Download Full Program Here
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download=47:Poland-Germany-Partnership-For-Europe
BRIEF POLICY AFTER TUSK: POLAND IN EUROPE Piotr Buras SUMMARY The departures of Donald Tusk and Radoslaw Sikorski Poland has just experienced the most mark the end of an era in Polish politics. Tusk will take successful decade in its modern history. It took office as president of the European Council on 1 December, advantage of the opportunities presented by EU integration and has enjoyed stable political and Sikorski left the Ministry of Foreign Affairs after the and economic development. Not hit by the government reshuffle in September to become Marshal of economic crisis and led by the tandem of Tusk the Sejm (chair of the Polish parliament). Together, the and Sikorski, Warsaw won the confidence of former prime minister and the former foreign minister its main EU partners, most notably Berlin, emblematise Poland’s success in recent years in achieving and earned a strong position within the bloc. The nomination of Tusk for the post of the clear economic gains and making a splash in foreign and president of the European Council marked the European affairs. Against a backdrop of financial and end of this unprecedented era. The next decade economic crisis, Poland emerged as an important player on may be more difficult and a continuation of the European stage. Poland’s successful run is by no means certain. The country needs a new economic model As the only country in Europe not to experience an economic to sustain its impressive growth. It faces political dilemmas with regard to accession slump, Warsaw benefited politically from the crisis – and to the eurozone as well as to its eastern and became an important ally to Berlin. -
60 Years of Diplomatic Relations Between Poland and the People’S Republic of China Historical Review
POLISH POLITICAL SCIENCE VOL XL 2011 PL ISSN 0208-7375 60 YEARS OF DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS BETWEEN POLAND AND THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA HISTORICAL REVIEW by Marceli Burdelski ! e diplomatic relations between Poland and China had been estab- lished before World War II. ! e new stage in the relations has started on October 7, 1949, when Poland o" cially recognized the People’s Republic of China (PRC), which was declared on October 1, 1949. 1 ! erefore, in 2009, we had two anniversaries: the 60 th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of china and the 60 th anniversary of establishing the diplomatic relations between Poland and PRC. ! is gives the opportunity to summarize mutual relations. ! ose 60 years have been # lled with positive stories, which had signi# cant in$ uence on the development of bilateral relations. However, one can also # nd di" cult, even tragic moments during the history of these two nations. ! ose uneasy moments had also direct impact on mutual relations. 1 J. Rowiński, Wahadło, czyli stosunki polityczne PRL–ChRL , [in:] Polska–Chiny Wczo raj, dziś, jutro , ed. B. Góralczyk, Toruń 2009, p. 19. 212 MARCELI BURDELSKI 1. THE INTERWAR PERIOD 1918 1939 AND THE POSTWAR ERA AFTER 1945 When Poland restored its independence in 1918, China was immersed in post-revolution chaos. A! er the Revolution of 1911, which overthrown the Qing dynasty, the attempts to implement multi-parties, parliamentary democracy based on the western model have failed completely. As a result the informal dissolution of the state – that transformed into smaller and greater quasi-state entities controlled by local warlords, sometimes waging wars against each other – took place. -
VI Europe–Russia Economic Forum
