1 Minimizing Map Distortion Using Oblique Projections Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degre

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Minimizing Map Distortion Using Oblique Projections Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degre Minimizing Map Distortion Using Oblique Projections Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jiaqi Zhang Graduate Program in Geodetic Science The Ohio State University 2017 Thesis Committee Dr. Alan John Saalfeld, Advisor Dr. C.K. Shum 1 Copyrighted by Jiaqi Zhang 2017 2 Abstract We provide a precise mathematical definition of map distortion, and we introduce several map projections that have minimal distortion for certain specific regions of the Earth (namely, regions whose boundary consists of one or two parallels of latitude). The minimizing projections for these regions will all have normal aspect. We show that oblique aspect projections have the same distortion properties as their normal aspect counterparts on earth regions bounded by one lesser circle or by two lesser circles lying in parallel planes. We summarize the good consequences of having small distortion, and we outline a strategy for finding the best oblique map projection of least distortion for any region on the Earth. We then implement that strategy to find projections of least distortion for some unusually shaped countries, states and other regions. ii Acknowledgments It’s a great honor to have the opportunity to study and research at the Ohio State University and these years are the most precious time of my life. I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Alan John Saalfeld, the most important and kind person in my academic life here. Besides instructing me knowledge and the way to conduct research, he cultivates my capacity for independent thinking and attitude on scientific research. Also, my thanks go to Dr. Michael G Bevis, who inspires me a lot and supports our research. Moreover, I want to show my respect and appreciations to those excellent professors in my department like Dr. Jekeli and Dr. Schaffrin. Finally, I would like to thank my parents for supporting me financially and mentally. iii Vita 2010 - 2014 B.S., Geographic Information System and Cartography, Wuhan University, China 2014 – present M.S., Geodetic Science, School of Earth Sciences, The Ohio State University Fields of Study Major Field: Geodetic Science iv Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. iii Vita ..................................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables .................................................................................................................... vii List of Figures .................................................................................................................. viii Chapter 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Scale and Distortion .................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2. Background and Knowledge ............................................................................. 4 2.1 Projections................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Scales Calculation ..................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Normal Aspect Projections ..................................................................................... 10 2.3.1 Normal Aspect Azimuthal Projections ............................................................ 11 2.3.2 Normal Aspect Cylindrical Projections ........................................................... 11 2.3.3 Normal Aspect Conic Projection ..................................................................... 12 2.4 Oblique Projections ................................................................................................. 13 2.5 Comparison of Normal and Oblique Aspect Projections ........................................ 21 2.6 Normal and Oblique Aspect Projection’s Equivalent Properties of Distortion ...... 23 Chapter 3. Oblique Azimuthal Projection ......................................................................... 25 3.1 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 25 3.2 Experiments ............................................................................................................ 28 3.2.1 Data Preprocessing........................................................................................... 28 3.2.2 Main Programs ................................................................................................. 31 3.3 Results Analysis ...................................................................................................... 32 Chapter 4. Oblique Cylindrical Projection........................................................................ 35 4.1 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 35 v 4.2 Experiments ............................................................................................................ 37 4.2.1 Data Preprocessing........................................................................................... 37 4.2.2 Main Programs ................................................................................................. 38 4.3 Results Analysis ...................................................................................................... 40 Chapter 5. Oblique Conic Projection ................................................................................ 43 5.1 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 43 5.2 Experiments ............................................................................................................ 45 5.2.1 Data Preprocessing........................................................................................... 45 5.2.2 Main Programs ................................................................................................. 45 5.3 Results Analysis ...................................................................................................... 46 Chapter 6. Evaluation........................................................................................................ 