T.C. Firat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Tarih Anabilim Dali Malazgirt Öncesi Kafkasya'da Türk Varliği

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

T.C. Firat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Tarih Anabilim Dali Malazgirt Öncesi Kafkasya'da Türk Varliği T.C. FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI MALAZGİRT ÖNCESİ KAFKASYA'DA TÜRK VARLIĞI DOKTORA TEZİ DANIŞMAN HAZIRLAYAN Prof. Dr. M. Beşir AŞAN Zekiye TUNÇ ELAZIĞ - 2012 T.C. FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANA BİLİM DALI MALAZGİRT ÖNCESİ KAFKASYA'DA TÜRK VARLIĞI DOKTORA TEZİ DANIŞMAN HAZIRLAYAN Prof. Dr. M. Beşir AŞAN Zekiye TUNÇ Jürimiz, ………tarihinde yapılan tez savunma sınavı sonunda bu yüksek lisans / doktora tezini oy birliği / oy çokluğu ile başarılı saymıştır. Jüri Üyeleri: 1. Prof. Dr. 2. 3. 4. 5. F. Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yönetim Kurulunun …... tarih ve …….sayılı kararıyla bu tezin kabulü onaylanmıştır. Prof. Dr. Erdal AÇIKSES Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürü II ÖZET Doktora Tezi Malazgirt Öncesi Kafkasya’da Türk Varlığı Zekiye TUNÇ Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Tarih Anabilim Dalı Genel Türk Tarihi Bilim Dalı Elazığ – 2012, Sayfa: XVI+176 Kafkasya Karadeniz ile Hazar Denizi arasında doğu-batı paralelinde uzanan ve yüksekliği orta kısımlarda beş bin metreyi aşan bölgeye verilen addır. Kuzey-güney ve doğu-batı yollarının birleştiği bölgede olması nedeniyle etnik açıdan farklı kavimlerin uğrak yeri olmuştur. Türkler, Kafkasya’ya ana yurtları olan Asya’dan gelmişlerdir. Kafkasya bölgesinde M.Ö.4000’lere tarihlenen bozkır kültürünü temsil eden kurganların Asya’dan gelen göçerler tarafından oluşturulduklarına dair çalışmalar yapılmıştır. M.Ö.2000’lere gelindiğinde Proto-Türk olarak kabul edilen kabilelerin Kafkasya bölgesine geldikleri ve miladın başlarına kadar burada hâkim oldukları görülmüştür. Kronolojik olarak bakıldığında M.Ö.2000 yıllarının başlarından M.Ö.8. yy’a kadar Kimmerlerin, M.Ö.8. yy’dan M.Ö.2.yy’la kadar İskitlerin, sonrasında ise Sarmatların aynı coğrafyada varlıkları tespit edilmiştir. Milatın başlangıcından itibaren sırasıylaAlan, Hun, Bulgar, Sabir, Avar, Göktürk Türk kavimlerinin varlığı, miladın yedinci yüzyılına gelindiğinde ise Hazar devletinin Kafkasya’da kurulduğu görülmektedir. 10. yy’a gelindiğinde Hazar Devleti gücünü kaybedince Türkler burada zayıflıyor. 11. yy başlarından itibaren ise Kıpçakların etkili olmamakla birlikte varlıklarının tespit edilmesinin yanı sıra asıl güç olarak Selçukluları görmekteyiz. III Bunlar 1010 yıllarından itibaren Kafkasya akınlarına başlayıp 1071’e kadar da devam etmişlerdir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Kafkasya, Kimmer, İskit, Sarmat, Alan, Hun, Bulgar, Sabir, Avar, Göktürk, Hazar, Kıpçak, Selçuk, Türk. IV ABSTRACT Doctorate Thesis Turkish existence in Caucasus before Malazgirt Zekiye TUNÇ Fırat University Institute of Social Sciences Department of History General Turkish History Elaziğ – 2012, Page: XVI+176 Caucasia is the name of the region that lies between Black Sea and Caspian Sea in the east-west parallel and its elevation exceeds five thousand meters in the middle sections. It was a frequented place for tribes that have different ethnic features, since it is located in a region where north-south and east-west routes join with each other. Turks have come to Caucasia from their homeland Asia. Studies have been made which show that cairns representing moorland culture and dated to B.C.4000 are constituted by migrants coming from Asia. It is seen that in B.C.2000 tribes accepted as Proto-Turk came to Caucasia and predominated the land till the beginning of the milestone. Chronologically existence of Cimmerians from the beginning of B.C.2000 till B.C. 8th century, and Scythians from B.C.8th century till B.C.2nd century and later on existence of Sarmatians are determined. Existence of Turkish tribes being Alans, Huns, Bulgars, Sabirs, Avars, and Gokturks in chronological order is observed starting from the beginning of the milestone, and it is seen that Khazar Empire is established in Caucasia in the A.D. seventh century. Turks began to fall into decline when Khazar Empire started to lose power in the 10th century. We see Seljukians as the major power besides the existence of Kipchaks starting from the beginning of 11th century, even though they are not so influential. They started raids to Caucasia starting from 1010’s and continued until 1071. Key Words: Caucasia, Cimmerians, Scythians, Sarmatians, Alans, Huns, Bulgars, Sabirs, Avars, Gokturks, Khazars, Kipchaks, Seljukians, Turks. V İÇİNDEKİLER ÖZET .............................................................................................................................. II ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... IV İÇİNDEKİLER .............................................................................................................. V HARİTALAR LİSTESİ ............................................................................................ VIII ÖNSÖZ ........................................................................................................................... X KISALTMALAR ........................................................................................................ XII KONU VE KAYNAKLAR ........................................................................................ XIII GİRİŞ ............................................................................................................................... 1 BİRİNCİ BÖLÜM 1. ESKİ DÖNEMLERDEN MİLADA KADAR KAFKASYA’DA TÜRKLER ..... 13 1.1. M.Ö. IV. Binyılından II. Binyıla Kafkasya’da Türkler ........................................ 13 1.1.1. Sümer-Türk İlişkilerinin Kafkasya Açısından Değerlendirilmesi ................. 16 1.2. M.Ö. II. Binyıldan M.S. II. yy’a Kadar Kafkasya’da Türkler .............................. 20 1.2.1. Kimmerler ...................................................................................................... 20 1.2.1.1. Arkeolojik Veriler Işığında Kimmer Bozkır Kültürü .............................. 28 1.2.2. İskitler ............................................................................................................ 30 1.2.2.1.İskit Coğrafyasında Kafkasya’nın Yeri .................................................... 32 1.2.3. Sarmatlar ........................................................................................................ 41 İKİNCİ BÖLÜM 2. MİLATTAN VII. YY’A KADAR KAFKASYA’DA TÜRK KAVİMLERİ ........ 45 2.1. Alanlar .................................................................................................................. 45 2.1.1. Kafkasya’da Alanlar....................................................................................... 48 2.2. Hunlar ................................................................................................................... 49 2.3.Bulgarlar ................................................................................................................ 55 2.3.1. Bulgarların Kafkasya’ya Yerleşmeleri ve Siyasi Durumları ......................... 61 2.4. Sabirler ................................................................................................................. 65 2.5. Avarlar .................................................................................................................. 69 2.6. Göktürkler ............................................................................................................. 73 VI ÜÇÜNCÜ BÖLÜM 3. KAFKASYA COĞRAFYASINDA HAZAR DEVLETİ (VII-X. YY’LAR ARASI) ........................................................................................................................... 75 3.1. Hazarlar ................................................................................................................ 75 3.1.1. Hazarların Kafkasya Coğrafyasındaki Konumları ......................................... 79 3.1.1.1. Hazar-Arap İlişkileri ................................................................................ 83 3.1.1.1.1. Emeviler Dönemi Arap-Hazar İlişkileri ............................................ 86 3.1.1.1.1.1. Mesleme Dönemi ........................................................................ 86 3.1.1.1.1.2. Cerrah b. Abdullah el-Hakemî .................................................... 87 3.1.1.1.1.3. Mesleme’nin İkinci Dönemi ....................................................... 88 3.1.1.1.1.4. Cerrah b. Abdullah el-Hakemi’nin İkinci Dönemi ..................... 90 3.1.1.1.1.5. Said İbn Amr el-Haraşî Dönemi ................................................. 90 3.1.1.1.1.6. Mesleme’nin Üçüncü Dönemi .................................................... 91 3.1.1.1.1.7. Mervan b. Muhammed Dönemi .................................................. 92 3.1.1.1.2. VIII. yy’da Abbasi-Hazar İlişkileri ................................................... 95 3.1.1.1.2.1. El-Mansur Dönemi ...................................................................... 95 3.1.1.1.2.2. El-Mehdi Dönemi........................................................................ 97 3.1.1.1.2.3. Harun Er-Reşid Dönemi .............................................................. 97 3.1.1.1.3. IX. yy’da Abbasi-Hazar İlişkileri ...................................................... 99 3.1.1.1.3.1. El-Memûn Dönemi...................................................................... 99 3.1.1.1.3.2. El-Mutasım Dönemi .................................................................. 100 3.1.1.1.3.3. El-Vâsık Dönemi ....................................................................... 101 3.1.1.1.3.4. El-Mütevekkil Dönemi.............................................................. 101 3.1.1.1.4. X. yy’da Abbasi-Hazar İlişkileri ....................................................
