Lyric Poetry, Conservative Poetics, and the Rise of Fascism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LYRIC POETRY, CONSERVATIVE POETICS, AND THE RISE OF FASCISM by CHET LISIECKI A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Comparative Literature and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2014! DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Chet Lisiecki Title: Lyric Poetry, Conservative Poetics, and the Rise of Fascism This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Comparative Literature by: Jeffrey Librett Chairperson Kenneth Calhoon Core Member Forest Pyle Core Member Martin Klebes Core Member David Luebke Institutional Representative and J. Andrew Berglund Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2014 ! ii © 2014 Chet Lisiecki “Lyric Poetry, Conservative Poetics, and the Rise of Fascism” by Chet Lisiecki is licensed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International Public License. To view a copy of this license, please visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ! iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Chet Lisiecki Doctor of Philosophy Department of Comparative Literature September 2014 Title: Lyric Poetry, Conservative Poetics, and the Rise of Fascism As fascist movements took hold across Europe in the 1920s and 1930s, there emerged a body of lyric poetry concerned with revolution, authority, heroism, sacrifice, community, heritage, and national identity. While the Nazi rise to power saw the deception, persecution, and brutalization of conservatives both in the Reichstag and in the streets, these themes resonated with fascists and conservatives alike, particularly in Germany. Whether they welcomed the new regime out of fear or opportunism, many conservative beneficiaries of National Socialism shared, and celebrated in poetry, the same ideological principles as the fascists. Such thematic continuities have made it seem as though certain conservative writers, including T. S. Eliot, Stefan George, and Hugo von Hofmannsthal, were proto- fascist, their work cohering around criteria consonant with fascist ideology. My dissertation, however, emphasizes the limits of such cohesion, arguing that fascist poetry rejects, whereas conservative poetry affirms, the possibility of indeterminacy and inadequacy. While the fascist poem blindly believes it can effect material political change, the conservative poem affirms the failure of its thematic content to correspond entirely to material political reality. It displays neither pure political commitment nor aesthetic autonomy, suspending these categories in an unresolved tension. Paul de Man’s work on allegory hinges on identifying a reading practice that ! iv addresses this space between political commitment and aesthetic autonomy. His tendency to forget the immanence of history, however, is problematic in the context of fascism. Considering rhetorical formalism alongside dialectical materialism, in particular Adorno’s essay “Lyric Poetry and Society,” allows for a more rounded and ethical methodological approach. The poetic dramatization of the very indeterminacy that historically constituted conservative politics in late-Weimar Germany both distinguishes the conservative from the fascist poem while also accounting for its complicity. Fascism necessitated widespread and wild enthusiasm, but it also succeeded through the (unintentional) proliferation of political indifference as registered, for example, by the popularity of entertainment literature. While the work of certain conservative high modernists reflected critically on its own failures, such indeterminacy nonetheless resembles the failure to politically commit oneself against institutionalized violence and systematic oppression. ! v CURRICULUM VITAE NAME OF AUTHOR: Chet Lisiecki GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE SCHOOLS ATTENDED: University of Oregon, Eugene Colorado College, Colorado Springs DEGREES AWARDED: Doctor of Philosophy, Comparative Literature, 2014, University of Oregon Bachelor of Arts, Comparative Literature with another discipline: Psychology, 2007, Colorado College AREAS OF SPECIAL INTEREST: German Literature and Philosophy Anglo-American Poetry and Poetics Aesthetics and Politics Literary Theory Comparative Modernisms PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Graduate Teaching Fellow, University of Oregon, 2007-2014 GRANTS, AWARDS, AND HONORS: Graduate Dissertation Fellowship, “Lyric Poetry, Conservative Poetics, and the Rise of Fascism,” Oregon Humanities Center, 2013 Summer Writing Fellowship, “‘Die gesetze des geistigen und des politischen’: Allegories of Interpretation in Stefan George’s Political Poetry,” Department of Comparative Literature, University of Oregon, 2013 Beall