48 6.1 Evaluation of Performance ..................................................................................... 48 6.2 Evaluation of Effectiveness .................................................................................... 50 Chapter 7. Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 56 7.1 Discussion on angle and area distortion.................................................................. 56 7.2 Practical significance of oblique projections .......................................................... 58 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................... 60 vi List of Tables Table 1. Classification of normal aspect tangent projections. .......................................... 10 Table 2. Distortion for the equidistant azimuthal projection of a circular area. ............... 14 Table 3. Distortion for cylindrical projections of band around a great circle. .................. 16 Table 4. Distortion for conic projections of band around a lesser circle. ......................... 18 Table 5. Distortion for conic projections of band around a lesser circle. ......................... 19 Table 6. Comparison of normal aspect projection VS. oblique aspect. ............................ 21 Table 7. Distortions under different equidistant oblique projections. .............................. 48 Table 8. US states fitting within a spherical cap. .............................................................. 58 Table 9. Countries fitting within a spherical cap. ............................................................. 59 vii List of Figures Figure 1. Geodesic curves on the datum surface and the projection surface. ..................... 3 Figure 2. Map projection scale determination by curve tangents. ...................................... 4 Figure 3. Maps of Ohio using different projections (cylindrical on left, conic on right). .. 6 Figure 4. Maps of South America using different projections. ........................................... 7 Figure 5. Normal aspect projections' scales. ....................................................................... 8 Figure 6. Equidistant normal aspect projections' scales. .................................................... 9 Figure 7. Distortion = ((x/R)/sin(x/R)-1)*100. ................................................................. 15 Figure 8. Distortion = ([2tan(x/2R)/sin(x/R)]-1)*100. ..................................................... 15 Figure 9. Distortion of a given width band region (Unit of x: KM). ................................ 17 Figure 10. Distortion of a given width band region (Unit of x: KM). ......................... 19 Figure 11. Distortion of a given width band region (Unit of x: KM). .............................. 20 Figure 12. Normal VS. Oblique aspect azimuthal
Recommended publications
  • Viewing in 3D
    Viewing in 3D Viewing in 3D Foley & Van Dam, Chapter 6 • Transformation Pipeline • Viewing Plane • Viewing Coordinate System • Projections • Orthographic • Perspective OpenGL Transformation Pipeline Viewing Coordinate System Homogeneous coordinates in World System zw world yw ModelViewModelView Matrix Matrix xw Tractor Viewing System Viewer Coordinates System ProjectionProjection Matrix Matrix Clip y Coordinates v Front- xv ClippingClipping Wheel System P0 zv ViewportViewport Transformation Transformation ne pla ing Window Coordinates View Specifying the Viewing Coordinates Specifying the Viewing Coordinates • Viewing Coordinates system, [xv, yv, zv], describes 3D objects with respect to a viewer zw y v P v xv •A viewing plane (projection plane) is set up N P0 zv perpendicular to zv and aligned with (xv,yv) yw xw ne pla ing • In order to specify a viewing plane we have View to specify: •P0=(x0,y0,z0) is the point where a camera is located •a vector N normal to the plane • P is a point to look-at •N=(P-P)/|P -P| is the view-plane normal vector •a viewing-up vector V 0 0 •V=zw is the view up vector, whose projection onto • a point on the viewing plane the view-plane is directed up Viewing Coordinate System Projections V u N z N ; x ; y z u x • Viewing 3D objects on a 2D display requires a v v V u N v v v mapping from 3D to 2D • The transformation M, from world-coordinate into viewing-coordinates is: • A projection is formed by the intersection of certain lines (projectors) with the view plane 1 2 3 ª x v x v x v 0 º ª 1 0 0 x 0 º « » «
    [Show full text]
  • Map Projections
    Map Projections Chapter 4 Map Projections What is map projection? Why are map projections drawn? What are the different types of projections? Which projection is most suitably used for which area? In this chapter, we will seek the answers of such essential questions. MAP PROJECTION Map projection is the method of transferring the graticule of latitude and longitude on a plane surface. It can also be defined as the transformation of spherical network of parallels and meridians on a plane surface. As you know that, the earth on which we live in is not flat. It is geoid in shape like a sphere. A globe is the best model of the earth. Due to this property of the globe, the shape and sizes of the continents and oceans are accurately shown on it. It also shows the directions and distances very accurately. The globe is divided into various segments by the lines of latitude and longitude. The horizontal lines represent the parallels of latitude and the vertical lines represent the meridians of the longitude. The network of parallels and meridians is called graticule. This network facilitates drawing of maps. Drawing of the graticule on a flat surface is called projection. But a globe has many limitations. It is expensive. It can neither be carried everywhere easily nor can a minor detail be shown on it. Besides, on the globe the meridians are semi-circles and the parallels 35 are circles. When they are transferred on a plane surface, they become intersecting straight lines or curved lines. 2021-22 Practical Work in Geography NEED FOR MAP PROJECTION The need for a map projection mainly arises to have a detailed study of a 36 region, which is not possible to do from a globe.
