DOCSLIB.ORG

2.3 Subject- and Name-Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2.3 Subject- and Name-Index Bibliography Karl R. Popper 2.3 Literature on Karl Popper and his Work Subject and Name Index (Current state: June 2021) A 2008, Niemann 1994, Niemann 2021, Paitlová A priori: see Apriori 2017, Pandit 2019, Wettersten 2015, Zeman Abduktion: see Abduction 2009 Abduction: Chauviré 1981, Chauviré/Brun-Rovet Alexander, Jeffrey: Schmid 1989 2005, Niiniluoto 2005, Schurz 2002 Alfvén, Hannes: Brush 1992 — abductive inference: Zee Ma 2009 Alienation: Loughlin 1999 — inductive reasoning: Flach/Kakas 2000 Alles Leben ist Problemlösen: Thomas 2003 — truthlikeness: Niiniluoto 2005 Alltagsdenken: see Thought, ordinary Abgrenzung: see Demarcation (Problem) Alpbach: Kanitscheider 1985, Molden 2001 Absolutism: Agassi 1996 Althusser, Louis: Green 1984, Patton 1979 Absolutismus: see Absolutism Altruism (pedagogy): Ydegaard 2013 Academia: Fuller 2019 Analyse: see Analysis Acceptability: Swinburne 1971 Analysis: Accounting Theory: Dewhirst 1987, Hines 1988, — , critical: Chmielewski 1995 Lima/Gerigk/Ribeiro 2016, Lindsay 1993 — , philosophical: Lammer 2010 Action: — , semiotic (Popper criteria): Braun 1975 — knowledge: Lepee 1997 — , transactional: MacAlmon 1985 — openness: Kammertöns 2015 — error analysis: Wuketits 2018 — rationalism: O’Hear 1975, Schmid 1985 Anarchie: see Anarchy — scientific theory: Baruch 2002 Anarchy: Schwember Augier 2016 — theory: see Theory of Action Anaximander: Coniglione 1977 Activity (biological origin): Niemann 2014 Angst: see Anxiety Actuarial Method: Ryder 1976 Anomaly: Brauns 2021 Ad hoc hypothesis: see Hypothesis/Hypotheses (ad Antarctica: Belza 1973 hoc) Antarktis: see Antarctica ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder): Anthropic Principle: Smolin 2007 Johnson/Wiersema/Kuntsi 2009 Anthropologie: see Anthropology Adler, Alfred: Jacoby 1976, Tachibana 2012 Anthropology: Chagnon 2013, Gellner 1988, Administration: Behr 1979 Minnini 1980, Murray 2018 Adorno, Theodor W.: Albert 1999, Araujo Ramos — Open Society: Shankland 2005 2017, Borghini 2015, Buttiglione 1991, De — psychoanalysis: Elfakir 1994 Angelis 2015, Frisby 1972, Ganem 2011, Anti-Authority: Cruickshank 2013 Jahnson 1975, Musgrave 1972, Najafi 2005, Anti-Dogmatism: Bar-Am/Agassi 2005, Martínez Nölle 2004, Wilson 1986 Roldán 2002, Massarenti 1997 Aesthetics: Agassi/Jarvie 2008, Hochkeppel 1994, Anti-Empiricism: Alcaro 1981 Kulka 1989, Richmond 1994, Verstegen 2004 Anti-Fundamentalism: Cambier 2006, Pelaez — , evolutionary: Chmielewski 2020 Cedrés 2003 Agassi, Joseph: Bar-Am/Gattei 2017, Laor 2017 Anti-Historism: Cotroneo 1975, Dobrijanov 1969, Agnosticism: Jakovljević 2015, Schneeberger 1976, Macdonald 1995, Paolozzi 1986, Vidarte 2008 Smart 2011 Anti-Illusionist: Albert 1972 Agnostizismus: see Agnosticism Anti-Inductivism: Afisi 2016, Antiseri 2002, Fuller Agriculture, industrial: Funk 2009 2012, Motterlini 1989, Motterlini 