DOCSLIB.ORG

Northern Expresswaynorthern Non-Aboriginal Heritage Technical Paper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northern Expresswaynorthern Non-Aboriginal Heritage Technical Paper northern expressway environmental report non-aboriginal heritage technical paper NON-ABORIGINAL HERITAGE TECHNICAL PAPER NON-ABORIGINAL HERITAGE Northern Expressway Non-Aboriginal Heritage Technical Paper 28 February 2007 Prepared by: QED Pty Ltd 309 Angas Street Adelaide SA 5000 Telephone: + 61 8 8227 0188 Facsimile: + 61 8 8227 0271 Prepared for: Department for Transport, Energy and Infrastructure 33–37 Warwick Street Walkerville SA 5081 PO Box 1 Walkerville SA 5081 Telephone: 1300 658 621 Facsimile: + 61 8 8343 2005 Email: [email protected] © Kellogg Brown & Root Pty Ltd, 2007 Limitations Statement The sole purpose of this report and the associated services performed by Kellogg Brown & Root Pty Ltd (KBR) either directly or through its associates, Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd (SKM) and QED Pty Ltd (QED), is to document the effect on non-Aboriginal heritage of the Northern Expressway in accordance with the scope of services set out in contract reference 05C152 between KBR and the Department for Transport, Energy and Infrastructure (DTEI) (‘the Client’). That scope of services was defined by the requests of the Client, by the time and budgetary constraints imposed by the Client, and by the availability of access to the site. KBR derived the data in this report primarily from various heritage registers, the references listed in this report, site inspections from public land, and through consultation with DTEI. The passage of time, manifestation of latent conditions or impacts of future events may require further exploration at the site and subsequent data analysis, and re-evaluation of the findings, observations and conclusions expressed in this report. In preparing this report, KBR has relied upon and presumed accurate certain information (or absence thereof) relative to the site provided by the Client and others identified herein. Except as otherwise stated in the report, KBR has not attempted to verify the accuracy or completeness of any such information. No warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied, is made with respect to the data reported or to the findings, observations and conclusions expressed in this report. Furthermore, such data, findings, observations and conclusions are based solely upon information supplied by the Client in existence at the time of the investigation. This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of the Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between KBR and the Client. KBR accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Revision History Signatures Revision Date Comment Originated Checked Authorised by by by 0 15/12/06 AEC517.003-U-REP-004 MOC TKB MEJ Issue for client review 1 28/02/07 AEC517.003-U-REP-004 MOC TKB MEJ Issue for use Table of Contents Executive Summary I 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Project description 1 1.2 Topic explanation 2 1.3 Legislative and policy requirements 2 2 Existing environment 7 2.1 Early European history of the region 7 2.2 Registered sites 8 3 Effects of project upon existing non-Aboriginal heritage 11 3.1 Overview 11 3.2 Heritage places affected 11 3.2.1 Bunker, Gawler Airport and Racecourse, Two Wells Road and Main North Road GAWLER 11 3.2.2 Farmhouse 'Birribi', Lot 2 Wingate Road HILLIER 11 3.2.3 House 'Tudor Vale', Lot 2 Curtis Road MUNNO PARA WEST 14 3.2.4 Buildings No. 29 and 33, Smithfield Magazine Area, Andrews Road MACDONALD PARK 14 3.2.5 Dwelling – pisé cottage and brick well, Petherton Road PENFIELD 14 3.2.6 Zoar Cemetery, Lot 347 Argent Road PENFIELD 14 3.2.7 House 'Calvin Grove', Lot 76 Taylors Road VIRGINIA 14 4 Environmental management 15 4.1 Principles adopted to minimise effects 15 4.2 Measures to minimise effects during planning and design 15 4.3 Measures to minimise effects during construction 15 4.4 Measures to minimise effects post-construction 16 4.5 Specific measures for heritage places 16 4.5.1 Bunker, Gawler Airport and Racecourse (as per listing in Register) 16 4.5.2 Farmhouse 'Birribi' 17 4.5.3 House 'Tudor Vale' 17 4.5.4 Buildings No. 29 and 33, Smithfield Magazine Area 17 4.5.5 Dwelling – pisé cottage and brick well 17 4.5.6 Zoar Cemetery 17 4.5.7 House 'Calvin Grove' 18 5 Conclusion 19 6 References 21 v List of figures Figure 1.1 Study area 3 Figure 1.2 Northern Expressway and surrounding road network 5 Figure 3.1 Location of affected heritage places in the study area 13 List of tables Table 2.1 Registered sites in the Northern Expressway study area 9 Table 3.1 Summary of heritage sites affected by the Northern Expressway 12 Table 4.1 Summary of recommended mitigation measures for significantly affected heritage places 16 Attachments Attachment A Property details: Northern Expressway Heritage Survey vi List of abbreviations DTEI Department for Transport, Energy and Infrastructure Glossary Word Definition Australian Heritage Places A cooperative project between the Commonwealth, State and Territory Inventory governments where details