    [Show full text]
  • 189 09 Aju 03 Bryon 8/1/10 07:25 Página 31
    189_09 aju 03 Bryon 8/1/10 07:25 Página 31 Measuring the qualities of Choisy’s oblique and axonometric projections Hilary Bryon Auguste Choisy is renowned for his «axonometric» representations, particularly those illustrating his Histoire de l’architecture (1899). Yet, «axonometric» is a misnomer if uniformly applied to describe Choisy’s pictorial parallel projections. The nomenclature of parallel projection is often ambiguous and confusing. Yet, the actual history of parallel projection reveals a drawing system delineated by oblique and axonometric projections which relate to inherent spatial differences. By clarifying the intrinsic demarcations between these two forms of parallel pro- jection, one can discern that Choisy not only used the two spatial classes of pictor- ial parallel projection, the oblique and the orthographic axonometric, but in fact manipulated their inherent differences to communicate his theory of architecture. Parallel projection is a form of pictorial representation in which the projectors are parallel. Unlike perspective projection, in which the projectors meet at a fixed point in space, parallel projectors are said to meet at infinity. Oblique and axonometric projections are differentiated by the directions of their parallel pro- jectors. Oblique projection is delineated by projectors oblique to the plane of pro- jection, whereas the orthographic axonometric projection is defined by projectors perpendicular to the plane of projection. Axonometric projection is differentiated relative to its angles of rotation to the picture plane. When all three axes are ro- tated so that each is equally inclined to the plane of projection, the axonometric projection is isometric; all three axes are foreshortened and scaled equally.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Impairment and Deafblind Education Quarterly Volume 61
    Visual Impairment and Deafblind Education Quarterly 2016 Convention Issue Volume 61 Number 2 2016 ; Lorem Ipsum Dolor Spring 2016 This is a publication of the Council for Exceptional Children’s Division on Visual Impairments and DeafBlindness (CEC- DVIDB). Advertisements included in this issue are not endorsements of products or services, and individual views of authors are not necessarily the official position of CEC and/or DVIDB. Cover Photo Cover photo is of the St. Louis arch. St. Louis, Missouri was the home of CEC’s 2016 International Convention. Photograph courtesy of Stephanie Barrows. 2 2 ; Lorem Ipsum Dolor Spring 2016 Volume 61, Number 21 Page 6 Message from the Editor 8 President’s Message 14 Virgina M. Sowell Award: Jessica Kolvites 16 Dissertation of the Year Award: Dr. Ellen Bowman 19 Teacher of the Year Award: Rachel Schles 23 Exemplary Advocate Award: Teresa Lacy 26 Distinguished Service Award: Dr. Alana Zambone 30 Including Students Who Are Blind or Have Low Vision in English Language Proficiency Assessments 35 Early Intervention and Visual Impairments: A Prepared Workforce 53 Introducing the iBraille Challenge! 3 3 ; Lorem Ipsum Dolor Spring 2016 Volume 61, Number 2 Page 60 Mathematics Instruction for Students with Visual Impairments: What is there and where can we go 70 Peer Assisted Learning Strategies to Improve Reading Fluency and Socialization Among Students Who Are Blind and Visually Impaired 77 University and School for the Deaf and Blind Parternship Experience 79 The Expanded Core Curriculum: What We Learned at the Florida School for the Deaf and Blind 85 Experience of a Lifetime for an Undergraduate Student 92 Missouri School for the Blind 107 DVIDB Professional Standards Committee Report 4 4 ; Lorem Ipsum Dolor Spring 2016 Volume 61, Number 2 Page 109 Ad Hoc Committee on DVIDB Position Paper 116 The Expanded Core Curriculum 137 CEC Membership Application 5 5 ; Lorem Ipsum Dolor Spring 2016 Kathleen Farrand, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewing and Projection Viewing and Projection
