September 2014

Review and Update of the

Railway Development Strategy 2000

Public Engagement Report

Agreement No. CE 35/2010 (CE)

AECOM in association with MVA Ltd.

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 Background of the Study ...... 1 1.2 Study Focus and Methodology ...... 4 1.3 Structure of the Report ...... 6 2. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROGRAMME...... 7 2.1 Purpose of Public Engagement ...... 7 2.2 Overview ...... 7 3. OVERALL SUMMARY OF VIEWS ON KEY TOPICS ...... 9 3.1 Overview ...... 9 3.2 Broad Principles ...... 9 3.3 Comprehensive Review of Roles of Different Public Transport Modes ...... 11 3.4 Principles of Railway Development ...... 11 3.5 Funding of Railway Development ...... 12 3.6 Methods to Increase Patronage and Enhance Railway Service ...... 12 3.7 Hong Kong-Shenzhen Western Express Line (WEL) ...... 14 3.8 Northern Link (NOL) ...... 18 3.9 to Link (TMTWL) ...... 21 3.10 (NIL) ...... 24 3.11 Line (SSWL) ...... 28 3.12 (West) (SIL(W)) ...... 31 3.13 (TMS Extension) ...... 35 3.14 Station (HSK Station) ...... 38 3.15 West Extension (TCW Extension) ...... 40 3.16 Station (KTU Station) ...... 42 4. CONCLUSION AND WAY FORWARD ...... 45

Page i Setember 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Appendices Appendix I – Dissemination of Information about the PE Exercise

Appendix II – Public Engagement Activities

Appendix III – Other Suggestions from the Public on the Ten Proposed Railway Schemes during Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the Public Engagement Exercise Other Suggestions from the Public on New Railway Proposals during Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the Public Engagement Exercise

Page ii Setember 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

1.1.1 The Government commissioned AECOM Asia Company Limited (the consultant) in March 2011 to carry out a Review and Update of the Railway Development Strategy 2000 (RDS-2000). The objective of the study is to update the long-term railway development blueprint formulated in the RDS-2000 having regard to the latest development of our society.

1.1.2 When the RDS-2000 was announced in May 2000, only six railway lines and the Light Rail were operating in Hong Kong (see Fig. 1.1). To implement the policy of using railways as the backbone of Hong Kong’s passenger transport system, the local railway network expanded rapidly with eight railway projects completed between 2002 and 2009.

1.1.3 Currently, the total number of daily public transport passenger trips in Hong Kong exceeds 10 million. Hong Kong’s railway network carries over 4.5 million passengers per day, accounting for about 38% of all public transport passenger trips. The Government is taking forward five railway projects in full swing. They are the West Island Line, South Island Line (East), Line Extension, Hong Kong Section of the Guangzhou- Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link, and Shatin to Central Link (see Fig. 1.2). These five railway projects are expected to be commissioned in succession between the end of 2014 / early 2015 and 2020 / 2021. Upon completion, the total length of railways in Hong Kong will be increased to more than 270 km. There will be 99 railway stations and 68 Light Rail stations, serving areas inhabited by more than 70% of the local population and forming an easily accessible mass transit network. It is anticipated that the rail share of local public transport trips will increase to 43%, which further underlines the Government’s policy of using railways as the backbone of the passenger transport system.

Page 1 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

1.1.4 As stated by the Chief Executive in the Policy Address in January 2013, public demand for land is generated as much from the surging population as from people’s aspirations for more space to alleviate their cramped living conditions. The Government will continue to adopt a multi-pronged approach and step up its efforts to meet housing and other needs. For this purpose, the Government will increase the supply of land in the short, medium and long term through optimal use of developed land and identifying new land for development at the same time. Amongst these measures, some longer-term ones include planning the North East New Development Areas (NENT NDAs) and Hung Shui Kiu New Development Area (HSK NDA), developing the New Territories North and (including conducting the Tung Chung New Town Extension Study to explore the potential of developing Tung Chung into a new town with more comprehensive and better developed community facilities), reviewing the deserted agricultural land in North District and etc., with a view to building up a “land reserve” to meet future demands in a timely manner and improve the living environment of the citizens.

1.1.5 Development of railway transport will not only significantly speed up passenger flow, alleviate road traffic congestion and reduce vehicle- induced air pollution, but also release the development potential of peripheral areas and facilitate local developments and economic activities. If railway planning and land development can be properly integrated, there would be synergy in broadening the living space for residents and promoting developments in various aspects in Hong Kong.

Page 2 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Fig. 1.1: Hong Kong’s Railway Network in 2000

Fig. 1.2: Hong Kong’s Railway Network in 2021

Page 3 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

1.2 Study Focus and Methodology

1.2.1 In general, our study and consultation work were conducted in two stages, with a view to recommending a new railway development blueprint that was fast, convenient, reliable, environmental friendly and could meet the needs of the society.

1.2.2 For the Stage 1 Study, we conducted passenger transport demand forecasts and reviewed the demand for major railway corridors serving key development areas. The three major regional railway corridors (see Fig. 1.3) are

ƒ The Hong Kong-Shenzhen Western Express Line ƒ The Northern Link ƒ The Coastal Railway between Tuen Mun and Tsuen Wan (Tuen Mun to Tsuen Wan Link)

Fig. 1.3: Major Regional Corridors proposed in the Stage 1 Study ġ

Page 4 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

1.2.3 The Stage 2 Study focused on optimisation and integration of the railway network and study of local enhancement schemes to increase the overall capacity of the railway network and reduce road-based transport needs. The seven local enhancement schemes (see Fig. 1.4) are:

ƒ The North Island Line ƒ The Siu Sai Wan Line ƒ The South Island Line (West) ƒ The Tuen Mun South Extension ƒ The ƒ The Tung Chung West Extension ƒ The Kwu Tung Station

Fig. 1.4: Local Enhancement Schemes proposed in the Stage 2 Study

Page 5 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

1.2.4 Upon completion of the Stage 2 PE exercise, we collated the public opinions at both stages, such that the planning of the major regional corridors and local enhancement schemes could be further optimised in a comprehensive manner. We would provide the Government with recommendations on future railway development which served as the basis for the formulation of the future railway development strategy in Hong Kong.

1.3 Structure of the Report

1.3.1 This report summarises views and suggestions received from the public through different channels during the PE period. A short summary is provided on the conclusion and way forward for formulating the railway development strategy for Hong Kong.

Page 6 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

2. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROGRAMME

2.1 Purpose of Public Engagement

2.1.1 Railway projects involve enormous investment of public funds and have profound impact on society, people’s livelihood and economic development. Therefore, different sectors of the society may offer diverse views. The issue on how to cohesively integrate railway planning and land development will need to be examined within the community of Hong Kong.

2.1.2 It often takes eight to ten years for a railway project to take shape from idea formulation, conceptual stage, stakeholder consultation, detailed design, to actual construction and completion. Early consultation will enable the public to discuss and participate in the planning process, so that the Government can work together with the public to map out Hong Kong’s future railway development to meet transport demand in a cost- effective manner. This will facilitate the commencement of relevant detailed studies of individual projects in a timely manner.

