DOCSLIB.ORG

Adaptive Radiation Peter R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adaptive Radiation Peter R © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. VI.10 Adaptive Radiation Peter R. Grant OUTLINE GLOSSARY 1. Biodiversity Allopatry. The occurrence of species that occupy sepa- 2. Origin and development of the concept rate environments, such as islands. 3. The ecological theory Competition. The struggle between two or more individ- 4. Speciation uals or species for a resource in limited supply that 5. Ecological opportunity they jointly consume (e.g., nutrients for a plant, prey 6. Species interactions for a predator, or places for prey to avoid being 7. Intrinsic factors: Key innovations eaten). Competition may take the form of an aggres- 8. Hybridization sive interaction such as fighting, or differential de- 9. Testing the ideas pletion of a resource by the competitors. 10. Future prospects Disparity. The degree of phenotypic difference among individuals or species in one or more traits. The world has millions of species, and they display an Ecomorph. A recognizable association between morphol- astonishing variety of size, color, and behavior. Adap- ogy of individuals or species and use of the environ- tive radiations comprise groups of distinctive yet closely ment. related species that have evolved from a common an- Evolvability. The genetic and developmental properties cestor in a relatively short time. Studies of these radia- of members of a species that determine the likeli- tions help reveal the causes of their evolution. As a result hood that it will undergo evolutionary change. of natural selection during and after speciation, descen- Introgressive Hybridization. The interbreeding of two dant species differ morphologically or physiologically species or genetically divergent populations and sub- in the way they exploit different environments. Adap- sequent breeding of the offspring with members of tive differentiation also depends on the absence of con- one of the parental populations, resulting in the trans- straints from competitor species. The guiding force of fer of genes. natural environments is revealed in the observation Parapatry. The occurrence of species in adjacent or that the same evolutionary pathway is often taken by contiguous distributional ranges. different organisms in the same environment. Taxonom- Sympatry. The occurrence of species that occupy the ic groups vary in their intrinsic potential to diversify same area. because they possess traits that are key evolutionary inno- vations or because they readily exchange genes through hybridization. Invasion of an underexploited environ- ment allows species to initially multiply at a high rate, 1. BIODIVERSITY and diversify morphologically and ecologically. The fossil record and reconstructions from molecular phylo- For many evolutionary biologists the most important genies show that both speciation and diversification rates pair of questions that need to be answered are: Why do later decline. Experiments in the laboratory with bacteria so many species exist on this planet? And why do they replicate the pattern of diversification through observ- differ so greatly from one another? Species number in the able time. Bacteria respond to ecological opportunity by millions, varying in size from viruses to whales and from diversifying into a maximum number of ecologically algae to trees; varying in color from bright butterflies to differentiated types. dull and cryptic moths; varying in behavior from solitary © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. 560 Speciation and Macroevolution polar bears to highly social honey bees; and varying in adjective is applied because the products of a radiation numerous other ways in exploiting the environment for are conjectured or known to be adapted to exploiting the food, avoiding their enemies, and reproducing. How is environment in different ways. all this variation to be explained? In the last 20 or 30 years the range of extant organ- Adaptive radiations provide rich material for seeking isms that have been studied in detail has increased dra- answers to these questions because they comprise groups matically, owing largely to the availability of molecular of distinctive yet closely related species. An adaptive ra- phylogenies for inferring relatedness among species and diation is the product of differentiation of an ancestral the pattern and rates of diversification. With these stud- species into an array of descendant species that differ in ies has come increasing scrutiny of the term itself, and the way they exploit the environment. When the differ- debate on definitions. Should an unusually high rate of entiation has proceeded rapidly, the evolutionary tran- diversification be an essential ingredient of the defini- sitions from one state to another can readily be char- tion? How is an adaptive radiation to be distinguished acterized and strongly interpreted. from a nonadaptive radiation? These questions become Angiosperm plants, dinosaurs, and marsupial mam- important in comparative studies when generalizations mals are typical examples at high taxonomic levels. are sought across a broad taxonomic range of