Educational Opportunity Award, “‘Der Dichter als Führer’: The Political Stakes of Creative Writing During the Rise of National Socialism,” Department of Comparative Literature, 2013 Graduate Research Scholarship, “Poetry and Poetics of Nazi Germany,” German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), 2011 Phi Beta Kappa, Colorado College, 2007 ! vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the generous support of the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, which allowed me to conduct archival research throughout Germany, and Professor Gregor Streim, with whom I worked at the Freie Universität and whose guidance proved invaluable at the outset of this project. Likewise, I am grateful to the hospitable and accommodating staff at the Deutsches Literaturarchiv, the Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, the Bundesarchiv, and the Universtitätsbibliothek at the Freie Universität, who made my time at each institution both pleasant and efficient, even, in one instance, after my reservation had been lost. And I am of course thankful for the archives and libraries themselves, which have preserved incredibly important documents that have until very recently gone unobserved. I would also like to express my appreciation to the Oregon Humanities Center, which provided me with much needed relief from my duties as a GTF to focus entirely on my research. The Department of Comparative Literature, in particular Professors Lisa Freinkel and Ken Calhoon, provided invaluable guidance and support from the first day I stepped foot in Villard Hall. Professor Jeffrey Librett, who introduced me to Stefan George, has never let me forget the big picture, both in terms of my scholarship and my career. Professor Tres Pyle taught me everything I know about Paul de Man, and his passion for what we do will forever remain an inspiration. My experience working with Professor Martin Klebes has drastically improved my writing and argumentation, and I am extremely grateful for the time he spent helping me get to Germany. Professor David Luebke has always asked the right questions, particularly those that someone with formalist tendencies like myself might overlook. Once again, thank you to Professor Ken ! vii Calhoon for listening, for believing in the project, and for reminding me why I got into this business in the first place. Thank you also to Professors Corinne Schreiner, Re Evitt, and Bill Davis, who introduced me to comparative literature, sparked my critical imagination, and encouraged me to go for it. Thank you to Cynthia Stockwell, for never letting me miss a deadline or misspell my name, and to my very many colleagues over the years, whose names are too many to list, for making Eugene home. I am especially grateful to Jamie Richards and Emily McGinn, whose company helped me survive those long days and nights in the office. One day we’ll be eating swurritos on our Portuguese vineyard. Thank you also to Amanda Cornwall for the hugs, Jacob Barto for the laughs, and my cohort for their enduring solidarity. Finally, this accomplishment would never have been possible without the love and support of my family, my inimitable best friend Rachel Feder, and partner Craig Schinaman, whose patience continues to astound me. ! viii To Mom, Dad, Kane, and G.G. ! ix TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION: WHY “FASCIST LITERARY MODERNISM” NOW? ................ 1 II. “DIE GESETZE DES GEISTIGEN UND DES POLITISCHEN”: ALLEGORIES OF INTERPRETATION IN STEFAN GEORGE’S POLITICAL POETRY ........................... 20 III. “RESIGN, RESIGN, RESIGN”: T. S. ELIOT AND THE AFFIRMATION OF FAILURE ................................................................................................................................ 54 IV. “IN EINES GEDICHTET WERDEN”: THE CONSERVATIVE REVOLUTION, LITERATURE, AND THE NONPOLITICAL .................................................................. 115 V. THE OPPORTUNISM OF FASCIST LITERARY AESTHETICS AND CULTURAL POLICY .................................................................................................................................. 165 VI. CONCLUSION: THE RESISTANCE OF SIMULATION: FRAGMENTATION AND TOTALITY IN FRIEDRICH GEORG JUENGER’S “DER MOHN” .................... 217 APPENDIX: ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................... 231 REFERENCES CITED .......................................................................................................... 232 ! x CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION: WHY “FASCIST LITERARY MODERNISM” NOW? In the introduction to the 1993 book Fascist Modernism: Aesthetics, Politics, and the Avant-Garde, Andrew Hewitt poses the question, “why fascist modernism?” This question seems even more pressing