2.2 Overview

2.2.1 Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the PE exercise were conducted from 20 April to 21 July 2012 and from 21 February to 20 May 2013 respectively. At the commencement of each stage of the PE exercise, various forms of publicity were launched to raise public awareness of the study. PE publications and a website were prepared to enable the public to gain a better understanding of the study background, preliminary study findings, and conceptual schemes of the major regional railway corridors as well as local enhancement schemes.

Page 7 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

2.2.2 Various forms of media, including website, on-line forum, email and other communication channels such as hotline, fax and post were used as platforms for the public to provide views, comments and suggestions on different railway schemes. Details of the various means used in information dissemination are summarised in Appendix I.

2.2.3 To facilitate public engagement and encourage interaction, a range of PE activities were organised. They included eight Public Forums, four Focus Group Meetings, over 30 briefing sessions to District Councils and Heung Yee Kuk as well as meetings with academics, professionals and business sectors. Details of these PE activities are summarised in Appendix II.

2.2.4 ġ Over 11,600 written submissions were received during the two stages of PE exercise. Verbal comments were also received at the public forums, focus group meetings and through the hotline. The numbers of entries received through different communication channels during each stage of the PE exercise are summarised in the table below:

No. of Entries Received During Communication Channels Stage 1 PE Stage 2 PE Email 115 663 Fax 74 19 Post 35 4,482 Other Written Submission 32 2,018 Website Post 1,209 2,956 Online Forum 20 19 Total 1,485 10,157

Page 8 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3. OVERALL SUMMARY OF VIEWS ON KEY TOPICS

3.1 Overview

3.1.1 In the course of the PE exercise, 8 Public Forums, 4 Focus Group Meetings and over 30 briefing sessions were held. Over 11,600 written submissions and many verbal comments were received.

3.1.2 The study proposals were generally welcomed by the public. Overall views on the proposals are presented below –

3.2 Broad Principles

3.2.1 The public generally agreed that railway should be the backbone of the passenger transportation system in Hong Kong and supported the Government’s effort in planning for a strategic railway network and land use development in an integrated manner. The majority agreed that population distribution, land use planning and housing development were key factors in determining the alignment and feasibility of new railway development. Some professionals and scholars suggested that the study team should comprehensively review the whole Railway Development Strategy with other ongoing plans and studies, such as the “Enhancing Land Supply Strategy”, to provide strategic insights for Hong Kong’s future development.

3.2.2 Some scholars and green groups suggested that ecological and environmental impact, carbon emissions and socio-economic impact of railway proposals should be studied to understand the net environmental and social gains to the community in addition to the economic benefits derived from the new railway projects.

Page 9 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.2.3 Many professionals and scholars considered that the user-pay and cost- recovery principles would no longer be applicable and a decreasing rate of return for railway proposals was expected because the demand for future railways would be based on social needs rather than economic growth. Some suggested that, since capital investment from the Government would be required for new railway development, the Government should treat future railway development as public works projects so that the considerations of accessibility and connectivity would be prioritised ahead of financial returns.

3.2.4 The general public, professionals and scholars suggested that more information on the estimated cost, time saving, patronage, technical feasibility, overall environmental performance as well as cost-benefit analysis for different schemes should be made available for their consideration.

3.2.5 The majority also pointed out that the average train loading figures in the PE Digest might not be able to truly reflect the congestion in train compartments during peak hours. As shown in the PE Digest, the average train loading during peak hours in some sections was around 60% to 70%, but from passengers’ perspective, the train compartments were very full and unpleasant. They suggested that the figures on design capacity should be reviewed.

Page 10 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.3 Comprehensive Review of Roles of Different Public Transport Modes

3.3.1 Many members of the public, professionals and scholars suggested that a new Comprehensive Transport Study should be carried out to define the roles of different public transport modes; to determine the priority of developing different types of modes; and to study how multimodal integration and connections between modes could be carried out. Some professionals and scholars, as well as transport operators opined that competition among different public transport modes should be allowed, and overemphasis on railway development might lead to misallocation of resources which would in turn increase the operation cost for both the MTR Corporation Limited (MTRCL) and other road-based transport operators and eventually the burden of the general public.

3.3.2 While it was generally agreed that railway should continue to serve the highly demanded corridors, many operators of road-based public transport modes had strong reservations about providing new railways to serve corridors with medium or low traffic demand.

3.4 Principles of Railway Development

3.4.1 The majority agreed that land use and transport should be planned in an integrated manner, and new developments should be concentrated to a smaller number of new areas with a higher density to enhance the connectivity of less accessible areas and the viability of the railway service. Some respondents opined that “Transit-Oriented Development” should be promoted to further increase the patronage. However, some professionals and scholars expressed that the new developments should not be triggered solely to support railway development, as consideration should also be given to urban morphology and overall future planning. Besides, the social and environmental impact of high density development should be carefully assessed.

Page 11 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.4.2 Some professionals and scholars pointed out that the current practice of railway planning was transport-demand driven or traffic-congestion-relief driven and as a result the proposed new railway lines were converging towards the traditional Central Business Districts (CBDs) and might cause congestion there. They suggested that new railway planning should be growth-demand driven and the future railways should facilitate the shifting of business functions from traditional CBDs to new towns in the North West New Territories (NWNT), or other new development areas, such as East and West Kowloon Cultural District, so that future developments would be more evenly distributed and decentralised, and more job opportunities would be created in these new development areas.

3.5 Funding of Railway Development

3.5.1 The majority considered that if new railway lines were not financially viable, subsidy by the Government or from other railway lines might be considered. However, some suggested that suitable forms of railways or other types of public transport modes, such as medium capacity railways, Bus , electric buses etc., should also be considered as alternatives in the long term.

3.6 Methods to Increase Patronage and Enhance Railway Service

3.6.1 The public suggested that the Government should aim at providing a fast and affordable public transportation system. Some professionals suggested that railway should not be built to serve the peak hour traffic demand only. Measures should be taken to enhance the average utilisation of the railways. In this regard, many suggested that different concession schemes, such as “monthly pass” for different lines, greater fare reduction at “MTR Fare Saver” or more concession schemes for the elderly and people with disabilities, should be explored.

Page 12 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.6.2 Some scholars and professionals opined that since the existing railway network had already covered a lot of developed areas, the increase in ridership and catchment by new railway lines or stations would be limited. Therefore, the marginal benefit of developing new railway lines might not justify the cost. In this regard, they suggested that more efforts should be made to enhance the feeder services to existing stations to increase the usage of existing railway lines.

3.6.3 Some members of the public and professionals suggested that the pedestrian connection around railway stations should be improved to increase the patronage of existing railway lines. Examples include: from Central Station to the new waterfront, from Exhibition Station to the district, from to Admiralty, from to Station, from Station to Happy Valley, from to Victoria Park, from Austin Station to Kowloon Station and , etc.