of heritage places are recorded and can be searched Development approval A process outlined in the Development Act 1993 whereby proposed development is required to be consented to by either a local council or state government development assessment panel/commission Development Plan A document established by the Development Act 1993 that guides development. Each of the local councils has their own Development Plan for their area Heritage Place A place of heritage significance National Estate A place of heritage significance recorded on the Commonwealth National Significance Estate Register Non-Aboriginal heritage Heritage that is not associated with Aboriginal peoples. This is often also referred to as European heritage Places of heritage Items assessed under National Estate, Heritage Act or Development Act significance as a heritage place of significance South Australian Heritage A list of places of heritage value to the State Register vii viii Executive summary Several heritage places exist within the Northern Expressway study area. The purpose of this report is to identify heritage places that may be affected by the Expressway, assess the effect and advise on the principles and management measures that may be adopted to minimise such effects. A desktop review was undertaken to identify heritage places within 1 km of the proposed route. This review incorporated the data provided by Planning SA, and was supplemented by council development plans, council heritage surveys and data from the Australian Heritage Places Inventory. The heritage places were then assessed in terms of how the Expressway would affect them. Some heritage places were clearly not likely to be affected either due to distance or land topography between the heritage place and proposed route. Generally the heritage values of places further than 500 m from the route were considered not to be affected by the proposal. Those sites potentially affected were inspected from public land as part of the site visit. It was considered that twenty heritage places were likely to be affected with only seven of these places expected to have a level of effect greater than minor. The Local Heritage Places are: Bunker, Gawler Airport and Racecourse, Gawler Farmhouse ‘Birribi’, Wingate Road, Hillier House ‘Tudor Vale’, Curtis Road, Munno Para West Zoar Cemetery, Argent Road, Penfield. The State Heritage Places are: Buildings No. 29 and 33, Smithfield Magazine Area, Andrews Road, MacDonald Park Dwelling - pisé cottage and brick well, Petherton Road, Penfield. A discussion of the potential effects and suggested mitigation measures for these seven heritage places is provided in this report. General principles to protect the heritage values of heritage places in the area are identified including the early identification of heritage places (completed) and the development of management plans for affected places to ensure adverse effects are minimised. It is considered that while some heritage places will be affected by the Expressway, these effects can be minimised through appropriate management without compromising the essential integrity of the heritage place. The exceptions, all of which are significantly affected, are: 1. Smithfield Magazine Area at MacDonald Park 2. Gawler glider field 3. House ‘Tudor Vale’, Curtis Road, Munno Para West. I II 1 Introduction The proposed Northern Expressway project including the Port Wakefield Road Upgrade was developed from a planning and concept design process that considered a number of options. The final configuration of the Northern Expressway proposal, its construction method, and its environmental management during construction and operation may vary from the project described, however the project constraints, design principles and standards described in the Environmental Report would remain largely the same. 1.1 Project description The proposed Northern Expressway, and the Port Wakefield Road upgrade, will form part of the AusLink National Network, replacing the increasingly congested Main North Road thereby providing road safety and amenity benefits. The Port Wakefield Road component involves the upgrade of the existing National Network road link that connects the Northern Expressway and the Port River Expressway. The proposed Northern Expressway between Gawler to Port Wakefield Road will provide significant State and regional benefits. It is primarily aimed at improving access to Adelaide for freight transport via the Sturt Highway, including freight for export from key areas such as the Barossa Valley wine producing area and the Riverland wine and citrus producing area. Together with the Port River Expressway, it will provide a high standard link between the Sturt Highway at Gawler and the Port of Adelaide, South Australia’s main shipping port. It will maximise the opportunity for freight transport to gain access to producers, transport hubs, freight gateways and markets, achieve better delivery times and increase cost efficiency to gain a competitive edge, while improving safety significantly.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 16131 New Connections 6 Ƒ R.Indd
