DOCSLIB.ORG

ESIA) for the Construction of the Transmission and Distribution Lines Along the Laminkoto-Diabugu Corridor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ESIA) for the Construction of the Transmission and Distribution Lines Along the Laminkoto-Diabugu Corridor Public Disclosure Authorized National Water and Electricity Company Government of The Gambia THE GAMBIA ELECTRICITY RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION PROJECT (GERMP) Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) for the Construction of the Transmission and Distribution Lines along the Laminkoto-Diabugu Corridor Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized March 2021 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................................................................................ 6 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................... 34 1.1 Project Background ......................................................................... 34 1.2 Project Development Objective ............................................................ 34 1.3 Rationale for the ESIA ...................................................................... 34 1.4 Methodological Approach .................................................................. 35 CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF THE GERMP.................................................................................. 36 2.1 Components of GERMP..................................................................... 36 2.2 Sub-Project Description and Location ..................................................... 36 2.3 Technical Components of the Project...................................................... 37 2.4 Project Activities ............................................................................ 38 2.5 Assessment of Project Alternatives ........................................................ 38 CHAPTER 3: RELEVANT NATIONAL POLICIES, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS .............. 40 3.1 Relevant National Policies .................................................................. 40 3.2 Legal Framework Relevant to the Project ................................................. 42 3.3 Relevant International Conventions and Agreements .................................... 44 3.4 Institutional Framework .................................................................... 45 3.5 Relevant Bank Policies............................................................................. 46 3.6 Analysis of Gaps between Gambian legislation and Policies of the Banks ..................... 48 CHAPTER 4: DESCRIPTION OF THE BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONDITION OF THE PROJECT CORRIDOR ............................................................................................................ 49 THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................ 49 Climate ...................................................................................................................... 49 Rainfall ...................................................................................................................... 49 Temperature .............................................................................................................. 50 Hydrology .................................................................................................................. 51 Physical Structures: Compounds, Buildings, Schools and Other Infrastructure ....................... 52 THE BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................... 59 Forest Cover of the Project area..................................................................................... 59 Fruit trees and other Vegetation .................................................................................... 60 The Mammalian Fauna ................................................................................................ 61 THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT .............................................................. 64 Demography and Population Along the Line Corridor ........................................................ 64 Disadvantaged and Vulnerable Groups ........................................................................... 66 Gender and Gender-Based Violence (GBV)....................................................................... 66 Access of the Population to Education and Security Services............................................... 68 2 Access of the Population to Health ................................................................................. 68 Access of the Population to Electricity, Telephone Sevices .................................................. 68 Chance Finds and Cultural Heritage and Archaeology ....................................................... 68 LOCATION-SPECIFIC BASELINE CONDITIONS ......................................................... 74 CHAPTER 5: CONSULTAIONS AND AND PBLIC PARTICIPATION.................................................... 84 5.1 Objectives of the Stakeholder Consultations .............................................. 84 5.2 List of Persons Consulted and Views Expressed ........................................... 86 CHAPTER 6: ANALYSES OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS........................... 87 6.1 Principles Used in Evaluating Significance of Potential Impacts .......................... 87 6.2 Potential Positive Impacts......................................................................... 92 6.3 Potential Negative Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........................................... 93 6.3.1The Physical Environment: Potential Negative Impacts and Mitigation measures ................................................................................................................................. 93 6.3.2The Biological Environment: Potential Negative Impacts and Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................................................. 99 6.3.3The Socio-economic Environment: Potential Negative Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................................... 101 6.4 The Potential Cumulative Impacts ...............................................................108 CHAPTER 7: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN............................................ 110 7.1 Matrix on Mitigation of the Identified Potential Impacts ................................110 CHAPTER 8: ESMP IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING ARRANGEMENTS .............................. 