1992, Tabot Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz: Zinkiewicz 2014 2015 Aktivität: see Activity — psychology: Hwang 2010 Akzeptanz von Theorien: see Theories, acceptance Anti-Justificationalism: Diller 2006, Diller 2008 of Anti-Marxism: Milhau 1979 Albert, Hans: Afshari 1996, Antiseri 1986, Dahms Anti-Militarism: Bosetti 2003 2019, Franco 2012, Gadenne 2012, Gadenne/ Anti-Naturalism: Caponi 1999 Neck 2021, Habermas 1964, Hilgendorf 2006, Anti-Platonism: Unger 1949 Kapeller/Ferschli 2018, Lütge 2002, Mehnert 1 Anti-Popper: Buzgalin 2003, Hofmann 2004, Artificial Intelligence: Gillies 1998, Meyer 2018, Melberg 1996 Sloman 1985 Anti-Positivism: Robbins 1999 — falsificationism: Giza 2013 Anti-Psychologism: Batiéno 2016, Viale 2012 — induction: Gillies 2004, Giza 2013, Tamburrini Anti-Realism: Albert 1996, Albert 2002, 2006 Hinterberger 1996, Hinterberger 2016, Sarkar Artwork/Artworks: Riesel 1999 1998, Trundle 2015 — open artwork: Bassler 1999 Anti-Relativism: Wettström 2006 Artigas, Marino: Herce 2016, Marcos 2016 Anti-Utopianism: Paden 2000 Artist’s Statements: Bicknell 2019 Anxiety: Hall 2019 Asimov, Isaac: Taylor 1988 Apartheid: Laurence/Zyl/Slabbert 1973 Ästhetik: see Aesthetics Approximationstheorie der Wahrheit: see Truth, Astrology: Eysenck 1990 approximation Atheism: Smart 2011 Apriori: Callahan 2006, Hahn 1981, Samra 2009 Athens: Hacohen 2002 — judgements: Drieschner 2005 Äther-Theorie: see Ether Theory Apriori-Urteile: see Apriori, judgements Atombombe: see Nuclear bomb Apriorism: Bramoullé 1995, Di Iorio 2008, Valor Atomic Theory: Buchdahl 1959 Yébenes 2004 Aufklärung: see Enlightenment — , conjectural: Champion 2011 Aufnahmefähigkeit: see Comprehension — , fallible: Champion 2011, Smith 1991 Augustine (of Hippo): Wüstenberg 1991 — Mises, Ludwig v.: Di Iorio 2008, Warin 2005 Ausbildung: see Education (Ausbildung, Erziehung) Archaeology: Haber/Scribano 1993, Rohrhirsch see also: Education (Bildung) 2002 Aussageinhalt: see Statements, content of Archetypes: Aussagen: see Statements — , political: Jacobs 1987 Austrian School of Economics: Campagnolo 2016, Architecture: Boţic 2014, Deyong 2016 Cubeddu 1987 Archival Studies: Uhlmann 2017 Auswahl, natürliche: see Natural Selection Arendt, Hannah: Penders 2009 Autobiography: Stadler 1986, Zimmer 2018 Argumentation: Corcoran 1989, Jales Ribeiro 2014, Autonomy: Jales Ribeiro 2016, Jales Ribeiro 2021 — , cognitive: Di Iorio 2015 Argument/Arguments: Topitsch 1989, Weinert — of science: Krige 1978 1982 Authority (scientific): Deichmann 2011, Skoyles — , effective: Percival 2021 1992 — , transcendental: Chauvier/Boyer 2000 Avenarius, Richard: Perkins 2014 — analysis: Stillwaggon Swan 2011 Averroes: Gatherer 1998 — mathematics: Bendegem 2005 Avicenna: Haggi 2002, Uyanik 2012 Aristotelianism: Dąbek 2019 Axiomatic System/Systems: Binder/Piecha 2017, Aristotle: Büttemeyer 2005, Childers 2009, Chillón Leeb 2002 2015, Christiansen-Poscher 2003, Drouet 2012, Axiomatization (Kolmogorov): Lyon 2016 Fayos Febrer 2002, Frey/Schmalzried 2013, Klein 2000, Mariano da Rosa 2021, Meyer B 2006, Seddighin 2003, Seitz 2008 Bachelard, Gaston: Banywesize Mukambilwa 2017, Arithmetic: Frank 1999 Boyer 2917, Castellana 2005, Jallais 1987, Armut: see Poverty Lawless 2012, Mboui Nguema 2009, Pera 1974, Arnheim, Rudolf: Verstegen 2004, Verstegen 2018 Talla 1989, Valdrè 1976, Valdrè 1984, Vartany Arrow of Time: Bailer-Jones 2006, Esfeld 2007, 2001 Ghins 1986, Ghins 2006, Grünbaum 1974, Background Knowledge: Kamps 2005 Takamura 2011 Bacon, Francis (Philosopher): Cohen 1978, Fisk Art: Bellini 2005, Coren 1995, Fricke 2006, Gablik 2004, Linguiti 1978, Mariano da Rosa 2021, 1973, Pietruska-Madej 2001, Rizzacasa 1979 Morowitz 2001, Themoteo 2009, Urbach 1982 see also: Painting — experimental biology: Deichmann 2017 — appreciation of art (Kunstbetrachtung): — fallibilism: Oliva 2007 Schramm 2003 — induction: Knutsen 2015 — future: Millán 2016 Balkan: see Countries and Regions, Balkans — history: Nille 2018 Banking: — progress: Le Cocq 2016, Neumaier 2002 — Open Society: Notturno/Rod 2013 — politics: Rathi 2015 Bankwesen: see Banking — theory: see Theory of Art Banton, Michael: Leoussi 2020 — World 3: Lube 2016 Bartley, William Warren: Agassi 2012, Champion Arten, gefährdete: see Species, endangered 2013, Cíntora 2002, Diller 2013, Miller 1990 Arthritis: Ebringer/Rashid/Wilson 2010, Ebringer Basis: 2012 — , empirical: see Empirical Basis 2 — problems (Basisprobleme): Andersson 1998, Bildung: see Education (Bildung) Keuth 2006, Parszyk 2013, Rutte 2002, Warkus see also: Education (Ausbildung, Erziehung) 2003 Bildungswissenschaft: see Educational Science — sentences (Basissätze): Andersson 2013, Bio-Epistemology: Nsonsissa 2017 Gadenne 2018, Koterski 2006, Nola 1992, Bioethics: Sganzerla/Oliveira 2012 Paimann 2011, Shearmur 2016 Biogeography, historical: Platnick/Nelson 1978 Bateson, Gregory: Reershemius 1999 Biographical: Bühler/Fischer 1985, Schimanko Bayesian Statistics: Dienes 2008, Dorling 1981, 2011 Earman 1992, Festa 1993, Festa 1995, Fitelson — chronology: Morgenstern 201 1999, Fitelson 2001, Goode 1975, Hammerton Biography, intellectual: Launay 2002, Brantingham 1968, Howson/Franklin 1985, Negrete Martínez 2007, Hacohen 1993, Hacohen 1996, Hacohen 1982, Ryder 1972, Schurz 2005, Skoyles 2008, 1998, Hacohen 1999, Hacohen 2000, Hacohen Tarantola 2006, Walliser/Zwirn 2002 2001, Hacohen 2007, Kogawara 1997, Bayesianism: Portugal/Hermann 2014, Roche 2017, Leezenberg 2002, Mundó 2007, Wettersten Stegmüller 1973 2005, Zimmer 2018 — medicine: Malvasi/Realdi 2002 Bioinformatics: Allen 2001, Johansson 2006 — physics: Walker 2008 Biokosmologie: see Evolutionism, bio- Bayle, Pierre: Lennon 1997 cosmological Beckett, Samuel: Anonym 2000, Feldman 2006, Biology: Bradie 1996, Currie 2003, Faith/Trueman Feldman 2010, Uhlmann 2017 2001, Niemann 2018, Settle 1996, Speijer 2020, Bedeutung: see Meaning Stamos 2007, Vicedo 