Project Staff

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Project Staff Project Staff Jay Sugnet, Portland Planning Bureau, Project Manager Jeanne Harrison, Portland Office of Transportation Arianne Sperry, Portland Planning Bureau Jean Senechal Biggs, Portland Office of Transportation Kathy Mulder, Portland Office of Transportation Teak Wall, Portland Office of Transportation Consultant Team Mia Birk, Alta Planning + Design, Project Manager Mike Tresidder, Alta Planning + Design David Parisi, Parisi Associates Ryan LeProwse, David Evans and Associates Amy Jones, David Evans and Associates Timothy Smith, SERA Architects Matthew Arnold, SERA Architects Bob Wise, Cogan Owens Cogan FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Portland Bureau of Planning 1900 SW 4th Avenue, Suite 4100 Portland, OR 97201-5350 503-823-7700 phone 503-823-7800 fax E-mail: [email protected] RE: Division Plan A digital copy of this document can be found at: www.portlandonline.com/planning This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. This TGM grant is financed in part by federal Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), local government and the State of Oregon funds. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect views or policies of the State of Oregon. Table of Contents A. Background History of East Portland and SE Division Street Planning and Policy Technical Memo Multi-modal Transportation and Urban Design Analysis B. Land Use Existing Land Use Inventory Land Use Alternatives Memo Zoning Posters C. Transportation Traffic Glossary Street Classifications (listed in Section B. Planning and Policy Technical Memo) Mode Split Table Transportation Alternatives Analysis 7 Corners Roundabout Analysis D. Public Involvement Declaration of Cooperation – May 8, 2003 Schedule of Meetings and Events Community Working Group – Purpose, Responsibilities, and Relationships Neighborhood Walk Report October January Workshop Flyer January Workshop Summary April Workshop Flyer April Workshop Summary April Workshop Posters June Workshop Flyer June Workshop Summary June Workshop Posters A. Background The Background section contains the following documents: History of East Portland and SE Division Street This is the story of Division since the mid 1880’s and how forces have shaped Division into the street it is today. Factors that induced these changes include: the enormous growth of Portland’s population from the 1850s through 1910; changing zoning policies over time; the effects of the automobile era of the 1950s and 60s; the controversy of the Mt Hood Freeway; and traffic calming along parallel routes in the late 1980s. Planning and Policy Technical Memo This extensive memo is an inventory and review of public policies, plans, and studies relevant to the Division study area. This was completed early in the project to help document the policy framework that guided the plan. Included are descriptions of state, regional and city policies, as well as street classifications and zoning characterizations. Multi-modal Transportation and Urban Design Analysis This analysis outlines the existing conditions along Division related to multi-modal transportation issues and urban design. Timeline: Population of the City History of East Portland and SE Division Street of Portland* The story of the Division Green Street Main Street Project area is one of ongoing, rapid change and upheaval. It begins in the mid-1800s when the first settlers were gifted large Land Donation Claims east of the Willamette River, and soon moves into the approximately 60-year span when these farms were all subdivided into neighborhoods. The next changes occurred during the years of rail and streetcar expansion and decline, and continued on through the two World Wars. The subsequent popularity of the automobile in the 1950s promoted intense suburban growth on the eastside of the Willamette River, as well as significant freeway and highway expansion. In the 1970s there was a heated controversy over plans for a “Mt. Hood Freeway” which, had it not been defeated, would have replaced SE Division, Clinton, and Lincoln streets entirely. The defeat of the Mt Hood Freeway led to many changes in the way Portland looked at transportation planning and how to manage traffic and ensure livability in a growing city. In the 1980s The City of Portland devised a plan for revitalizing SE Portland, including several Traffic Calming measures on streets parallel to Division. This story begins with the creation of the City of Portland: Portland, OR was created in 1845 when Asa Lovejoy and F.W. Pettygrove decided to lay out a townsite and draw up an informal plat of 16 square blocks containing 50 by 100 foot lots on the west bank of the Willamette River. They flipped a coin and Pettygrove won the right to name it “Portland,” after Portland, Maine. The City was officially incorporated in 1851 and included a much larger area than the original 16 blocks.1 