Recommended publications
  • Black Sea-Caspian Steppe: Natural Conditions 20 1.1 the Great Steppe
    The Pechenegs: Nomads in the Political and Cultural Landscape of Medieval Europe East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450–1450 General Editors Florin Curta and Dušan Zupka volume 74 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ecee The Pechenegs: Nomads in the Political and Cultural Landscape of Medieval Europe By Aleksander Paroń Translated by Thomas Anessi LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. Publication of the presented monograph has been subsidized by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the National Programme for the Development of Humanities, Modul Universalia 2.1. Research grant no. 0046/NPRH/H21/84/2017. National Programme for the Development of Humanities Cover illustration: Pechenegs slaughter prince Sviatoslav Igorevich and his “Scythians”. The Madrid manuscript of the Synopsis of Histories by John Skylitzes. Miniature 445, 175r, top. From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository. Proofreading by Philip E. Steele The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://catalog.loc.gov/2021015848 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazar Türkçesi Ve Hazar Türkçesi Leksikoloji Tespiti Denemesi
    HAZAR TÜRKÇESİ VE HAZAR TÜRKÇESİ LEKSİKOLOJİ TESPİTİ DENEMESİ Pınar Özdemir* Özet Eski Türkçenin diyalektleri arasında sayılan Hazar Türkçesi ma- alesef ardında yazılı eserler bırakmamıştır. Çalışmamızda bilinenden bilinmeyene metoduyla hareket ede- rek ilk önce mevcut Hazar Türkçesine ait kelimeleri derleyip, ortak özelliklerini tespit edip, mihenk taşlarımızı oluşturduk. Daha sonra Hazar Devleti’nin yaşadığı coğrafyada bu gün yaşayan Türk hak- larının dillerinden Karaçay-Malkar, Karaim, Kırımçak ve Kumuk Türkçelerinin ortak kelimelerini tespit ettik. Bu ortak kelimelerin de leksik ve morfolojik özelliklerini belirledikten sonra birbirleriyle karşılaştırıp aralarındaki uyumu göz önüne sererek Hazar Türkçesi Leksikoloji Tespitini denedik. Anahtar Kelimeler : Hazar, Karaçay-Malkar, Karaim, Kırımçak, Kumuk AbstraCt Unfortunately there is not left any written works behind Khazar Turkish which is deemed to be one of the dialects of old Turkish. In our work primarily key voices, forms and the words of Khazar Turkish have been determined with respect to the features of voice and forms of the existing words remaining from that period. Apart from these determined key features it have been determined the mu- tual aspects of Karachay-Malkar, Karaim, Krymchak and Kumuk Turkish which are known as the remnants of Khazar and it has been intended to reveal the vocabulary of Khazar Turkish. Key Words : Khazar, Karachay-Malkar, Karaim, Kırımchak, Ku- muk Önceleri Göktürk Devletine bağlı olan Hazar Hakanlığı bu devletin iç ve dış savaşlar neticesinde yıkıldığı 630–650 yılları arasındaki süreçte devlet olma temellerini atmıştır. Kuruluşundan sonra hızla büyüyen bu devlet VII. ve X. yüzyıllar arasında Ortaçağın en önemli kuvvetlerinden biri halini almıştır. Hazar Devleti coğrafi sınırlarını batıda Kiev, kuzeyde Bulgar, güneyde Kırım * [email protected] Karadeniz Araştırmaları • Kış 2013 • Sayı 36 • 189-206 Pınar Özdemir ve Dağıstan, doğuda Hārezm sınırlarına uzanan step bölgelerine kadar ge- nişletmiştir (Golden 1989: 147).