    ISSUE 6 WINTER 2010 onwards and upwards The Glenelg tramline is realising its potential as part of a rejuvenated public transport network for Adelaide following the realisation of two major milestones on its journey coast to coast. > Gallipoli Underpass see page 7. Project Director, Manuel Delgado said a sense of history came with seeing the fi rst trams run between the city and the Adelaide inside this issue Entertainment Centre. “We had a great response during the Adelaide > coast to coast light rail Entertainment Centre’s open day earlier this year > glenelg tram overpass when more than 2,500 people took the chance to ride on the extended tramline for the fi rst time. > gallipoli underpass “Since the start of timetabled services, on the 22nd > south road superway of March this year, we’ve had a steady increase in patronage and usage of the Park and Ride facility. > northern expressway “We’ve also seen the trams service a big concert like Lady GaGa and Asian Champions League > rail revitalisation football at Hindmarsh Stadium, which is great.” > seaford rail extension see page 6 www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au Winter 2010 1 by Hook contents We’ve all been horrifi ed by deaths rail revitalisation and serious injuries p11 on our roads in gawler the fi rst half of 2010 and we all have a responsibility to address the issue. northern p8-9 Delivering a road safety benefi t is a key strategy expressway behind all of the major projects underway in and around Adelaide. rail revitalisation dry creek Often road safety is among the primary p12 rail car depot motivators for building new or improved roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Impact Assessment
    APPENDIX Q9 Traffic impact assessment See attached Traffic Impact Assessment Report prepared by Arup. Olympic Dam Expansion Draft Environmental Impact Statement 2009 Appendix Q 165 BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Expansion Environmental Impact Statement Traffic Impact Assessment BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Expansion Environmental Impact Statement Traffic Impact Assessment October 2008 Arup This report takes into account the Arup Pty Ltd ABN 18 000 966 165 particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no Arup responsibility is undertaken to any third Level 17 1 Nicholson Street, party Melbourne VIC 3000 Tel +61 3 9668 5500 Fax +61 3 9663 1546 www.arup.com Job number 085200/01 BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Expansion Environmental Impact Statement Traffic Impact Assessment Contents Page Executive Summary i 1 Introduction 1 2 Existing Conditions 5 2.1 Road Network 5 2.2 Road Classification, Responsibilities and Policies 5 2.3 Road Environment 7 2.4 Traffic Data 13 2.5 Baseline Traffic Flows 19 2.6 Future Road Network Improvements 21 2.7 Rail Network 23 2.8 Rail Operations 25 2.9 Crash Analysis 26 3 Proposed Olympic Dam Expansion 32 3.1 Overview 32 3.2 Olympic Dam Site Expansion Heavy Vehicles AADT 33 3.3 Ancillary Traffic AADT 39 3.4 Total AADT 43 3.5 Traffic Movements Between Townships and Olympic Dam 54 3.6 Road Link Level of Service - Impact 60 3.7 Key Intersections, Peak Hour Traffic and Impacts 64 3.8 Over-Dimensional Load Movements and Impacts 66 3.9 Road Safety 81
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Gordon [PDF 359KB]
    The Federal Redistribution 2011 South Australia • t; Public Suggestion Number 1 Martin Gordon 8 pages 86 Companion Crescent Flynn ACT 2615 [email protected] 02-62589372 The Redistribution Committee for South Australia Dear Members, Redistribution of Federal Electoral Boundaries in South Australia I have a whole of state redistribution proposal for South Australia. The population differences between the 11 existing divisions are not significantly out of kilter with the current average enrolment and tolerances. Comparatively minor changes I suggest are necessary to bring all the divisions within tolerance in 2015. The nature ofthe changes I have proposed are consistent with economics, social and regional community of interests; communications and travel within the divisions; physical features and existing boundaries. I have provided comments in relation to each division and have compiled the changes into a table which demonstrates they are all well within tolerances in 2015. Grey The existing division is slightly below average enrolment at 100,095 electors. It is growing at nearly the state average electors growth over the next four years (4.02% versus 4.09%). I have proposed no change to the boundaries and the projected enrolments for 2015 will remain at 104,118 or 99.39% of projected average enrolment at that time. Both adjoining divisions of Wakefield and Barker are above quota and any changes to their boundaries can be applied to remedy elector shortfalls in other divisions. Barker The existing division is well above quota and its growth rate is also above the state­ wide average (4.41 % versus 4.09%), and shedding several thousand electors to Wakefield between Gawler and the Barossa, the principal localities are Lyndoch and Sandy Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Connector FACT SHEET July 2008