1985, Wouters 2005 Begründung: see Justification — , evolutionary: Markl 2016, Junker 2016, Begründungsurteile: see Justification, judgements Niemann 2013, Niemann 2014, Niemann 2016, Behauptungen (Wissenschaft): see Scientific Platnick/Gaffney 1978, Samadi 2011, Stamos Propositions 1996 Behaviorism: O’Donohue/Noll 1995 — , experimental: Deichmann 2017 Behinderung: see Disability — activity: Niemann 2014 Belief: Cruickshank 2013, Na'azemi 2002 — Code Biology (Marcello Barbieri): Stillwaggon — revision: Baltag/Smets 2008, Li/Sui 2018 Swan 2014 — scientific discovery: Bagood 1996 — evolution: Markl 2016 Benedikt XVI (Pope): Franco 2010 — freedom: Niemann 2014 Benetton, Luciano: Baldini 2003 — knowledge: Niemann 2014, Riedl 1979 Bentham, Jeremy: Jacobs 1991 — philosophy: Arana 1997, Diéguez 2004, Rieppel Beobachtung: see Observation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Optimistic Realism About Scientific Progress
    Optimistic Realism about Scientific Progress Ilkka Niiniluoto ABSTRACT: Scientific realists use the “no miracle argument” to show that the empirical and pragmatic success of science is an indicator of the ability of scientific theories to give true or truthlike representations of unobservable reality. While antirealists define scientific progress in terms of empirical success or practical problem-solving, realists characterize progress by using some truth-related criteria. This paper defends the definition of scientific progress as increasing truthlikeness or verisimilitude. Antirealists have tried to rebut realism with the “pessimistic metainduction”, but critical realists turn this argument into an optimistic view about progressive science. KEYWORDS: conceptual pluralism, fallibilism, no miracle argument, pessimistic metainduction, scientific realism, truthlikeness 1. Varieties of Scientific Realism Scientific realism as a philosophical position has (i) ontological, (ii) semantical, (iii) epistemological, (iv) theoretical, and (v) methodological aspects (see Niiniluoto 1999a; Psillos 1999). It holds that (i) at least part of reality is ontologically independent of human mind and culture. It takes (ii) truth to involve a non-epistemic relation between language and reality. It claims that (iii) knowledge about mind-independent (as well as mind-dependent) reality is possible, and that (iv) the best and deepest part of such knowledge is provided by empirically testable scientific theories. An important aim of science is (v) to find true and informative theories which postulate non-observable entities and laws to explain observable phenomena. Scientific realism became a tenable stance in the philosophy of science in the 1950s as an alternative to empiricist views which reduced theories to the observational language (Ernst Mach’s positivism) or restricted scientific knowledge to the level of observational statements by denying that theoretical statements have truth values (Pierre Duhem’s instrumentalism).