3.6.4 Some members of the public suggested that park-and-ride service should be enhanced at railway stations in order to encourage more bicycle riders to use the railway service. There were suggestions that pets and bicycles should be allowed on train compartments and more should be done to improve services for the elderly and the disabled.

Page 13 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.7 Hong Kong-Shenzhen Western Express Line (WEL)

Fig. 3.1: Preliminary Conceptual Scheme of the WEL

The following key consultation points were provided in the PE materials to facilitate public participation.

In your opinion, how may the Main Line and Cross Boundary Spur Line of the WEL be planned to facilitate Hongġ Kong residents travelling to the western Shenzhen and other areas?

What are your views regarding the Domestic Spur Line connecting Tuen Mun and Siu Ho Wan proposed by the consultant? If technically feasible, where do you think the Domestic Spur Line should connect at each end?

Page 14 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Why?

In your opinion, how should the three components of the WEL proposed by the consultant (i.e. the Main Line, Cross-boundary Spur Line and Domestic Spur Line) be phased for development if the WEL is to be implemented?

In general, under what circumstances would you support the implementation of the WEL? Why?

Overview

3.7.1 Some members of the public supported the WEL because it would enhance economic development, while many others considered that the WEL should be supported only if there was a strong traffic demand.

3.7.2 There were mixed views on the three components and the phasing of the WEL. Some suggested that priority should be given to the Domestic Spur Line which was considered more beneficial to local residents. On the other hand, some public views showed support to implement all three components together, which would enhance the connection between Hong Kong and Shenzhen and make the WEL more viable and cost-effective. A number of professionals and scholars and some members of the public supported the railway corridor to link up the Shenzhen Bao’an International Airport, Qianhai, Hung Shui Kiu, Tuen Mun and the Hong Kong International Airport.

Page 15 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Main Line

3.7.3 Although some agreed on the need for the railway line, there were doubts on the cost-effectiveness of the Main Line. Some suggested that a station at Hung Shui Kiu or Tuen Mun should be built to enhance the financial viability of the Main Line.

3.7.4 Many members of the public and some professionals and scholars expressed concern on the market demand of the Main Line, and suggested that it should be implemented only if there were clear division of labour and agreement between the Shenzhen Bao’an International Airport and the Hong Kong International Airport to ensure the latter could be operated as an air transit hub.

Cross-boundary Spur Line

3.7.5 Some members of the public supported the Cross-boundary Spur Line as they considered that it could enhance the connection between Hong Kong and Qianhai to facilitate economic development in the NWNT. Many professionals and scholars considered that the patronage and demand for the Cross-boundary Spur Line would likely be higher than the Main Line, and it should thus be given the top priority among the three components.

3.7.6 Some professionals and scholars suggested that the Cross-boundary Spur Line or the Domestic Spur Line would provide opportunities for developing Hung Shui Kiu or Tuen Mun as new economic and social centres in the NWNT, which would encourage economic growth and create employment.

3.7.7 However, some were worried that there might not be sufficient patronage, and therefore suggested that it should also connect to or Tuen Mun, or the three components of the WEL should be combined into one to enhance the overall financial viability.

Page 16 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Domestic Spur Line

3.7.8 Some members of the public, professionals and scholars suggested connecting the Domestic Spur Line to Tuen Mun South and the so as to facilitate north-south movement in the New Territories and link up the West Rail Line and the . Some suggested that railway connection between Tuen Mun and Lantau Island should be provided to enhance the tourism development of Lantau Island.

3.7.9 Some members of the public considered that the Domestic Spur Line to Tung Chung might not be necessary as the current public transport services were sufficient.

Environmental Considerations

3.7.10 A number of green group expressed concern on the potential ecological impact of the construction of the WEL. They were worried that it might affect the ecologically sensitive wetlands in the Deep Bay area and marine ecology near Urmston Road between Tuen Mun and the Hong Kong International Airport, where Chinese White Dolphins were found.

Page 17 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.8 Northern Link (NOL)

Fig. 3.2: Preliminary Conceptual Scheme of the NOL

3.8.1 The following key consultation points were provided in the PE materials to facilitate public participation.

Do you think that the NOL should be more focused on supporting the NDAs (i.e. the NOL connecting with the Lok Spur Line at Kwu Tung), or facilitating cross-boundary passengers to travel to the Mainland (i.e. connecting with the Spur Line at Lok Ma Chau)? Why?

Should the NOL be implemented, do you agree that the development density of the rural areas along the railway should be increased at the same time, in order to render the NOL more cost-effective and make better use of land resources with efficient transport facilities? Why?

In general, under what circumstances would you support the implementation of the NOL? Why?

Page 18 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

If the patronage of the NOL is inadequate to support its operation financially, should it be subsidised by the Government or from other railway lines? Are there any other funding methods?

Overview

3.8.2 The general public supported early implementation of the NOL to enhance east-west connection in the New Territories and cross-boundary traffic. The majority considered that the NOL would form a loop by connecting the West Rail Line and the to enhance connectivity. In general, the public, professionals and scholars were optimistic towards the financial viability of the NOL. In case of insufficient patronage to support its financial viability, some members of the public supported subsidy by the Government, or cross-subsidy by other railway lines.

Functions of the NOL

3.8.3 There were diverse public views on the functions of the NOL and whether the NOL should be connected to Kwu Tung or Lok Ma Chau.

3.8.4 Many members of the public considered that the NOL should connect to Kwu Tung to support the development of NDAs and enhance the east- west connection in the New Territories. Some members of the public, professionals and scholars regarded the NOL as an effective solution to relieve the crowdedness of the East Rail Line. Some members of the public suggested that connecting the NOL to Kwu Tung would allow future extensions to North and Ping Che/ to support the developments there. However, some local residents living in those areas opposed to such extensions since they were worried that the local community would be severely affected.

3.8.5 From a regional perspective, some professionals, scholars and members of the public preferred connecting the NOL to Lok Ma Chau to facilitate people travelling between the NWNT and Shenzhen and help divert cross- boundary passengers from the East Rail Line.

Page 19 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.8.6 Some members of the public considered that the NOL should support the development of NDAs, enhance the east-west connection in the New Territories and facilitate cross-boundary transportation, and therefore suggested that the NOL should connect to both Kwu Tung and Lok Ma Chau. There were also suggestions that the NOL should connect to instead of .

Development Density

3.8.7 Many members of the public agreed that development density of the rural area along the railway could be increased to enhance the cost- effectiveness of the NOL. However, in view of the potential impact on wetland areas along the alignment, some respondents and green groups opposed to the increase of development density of these areas.

3.8.8 Some respondents also suggested that stations should be added at , and to facilitate future developments.

3.8.9 Some respondents and local residents who had reservations about the development of NDAs considered that there was no need to develop the NOL to serve the NDAs.

Environmental Considerations

3.8.10 There were concerns that the development of the NOL might destroy the environment and speed up urbanisation in the rural area. Some green groups expressed concern on the impact of the NOL on ecologically sensitive areas along its alignment, including Mai Po Nature Reserve, fishponds, wetlands, egretry and agricultural farm lands. They urged the Government to protect the existing natural environment and adhere to the “No Net Loss on Wetland” principle when implementing the NOL.