VI Europe–Russia Economic Forum Sejm of the Republic of Poland Warsaw, Poland ST OF MAY – ST OF JUNE Under the High Patronage of Grzegorz Schetyna, Marshal of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland Organizer Publisher Foundation Institute for Eastern Studies ul. Solec 85 00–382 Warsaw Tel.: + 48 22 583 11 00 Fax: + 48 22 583 11 50 e–mail: [email protected] www.forum–ekonomiczne.pl Layout BikerStudio www.biker.wns.pl Print Flexergis Sp. z o.o. (Drukarnia BAAD) Warsaw 2011 Contents Programme . 5 Speakers. 19 List of Participants . 55 Programme Programme 6 Programme Programme 7 May 31, 2011 Registration of participants 11:30–12:15 Presentation of the Economic Forum “Russia 2010. Report on Transformation”. Political and Economic 12:15–13:30 Situation in Russia in 2010 Break 13:30–13:45 Partnership for Modernization 13:45–15:15 Lunch 15:15–16:15 Russia in 21st Century. Expectations and Projects 16:15–17:45 Coffee break 17:45–18:00 European Union and Russia: Common Values 18:00–19:30 Reception 20:00 www.economic–forum.pl www.economic–forum.pl 6 Programme Programme 7 June 1, 2011 Energy Industry. Russian Resources and European Security 09:00–10:30 NATO–EU–Russia Relations after the Lisbon Summit 09:00–10:30 Coffee break 10:30–10:45 Europe and Russia in the Global Economy: Opportunities and Threats 10:45–12:15 EU and Russia – Foreign Policy Directions 10:45–12:15 Coffee break 12:15–12:30 EU–Russia. New Perspectives for Partnership and Cooperation 12:30–14:00 Regional Cooperation. -
Redalyc.POLAND's FOREIGN and SECURITY POLICY
Revista UNISCI ISSN: 2386-9453 [email protected] Universidad Complutense de Madrid España Bieczyk-Missala, Agnieszka POLAND’S FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY: MAIN DIRECTIONS Revista UNISCI, núm. 40, enero, 2016, pp. 101-117 Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=76743646007 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista UNISCI / UNISCI Journal , Nº 3 9 ( Enero / January 2016 ) POLAND’S FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY: MAI N DIRECTIONS Agnieszka Bieńczyk - Missala 1 University of Warsaw Abstract : This article tries to present the main areas of Polish foreign and security policy.Poland’s membership in the EU and in NATO was the strongest determinant of its position in international relations, and the guiding light of its foreign policy. Poland’s wor k in the EU was focused in particular on EU policy towards its eastern neighbours, common energy policy and security issues, while in NATO, Poland has always been a proponent of the open doors policy and has maintained close relationship with the US, suppo rting many of its policies and initiatives . Keywords : Poland, European Union Security and Defence, NATO, Poland´s bilateral relations . Resumen : El artículo presenta las principales áreas de la política exterior y de seguridad de Polonia, siendo su pertenencia a la Unión Europea y la OTAN los principales determinantes de su posición en las relaciones internacionales y el foco que ilumina su política exterior. -
General Performance of the Polish Presidency
117 GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE POLISH PRESIDENCY Piotr Maciej Kaczyński* The Treaty of Lisbon has made the rotating Council Presidency politically irrelevant. Before December 2009, national leaders controlled the activities of the Council, and the relationship between the Council and the Parliament favoured the Council much more than after December 2009. On the one hand, under the new rules the Council has lost political weight and is now balanced in almost all its activities by the European Parliament. The European Council, on the other hand, has largely taken political clout over from the Council Presidency, as it now has its own permanent president, and there is no special role left for the rotating Presidency. On top of these things, not only have the Council powers regarding other institutions been limited, but also within the Council the rotating Presidency has been limited by the permanent chair of the Foreign Affairs Council and many of the subsidiary working parties and committees. Because of all