    [Show full text]
  • KHAZAR TURKIC GHULÂMS in CALIPHAL SERVICE1 Arab
    KHAZAR TURKIC GHULÂMS IN CALIPHAL SERVICE1 BY PETER B. GOLDEN Arab — Khazar relations, in particular their military confrontations for control of the Caucasus, have long been the subject of investigation. As a consequence of that sustained period of military encounters, the Khazars enjoyed a fierce reputation in the Islamic world. Thus, al-Balâd- hurî, in his comments on the massacre of some of the populace of MawÒil (Mosul) in the aftermath of the ‘Abbâsid takeover in 133/750, says that “because of their evil, the people of Mosul were called the Khazars of the Arabs.”2 Much less studied is one of the side-products of those wars: the presence of Khazars in the Caliphate itself. As with other peoples captured in warfare or taken or purchased on the periphery of the Caliphate, the Khazars in the Islamic heartlands were largely, but not exclusively, used as professional military men, slave-soldiers of the Caliphs, usually termed ghilmân (sing. ghulâm, lit. “boy, servant, slave”3). The relationship of these aliens to the larger Arab and Arabized 1 I would like to thank Michael Bates and Matthew Gordon for their thoughtful read- ings of this paper. Needless to say, I alone am responsible for any remaining errors or failure to take their advice. An earlier, non-updated Russian version of this article (“Khazarskie tiurkskie guliamy na sluzhbe Khalifata) is in press in Moscow, to be pub- lished in Khazary, Trudy Vtorogo Mezhdunarodnogo kollokviuma, ed. by I.A. Arzhant- seva, V.Ia. Petrukhin and A.M. Fedorchuk. 2 This passage is cited and translated in C.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Operation Between the Viking Rus' and the Turkic Nomads of The
    Csete Katona Co-operation between the Viking Rus’ and the Turkic nomads of the steppe in the ninth-eleventh centuries MA Thesis in Medieval Studies Central European University Budapest May 2018 CEU eTD Collection Co-operation between the Viking Rus’ and the Turkic nomads of the steppe in the ninth-eleventh centuries by Csete Katona (Hungary) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ Chair, Examination Committee ____________________________________________ Thesis Supervisor ____________________________________________ Examiner ____________________________________________ Examiner CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2018 Co-operation between the Viking Rus’ and the Turkic nomads of the steppe in the ninth-eleventh centuries by Csete Katona (Hungary) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ External Reader CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2018 Co-operation between the Viking Rus’ and the Turkic nomads of the steppe in the ninth-eleventh centuries by Csete Katona (Hungary) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ External Supervisor CEU eTD Collection Budapest May 2018 I, the undersigned, Csete Katona, candidate for the MA degree in Medieval Studies, declare herewith that the present thesis is exclusively my own work, based on my research and only such external information as properly credited in notes and bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • (8-13Th C.): Contributing to a Reassessment List of Images
    Ethnicity and Statehood in Pontic-Caspian Eurasia (8-13th c.): Contributing to a Reassessment Alex M. Feldman 2018 PhD Thesis – University of Birmingham – Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies List of Images Figure 1: Reproduced from Androshchuk, 2015, “Byzantine Imperial Seals in Southern Rus’,” 43-54: a typical example of “Nordic” rune-writing. Figure 2: Reproduced from Callmer, 2000, “From West to East. The Penetration of Scandinavians into Eastern Europe ca. 500-900,” 45-94: the riverine urbanization and sedentarization of Khazaria. Figures 3-13: A collection of archaeological material dating to the Khazarian period and correlating either with Khazarian “wares” or products typical of the correlative Saltovo-Majacki archaeological culture, which includes glass and bead jewellery found at the Dimitrievskij Complex (top left and center – reproduced from Zalesskaja, et al., 1989, Съкровище на хан Кубрат, cat. nos. 198-203), silver strap ornaments found in Taman (top right – reproduced from Leskov, 2008, The Maikop Treasure, cat. no. 275), and numerous finds from Sarkel, including several silver and bronze belt buckles (bottom right – reproduced from Zalesskaja, et al., 1989, cat. nos. 230 and 275) and even one entire ornamentally carved silver belt itself (reproduced from Pletnëva and Makarova, 1983, “Пояс знатного воина из Саркела,” 62-77, and Artamonov, 1962, История хазар, 340, although Artamonov interprets the find as “Hungarian,” without qualifying his statement), a silver and glass ring (bottom center-right – reproduced from Zalesskaja, et al., 1989, cat. no. 267), as well as imported luxury goods including a Byzantine-made glazed serving plate (center left – reproduced from Zalesskaja, et al., 1989, cat.