132 8.1 Roles and Responsibilities for ESMP Implementation ....................................132 8.2 Specific Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................134 8.3 Institutional Training and Sensitization .........................................................135 8.4 Monitoring .................................................................................136 8.5 Reporting .........................................................................................142 8.6 Environmental Auditing ..........................................................................142 8.7 Budget for Implementation of ESMP ............................................................142 CHAPTER 9: GRIEVANCE MECHANISM.................................................................................. 144 9.1 Grievance and Conflict Resolution ........................................................144 9.2 The Grievance Resolution Committee (GRC) ....................................................144 9.3 Modalities for Conflict Prevention and Resolution to Address Grievances ............145 9.4 The Grievance Process.....................................................................145 CHAPTER 10: CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................... 147 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................. 148 Annex1: List of Persons and Institutions Met......................................................................... 150 Annex 2: Summary of comments and views expressed during the consultations with stakeholders along the proposed line corridor ......................................................................................... 152 Annex 3: Chance Find Procedures ...................................................................156 Annex 4: Modalities of the Proposed Grievance Mechanism ......................................157 Annex 5: Flow Chart of Grievance Process..........................................................158 3 Annex 6: Contract Clauses to be Included in Contractor’s Agreements............................159 Annex 7: Codes of Conduct and Action Plan For Implementing ESHS and OHS Standards, and Preventing Gender Based Violence and Violence Against Children ................................163 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1 Relevant National Polices Table 3.2 Legal Framework Relevant to the Project Table 3.3 Relevant Regional/International Signed/Ratified by The Gambia Table 3.4 Institutional Framework Table 3.5 World Bank Environmental and Social Safeguards relevant to the Project Table 3.6 EIB Environmental and Social Standards
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SCOPE of WORK Sambar Kunda – Kulari Ndimba Road
    Reinforced Access of the most Vulnerable Populations to Markets and Socio – economic Facilities through a Feeder Road Rehabilitation Programme ANNEX C – SCOPE OF WORK Sambar Kunda – Kulari Ndimba Road EUROPEAN UNION NATIONAL ROADS AUTHORITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The ‘Reinforced Access of the Most Vulnerable Populations to Markets and Socio-economic Facilities through a Feeder Roads Rehabilitation Programme’ funded by the European Union Delegation and is being implemented by the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) in The Gambia. It aims to enhance socio-economic developments around road networks, provide employment, increase household income and thereby reduce poverty among vulnerable populations including female headed households and youth in rural Gambia. The rehabilitation of the feeder roads will be achieved through a combination of labour-based methods and machine-based methods. 10 feeder roads with a total of 104.4km have been identified for rehabilitation. The feeder roads are distributed across the North Bank Region, Central River Region and Upper River Region of the country. The selected roads are: • Road 1: Soto Masamba to Numuyel to Trunk Road (Fulladu East, URR), • Road 2: Chamoi to Dampha Kunda to Tamba Sansang (Fulladu East, URR), • Road 3: Alkali Kunda to North Bank Trunk Road (Upper Badibu, NBR), • Road 4: Suduwol to Nyamanari to Fatoto (Kantora, URR), • Road 5: Galleh Manda to South Bank Trunk Road (Fulladu West, CRR), • Road 6: Illiasa to Katchang (Upper Badibou, NBR), • Road 7: Sambar Kunda to Kulari Ndimba (Tumana, URR), • Road 8: Fass to Kerr Jane (Lower Niumi, NBR). • Road 9: Baja Kunda to Boro Kanda Kasseh (Wulli, URR), • Road 10: Kerewan to Njawara (Lower Badibou, NBR) SCOPE OF WORKS This scope of works is for the rehabilitation of Sambar Kunda to Kulari Ndimba road in Tumana and Kantora Districts, Upper River Region of The Gambia.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Land Sector Governance in the Gambia
    Public Disclosure Authorized IMPROVING LAND SECTOR GOVERNANCE IN THE GAMBIA Public Disclosure Authorized Implementation of the Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF) Public Disclosure Authorized AMIE BENSOUDA & CO LP OFF BERTIL HARDING HIGHWAY NO. SSHFC CRESCENT KANIFING INSTITUTIONAL AREA Public Disclosure Authorized KANIFING MUNICIPALITY Email – [email protected] Telephone Nos. 4495381 / 4496453 AUGUST 2013 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgement 3 Acronyms 4 1. Executive Summary 6 1.1 Introduction 6 1.2 LGAF Methodology 6 1.3 Overview of Land Policy Issues in the Gambia 7 1.4 Assessment of Land Governance in the Gambia 11 1.5 Policy Priorities 23 1.6 Conclusion 26 2. Consolidated Scorecard 27 3. Introduction 31 4. Methodology 32 4.1 Adapting the LGAF to the Country Situation 32 4.2 Government Engagement 32 4.3 Collection of Background Data and Panel Workshops 33 5. Context 34 5.1 Geographical Description 34 5.2 Historical Evolution 35 5.35.2 Key Social and Economic Indicators 35 5.4 Administrative Structure 37 5.5 Political System 37 5.6 Land Tenure System 39 5.6.1 Historical Context 39 5.6.2 Freehold Title 39 5.6.3 Leasehold 41 5.6.4 Deemed Lease 41 5.6.5 Customary Tenure 41 5.6.6 Forests Parks, Wild Life Reserves and Land Acquired for Public Purposes 42 5.6.7 Area and Population by Tenure Type 42 6. Tenure Typology 43 6.1 Institutional Map 49 6.2 Urban Planning 55 6.3 Three Growth Centres of Brikama, Farafenni and Basse 56 6.4 The Tourism Development Area (TDA) 56 6.5 Forestry 57 6.6 Current Situation 57 7.