    [Show full text]
  • Antisemitismus Im 19. Jahrhundert Aus Internationaler Perspektive
    Marcel Stoetzler Durkheim’s and Simmel’sreactionstoantisemitism and their reflection in their views on modern society If one ever asked oneself what sociologyisall about, one could do worse than consulting Auguste Comte’s 1822 manifesto, Prospectus des travaux scientifiques nØcessaires pour rØorganiser la societØ,the Plan of the Scientific Works Necessary for the Reorganization of Society.1 It sketches out the historical-structural task that the new discipline,whose name Comte later popularized, was supposed to fulfil, namely to end-but-preserve—as the Germans would say, aufzuheben—the Revolution: safeguard its achievements from reaction as well as from further revolutions. Sociologywould do so by separating the good bits of modernity from the bad bits. The former Comte sawasgrounded in asecular,macro- historical trend of European historyand civilization, the latter in the undis- ciplined hubris of troublemakers led astraybymetaphysicalnonsense peddled by the Enlightenment, or more precisely,bythe non-positivistic strand of the Enlightenment.Sociologywould study and understand the laws of historyand silence the metaphysical troublemakers. Sociology’s commitmenttomaking thatmessy thing called societysafe for modernity(the industrial-capitalist world system of nation states constituted and populated by modernindividuals) remained tricky.Spanners were thrown into the machineryleft, right, and centrebypeople whowere not so positive about the positivestate of society. Rather ironically,most of those whocontinued and developed the Comtean projectofsociologydid so by basing it on some of those ghastly metaphysical ideas from the Enlightenment, notably those of Immanuel Kant. Sociology, at least in France and Germany, emerged mostly as a set of differing blends of positivism and Kantian, or neo-Kantian, idealism.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanislaw Brzozowski and the Migration of Ideas
    Jens Herlth, Edward M. Świderski (eds.) Stanisław Brzozowski and the Migration of Ideas Lettre Jens Herlth, Edward M. Świderski (eds.) with assistance by Dorota Kozicka Stanisław Brzozowski and the Migration of Ideas Transnational Perspectives on the Intellectual Field in Twentieth-Century Poland and Beyond This volume is one of the outcomes of the research project »Standing in the Light of His Thought: Stanisław Brzozowski and Polish Intellectual Life in the 20th and 21st Centuries« funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (project no. 146687). The publication of this book was made possible thanks to the generous support of the »Institut Littéraire Kultura«. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Na- tionalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommer- cial-NoDerivatives 4.0 (BY-NC-ND) which means that the text may be used for non-commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ To create an adaptation, translation, or derivative of the original work and for com- mercial use, further permission is required and can be obtained by contacting [email protected] Creative Commons license terms for re-use do not apply to any content (such as graphs, figures, photos, excerpts, etc.) not original to the Open Access publication and further permission may be required from the rights holder. The obligation to research and clear permission lies solely with the party re-using the material.
    [Show full text]
  • On Moral Understanding
    COMMENTTHE COLLEGE NEWSLETTER ISSUE NO 147 | MAY 2003 TOM WHIPPS On Moral Understanding DNA pioneers: The surviving members of the King’s team, who worked on the discovery of the structure of DNA 50 years ago, withDavid James Watson, K Levytheir Cambridge ‘rival’ at the time. From left Ray Gosling, Herbert Wilson, DNA at King’s: DepartmentJames Watson and of Maurice Philosophy Wilkins King’s College the continuing story University of London Prize for his contribution – and A day of celebrations their teams, but also to subse- quent generations of scientists at ver 600 guests attended a cant scientific discovery of the King’s. unique day of events celeb- 20th century,’ in the words of Four Nobel Laureates – Mau- Orating King’s role in the 50th Principal Professor Arthur Lucas, rice Wilkins, James Watson, Sid- anniversary of the discovery of the ‘and their research changed ney Altman and Tim Hunt – double helix structure of DNA on the world’. attended the event which was so 22 April. The day paid tribute not only to oversubscribed that the proceed- Scientists at King’s played a King’s DNA pioneers Rosalind ings were relayed by video link to