DOCSLIB.ORG

65 Towards a Climate-Resilient Jakarta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

65 65 65 Österreichische Forschungsstiftung für Internationale Entwicklung Towards a Climate-Resilient Jakarta: Die 1967 gegründete ÖFSE bietet seit Oktober 2009 ihre Dienstleistungen An Analysis of the Resilience Thinking im C3 – Centrum für Internationale Entwicklung an. Sie steht für: Bibliothek, Information & Dokumentation Behind Jakarta’s Current Public Policy Wissenschaft & Forschung (Politik-)Beratung Wissenschaftliche Publikationen Approach to Climate-Related Hazards Veranstaltungen zu aktuellen Themen Veranstaltungsräume im C3 T +43 1 3174010 F -150 E [email protected] Jakob Haushofer A 1090 Wien, Sensengasse 3 I www.oefse.at, www.centrum3.at Master Thesis 65 Towards a Climate-Resilient Jakarta: An Analysis of the Resilience Thinking Behind Jakarta’s Current Public Policy Approach to Climate-Related Hazards Jakob Haushofer Master Thesis Mai 2018 1. Auflage 2018 © Österreichische Forschungsstiftung für Internationale Entwicklung (ÖFSE) im C3 – Centrum für Internationale Entwicklung A-1090 Wien, Sensengasse 3, Telefon: (+43 1) 317 40 10, Fax: (+43 1) 317 40 10 – 150 e-mail: [email protected], Internet: http://www.oefse.at, http://www.centrum3.at Für den Inhalt verantwortlich: Jakob Haushofer Druck: druck.at Südwind-Verlag ISBN: 978-3-902906-25-0 Bibliografische Information Der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.ddb.de abrufbar. Preface Climate change presents undoubtedly one of the greatest contemporary threats both for the planet and for humankind. Climate change adaptation is therefore a challenge that with good reason was included in the Agenda 2030 of the United Nations. SDG 13 stipulates to take urgent action to combat climate change and its im- pacts, in particular by strengthening resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters in all countries. SDG 11 calls for governments and public authorities to make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustain- able, and in particular “by 2030, to significantly reduce the number of deaths and the number of people affected […] by disasters, including water-related disasters, with a focus on protecting the poor and people in vulnerable situations”. Against this background, research which aims at enhancing our understanding of how to improve the climate resilience of megacities and coastal urban agglomerations is highly topical and of particular relevance to both climate action and development coop- eration. The master thesis by Mr. Jakob Haushofer provides a thorough and empirically grounded analysis of climate resilience policies in Jakarta. As such, it does not only en- hance our understanding of a specific conception of resilience policies in a megacity of South-East Asia, but provides important general lessons on the challenges for climate resilience policies in large urban agglomerations both in the Global South and North. Werner Raza ÖFSE Director Master of Science Thesis Socio-Ecological Economics and Policy Towards a Climate-Resilient Jakarta: An Analysis of the Resilience Thinking Behind Jakarta’s Current Public Policy Approach to Climate-Related Hazards by: Jakob Haushofer Vienna University of Business and Economics (WU), Austria Institute for Ecological Economics Written in course of an exchange semester at Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Supervisor: Reinhard Mechler, WU / IIASA [email protected] September 2015 Content List of tables............................................................................................................................ III List of figures .......................................................................................................................... III List of acronyms ..................................................................................................................... IV Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. V 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 Research methodology and design: exploratory case study ......................................... 5 2.1 Policy document analysis ..................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Theme-structured expert interviews and thematic interview data analysis ................... 7 3 Two prominent approaches to urban resilience .......................................................... 11 3.1 Resilience as a flexible metaphor and concept – steady versus complex systems ......... 11 3.2 Distinct approaches to urban resilience by different research traditions ..................... 13 3.3 Urban social-ecological systems approach and complex adaptive systems thinking ... 15 3.3.1 Social-ecological systems ................................................................................................ 15 3.3.2 Complex adaptive systems thinking ................................................................................ 16 3.3.3 Social-ecological resilience .............................................................................................. 18 3.3.4 Urban social-ecological systems resilience ...................................................................... 21 3.3.5 Shortcoming of social-ecological systems theory ............................................................ 29 3.4 Urban disaster resilience approach and disaster risk management .............................. 30 3.4.1 Disaster risk management ................................................................................................ 31 3.4.2 Urban disaster resilience .................................................................................................. 32 3.4.3 Shortcomings of disaster resilience theory ...................................................................... 38 3.5 Going beyond distinct approaches: a great deal of complementary insights ............... 40 4 Urban climate resilience ................................................................................................ 42 4.1 Resilience of urban systems to climate-related hazards in times of climate change .... 42 4.2 Urban disaster risk management as climate change adaptation ................................... 44 4.3 An interdisciplinary complex adaptive systems approach to urban climate resilience 45 5 Policy implications of different understandings of resilience .................................... 47 5.1 What is public policy? ........................................................................................................ 47 5.2 Policy implications of different resilience perspectives and conceptualisations ........... 48 6 The system under concern: Jakarta megacity ............................................................. 52 6.1 Climate related hazards in Jakarta .................................................................................. 53 6.2 Multilevel policy addressing climate-related hazards in Jakarta .................................. 57 7 Resilience thinking behind Jakarta’s current policy approach to climate-related hazards .................................................................................................................................... 63 7.1 The current policy approach to climate-related hazards – an overview ....................... 63 7.1.1 Structural policies ............................................................................................................ 63 7.1.2 Non-structural policies ..................................................................................................... 65 7.2 Resilience thinking in policy documents analysed ........................................................... 67 7.3 Understanding of resilience by public policy actors interviewed ................................... 68 7.3.1 Directorate General for Climate Change (DGCC) of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (KLHK) ........................................................................................................................... 68 7.3.2 National Agency for Disaster Risk Management (BNPB) .............................................. 70 7.3.3 Provincial Planning and Development Agency (BAPPEDA) ......................................... 71 7.3.4 Commission for Environment and Development (CED) of the Regional Research Council of Jakarta (DRD) ............................................................................................................. 73 7.3.5 Overview of resilience definitions by public actors interviewed ..................................... 75 I 8 Analysis of Jakarta’s resilience thinking from a complex adaptive systems perspective .............................................................................................................................. 77 8.1 Varying resilience perspectives – all leaning towards engineering resilience ............... 77 8.1.1 Case-by-case analysis of the policy actors’ resilience perspectives ................................ 77 8.1.2 Overall analysis of the city’s resilience perspective – engineering resilience ................. 79 8.2 Concern for a wide range of factors for climate resilience with infrastructure in focus ...................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • 1 Urban Risk Assessment Jakarta, Indonesia Map City