    [Show full text]
  • MOBILE LEGAL AID CLINIC REPORT 7Th to 12Th April 2014
    80 OAU Boulevard, Banjul, The Gambia TEL: 4201535/4201537/3960636/9960633 Website: www.legalaid.gov.gm EMAIL: [email protected] MOBILE LEGAL AID CLINIC REPORT 7th to 12th April 2014 MOBILE LEGAL AID CLINIC REPORT Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................3 2. Project Sensitization.........................................................................................................5 3. Implementation of the Mobile Legal Aid Clinic ............................................................5 A. Upper River Region ....................................................................................................5 I. Kantora District ................................................................................................5 II. Fuladu East, Basse District………………………………………………………………………..7 a) Basse Police Station………………….………………………………….……………..8 b) Mansanjang Kunda……...……………………………………………….9 III. Tumana District ..............................................................................................10 a) Chamoi…………………………….…………………………...……….10 b) Follow up with the Governor on issues raised………..…….….……….11 B. North Bank Region……………...………………………………………………………………12 I. Sabachsanjal District….……………..………..…………………………………………….12 a) Dibbakunda………………………………………………….……………13 b) Radio Program…………………………………..….…………………….……..13 II. Central Badibu District….………………………..….……………………………………..…14 a) Farafenni Police Station……………………………...……..………………………..……..15
    [Show full text]
  • Gambia/Civil Society/UN Rapid Joint Assessment of the Impact of the Heavy Rains and Floods in the Gambia
    Government of The Gambia/Civil Society/UN Rapid Joint Assessment of the Impact of the Heavy Rains and Floods in The Gambia September 2010 Acknowledgment The RJA Team thanks the Governor’s and Mayor’s Offices as well as the Regional Disaster Management Committees in the six regions for guiding the sub-teams during their field visits. The Team also thanks all the village and/or community members who took their time to speak to the Team and participated in the interviews and discussions. Acronyms BCC Banjul City Council CRR Central River Region EmOC Emergency Obstetric Care FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation GBOS Gambia Bureau of Statistics IDP Internally Displaced Person KMC Kanifing Municipal Council LRR Lower River Region NBR North Bank Region NDMA National Disaster Management Agency NERICA New Rice for Africa NFI Non-Food Item NGO Non-Governmental Organisation ORS Oral Rehydration Solution PHC Primary Health Centre RH Reproductive Health RJA Rapid Joint Assessment RDMC Regional Disaster Management Committee STI Sexually Transmitted Infection UNCT United Nations Country Team UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund URR Upper River Region VDC Village Development Committee WFP World Food Programme WHO World Health Organisation WR Western Region Cover photography: Flooded city centre of Basse (URR) 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Tonga in the Gambia, Guinea and Sierra Leone
    15-15 WORKSHOP IN POLITICAL THEORY AND POLICY ANALYSIS 513 NORTH PARK INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON, IN 47408-3895 U.S.A. Resiliency and Change in Common Property Regimes in West Africa: The Case of the Tonga in The Gambia, Guinea and Sierra Leone Mark Schoonmaker Freudenberger Aiah R. Lebbie Judith Carney The International Association for I The Study of Common Property Fifth Common Property Conference "Reinventing the Commons 24-28 May, 1995 Bode, Norway Figure 1: Map of Case Study Sites Atlantic SENEGAL Ocean SENEGAL 1. Font Jarrol District 2. Klang West District I 3. Upper Baddibou District MAURITANIA 4. Sami District 5. Sandu District 6. Upper Guinea Region 7. Middle Guinea Region THE GAMBIA 8. Moyamba District IVORY COAST I GHANA I Resiliency and Change in Common Property Regimes in West Africa: The Case of the Tongo in The Gambia, Guinea and Sierra Leone Mark Schoonmaker Freudenberger1 Aiah R. Lebbie Judith Carney I. Introduction The African