Why the Homage to Orwell?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why the Homage to Orwell? Why The Homage to Orwell? by LLOYD EDMONDS One of the most commonly prescribed men and massive military aid from nazi books for students of English literature has Germany and fascist Italy. The troops been George Orwell’s Homage to Catalonia. marshalled by the government on the various Educational authorities and others present fronts numbered over 600,000. this book, not only as literature, but as the The main countries all played some part in authority on the Spanish Civil War of 1936-39. the conflict. •. :ner openly, as in the case of Is this choice justified? And if not, why is it Germany, Italy and the Soviet Union, or promoted in this way? indirectly, or in an underhand way, as in the George Orwell served altogether about four case of the USA, Great Britain and France. months on the Aragon and Teruel fronts in Yet our students get as a definite statement Catalonia. On arrival in Barcelona,‘he enlisted of this Armageddon, a picture of a futile in a unit dominated by Anarchists and POUM- guerrilla skirmish. ists, had a brief excursion into the Aragon hills, fired a few shots, returned to Barcelona and, after a short stay there, returned to London. In the minds of the troops and the people of ' Because of the stalemate that had been the war zones in Central and Southern Spain, reached in the Aragon, he saw little fighting. Barcelona represented an oasis of By a mischance he was nearly killed in May recuperation and recreation where the rigors 1937 when a bullet went through his throat. and austerities of war could be forgotten for a time at least. In Central Spain, on the Madrid front, in Andalusia, in the Asturias, in the Basque The well-being was, of course, relative. country, large armies were locked in combat. Compared with Paris, Barcelona was austere; The insurgent generals, in addition to their in comparison with Madrid, it was the regular troops, recruited over 100,000 Moorish fleshpots. mercenaries in North Africa, and also received Madrid was very nearly isolated. It was WHY THE HOMAGE TO ORWELL? 13 linked by only one route with the rest of Spain. And in comparison with these three, As its food was all brought in on this one road - Orwell’s knowledge of Spain and the war is the Valencia road - the diet of the Madrileno obviously limited and deficient. was meagre and unvarying: salted cod, lentils, Orwell and Hemingway are two leading Mexican chick peas, and ersatz coffee - that figures in the world of letters. Both went to was it. Spain on the side of the Republic. Both wrote For nearly three years the living conditions books about the war and both books deal with of the Madrileno were like that. They suffered the exploits of a guerrilla band. However, while food shortage, actual danger and physical Hemingway’s work is a novel, a piece of restriction to a limited city area. imaginative literature, Orwell’s work is a political memoir. Barcelona was heavily bombed several times, but apart from that it survived the war Hemingway really knew Spain. Before the intact without becoming a battleground. war he had lived in Spain and he appreciated Barcelona had hundreds of square kilometres the Spanish way of life. He held this of farmland surrounding it - all of Catalonia. hispanismo so deeply that, on the defeat of the From it came a constant flow of fresh food. The Republic, he went to Cuba to live. There he many textile and clothing factories of witnessed another revolution. With the victory Barcelona operated throughout the war. Many of Fidel Castro, Hemingway continued to live of these, particularly the self-managing in Cuba, greatly to the satisfaction of the enterprises, had their own purchasing and Cubans. selling agents in France. Through these After May 1937, Orwell returned to England channels were brought food, clothing and to be lionised by the literary establishment. cigarettes, mainly for the employees of the Orwell had gone to Spain for the experience. factories, but some trickled out to the general His immediate and unremitting concern was to population. be a writer. He needed experiences and And of course there was the port. Despite concerns that he could transmute into the blockade, some ships were generally in the literature. harborand consumer goods dribbled through. Orwell kept aloof from his fellow soldiers. He shows no particular liking or interest in the The two cities felt the impact of the war, but individual Spaniard or Catalan who were his in one case it was extreme and in the other, comrades. The history of Catalonia, or of relatively mild. Spain, or the intricacies of the Spanish and Madrid never capitulated. It was betrayed