    1 Urban Risk Assessment Jakarta, Indonesia Map City

    CITY SNAPSHOT URBAN RISK ASSESSMENT (From Global City Indicators) JAKARTA, INDONESIA Total City Population in yr: 9.6 million in 2010 MAP Population Growth (% annual): 2.6% Land Area (Km2): 651 Km2 Population density (per Km2): 14,465 Country's per capita GDP (US$): $2329 % of country's pop: 4% Total number of households (based on registered Kartu Keluarga): 2,325,973 Administrative map of Jakarta1 Dwelling density (per Km2): N.A. CITY PROFILE GRDP (US$) 10,222 Jakarta is located on the north coast of the island of Java in the Indonesian archipelago in Southeast Asia. It is the country’s largest city and the political and economic hub of % of Country's GDP: 20% Indonesia. The city’s built environment is characterized physically by numerous skyscrapers, concentrated in the central business district but also built ad hoc throughout the city, especially in the past 20 years. The rest of Jakarta generally comprises low‐lying, Total Budget (US$) $3.1 Billion densely populated neighborhoods, which are highly diverse in terms of income levels and uses, and many of these neighborhoods are home to varied informal economic activities. The population of Jakarta is considered wealthy relative to neighboring provinces and Date of last Urban Master Plan: 2010 1 Source: DKI Jakarta 1 other islands, and indeed its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita is more than four times the national average. Jakarta is located in a deltaic plain crisscrossed by 13 natural rivers and more than 1,400 kilometers of man‐ made waterways. About 40% of the city, mainly the area furthest north near the Java Sea, is below sea level.
  • Jakarta and Can