fundamental role in this momen- Franklin and Maurice Wilkins – tous discovery – ‘the most signifi- who went onto win the Nobel continued on page 2 2 Funding news | 3 Peace Operations Review | 5 Widening participation | 8 25 years of Anglo-French law | 11 Margaret Atwood at King’s | 12 Susan Gibson wins Rosalind Franklin Award | 15 Focus: School of Law | 16 Research news | 18 Books | 19 KCLSU election results | 20 Arts abcdef U N I V E R S I T Y O F L O N D O N A C C O M M O D A T I O N O F F I C E ACCOMMODATION INFORMATION - FINDING SOMEWHERE TO LIVE IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy WARNING: Under no circumstances inshould the this University document be of taken London as providing legal advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Models, Perspectives, and Scientific Realism
    MODELS, PERSPECTIVES, AND SCIENTIFIC REALISM: ON RONALD GIERE'S PERSPECTIVAL REALISM A thesis submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Brian R. Huth May, 2014 Thesis written by Brian R. Huth B.A., Kent State University 2012 M.A., Kent State University 2014 Approved by Frank X. Ryan, Advisor Linda Williams, Chair, Department of Philosophy James L. Blank, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................. iv INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER I. FROM THE RECEIVED VIEW TO THE MODEL-THEORETIC VIEW........................................................................................................... 7 Section 1.1.................................................................................................... 9 Section 1.2.................................................................................................... 16 II. RONALD GIERE'S CONSTRUCTIVISM AND PERSPECTIVAL REALISM.................................................................................................... 25 Section 2.1.................................................................................................... 25 Section 2.2.................................................................................................... 31 Section 2.3...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of the Philosophy of Science in Japan
    Some Aspects of the Philosophy of Science in Japan By Hiroshi NAGAI I Philosophy in its strict sense had not been in Japan until her mod ern age, which broke out at Meiji Revolution about one hundred years ago. It must be remembered that the proper notion of philosophy has its historical origin in ancient Greece and that its development is performed on the basis of Greek tradition in Western Europe. From this point of view we Japanese have been in quite different circum stances from those of European peoples, whose philosophies, I presume, for all varieties in their character and trend, are united in a common mental circle, so that they are on intimate terms with one another. Of course, as generally recognized, it is an irresistibly clear fact that Buddhism and Confucianism had influenced intrinsically on the mental life of Japanese people for a long time, but their doctrines may not be called philosophic in the proper sense. We prefer to consider them respectively a sort of religious speculation or peculiar worldly Wisdom rather than as philosophy. This state of affairs will be said to be due to the special historical and geographical conditions in which our country was so long situated that we could hardly take any chance of international contact with European peoples and their philosophical thoughts. As the leading and decisive one of those conditions we can especially point out the political and social influences of the feudal -63- 64 government, which was established by the Tokugawas and lasted for almost three hundred years; its political absolutism strictly prohibited our countrymen living in four small islands from taking foreign informations.
    [Show full text]
  • From Premodern to Modern American Jurisprudence: the Onset of Positivism
