DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Rio Vista Short Range Transit Plan for Rio Vista Delta Breeze: Fiscal Year 2010-2011 to 2019-2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Rio Vista Short Range Transit Plan for Rio Vista Delta Breeze: Fiscal Year 2010-2011 to 2019-2020 City of Rio Vista Short Range Transit Plan for Rio Vista Delta Breeze: Fiscal Year 2010-2011 to 2019-2020 Final Plan Prepared for the City of Rio Vista Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. RIO VISTA DELTA BREEZE SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Fiscal Year 2010-2011 to 2019-2020 Final Report Prepared for the City of Rio Vista One Main Street Rio Vista, California 94571 707 • 374-5337 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box 5875 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C Tahoe City, California 96145 530 • 583-4053 Federal transportation statutes require that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), in partnership with state and local agencies, develop and periodically update a long-range Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), and a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) which implements the RTP by programming federal funds to transportation projects contained in the RTP. In order to effectively execute these planning and programming responsibilities, MTC requires that each transit operator in its region which receives federal funding through the TIP, prepare, adopt, and submit to MTC a Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). The preparation of this SRTP has been funded in part by a grant from the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), through Section 5303 of the Federal Transit Act. The contents of this SRTP reflect the views of City of Rio Vista, and are not necessarily those of USDOT, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. The City of Rio Vista is solely responsible for the accuracy of information presented in this SRTP. Civil Rights Compliance: In compliance with Title VI regulations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, no person in the United States of America shall, on grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participating in, or denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. The City of Rio Vista must ensure that federally supported transit service and related benefits are distributed in an equitable manner. The City of Rio Vista has certified that it is in compliance with Title VI regulations. September 24, 2012 LSC#117080 Acknowledgements City of Rio Vista Interim City Manager, Roger Wong Council Member, Janith Norman Council Member, Constance Boulware Council Member, Tim Kubli Director of Public Works and Community Development, David Melilli Transit and Airport Coordinator, John Andoh Storer Transit Systems Supervisor, Becky Egleston Project Manager, Alberta Deanda LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Principal, Gordon Shaw Project Manager, Selena McKinney TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Plan Purpose and Content ............................................................................................. 1 Plan Issues..................................................................................................................... 1 Stakeholder Interviews................................................................................................... 2 Review of Previous Studies and Projects....................................................................... 5 Local and Regional Policies ........................................................................................... 8 2 Setting for Transportation Services................................................................................... 9 Project Area................................................................................................................... 9 3 Transit Service Providers................................................................................................ 19 Public Transportation Service...................................................................................... 19 Other Transportation Providers.................................................................................... 40 4 Transit Goals and Objectives .......................................................................................... 51 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 51 Review of Existing Goals and Objectives..................................................................... 51 5 Transit Demand Analysis................................................................................................ 65 Employee Transit Demand........................................................................................... 65 Elderly and Disabled Transit Demand.......................................................................... 66 General Public Transit Demand................................................................................... 66 Demand Estimation for Middle and High School Students........................................... 66 Intercity Transit Demand.............................................................................................. 67 Summary...................................................................................................................... 68 Future Trends in Transit Demand ................................................................................ 68 6 Service Alternatives........................................................................................................71 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 71 Cost Parameters for Service Alternatives .................................................................... 71 Local Service Alternatives............................................................................................ 71 Intercity Service Alternatives........................................................................................ 75 Other Service Alternatives............................................................................................ 