    Jakarta and Can

    Public Disclosure Authorized Building Urban Resilience MANAGING THE RISKS OF DISASTERS IN EAST ASIA AND THE PACIFIC Public Disclosure Authorized Tools for Building Urban Resilience: Integrating Risk Information into Investment Decisions Pilot Cities Report – Jakarta and Can Tho Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Tools for Building Urban Resilience: Integrating Risk Information into Investment Decisions Pilot Cities Report – Jakarta and Can Tho Tools for Building Urban Resilience: Integrating Risk Information into Investment Decisions Pilot Cities Report – Jakarta and Can Tho ©2012 The World Bank The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development The World Bank Group 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433, USA May 2012 Disclaimer: This report is a product of the staff of the World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessar- ily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent, or those of the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID). The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgments on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or accep- tance of such boundaries. Acknowledgements About Building Urban his report was prepared by a team led by Abhas Jha and com- Resilience in East Asia prised of Abigail Baca, Andre A. Bald, Arlan Rahman, Dzung THuy Nguyen, Fook Chuan Eng, Iwan Gunawan, Meskerem uilding Urban Resilience in East Asia is a World Bank program Brhane and Zuzana Svetlosakova.
  • Indonesia: Floods and Landslides; Information Bulletin No

    Indonesia: Floods and Landslides; Information Bulletin No

    Indonesia: Floods and Information bulletin n° 2 5 January 2008 Landslides This bulletin is being issued for information only. Torrential rain in Indonesia has caused flooding and landslides in many areas, the most affected being Central Java and East Java. In the two provinces, up to 12,000 houses have been destroyed or damaged with more than 80 lives lost, 24 people reported injured and more than 50 reported missing. At the same time, the capital city Jakarta is also experiencing its seasonal plight, particularly affecting residents along the banks of the Ciliwung river. In response to the flooding and landslides, the Indonesian Red Cross (Palang Merah Indonesia/PMI) are carrying out evacuation operations, distribution of relief items, field kitchen operations, clean water and health services. <click here to view the map of the affected area, or here for detailed contact information> The Situation The flooding, caused by heavy rains in many parts of Indonesia since the last week of December 2007, continues to affect the community, particularly in Central Java and East Java and also in the capital city of Jakarta. Preliminary assessment carried out by the Indonesian Red Cross (Palang Merah Indonesia/PMI) has identified urgent needs for its operation as well as relief needs for the affected communities. The community needs identified so far include food items, health services, hygiene kits, family kits, tents and tarpaulins. The district coordination unit for disaster management (Satlak PB) of Karang Anyar, together with the local government, has assessed the location of floods and landslides, and set up emergency posts as well as field kitchens in the affected areas.
  • Floods in North Sumatera, West Java, Bengkulu and DKI Jakarta Provinces

    Floods in North Sumatera, West Java, Bengkulu and DKI Jakarta Provinces

    Information bulletin Indonesia: Floods in North Sumatera, West Java, Bengkulu and DKI Jakarta provinces Glide n° FL-2019-000182-IDN Date of issue: 2 January 2020 Date of disaster: 28 December 2019 – now Point of contact: Arifin M. Hadi, PMI Head of Disaster Management Heather Fehr, IFRC Disaster Risk Management Delegate Operation start date: 28 December 2019 Category of disaster: Yellow Host National Society: Indonesian Red Cross (Palang Merah Indonesia) Number of people affected: approximately Number of people to be assisted: TBC (assessment is 10,000,000 affected, 31,232 IDP and 16 deaths ongoing) This bulletin is issued for information only and reflects the current situation and details available at this time. The Indonesian Red Cross – Palang Merah Indonesia (PMI), with the support of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), are continuing to monitor and respond to the situation with local and national resources. If required, additional financial resources will be sought via the relevant IFRC international disaster response mechanism. The situation Torrential rainfall from Tuesday, 31 December 2019, until Wednesday, 1 January 2020 morning triggered floods in Jakarta (all five municipalities: North, West, East, Central and South), West Java (districts of West Bandung, Karawang, Bogor, Bekasi and Bekasi City) and Banten Province (district of Lebak, South Tangerang, and Tangerang City). The Indonesian National Board for Disaster Management, locally known as Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana (BNPB), reported that the flooding spots has reached 268, while in Jakarta alone 158 flooding spots are identified. The most affected area in Jakarta is East Jakarta with 65 flood spots.
  • Flood Management Model in Digital Era, Using SAST