Page 20 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.9 Tuen Mun to Tsuen Wan Link (TMTWL)

Fig. 3.3: Preliminary Conceptual Scheme of the TMTWL

3.9.1 The following key consultation points were provided in the PE materials to facilitate public participation.

The development density of the coastal area along Tuen Mun to Tsuen Wan is not high. Should the TMTWL be implemented, do you think that the development density along the railway should be increased at the same time, in order to render the TMTWL more cost-effective and make better use of the associated lands? Why?

In general, under what circumstances would you support the implementation of the TMTWL?

If the patronage of the TMTWL is inadequate to support its operation financially, should it be subsidised by the Government of from other railway lines? Are there any other funding methods?

Page 21 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Overview

3.9.2 The TMTWL was supported by some residents in Tuen Mun and Tsuen Wan, as they considered that it would relieve the traffic congestion in the districts and facilitate land, residential and economic development along the coastline between Tuen Mun and Tsuen Wan.

3.9.3 However, the general public and many professionals and scholars considered that the TMTWL would have a low demand and should be considered only when the capacity of the West Rail Line was saturated. At present, the West Rail Line, bus and ferry services were adequate to serve the existing population. Some further pointed out that, after the upgrading and widening of Tuen Mun Road and Road, the 22-minute TMTWL could not compete well with the point-to-point bus service currently serving the same corridor, and thus the demand for the TMTWL would be limited. The respondents generally considered that the TMTWL would not be cost-effective due to its limited patronage and local demand.

3.9.4 Green groups and some residents along the coastal area did not support the TMTWL as it would cause negative landscape and visual impact to the scenic coast.

Further Extensions of the TMTWL

3.9.5 Some members of the public suggested that increasing the development density along the railway line by carrying out reclamation or developing tourism industry would be able to increase the patronage of the TMTWL. However, some residents along the coastal area between Tuen Mun and Tsuen Wan had reservations about these proposals and preferred maintaining the low development density along the coastal area.

Page 22 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.9.6 There were many suggestions on enlarging the service catchment of the proposed alignment to make the TMTWL more attractive. Some proposed to connect the TMTWL to Shatin or Tai Wai, or to the East Rail Line, West Rail Line, or Tung Chung Line. Some others suggested that extensions to Tuen Mun Pier, , Lai King, Kwai Chung or Tsing Yi could also be considered.

Alternatives to the TMTWL

3.9.7 In view of the insufficient patronage and potential environmental and visual impact, some professionals and members of the public suggested that the TMTWL should be built in tunnels, and some suggested that other types of public transport modes, such as ferry service, Bus Rapid Transit, system and automated people mover, should be considered. Some members of the public suggested that extending the West Rail Line to Tuen Mun South would be able to serve the demand in Tuen Mun.

Page 23 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.10 North Island Line (NIL)

Fig. 3.4 Preliminary Conceptual Scheme of the “Swap” Scheme of North Island Line

Fig. 3.5: Preliminary Conceptual Scheme of the “Interchange” Scheme of North Island Line

Page 24 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.10.1 The following key consultation points were provided in the PE materials to facilitate public participation.

If the North Island Line is to be implemented, would you prefer the “Swap” Scheme or “Interchange” Scheme? Do you have other suggestions?

In general, under what circumstances would you support the implementation of the North Island Line along the north shore of the ? Why?

Overview

3.10.2 The general public supported the NIL and believed that it would relieve the congested Island Line by diverting passengers to use the new railway line. However, some respondents had reservations about the NIL as it would further intensify commercial development on the north shore of the Hong Kong Island, leading to more pollution and traffic congestion.

3.10.3 While the NIL was generally supported by the public, preferences on the “Swap” and “Interchange” Schemes were divided. Many professionals and scholars suggested that more information on the travel patterns of passengers, cost and benefit analysis and time savings of the two schemes should be provided.

Page 25 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

“Swap” Scheme

3.10.4 A number of members of the public and some professionals supported the “Swap” Scheme as they considered that it would divert cross-harbour passengers from the crowded Tsuen Wan Line and effectively relieve the congestion of the Island Line. Some suggested that it would attract more passengers from Kowloon East and the New Territories to the Hong Kong Island since passengers from the and Tung Chung Line would be able to reach more destinations along the current Island Line with fewer interchanges. With the enhanced connectivity between the Hong Kong Island and Kowloon East, some professionals and scholars considered that the “Swap” Scheme would stimulate commercial development in Kowloon East.

3.10.5 However, some members of the public, especially the residents in and the Eastern District, opposed to the “Swap” Scheme since it would break the Island Line up and cause inconvenience to residents in the Eastern District, who would have to alter their established travelling habits and interchange to the Tseung Kwan O Line to reach the central and western parts of the Hong Kong Island. As a result, they might choose other road-based public transportation.

3.10.6 The residents were also concerned about the reduction in train frequency in the Eastern District in the “Swap” Scheme. Some professionals and members of the public suggested that, in order to tackle the reduction of train frequency due to the restrictions of , some short-loop services should be introduced on the NIL to maintain an adequate service frequency along busy sections of the line.

3.10.7 Some members of the public expressed concern on the reliability of the NIL under the “Swap” Scheme due to the relatively more technical incidents, service disruptions or delays on the Tung Chung Line and Tseung Kwan O Line. Therefore, they preferred the “Interchange” Scheme, keeping the Island Line unaffected.

Page 26 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

“Interchange” Scheme

3.10.8 Majority of the public, especially the residents in Fortress Hill and the Eastern District, as well as some professionals supported the “Interchange” Scheme, which would maintain the current service of the Island Line and minimise disturbance to residents on the north shore of the Hong Kong Island.

3.10.9 However, some were worried that if the “Interchange” Scheme was adopted, the NIL would be less attractive to passengers since it would not be able to serve the traditional CBDs that are currently served by the Island Line. As a result, the “Interchange” Scheme would not be as effective as the “Swap” Scheme in serving the purpose of diverting passengers and relieving congestion on the Island Line.

Interchange between the NIL and the Existing Lines

3.10.10 Many respondents expressed concern on the interchange arrangement of the NIL and stressed that the need of interchange should be minimised. If interchanges were required, cross-platform interchange arrangement should be allowed as far as possible. Many pointed out that some of the current interchange designs, including those at the - Central Station and the Station, were not convenient and should be avoided.

Page 27 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.11 Siu Sai Wan Line (SSWL)

Fig. 3.6: Preliminary Conceptual Scheme of the SSWL

3.11.1 The following key consultation points were provided in the PE materials to facilitate public participation.

Given the inadequate space for railway development in Siu Sai Wan, would you accept demolishing existing buildings in the Eastern District or conducting reclamation to construct the Siu Sai Wan Line? Why?

In general, under what circumstances would you support the implementation of the Siu Sai Wan Line? Why?