organ- Typical examples at lower levels are Darwin’s finches on isms. There are no simple answers because there is no the Gala´pagos Islands, honeycreeper finches, Drosoph- clear line of demarcation or break point between adap- ila, spiders, the silversword alliance of plants in the tive radiations—defined by numbers of species, variety Hawaiian archipelago, cichlid fish in the Great Lakes of or rates of diversification—and all others. As used in this Africa, and Anolis lizards in the Caribbean. These ex- chapter the term adaptive radiation is most usefully amples have the following in common: (1) they comprise applied to those groups that have diversified rapidly and several to many species, (2) the species vary morphol- interpretably, such as the ones cited earlier. ogically in conspicuous ways, and relatedly, (3) they oc- cupy a diversity of ecological niches. Most of the species 3. THE ECOLOGICAL THEORY were (4) derived from a single ancestor in their current environment, and (5) most diverged relatively rapidly. By placing the occurrence of fossils within a time frame, Cichlid fish in Lake Malawi are an outstanding example. paleontologists like Simpson were able to detect a pat- Hundreds of species—the exact number is unknown— tern in the history of a radiation. A radiation was seen to were derived from one or a few common ancestors in the begin with rapid multiplication of species as well as di- last 2 million years, and they have diversified into many versification of morphological types. As the radiation trophic forms, including algae-, insect-, snail-, and fish- proceeded, both species proliferation and morpholog- eating specialists. Their mouth and teeth morphologies ical evolution slowed down. The observed pattern gave reflect their diets, and for this reason the variation is in- rise to an inferred process, as follows. Invasion of an ferred to be adaptive, that is to say, the product of diverse underexploited environment allowed species to multiply natural selection. One group alone, the rock-dwelling at a high rate. At the same time they diversified pheno- “Mbuna” of the genus Tropheops, comprises 230 spe- typically and ecologically. Eventually, both speciation cies. Ole Seehausen has calculated that one new species and diversification rates declined as competition in- arose every 46 years! creased for a diminishing variety of unexploited or un- derexploited resources. This is an explicitly ecological interpretation. On one occasion Simpson used T. H. 2. ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPT Huxley’s phrase “filling the ecological barrel” to capture The term adaptive radiation was coined in 1902 by the essence of a limited environment. The greatest op- a paleontologist, H. F. Osborn, and the phenomenon it portunity for occupancy occurs at the beginning, when refers to was popularized by another, G. G. Simpson, the barrel is empty, and by implication there is an in- about 50 years later. Simpson viewed the evolutionary creasing difficulty for newcomers to fit as the barrel fills. radiation of a major group of animals, such as marsupial Dolph Schluter converted a coherent explanation mammals, as various lines of descent from a common into a theory by identifying all the elements and framing ancestor arising more or less simultaneously and diverg- them as hypotheses to be tested by their predictions. The ing in different morphological and ecological directions, key elements of the theory are (1) phenotypic differ- rather like spokes radiating from the hub of a wheel. This entiation caused by natural selection arising from dif- image is powerful yet fails to represent the correct evo- ferences among environments, (2) competition for re- lutionary pathway of bifurcating branches in a treelike sources, and (3) speciation governed by both processes. structure. Nonetheless, the term has stuck. The adaptive The theory is not one to be rejected by the first contrary © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Adaptive Radiation 561 observationsomuchasanorganizationalframeworkfor environments,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Microevolution and the Genetics of Populations ​ ​ Microevolution Refers to Varieties Within a Given Type
    Chapter 8: Evolution Lesson 8.3: Microevolution and the Genetics of Populations ​ ​ Microevolution refers to varieties within a given type. Change happens within a group, but the descendant is clearly of the same type as the ancestor. This might better be called variation, or adaptation, but the changes are "horizontal" in effect, not "vertical." Such changes might be accomplished by "natural selection," in which a trait ​ ​ ​ ​ within the present variety is selected as the best for a given set of conditions, or accomplished by "artificial selection," such as when dog breeders produce a new breed of dog. Lesson Objectives ● Distinguish what is microevolution and how it affects changes in populations. ● Define gene pool, and explain how to calculate allele frequencies. ● State the Hardy-Weinberg theorem ● Identify the five forces of evolution. Vocabulary ● adaptive radiation ● gene pool ● migration ● allele frequency ● genetic drift ● mutation ● artificial selection ● Hardy-Weinberg