    Flood Management Model in Digital Era, Using SAST

    1 2 3 Flood Management Model In Digital Era, Using SAST (Strtategic 4 Assumption Surfacing and Testing) and the Exponential Comparison 5 Method (ECM) : A Case Study in Jakarta 6 7 Abstract 8 Flooding is an annual disaster in Jakarta, the capital of Indonesia especially 9 in December to February. Geographical position of Jakarta which is 40% below sea 10 level, causes flooding not only from rain, but also from rob due to rising sea levels. In 11 the last 5 years the impact of flood more and more serious, not only economic losses, 12 but also human victims. 13 This study aims to determine the right strategy of flood mitigation by public 14 involving in the digital era. The method used is combination of experts based . 15 representing BNPB (National Disaster Agency), Local Goverment, Academics, 16 Community Leaders, Businessman, and Practitioners; and vulnerable field research . 17 Data analysis uses the ECM (Exponential Comparison Method) and SAST (Strategic 18 Assumption Surfacing and Testing). 19 The result of the study indicates that the most appropriate strategy to mitigate 20 flood disaster is establishment “Disaster Information Center” and "Disaster alert 21 groups” involving every community element. Utilizing social media especially 22 WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram are very helpful way to share information of 23 flood, how to prepare and emergency action to reduce losses and human victims. 24 25 26 Keywords: Flood, Mitigation, Disaster management, Digital Community 27 28 Introduction 29 Jakarta faces a very devastating routine flood almost every year. The height of 30 the water flooding Jakarta in the last 5 years (2013-2017) has reached 2-4 meters, 31 with a length of time between 4-8 days.
  • Flood Risk Modeling in Jakarta Development and Usefulness in a Time of Climate Change

    Flood Risk Modeling in Jakarta Development and Usefulness in a Time of Climate Change

    1 Flood risk modeling in Jakarta development and usefulness in a time of climate change Yus Budiyono i to my mom who sent me to school and my dad who taught me to survive ii Thesis Committee: Promotors: prof. dr. J.C.J.H. Aerts dr. P.J. Ward Co-promotor: prof. dr. M.A. Marfai Reading Committee: prof. dr. E.C. van Ierland prof. dr. ir. J. Sopaheluwakan prof. dr. ir. C. Zevenbergen dr. H. De Moel dr. F. Colombijn dr. R. van Voorst Cover design: The shadow puppet’s Gunungan depicting a natural forested area at the top and a human area at the bottom. The Gunungan is used to change the scene throughout the story. The background is batik pattern Mega Mendung (thick cloud) and water. Cover design by Dinzagi Zainuddin and the author Printed by: IPSKAMP printing Yus Budiyono Flood risk modeling in Jakarta: development and usefulness in a time of climate change, 146 pages. PhD Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands (2018) With references, with summaries in English and Dutch. ISBN: 978-94-028-1195-7 iii VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT Flood risk modeling in Jakarta development and usefulness in a time of climate change ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr. V. Subramaniam in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van de promotiecommissie van de Faculteit der Bètawetenschappen op 21 november 2018 om 09:45 uur in de aula van de universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105 door Yus Budiyono geboren te Semarang, Indonesie iv Table of Contents Summary ..............................................................................................................................................................
  • Flooding in Jakarta Towards a Blue City with Improved Water Management

    Flooding in Jakarta Towards a Blue City with Improved Water Management

    MARK CALJOUW, PETER J.M. NAS AND PRATIWO Flooding in Jakarta Towards a blue city with improved water management Sunday, 27 January 2002, a large flood swept down on Jakarta and inundated several parts of the city.1 From the evening of 27 January to the morning of 28 January rain came streaming down, and the dike south of Jakarta broke. The pungent black water, with a hefty cargo of garbage, poured onto the main roads to Bogor, Kramat Jati and East Jakarta. In North Jakarta, in Kelurahan Pejagalan, Kecamatan Penjaringan, the flooding or banjir hit at midnight and continued until five o’clock in the morning, reaching levels as high as 20 cm. Even harder hit was Kelurahan Kapuk Muara, inundated with 70 cm of water.2 In West Jakarta the flood invaded houses and main thoroughfares. At Kelurahan Tanjung Duren Utara the waters rose 120 cm after the dike con- taining the Sekretaris and Gendong Rivers gave way, while the water at Tomang Barat Reservoir could no longer be controlled. River water spread over the housing estates and urban kampongs of West Jakarta. Daan Mogot Street and the housing in its vicinity were the first to be reached by the giant flood. Cars had to be evacuated before being overwhelmed by the deluge, and all furniture on the ground floor of two-storey houses had to be moved 1 This article is based on personal experience with floods in Jakarta, interviews with experts, and the study of historical material, newspapers, and official reports. 2 ‘Hujan lebat guyur Jakarta sejumlah permukiman tergenang’, Suara Pembaruan, 28-1-2003.
  • Elucidating Flood Disaster Problems in the World Capital Cities: Analyzing the Role of Humantrain Supply Chain