Overview

3.11.2 Many residents in Siu Sai Wan and the Eastern District supported the SSWL and mentioned that they had long been requesting the implementation of the railway line to improve the local public transport services.

Page 28 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.11.3 However, many respondents had reservations about the financial viability of the SSWL since the population of Siu Sai Wan was insufficient to support a cost-effective railway extension, and the existing feeder services were convenient to local residents. They suggested that efforts should be made to relieve the congestion on the road network in Siu Sai Wan, and the SSWL should be developed only when there were plans on further developments in Siu Sai Wan.

3.11.4 Some scholars suggested that cost and benefit analysis of the SSWL and a comprehensive review of the existing feeder services in Siu Sai Wan should be carried out to assess the demand for and viability of the SSWL.

3.11.5 Some residents in were worried that the construction of the SSWL might lead to adverse al impact on the environment of Heng Fa Chuen.

“Extension” Scheme, “Bifurcation” Scheme and “Feeder” Scheme

3.11.6 Many Siu Sai Wan residents supported the SSWL but had no strong preference on the three proposed schemes, namely the “Extension”, “Bifurcation” and “Feeder” Schemes.

3.11.7 Some members of the public and residents in the Eastern District supported the “Extension” Scheme since it would provide direct and convenient railway service to Siu Sai Wan, while not affecting the existing railway service to . However, some professionals and members of the public considered that it was not worthwhile and fair to demolish existing buildings in Chai Wan, which would affect many residents.

Page 29 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.11.8 Some members of the public and residents in the Eastern District supported the “Bifurcation” Scheme and pointed out that reclamation at the Chai Wan Cargo Handling Basin could provide land for future developments in Siu Sai Wan, making the SSWL more viable. Some others, however, suggested that the SSWL should be built underground to minimise such impact. Some also had reservations about reclamation as it might create irreversible and permanent loss of marine habitats. Besides, there were concerns on the reduction of train frequency to Chai Wan under the “Bifurcation” Scheme.

3.11.9 With a view to avoiding the demolition of existing buildings and reclamation which would cause considerable disturbance to the community, some members of the public and residents in the Eastern District preferred the “Feeder” Scheme since it would require less land take. However, some professionals and members of the public pointed out that the “Feeder” Scheme might not be viable and competitive given the limited catchment of the railway station in Siu Sai Wan and the availability of other convenient and flexible road-based feeder services connecting Siu Sai Wan to existing railway stations.

3.11.10 Besides, many members of the public and professionals suggested that other types of feeder services in Siu Sai Wan, such as light rail system, rubber-tyred rail, automated people mover, extending the tram service and enhancing the existing road-based feeder services, could also be considered to enhance the overall feeder services in Siu Sai Wan.

Page 30 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.12 South Island Line (West) (SIL(W))

Aberdeen Section Pokfulam Section

Fig. 3.7: Preliminary Conceptual Schemes of the SIL(W)

3.12.1 The following key consultation points were provided in the PE materials to facilitate public participation.

Do you agree that the Aberdeen Section and Pokfulam Section of the South Island Line (West) may be developed in two phases and that railway service should first be developed from Aberdeen to Wah Fu whereas provision be made for the future extension to Pokfulam? Why?

Should the Pokfulam Section of the South Island Line (West) be implemented, the addition of Queen Mary Hospital Station would have bearing on the alignment design. As a result, the section near could hardly be constructed in tunnel, and might create visual impact along the alignment. Do you think it is worthwhile to include a Queen Mary Hospital Station? Why?

In general, under what circumstances would you support the implementation of the South Island Line (West)? Why?

Page 31 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Overview

3.12.2 There was general support for the implementation of the SIL(W) to relieve the traffic congestion in the road network of Aberdeen and Pokfulam. Majority of the public considered that the SIL(W) would complement the future developments or redevelopment in the Southern District, such as the potential redevelopment of Wah Fu and Tin Wan, and support IT development in Cyberport. Some professionals suggested that extending railway service to areas which were only served by buses and minibuses would help reduce road traffic. Some members of the public, professionals and scholars were concerned that the SIL(W) would have significant social, environmental, ecological and landscape impact and suggested that assessments should be carried out to examine these impact of the SIL(W) when considering this new railway line.

3.12.3 Some taxi and minibus operators objected to the SIL(W) since Aberdeen, Tin Wan and Wah Fu areas were currently well served by public transportation and the railway line would seriously affect the market share of other public transport modes.

3.12.4 Some professionals and scholars suggested that the SIL(W) would be effective only if the interchange arrangement was convenient. They pointed out that many passengers might need to interchange more than once to reach their destinations, for example, residents in Aberdeen would need to interchange twice when going to Central.

Page 32 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Implementation of the Aberdeen Section and the Pokfulam Section

3.12.5 There was general support for the Aberdeen Section. Many members of the public considered that it would complement the future developments and redevelopment in the Southern District, such as the redevelopment of Wah Fu and Tin Wan.

3.12.6 There were reservations from some local residents of Pokfulam, professionals and scholars about the need for the Pokfulam Section because there were no major developments along its alignment and the Pokfulam area was already well served by public transportation. Many suggested that the Pokfulam Section would be supported if the whole alignment was to be built underground so that the visual impact would be minimised. Some members of the public suggested that the Pokfulam Section would provide an alternative route to the urban area in addition to the South Island Line (East) and help relieve the traffic congestion in Pokfulam, benefitting the residents and workers in Pokfulam and Cyberport.

Phasing of the South Island Line (West)

3.12.7 The general public had diverse views on whether the Aberdeen Section and the Pokfulam Section should be built in one phase or two phases.

3.12.8 Many members of the public and residents in the Southern District expressed the view that it would be more cost-effective to build the SIL(W) in one phase. They were worried that if only the Aberdeen Section was built, Station might not be able to handle the increased number of passengers. As a result, people would still use road-based transport modes and the congestion of the Aberdeen Tunnel could not be effectively relieved.

Page 33 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.12.9 In view of the imminent need for railway service from residents in Aberdeen, Tin Wan and Wah Fu and for relieving the heavily congested Aberdeen Tunnel, many members of the public and residents in the Southern District considered that the Aberdeen Section should be given priority and developed first. While there was general consensus on the development of the Aberdeen Section in the local community, there were some reservations from the local community in Pokfulam on the need and design of the Pokfulam Section. Some members of the public and professionals suggested that more detailed information on the estimated cost for construction and maintenance, as well as cost and benefit analysis on implementing the SIL(W) in one phase or two phases should be provided to facilitate public discussion.

Need for Queen Mary Hospital Station

3.12.10 Some members of the public supported the addition of Queen Mary Hospital Station since it would provide convenient railway service to visitors, patients and hospital staff with minor visual impact. However, some others considered that it was not worthwhile to include this station, since there were no major developments near the hospital and the hospital was already well served by other public transportation.

Page 34 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.13 Tuen Mun South Extension (TMS Extension)

Fig. 3.8: Preliminary Conceptual Scheme of the TMS Extension

3.13.1 The following key consultation points were provided in the PE materials to facilitate public participation.

To provide effective railway service in Tuen Mun South, do you consider that the area near is the suitable location for constructing a railway extension? Why?