in Catalan political scene were not his concerns. March 1939 by a clique of officers headed by Hemingway, on the contrary was in Spain Colonel Casado. because he was a partisan on the side of the Franco’s troops marched into Barcelona Spanish people. He loved their individualism, early in February 1939 and the city was vigor and distinctiveness. His ear for their surrendered without a shot being fired. conversation and their thoughts is portrayed in his description of the members of the If the two cities are compared for their war guerrilla band. In sharp contrast to Orwell’s records, their devotion to democratic ideals qualified war effort, sense of futility and self­ and constancy to the Republican government, recrimination is Hemingway’s whole-hearted then Madrid deserves the honor and the glory. commitment, optimism and vigor. Truly heroic Madrid! Yet Orwell pays his homage to Catalonia. Hemingway had no doubts. Every talent and There is no lack of material on the Spanish asset he had, he devoted to the cause of the Civil War. On the contrary, a veritable spate of Republic - his writing skills and literary renown, his contacts with influential people, novels, poems, anthologies, histories, pamphlets and films deal directly with the war. his personal income. He risked his life beyond Writers of the eminence of Andre Malraux in the call of his journalistic duties. France, Jose Maria Gironella in Spain and He saw as clearly as did Orwell, cruelty, Ernest Hemingway - to name three from inefficiency and political manoeuvring. But different countries - have written major novels paramount, over-riding these, was the with the Spanish Civil War as the dominant necessity to defeat the resurgent forces of motif. reactionary Spain. 14 AuS I RALIAN LEFT REVIEW No. 54 W ar To many people, especially those In contrast to Orwells desultory excursion concerned with the onward march of the in Homage to Catalonia, the band of guerrillas fascist rt^m es, Spain was the scene of over­ in H em ingw ay’s book For Whom the Bell Tolls riding importance in this struggle. has a positive role to play in the war They are part of an offensive by the Republican Army. And it is extraordinary that this struggle They are to blow up a bridge so as to disrupt should so often be presented as a story of one the communications of Franco’s forces - an man's episodic and brief stay in one region of exploit integral to the strategic plan of the Spain It is extraordinary because of the battle Republicans. of the Spanish people against the military coup of Franco, although it had aspects Orwell’s centuria makes its excursion into peculiar to Spain and arising from Spanish the hills of the Aragon with no aim. with no history, was generally regarded as part of the purpose. Its members are apparently actuated defence of democracy against fascism. This by a consciousness of their inactivity in defence became Europe-wide, then world­ Barcelona and by a vague hope that what they wide, with World War II. do may be of some use. Orwell says of himself: “I was sick of the inaction on the Aragon front Why, then, homage to Catalonia? and chiefly conscious that I had not done my It was not Catalonia. The attraction to Orwell share of the fighting. I used to think of the was the Anarchists and their allies, whose base recruiting poster in Barcelona which was Barcelona. demanded accusingly of passers-by ‘What have you done for democracy’ and feel I could Their philosophy, their methods of only answer ‘I have drawn my rations’ .... And, organisation, or lack of organisation, their of course, I wanted to go to Madrid. Everyone more primitive style of life - these are the in the A rm y whatever his political views always factors which appealed to Orwell. A more wanted to go to Madrid.” appropriate title for his book would possibly have been "Homage to Spanish Anarchism”. Why didn’t they go to Madrid? There was nothing to stop them. John Cornford, a The Anarchists figured prominently during communist and a poet who also served with the Spanish Civil War period. It is different the POUM in Barcelona went to Madrid. He today. Summarising from a study of the was killed there. underground workers’ parties in Spain today in an inform ed article in The Economist of When staying in Madrid, Hemingway had a January 28, 1976, the prevailing trend among room at the leading hotel in the city, the the Spanish workers is towards socialism. Of Florida. The main buildings of Madrid were the trade unionists, about half are influenced regularly shelled by Franco’s artillery, among by the communists and a third by the them the Hotel Florida. So Hemingway socialists. The article specifically states “The became a collector of shell fragments.
