection that was not without demographic consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thun-Hohenstein University Reforms 1849–1860
    The Thun-Hohenstein University Reforms 1849–1860 Conception – Implementation – Aftermath Edited by Christof Aichner and Brigitte Mazohl VERÖFFENTLICHUNGEN DER KOMMISSION FÜR NEUERE GESCHICHTE ÖSTERREICHS Band 115 Kommission für Neuere Geschichte Österreichs Vorsitzende: em. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Brigitte Mazohl Stellvertretender Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Reinhard Stauber Mitglieder: Dr. Franz Adlgasser Univ.-Prof. Dr. Peter Becker Univ.-Prof. i. R. Dr. Ernst Bruckmüller Univ.-Prof. Dr. Laurence Cole Univ.-Prof. Dr. Margret Friedrich Univ.-Prof. Dr. Elisabeth Garms-Cornides Univ.-Prof. Dr. Michael Gehler Univ.-Doz. Mag. Dr. Andreas Gottsmann Univ.-Prof. Dr. Margarete Grandner em. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Hanns Haas Univ.-Prof. i. R. Dr. Wolfgang Häusler Univ.-Prof. i. R. Dr. Ernst Hanisch Univ.-Prof. Dr. Gabriele Haug-Moritz Dr. Michael Hochedlinger Univ.-Prof. Dr. Lothar Höbelt Mag. Thomas Just Univ.-Prof. i. R. Dr. Grete Klingenstein em. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Alfred Kohler Univ.-Prof. Dr. Christopher Laferl Gen. Dir. Univ.-Doz. Dr. Wolfgang Maderthaner Dr. Stefan Malfèr Gen. Dir. i. R. H.-Prof. Dr. Lorenz Mikoletzky Dr. Gernot Obersteiner Dr. Hans Petschar em. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Helmut Rumpler Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Martin Scheutz em. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Gerald Stourzh Univ.-Prof. Dr. Arno Strohmeyer Univ.-Prof. i. R. Dr. Arnold Suppan Univ.-Doz. Dr. Werner Telesko Univ.-Prof. Dr. Thomas Winkelbauer Sekretär: Dr. Christof Aichner The Thun-Hohenstein University Reforms 1849–1860 Conception – Implementation – Aftermath Edited by Christof Aichner and Brigitte Mazohl Published with the support from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): PUB 397-G28 Open access: Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
    [Show full text]
  • The Executive Board of UNESCO: Special Edition
    LeLeLe ConseilConseilConseil exécutifexécutifexécutif 200200200eee OrganisationOrganisationOrganisation SESSIONSESSIONSESSION desdesdes Nations NationsNations Unies UniesUnies pourpourpour l’éducation, l’éducation,l’éducation, de l’UNESCOde l’UNESCOde l’UNESCO lalala science sciencescience et etet la lala culture cultureculture ÉditionÉditionÉdition speciale specialespeciale Special Edition / Édition speciale Special Edition / Édition speciale Special Edition / Édition speciale session session session e e e 200th / 200 200th / 200 200th / 200 • • • Special Edition Edition Edition Special Special Special Cultural Organization Organization Organization Cultural Cultural Cultural of UNESCO UNESCO UNESCO of of of Educational, Scientific and and and Scientific Scientific Scientific Educational, Educational, Educational, United Nations Nations Nations United United United SESSION SESSION SESSION 200th 200th 200th The Executive Board Board Executive Executive The The The Executive Board Executive The / Conseil exécutif Executive Board / Conseil exécutif Executive Board / Conseil exécutif Executive Board • • • UNESCO UNESCO UNESCO Printed in France France in in Printed Printed SCX/2016/BROCHURE/200/EXECUTIVE BOARD BOARD SCX/2016/BROCHURE/200/EXECUTIVE SCX/2016/BROCHURE/200/EXECUTIVE © UNESCO 2016 2016 UNESCO UNESCO © © UNESCO Workshops Workshops UNESCO UNESCO Composed and Printed in the the the in in Printed Printed and and Composed Composed Photos UNESCO, UN, Archivo Fotogrfico de la FUNDACIN PABLO NERUDA, Aleksandrs Dunasovs, used by permission
    [Show full text]
  • 150 Years of Plans, Geological Survey and Drilling for the Fréjus to Mont Blanc Tunnels Across the Alpine Chain: an Historical Review
    Ital. J. Geosci., Vol. 140, No. 2 (2021), pp. 169-204, 13 figs. (https://doi.org/10.3301/IJG.2020.29) © Società Geologica Italiana, Roma 2021 150 years of plans, geological survey and drilling for the Fréjus to Mont Blanc tunnels across the Alpine chain: an historical review GIORGIO V. DAL PIAZ (1) & ALESSIO ARGENTIERI (2) ABSTRACT Geology and tunneling have close interactions and mutual benefits. Preventive geology allow to optimize the technical design, reduce Since Roman age, people living on both sides of the Alps had been costs and minimize bitter surprises. Conversely, systematic survey seeking different ‘north-west passages’, first overriding the mountains during excavation of deep tunnels has provided innovative data for and then moving under them. The first idea of a tunnel under the the advance of geosciences. Mont Blanc was envisaged by de Saussure in 1787. In the 19th century a growing railway network played a fundamental role for the Industrial Revolution, but was hampered for the southern countries KEY WORDS: history of geosciences, Fréjus and Mont Blanc, by the barrier of the Alps, so that modern transalpine railways became transalpine tunnels, Western and Central Alps. essential for the Reign of Sardinia. This paper presents an historical review of first suggestions, projects, field survey, failed attempts and successful drilling works across the Alps, from the Frejus (1871), San Gottardo (1882) and Simplon (1906) railway tunnels to the Grand INTRODUCTION St Bernard (1964) and Mont Blanc (1965) highway tunnels, relived within the advances of regional geology and mapping. The Fréjus tunnel was conceived by Medal, projected by Maus between Modane The ancient roads which ran from Rome to the and Bardonèche and approved by a ministerial commission, but it provinces of the Roman Empire formed a vast network was abandoned due to the insurrection of 1848.