    northern connector FACT SHEET July 2008 Involved at this early stage are a wide range The planning study will include an economic Have your of government agencies, local businesses and analysis and identify relevant environmental community bodies that need to understand issues and outline an approach for design and and comment on the proposal and to raise construction. It will also provide the framework say about a any issues about it. for an environmental impact assessment to be developed throughout this year. Since the announcement in March 2008 a major project range of activities have occurred, including: The project route is expected to be confirmed > feedback on design based on traffic needs by the end of 2009. Five months ago the Minister for Transport, and engineering Patrick Conlon announced a study into a > desktop research on similar projects Where is the project? new road and rail transport corridor in the > drop-in forums held at Globe Derby Park The planning study area will investigate area west of Port Wakefield Road – the and St Kilda a 17 km corridor from north of the Brown Northern Connector. > shopping centre displays at Hollywood Road/Port Wakefield Road intersection through to the connection of the Port River This fact sheet sets out additional Plaza and Virginia Expressway and South Road. information about the project and identifies > meeting and planning with emergency the opportunities for the community to services experts This includes a section of approximately be involved in the planning process that > field surveys that look at geography, 1 km width on the western side of is underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Justification and Benefits of the Northern Expressway and Port Wakefield Road Upgrade
    northernexpressway environmental report B Part B. Need for the Proposal and Consideration of Alternatives 4. Justifi cation and benefi ts of the Northern Expressway and Port Wakefi eld Road Upgrade 4-1 5. Alternative routes considered and the selected route 5-1 6. Economic and fi nancial assessment 6-1 Northern Expressway Environmental Report 4 Justification and benefits of the Northern Expressway and Port Wakefield Road Upgrade 4.1 Introduction The proposed Northern Expressway and Port Wakefield Road Upgrade will provide significant State and regional benefits, in particular by improving access to Adelaide for freight transport via the Sturt Highway, including freight for export from key areas such as the Barossa Valley wine producing area and the Riverland wine and citrus producing area. Together with the Port River Expressway, it will provide a high standard link between the Sturt Highway at Gawler and the Port of Adelaide, South Australia’s main shipping port. It will remove much heavy freight traffic from Main North Road, Angle Vale Road and Heaslip Road, lessening congestion and improving safety for urban traffic in the northern suburbs. 4.1.1 Background Part A outlined the various studies undertaken that justify the need for the Northern Expressway. For example, the Strategic Planning Study by SKM in 1998 concluded that there was a need to provide additional capacity for traffic movement from the outer northern suburbs, and that it is significantly more cost effective to develop a new route on the fringe of the northern urban area than to upgrade the existing Main North Road through northern metropolitan Adelaide.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of Strategic Planning Committee
    NOTICE of STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING Pursuant to the provisions of Section 84(1) of the Local Government Act 1999 TO BE HELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLAYFORD CIVIC CENTRE 10 PLAYFORD BOULEVARD, ELIZABETH ON TUESDAY, 11 JUNE 2019 AT 7:00PM SAM GREEN ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Issue Date: Thursday, 6 June 2019 PRESIDING MEMBER - CR PETER RENTOULIS Mayor Glenn Docherty Cr Akram Arifi Cr Marilyn Baker Cr Stephen Coppins Cr Andrew Craig Cr Veronica Gossink Cr Shirley Halls Cr David Kerrison Cr Clint Marsh Cr Misty Norris Cr Jane Onuzans Cr Dennis Ryan Cr Gay Smallwood-Smith Cr Katrina Stroet Cr Cathy-Jo Tame Strategic Planning Committee Agenda 2 11 June 2019 CITY OF PLAYFORD STRATEGIC PLAN 1. Smart Service Delivery Program This program is about continuing to provide for the Outcomes changing needs and expectations of our diverse community, delivering the services they require. It 1.1 High quality services and amenities means making the most of our community’s existing 1.2 Improved service delivery strengths, talents and diversity, and working smarter to 1.3 Working smarter with our community connect our community with each other to contribute 1.4 Enhanced City presentation, community to overall wellbeing and the economic life of the City. pride and reputation 2. Smart Living Program This program is about Council playing its part to make the City more liveable and connected. As our older Outcomes suburbs age and our population and urban footprint 2.1 Smart development and urban renewal expands, we will find innovative ways to renew and 2.2 Enhanced City presentation, community ‘future proof’ the liveability of our neighbourhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Ridesprogramme ISSUE 64