Portland began its early development as a trading and shipping town and the City’s 1850 economic growth soared in 1849, as the California Gold Rush demanded large quantities Population: of timber and foodstuffs from the area. To keep up with demand, logging in the 1850s 821 resulted in large cleared areas surrounding Portland and East Portland, thus the nickname “Stumptown.” The timber was shipped out of Portland as a major export and used locally for building construction. A secondary town named East Portland took form on the east side of the Willamette River in the 1850s, incorporating as a separate city in 1870. To the right is a picture from East Portland in 1874: *(www.portla ndonline.com, East Portland, 1874, looking southwest from the “Historical approximate present-day location of Hawthorne Timeline”) Boulevard, Oregon Historical Society, Negative # OrHi 8292 1 Snyder, Eugene E. Portland Names and Neighborhoods: Their Historic Origins, pg 16, Binford and Mort Pubs, December 1, 1979. 1 In 1850 the area was made up of large farms, with only a few streets connecting them. Several different (subsequently prominent) families acquired East Portland Land Donation Claim farms after 1850, when the Land Donation Act went into effect. The section of an 1852 survey map to the right shows some of these claims (i.e., Clinton Kelly and Seldon Murray). In addition, the Ladds, Stephens’, Waverleighs, Lincoln Kelly and a few others all owned land in East Portland and their farms contributed to Oregon’s export economy. When John B. Preston completed the Willamette Survey in 1851-1853 (soon after Survey Map, 1852. Oregon/Washington Bureau of Portland officially became a city), some of his Land Management, 1851-52 Cadastral Survey Map. survey lines were chosen to become major street alignments. Division Street, originally known as “Section Line Road” (from 1870 to 1882), was named for a survey section line (see survey map above, the Division Street section line is just below “Seldon Murray’s” Claim). The name was changed from Section Line Road to Division Street in 1882, apparently because it was too difficult to write as an address2. The map below, also from 1852, shows alignments for historic roads that follow nearly the same alignments as many contemporary ones (Sandy Boulevard, and SE Foster Road, for example). Historic Portland Roads and Topographical Map, Oregon/Washington Bureau of Land Management, 1851-52. 2 Ibid. 2 1860 In 1868, the Oregon Central Railroad broke ground at the east end of Division Street for Population: an eastside rail line to the south. By 1883, East Portland had become the western 2,874 terminus of the Northern Pacific Railroad and boasted a population of 30,000. Bridge construction across the Willamette River began in 1887, both to alleviate ferry traffic 1870 Population: capacity problems, and to facilitate eastside housing opportunities for westside workers. 8,293 As a result of the above factors, astonishingly rapid growth occurred in East Portland 1880 between the mid-1800s and just past the turn of the century. Portland and East Portland Population: united as one city in 1891. “Streets in both East Portland and Albina, as in Portland, were 17,577 laid out on the “Philadelphia pattern,” numbers paralleling the river and named streets 1890 running east-to-west. But many of the names were repeated in those two cities and also Population: in Portland on the West Side.” This problem was later corrected in the “Great 46,385 Renaming” when the city replaced duplicate street names with unique ones3. 1900 By 1910, only approximately 60-years from the time the first settlers claimed land in East Population: 90,426 Portland, nearly all of the Land Donation farms had been subdivided 1910 and developed into the Population: neighborhoods and street alignments 207,214 we see today. Interestingly, the families on the south side of Division Street subdivided their land into “additions” (Waverleigh’s Addition, th etc.) before the families on the north A horse drinks from a trough at SE 60 and Division in 1910. (City of Portland, Stanley Parr Office of side (Ladd’s Addition, etc.), which Archives and Records, 1910 c_60th Ave & Division St may be the reason for the odd [72]_5411-02 b39 f22) alignment of many of the north-south streets crossing Division. Others speculate this mismatch is due to a survey mistake. In 1915, the cities of St Johns and Linnton merged with Portland and the population of the resulting city was estimated at around 233,000. However, “the great increase in population from 1891 to 1915 was not due primarily to annexations or mergers—the 1920 areas taken into Portland were not densely populated—but to the immense immigration Population: 4 258,288 from the East.” Zoning In the early 1900s, the City of Portland regulated development and the location of certain land uses, but did not categorize uses into zones and did not have a map showing where uses were allowed by right.