Upon completion of the Tai Wai to Hung Hom Section of the Shatin to Central Link, the West Rail Line will become a part of the East West Corridor which runs through northwestern New Territories, East Tsim Sha Tsui, Hung Hom, Kowloon East, Tai Wai, and Wu Kai Sha. To avoid congestion from arising along the East West Corridor, do you agree that the way forward for the Tuen Mun South Extension should be decided after the actual usage of the East West Corridor becomes observable? Why?

Page 35 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

In general, under what circumstances would you support the implementation of the Tuen Mun South Extension? Why?

Overview

3.13.2 The general public, especially Tuen Mun residents, supported the TMS Extension since it would improve the public transport connectivity and reduce travel time. They urged that the TMS Extension should be implemented as soon as possible since there was an imminent demand from the local community for the railway extension.

3.13.3 Some members of the public considered that the TMS Extension would not only improve the public transport services from Tuen Mun South to the urban area, but also enhance the connectivity between Yuen Long and Tuen Mun Districts by relieving the congestion in the Light Rail network, benefitting the local economy in Tuen Mun.

3.13.4 Some professionals were worried that the TMS Extension would only serve the peak hour demand and therefore cost and benefit analysis should be carried out to determine whether it should be built. Some scholars suggested that since the Light Rail was serving Tuen Mun South, implementing the TMS Extension would lead to duplication of transport services and misallocation of resources.

3.13.5 Some respondents expressed concern on the patronage of the TMS Extension as Tuen Mun South was well served by public transportation, which could provide more direct and point-to-point services. They suggested that the TMS Extension should further extend to the Hong Kong International Airport or the Tung Chung Line to increase patronage. Some professionals and scholars were worried that the TMS Extension might affect the sustainability of other public transportation currently serving Tuen Mun South and urged the Government to assess the impact on other public transport modes.

Page 36 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.13.6 Some professionals suggested that the fares of the West Rail were relatively high and, with the inclusion of the new extension, they should be made more affordable in future in order to encourage more patronage and enhance its competitiveness.

Location of Stations of the TMS Extension

3.13.7 Many members of the public, residents in Tuen Mun and professionals suggested that, since there was undeveloped land in areas near Tuen Mun Ferry Pier, Butterfly Estate and Wu King Estate, it was suitable to extend the West Rail along Tuen Mun River Channel and develop a station near Tuen Mun Ferry Pier. The location of the station for the TMS Extension should be close to residential developments and Light Rail stations. However, some local residents were worried that the TMS Extension would cause visual impact along Tuen Mun River Channel.

3.13.8 Some members of the public suggested that another station near the Tuen Mun Swimming Pool should be developed to serve the new residential developments in the surrounding areas.

Page 37 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.14 Hung Shui Kiu Station (HSK Station)

Fig. 3.9: Preliminary Conceptual Scheme of the HSK Station

3.14.1 The following key consultation points were provided in the PE materials to facilitate public participation.

Do you agree that the Government should plan the Hung Shui Kiu Station in tandem with the HSK NDA to satisfy the local transport demand?

Upon completion of the Tai Wai to Hung Hom Section of the Shatin to Central Link, the West Rail Line will become a part of the East West Corridor which runs through northwestern New Territories, East Tsim Sha Tsui, Hung Hom, Kowloon East, Tai Wai, Ma On Shan and Wu Kai Sha. To avoid congestion from arising along the East West Corridor, do you agree that the way forward for the Hung Shui Kiu Station should be decided after the actual usage of the East West Corridor becomes observable? Why?

In general, under what circumstances would you support the implementation of the Hung Shui Kiu Station? Why?

Page 38 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Overview

3.14.2 The general public and many professionals agreed that the HSK Station should be implemented in tandem with the HSK NDA to integrate land use planning and transport planning. Many suggested that the start of operation of the HSK Station should tie in with the population intake of the HSK NDA.

3.14.3 Many professionals and members of the public agreed that if the population of the HSK NDA was around 60,000 to 100,000 or above, then the HSK Station would be needed to serve the local transport demand since the road network and the Light Rail system would be insufficient to meet the traffic needs of the residents. They also considered that the addition of the HSK Station on the existing West Rail would not significantly affect the patronage of the West Rail.

3.14.4 However, some members of the public were worried that the population in the HSK NDA might not be able to support the station and the marginal benefit of providing the station would not be able to justify the capital cost. Some expressed concern that development of the HSK Station and the HSK NDA would lead to the loss of farmland and ecological impact.

Interfacing with Other Railway Lines and Transportation System

3.14.5 Members of the public suggested that the HSK Station should be well connected to the existing Light Rail system to provide convenient railway service to serve the future HSK NDA.

3.14.6 Some professionals recommended that the relationship between the HSK Station and the WEL should be studied since the WEL would affect the ridership patterns at Hung Shui Kiu.

Page 39 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

3.15 Tung Chung West Extension (TCW Extension)

Fig. 3.10: Preliminary Conceptual Scheme of the TCW Extension

3.15.1 The following key consultation points were provided in the PE materials to facilitate public participation.

Apart from the vicinities of , low-density development sprawls across most parts of Tung Chung West. Do you think that the Tung Chung West Extension should tie in with the new town extension plan to improve the cost-effectiveness of the railway project? Why?

A large number of bus routes are available in Tung Chung West, which provide feeder service to of the Tung Chun Line, and travel to and from Tsuen Wan, Ho Man Tin, Tsim Sha Tsui, Hung Hom, Tin Hau, Tseung Kwan O, Tin Shui Wai and Shatin etc. Do you think there is an imminent need to construct the Tung Chung West Extension if Tung Chung West is not further developed? Why?

In general, under what circumstances would you support the implementation of the Tung Chung West Extension? Why?

Page 40 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Overview

3.15.2 Majority of the public agreed that the TCW Extension should tie in with the new town extension plans to provide convenient traffic connection for future residents and facilitate new town developments. They also pointed out that integrating the planning for new town extension and that for the TCW Extension would make the railway project more cost-effective.

3.15.3 However, some considered that the TCW Extension would not be required since the new station would be too close to the existing Tung Chung Station, and the marginal benefit of the extension would not be able to justify the capital cost. They suggested that enhancing the feeder services, such as introducing community light rail system within Tung Chung or free shuttle services to the Tung Chung Line, should be sufficient to improve the connectivity in Tung Chung West.

3.15.4 Many members of the public and professionals agreed that the TCW Extension would be beneficial to the existing community in Yat Tung Estate by providing a more direct railway connection in lieu of the expensive and inconvenient existing feeder services between Yat Tung Estate and Tung Chung Station. However, if Tung Chung West was not to be further developed, then the TCW Extension should not be constructed since the population in Yat Tung Estate would not be sufficient to support the railway service.

3.15.5 Some members of the public suggested that the future Tung Chung Line with the TCW Extension should be more affordable with convenient feeder services, in order to encourage more patronage and enhance its attractiveness and competitiveness.