commons are valuable though often ecologically threatened sources of food and fiber products for urban and rural populations. Particularly around resources of great use Iand exchange value, rural communities in many parts of West Africa create rules and conventions to define rights of access and conditions of sustainable use. Recent case studies highlight the considerable rule-making capacity of West African rural institutions despite the erosion of rural authority required to enforce sanctions (Berry,, 1988; IFAD, 1992; Shepard, 1991; Thomson, 1992). Many of these local-level tenure regimes create community protected areas - common property regimes that regulate access to forest commons, sacred groves, fishing ponds, and grazing areas (Price, 1991; Fischer, 1994; Djibo et al., 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • The Gambia All Schools Tree Nursery Competition
    The Gambia All Schools Tree Nursery Competition: Promoting Conservation in The Gambia Through Grassroots Environmental Education By Francisca E. Paulete A REPORT Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN FORESTRY MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2006 This report, “The Gambia All Schools Tree Nursery Competition: Promoting Conservation Through Grassroots Environmental Education,” is hereby approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN FORESTRY. School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science Signatures: Advisor _______________________________________ Dr. Blair D. Orr Dean _________________________________________ Dr. Margaret R. Gale Date _________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ……………………………………………………………………… ii LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………………..... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ………………………………………………………………... iv ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………………….. vi LIST OF ACRONYMS USED ......…………………………………………………............ viii CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………….. 1 CHAPTER 2 – BACKGROUND OF THE GAMBIA …………………………………..…….. 4 General Description ………………………………………………………...... 4 Climate & Topography ……………………………………………………..... 6 History of The Gambia ………………………………………………………. 7 Colonial Control & Slavery ………………………………………………..… 10 Government & Political Conditions ……………………………………….… 12 Economy & Resources ……………………………………………………...... 14 The People ……………………………………………………………………. 15 Environmental Status ….……………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Plan of Operation for Field Testing of FMPRG
    Gambian Forest Management Concept (GFMC) 2nd Version Draft May 2001 Compiled by Werner Schindele for Department of State for Fisheries, Natural Resources and the Environment Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH DFS Deutsche Forstservice GmbH II List of Abbreviations AC Administrative Circle AOP Annual Plan of Operations B.Sc. Bachelor of Science CCSF Community Controlled State Forest CF Community Forestry CFMA Community Forest Management Agreement CRD Central River Division DCC Divisional Coordinating Committee DFO Divisional Forest Officer EIS Environmental Information System FD Forestry Department FP Forest Parks GFMC Gambian Forestry Management Concept GGFP Gambian-German Forestry Project GOTG Government of The Gambia IA Implementation Area JFPM Joint Forest Park Management LRD Lower River Division MDFT Multi-disciplinary Facilitation Teams M&E Monitoring and Evaluation NAP National Action Programme to Combat Desertification NBD North Bank Division NEA National Environment Agency GEAP Gambia Environmental Action Plan NFF National Forest Fund NGO Non Government Organization PA Protected Areas PCFMA Preliminary Community Forest Management Agreement R&D Research and Development URD Upper River Division WD Western Division III Table of Contents List of Abbreviations Foreword Introduction 1 The Nucleus Concept of the GFMC 4 1.1 Status of GFMC and Relation to other Plans 4 1.2 Long-term Vision 4 1.3 Objectives, Principles and Approach 5 1.3.1 Objectives 5 1.3.2 Principles 5 1.3.3 Approach 6 1.4 Forest Status and
    [Show full text]