Recommended publications
  • District Background
    DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • Past Projects Capital and Maintenance Projects
    Past Projects Capital and Maintenance Projects Baseball Diamond Renovations Project completed in 2015: Repaired baseball fields in Fernhill, Glenhaven and Pier Parks. Thank you to Friends of Baseball for major support. Bill Naito Legacy Fountain completed in 2009: Completion of the Bill Naito Legacy Fountain. Thank you to the Naito Family for major funding. Climbing Walls completed in 2014: Installed 6 permanent bouldering walls in East Portland, Southwest, Mt. Scott, St. Johns, Hillside and University Park Community Centers, and purchased 2 mobile climbing walls. Colonel Summers Project completed in 2014: Built a futsol court in collaboration with Operation Pitch Invasion. Thank you to the Portland Timbers for major funding. Couch Park Project completed in 2011: Added play equipment, soft playground surfacing, and handicapped access for children with disabilities. Dawson Park Project completed in 2013: Built an interactive water feature as part of the historical park renovation. Thank you to the Legacy Emmanuel for major funding. Director Park completed in 2010: Built Director Park and Teachers Fountain in downtown Portland. Thank you to Jordan Schnitzer and Tom Moyer for major funding. Grant Park Project completed in 2008: Repaired irrigation system in Grant Park. Holly Farm Park Project completed in 2007: Built Holly Farm Park in collaboration with the Trust for Public Land and Oregon State Parks. Thank you to the Joyce N Furman Memorial Trust for major funding. Hoyt Arboretum Project completed in 2012: Installed interpretive and way-finding signage in Hoyt Arboretum. Thank you to the Joyce N Furman Memorial Trust for major funding. Lownsdale and Chapman Squares Project completed in 2013: Restored historic downtown squares.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2018-19 Requested Budget
    Portland Bureau of Transportation FY 2018-19 Requested Budget TABLE OF CONTENTS Commissioner’s Transmittal Letter Bureau Budget Advisory Committee (BBAC) Report Portland Bureau of Transportation Organization Chart Bureau Summary Capital Budget Programs Administration and Support Capital Improvements Maintenance Operations Performance Measures Summary of Bureau Budget CIP Summary FTE Summary Appendix Fund Summaries Capital Improvement Plan Summaries Decision Package Summary Transportation Operating Fund Financial Forecast Parking Facilities Fund Financial Forecast Budget Equity Assessment Tool FY 2018-19 to FY 2022-23 CIP List Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Dear Transportation Commissioner Saltzman, Mayor Wheeler, and Commissioners Eudaly, Fish, and Fritz: The PBOT Budget/Bureau Advisory Committee (BBAC) is a collection of individuals representing a range of interests impacted by transportation decisions, including neighborhoods, businesses, labor, bicyclists and pedestrians, and traditionally underserved communities. We serve on the BBAC as volunteers who have our city’s best interests in mind. With helpful support from the Director and her staff, we have spent many hours over the last five months reviewing the Bureau’s obligations and deliberating over its budget and strategy priorities. Together we have arrived at the following recommendations. Investment Strategy: The Bureau’s proposed Investment Strategy prioritizes funding projects that address three primary concerns: maintaining existing assets, managing for growth, and advancing safety. Underlying the selection and evaluation process is the Bureau’s laudable focus on equity. We support the adoption of this “triple-win” strategy. We are pleased to see safety and equity as top priorities of the Director and her staff. The City has been allocated transportation funding as a result of the Oregon Legislature passing the historic Oregon Transportation Package in House Bill 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland City Council Agenda
    CITY OF OFFICIAL PORTLAND, OREGON MINUTES A REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON WAS HELD THIS 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015 AT 9:30 A.M. THOSE PRESENT WERE: Mayor Hales, Presiding; Commissioners Fish, Fritz, Novick and Saltzman, 5. Commissioner Saltzman arrived at 9:33 a.m. OFFICERS IN ATTENDANCE: Karla Moore-Love, Clerk of the Council; Linly Rees, Deputy City Attorney; and Jim Wood, Sergeant at Arms. Item Nos. 130 and 132 were pulled for discussion and on a Y-5 roll call, the balance of the Consent Agenda was adopted. Disposition: COMMUNICATIONS 124 Request of Ibrahim Mubarak to address Council regarding houseless issues (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 125 Request of Mary Ann Schwab to address Council regarding Mt. Tabor Reservoir disconnect public involvement processes (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 126 Request of David Kif Davis to address Council regarding police targeting of journalists and photo journalists during Ferguson Solidarity March (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 127 Request of Joe Walsh to address Council regarding scheduling a communication (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 128 Request of Michael Withey to address Council regarding update on micro communities, Accessory Dwelling Units and tiny houses (Communication) PLACED ON FILE TIMES CERTAIN 129 TIME CERTAIN: 9:30 AM – Proclaim the month of February 2015 to be Black History Month in Portland (Proclamation introduced by Mayor Hales) 15 minutes requested PLACED ON FILE CONSENT AGENDA – NO DISCUSSION 1 of 147 February 4, 2015 130 Authorize City Attorney to seek and appeal a limited judgment in Anderson v. City of Portland, Multnomah Circuit Court No.