Page 41 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Environmental Considerations

3.15.6 Some green groups and members of the public were worried that the TCW Extension would involve reclamation in Tung Chung West and affect the ecologically important Tung Chung River and Tung Chung Bay.

3.15.7 Some professionals suggested that the environmental impact of air pollution generated by other road-based feeder services should be taken into consideration. If the TCW Extension was not implemented, other types of electric feeder services should be considered.

3.16 Kwu Tung Station (KTU Station)

Fig. 3.11: Preliminary Conceptual Scheme of the KTU Station

3.16.1 The following key consultation points were provided in the PE materials to facilitate public participation.

Page 42 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Do you agree that the Government should plan the Kwu Tung Station in tandem with the KTN NDA to satisfy the local transport demand?

Adding an intermediate station along an existing railway line may increase the overall journey time. In your opinion, what conditions should be considered when new intermediate stations are added? Why?

In general, under what circumstances would you support the implementation of the Kwu Tung Station? Why?

Overview

3.16.2 Majority of the public supported the implementation of the KTU Station and agreed that if the Kwu Tung North New Development Area (KTN NDA) was to be developed, then the KTU Station should be built to meet the local transport demand in time. They considered that the cost of implementing the KTU Station should not be a problem since provisions of the station were made during the construction of the . Many suggested that the KTU Station should be connected to the NOL to improve the east-west connectivity of the New Territories.

3.16.3 However, some local residents in Kwu Tung strongly objected to the development of the KTN NDA and suggested that the KTU Station would not be required since the existing public transportation in Kwu Tung was sufficient to meet the current transport needs of local residents. They were also concerned about the impact on farmlands, fish ponds and building structures during the construction of the station.

Page 43 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Concern on the Capacity of the East Rail

3.16.4 Many member of the public respondedġthat the East Rail Line was already very full in the morning peak hours. They were concerned that the East Rail Line could not accommodate the additional passengers from the KTU Station. They were worried that, if the KTU Station was added and the capacity of the East Rail Line was decreased due to the operation of the Shatin to Central Link, passengers might not be able to get on the train at and Fanling Stations to travel to the urban area since the East Rail Line would already be fully occupied by the passengers boarding at the KTU Station.

3.16.5 They considered that the KTU Station would increase the patronage of the Lok Ma Chau Spur Line when the KTN NDA was implemented, and therefore measures should be taken to ensure that the East Rail Line would be able to cope with the transport needs of the North District.

Page 44 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

4. CONCLUSION AND WAY FORWARD

4.1.1 With reference to the public views collected at both stages of the PE exercise, we conducted further assessment on the railway proposals put forth for public discussion, such that the planning of the major regional corridors and local enhancement schemes could be optimised in a coordinated manner.

4.1.2 Suggestions on other railway proposals were also received from the public during two stages of the PE exercise and are summarised in Appendix III. Subsequent to the collection of the public views, we conducted further study on some of these railway proposals and attempted to integrate them into the existing railway network (with adjustments, additions and deletions where necessary), with a view to providing our overall recommendations to the Government in formulating the railway development blueprint for Hong Kong.

Page 45 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Appendix I: Dissemination of Information about the PE Exercise

The following sections summarise the means of dissemination of information and collection of public views during the PE period.

PE Publication

PE Documents and PE Digests (in both Chinese and English) were released to the public for them to gain a better understanding of the study background, preliminary study findings, and conceptual schemes of the ten proposals. The documents were available at public enquiry service centres of 18 District Offices of the Home Affairs Department and public libraries throughout Hong Kong and were also downloadable from the study website.

Study Website

The study website (www.ourfuturerailway.hk) was officially launched on 20 April 2012. Apart from general background information of the study, descriptions and illustrations of the conceptual schemes, the website also featured “Key Consultation Points” of various topics to enhance the public’s understanding and to gather their views. The public might submit their views, comments and suggestions on the schemes.

Upon the completion of the Stage 2 PE exercise on 20 May 2013, the website recorded over 303,000 visits; over 1,200 and 2,950 comments were received on the website during Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the PE exercise respectively. Although the Stage 2 PE exercise officially ended on 20 May 2013, the study website remained available until the completion of the study.

Page 46 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Online Forums

Official government online forums (“Public Affairs Forum” www.forum.gov.hk) on the topics “Our Future Railway Stage 1 Public Engagement Exercise” and “Our Future Railway Stage 2 Public Engagement Exercise” were set up to facilitate public discussion on the internet. A total of 39 comments were received through this channel.

Apart from the “Public Affairs Forum”, it was noted that the public also discussed "Our Future Railway" on other online forums and discussion groups.

Emails, Hotline, Faxes and Written Submissions

To encourage public participation, a hotline (3922 9777) was set up for registration for the PE activities and general enquiries. The public could submit their comments via email ([email protected]), fax (3922 9713) and by post to the Railway Development Office of the . The Government also received comments from the public via general enquiry channels and Integrated Call Centre (ICC).

Publicity

Different publicity initiatives were used to augment the reach and visibility of the PE exercise. These include posters; newspaper advertisements; TV and radio Announcements in the Public Interest (APIs); and a series of roving exhibitions.

Posters

Posters were put up on notice boards at public libraries and public enquiry service centres with a view to facilitating the participation of the PE exercise and publicity of the study.

Page 47 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Newspaper Advertisements

Newspaper advertisements in Chinese and English were placed to publicise the PE activities, and to call for participation. Advertisements were placed on a few local newspapers on 25 April 2012 and 25 February 2013 for Stage 1 PE and Stage 2 of the PE exercise respectively.

TV/Radio APIs

The APIs were broadcast on the radio and television from 7 and 9 May 2012 respectively until 20 July 2012 during the Stage 1 PE period; and from 22 February 2013 until 19 May 2013 during the Stage 2 PE period.

Page 48 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Roving Exhibitions

To increase public awareness of the PE exercise, a series of roving exhibitions were set up at over 20 different locations, covering both the urban and the New Territories areas.

Roving exhibitions for Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the PE exercise were held from 26 April to 22 June 2012 and from 22 February to 20 May 2013 respectively.

Stage 1 PE Date Venue 26 - 28 April 2012 Exhibition Corner, FJ Podium, The Hong Kong Polytechnic 2 - 5 May 2012 University 9 - 12 May 2012 , Wan Chai 16 - 19 May 2012 Subway of East Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station 21 - 23 May 2012 Tsuen Wan Government Offices Covered Piazza, G/F, , 24 - 27 May 2012 Causeway Bay 30 May - 1, 4 June Mongkok Government Offices 2012 11 - 14 June 2012 North District Government Offices 19 - 22 June 2012 Government Offices Stage 2 PE Date Venue Covered Piazza, G/F, Times Square, 22 - 24 Feb 2013 Causeway Bay 25 Feb - 1 March 2013 Tuen Mun Government Offices 4 - 8 March 2013 North District Government Offices 11 - 15 March 2013 Wan Government Offices 18 - 22 March 2013 Queensway Government Offices 25 March - 2 April Government Offices 2013 4 - 10 April 2013 Subway of East Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station 12 - 18 April 2013 Tung Chung Municipal Services Building 24 - 30 April 2013 Immigration Tower, Wan Chai 6 - 10 May 2013 Ho Man Tin Government Offices 13 - 20 May 2013 Sha Tin Government Offices

Page 49 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Appendix II: Public Engagement Activities

To facilitate public engagement and enhance interaction, a range of PE activities were organised during the PE period. They included:

Public Forums

The Public Forums aimed at providing a platform for the Government, the consultant and the general public to gather and discuss in a comprehensive and interactive manner. Four Public Forums were conducted during each stage of the PE exercise, covering both the urban and New Territories areas.