    Viewing and Projection The topics • Interior parameters • Projection type • Field of view • Clipping • Frustum… • Exterior parameters • Camera position • Camera orientation Transformation Pipeline Local coordinate Local‐>World World coordinate ModelView World‐>Eye Matrix Eye coordinate Projection Matrix Clip coordina te others Screen coordinate Projection • The projection transforms a point from a high‐ dimensional space to a low‐dimensional space. • In 3D, the projection means mapping a 3D point onto a 2D projection plane (or called image plane). • There are two basic projection types: • Parallel: orthographic, oblique • Perspective Orthographic Projection Image Plane Direction of Projection z-axis z=k x 1000 x y 0100 y k 000k z 1 0001 1 Orthographic Projection Oblique Projection Image Plane Direction of Projection Properties of Parallel Projection • Definition: projection directions are parallel. • Doesn’t look real. • Can preserve parallel lines Projection PlllParallel in 3D PlllParallel in 2D Properties of Parallel Projection • Definition: projection directions are parallel. • Doesn’t look real. • Can preserve parallel lines • Can preserve ratios t ' t Projection s s :t s' :t ' s' Properties of Parallel Projection • Definition: projection directions are parallel. • Doesn’t look real. • Can preserve parallel lines • Can preserve ratios • CANNOT preserve angles Projection Properties of Parallel Projection • Definition: projection directions are parallel. • Doesn’t look real. • Can preserve parallel
    [Show full text]
  • New Techniques and Applications P4
    TUESDAY PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST ANNUAL MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 1984 measure EFs which correlate well with gamma camera measurements) was employed to record sequential 2 minute time activity curves from the left ventricles of 6 healthy men (ages 19-24) during a control period and during a 30 8:00-10:00 Petree Hall in the Los Angeles Convention Center minute stress interview with a psychiatrist. Four o£the subjects were also monitored in a cold room (1°C) for 20 min« In addition to the left ventricular time-activity FORMAL OPENING AND PLENARY SESSION curve, heart rate (HR), and BP (cuff) were recorded. All 8:15 WELCOME AND TRIBUTE TO THE FOUNDER'S subjects had increases in HR, BP and EF during the stress interview. Cold, however, produced decreases in HR and EF GROUP,* Merle K. Loken, M.D., Ph.D., and an increase in BP. The results (mean±Su)are tabulated below: President, Society of Nuclear Medicine HR BP EF Rest 66+ 2 121/80 ±13/4 51+11 REMARKS: B. Leonard Holman, M.D., Chairman, Sci Interview 76+11* 158/101+ 7/7* 68+13* Rest Pre-cold 70+ 7 114/76 +12/5 58+ 7 entific Program Committee 1984 Cold 63+ 4* 141/94 +14/5* 37+ 4* *p<.05 REMARKS: Shelley D. Hartnett, CNMT, President, End-systolic and end-diastolic counts and hence volume decreased during the interview and increased during cold Technologist Section exposure. These data suggest that (1) ambulatory changes in REMARKS: Thomas P. Haynie III, M.D., Chairman, ventricular function can be measured with the VEST, and (2) significant changes in cardiovascular physiology are seen Credentials and Membership Committee in normal subjects during a stress interview and exposure to cold.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Drawing
    LECTURE NOTES For Environmental Health Science Students Engineering Drawing Wuttet Taffesse, Laikemariam Kassa Haramaya University In collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education 2005 Funded under USAID Cooperative Agreement No. 663-A-00-00-0358-00. Produced in collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education. Important Guidelines for Printing and Photocopying Limited permission is granted free of charge to print or photocopy all pages of this publication for educational, not-for-profit use by health care workers, students or faculty. All copies must retain all author credits and copyright notices included in the original document. Under no circumstances is it permissible to sell or distribute on a commercial basis, or to claim authorship of, copies of material reproduced from this publication. ©2005 by Wuttet Taffesse, Laikemariam Kassa All rights reserved. Except as expressly provided above, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission of the author or authors. This material is intended for educational use only by practicing health care workers or students and faculty in a health care field. PREFACE The problem faced today in the learning and teaching of engineering drawing for Environmental Health Sciences students in universities, colleges, health institutions, training of health center emanates primarily from the unavailability of text books that focus on the needs and scope of Ethiopian environmental students.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthographic Projection