    [Show full text]
  • Khazar Empire Koestler
    go Arthur Koestler. The thirteenth tribe. The collapse of the Khazar Empire and its Heritage ------------------------------------------ ARTHUR KOESTLER THE THIRTEENTH TRIBE THE KHAZAR EMPIRE AND ITS HERITAGE HUTCHINSON OF LONDON, LONDON 1976 publishing "Eurasia" St. Petersburg 2001 OCR Sergei Vasil ------------------------------------------ For assistance in the implementation of the publication of this book publishing "Eurasia" thanks Kiprushkina Vadim Albertovich Scientific editor: Yurchenko AG Arthur Koestler. The thirteenth tribe. The collapse of the Khazar Empire and its Heritage. Trans. from English. Kabalkina AY - SPb .: Publishing Group "Eurasia", 2001. - 320 p. Arthur Koestler found an original response to the ideology of anti- Semitism. According to him opinion, the fall of the Khazar khanate spawned several waves of migration, constituting the main core of the population professing Judaism in Eastern Europe. Since ethnic migrants from the Khazars were not Semites, it is untenable and anti-Semitism. Drawing on texts for Arab travelers ninth and tenth centuries. Byzantine sources, "Tale of Bygone Years", works Artamonov Kokovtsov Toynbee, Vernadsky, Dunlop, Kucera, Poles and many others historians, the author provides several different vision of the formation and collapse of Khazar state. Other accents becomes paradoxical at first view the choice of faith. A fascinating study of the history of the Khazar khanate, throughout its existence was under the cross countervailing pressure state, religious and political interest will not leave the reader indifferent, for history, for getting up Koestler pages of the book, does not tolerate indifference. Publisher "Eurasia" is grateful to the publisher Hutchinson & Co (Publishers) Ltd for reporting that the rights to the Arthur Koestler work are regarded as public domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Empires of the Silk Road: a History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze
    EMPIRES OF THE SILK ROAD A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the Present 5 CHRISTOPHER I. BECKWITH PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS Princeton and Oxford Copyright © 2009 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cata loging- in- Publication Data Beckwith, Christopher I., 1945– Empires of the Silk Road : a history of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the present / Christopher I. Beckwith. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978- 0- 691- 13589- 2 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Asia, Central–History. 2. Europe, Eastern—History. 3. East Asia—History. 4. Middle East—History. I. Title. DS329.4.B43 2009 958–dc22 2008023715 British Library Cata loging- in- Publication Data is available Th is book has been composed in Minion Pro. Printed on acid- free paper. ∞ press.princeton.edu Printed in the United States of America 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 CONTENTS 5 preface vii a c k n o w l e d g m e n t s x v abbreviations and sigla xvii introduction xix prologue: The Hero and His Friends 1 1 Th e Chariot Warriors 29 2 Th e Royal Scythians 58 3 Between Roman and Chinese Legions 78 4 Th e Age of Attila the Hun 93 5 Th e Türk Empire 112 6 Th e Silk Road, Revolution, and Collapse 140 7 Th e Vikings and Cathay 163 8 Chinggis Khan and the Mongol Conquests 183 9 Central Eurasians Ride to a Eu ro pe an Sea 204 10 Th e Road Is Closed 232 11 Eurasia without a Center 263 12 Central Eurasia Reborn 302 epilogue: Th e Barbarians 320 appendix a: Th e Proto- Indo- Eu ro pe ans and Th eir Diaspora 363 appendix b: Ancient Central Eurasian Ethnonyms 375 endnotes 385 bibliography 427 index 457 This page intentionally left blank PREFACE 5 Th is book presents a new view of the history of Central Eurasia and the other parts of the Eurasian continent directly involved in Central Eurasian history.