these limitations, the rotating Presidency is no longer a Union Presidency. If this concept was not yet fully visible before the Polish Presidency of the Council of the European Union in the second semester of 2011, then the Polish experience was very telling. Poland is a larger EU member state; it was committed to the preparations for the Presidency for a number of years and had a dedicated political and administrative leadership. The Polish officials executed the Presidency effectively although they were doing it for the first time. And still, they fell short with political weight. Their leverage over the European Council was similar to every other country’s leverage over the European Council. -
Poland by Piotr Arak, Piotr Żakowiecki
Poland by Piotr Arak, Piotr Żakowiecki Capital: Warsaw Population: 38 million GNI/capita, PPP: $23,930 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 National Democratic 3.25 3.50 3.25 3.25 2.75 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 Governance Electoral Process 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.50 1.50 Civil Society 1.50 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Independent Media 2.25 2.25 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 Local Democratic 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 Governance Judicial Framework 2.25 2.50 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 and Independence Corruption 3.00 3.00 2.75 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 Democracy Score 2.36 2.39 2.25 2.32 2.21 2.14 2.18 2.18 2.21 2.32 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. If consensus cannot be reached, Freedom House is responsible for the final ratings. The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. -
Análisis Discursivo De La Intervención De La OTAN En Kosovo: Estudio Comparativo Del Periódico ABC Y El País
Máster Oficial en Comunicación Política y Empresarial Análisis discursivo de la intervención de la OTAN en Kosovo: Estudio comparativo del periódico ABC y El País Alumno: Peio Nikasi Yoldi Zaitegui Tutora: Mercedes Herrero de la Fuente Junio de 2018 1 ÍNDICE 1. INTRODUCCIÓN………...………………………………………………………………….1 1.1. Contextualización histórico-sociológica…………………….………………….1 1.2. Kosovo bajo control de la República Federal Yugoslava…………………….3 1.3. Justificación………………………………………………………………….……5 1.4. Objetivos…………………………………………………………………..………6 1.5. Hipótesis…………………………………………………………………………..6 2. MARCO TEÓRICO……………………………………..…………………………………...7 2.1. Comunicación Política…………………………………………………………...7 2.1.1. Organizaciones políticas……………………………………….……10 2.1.2. Medios de comunicación……………………………….……….......12 2.1.3. Opinión pública: la ciudadanía………………………...……………15 2.2. Aproximación a diferentes teorías comunicativas……………...……………17 2.2.1. Framing theory o Teoría del Encuadre…….………………………18 2.2.2. Agenda Setting…………………………………………….…………22 2.2.3. Espiral del silencio……………………………………………………25 2.3. Propaganda y persuasión……………………………………..……………….28 3. METODOLOGÍA…………………………………………………………………………...31 4. CONTEXTUALIZACIÓN…………………………………………………………………..32 4.1. La OTAN y la opinión pública española………………………………………32 4.2. Una intervención cuestionada……………………………………………..…..36 5. MARCO ANALÍTICO……...……………………………………………………………….38 5.1. El País……………………………………………………………………………38 5.2. ABC……………………………………………………………………………….53 5.3. Datos cuantitativos……...…………………………………………....………...67 6. CONCLUSIONES……………………………………………………………………….…69 -
Poland by Piotr Arak and Piotr Z˙Akowiecki
