DOCSLIB.ORG

6,480 MW Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project Six Vital Issues on Pancheshwar to Be Addressed Before Cashing Modi’S One Billion US Dollars SB Pun

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
6,480 MW Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project Six Vital Issues on Pancheshwar to Be Addressed Before Cashing Modi’S One Billion US Dollars SB Pun 6,480 MW Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project Six Vital Issues on Pancheshwar to be Addressed before Cashing Modi’s One Billion US Dollars SB Pun Abstract: Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Nepal in August 2014 was instrumental in reinvigorating the stalled 6,480 MW Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project. In particular, the one billion US Dollar soft loan for infrastructures that Modi offered to Nepal has generated much enthusiasm. As the Mahakali Treaty was ratified in September 1996, and as public memory is short, this article reverts back 18 years ago into the heady days when the Water Resources Minister, Pashupati SJB Rana, publicly claimed that the sun would now begin to ‘rise from the west’! At that time, even the leaders in the opposing camp (the CPN-UML), started to count their chickens in billions and billions of rupees accruing from the sale of electricity to India. Today, that ‘Som Sharma euphoria’ has again started to percolate among our political leaders. The article, hence, poses six vital issues that need to be ‘fixed’ before the Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project can begin to taxi along the runway: i) validity of Rashtriya Sankalpas/national strictures; ii) re- constituting the all-party Parliamentary Monitoring Joint Committee; iii) export of energy and its pricing principle; iv) formation of Mahakali River Commission; v) equal sharing of Mahakali waters after the completion of the Pancheshwar Project; and vi) determining the origin of Mahakali River. The author believes that until these vital issues are fixed in an amicable and good faith manner, the viability of the Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project will again be in doubt ! Key words: Mahakali Treaty, Panchameshwar Multipupose project, Nepal Background The newly elected Prime Minister of India, Narendra Development Authority (incidentally another PDA!) and Modi, landed on a two day visit to Nepal in early August the agreement to establish a PDA within six months have 2014. In typical ‘Veni, vidi, vici’1 style, Prime Minister been signed, sealed, and delivered. After finalization Modi enthralled the Nepalese from the high Honorable of detailed project report (DPR), the Pancheshwar Members of the Parliament down to the very ordinary Multipurpose Project is set to begin implementation Nepalese on the streets. The Modi ripple–in particular ‘within one year.’ This article attempts to raise a number the one billion US Dollar soft loan waved in front of the of vital issues on Pancheshwar vis-à-vis Mahakali Treaty Honorable Members –travelled far and wide. That ripple that to the Nepalese public still remain vague, obfuscated, reached the banks of Mahakali River at Pancheshwar and unsettled. Although the issues may stem from the culminating in the following joint press release from the 1996 ratification of the Mahakali Treaty, they still need governments of Nepal and India: to be addressed transparently in ‘good faith and trust’ The two Prime Ministers witnessed the signing of the by both the countries. Otherwise, the Pancheswar Exchange of Letters regarding Terms of Reference of project could again falter and float listlessly, despite the the Pancheshwar Development Authority. They agreed availability of one billion US dollars. that the two Governments would set up the Authority within 6 months and finalize the DPR of Pancheshwar Formation of Parliamentary Monitoring Joint Development Project and begin implementation of the Committee Officially Conveyed to Government Project within one year. of India (GoI) by Government of Nepal (GoN) The Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project was the Public memory is extremely short. So, for the benefit flagship item of the 1996 Mahakali Treaty. Except for of discussion, let us return to 1996. After the Mahakali a tiny minority, an overwhelming majority of the Joint Treaty was ratified on September 20, the Ministry of Session of the two Houses of Parliament ratified the Foreign Affairs/GoN on November 22 officially informed Mahakali Treaty in a historic2 fashion on the night of the Embassy of the Republic of India at Kathmandu September 20, 1996. In an overt effort to pat their own about treaty ratification ‘as per the provision of the backs, party leaders publicly made various tall claims3 