    [Show full text]
  • And Post-Soviet Literature and Culture
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Russia Eternal: Recalling The Imperial Era In Late- And Post-Soviet Literature And Culture Pavel Khazanov University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Eastern European Studies Commons, English Language and Literature Commons, European History Commons, and the European Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Khazanov, Pavel, "Russia Eternal: Recalling The Imperial Era In Late- And Post-Soviet Literature And Culture" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2894. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2894 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2894 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Russia Eternal: Recalling The Imperial Era In Late- And Post-Soviet Literature And Culture Abstract The return of Tsarist buildings, narratives and symbols has been a prominent facet of social life in post- Soviet Russia. My dissertation aims to explain this phenomenon and its meaning by tracking contemporary Russia’s cultural memory of the Imperial era. By close-reading both popular and influential cultural texts, as well as analyzing their conditions of production and reception, I show how three generations of Russian cultural elites from the 1950s until today have used Russia’s past to fight present- day political battles, and outline how the cultural memory of the Imperial epoch continues to inform post- Soviet Russian leaders and their mainstream detractors. Chapters One and Two situate the origin of Russian culture’s current engagement with the pre-Revolutionary era in the social dynamic following Stalin’s death in 1953.
    [Show full text]
  • Imparator Konstantinos Vii
    AŞT I AR IRM AS A Y LA N R Ü I D 2018 / K MAYIS - HAZİRAN T ALİ AHMETBEYOĞLU R D Ü CİLT: 119 SAYI: 234 A T DE ADMİNİSTRANDO İMPERİO ADLI ESERİN TÜRK TARİHİ İÇİN ÖNEMİ SAYFA: 109-126 Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları Mayıs - Haziran 2018 TDA Cilt: 119 Sayı: 234 Sayfa: 109-126 Geliş Tarihi: 25.05.2018 Kabul Tarihi: 12.06.2018 İMPARATOR KONSTANTİNOS VII. PORPHYROGENNETOS’UN DE ADMİNİSTRANDO İMPERİO ADLI ESERİNİN TÜRK TARİHİ İÇİN ÖNEMİ* Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Ali AHMETBEYOĞLU** Öz Bizans İmparatoru Konstantinos VII. Prophyrogennetos’a ait olan De Admi- nistrando İmperio (İmparatorluk İdaresi Hakkında) adlı eser, Bizans’ın harici siyaseti ile yabancı ülkeler ve milletler hakkında bilgi veren son derece mühim bir kaynaktır. Konstantinos, siyaset ve jeopolitik bir kitap olan De Administ- rando İmperio’yu kendisinden sonra İmparator olan oğlu II. Romanos’a hita- ben, devlet idaresinde rehberlik etmesi için halk Grekçesi ile yazmıştır. Özellik- le Bizans İmparatorluğu’nun komşularını tanıtarak, temeline devrinin önemli bir gücü ve kendileri için tehdit unsuru olan Peçenekleri koyarak nasıl bir dış siyaset izlemesi gerektiğine dair pratik bilgiler vermiştir. Eserin 949-952 yıl- ları arasında yazıldığı ve malzemesinin çeşitli kimseler vasıtasıyla toplandığı düşünülmüştür. 53 babdan oluşan eserde; Bizans İmparatorluğu’nun X. asır- daki doğu, batı, kuzey komşuları hakkında tarihî, coğrafî, etnografik bilgiler verilmekte ve onlara karşı nasıl bir politika izlenmesi gerektiği vurgulanmakta- dır. Eser, muhtelif kavimler ile Doğu Avrupa coğrafyasındaki Hazarlar, Uzlar,
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY of RUSSIA All Risplits Resejt'ed
    HANDBOUND AT THE UNlVtRSITY OF Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/historyofrussia01kliu :iS^7 1 A HISTORY OF RUSSIA All risplits reseJT'ed. 1 ^ :^ A // HISTORY ^/RUSSIA BY V. O. KLUCHEVSKY LATE PROFESSOR OF RUSSIAN HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF MOSCOW TRANSLATED BY C. J. HOGARTH ^^^'^' X K\/pc, pycCKOM iicrQ^i^m(j:u>aKuiii<^oi VOLUME ONE LONDON: J. M. DENT ^ SONS, LTD. NEW YORK: E. P. BUTTON ^ CO. 191 DK Ho Printed by Ballantyne, Hanson &• Co. At the Ballantyne Press, Edinburgh — -V CONTENTS CHAPTER I PAGE The two points of view in the study of history— The principal factor in the development of Russian social life —The iour principal periods of Russian history —The Ancient Chronicle ; its genesis, authorship, and contents . I