    Elucidating Flood Disaster Problems in the World Capital Cities: Analyzing the Role of Humantrain Supply Chain

    712 Int. J Sup. Chain. Mgt Vol. 9, No. 3, June 2020 Elucidating Flood Disaster Problems in the World Capital Cities: Analyzing the Role of Humantrain Supply Chain Muzani' ' Geography Study Program, Faculty of Social Sciences, Jakarta State University Jl. Rawamangun Muka, RT.11/RW.14, Rawamangun, Kec. Pulo Gadung, Kota Jakarta Timur, DKI Jakarta 13220 [email protected] Abstract-Jakarta is one of the cities that is often hit by Dutch government built 3 dams. Jago Dam and Udik floods. The problem of flooding in Jakarta is actually not a Dam, both of which are located at the top of the river and new thing. Many factors make Jakarta city vulnerable to Bendungan Hilir which are located downstream of the flooding. These factors are natural and anthropogenic Ciliwung river (Jakarta) [10]. As a result of a massive factors. These natural factors are: (1) Jakarta is located in flood in 1876, the Dutch government rebuilt the Flood the lowlands near the coast, (2) there are 13 rivers flowing Canal which stretched from the Manggarai area in the through Jakarta, and (3) the high annual rainfall in the center of the city to the Muara Angke area in the coastal Ciliwung watershed (> 3000 mm). While anthropogenic factors are: (1) landscape changes due to high competition area of Jakarta. The existence of this canal is intended to in land-based economic activities, (2) poor urban and rural prevent flooding in Jakarta. It is hoped that through this spatial planning, and (3) lack of integrated institutional canal, flood water will flow faster to the Java Sea on the capacity and arrangements, especially in cross-border coast of Jakarta.
  • Floods in Jakarta, Banten, and West Java Province, Republic of Indonesia

    Floods in Jakarta, Banten, and West Java Province, Republic of Indonesia

    Emergency Situation Report # 6 19 February 2007 Floods in Jakarta, Banten, and West Java Province, Republic of Indonesia Type of Emergency Floods, triggered by heavy seasonal rain. Background • 40 % of Jakarta is located under the sea level. • Jakarta is prone to flood due to poor drainage. • Jakarta experienced yearly and major similar magnitude of flood in 2002. Table showing the history of floods in Jakarta. No Year Affect 1 1699 Ciliwung river floods “Oud (old) Batavia” after Mount Salak erupts 2 1714 Ciliwung river overflows after clearing forest areas in Puncak. 3 1854 “Niew (new) Batavia” is a meter underwater, caused by the raging Ciliwung. 4 1918 Extensive flooding. The Dutch colonial government begins work n the Western Flood Canal. 5 1942 The Canal is completed, but Jakarta still floods. 6 1996 A flood sweeps through the capital. Approximately 10 people die. 7 2002 The Dartmouth Flood Observatory notes it as the largest flood in Jakarta’s history, 25 people died. 8 2007 The greatest flood to fit Jakarta in the last three centuries. Diagrammatic map showing the geographic location of Jakarta. 1 Emergency Situation Report # 6 19 February 2007 Present Situation • On Tuesday, 23 January 2007, 150 mm heavy rains down poured Bogor, Depok and southern parts of Jakarta since caused Ciliwung River and Pesanggrahan River to overflow. • The flood has inundated 60% of Jakarta. • More than 70,000 houses in Jakarta, Tangerang and Bekasi were flooded. • The water level ranged from 10 centimeters to 7 meters. • The present year’s flood was much worse than the deluge of 2002.
  • The Situation with Local and National Resources