Constitution4’ of Nepal. The Nepalese Ministry also about the billions of rupees that would accrue to Nepal requested the Indian Embassy to make necessary from electricity export to India. In fact, a gleeful and arrangements for the exchange5 of instruments of euphoric Water Resources Minister, Pashupati SJB ratification so that the treaty could come into force. The Rana, even claimed that the sun would now begin to following is a part of that official letter highlighting the ‘rise from the west’. However, the Pancheshwar flagship terms of reference of the Parliamentary Monitoring Joint faltered and began to float listlessly, directionless for the Committee and the eight important Nepal-India related last 18 years. issues that were discussed by the parliament while Suddenly, the Modi magic-wand has cranked alive ratifying the Mahakali Treaty: the engines of the listless Pancheshwar Multipurpose “The Ministry would like to inform that a Project. The Terms of Reference for the Pancheshwar Parliamentary Monitoring Joint Committee has been HYDRO NEPAL ISSUE NO. 15 JULY, 2014 7 formed under the chairmanship of the Rt. Hon. Speaker6 House of Representative, 1992 prevailing at that time.’ of the House of Representatives to give guidance to [the] GS Chintan queried10 the Ministry of Energy on this Nepalese side, during the preparation of the detailed same topic in December 2009 (Mangsir 23, 2066). project report, with a view to monitor the process The Ministry skillfully passed the buck by stating reflecting the resolution and commitment as expressed “this Ministry has no record of authoritative information by the parliament in safeguarding the national interest on the passing of Sankalpa Prastav as precondition by of Nepal. The Terms of Reference of the Committee were the then Parliament prior to the ratification of treaty, as follows: please avail all required information through the 1. export of energy and its pricing principle; Legislative Parliament Secretariat.’ The Parliament 2. formation of Mahakali River Commission; Secretariat replied in the usual circumventing manner 3. equal sharing of waters of the Mahakali River after on August 2010 (Shrawan 25, 2067) writing that “prior the Pancheswor project; and to ratification of treaty the then Parliament, as per the 4. Status of the Mahakali River. regulations of Parliament, has no officially registered In addition to advising about the formation of the Sankalpa Prastav about the above subject. Before Parliamentary Monitoring Joint Committee to look into ratification of the above treaty by the Joint Session of the above issues, the ministry would also like to draw the Parliament, records indicate Water Resources Minister attention of the Embassy to a number of issues on Nepal- Pashupati Shumsher JBR on behalf of the government India relations and other matters on the Mahakali Treaty with the concurrence of the main opposition CPN-UML and the utilization of the waters of Mahakali River, such presented the “sahamatikabunda/points agreed as: on.”’What does all this long-winded legal words mean 1. determination of the price of energy to be exported to in the end? Did Prime Minister SB Deuba with his India on the basis of the principle of avoided cost; Water Resources Minister Pashupati SJB Rana, Foreign 2. determination of the source of the Mahakali River; Minister Dr. PC Lohani and the CPN-UML General 3. withdrawal of the Indian military personnel from the Secretary MK Nepal merely pass half-baked strictures Nepalese territory; (sankalpas) in the Parliament? 4. return by India to Nepal of the excess land (36 acres7) So before kick-starting the Pancheshwar Multipurpose in Brahmadev Mandi/Tanakpur between pillar Nos. Project, the GoN must immediately declare whether 3 and 4; the four strictures (sankalpas), supposedly passed by 5. review of the 1950 treaty; the Joint Session of the two Houses of Parliament, 6. alternate transit route to Nepal to and through categorically exist or not ! Bangladesh; 7. developing river navigation for Nepal for trade All Party Parliamentary Monitoring Joint purposes; and Committee 8. monitoring the Nepal-India border. Though Nepal’s Foreign Ministry mentioned the In the light of the generally positive spirit shown by Parliamentary Monitoring Joint Committee, it was, the Indian side towards the issues mentioned above, the in fact, an All-Party Parliamentary Monitoring Joint Ministry hopes that the Nepalese concerns would be Committee that was constituted to provide an overall taken into account in a friendly and positive manner by guidance to the government11. the Government of India.” The Terms of Reference of the Committee were as The Mahakali issues posed in the above official letter follows: by the GoN to the GoI in 1996 are self-explanatory and 1. export of energy and its pricing principle; of vital importance for Nepal. While kick-starting the 2. formation of Mahakali River Commission; 18 year old Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project, the 3. equal sharing of waters of the Mahakali River after Nepalese public has the right to be informed about the the Pancheswor project; and present status. This article limits its discussion to the 4. Status of the Mahakali River. following vital six8 issues, four of them drawn from the Over a four year period from November 1996 to Terms of Reference