Recommended publications
  • Cuban Antifascism and the Spanish Civil War: Transnational Activism, Networks, and Solidarity in the 1930S
    Cuban Antifascism and the Spanish Civil War: Transnational Activism, Networks, and Solidarity in the 1930s Ariel Mae Lambe Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Ariel Mae Lambe All rights reserved ABSTRACT Cuban Antifascism and the Spanish Civil War: Transnational Activism, Networks, and Solidarity in the 1930s Ariel Mae Lambe This dissertation shows that during the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) diverse Cubans organized to support the Spanish Second Republic, overcoming differences to coalesce around a movement they defined as antifascism. Hundreds of Cuban volunteers—more than from any other Latin American country—traveled to Spain to fight for the Republic in both the International Brigades and the regular Republican forces, to provide medical care, and to serve in other support roles; children, women, and men back home worked together to raise substantial monetary and material aid for Spanish children during the war; and longstanding groups on the island including black associations, Freemasons, anarchists, and the Communist Party leveraged organizational and publishing resources to raise awareness, garner support, fund, and otherwise assist the cause. The dissertation studies Cuban antifascist individuals, campaigns, organizations, and networks operating transnationally to help the Spanish Republic, contextualizing these efforts in Cuba’s internal struggles of the 1930s. It argues that both transnational solidarity and domestic concerns defined Cuban antifascism. First, Cubans confronting crises of democracy at home and in Spain believed fascism threatened them directly. Citing examples in Ethiopia, China, Europe, and Latin America, Cuban antifascists—like many others—feared a worldwide menace posed by fascism’s spread.
    [Show full text]
  • The Communist Party of Spain (Marxist-Leninist)
    Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line * Spain The Communist Party of Spain (Marxist-Leninist) Communist Party of Spain Marxist-Leninist Is Founded Chronology of the Extraordinary Congress of the CEOC First Published: 2007 Transcription, Editing and Markup: Sam Richards and Paul Saba Copyright: This work is in the Public Domain under the Creative Commons Common Deed. You can freely copy, distribute and display this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit the Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line as your source, include the url to this work, and note any of the transcribers, editors & proofreaders above. Communist Party of Spain Marxist-Leninist Is Founded Chronology of the Extraordinary Congress of the CEOC On October 21 and 22 2006, we the communists of the now dissolved organisation CEOC [State Committee of Communist Organisations]* underwent a memorable moment, both for the historic significance of this political step as well as for the possibilities and challenges that are now opened. This is a chronological-summary of these historic days. Saturday October 21 Morning The day began precisely at 10 AM. The comrades designated by the former Permanent Committee of the CEOC called on the comrades who would preside over the Congress, represented in an equal manner by members of the former organizations of the CEOC and by a comrade representing the International Conference of Marxist-Leninist Parties and Organisations (ICMLPO), a conference that groups our fraternal Parties. The composition of the round table of the Congress was ratified unanimously by the plenary of the delegates. The Round Table opened the Congress by first proposing the name of the Party, which was approved by acclamation: PCE (M-L), Communist Party of Spain (Marxist-Leninist).