79 Comparison of Alternative Packages ........................................................................... 80 7 Capital Alternatives......................................................................................................... 89 Vehicle Needs.............................................................................................................. 89 Non-Vehicle Capital Needs ......................................................................................... 89 8 Management and Administrative Alternatives ................................................................ 95 Management ................................................................................................................95 Marketing .................................................................................................................... 96 Update Transit Goals and Objectives .......................................................................... 98 Rio Vista Delta Breeze SRTP LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Final Report Page i 9 Transit Funding Sources ............................................................................................... 101 Introduction................................................................................................................ 101 Federal Transit Funding Sources............................................................................... 101 State Transit Funding Sources................................................................................... 104 Other Miscellaneous Revenue Sources..................................................................... 106 Funding Strategies..................................................................................................... 107 10 Rio Vista/Delta Breeze Short Range Transit Plan......................................................... 109 Introduction................................................................................................................ 109 City of Rio Vista Service Plan..................................................................................... 105 Capital Plan................................................................................................................ 116 Management and Administrative Plan........................................................................ 120 Revise and Update Transit Goals and Objectives...................................................... 121 Financial Plan............................................................................................................. 121 Implementation Plan................................................................................................... 125 Appendix A—City of Rio Vista Organization Chart Appendix B—Lists of Bus Stops for Rio Vista Delta Breeze Appendix C—Title VI Civil Rights Program Appendix D—Planned Large Developments LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLE PAGE 1 Rio Vista Demographic Characteristics........................................................................... 13 2 Rio Vista Resident Commute Travel Mode ..................................................................... 15 3 Rio Vista Residents Commute Travel Time .................................................................... 15 4 Rio Vista Delta Breeze Fare Structure ............................................................................ 25 5 Rio Vista Delta Breeze
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California
    1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California Prepared for: Premia Capital, LLC 801 Hamilton Street Redwood City, CA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. January 18, 2019 1180 MAIN STREET PROJECT, CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT, REDWOOD CITY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA This document entitled 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California was prepared by Stantec Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Premia Capital, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Joanne Grant, Archaeologist, MA, RPA Reviewed by (signature) John A. Nadolski, M.A. Approved
    [Show full text]
  • (Bridge No. 24-53) Spanning
    PAINTERSVILLE BRIDGE HAER CA-2295 (Bridge No. 24-53) HAER CA-2295 Spanning Sacramento River at California State Highway 160 Courtland vicinity Sacramento County California PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD PACIFIC WEST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1111 Jackson Street, Suite 700 Oakland, CA 94607 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD PAINTERSVILLE BRIDGE (Bridge No. 24-53) HAER No. CA-2295 Location: Spanning Sacramento River at Post Mile 20.96 of California State Highway 160, less than one mile south of Courtland, Sacramento County, California UTM: 10-624362mE/4242133mN. UTM References were calculated using the North American Datum (NAD) 1983 series of the United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.), which is the California State Standard. Present Owner: California Department of Transportation 1120 N St. Sacramento, CA 95814 Present Use: Highway Bridge Significance: The Paintersville Bridge is one of the very few unmodified examples in California of the Strauss Heel Trunnion Bascule Bridge, one of the most important patented bascules. It was also a link in the Victory Highway, a transcontinental highway, and played an integral part in transportation and agricultural history in the California Delta region. Report Prepared By: Margo Nayyar, Research Associate, Tory Swim, Research Associate, and Gloria Scott, Built Environment Preservation Services Branch Chief, Cultural Studies Office, Division of Environmental Analysis, California Department of Transportation Project Information: The control house on Paintersville Bridge was removed and replaced in 2007 as part of a project to correct various safety deficiencies, install state- of-the-art electrical control equipment to operate the movable spans, and to bring the bridge up to current health and safety codes for decent, safe and sanitary structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Rider's Guide