theorem ● natural selection ● directional selection ● macroevolution ● population genetics ● disruptive selection ● microevolution ● stabilizing selection ● gene flow Introduction Darwin knew that heritable variations are needed for evolution to occur. However, he knew nothing about Mendel’s laws of genetics. Mendel’s laws were rediscovered in the early 1900s. Only then could scientists fully understand the process of evolution. Microevolution is how individual traits within a population change over time. In order for a population to change, some things must be assumed to be true. In other words, there must be some sort of process happening that causes microevolution. The five ways alleles within a population change over time are natural selection, migration (gene flow), mating, mutations, or genetic drift.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Radiation Driven by the Interplay of Eco-Evolutionary and Landscape Dynamics R
    Adaptive radiation driven by the interplay of eco-evolutionary and landscape dynamics R. Aguilée, D. Claessen, A. Lambert To cite this version: R. Aguilée, D. Claessen, A. Lambert. Adaptive radiation driven by the interplay of eco-evolutionary and landscape dynamics. Evolution - International Journal of Organic Evolution, Wiley, 2013, 67 (5), pp.1291-1306. 10.1111/evo.12008. hal-00838275 HAL Id: hal-00838275 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00838275 Submitted on 13 Apr 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Adaptive radiation driven by the interplay of eco-evolutionary and landscape dynamics Robin Aguil´eea;b;∗, David Claessenb and Amaury Lambertc;d Published in Evolution, 2013, 67(5): 1291{1306 with doi: 10.1111/evo.12008 a Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution´ de Montpellier (UMR 5554), Univ Montpellier II, CNRS, Montpellier, France b Laboratoire Ecologie´ et Evolution´ (UMR 7625), UPMC Univ Paris 06, Ecole´ Normale Sup´erieure,CNRS, Paris, France c Laboratoire Probabilit´eset Mod`elesAl´eatoires(LPMA) CNRS UMR 7599, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris, France. d Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology (CIRB) CNRS UMR 7241, Coll`egede France, Paris, France ∗ Corresponding author.
    [Show full text]
  • Reticulate Evolutionary History in a Recent Radiation of Montane
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.12.426362; this version posted January 13, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Reticulate Evolutionary History in a Recent Radiation of Montane 2 Grasshoppers Revealed by Genomic Data 3 4 VANINA TONZO1, ADRIÀ BELLVERT2 AND JOAQUÍN ORTEGO1 5 6 1 Department of Integrative Ecology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC); Avda. 7 Américo Vespucio, 26 – 41092; Seville, Spain 8 2 Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, and 9 Biodiversity Research Institute (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona; Av. Diagonal, 643 – 10 08028; Barcelona, Spain 11 12 13 Author for correspondence: 14 Vanina Tonzo 15 Estación Biológica de Doñana, EBD-CSIC, 16 Avda. Américo Vespucio 26, E-41092 Seville, Spain 17 E-mail: [email protected] 18 Phone: +34 954 232 340 19 20 21 22 Running title: Reticulate evolution in a grasshopper radiation bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.12.426362; this version posted January 13, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 23 Abstract 24 Inferring the ecological and evolutionary processes underlying lineage and phenotypic 25 diversification is of paramount importance to shed light on the origin of contemporary 26 patterns of biological diversity. However, reconstructing phylogenetic relationships in 27 recent evolutionary radiations represents a major challenge due to the frequent co- 28 occurrence of incomplete lineage sorting and introgression.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Radiation
    ADAPTIVE RADIATION Rosemary G. Gillespie,* Francis G. Howarth,† and George K. Roderick* *University of California, Berkeley and †Bishop Museum I. History of the Concept ecological release Expansion of habitat, or ecological II. Nonadaptive Radiations environment, often resulting from release of species III. Factors Underlying Adaptive Radiation from competition. IV. Are Certain Taxa More Likely to Undergo Adap- founder effect Random genetic sampling in which tive Radiation Than Others? only a few ‘‘founders’’ derived from a large popula- V. How Does Adaptive Radiation Get Started? tion initiate a new population. Since these founders VI. The Processes of Adaptive Radiation: Case carry only a small fraction of the parental popula- Studies tion’s genetic variability, radically different gene VII. The Future frequencies can become established in the new colony. key innovation A trait that increases the efficiency with GLOSSARY which a resource is used and can thus allow entry into a new ecological zone. adaptive shift A change in the nature of a trait (mor- natural selection The differential survival and/or re- phology, ecology, or behavior) that enhances sur- production of classes of entities that differ in one or vival and/or reproduction in an ecological environ- more hereditary characteristics. ment different from that originally occupied. sexual selection Selection that acts directly on mating allopatric speciation The process of genetic divergence success through direct competition between mem- between geographically separated populations lead- bers of one sex for mates or through choices made ing to distinct species. between the two sexes or through a combination of character displacement Divergence in a morphological both modes.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Radiation Adaptive Radiation by Prof