CHAPTER n Historical value of the Ancient Chronicle— Its importance for later Russian historians—A chronological error—The origin of that error—The work of compiling the Chronicle—Defects in the older versions—The theory of Slavonic unity—Manuscripts of the twelfth century—The divergent points of view of their authors 19 CHAPTER III Principal factors of the first period of Russian history —The two theories as toils starling-point—The races who inhabited Southern Russia before the coming of the Eastern Slavs—The Ancient Chronicle's tradition concerning the dispersal of the Slavs from the Danube—Jornandes on their distribution during the sixth century—The military union of the Eastern Slavs in the Carpathians—The period and peculiar features of their settlement of the Russian plain— Results of that settlement ......
    [Show full text]
  • Steppe Empires? the Khazars and the Volga Bulgars
    chapter 9 Steppe Empires? The Khazars and the Volga Bulgars Common opinion used to have it that the defeat by Charles Martel of a Muslim army near Tours in 733 or 734 was a decisive moment in world history marking the halting of the northward spread of Islam. Similarly, historians used to praise the Khazars for rescuing (Eastern) Europe from complete Islamization. The Khazars were believed to have blunted the Arab advance through the Caucasus Mountains and to have fought them to a standstill. Before the 13th or 14th cen- tury, Islam did not therefore move beyond the Caucasus range.1 The conversion of the Khazars to Judaism has also attracted attention, a lot more than any other event in their more than 200-year long history. To be sure, that conver- sion was not unique in history, if one thinks, for example, of the Yemenite Jews of 6th-century Himyar. But in a world obsessed with inventing traditions, the Khazars are now viewed as ancestors of the East European Jewry, of those who perished in the Holocaust and of some of those who founded the state of Israel in 1948. The idea, first put forward by Ernest Renan in the late 19th century, was largely made popular in the 20th century by Arthur Koestler: “the large majori- ty of surviving Jews in the world is of Eastern Europe—and thus perhaps main- ly of Khazar origin.” To Koestler, a journalist, the “story of the Khazar Empire … begins to look like the most cruel hoax which history has ever perpetrated.”2 A historian, the Israeli president Yitzhak Ben-Zvi (1952–1963) went even further.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Russia, 980–1584
    This page intentionally left blank Medieval Russia, 980–1584 This revised edition is a concise, yet comprehensive, narrative of the history of Russia from the reign of Vladimir I the Saint, through the reign of Ivan IV the Terrible. Supplementing the original edition with results of recently published scholarship as well as her own research, Janet Martin emphasizes the dynamics of Russia’s political evolution from the loose federation of principalities known as Kievan Rus through the era of Mongol domination to the development of the Muscovite state. Her analyses of the ruling dynasty and of economic influences on political development, and her explorations of society, foreign relations, religion, and culture provide a basis for understand- ing the transformations of the lands of Rus. Her lines of argument are clear and coherent; her conclusions and interpretations are provoca- tive. The result is an informative, accessible, up-to-date account that will be of interest to both students and specialists of early Rus. janet martin is Professor of History at the University of Miami. She has published widely in the field of medieval Russian history, on topics ranging from economic history to Muscovite–Tatar relations. Her monograph Treasures of the Land of Darkness: The Fur Trade and Its Significance for Medieval Russia (Cambridge) was published in 1986. Cambridge Medieval Textbooks This is a series of introductions to important topics in medieval history aimed primarily at advanced students and faculty, and is designed to complement the monograph series Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought. It includes both chronological and thematic approaches and addresses both British and European topics.
    [Show full text]