Poland by Piotr Arak and Piotr Z˙akowiecki Capital: Warsaw Population: 38.5 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$22,830 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2015. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Electoral Process 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.50 Civil Society 1.25 1.50 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Independent Media 1.75 2.25 2.25 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 National Democratic Governance 2.75 3.25 3.50 3.25 3.25 2.75 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Local Democratic Governance 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 Judicial Framework and Independence 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Corruption 3.25 3.00 3.00 2.75 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.50 Democracy Score 2.14 2.36 2.39 2.25 2.32 2.21 2.14 2.18 2.18 2.21 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). -
Monitoring Wyborczy Telewizyjnych Serwisów Informacyjnych
Monitoring wyborczy telewizyjnych serwisów informacyjnych Wybory do Parlamentu RP 2015 Raport podsumowujący Telewizje ogólnopolskie Badanie zrealizowane na zlecenie: ©Krajowa Rada Radiofonii i Telewizji, 2015 Zespół koordynujący i przygotowujący raport: Dr Tomasz Gackowski, mgr Marcin Łączyński Zespół badawczy realizujący projekt: Dr Karolina Brylska, dr Tomasz Gackowski, mgr Anna Krawczyk, mgr Marcin Łączyński oraz zespół badawczy: Aleksandra Beczek, Justyna Dąbrowska, Paweł Dąbkowski, Ewa Domańska, Elżbieta Gawryś, Milena Kalinowska, Marlena Kołek, Katarzyna Kotarska, Grzegorz Kowalczyk, Łukasz Krawczyński, Olga Łęcka, Mariola Machalska, Michał Mijalski, Anita Mycak, Mateusz Patera, Maria Rajchert, Katarzyna Rosiak, Dagmara Sidyk, Amanda Siwek, Iwona Sołtys, Martyna Strzelczyk, Marlena Sztyber, Kamila Węclewska, Ewelina Woike, Ksenia Wróblewska, Katarzyna Zawodnik oraz zespół rekodujący Redakcja raportu: Mgr Anna Krawczyk 2 Spis treści 1. Wprowadzenie i nota metodologiczna ............................................................................................... 4 1.1. Cele projektu ................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2. Proces analizy badanych materiałów ........................................................................................... 6 2. Wyniki ilościowej analizy serwisów informacyjnych ........................................................................... 9 2.1. Ekspozycja tematyki wyborczej w serwisach informacyjnych -
Revista Elcano. Edición #05 | Noviembre
Revista Número #05 I Noviembre - Diciembre 2014 Publicaciones Toreros famélicos, majas desahuciadas y “Leyenda Negra” La presencia española en Tailandia Spain leads the world market for infrastructure development Un año del Plan de Internacionalización de la Cultura Española (PICE) España, de nuevo, en el Consejo de Seguridad: ¿qué cabe esperar? Can Spain afford the economic programme of Podemos? Pautas de implicación entre condenados por actividades relacionadas con el terrorismo yihadista Igualdad de género y política exterior española Ocho cuestiones clave para la internacionalización de la empresa Is China rebalancing? Yes, but with Chinese characteristics Entrevista con... Rebeca Grynspan Actividades II Foro Elcano sobre Terrorismo Global Patronato Real Instituto Elcano Conectados Elcano en las redes sociales Coordinadora: Mª Dolores de Azategui © 2014 Real Instituto Elcano C/ Príncipe de Vergara, 51 28006 Madrid www.realinstitutoelcano.org ISSN: 2341-4006 Depósito Legal: M-14968-2014 En este número... La visión que de España se tiene a través de las viñetas de la prensa internacional; la presencia española en Tailandia; España en el Consejo de Seguridad; el Plan de Internacionalización de la Cultura Española o las pautas de implicación de condenados por actividades relacionadas con el terrorismo yihadista, así como la igualdad de género y la política exterior española son algunos de los temas que recoge la sección de Publicaciones, que en esta ocasión incluye, además, las cuestiones clave para la internacionalización de la empresa; la viabilidad del programa económico de Podemos; el liderazgo español en el mercado mundial del desarrollo de infraestructuras o el reequilibrio de China bajo sus propias condiciones. La Entrevista, realizada por Andrés Ortega, investigador senior del Real Instituto Elcano, tiene como protagonista a Rebeca Grynspan, diplomática costarricense y actualmente secretaria general iberoamericana. -