    [Show full text]
  • Workers Power and the Spanish Revolution
    Workers Power and the Spanish Revolution In Spain’s national elections in February Each sindicato unico had “sections” that of 1936, a repressive right-wing government had their own assemblies and elected shop was swept out of office and replaced by a stewards (delegados). In manufacturing coalition of liberals and socialists. Taking industries like textile or metalworking, advantage of a less repressive environment, there was a “section” for each firm or plant. Spain’s workers propelled the largest strike In the construction industry, the “sections” wave in Spanish history, with dozens of corresponded to the various crafts. All of the citywide general strikes and hundreds of autonomous industrial unions in a city or partial strikes. By the end of June a million county (comarca) were grouped together into workers were out on strike. a local labor council (federación local). Barely a month after the election, the Land The unions were part of a larger context of Workers Federation led 80,000 landless laborers movement institutions. The libertarian Left in Spain into a seizure of three thousand farms in the also organized alternative schools and an extensive “Spanish Siberia” — the poverty-stricken region of network of ateneos — storefront community Estremadura1. With the country at a high pitch of centers. The ateneos were centers for debates, debate over its future, political polarization was cultural events, literacy classes (between 30 and 50 punctuated by tit-for-tat killings of Right and Left percent of the population was illiterate in the ‘30s), activists. With right-wing politicians openly calling and so on. A characteristic idea of Spanish for an army takeover, the widely anticipated army anarchism was the empowerment of ordinary coup began in Spain on July 19th.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Organizational Developments in Spanish Anti-Revisionism
    Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line * Spain Overview of Page | 1 organisational developments First Published: May 2019 Transcription, Editing and Markup: Sam Richards and Paul Saba Copyright: This work is in the Public Domain under the Creative Commons Common Deed. You can freely copy, distribute and display this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit the Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line as your source, include the url to this work, and note any of the transcribers, editors & proofreaders above. In 1963 the first anti-revisionists Marxist-Leninist organisations arose, and after that, various others developed either through subsequent splits or by indirect or direct routes, not least the student movement and catholic circles influenced by Marxism. Like elsewhere in Europe, inspired by the Sino-Soviet Polemic and later the Cultural Revolution, there was an organisational rupture, a separation from the revisionist party, but how much of a political, ideological and organisational rupture was there? The proliferation of small militants groups1, and an inability to rally a stable recognised leadership that could command allegiance amongst the various trends saw unresolved ideological concerns engendered criticism and splits that were never resolved in any organisation that could act as, rather than proclaim itself, the successor of the PCE. Spanish anti-revisionists operated under a repressive authoritarian regime headed by Franco whose military coup had overthrown the Spanish republic. It was a heroic struggle in a regime noted for its anti-communist repression and police killing demonstrating workers in the streets, generating an armed response of differing intensity and effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • PROOF Contents
    PROOF Contents Acknowledgements viii 1 Survival and Renewal: The 1990s 1 2 Regroupment: Establishing a European Movement 29 3 The Party of the European Left 46 4 Diverse Trends: An Overview 66 5 A Successful Model? Die Linke (the Left Party – Germany) 83 6 How Have the Mighty Fallen: Partito della Rifondazione Comunista (Party of Communist Refoundation – Italy) 99 7 Back from the Brink: French Communism (Parti Communiste Français) Re-orientates 116 8 Communism Renewed and Supported: The Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia (the Czech Republic) 132 9 The Scandinavian Left 147 10 The European Left and the Global Left: 1999–2009 163 Notes 192 Index 204 vii PROOF 1 Survival and Renewal: The 1990s Almost two decades after the fall of the Berlin Wall, on the occasion of the German federal elections in September 2009, the International Herald Tribune marked the electoral victory of