    Workshop on Population and Speciation Genomics 2020 W. Salzburger | Adaptive Radiation Adaptive Radiation by Prof. Walter Salzburger Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051 Basel, Switzerland The diversity of life on Earth is governed, at the MACROEVOLUTIONARY scale, by two antagonistic ———————— MACROEVOLUTION processes: Evolutionary radiations increase and extinction events decrease the organismal diversity on our Evolution on the grand scale, that is, planet through time. Evolutionary radiations are termed adaptive radiations if new lifeforms emerge evolution at the level rapidly through the extensive ecological diversification of an organismal lineage. of species and above. Examples of adaptive radiations ECOLOGICAL NICHE The relational position of a species Adaptive radiation refers to the evolution of ecological and morphological disparity within a rapidly or population in an diversifying lineage. It is the diversification of an ancestral species into an array of new species that ecosystem. It includes the interactions of all occupy various ECOLOGICAL NICHES and that differ in traits used to exploit those niches. Adaptive biotic and abiotic radiation includes the origination of both new species (speciation) and phenotypic disparity. factors that determine how a species meets Archetypal examples of adaptive radiations include Darwin’s finches on the Galápagos archipelago; its needs for food and shelter, how it silversword plants on Hawaii; anole lizards on the islands of the Caribbean; threespine stickleback fish survives, and how it in north temperate waters; and cichlid fishes in the East Africa Great Lakes and in various tropical reproduces. crater lakes (see FIGURE 1). Adaptive radiations are also visible in the FOSSIL record. For example, the FOSSIL CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION is considered an adaptive radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Graptoloid Diversity and Disparity Became Decoupled During the Ordovician Mass Extinction
    Graptoloid diversity and disparity became decoupled during the Ordovician mass extinction David W. Bapsta,b,1, Peter C. Bullockc, Michael J. Melchinc, H. David Sheetsd, and Charles E. Mitchellb aDepartment of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; bDepartment of Geology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260; cDepartment of Earth Sciences, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada B2G 2W5; and dDepartment of Physics, Canisius College, Buffalo, NY 14208 Edited by Douglas H. Erwin, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, and accepted by the Editorial Board January 19, 2012 (received for review August 31, 2011) The morphological study of extinct taxa allows for analysis of a HME (Fig. 1), they were driven to extinction during the Hir- diverse set of macroevolutionary hypotheses, including testing for nantian glaciation (7, 15). In contrast, the Neograptina simulta- change in the magnitude of morphological divergence, extinction neously speciated rapidly after the first extinction episode of the selectivity on form, and the ecological context of radiations. Late HME (15). Ordovician graptoloids experienced a phylogenetic bottleneck at The changes in morphological diversity during this interval have the Hirnantian mass extinction (∼445 Ma), when a major clade of not been studied quantitatively. Previous work suggests that only a graptoloids was driven to extinction while another clade simulta- single morphotype survived the HME (16, 17) and that the number neously radiated. In this study, we developed a dataset of 49 eco- of morphotypes recovered in the Silurian. Mitchell (18) demon- logically relevant characters for 183 species with which we tested strated that the Silurian Neograptina evolved a number of mor- i two main hypotheses: ( ) could the biased survival of one grapto- phologies that converged upon pre-Hirnantian diplograptine loid clade over another have resulted from morphological selectiv- forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Radiation Causes