    [Show full text]
  • Padre Agostino Gemelli and the Crusade to Rechristianize Italy, 1878–1959: Part One
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2010 Padre Agostino Gemelli and the crusade to rechristianize Italy, 1878–1959: Part one J. Casey Hammond Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the European History Commons, and the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Hammond, J. Casey, "Padre Agostino Gemelli and the crusade to rechristianize Italy, 1878–1959: Part one" (2010). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 3684. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3684 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3684 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Padre Agostino Gemelli and the crusade to rechristianize Italy, 1878–1959: Part one Abstract Padre Agostino Gemelli (1878-1959) was an outstanding figure in Catholic culture and a shrewd operator on many levels in Italy, especially during the Fascist period. Yet he remains little examined or understood. Scholars tend to judge him solely in light of the Fascist regime and mark him as the archetypical clerical fascist. Gemelli founded the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore in Milan in 1921, the year before Mussolini came to power, in order to form a new leadership class for a future Catholic state. This religiously motivated political goal was intended to supersede the anticlerical Liberal state established by the unifiers of modern Italy in 1860. After Mussolini signed the Lateran Pacts with the Vatican in 1929, Catholicism became the officialeligion r of Italy and Gemelli’s university, under the patronage of Pope Pius XI (1922-1939), became a laboratory for Catholic social policies by means of which the church might bring the Fascist state in line with canon law and papal teachings.
    [Show full text]
  • Archivio Jacini
    Archivio di Stato di Cremona Archivio Jacini Titolo I Famiglia Jacini Revisione 2019 a cura di Silvia Rigato con la collaborazione dei volontari del Servizio Civile Nazionale anno 2017-2018 II L’archivio Jacini è stato depositato in Archivio di Stato nel 2016. Si presentava sostanzialmente già ordinato e corredato da inventari manoscritti redatti a metà Novecento da Francesco Forte, archivista presso l’Archivio di Stato Milano, su incarico di Stefano Jacini. Le carte sono state suddivise da Forte in cinque titoli: Famiglia, Fondi e case, Amministrazione, Ditta Jacini, Miscellanea. In questa sede si propone la trascrizione del primo titolo, diviso a sua volta in gruppi, ciascuno dei quali corrispondente a un membro della famiglia. Nel lavoro di trascrizione e revisione degli inventari, si è cercato il più possibile di rispettare l’ordinamento di Francesco Forte, salvo che per i gruppi 28 e 33, in cui erano state aggiunte a posteriori delle buste in coda a quelle già riordinate ed erano stati scambiati o modificati (aggiunti o sottratti) i contenuti di numerosi fascicoli. In questi casi si è optato per il riordino complessivo del gruppo: rimandiamo pertanto alle note introduttive di queste sezioni per i dettagli. Ove possibile, inoltre, è stata riunita in un unico fascicolo la corrispondenza di uno stesso mittente al fine di alleggerire la descrizione che, pur essendo ancora molto analitica, è ora meno ripetitiva. A fronte dei cambiamenti apportati, il presente inventario riporta sia la nuova fascicolazione, sia le precedenti segnature assegnate da Francesco Forte; in tal modo rimane la possibilità di operare un riscontro con gli inventari manoscritti e al contempo non si perde traccia della loro posizione originaria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Executive Board of UNESCO: 2012 Edition; 2012
    The Executive Board of UNESCO 2012 Edition The Executive Board of the United Nations Educational, Scientifi c and Cultural Organization The meeting room of the Executive Board, where the delegates sit in a circle, symbolizes the equal dignity of all the Members, while the ceiling design repre- sents the convergence of minds in a single keystone. © UNESCO/Dominique Roger All the terms used in this text to designate the person discharging duties or functions are to be interpreted as implying that men and women are equally eligible to fi ll any post or seat associated with the discharge of these duties and functions. The Executive Board of UNESCO 2012 edition United Nations Educational, Scientifi c and Cultural Organization First published in 1979 and reprinted biennially as a revised edition 16th edition Published in 2012 by the United Nations Educational, Scientifi c and Cultural Organization Composed and printed in the workshops of UNESCO 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP © UNESCO 2012 SCX/2012/BROCH/CONSEIL EXECUTIF TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................7 III. Structure .............................................18 Subsidiary bodies ....................................18 Commissions ..........................................18 A. Executive Board .................................9 Committees ............................................19 Working and drafting groups......................19 I. Composition .........................................9 Bureau of the Board .................................19