    Bicycle SA SEPTEMBER-NOVEMBER 2017 RidesPROGRAMME ISSUE 64 FREE RIDES EVERY WEEK FOR EVERYONE! www.bikesa.asn.au RidesPROGRAMME September-November 2017 Information Ride Group Coordinators The rides are free of charge (unless indicated otherwise) and available 30/30 Beach Streak Mishmash to the general public. For a punctual start, please arrive 15 minutes prior Daniel 0433 391 674 Michele 0438 010 220 to the scheduled starting time. Riders are encouraged to join Bicycle All Women’s Bike Rides Night Espresso SA after three rides. Only Bicycle SA members are eligible to lead and Lanie 0406 452 117 Rob 8299 0230 coordinate rides. The ride leaders can be contacted for additional rides Better Harts Northside Cycling Group information. Each ride has been coded for your convenience and it is Sharon 8723 0805 Gary 8255 1979 [email protected] suggested that you choose the ride to suit your ability. Children under 16 Pedalling Parents Border BUG Warwick 8344 8996 shall be accompanied by a responsible adult. The Rides Programme is Marcus 0407 978 763 subject to change without notice. Peninsula Pedallers Cobwebs Raelene 8682 3196 [email protected] On Road Ride Codes Poseurs d’Adelaide ‘Cycle Salisbury’ Peter 0407 182 376 1 Up to 15km/h A Flat Nigel 0431 838 735 2 15 to 18km/h B A few hills Ride with Keith GAD-BUG Rebecca 8232 7277 3 18 to 20km/h C Hilly and steep (Goolwa and District Bicycle User Group) Riverland Riders 4 20 to 23km/h D Challenging Gavin 0468 909 397 Ruth 0427 752 815 5 23 to 26km/h Peter 0418 820 921 Anne 0431 829 973 Saturday Express 6 26+km/h Patsy 8379 6477 Gallery Glides Saturday Sojourn Mountain Bike Ride Codes Warwick 8344 8996 Chris 0414 802 919 Class 1 (MTB Beginner) Limited off road experience.
    [Show full text]
  • North-South Corridor Darlington Upgrade Project
    north-south corridor Darlington Upgrade Project Concept of lowered motorway, South Road/Sturt Road intersection background The North-South Corridor is one of Adelaide’s most Northern Expressway important transport corridors. It is the major route for north and south bound traffic including freight vehicles running between Gawler and Gawler Old Noarlunga, a distance of 78 kilometres. Proposed Northern Connector Outer Harbor PORT WAKEFIELD RD The Australian Government has committed to upgrade the North-South Corridor over VICTORIA RD the next decade and together with the South Australian Government has committed $620 MAIN NORTH RD million to construct the Darlington Upgrade South Road Superway Project. The Australian Government will PORT ADELAIDE provide $496 million, with the remaining MILITARY RD GRAND JUNCTION RD $124 million being contributed by the South Australian Government. TORRENS RD PORT RD This stretch of road provides a series of PROSPECT strategic free-flowing road links to connect FINDON Torrens Road to River Torrens upgrade the rapidly expanding industrial and Grange GRANGE RD NORTH RIVER TORRENS ADELAIDE residential growth areas in the north and ADELAIDE the south providing new opportunities for TAPLEYS HILL RD MILE END SOUTH TCE economic development. GREENHILL RD Gallipoli Underpass FULLARTON RD The current roadway isn’t capable of handling SOUTH RD GOODWOOD RD Glenelg Tram projected growth and the number of vehicles CROSS RD MARION RD ANZAC HWY Overpass that need to use the road or the size of freight Glenelg MORPHETT RD carriers travelling along it. In response, the BRIGHTON RD DAWS RD Australian and South Australian Governments are expanding the route by creating a MARION dedicated non-stop North-South Corridor STURT RD with a program to eliminate the worst Darlington Upgrade Project bottlenecks already underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Report
    northernexpressway environmental report A Part A. Introduction and Background 1. What is the Northern Expressway Project? 1-1 2. The environmental assessment process 2-1 3. Community and stakeholder engagement 3-1 Northern Expressway Environmental Report 1 What is the Northern Expressway Project? 1.1 Overview The proposed Northern Expressway Project consists of two components: the Northern Expressway (between Gawler and Port Wakefield Road) and the Port Wakefield Road Upgrade. The project will provide an improved highway and freight connection through metropolitan Adelaide between the Sturt Highway at Gawler and the Port River Expressway. This project will improve freight access from the northern areas of the State and from the main highways, and link key centres in the north, east and west of Australia with the Port of Adelaide, South Australia’s main shipping port. The location plan in Figure 1.1 places this road infrastructure in context. The Northern Expressway component – 23 km of new four-lane expressway with restricted access and a speed limit of 110 km/h – will link to Port Wakefield Road with a new intersection to the north of Taylors Road, approximately 3 km north of the Waterloo Corner intersection. Port Wakefield Road will be upgraded at key locations between the new intersection and the existing intersection with the Salisbury Highway; some local roads will be diverted to service road access for improved safety. The Expressway will replace the section of Main North Road between Gawler and Gepps Cross as the designated AusLink National Network road link. The proposed Northern Expressway and Port Wakefield Road Upgrade is South Australia’s largest and highest priority project under the current AusLink Investment Program and, as such, has the commitment of the South Australian Government.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-18 DPTI Annual Report
    Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure 2017-18 Annual Report Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure GPO Box 1533 Adelaide SA 5001 https://dpti.sa.gov.au/ Contact phone number 08 7109 7313 Contact email https://www.dpti.sa.gov.au/contact_us ISSN (PRINT VERSION) 2200-5879 ISSN (ONLINE VERSION) 2202-2015 Date presented to Minister: 28 September 2018 2017-18 ANNUAL REPORT for the Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure Contents Contents .................................................................................................................... 3 Section A: Reporting required under the Public Sector Act 2009, the Public Sector Regulations 2010 and the Public Finance and Audit Act 1987 ................. 4 Agency purpose or role ..................................................................................................... 4 Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 4 Key strategies and their relationship to SA Government objectives ................................... 4 Agency programs and initiatives and their effectiveness and efficiency ............................. 6 Legislation administered by the agency ............................................................................. 8 Organisation of the agency .............................................................................................. 10 Employment opportunity programs .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Delivery of Major Infrastructure Projects in SA
    Planning and Delivery of Major Infrastructure Projects in SA Mark Elford Executive Director, Economic Development Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure 8th Annual SA Major Project Conference 12-13 August 2015 Knet #9665529 Presentation Outline • Integrated Transport and Land Use Plan (ITLUP) • Regional Mining and Infrastructure Plan (RMIP) / Resources Infrastructure Taskforce (RIT) • North – South Corridor 30/09/2015 Strategic Context Integrated Transport and Land Use Plan Revised version released on 6 July 2015 The Process GOALS 1. Healthy, safe, affordable and connected communities 2. A strong, diverse and growing economy 3. Thriving natural and built environments 1. Growing the role of public transport 2. Efficient connections to export/import gateways CHALLENGES 3. Prioritising transport to encourage mixed-use development 4. Encouraging active travel modes 5. Fine-tuning maintaining and better utilising asset 6. Planning system to integrate transport and land use PRIORITIES 17 priorities to address challenges Public transport for Greater Adelaide Solutions for all of South Australia: Road Network for Greater Adelaide Managing and maintaining the asset SOLUTIONS Cycling and walking for Greater Adelaide Safety Regional South Australia Reducing environmental impacts Freight and ports Reducing car dependency Public Transport Complete the improvements to the north- south backbone train network (ie electrification) Ade LINK tram network Redesign and modernise the bus network Potential underground train loop in the
    [Show full text]
  • Inner West Precinct Transport and Parking Plan
    INNER WEST PRECINCT TRANSPORT AND PARKING PLAN May 2015 AECOM Inner West Precinct Transport and Parking Plan Client: City of Charles Sturt ABN: 42124960161 Prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd Level 28, 91 King William Street, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia T +61 8 7223 5400 F +61 8 7223 5499 www.aecom.com ABN 20 093 846 925 07-May-2015 Quality Information Document Inner West Precinct Transport and Parking Plan Ref p:\603x\60311346\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\final transport plan 2015\transport and parking plan\revised iwptpp 7-5-2015\inner west transport plan revised - 7 may 2015 (final).docx Date 07-May-2015 Prepared Olivia Franco by Reviewed Christian Bode by AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to the latest version of ISO9001, ISO14001, AS/NZS4801 and OHSAS18001. © AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (AECOM). All rights reserved. AECOM has prepared this document for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of AECOM. AECOM undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. This document has been prepared based on the Client’s description of its requirements and AECOM’s experience, having regard to assumptions that AECOM can reasonably be expected to make in accordance with sound professional principles. AECOM may also have relied upon information provided by the Client and other third parties to prepare this document, some of which may not have been verified.
    [Show full text]