the German right with the headline, ‘Is socialism dying?’1 The German Social Democratic Party or the Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (SPD) took 23% of the votes – its lowest poll since the Second World War – just months after the European elections registered a poor performance from left- wing candidates across the European Union (EU). As the article went on to observe, ‘Even in the midst of one of the greatest challenges to capitalism in 75 years, involving a breakdown of the financial sys- tem because of “irrational exuberance”, greed and the weakness of regulatory systems, European socialists and their leftist cousins have not found a compelling response, let alone taken advantage of the failures of the right.’ There is no doubt that across Europe the failure of the social demo- cratic parties to present a ‘compelling response’ to the economic crisis has led to a wave of electoral setbacks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Popular Front: Roadblock to Revolution
    Internationalist Group League for th,e Fourth International The Popular Front: Roadblock to Revolution Volunteers from the anarcho-syndicalist CNT and POUM militias head to the front against Franco's forces in Spanish Civil War, Barcelona, September 1936. The bourgeois Popular Front government defended capitalist property, dissolved workers' militias and blocked the road to revolution. Internationalist Group Class Readings May 2007 $2 ® <f$l~ 1162-M Introduction The question of the popular front is one of the defining issues in our epoch that sharply counterpose the revolution­ ary Marxism of Leon Trotsky to the opportunist maneuverings of the Stalinists and social democrats. Consequently, study of the popular front is indispensable for all those who seek to play a role in sweeping away capitalism - a system that has brought with it untold poverty, racial, ethnic, national and sexual oppression and endless war - and opening the road to a socialist future. "In sum, the People's Front is a bloc of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat," Trotsky wrote in December 1937 in re­ sponse to questions from the French magazine Marianne. Trotsky noted: "When two forces tend in opposite directions, the diagonal of the parallelogram approaches zero. This is exactly the graphic formula of a People's Front govern­ ment." As a bloc, a political coalition, the popular (or people's) front is not merely a matter of policy, but of organization. Opportunists regularly pursue class-collaborationist policies, tailing after one or another bourgeois or petty-bourgeois force. But it is in moments of crisis or acute struggle that they find it necessary to organizationally chain the working class and other oppressed groups to the class enemy (or a sector of it).
    [Show full text]
  • Ibmtnewsletter
    IBMT Newsletter www.international-brigades.org.uk Issue 41 / 1-2016 INTERNATIONAL BRIGADE MEMORIAL TRUST Saturda y 12 March 2016 from 11am-5pm at the Manchester Conference Centre, 78 Sackville St, Manchester M1 3BB Professor Paul Preston Fees and booking WOMEN Pasionaria of steel: the life of G £15 including buffet lunch (payment Dolores Ibárruri by 28 February) & G £10 entrance only (payment on Professor Helen Graham the day) THE G Send cheques payable to IBMT SPANI SH Wars of development: to: Charles Jepson, Aysgaard, Margaret Michaelis’s images Beardwood Brow, Blackburn BB2 7AT of 1930s Barcelona (no receipts will be sent); or pay online via PayPal: [www.international- CIVIL WAR Dr Sylv ia Mart in brigades.org.uk/catalog/ Aileen Palmer and the British conferencestalks]; queries: [clarioncc International Brigade Medical Unit: ‘our secretary, @yahoo. co.uk] 01254 51302 Memorial Trust our interpreter, our dogsbody’ Further information 2016 Len Crome Dr Linda Palfreeman G Dolores Long: [doloreslong@ fastmail. fm] 0161 226 2013 Memorial Conference Fernanda Jacobsen: G Hilary Jones: [hilary.m.jones@ www.international-brigades.org.uk Samaritan or spy? btinternet.com] 01625 527 540 NEWS r e e t a M l l a h s r a M : o t o h p r e v o C Issue 41 / 1-2016 Cover story Stained glass window unveiled in Belfast City Hall: pages 11-12 3-6 & 8 News Including report from the IBMT’s Annual General Meeting in Aberdeen 7 Letter from Spain Justin Byrne writes from Madrid GLASGOW GATHERING: Anti-fascist campaigners from Hope not Hate held a commemoration for the International 9-10 Secretarial notes Brigades on 19 September at the Pasionaria memorial overlooking the Clyde in Glasgow.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Intervention in the Spanish Civil War: Review Article