    FAIRFIELD AND SUISUN TRANSIT RIDER’S GUIDE FAIRFIELD AND SUISUN TRANSIT CONTENTS Introduction................................................................. Want.to.Learn.How.to.Ride.the.Bus?......................... Planning.Your.Trip...................................................... Waiting.for.the.Bus.....................................................4 Boarding.the.Bus........................................................5 What.If.I.Use.a.Wheelchair,.Scooter,.or.Walker?.......6 Bicycles......................................................................8 Traveling.with.Children...............................................9 Paying.Your.Fare........................................................9 Clipper.Card............................................................. Transfers..................................................................2 Riding.the.Bus..........................................................2 Requesting.a.Stop....................................................4 What.If.I.Miss.My.Stop?............................................5 SolanoExpress.........................................................5 Transit.Training.........................................................6 Transit.Ambassador.Training...................................6 Solano.Mobility.Call.Center......................................7 For.document.translation,.please.call: English Para.traducción.de.documentos,. Spanish llame.al:. 對於文檔翻譯電話 Chinese Đối với tài liệu gọi dịch: Vietnamese Para.sa.mga.dokumento.tawag.sa. Filipino pagsasalin:
    [Show full text]
  • 1963 1963 the the of of of of Description Description
    e y ~ 'rte ~ 4 ~ ~~~. ~ ~ ~L +i's 's' ~ *" a~t,y'" J ^ ,..,T+s d az' ~ 8a•. ~r ~ ~Y. r~ ,~ } ~„ ~"' y s'~ ~- ~- N ~, 4 r ~ ts~ 0 ~ i~° e~ ~" t ~ y ~ _ ~ ~ y ^: *} ~ }t. ~ `/ ~ 6~ Y ~p S d~Y R" vW # ' `i ti r n' ke~s ~ J ~ ~ ~~ +3 ~ y t ~r x. t' ~ ~~ ~i _ ~.~y ~g x ,. 9~ :~ ~ x aaa+ra.. "' ~$ .;~w~.v 'Y~1se~n ~+~.~-*a fir;.: ~. ,... §~~`" u, a ., .. ~.: w Letters of Transmittal December 9, 1963 December 9, 1963 JOHN ERRECA EDMUND G. BROWN Director of Public Works Governor of California State of California My dear Governor: Dear Sir: The 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways, Depart- In compliance with Section 143 of the Streets and Highways ment of Public Works, which I am pleased to submit to you, Code, the 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways for presents a broad picture of the state highway program during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1963, is submitted herewith fiscal year 1962-63. It describes the steady progress in planning for your approval and transmittal to Governor Edmund G. and constructing today for tomorrow's transportation needs, as Brown. well as the activities of the division's various units. The report contains information on the construction program Your attention is invited to the comments contained in the through the end of 1963 and a description of the projects in enclosed letter of transmittal from the State Highway Engineer the budget for fiscal year 1964-65 which the California High- regarding progress on the interstate system and on the network way Commission adopted in October.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Corridor-Auburn-Sacramento-San
    Now Serving! Temporary Terminal Transbay CAPITOL ® MARCH 1, 2015 CORRIDOR SCHEDULE Effective AUBURN / SACRAMENTO ® – and – SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA – and – Enjoy the journey. SAN JOSE 1-877-9-RIDECC Call 1-877-974-3322 SAN FRANCISCO - SAN JOSE - OAKLAND - EMERYVILLE SACRAMENTO - ROSEVILLE -AUBURN - RENO And intermediate stations NEW SAN FRANCISCO THRUWAY LOCATION The Amtrak full service Thruway bus station has moved to the Transbay Temporary Terminal, 200 Folsom Street, from the former station at the Ferry Building. CAPITOLCORRIDOR.ORG NRPC Form W34–150M–3/1/15 Stock #02-3342 Schedules subject to change without notice. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corp. Visit Capitol Corridor is a registered service mark of the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. page 2 CAPITOL CORRIDOR-Weekday Westbound Service on the Train Number 521 523 525 527 529 531 533 Capitol Corridor® Will Not Operate 5/25, 7/3, 9/7, 11/26, 11/27, 12/25, 1/1 Coaches: Unreserved. y y Q y Q y Q y Q y Q y Q Café: Sandwiches, snacks On Board Service y å and beverages. å å å å å å Q Amtrak Quiet car. å Mile Symbol Wi-Fi available. @™ Transfer point to/from the Sparks, NV–The Nugget 0 >w Dpp ∑w- Coast Starlight. Reno, NV 3 @∞ BART rapid transit connection Truckee, CA 38 >v >v available for San Francisco Colfax, CA 102 and East Bay points. Transfer >w- Auburn, CA (Grass Valley) 0 6 30A to BART at Richmond or >v- Rocklin, CA 14 6 53A Oakland Coliseum stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Solano 4 Wind Project EIR 8 References Executive
    Solano 4 Wind Project EIR July 2019 8 References Executive Summary No references are cited in this chapter. Chapter 1, “Introduction” No references are cited in this chapter. Chapter 2, “Project Description” California Energy Commission. 2018 (August). Operational Wind Projects, Solano Wind Resource Area, 2018. Map scale 1:24,000. Available: https://www.energy.ca.gov/maps/renewable/wind/WindResourceArea_Solano.pdf. Accessed March 27, 2019. CEC. See California Energy Commission. Solano County. 1987 (May). Solano County Wind Turbine Siting Plan and Environmental Impact Report. Department of Environmental Management, Fairfield, CA. U.S. Geological Survey. 2019 (January). U.S. Wind Turbine Database. Available: https://eerscmap.usgs.gov/uswtdb/viewer/#14.02/38.16164/-121.79729. Accessed February 9, 2019. USGS. See U.S. Geological Survey. Chapter 3, “Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures” Section 3.1, “Aesthetics” Black & Veatch. 2019 (January 3). Solano Wind Energy Project, Wind Project Shadow Flicker Assessment. California Department of Transportation 2019. Scenic Highway Mapping System. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/. Accessed March 18, 2019. Federal Aviation Administration. 2018 (August 17). Obstruction Marking and Lighting, including Changes 1 and 2. Advisory Circular 70/7460-1L. Chapter 13, “Marking and Lighting Wind Turbines.” Federal Highway Administration. 2015 (January). Guidelines for the Visual Impact Assessment of Highway Projects. FHWA-HEP-15-029. Washington, DC. Page 8-1 Solano 4 Wind Project EIR July 2019 National Research Council. 2007. Environmental Impacts of Wind-Energy Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NRC. See National Research Council. Sacramento Municipal Utility District. 2007 (September). Draft Environmental Impact Report for the SMUD Solano Wind Project Phase 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Solanoexpress Bus Routes Transit Information Fairfield Transportation Center Fairfield