  • Atelier Sur Les Systèmes Fonciers Et La Desertification
    IDRC CRDI AAV GILD 70r C A N A D A . CMA o v o' V"y 3 A (Ic ARCHIV 103536 10 ) (0 wI)RC - Ub' Atelier sur le foncier et la d6sertification 7 au 9 Mars 1994, Dakar - SENEGAL Liste des Participants Nom/Institution Ali Abaab CIHEAM-IAM Montpellier BP 5056 34033 Montpellier. Francd Tel :(33) 67046000 Fax : (33) 67542527 Boubakar Moussa Ba Comite Inter-Etats de Lutte contre la Secheresse au Sahel CILSS BP 7110 Ouagadougou. Burkina Faso Tel : (226) 31 26 40 Fax (226) 31 08 68 Mamadou Ba CRDI BP 11007 CD Annexe Dakar. S6n6gal Tel :(221)24 42 31 Fax :(221)25 35 55 Andr6 Bathiono ICRISAT BP 12404 - Niamey Tel : (227) 72 25 29 Fax :(227) 73 43 29 .Abdoulaye Bathily Ministre de 11environnement et de la Protection de la Nature Building Administratif 4° etage Dakar Senegal Jacques Bilodeau Ambassadeur du Canada 45, Bd de la Republique Dakar Senegal Tel (221) 23 92 90 Fax (221) 23 54 90 Mohamed Boualga Organisation africaine de cartographie et t616d6tection 40, Bd Mohamed V Alger, Alg6rie Tel (213-2) 61 29 64 Fax (213-2) 77 79 38 G6rald Bourrier Directeur Regional/CRDI BP 11007 CD Annexe Dakar, S6n6gal Tel (221) 24 09 20 Fax (221) 25 32 55 Alioune Camara CRDI Dakar BP 11007 CD Annexe Dakar, S6n6gal Tel (221) 24 09 20 Fax (221) 25 32 55 Madeleine Ciss6 Comite National du CILSS Rue Parchappe x Huart Dakar, S6n6gal Tel : (221) 21 24 61 Mamadou Cissoko FONGS BP 269 - Thies S6n6gal Tel (221) 51 12 37 Fax (221) 51 20 59 Michael Cracknell ENDA Inter Arabe Cite Venus bloc 2 El Menzah VII 1004, Tunis Tunisie T&l : (216-1) 75 20 03/76 62 34 Mamadou Daff6 Organisation
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralized Evaluation for Evidence for Evaluation Decentralized
    BASED DECISION MAKING DECISION BASED - Prepared DECENTRALIZED EVALUATION FOR EVIDENCE FOR EVALUATION DECENTRALIZED Decentralized Evaluation Gambia DEV 200327: Establishing the Foundation for a Nationally Owned Sustainable School Feeding Programme in the Gambia From 2012 to 2017 Evaluation Report August 2018 The WFP Gambia Country Office Evaluation Manager: MamYassin Ceesay Prepared by Cristina Murphy, Team Leader Aubert Fret, team member Falie C.K. Baldeh, team member Juan Camilo Prieto, team member Acknowledgements The evaluation team wishes to thank the WFP team at the CO in Banjul for their availability and their support during this evaluation. The ET is also grateful to the various responsible persons and staff members it met at the Ministry of Basic and Secondary Education who were equally helpful. The evaluation team also acknowledges the assistance and contributions received from the RED personnel in the various regions, as well as from the school personnel in the different schools it visited. The ET found all persons met to be very cooperative and motivated and wishes to thank them all very sincerely. The ET wishes to express its hope that the present evaluation report may contribute in a significant way to the strengthening of the ongoing process to transform the present SFP in The Gambia into a truly sustainable and nationally owned school feeding programme. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this report are those of the Evaluation Team, and do not necessarily reflect those of the World Food Programme. Responsibility for the opinions expressed in this report rests solely with the authors. Publication of this document does not imply endorsement by the WFP regarding the opinions expressed hereinafter.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Household Survey 2010 in the Gambia