    Ronald Radosh Sevostianov, Mary R. Habeck, eds. Grigory. Spain Betrayed: The Soviet Union in the Spanish Civil War. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001. xxx + 537 pp. $35.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-300-08981-3. Reviewed by Robert Whealey Published on H-Diplo (March, 2002) Soviet Intervention in the Spanish Civil War: the eighty-one published documents were ad‐ Review Article dressed to him. Stalin was sent at least ten. Stalin, [The Spanish language uses diacritical marks. the real head of the Soviet Union, made one direct US-ASCII will not display them. Some words, order to the Spanish government, on the conser‐ therefore, are written incompletely in this re‐ vative side. After the bombing of the pocket bat‐ view] tleship Deutschland on 29 May 1937 (which en‐ raged Hitler), Stalin said that the Spanish Republi‐ This collection is actually two books wrapped can air force should not bomb German or Italian in a single cover: a book of Soviet documents pre‐ vessels. (Doc 55.) sumably chosen in Moscow by Grigory Sevos‐ tianov and mostly translated by Mary Habeck. From reading Radosh's inadequate table of Then the Soviet intervention in Spain is narrated contents, it is not easy to discover casually a co‐ and interpreted by the well-known American his‐ herent picture of what the Soviets knew and were torian Ronald Radosh. Spain Betrayed is a recent saying during the civil war. Archival information addition to the continuing Yale series, "Annals of tends to get buried in the footnotes and essays Communism," edited with the cooperation of Rus‐ scattered throughout the book, and there is no sian scholars in Moscow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Popular Fronts and the Civil War in Spain Tim Rees
    10 The Popular Fronts and the Civil War in Spain tim rees Our desire is that all the organizations of the Popular Front be strengthened. Our desire is that all anti-fascist forces be consolidated, wherever they are to be found. Although I know that this can lead to criticism of our position, of our actions, never, never, can it be said that a single member, not a one, has been attracted to the party by the promise of advancement or the lure of personal 1 gain. These words were spoken as part of a rousing closing speech made by Jesús Hernández, a leading figure in the Spanish Communist Party (PCE), at a party plenum held in March 1937. At the time Spain was nine months into its brutal civil war which raged on until the final defeat of the republican side at the hands of General Franco’s Nationalists in April 1939.Theplenum was held partly to publicize the growing strength of the communist party but its central theme, echoed by all the speakers present, was to extol support for the Popular Front as an alliance of all the political parties and trade unions that supported the republic. In evoking the idea of the Popular Front, and the language of anti-fascism which accompanied it, the PCE was following policies common to the international communist movement. In the context of the war in Spain, Hernández hammered home the message that cooperation was the key to ultimate victory and that the PCE was providing a selfless example in working toward that common goal, all of which was reflected in the title of his speech: “Everything Within the Popular Front.” This plenum, and another held in November 1937, presented the PCE as not just at the heart of the conflict in Spain but as part of a worldwide struggle being led by the international communist movement against the threat of 1 Partido Comunista de España, Todo dentro del Frente Popular (Valencia: Ediciones del Partido Comunista de España, 1937).
    [Show full text]
  • The Spanish Civil War (1936–39)
    12 CIVIL WAR CASE STUDY 1: THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR (1936–39) ‘A civil war is not a war but a sickness,’ wrote Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. ‘The enemy is within. One fights almost against oneself.’ Yet Spain’s tragedy in 1936 was even greater. It had become enmeshed in the international civil war, which started in earnest with the Bolshevik revolution. From Antony Beevor, The Battle for Spain: The Spanish Civil War 1936–1939 , 2006 The Spanish Civil War broke out in 1936 after more than a century of social, economic and political division. Half a million people died in this conflict between 1936 and 1939. As you read through this chapter, consider the following essay questions: Ģ Why did a civil war break out in Spain in 1936? Ģ How significant was the impact of foreign involvement on the outcome of the Spanish Civil War? General Francisco Franco, the Ģ What were the key effects of the Spanish Civil War? leader who took Nationalist forces to victory in