    Regional Transit Map Transit REGIONAL TRANSIT DIAGRAM To To Eureka Clearlake Information Mendocino Transit DOWNTOWN AREA TRANSIT CONNECTIONS Authority To Ukiah Lake Oakland Mendocino Transit 12th Street Oakland City Center BART: Greyhound BART, AC Transit FA FA 19th Street Oakland BART: FA BART, AC Transit Cloverdale San Francisco Yolobus To Davis Civic Center/UN Plaza BART: Winters Fairfi eld and Suisun Transit SolanoExpress is Solano SolanoExpress is Solano BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Fairfield 101 Embarcadero BART & Ferry Terminal: County’s intercity transit connection. County’s intercity transit connection. BART, Golden Gate Transit, Muni, SamTrans, (FAST) is the local transit system Baylink, Alameda/Oakland Ferry, Alameda Harbor Faireld and Healdsburg Bay Ferry, Blue & Gold Fleet, Amtrak CA Thruway Suisun Transit SolanoExpress routes connect cities SolanoExpress routes connect cities Transit To Sacramento for Fairfi eld and Suisun City and also Mongomery Street BART: Healdsburg BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Dixon within the county and provide service within the county and provide service Calistoga Readi- operates many of the SolanoExpress (Operated by FAST) (Operated by SolTrans) Handi Powell Street BART: Transportation Ride Van Calistoga BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans regional routes. Please visit www.fasttransit. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. San Francisco Caltrain at 4th & King: Dixon Windsor Deer Caltrain, Muni, Amtrak CA Thruway org or call 707-422-BUSS (707-422-2877) for For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or Park Transbay Temporary Terminal: Guerneville AC Transit, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans, 80 visit www.solanoexpress.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Semi-Monthly Report
    SEMI-MONTHLY REPORT “A friendly community in which to live, work and play” February 22, 2013 Upcoming City Council Meetings… March 7, 2013 – City Council Meeting @ 7:00pm – City Council Chambers March 21, 2013 – City Council Meeting @ 7:00pm – City Council Chambers March 27, 2013 – Special Council Meeting @ 12 Noon – City Council Chambers April 4, 2013 – City Council Meeting @ 7:00pm – City Council Chambers . City Administration… The City is now contracting with Procomm Inc. for our information technology (I.T.) services. Chris Cannon will remain our contact and he will continue to provide weekly site visits on Wednesday’s. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) will temporarily suspend service of the Real McCoy II Ferry for approximately two-weeks starting on Monday, February 25th until Sunday, March 10th to perform preventive maintenance, and make repairs to the ferry slip. The Real McCoy II is scheduled to be closed Monday, February 25th at 12:01 a.m. until 12:01 a.m. on Sunday, March 10th. All work is weather permitting. During the service interruption, motorists are advised to use Highway 160 and the J-Mack Ferry along Highway 220. For the latest information, motorists can call the Caltrans Ryer Island Ferry Update Line at (510) 622-0120. City Council Reports… Report by Vice Mayor Constance Boulware: I met with Yolo-Solano QMD Air Monitoring Technician Mike Breuning and Executive Director Mat Ehrhardt at the Rio Vista air quality monitoring station. Rio Vista has healthy air most of the year. But there are days in which air pollution can cause health problems for children, the elderly or those with lung or heart ailments.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Existing Conditions
    Buchanan Field Airport Master Planning Program Field A. INVENTORY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Buchanan A > Inventory of Existing Conditions INTRODUCTION. Buchanan Field Airport (CCR) is the major general aviation reliever airport serving Contra Costa County and multiple communities located in the northeastern portion of the greater San Francisco Bay Area (see Figure A1). The Airport has been a catalyst for business growth in the region and has served as an anchor for the local employment base, as well as meeting the aviation transportation needs. Situated in an unincorporated portion of Contra Costa County, directly adjacent to the thriving urban heartbeat of the City of Concord, Buchanan Field Airport is a vital component of the transportation infrastructure serving the region for tourism and business. Buchanan Field Airport is well equipped to serve regional demand related to general aviation and business aviation needs. The Airport has a reputation as being an excellent aviation facility that offers a safe and efficient operational environment. The Bay Area continues to experience significant increases in business activity, commercial and residential growth, and economic development. Because of this, Buchanan Field Airport is also being presented with increasing operational and facility demands. Many of the areas surrounding the Airport, with many high quality homes and environmental amenities, have experienced significant residential development, resulting in homeowner concerns about the effect that the Airport may have on their lifestyle. Some of these homes and facilities are located within a two to three mile radius of the Airport. Thus, the Airport may influence the social, economic, and physical environments of the area in which it operates.