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 50 Issue 6 Issue 6 - November 1997 Article 1 11-1997 From Premodern to Modern American Jurisprudence: The Onset of Positivism Stephen M. Feldman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Stephen M. Feldman, From Premodern to Modern American Jurisprudence: The Onset of Positivism, 50 Vanderbilt Law Review 1387 (1997) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol50/iss6/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 50 NOVEMBER 1997 NUMBER 6 From Premodern to Modern American Jurisprudence: The Onset of Positivism Stephen M. Feldman* I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 1387 II. PREMODERN LEGAL SCIENCE .............................................. 1394 III. MODERN LEGAL SCIENCE .................................................... 1417 IV. CONCLUSION ........................................................................ 1439 I. INTRODUCTION What distinguished premodern from modern American juris- prudence? Whereas most commentators agree that the transition from premodernism to modernism occurred around the Civil War,' * Professor of Law and Political Science, University of Tulsa. I thank Paul Finkelman, Thomas C. Grey, Robert W. Gordon, Tony Sebok, Jim Mooney, Mark Tushnet, Marty Belsky, and Bill Hollingsworth for their helpful comments on earlier drafts. I also appreciate the financial support of the Faculty Summer Research Grant Program of the University of Tulsa College of Law. 1. See Stephen M. Feldman, From Modernism to Postmodernism in American Legal Thought: The Significance of the Warren Court, in Bernard Schwartz, ed., The Warren Court: A Retrospective 324, 329 (Oxford U., 1996) (stating C.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Relativism.Indb
    Richard Schantz, Markus Seidel The Problem of Relativism in the Sociology of (Scientific) Knowledge P h i l o s o p h i s c h e A n a l y s e P h i l o s o p h i c a l A n a l y s i s Herausgegeben von / Edited by Herbert Hochberg • Rafael Hüntelmann • Christian Kanzian Richard Schantz • Erwin Tegtmeier Band 43 / Volume 43 Richard Schantz, Markus Seidel The Problem of Relativism in the Sociology of (Scientific) Knowledge Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. North and South America by Transaction Books Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ 08854-8042 [email protected] United Kingdom, Ireland, Iceland, Turkey, Malta, Portugal by Gazelle Books Services Limited White Cross Mills Hightown LANCASTER, LA1 4XS [email protected] Livraison pour la France et la Belgique: Librairie Philosophique J.Vrin 6, place de la Sorbonne; F-75005 PARIS Tel. +33 (0)1 43 54 03 47; Fax +33 (0)1 43 54 48 18 www.vrin.fr 2011 ontos verlag P.O. Box 15 41, D-63133 Heusenstamm www.ontosverlag.com ISBN 978-3-86838-126-9 2011 No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in retrieval systems or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed
    [Show full text]
  • The American Philosophical Association PACIFIC DIVISION EIGHTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM
    The American Philosophical Association PACIFIC DIVISION EIGHTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM WESTIN GASLAMP QUARTER AND U.S. GRANT HOTEL SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 16 – 20, 2014 : new books for spring HUMOR AND THE GOOD LIFE REPRODUCTION, RACE, IN MODERN PHILOSOPHY AND GENDER IN PHILOSOPHY Shaftesbury, Hamann, Kierkegaard AND THE EARLY LIFE SCIENCES Lydia B. Amir Susanne Lettow, editor (February) (March) PHILOSOPHIZING AD INFINITUM LEO STRAUSS AND THE CRISIS infinite Nature, infinite Philosophy OF RATIONALISM Marcel Conche Another Reason, Another Enlightenment Laurent Ledoux and Corine Pelluchon Herman G. Bonne, translators Robert Howse, translator Foreword by J. Baird Callicott (February) (June) NIHILISM AND METAPHYSICS HABITATIONS OF THE VEIL The Third Voyage Metaphor and the Poetics of Black Being Vittorio Possenti in African American Literature Daniel B. Gallagher, translator Rebecka Rutledge Fisher Foreword by Brian Schroeder (May) (April) THE LAWS OF THE SPIRIT LACan’s etHics and nietzscHe’s A Hegelian Theory of Justice CRITIQUE OF PLATONISM Shannon Hoff Tim Themi (April) (May) AFTER LEO STRAUSS EMPLOTTING VIRTUE New Directions in Platonic A Narrative Approach Political Philosophy to Environmental Virtue Ethics Tucker Landy Brian Treanor (June) (June) LIVING ALTERITIES FEMINIST PHENOMENOLOGY Phenomenology, Embodiment, and Race AND MEDICINE Emily S. Lee, editor Kristin Zeiler and (April) Lisa Folkmarson Käll, editors (April) LUCE IRIGARAY’s PHenomenoLOGY OF FEMININE BEING Please visit our website for information Virpi Lehtinen on our philosophy journals. (June) SPECIAL EVENTS Only registrants are entitled to attend the reception on April 17 at no additional charge. Non-registrants, such as spouses, partners, or family members of meeting attendees, who wish to accompany a registrant to this reception must purchase a $10 guest ticket; guest tickets are available at the reception door as well as in advance at the registration desk.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lack of Historism: the Leftists' Experience