    The Situation with Local and National Resources

    Information bulletin Indonesia: Floods in North Sumatera, West Java, Bengkulu and DKI Jakarta provinces Glide n° Date of issue: 1 January 2020 Date of disaster: 28 December 2019 – 31 December Point of contact: Arifin M. Hadi, PMI Head of 2019 Disaster Management Operation start date: 28 December 2019 Category of disaster: Yellow Host National Society: Indonesian Red Cross (Palang Merah Indonesia) Number of people affected: TBC (assessment is Number of people to be assisted: TBC (assessment ongoing) is ongoing) This bulletin is issued for information only and reflects the current situation and details available at this time. The Indonesian Red Cross – Palang Merah Indonesia (PMI), with the support of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), are continuing to monitor and respond to the situation with local and national resources. If required, additional financial resources will be sought via the relevant IFRC international disaster response mechanism. The situation Multiple provinces (North Sumatera, West Java, Bengkulu and Jakarta) in Indonesia has been experiencing flooding starting from 28 December 2019. The floods are affecting the provinces at different scales. The total numbers of people affected have not been confirmed as assessments are ongoing. Below are some details by localities. Flash Flooding in North Sumatera province Due to heavy and intense rainfall in the area, flash flooding occurred and affected four villages (Pematang, Hatapang, Batu Tunggal and Merbau Selatan) in Labuhanbatu Utara districts. Approximately 229 households (857 people) have been affected by the flash floods. In addition, 39 houses have been severely damaged, 83 moderately damaged, and eight houses washed away by the flash floods.
  • River Flood Risk in Jakarta Under Scenarios of Future Change

    River Flood Risk in Jakarta Under Scenarios of Future Change

    Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 757–774, 2016 www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/16/757/2016/ doi:10.5194/nhess-16-757-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. River flood risk in Jakarta under scenarios of future change Yus Budiyono1,2, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts1, Daniel Tollenaar3, and Philip J. Ward1 1Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology (BPPT), Jakarta, Indonesia 3Deltares, Delft, the Netherlands Correspondence to: Y. Budiyono ([email protected]) Received: 29 May 2015 – Published in Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.: 30 July 2015 Revised: 30 January 2016 – Accepted: 12 February 2016 – Published: 17 March 2016 Abstract. Given the increasing impacts of flooding in 1 Introduction Jakarta, methods for assessing current and future flood risk are required. In this paper, we use the Damagescanner- Jakarta risk model to project changes in future river flood Jakarta, the capital city of Indonesia, suffers from regular risk under scenarios of climate change, land subsidence, and floods that cause significant economic damage. For example, land use change. Damagescanner-Jakarta is a simple flood the major floods in 2002, 2007, 2013, and 2014 have caused risk model that estimates flood risk in terms of annual ex- billions of dollars of direct and indirect economic damage pected damage, based on input maps of flood hazard, expo- (Bappenas, 2007; Ward et al., 2013a; Sagala et al., 2013). sure, and vulnerability. We estimate baseline flood risk at Whilst flooding in Jakarta is not a new problem per se (No- USD 186 million p.a.
  • The Evolution of Jakarta's Flood Policy Over the Past 400 Years

    The Evolution of Jakarta's Flood Policy Over the Past 400 Years

    The evolution of Jakarta’s flood policy over the past 400 years: The lock-in of infrastructural solutions Abstract This paper presents an analysis of the evolution of flood policy in a city in the developing world. Jakarta was selected in order to analyse of the role of colonialisation on water policy. Drawing data from historical sources and interviews of key informants, we mapped the history of flood-related investments made in the city for the past 400 years. Using analysis informed by historical institutionalism, we argue that Jakarta’s flood management institutions have been locked-in to infrastructural measures. Some major flood events were able to create critical junctures, resulting in the implementation of old policies and the instigation of flood research. However, they were not able to introduce institutional changes. The persistence of engineering driven solutions to cope with flooding can be explained by the positive feedback mechanisms taking place after major floods. Infrastructure, albeit expensive, provides a fast relief to flooding, which is ideal to short political cycles. Scientific knowledge introduced by the colonial government plays an important role in sustaining this persistence. The current massive seawall proposal to alleviate increasing flood risks due to land subsidence and sea level rise exacerbate the path-dependency of infrastructural measures. Keywords: Flood policy; postcolonial city; Jakarta; historical institutionalism; positive feedback 1. Introduction Many cities in the world are struggling with a myriad of urban problems (UN Habitat, 2016). In the case of Jakarta, it also has to deal with the fact that it is sinking fast to the ground.