    [Show full text]
  • Solano Express Bus Routes Transit Information Pleasant Hill Station Area Contra Costa Centre
    Fare Information effective January 1, 2016 Senior3 Adult/ (65+) Youth2 County Connection & (6-64) For more detailed information about BART Disabled service, please see the BART Schedule, BART 1 Transit CASH FARES (exact change only) Regional Transit Map System Map, and other BART information REGIONAL TRANSIT DIAGRAM displays in this station. Regular Ride $2.00 $1.00 To To Express Ride (900 series route numbers) $2.25 $1.00 Eureka Clearlake Information Mendocino Transit DOWNTOWN AREA TRANSIT CONNECTIONS PREPAID FARES Authority To Ukiah Lake Oakland ® 4 $2.00 $1.00 Mendocino Transit 12th Street Oakland City Center BART: Clipper Cash Value Greyhound BART, AC Transit 19th Street Oakland BART: 5 $3.75 $1.75 BART, AC Transit Day Pass Cloverdale San Francisco Yolobus To Davis Discount Regular/Express 20-Ride Pass N/A $15.00 Civic Center/UN Plaza BART: Winters BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Commuter Card (20 Regular+BART Transfer-Rides) $40.00 N/A Pleasant Hill 101 Embarcadero BART & Ferry Terminal: BART, Golden Gate Transit, Muni, SamTrans, Baylink, Alameda/Oakland Ferry, Alameda Harbor Faireld and 6 $60.00 N/A Healdsburg Bay Ferry, Blue & Gold Fleet, Amtrak CA Thruway Suisun Transit East Bay Regional Local 31-Day Transit To Sacramento Mongomery Street BART: Healdsburg BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Dixon 6 $70.00 N/A Calistoga Readi- County Connection (CCCTA) effective January 1, 2016 East Bay Regional Express 31-Day Handi Powell Street BART: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Fare Information Station Area Ride BART Red* Ticket
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Vista Airport Pavement Management Plan, Drainage Assessment, and Electrical Plan
    Statement of Qualifications for Rio Vista Airport Pavement Management Plan, Drainage Assessment, and Electrical Plan Prepared for City of Rio Vista Prepared by Statement of Qualifications for RioRio VVistaista AAirportp Pavement Management Plan, DrainageiA AsseAssessment,ssment,ment,nt, and Electrical Plan July 22, 2010 765 The City Drive Suite 400 Mr. John Andoh Orange, California Transit & Airport Coordinator 92868 City of Rio Vista TEL 714 939 1030 FAX 714 938 9488 One Main Street Rio Vista, CA 94571 Re: Statement of Interest and Qualifications for Professional Airport Engineering Design and Planning Services for the City of Rio Vista and the Rio Vista Municipal Airport Dear Mr. Andoh: The City of Rio Vista is looking for the most qualified airport consultant to work with the City to improve the Rio Vista Municipal Airport. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) is that firm. We believe that Kimley-Horn is the right choice for the City based on the following: History of Stability and Strong California Presence. Kimley-Horn is an employee owned, national firm. Since its inception in 1967, our firm has never been sold or acquired, or merged with other entities. Furthermore, we are ranked in the top 20 national aviation firms by ENR, have been ranked No.1 firm to work for by CE News several times, and are in the top 100 companies to work for by Fortune. Kimley-Horn is stable. We are consistent and we’re not going anywhere. We are confident that the people and the company you see in California today will be the people and company you see for the life of your projects.
    [Show full text]