    Introduction to Viewing 14 Objectives • Introduce viewing •Compare and contrast image formation by computer with how images have been formed by architects, artists, and engineers • Learn the benefits and drawbacks of each type of view 29 Classical Viewing • Viewing requires three basic elements - Object(s) to be viewed - Projection surface (image plane) - Projectors: lines that go from the object(s) to the projection surface •Classical views are based on the relationship among these elements - Must orient the object as it should be viewed • Object assumed to be constructed from flat principal faces - Buildings, polyhedra, manufactured objects 30 15 Classical Viewing • Projectors are lines that either - converge at a center of projection (COP) - or are parallel • Standard projections project onto a plane • Such projections preserve lines - but not necessarily angles • Nonplanar projections are needed for applications such as map construction 31 Classical Projections 32 16 Parallel vs Perspective • Computer graphics treats all projections the same and implements them with a single pipeline • Classical viewing developed different techniques for drawing different types of projections • Fundamental distinction is between parallel and perspective viewing (even though mathematically parallel viewing is the limit of perspective viewing) 33 Parallel Projection 34 17 Perspective Projection 35 Taxonomy of Planar Geometric Projections planar geometric projections parallel perspective 1 point2 point 3 point multiview axonometric oblique orthographic
    [Show full text]
  • CARTOGRAPHIC PORTRAYAL of TERRAIN in OBLIQUE PARALLEL PROJECTION Pyry Kettunen, Tapani Sarjakoski, L
    CARTOGRAPHIC PORTRAYAL OF TERRAIN IN OBLIQUE PARALLEL PROJECTION Pyry Kettunen, Tapani Sarjakoski, L. Tiina Sarjakoski, Juha Oksanen Finnish Geodetic Institute Department of Geoinformatics and Cartography P.O. Box 15 FI-02431 Masala Finland e-mails: [email protected] Abstract The visualization of three-dimensional spatial information as oblique views is widely regarded as beneficial for the perceiving of three-dimensional space. From the cartographic perspective, oblique views need to be carefully designed, in order to help the map reader to form a useful mental model of the terrain. In this study, 3D cartographic methods were applied to illustrate directions, distances and heights in oblique views. An oblique parallel projection was used for representing the view in a metrically homogeneous manner and for emphasizing the relative heights. The height was further visualized using directed lighting, hypsographic coloring and contours. In addition, an equilateral and equiangular grid was draped on the terrain model, for fixing the cardinal directions and for facilitating the estimation of distances and surface areas. These methods were combined and analyzed in a case study on a high-resolution DEM covering a national park area. The resulting oblique parallel views provide visual cues for the estimation of terrain dimensions, particularly heights. The results prepare a basis for further research on cartographic 3D visualization. Keywords: 3D cartography, oblique parallel projection, map grid, DEM 1 INTRODUCTION Outdoor leisure activities, such as forest hiking, have increasingly gained in popularity. These activities often benefit from navigational aids, such as route markings and maps. Recent technological developments have led to the successful implementation of personal navigation applications on mobile devices, which primarily focus on city life.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Growth Rotations of the Jaws
    AN INVESTIGATION OF GROWTH ROTATIONS OF THE JAWS STEPHEN DAVID SPRINGATE B.D.S.(Hons)., M.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D., F.D.S., D.Orth., M.Orth.R.C.S.(Eng). Department of Orthodontics UCL Eastman Dental Institute A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Medicine (Research) of University College London February, 2019 1 DECLARATION. I, Stephen David Springate, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own and that this thesis is the one on which I expect to be examined. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 ABSTRACT This thesis describes an investigation into the origin and mechanism of growth rotations of the jaws. The materials comprised serial lateral, frontal and oblique cephalometric radiographs of 11 untreated children (5 males and 6 females) with tantalum markers in the mandible and both maxillae. The radiographs were recorded annually over an average period of 9.6 years (mean age at initial records 7.21 years) and were drawn from the archives of the Mathews Longitudinal Growth Study of the University of California, USA. The investigation comprised two separate but related studies: (i) an initial survey examining the correlations between growth rotations of the jaws and growth changes at sites throughout the face; and (ii) an in-depth investigation of the patterning of the sequences of annual increments of growth employing time-series analysis to detect intra-individual co- ordination of growth. The initial survey revealed a series of associations that matched those found in previous implant studies but some exceptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Sketching Devices for Oblique Aerial Photographs
    138 PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING errors in planimetry proved to agree very the accompanying diagrams. well with the practical results. The error propagation formulae were de­ In summary, the results of the tests are rived in accordance with the well known very promising, and it seems desirable laws of the method of least squares and that the method be tested under varying for two different cases of the control point circumstances, also with such simple in­ location. struments as mirror stereoscopes and I n particular, the principles of the nu­ single image comparators (coordinato­ merical corrections and of compensation in graphs etc.) the control points were applied. In a Some examples of the theoretical dis­ similar way the error distribution in a tribution of the standard errors of the final triangulation strip can be derived and x-and y-coordinates are demonstrated in demonstrated. Two Sketching Devices for Oblique Aerial Photographs MIRIAM HERZOG, Engineer in Training, assisted by GIF FORD M. MAST, President, and w. K. GANNETT, Director of Engineering, Mast Development Company, Inc. ABSTRACT: The Mechanical Oblique Sketcher and the Optical Oblique Sketcher are two novel answers to the problem of rectifying aerial photos. The Mechanical Oblique Sketcher is a mechanization of a point by point geometric rectification procedure. The Oblique Photo Sketcher is a pro­ jection device for diapositives which utilizes an intense point source of light focused on a small aperture, simple lens to produce an unusual depth af field, permitting imaging the diapositive on a grossly tilted sur­ face. ERIAL photographs, taken at an ob­ of maps and charts from daily recon­ A lique angle to the earth, provide use­ naissance information.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Oblique Relief for Web Maps
    Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2015.1015169 Plan oblique relief for web maps Bernhard Jennya*, Jonas Buddeberga,b, Charlotte Hoarauc,d and Johannes Liema aCollege of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA; bInstitut für Geographie, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany; cIGN, COGIT, Saint-Mandé, France; dUniversité Paris-Est, Paris, France (Received 4 September 2014; accepted 19 December 2014) Plan oblique relief shows terrain with a side view on a two-dimensional map, resulting in visualizations where the third dimension of the terrain is more explicit than on traditional two-dimensional maps. Existing plan oblique maps are static: the angle of terrain inclination is not adjustable and the orientation of plan oblique inclination does not change with the orientation of the map. This article introduces two complementary methods that address these issues by using the 3D graphics pipeline to render plan oblique relief for tile-based web maps. The goal is to allow users to adjust the terrain inclination and map rotation angles to better visualize the third dimension of the terrain. The first method pre-renders plan oblique tiles with a server-side application. The tiles are visualized with a standard web mapping framework. The second method renders plan oblique relief on-the-fly in a web browser using WebGL and a customized version of OpenLayers 3, which enables users to select arbitrary terrain inclination and map rotation angles. The second method uses a tiled digital terrain model that is loaded by the web browser. The browser applies the plan oblique transformation, computes a shaded relief, and texturizes the terrain with tiled map layers.
    [Show full text]