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jay Friedman LOCATION: Nepal TIME PERIOD: 20 Mar – 1 April 1973
    TITLE: Trekking for Smallpox in Nepal AUTHOR: Jay Friedman LOCATION: Nepal TIME PERIOD: 20 Mar – 1 April 1973 ROLE: Outbreak investigation FOREWORD In Nepal, as is well-known, the mountainous terrain made for many logistical and administrative difficulties in smallpox eradication. Conversely, from 1972 onward Nepal Smallpox Eradication Program (SEP) staff were present in all 75 districts of the country, which helped ensure that surveillance and containment of the few outbreaks that occurred in some of the mountainous areas would be well done. One of the best examples of this was an outbreak in Jurali Village, Latamandu Panchayat, Doti District, Seti Zone in early 1973. (At the time Nepal was divided into four Regions, 14 Zones (“Anchal” in Nepali), 75 districts and, within each district, a number of "panchayats", which in turn are sub-divided into nine wards and a number of villages.) A total of 13 days were spent going to and returning from the outbreak area by Dr. Benu Bahadur Karki, several members of a surveillance team and me. The story is as follows: THE TALE The SEP office in Kathmandu was notified of the outbreak via a telegram from our district office in the town of Silgadi Doti. Because Doti District is in the remote western hills of Nepal and difficult to reach from Kathmandu, my boss, Dr. M. Sathianathan (known to one and all as Sathy), persuaded his boss, the WHO Representative Dr. Peter Kim, to charter an airplane to transport us there. On March 20, 1973, at 12.30 PM, Dr. Karki, the surveillance team and I left for Doti in a Pilatus Porter of Royal Nepal Airlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Unicef Nepal
    -.;*• la 8 2 2 N P 7 5 '\ gà| UNICEF NEPAL WATER RESOURCE AVAILABILITY By S. Radojicic •••-• <*, 1975 LIB RA a Y !»<; • ¿I Roiere'iee Centre for GuiiiiM unity VVaier Supply WATER SUPPLY MD SANITATION SECTOR STUDY - NEPAL NP I'S WATER RESOURCE AVAILABILITY by S. RODOJICIC UNICEF Hy&rodeologist 1975 Li;:-- •' tnj -: • ••.•..V¡..*¡ t , ; :• . ,¡w »'.;•<;f- supply CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 - V RECOMMENDATIONS VI - IX INTRODUCTION ...,..,,, 1 1. SURFACE WATER OCCURRENCES „(liijàt ! 2. GROUND WATER OCCURRENCES ,..***,*. 5 2.1. Mountain complex ..............,..,........*.****,»*«** 5 2.1.1. High Himalayas *..*..*.. 6 2.1.2. Midland Zone 7 2.1.3. Mahabharat Range 13 2.1.4. Churia Hills „,., 14 2.2. Terai Region 15 2.2.1. Eastern Terai 17 2.2.2. Central Terai 18 2.3-2. Western Terai 19 2.2.3.1. Lumbini Zone 19 2.2.3.2. .Bkeri Zone 22 2.2.3.3. Seti-Mahakali Zone 24 3. FEASIBILITY OF TAPPING GROUND WATER IN THE TJ3RAI BY SHlJjLOW TUBE WELLS 24 3.1. Hydrogeological Conditions 26 3.2. Drilling Method and Equipment Required 29 3.3. Well Design, Construction and Cost .....30 4. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES INVOLVED IN THE WATER RESOURCES EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION . .*, 35 4.1. Water Supply and Sewerage Board ,.35 4.2. Water Supply and Sewerage Department 36 4.3. Remote Area and Local Development Department 39 4.4. Ground Water Section 40 4.5. Nepal Resettlement Co ,42 4.6 Constractors Service Available in Nepal ...4...42 REFERENCES SUMMARY x I. In Nepal there are real feasibilities the water supply of people to be settled by developing two water resources: surface and ground waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Kanchanpur District
    District Transport Master Plan (DTMP) For Kanchanpur District ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Government of Nepal District Transport Master Plan (DTMP) of Kanchanpur District Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads (DOLIDAR) District Development Committee, Kanchanpur Volume I Final Report January. 2016 Prepared by: Project Research and Engineering Associates for the District Development Committee (DDC) and District Technical Office (DTO), with Technical Assistance from the Department of Local Infrastructure and Agricultural Roads (DOLIDAR), Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development and grant supported by DFID through Rural Access Programme (RAP3). District Transport Master Plan (DTMP) For Kanchanpur District ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Project Research and Engineering Associates 1 District Transport Master Plan (DTMP) For Kanchanpur District ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Project Research and Engineering Associates Lagankhel, Lalitpur Phone: 5539607 Email: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Final Evaluation Combating Exploitive Child Labor Through Education in Nepal: Naya Bato Naya Paila Project -New Path New Steps