    Government of The Gambia INTEGRATED HOUSEHOLD SURVEY INCOME AND EXPENDITURE POVERTY ASSESSMENT-2010 Gambia Bureau of Statistics December 2011 PART TWO TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations .......................................................................................................... V Concepts and Definitions ................................................................................................................ VI Preface............................................................................................................................................. IX Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ XI Key Findings ............................................................................................................................... XI Recommendations .................................................................................................................... XIV Chapter 1: Methodology of the analysis of The Gambia IHS 2010 ............................................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Objectives of the survey ................................................................................................................ 1 Sampling methodology ................................................................................................................. 2 The survey
    [Show full text]
  • YEP Mini Grant Scheme Success Stories
    YEP MINI GRANT SCHEME 10 ENTREPRENEURS’ STORIES TO INSPIRE YOU Kebba Tiyana Mam S. Danso Amet Faal Isatou Jobe Dawda Kah Muhammed Bobb Adama Bittaye Muhammed Sanneh Bubacarr Jaiteh Masamba Ceesay 1 ebba Tiyana is a native of Tankong other two are female. He was able to maintain Kunda, Sami District, Central River the four staff in his farm after receiving the KRegion North and a young farmer Youth Empowerment Project (YEP project) aged 29. Mini Grant to the tune of D47, 000.00. Tiyana Mr. Tiyina is the founder said that the support and manager of Tiyana’s from the YEP Mini Grant Organic Farm Enterprise. “I am honored and Scheme enabled him to He is into vegetable happy to be one of fence his farm and this will production both in the dry the YEP Mini Grant help him to increase his and rainy season in his production this year. “This native village. awardees and my year- 2018 rainy season, During the dry season, Mr life has significantly I am expecting a bumper Tiyina cultivates pepper, harvest. I’m expecting onion and cabbage while improved for the D60, 000.00 from my in the rainy season; he reason that I have water melon, D35, 000.00 is into cassava, maize, benefitted from the from my cassava and D29, potatoes and water 000.00 from the potato,” melon production. Mini Grant.” he asserted. He earns a decent living Last year, he explained through farming thus supports himself and that he had a problem with his garden his family with some basic needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Education / Gross Enrolment Rate (GER)
    Education / Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) Table 123.1: LBE, Historical Trend - Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) - BOYS Region / District (Pop. Census 2003) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Banjul 110 105 111 111 125 126 137 137 Kanifing 108 109 110 107 108 110 110 114 Foni Bintang 90.9 88.2 91.8 94.2 100 106 100 99.8 Foni Bondali 85.9 75.9 85.5 77.8 83.6 87.0 92.2 97.0 Foni Brefet 121 120 116 140 116 118 106 109 Foni Jarrol 92.7 87.7 77.5 72.6 103 104 98.2 103 Foni Kansalla 112 97.0 105 127 109 110 112 114 Kombo Central 98.1 96.0 109 112 113 118 117 121 Kombo East 94.1 97.6 94.5 110 120 115 119 119 Kombo North 81.3 79.7 82.7 84.5 92.7 96.9 99.7 105 Kombo South 107 107 112 122 125 134 134 135 Central Badibou 92.8 92.4 98.2 98.9 118 126 126 138 Jokadu 77.4 76.1 79.7 81.7 88.7 88.4 99.6 97.8 Lower Badibou 96.6 100 124 131 127 140 155 155 Lower Niumi 99.3 100 94.0 96.0 103 106 106 109 Upper Badibou 73.9 70.7 77.5 80.0 91.4 110 118 120 Upper Niumi 76.9 78.0 80.0 80.2 79.1 83.1 83.9 89.3 Jarra Central 71.5 68.2 70.4 103 101 107 115 143 Jarra East 73.8 68.9 67.0 76.0 77.1 76.1 71.6 74.0 Jarra West 97.6 91.6 92.8 95.8 92.7 92.2 98.1 103 Kiang Central 127 104 103 109 109 109 103 110 Kiang East 98.4 92.1 93.0 104 98.8 98.4 102 107 Kiang West 138 116 121 116 116 114 115 115 Fulladu West 52.2 49.7 52.1 56.0 58.4 60.0 63.5 64.7 Janjanbureh 103 101 120 116 108 107 95.7 105 Lower Saloum 56.4 55.2 56.8 54.7 60.5 60.8 68.7 77.5 Niamina Dankunku 85.6 62.0 68.5 60.9 66.8 62.1 75.5 100 Niamina East 45.3 40.3 39.2 43.2 45.1 48.4 53.5 62.4 Niamina West 71.7 59.6
    [Show full text]