    [Show full text]
  • The Failure of Italian Nationhood: the Geopolitics of a Troubled Identity Manlio Graziano, September 2010 the Failure of Italian Nationhood
    Italian and Italian American Studies Stanislao G. Pugliese Hofstra University Series Editor This publishing initiative seeks to bring the latest scholarship in Italian and Italian American history, literature, cinema, and cultural studies to a large audience of specialists, general readers, and students. Italian and Italian American Studies (I&IAS) will feature works on modern Italy (Renaissance to the present) and Italian American culture and society by established scholars as well as new voices in the academy. This endeavor will help to shape the evolving fields of I&IAS by reemphasizing the connec- tion between the two. The following editorial board consists of esteemed senior scholars who act as advisors to the series editor. REBECCA WEST JOSEPHINE GATTUSO HENDIN University of Chicago New York University FRED GARDAPHÉ PHILIP V. CANNISTRARO† Queens College, CUNY Queens College and the Graduate School, CUNY ALESSANDRO PORTELLI Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Queer Italia: Same-Sex Desire in Italian Literature and Film edited by Gary P. Cestaro, July 2004 Frank Sinatra: History, Identity, and Italian American Culture edited by Stanislao G. Pugliese, October 2004 The Legacy of Primo Levi edited by Stanislao G. Pugliese, December 2004 Italian Colonialism edited by Ruth Ben-Ghiat and Mia Fuller, July 2005 Mussolini’s Rome: Rebuilding the Eternal City Borden W. Painter, Jr., July 2005 Representing Sacco and Vanzetti edited by Jerome H. Delamater and Mary Anne Trasciatti, September 2005 Carlo Tresca: Portrait of a Rebel Nunzio Pernicone, October 2005 Italy in the Age of Pinocchio: Children and Danger in the Liberal Era Carl Ipsen, April 2006 The Empire of Stereotypes: Germaine de Staël and the Idea of Italy Robert Casillo, May 2006 Race and the Nation in Liberal Italy, 1861–1911: Meridionalism, Empire, and Diaspora Aliza S.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Forms, Capital Democratization and Innovation:Ion
    Monika Poettinger Bocconi University, Milan BUSINESS FORMS, CAPITAL DEMOCRATIZATION AND INNOVATIONION:::: MILAN IN THE 1850s ABSTRACT Lombardy´s economy in the 1850´s was characterized by extensive networks of personal relations, credit by trust and family businesses. Milan´s wealth was maximized by maintaining the mercantile identity of the city, while manufacturing innovation was pursued only when economic profitable or strategic to further growth. Thanks to a sample including extensive data on almost two hundred firms in existence in Milan from 1852 to 1861, it is possible to reconstruct the mechanisms governing such economy: how liquidity was collected and distributed, how partnerships were formed, inside which social circles were partners found, how much kinship ties determined business decisions, what criteria proved relevant in the investment decision making processes, how were innovation and entrepreneurship rewarded. The picture emerging from the sample will vindicate the capacity of Milan´s mercantile elite to foster innovation through the efficient allocation of capital and the creation of entrepreneurial capital, averting at the same time disastrous financial crises: the solid base of the successive development of the region. Monika Poettinger MILAN IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY “Each sharecropping farm, in Lombardy, produces rice, cheese and silk to be sold for considerable sums, and also every other possible product; it is an inexhaustible land where everything is cheap” 1 Milan´s onlookers in the middle of the nineteenth century saw an incredible richness apparently springing from the surrounding agriculture. Entrepreneurship, on the contrary, was considered scarce 2 and local manufactures judged as hopelessly lagging behind English ones.
    [Show full text]