    FINAL (AFTER COMMENTS) Independent Final Evaluation Combating Exploitive Child Labor through Education in Nepal: Naya Bato Naya Paila Project -New Path New Steps- USDOL Cooperative Agreement No: IL-19513-09-75-K Report prepared by: Dr. Martina Nicolls April 2013 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................ v LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 1 Country Context ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Relevance: Shifting Project Priorities ................................................................................................................... 1 Effectiveness ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Efficiency .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Impact .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Sustainability .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Sarki People from Naubise Vdc of Dhading District
    16 Occasional Papers, Vol 11 SOCIO-CULTURAL SUBJECTIVITIES OF LANDLESSNESS IN NEPAL: A CASE STUDY OF SARKI PEOPLE FROM NAUBISE VDC OF DHADING DISTRICT Jailab Rai * Introduction Land is a primary resource for an agrarian economy in underdeveloped countries like Nepal. More than 85 percent of Nepal’s population lives in rural areas and more than 60 percent of the economically active population is involved in agriculture (HMG, 2003). Rapid population growth and increasing pressure on land resources to earn the much needed calorie is a major challenge in the country (Graner, 1997). In this context, the study of landlessness remains an important aspect of national agenda (Shrestha, 2001), particularly in the national inclusion process (Gurung, 2006). Moreover, the study of landlessness has become a policy debate and an issue of concern in the debates on national economic development (Shrestha, 2001). The sociological and anthropological understanding of landlessness has its own importance since it requires the analysis of cultural dimensions (Caplan, 1970 and 1972) as socio-cultural subjectivities in a historical context. The access to land resources or landlessness is an important social issue, which can be linked with social and cultural aspects of landless people as socio-cultural subjectivities in drawing out the implication of their access to land resources. This study deals with the socio-cultural subjectivities of landlessness with a focus on the Sarki people in the central hills of Nepal who are among the extremely marginalized groups of people in terms of the access and ownership to land resources. It reviews the process of * Jailab Rai holds M.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History and the Evolution of Thakuri Political Authority in a Subregion of Far Western Nepal Walter F
    Himalaya, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies Volume 4 Number 2 Himalayan Research Bulletin, Monsoon Article 7 1984 1984 Oral History and the Evolution of Thakuri Political Authority in A Subregion of Far Western Nepal Walter F. Winkler Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya Recommended Citation Winkler, Walter F. (1984) "Oral History and the Evolution of Thakuri Political Authority in A Subregion of Far Western Nepal," Himalaya, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies: Vol. 4: No. 2, Article 7. Available at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya/vol4/iss2/7 This Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by the DigitalCommons@Macalester College at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Himalaya, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ... ORAL HISTORY AND THE EVOLUTION OF THAKUR! POLITICAL AUTHORITY IN A SUBREGION OF FAR WESTERN NEPAL Walter F. Winkler Prologue John Hitchcock in an article published in 1974 discussed the evolution of caste organization in Nepal in light of Tucci's investigations of the Malia Kingdom of Western Nepal. My dissertation research, of which the following material is a part, was an outgrowth of questions John had raised on this subject. At first glance the material written in 1978 may appear removed fr om the interests of a management development specialist in a contemporary Dallas high technology company. At closer inspection, however, its central themes - the legitimization of hierarchical relationships, the "her o" as an organizational symbol, and th~ impact of local culture on organizational function and design - are issues that are relevant to industrial as well as caste organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Credit Agreement Public Disclosure Authorized