    [Show full text]
  • STUDY AREA AMENITIES NAITO MADISON 14TH    Inner Southeast Portland MADISON 13TH
    MAIN HAWTHORNE Legend STUDY AREA AMENITIES NAITO MADISON 14TH inner southeast portland MADISON 13TH 15TH 17TH N 18TH 19TH 20TH urban design 16TH HAWTHORNE Commercial/Retail Eastside Streetcar (2012) 22ND 2ND This section of Inner Southeast Portland 3RD 7TH 10TH CLAY 11TH encompasses a broad mix of uses, transportation 16TH corridors, and geographic contexts. Along the MAPLE HOLLY Willamette riverfront runs a section of the GRAND I5 MARKET Eastbank Esplanade PCC Training Center Eastbank Esplanade multi-use trail, docks for ELLIOTT MARKET POPLARrecreational and commercial boaters, OMSI’s MILL MARTIN LUTHER KING JR HAZELsubmarine pier, and heavy industrial use at the Ross Island Sand & Gravel terminal. Commercial MULBERRY PALM Goodwill Industries uses near Hawthorne comprise numerous STEPHENS wholesalers of constructionSTEPHENS and 22ND home- finisheing goods. Further into the heart of the 16TH LOCUST district, construction suppliers, Northwest HARRISON Natrual Gas, and DariGold all21ST maintain large Realigned MLK Viaduct (2011) HARRISON facilities. Residential uses are non-existent and 12TH HARRISON HARRISON 5 OMSI LARCH retail is only present along small stretches of SE HALL LINCOLN Oregon Rail Heritage Foundation 12th Ave andHEMLOCK Woodward/Powell. OMSI and Portland Opera WATER Development (future) CYPRESS Development (future) LINCOLN RIVER 20TH DIVISION GRANT 16TH Portland Opera GRANT BIRCH SHERMAN SPRUCE LADD LAVENDER OMSI Station (2015) TAMARACK SHERMAN OHSU Schnitzer Campus (future) CARUTHERS CARUTHERS
    [Show full text]
  • Requested Budget Fiscal Year 2014-15
    South Park Blocks, 1910 REQUESTED BUDGET Fiscal Year 2014-15 South Park Blocks, 2013 Portland Parks & Recreation FY 2014-15 Requested Budget Finance Department Jeff Shaffer, Finance Manager The Portland Parks & Recreation FY 2014-15 Requested Budget is a complex and enormous project which takes many disciplines throughout the bureau, as well as critical public input. I personally want to thank the following people who contributed throughout this budget process toward the development of this budget. Budget Advisory Committee Communications Team Portland Parks Board Members Margaret Evans Joan Hallquist Andy Nelson, Parks Board Chair Warren Jimenez Mike Alexander Elizabeth Kennedy-Wong Judy Bluehorse Skelton Colleen Keyes Mary Anne Cassin Jeff Shaffer Kathy Fong Stevens Jennifer Yocom Nick Hardigg (member ex-officio) Dion Jordan BRASS Team Jim Owens Dennis Choquette - Lead Meryl Redisch (member ex-officio) Bryan Aptekar Linda Robinson Karen Birt Shelli Romero Doug Brenner Bob Sallinger Kim Calame Christa Thoeresz Kristine Canham Sue Van Brocklin Terri Davis Mauricio Villarreal Gregory Dubay Labor Partners Josh Green Scott Gibson (PP&R Park Services) - DCTU Tim Hammock Tim Haberman (PP&R Recreation) - Local 483 Abbe MacFarlane Gerry Verhoef (PP&R Engineering) – COPPEA Amie Massier Heather McKillip Coalition/Community Representatives Jeff Milkes Angela Moos, North Portland Neighborhood Services Sally Noble Amy Lewin, Southeast Uplift Neighborhood Office Robi Potter Brenda McSweeney, East Portland Neighborhood Office Kym Randolph Carol Chesarek, Neighbors West/Northwest Shawn Rogers Joshua Shirley, Central Northeast Neighbors Nancy Roth Paul Anthony, Northeast Coalition of Neighbors Jamie Sandness Phil Kalberer, Downtown Business Community Devra Staneart Sokho Eath, IRCO/Asian Family Center Craig Vanderbout Steve Mullinax, Southwest Neighbors Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDX Celebrate It’S Two Year Anniversary on June 7 at 6:30 Pm
    Our Where’s Growing Early 28th Ave. Q Revolution Newspaper Year Page 14 Page 8 Page 3 JUNE SOUTHEAST EXAMINER 2017 southeastexaminer.com “Your Neighborhood News Source” Vol 28 No 6 Portland, OR Infill on Steroids Gains State Traction: Riles Residents BY MIDGE PIERCE and old. But opponents say the Oregon A bill known as a “Build Baby Build” Home Builders Association (OHBA) legislative bill under the idea of addressing and others twisted it into a bill that over- emergency housing statewide is fueling rides local zoning and undermines city what critics call a widespread assault controls. The bill would allow building to on Oregon cities’ self-determination maximum density and heights potentially and livability. Adding insult, the bill is disregarding critical local planning tools barreling through the state legislature like discretionary design reviews. without adequate public hearing. As