    NEET (/neet/) > NEET Study Material (/neet/neet-study-material/) > NEET Biology (/neet/neet-biology/) > Adaptive Radiation (/neet/important-notes-of-biology-for-neet- adaptive-radiation/) What is adaptive radiation? Adaptive radiation is the evolutionary diversification of many related species from a common ancestral species in a relatively short period. Osborne (1902) coined the term “Adaptive Radiation”. He stated that each large and isolated region, with sufficiently varied topogr aphy, soil, vegetation, climate, will lead to organisms with diverse characteristics. Darwin had called it “Divergence”, i.e. the tendency in an organism descended from the same ancestor to diverge in character as they undergo changes. Adaptive radiation plays a significant role in macroevolution. Adaptive radiation gives rise to species diversity in a geographical area. Adaptiv e Radiation Causes: Adaptive radiation is more common during major environmental changes and physical disturbances. It also helps an organism to successfully spread into other environments. Furthermore, it leads to speciation. Moreover, it also leads to phenotypically dissimilar, but related species. Major causes of adaptive radiation are: Ecological opportunities: When an organism enters a new area with lots of ecological opportunities, species diversify to exploit these resources. When a group of organism enter a new adaptive zone then organisms tend to adapt themselves differently. It results in adaptive divergence An adaptive zone is an unexploited area with numerous ecological opportunities, e.g. nocturnal flying to catch small insects, grazing on the grass while migrating across Savana, and swimming at the ocean’s surface to filter out Plankton Vacant adaptive zones are more common on islands, as fewer species inhabit islands compared to mainland When adaptive zones are empty, they get filled by species, which diversify quickly, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Radiation Versus ‘
    Review Research review Adaptive radiation versus ‘radiation’ and ‘explosive diversification’: why conceptual distinctions are fundamental to understanding evolution Author for correspondence: Thomas J. Givnish Thomas J. Givnish Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA Tel: +1 608 262 5718 Email: [email protected] Received: 7 August 2014 Accepted: 1 May 2015 Summary New Phytologist (2015) 207: 297–303 Adaptive radiation is the rise of a diversity of ecological roles and role-specific adaptations within doi: 10.1111/nph.13482 a lineage. Recently, some researchers have begun to use ‘adaptive radiation’ or ‘radiation’ as synonymous with ‘explosive species diversification’. This essay aims to clarify distinctions Key words: adaptive radiation, ecological between these concepts, and the related ideas of geographic speciation, sexual selection, key keys, explosive diversification, geographic innovations, key landscapes and ecological keys. Several examples are given to demonstrate that speciation, key innovations, key landscapes, adaptive radiation and explosive diversification are not the same phenomenon, and that parallel adaptive radiations. focusing on explosive diversification and the analysis of phylogenetic topology ignores much of the rich biology associated with adaptive radiation, and risks generating confusion about the nature of the evolutionary forces driving species diversification. Some ‘radiations’ involve bursts of geographic speciation or sexual selection, rather than adaptive diversification; some adaptive radiations have little or no effect on speciation, or even a negative effect. Many classic examples of ‘adaptive radiation’ appear to involve effects driven partly by geographic speciation, species’ dispersal abilities, and the nature of extrinsic dispersal barriers; partly by sexual selection; and partly by adaptive radiation in the classical sense, including the origin of traits and invasion of adaptive zones that result in decreased diversification rates but add to overall diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Comparative Methods
    Phylogenetic Comparative Methods Luke J. Harmon 2019-3-15 1 Copyright This is book version 1.4, released 15 March 2019. This book is released under a CC-BY-4.0 license. Anyone is free to share and adapt this work with attribution. ISBN-13: 978-1719584463 2 Acknowledgements Thanks to my lab for inspiring me, my family for being my people, and to the students for always keeping us on our toes. Helpful comments on this book came from many sources, including Arne Moo- ers, Brian O’Meara, Mike Whitlock, Matt Pennell, Rosana Zenil-Ferguson, Bob Thacker, Chelsea Specht, Bob Week, Dave Tank, and dozens of others. Thanks to all. Later editions benefited from feedback from many readers, including Liam Rev- ell, Ole Seehausen, Dean Adams and lab, and many others. Thanks! Keep it coming. If you like my publishing model try it yourself. The book barons are rich enough, anyway. Except where otherwise noted, this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https: //creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. 3 Table of contents Chapter 1 - A Macroevolutionary Research Program Chapter 2 - Fitting Statistical Models to Data Chapter 3 - Introduction to Brownian Motion Chapter 4 - Fitting Brownian Motion Chapter 5 - Multivariate Brownian Motion Chapter 6 - Beyond Brownian Motion Chapter 7 - Models of discrete character evolution Chapter 8 - Fitting models of discrete character evolution Chapter 9 - Beyond the Mk model Chapter 10 - Introduction to birth-death models Chapter 11 - Fitting birth-death models Chapter 12 - Beyond birth-death models Chapter 13 - Characters and diversification rates Chapter 14 - Summary 4 Chapter 1: A Macroevolutionary Research Pro- gram Section 1.1: Introduction Evolution is happening all around us.