    CONFORMED COPY Public Disclosure Authorized CREDIT NUMBER 939 NEP Development Credit Agreement Public Disclosure Authorized (Second Rural Development Project) between KINGDOM OF NEPAL and Public Disclosure Authorized INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION Dated August 9, 1979 Public Disclosure Authorized CREDIT NUMBER 939 NEP DEVELOPMENT CREDIT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT, dated August 9, 1979, between KINGDOM OF NEPAL (hereinafter called the Borrower) and INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION (hereinafter called the Association). ARTICLE I General Conditions; Definitions Section 1.01. The parties to this Agreement accept all the provisions of the General Conditions Applicable to Development Credit Agreements of the Association, dated March 15, 1974, with the same force and effect as if they were fully set forth herein (said General Conditions Applicable to Development Credit Agreements of the Association being hereinafter called the General Conditions). Section 1.02. Wherever used in this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires, the several terms defined in the General Conditions have the respective meanings therein set forth and the following additional terms have the following meanings: (a) "PDCCC" means the Panchayat Development Central Coordi- nation Committee, established and operating pursuant to the Integrated Panchayat Development Decision of the Borrower, dated November 26, 1978 and vested with overall responsibility for coordination of planning and implementation of rural develop- ment projects within the Borrower's territory;
    [Show full text]
  • Benchmarking of Stage-Ii of Mahakali Irrigation System
    Government of Nepal Ministry of Irrigation Department of Irrigation Irrigation and Water Resources Management Project (IWRMP) Jawalakhel, Lalitpur BENCHMARKING OF STAGE-II OF MAHAKALI IRRIGATION SYSTEM Professional Alliance for Rural Development (P.) Ltd. Baneshwor, Kathmandu GPO Box:- 2995 Tel: +977-1-4780253 e-mail: [email protected] February, 2014 1 Table of Contents Government of Nepal .............................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 The Irrigation System ................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.1 General .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2.2 Stage Second Within MIP ..................................................................................................... 8 1.2.3 Water Resources ................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Need of the Study ........................................................................................................................ 10 1.4 Objective of the
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity
    NEPAL FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT TOTHECONVENTION ONBIOLOGICALDIVERSITY REPORT NATIONAL FOURTH NEPAL NEPAL FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Singha Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: +977 1 4220 067 / 4224 892 Government of Nepal Fax: +977 1 4223 868 / 4224 892 Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Website: www.mofsc.gov.np Singha Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal Email: [email protected] March 2009 NNEPALEPAL FFOURTHOURTH NNATIONALATIONAL RREPORTEPORT TTOO TTHEHE CCONVENTIONONVENTION OONN BBIOLOGICALIOLOGICAL DDIVERSITYIVERSITY Published by: Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation Tel: +977 1 4220 067 / 4224 892 Fax: +977 1 4223 868 / 4224 892 Website: www.mofsc.gov.np Email: [email protected] Review Team Uday R. Sharma, PhD. Pralad Yonzon, PhD. Eklabya Sharma, PhD. Prepared By: Prof. Ram Prasad Chaudhary Krishna Chandra Paudel, PhD. Sudhir Kumar Koirala Edited and Processed by: Deependra Joshi National Report Coordination Team 1. Dr. K.C. Paudel Coordinator 2. Dr. S.B. Bajracharya Member—NTNC 3. Dr. M.P. Upadhyay Member—NARC 4. Dr. Narendra Man Babu Pradhan Member—DNPWC 5. Prof. Madan Koirala Member—NEFEJ 6. Prof. Pramod Kumar Jha Member—TU 7. Dibya Gurung Member—UNDP 8. Sagar Kumar Rimal Member—DoF 9. Sudhir Kumar Koirala Member and Contact Person—MFSC The Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation encourages the usage of this material for educational and non-profit purpose, with appropriate credit to the publisher. The Ministry appreciates recieving a copy of any publication that uses this report as a source. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maoist Insurgency in Nepal: a Monograph