outrage mounted last month at House Bill 2007 would essentially an informational meeting in Salem, House Overview of the proposed cascading soaking pools between reservoirs 5 and 6. eliminate single family residential Speaker Tina Kotek slammed opponents as Designed by Jennifer Moran neighborhoods by making multi-plex infill racist NIMBYS. Arriving late to advocate housing mandatory across the state. The for the “high-yield” housing bill she Mt. Tabor Park Thermal Baths bill would permit duplexes and ADUs sponsored, she condemned “race-based everywhere in cities and towns of at least housing policies” and said opposition is An Idea for Preserving the Reservoirs, Creating 2500 residents. “grounded in Nimbyism” by well-heeled Energy, and Raising Revenue Critics call it a stealth bill that is residents using discriminatory practices Infill inflation modeled after Portland’s that restrict others from building wealth BY AMY PETERSON PSU SCHOOL OF ARCHI- in 2006, the city cannot use the open controversial Residential Infill Project and power.
    [Show full text]
  • RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Operational Feasibility Study: Task 2
    RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Operational Feasibility Study: Task 2 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 A. PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 1 A. PLANNING ................................................................................................................................. 1 B. CONDUCT OF RECONNAISSANCE ........................................................................................... 1 C. MERGING DATA ........................................................................................................................ 2 III. OBSERVATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 2 A. ROUTE ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................................. 2 1. ROUTE DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 2 2. GENERAL .............................................................................................................................. 4 3. BY ROUTE LEG ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ross Island Bridge Rehabilitation Project Frequently Asked Questions
    Ross Island Bridge Rehabilitation Project Frequently Asked Questions What does the project involve? Starting in October 2014, contractors will remove about 250 deteriorating rivets and upgrade the steels members. This first phase will take six to eight weeks to complete. In the spring of 2015, crews will begin preparations to paint the bridge. This involves stripping old paint down to the bare steel, treating the bare steel for rust and then applying the new paint. Why paint the Ross Island Bridge? The paint on the U.S. 26 Willamette River Bridge (Ross Island Bridge) has deteriorated and no longer provides the necessary corrosion protection and aesthetic appearance. The bridge was last painted in 1967. This work will preserve its structural integrity and help extend its useful life. Why do the rivets need to be removed? Many of the rivets haven’t been replaced since the bridge opened in 1926 and are being removed because of rust and corrosion. Removing and replacing the rivets will help strengthen the bridge, preserve its structural stability and extend its service life. What’s the schedule? Rivet removal will take place in the fall of 2014 and will require six to eight weeks to complete. The painting will take place in the dry season, spring to fall, in 2015, 2016 and 2017. The project is scheduled for completion in late 2017, although the schedule is subject to change due to weather and site conditions. What are the work hours? The rivet work will occur during the day between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Make Way for the Orange Line and a Milwaukian Renaissance