    [Show full text]
  • Macroevolutionary Diversification with Limited Niche Disparity in a Species-Rich Lineage of Cold-Climate Lizards Ashley M
    Reaney et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2018) 18:16 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1133-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Macroevolutionary diversification with limited niche disparity in a species-rich lineage of cold-climate lizards Ashley M. Reaney1,3 , Mónica Saldarriaga-Córdoba2 and Daniel Pincheira-Donoso1* Abstract Background: Life diversifies via adaptive radiation when natural selection drives the evolution of ecologically distinct species mediated by their access to novel niche space, or via non-adaptive radiation when new species diversify while retaining ancestral niches. However, while cases of adaptive radiation are widely documented, examples of non-adaptively radiating lineages remain rarely observed. A prolific cold-climate lizard radiation from South America (Phymaturus), sister to a hyper-diverse adaptive radiation (Liolaemus), has extensively diversified phylogenetically and geographically, but with exceptionally minimal ecological and life-history diversification. This lineage, therefore, may offer unique opportunities to investigate the non-adaptive basis of diversification, and in combination with Liolaemus, to cover the whole spectrum of modes of diversification predicted by theory, from adaptive to non-adaptive. Using phylogenetic macroevolutionary modelling performed on a newly created 58-species molecular tree, we establish the tempo and mode of diversification in the Phymaturus radiation. Results: Lineage accumulation in Phymaturus opposes a density-dependent (or ‘niche-filling’) process of diversification. Concurrently, we found that body size diversification is better described by an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck evolutionary model, suggesting stabilizing selection as the mechanism underlying niche conservatism (i.e., maintaining two fundamental size peaks), and which has predominantly evolved around two major adaptive peaks on a ‘Simpsonian’ adaptive landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Patterns of Adaptive Radiation: Evolution of Mating Preferences Sergey Gavrilets and Aaron Vose
    //FS2/CUP/3-PAGINATION/SPDY/2-PROOFS/3B2/9780521883184C07.3D 102 [102–126] 31.7.2008 2:49PM CHAPTER SEVEN Dynamic patterns of adaptive radiation: evolution of mating preferences sergey gavrilets and aaron vose Introduction Adaptive radiation is defined as the evolution of ecological and phenotypic diversity within a rapidly multiplying lineage (Simpson 1953; Schluter 2000). Examples include the diversification of Darwin’s finches on the Gala´pagos islands, Anolis lizards on Caribbean islands, Hawaiian silverswords, a mainland radiation of columbines, and cichlids of the East African Great Lakes, among many others (Simpson 1953; Givnish & Sytsma 1997; Losos 1998; Schluter 2000; Gillespie 2004; Salzburger & Meyer 2004; Seehausen 2006). Adaptive radiation typically follows the colonization of a new environment or the establishment of a ‘key innovation’ (e.g. nectar spurs in columbines, Hodges 1997) which opens new ecological niches and/or new paths for evolution. Adaptive radiation is both spectacular and a remarkably complex process, which is affected by many different factors (genetical, ecological, developmen- tal, environmental, etc.) interweaving in non-linear ways. Different, sometimes contradictory scenarios explaining adaptive radiation have been advanced (Simpson 1953; Mayr 1963; Schluter 2000). Some authors emphasize random genetic drift in small founder populations (Mayr 1963), while others focus on strong directional selection in small founder populations (Eldredge 2003; Eldredge et al. 2005), strong diversifying selection (Schluter 2000), or relaxed selection (Mayr 1963). Identifying the more plausible and general scenarios is a highly controversial endeavour. The large timescale involved and the lack of precise data on its initial and intermediate stages even make identifying general patterns of adaptive radiation very difficult (Simpson 1953; Losos 1998; Schluter 2000; Gillespie 2004; Salzburger & Meyer 2004; Seehausen 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Radiation: Mammalian Forelimbs
    ADAPTIVE RADIATION: MAMMALIAN FORELIMBS The variety of forelimbs - the bat's wing, the sea lion's flipper, the elephant's supportive column, the human's arm and hand - further illustrates the similar anatomical plan of all mammals due to a shared ancestry. Despite the obvious differences in shape, mammalian forelimbs share a similar arrangement and arise from the same embryonic, homologous structures. The mammalian forelimb includes the shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints. The scapula or shoul- der blade connects the forelimb to the trunk and forms part of the shoulder joint. The humerus or upper arm bone forms part of the shoulder joint above, and elbow joint below. The radius and ulna comprise the lower arm bones or forearm, and contribute to the elbow and wrist joints. Finally, the carpal or wrist bones, the metacarpals, and phalanges form the bat wing, the sea lion flipper, the tree shrew, mole, and wolf paws, the elephant foot, and the human hand and fingers. Using light colors, begin with the tree shrew scapula in the center of the plate. Next, color the scapula on each of the other animals: the mole, bat, wolf, sea lion, elephant, and human. Continue coloring the other bones in this manner: humerus, radius, ulna, carpal bones, metacarpals, and phalanges. After you have colored all the structures in each animal, notice the variation in the overall shape of the forelimb. Notice, too, how the form of the bones contributes to the function of the forelimb in each species. The tree shrew skeleton closely resembles that of early mammals and represents the ancestral forelimb skeleton.
    [Show full text]