the Spanish Civil War. Timeline of events – 1820–1931 1820 The Spanish Army, supported by liberals, overthrows the absolute monarchy and makes Spain a constitutional monarchy in a modernizing revolution 1821 Absolute monarchy is restored to Spain by French forces in an attempt to reinstate the old order 1833 In an attempt to prevent a female succession following the death of King Ferdinand, there is a revolt by ‘Carlists’. The army intervenes to defeat the Carlists, who nevertheless remain a strong conservative force in Spanish politics (see Interesting Facts box) 1833–69 The army’s influence in national politics increases during the ‘rule of the Queens’ 1869–70 Anarchist revolts take place against the state 1870–71 The monarchy is overthrown and the First Republic is established 1871 The army restores a constitutional monarchy 1875–1918 During this period the constitutional monarchy allows for democratic elections.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of Foreign Public Opinion in the Spanish Civil War: Motives, Methods, and Effectiveness
    The Formation of Foreign Public Opinion in the Spanish Civil War: Motives, Methods, and Effectiveness Author: Stuart T Leslie Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/383 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2004 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. BOSTON COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY The Formation of Foreign Public Opinion in the Spanish Civil War: Motives, Methods, and Success By Stuart Leslie HONORS THESIS APRIL 2004 ADVISER: Pr. James Cronin Table of Conte nts I. Who Will Write? 1 II. The Case from Burgos 9 III . The Case from Madrid 33 IV. History’s Verdict 59 V. Bibliography 73 Who Will Write? While victors generally disagree, common wisdom holds that it is they who wri te the history. The Spanish Civil War, however, had no conclusive winner. While Francisco Franco ousted his opponents and clung to power for nearly four decades after the end of hostility, the international movement for which he stood was discredited within six years. Following their military defeat, Franco’s enemies moved into exile and became the heroes of anti -Fascism when it had become a universal value. While Franco controlled the archives and presses in Spain, his enemies could not be silenced. Though the military phase of the war ended in 1939, the fight for ‘hearts and minds’ continued for decades. Ironically, when the Caudillo finally died in 1975, the people of Spain tacitly agreed to a pacto de olviedo (pact of forgetfulness), ignoring the legacy of the war, and Franco, entirely.
    [Show full text]
  • Comintern and the Spanish Civil War in Spain
    COMINTERN AND THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR IN SPAIN Svetlana Pozharskaya Institute of Universal History of the Russia Academy of Sciencies Resumen El art´ıculo se preocupa por la influencia del Comintern en la denominada Revolucion´ espanola.˜ La autora expone el papel desempenado˜ por la Comintern en la internacionalizacion´ del conflicto espanol.˜ La intervencion´ pol´ıtica de Stalin en Espana˜ no fue solo´ motivada por la ideolog´ıa sino que tambien´ influyo´ el miedo a la amenaza del nazismo en Europa. Por este motivo, como argumenta la autora, la contribucion´ del Comintern en la Guerra Civil espanolanos˜ olo´ fue pol´ıtica sino tambien´ de apoyo militar a la causa republicana mediante voluntarios, armas y municiones. Palabras clave: Comintern, Stalin, Brigadas Internacionales, Pol´ıtica europea. MAIG 2003 Abstract 47 This article focuses the influence of the Comintern in the so-called Spanish Revolution. The author talks about the part payed by the Comintern in order to make Spanish conflict international. The Stalin’s policy in Spain was not only for idealism but for fear of the Nazi regime threat in Europe. For this reason, as the author argues, the participation of the Comintern into Spanish Civil War was not only political but military support to the Republican cause —volunteers, weapons and ammunition. EBRE 38 Keywords: Comintern, Stalin, International Brigades, European politics. Ebre 38. -N´um. 1, pp. 47-56 Revista Internacional de la Guerra Civil (1936-1939) Civil wars were familiar to Spain not only in its influence was essentialy less than that of the the 20th century. Thus, throughout the 19th Spanish Socialist Working Party and the weight century the country was twice involved in the of its trade-union centre subdued to the weight internal armed conflicts of the oppositioning of the Anarcho-Syndicalist National Labour Con- parties protecting the right to have their own fideration and General Union of the Workers.
    [Show full text]