    THE MAOIST INSURGENCY IN NEPAL: A MONOGRAPH CAUSES, IMPACT AND AVENUES OF RESOLUTION Edited by Shambhu Ram Simkhada and Fabio Oliva Foreword by Daniel Warner Geneva, March 2006 Cover Pictures – clockwise from the top: 1) King Gyanendra of Nepal; 2) Madhav Kumar Nepal, leader of the CPN-UML Party; 3) A popular peace rally; 4) Girija Prasad Koirala, President of the Nepali Congress party; 5) The Maoist leadership; 6) The Maoist People’s Liberation Army (PLA); 7) A political rally of the Seven-party Alliance in Kathmandu; 8) Soldiers from Royal Nepal Army (RNA). This publication has been possible thanks to the financial support of the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), Bern, and is part of a larger project on the “Causes of Internal Conflicts and Means to Resolve Them: Nepal a Case Study” mandated and sponsored by the SDC in May 2003. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of the PSIO. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means - electronic, mechanical, photo-copying, recording or otherwise - without the prior permission of the Institut universitaire de hautes études internationales (HEI) Copyright 2006, IUHEI, CH-Geneva 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS __________________________________________________________________________________ LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................. 5 FOREWORD......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Project name: Project for Strenghtening National Rural Transport Program New Activities Loan: IDA-5336 & H8990 Modified Activities Procurement Plan Version: 2016-2 Canceled Activities Status: Approved Activities without Modification Date of Last Change of Status: 04/11/2015 Public Disclosure Authorized Category Works: Activities ShowHide Total days of End of No Objection Publication / No Objection to Contract (between Bid Contract Description Reference # Province/State Documents Invitation Bid Opening Evaluation of Bids Evaluation Report Signature Date Opening and (Completed) P.P. - Executing Agency: 2016-2-DOLIDAR - Method: NCB (National Competitive 5.Construction of Sandhikhark-Dharapani- SNRTP-22-NCB-O-SNRTP-ARG-W-NCB-1.05- Lumbini Zone N/A 01/02/14 03/03/14 18/03/14 N/A 10/05/14 68 11/05/15 Maidan Rd. (08 Km) UG-070-71 DTO Arghakhanchi Contract under execution Post Review N/A 15/03/14 14/04/14 15/05/14 N/A 11/07/14 88 Public Disclosure Authorized 6. Construction of Sandhikhark-Nuwakot- SNRTP-23-NCB-O-SNRTP-ARG-W-NCB-1.06- Lumbini Zone N/A 01/02/14 03/03/14 18/03/14 N/A 10/05/14 68 11/05/15 Asurkot-Pyuthan Rd. (07 Km): UG-070-71 DTO Arghakhanchi Contract under execution Post Review N/A 15/03/14 15/04/14 14/05/14 N/A 15/07/14 91 3. Construction of Mandredhunga – SNRTP-80-NCB-O-SNRTP-NUW-W-NCB-16.03-Bagmati Zone N/A 17/01/14 16/02/14 03/03/14 N/A 02/05/14 75 10/12/15 Khargabhanjyang-Gorsyang –Dangsing Road UG-070-71 (12.00 km) DTO Nuwakot Contract under execution Post Review N/A 04/03/14 06/04/14 14/05/14 N/A 30/05/14 54 1.
    [Show full text]
  • VIET-NAM REP. CD Io-I6.N Provinces Binh-Duong ...6S 4S Ninh-Thuan...10J 0 Quang-Tin...5S 3I
    Wktp cpUtm. S e t.: No. 11 - IS M ush 1974 - 9 4 — Reltvi iptdim. bcbtL: N* 11 - 15mA»lS74 DISEASES SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS — MALADIES SOUMISES AU RÈGLEMENT Notifications Received from 8 to 14 March 1974 — Notifications reçues du 8 au 14 mars 1974 ■ A na notified as infected on the date indicated — Zone notifiée comme I Imported cases — Cas importés infectée À la date donnée. p Preliminary figures — Chiffra préliminaires ... Figurai not yet received — Chiffres non encore disponibles C Cases — Cas r Revised figures — Chiffres révisés D Deaths — Décès j Suspected cases — Cas suspects City X (A) City X and the airport of that dty. means the city of Rangoon with its port and its airport, Rangoon (PA) Ville X (A) Ville X et l'aéroport de cette ville. signifie la ville de Rangoun avec son port et son aéroport. Ex.: City Y (P) City Y and the port of that dty. means the city of Karachi with its port (but without its airport), Karachi (P) (excl. A) Ville Y (P) Ville Y et le port de cette ville. signifie la ville de Karachi avec son port (mais sans son aéroport). PLAGUE — PESTE c D C D Asia — Asie MOZAMBIQUE (canid — suite) 24.n-2.III INDONESIA — INDONÉSIE 30.K-29XH C D Monica & Sofala District Jakarta Raya (Jawa) Province VIET-NAM REP. io-i6.n Deleg. S. Municipalities 6 0 Provinces Beira ...... j Jakarta Barat .... 17 1 Binh-Duong ..... 6s 4s 36s Is Jakarta Pusat (excl. C h im o io ................... 6 0 Ninh-Thuan.............. 10j 0 Kemayoran airport).
    [Show full text]