Mys´L Ludowa
Ludowe Towarzystwo Naukowo-Kulturalne MYS´L LUDOWA Nr 4/2012 Rada Programowa Janusz Gmitruk – przewodnicza˛cy, Romuald Turkowski – sekretarz, członkowie: Mieczysław Adamczyk, Stanisław Durlej, Józef Hampel, Jan Jachymek, Stanisław Jaczyn´ski, Adam Koseski, Andrzej Lech, Piotr Matusak, Jerzy Mazurek, Lesław Michnowski, Stanisław Palka, Kazimierz Przybysz, Zygmunt Sere˛ga, Jan Zalewa Komitet Redakcyjny Kazimierz Bas´cik – Kraków, Radosław Da˛browski – Krasnystaw, Arkadiusz Indraszczyk – Siedlce (redaktor naczelny), Jan Jachymek – Lublin, Tomasz Koziełło – Rzeszów (sekretarz), Krzysztof Lachowski – Warszawa, Dorota Pasiak-Wa˛sik – Warszawa, Jacek Szamik – Krasnystaw, Marcin Wichmanowski – Lublin Opracowanie redakcyjne Dorota Pasiak-Wa˛sik Artykuły i materiały recenzowane © Copyright by Ludowe Towarzystwo Naukowo-Kulturalne, Warszawa 2012 ISSN 2080-0029 Wydawca Ludowe Towarzystwo Naukowo-Kulturalne 02-730 Warszawa, al. Wilanowska 204 tel./fax.: (22) 843 78 73, 843 38 76 Skład i łamanie „Akapit – Włodzimierz Jurkowski” tel. 602 309 926 Spis tres´ci Do Czytelników . .7 Artykuły i studia Jan Jachymek – Ludowcy i chadecy . .15 Dominik Szczepan´ski – Strategie aktywizacji elektoratu wiejskiego w kampaniach wyborczych ugrupowan´ liberalno-demokratycznych w Polsce (1993-1997) . .41 Krzysztof Lachowski – Zmiany s´wiadomos´ci . .55 Roman Jusiak OFM – Polskie panteony narodowe . .65 Z historii Milena Stan´ko – Wiejski Uniwersytet Orkanowy na Gackiej Górce – rys historyczny, mys´l i załoz˙enia . .77 Daniel Koteluk – Kontynuacja czy „nowe otwarcie”? Kulisy organizacji wiejskiego sportu na tle przemian administracyjnych w woje- wództwie poznan´skim i zielonogórskim w latach 1945-1950 . .89 Twórcy i propagatorzy mys´li ludowej Antoni Mieczkowski – Stanisław Kalinowski (1924-2010). Kapłan, rolnik i społecznik . .101 Toz˙samos´c´ ruchu ludowego Janusz Gmitruk – Jubileusz Polskiego Stronnictwa Ludowego . .111 Eugeniusz Jabłon´ski – Najbliz˙sze wsi, ale ogólnonarodowe . -
Prezes Wyższego Urzędu Górniczego
PREZES WYŻSZEGO URZĘDU GÓRNICZEGO Mirosław Koziura Katowice, dnia 11 października 2014 r. PR.0201.106.2014 PR.0201.21.2014 ldz. 30970/10/2014/JP według rozdzielnika Działając na podstawie pełnomocnictwa nr 37 Ministra Środowiska z dnia 27 marca 2014 r. oraz § 35 ust. 1 i 2 uchwały nr 190 Rady Ministrów z dnia 29 października 2013 r. — Regulamin pracy Rady Mini strów (M. P. poz. 979), uprzejmie proszę o zajęcie stanowiska wobec projektów rozporządzeń Ministra Śro dowiska (wersje z dnia 7 października 2014 r.): 1) w sprawie utworzenia Okręgowego Urzędu Górniczego w Gdańsku; 2) w sprawie nazw, siedzib i właściwości miejscowej okręgowych urzędów. Stosownie do § 52 ust. 1 wyżej powołanej uchwały, projekty zostały w dniu 21 października 2014 r. udostępnione w Biuletynie Informacji Publicznej na stronie podmiotowej Rządowego Centrum Legislacji, w serwisie Rządowy Proces Legislacyjny. Projekty wymienionych rozporządzeń zostały umieszczone w wykazie prac legislacyjnych Ministra Śro dowiska pod numerami odpowiednio: 77 i 78. Uprzejmie proszę o zajęcie stanowiska wobec projektów w terminie do dnia 31 października 2014 r. W przypadku zajęcia stanowiska, zwracam się z uprzejmą prośbą o przesłanie jego treści również faksem na nr (32) 736-17-48 lub drogą elektroniczną na adres: [email protected]. Nieprzedstawienie stanowiska w zaproponowanym terminie uznam za uzgodnienie treści projektów. Kontakt: Departament Prawny Wyższego Urzędu Górniczego tel.: (32) 736-17-31 lub (32) 736-17-70 fax: (32)736 1748 adres e-mail: [email protected]. Wyższy Urząd Górniczy, ul. Poniatowskiego 31, 40-055 Katowice tel. 32 736 17 52, faks 32 251 48 84, e-mail: [email protected], www.wug.gov.pl Otrzymują: 1.