    The Lack of Historism: the Leftists’ Experience and its Contemporary Meaning Vlad Navitski, M. Phil., lecturer European Humanities University, Vilnius, Lithuania The article is devoted to the historical views of the different branches of the leftists in the last century and a half. But beyond this content a foundational – and constitutional for this paper – interest lies. I tend to show that theoretical stances of the leftists on history not only predetermined their own practice (and, surely were influenced by it), but also are exercised in the worldwide contemporary social and cultural trends, not related to the leftists practice at all. Among them globalization, practices of the multiculturalism/fundamentalism and identity politics should be mentioned in the first place. Key words: historicity, borders, transcendent order, subjectivity, modernity, temporality, technics Introduction In general, the peculiar imitation of the leftists’ practices – once specific for them – by the contemporary social trends was explicitly clarified by the leftists themselves (Gilles Dauvé)1 and by the more moderate researches (Jean Baudrillard). But, to my mind, in order to see what are the reasons or causes of such imitation we have to go further than just to identify this doubling with the cunning of the society of consumption, assuming even previously contradictory practices for its own sake (Baudrillard).2 Similarly, we shouldn’t stop on the mere statement of this doubling as the ridiculous parallelism (Dauvé). What we should here is to understand this imitation as the phenomenon bearing the constitutional meaning for the comprehension of the contemporary social and cultural trends. And this understanding, I believe, is – not only but mainly – possible, when we pay our attention to the leftists’ standpoints on time and history and their perturbation in the mentioned trends.
    [Show full text]
  • Absolute Relativity: Weimar Cinema and the Crisis of Historicism By
    Absolute Relativity: Weimar Cinema and the Crisis of Historicism by Nicholas Walter Baer A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Film and Media and the Designated Emphasis in Critical Theory in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Anton Kaes, Chair Professor Martin Jay Professor Linda Williams Fall 2015 Absolute Relativity: Weimar Cinema and the Crisis of Historicism © 2015 by Nicholas Walter Baer Abstract Absolute Relativity: Weimar Cinema and the Crisis of Historicism by Nicholas Walter Baer Doctor of Philosophy in Film and Media Designated Emphasis in Critical Theory University of California, Berkeley Professor Anton Kaes, Chair This dissertation intervenes in the extensive literature within Cinema and Media Studies on the relationship between film and history. Challenging apparatus theory of the 1970s, which had presumed a basic uniformity and historical continuity in cinematic style and spectatorship, the ‘historical turn’ of recent decades has prompted greater attention to transformations in technology and modes of sensory perception and experience. In my view, while film scholarship has subsequently emphasized the historicity of moving images, from their conditions of production to their contexts of reception, it has all too often left the very concept of history underexamined and insufficiently historicized. In my project, I propose a more reflexive model of historiography—one that acknowledges shifts in conceptions of time and history—as well as an approach to studying film in conjunction with historical-philosophical concerns. My project stages this intervention through a close examination of the ‘crisis of historicism,’ which was widely diagnosed by German-speaking intellectuals in the interwar period.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Durkheim
    Durkheim’s and Simmel’s reactions to antisemitism and their reflection in ANGOR UNIVERSITY their views on modern society Stoetzler, Marcel Antisemitismus im 19. Jahrhundert aus internationaler Perspektive DOI: 10.14220/9783737009775.83 PRIFYSGOL BANGOR / B Published: 22/05/2019 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Cyswllt i'r cyhoeddiad / Link to publication Dyfyniad o'r fersiwn a gyhoeddwyd / Citation for published version (APA): Stoetzler, M. (2019). Durkheim’s and Simmel’s reactions to antisemitism and their reflection in their views on modern society. In M. König, & O. Schultz (Eds.), Antisemitismus im 19. Jahrhundert aus internationaler Perspektive (pp. 83-102). (Schriften aus der Max Weber Stiftung; Vol. 1). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Unipress (Schriften aus der Max Weber Stiftung). https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737009775.83 Hawliau Cyffredinol / General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please
    [Show full text]