    Portland State University PDXScholar Metroscape Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies Summer 2015 Make Way for the Orange Line and a Milwaukian Renaissance Ben Maras Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/metroscape Part of the Transportation Commons, and the Urban Studies Commons Recommended Citation Maras, Ben (2015). "Make Way for the Orange Line and a Milwaukian Renaissance" Summer 2015 Metroscape, p. 6-12. This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Metroscape by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Make Way for the Orange Line and a Milwaukian Renaissance by Ben Maras ilwaukie is undergoing major ther — appears poised to make a major changes: a new light rail line, a entrance into metro-area society. Mnew 8.5-acre waterfront park, “I believe the opening of the Orange a new two-mile neighborhood greenway, Line will be the beginning of a renais- two new bike trails, and increasing public sance for Milwaukie's downtown,” Wilda and private investment in its downtown. Parks, who served as Interim Mayor of Now, the former riverboat town and Milwaukie earlier this year, said. more recently, sleepy suburb of 20,000- Although the largest project by far is odd people — only six miles from down- the new MAX Orange Line, opening town Portland but qualitatively much far- September 12th, a number of smaller Page 6 Metroscape Milwaukie City Center Harrison investments have already begun to make significant impacts on the city.
    [Show full text]
  • MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of Trimet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY
    MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of TriMet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY 50 YEARS OF TRIMET AND TRANSIT IN THE PORTLAND REGION CONTENTS Foreword: 50 Years of Transit Creating Livable Communities . 1 Setting the Stage for Doing Things Differently . 2 Portland, Oregon’s Legacy of Transit . 4 Beginnings ............................................................................4 Twentieth Century .....................................................................6 Transit’s Decline. 8 Bucking National Trends in the Dynamic 1970s . 11 New Institutions for a New Vision .......................................................12 TriMet Is Born .........................................................................14 Shifting Gears .........................................................................17 The Freeway Revolt ....................................................................18 Sidebar: The TriMet and City of Portland Partnership .......................................19 TriMet Turbulence .....................................................................22 Setting a Course . 24 Capital Program ......................................................................25 Sidebar: TriMet Early Years and the Mount Hood Freeway ...................................29 The Banfield Project ...................................................................30 Sidebar: The Transportation Managers Advisory Committee ................................34 Sidebar: Return to Sender ..............................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • OCTOBER 2020 Legalizing Psilocybin Library Seeks Levy for New Building and Expansions by Jack Rubinger
    SOUTHEAST EXAMINER Your Neighborhood News Source October 2020 Created and Powered by the Love of Community southeastexaminer.com Our 31st Year Vol 31 No 10 Portland, OR Police Oversight Measure on Ballot BY DON MACGILLIVRAY A plea for police accountability has came the first Black woman to be elected been the root cause of the nightly unrest in to the Portland City Council. As a longtime the streets of Portland. Demonstrators want community organizer and former state police reform so that people of color and lawmaker, her paramount priority has been disadvantaged citizens are treated appro- a reform of the Portland Police Bureau priately and with respect. (PPB). Safety from police coercion and mis- Commissioner Hardesty and Mayor conduct requires an accountable indepen- Wheeler have had a problematic relation- dent, citizen empowered police oversight ship over police matters, but last spring to- system. Even though Portland has strug- gether they agreed to reduce the Portland gled for two generations to create a satis- Police budget by $15 million. factory system of oversight, this remains a On September 2, three volunteer work in progress. members of the Citizen Review Com- The organizations working for police mittee (CRC), the city’s 11-person police reform want to limit the size and scope of oversight board, resigned because Port- our police force, reinvest in our communi- land’s system of police accountability is ties, find alternatives to policing and re- inadequate. Equalizing the Future: Measure 26-214 duce punishments for non-violent offenses. This June, the Independent Police In July, Portland City Council unani- Review (IPR) division received more mously voted to put a City Charter amend- than 600 complaints about police conduct BY NANCY TANNLER ment, Measure 26-217, on the November and more complaints continue to flood in 3 ballot.
    [Show full text]