Public Forums during Stage 1 PE Date Venue 5 May 2012 Lecture Room 2, Tuen Mun Town Hall Function Room AC2, Hong Kong Cultural 21 May 2012 Centre, Tsim Sha Tsui Room 502, The Boys & Girls Clubs Association 2 June 2012 of HK, Wan Chai 19 June 2012 Function Room 2, Tai Po Civic Centre Public Forums during Stage 2 PE Date Venue 16 March 2013 Multi-Purpose Hall, City Gallery, Central Function Room AC2, Hong Kong Cultural 19 March 2013 Centre, Tsim Sha Tsui 20 April 2013 Lecture Room 2, Tuen Mun Town Hall 23 April 2013 Auditorium, North District Town Hall

The forums were moderated by an independent media professional and conducted in . Each forum started with an introduction on the study background and preliminary study findings, followed by a presentation on the conceptual schemes proposed in each stage of the PE exercise. The forum then went into open floor discussion with responses from Government representatives.

Page 50 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Participants at the forums included the general public, students, District Councillors, professionals, residents from different local communities and other stakeholders. The eight Public Forums were attended by over 490 participants in total.

Focus Group Meetings

To facilitate in-depth discussion with professionals and academics, two Focus Group Meetings were conducted during each stage of the PE exercise. They were conducted on 12 May 2012 and 23 May 2012 during the Stage 1 PE exercise and on 6 March 2013 and 23 March 2013 during the Stage 2 PE exercise. Participation was by invitation. A total of 32 and 25 experts with relevant professional and academic background participated in the Focus Group Meetings held during Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the PE exercise respectively.

Briefings to Statutory and Advisory Bodies/Committees

Briefing sessions were conducted with various statutory and advisory bodies/committees during the two stages of PE exercise. These included:

Page 51 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Stage 1 PE Stage 2 PE Subcommittee on Matters Relating to Railways, Legislative Council (LegCo) Transport Advisory Committee Heung Yee Kuk District Councils (DCs) (upon their invitations) - Tsuen Wan (Traffic & Transport - Southern Committee) - Islands (Traffic & Transport - Southern Committee) - Tuen Mun (Traffic & Transport - Kwun Tong (Traffic & Transport Committee) Committee) - Yau Tsim Mong (Traffic & - Eastern (Traffic & Transport Transport Committee) Committee) - Islands (Traffic & Transport - Sham Shui Po (Transport Affairs Committee) Committee) - Eastern (Traffic & Transport - Central and Western (Traffic & Committee) Transport Committee) - North - Yuen Long - Yuen Long - Tsuen Wan (Traffic & Transport Committee) - Tai Po (Traffic & Transport Committee - Tuen Mun (Traffic & Transport Committee) - North (Traffic & Transport Committee) - Wan Chai

Briefings to Professional Institutes and Business Sector

Briefing sessions were also conducted with the following bodies from the professional and business sectors upon their invitations:

Invitations received during the Stage 1 PE exercise:

ƒ Chartered Institute of Logistics and (CILTHK)

ƒ Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce (HKGCC)

ƒ Business and Professionals Federation of Hong Kong (BPFHK)

Page 52 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Invitations received during the Stage 2 PE exercise:

ƒ Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport in Hong Kong (CILTHK)

ƒ Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce (HKGCC)

ƒ Hong Kong Institute of Planners (HKIP), Hong Kong Institute of Urban Design (HKIUD), Hong Kong Institute of Architects (HKIA) (Joint invitation)

ƒ Architectural, surveying and planning professionals (organised by the Hon. Tony TSE, Legislative Council Member of Architectural, Surveying and Planning Functional Constituency)

Briefings to Political Parties on invitation

Briefing sessions were also conducted with the following bodies from the political parties upon their invitations during the Stage 2 PE exercise:

Invitations received during the PE exercise:

ƒ Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB)

ƒ Newġ PeopleȽs Party (NPP)

ƒ Democratic Party

ƒ Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions (HKFTU)

Page 53 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Appendix III Other Suggestions from the Public on the Ten Proposed Railway Schemes during Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the Public Engagement Exercise Extension of the WEL 1. Extension of the Domestic Spur Line to different areas, e.g. , Sunny Bay and 2. Provision of the Domestic Spur Line by extending the West Rail Line from Yuen Long to Ching Chung via Tuen Mun

(WEL) 3. Extension of the Cross-boundary Spur Line to Tin Shui Wai Other Suggestion 4. Tin Shui Wai as the interchanging hub for the Cross-boundary Spur Hong Kong-Shenzhen Western Express Line Western Express Line Extension of the NOL 1. Extension to the NENT, e.g. Liantang, Kwan Tei and Sha Tau Kok 2. Extension to Chau Tau, Lok Ma Chau and Lo Wu 3. Extension to Tuen Mun and Tung Chung 4. Extension to Tai Po Industrial Estate and Science Park via Lau Shui Heung, and further connection to the Shatin to Central Link

(NOL) 5. Extension from Kam Sheung Road to Tai Wai

Northern Link Northern 6. Connection to Yuen Long Station and further extension to Long Ping and Tin Shui Wai Other Suggestion 7. Provision of stations at Palm Springs and Fairview Park

Extension to the TMTWL 1. Extension to Tin King Estate, Tuen Mun Town Centre, Hung Shui Kiu and Yuen Long Other Suggestion 2. Alternative alignment of the TMTWL via 3. Provision of stations at various locations, e.g. Gold Coast, Tai Lam and Siu Lam. Wan Link (TMTWL) Tuen Mun to Tsuen 4. Provision of a spur line of the TMTWL to Tsing Yi

Page 54 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Extension of the NIL 1. Extension of the Tseung Kwan O Line in the “Interchange” Scheme to the southwest areas, e.g. Hong Kong Station, Central South and Pokfulam area with connection to the SIL(W). 2. Extension of the Tung Chung Line in the “Interchange” Scheme to Wan Chai South, Leighton and Happy Valley Other Suggestion 3. Provision of a station near Fortress Hill on the Tseung Kwan O Line between North Point and Tin Hau in the “Swap” Scheme 4. Extension of the Tung Chung Line parallel to the Island Line, with fewer stops for provision of “express rail” service

North Island Line (NIL) Island Line (NIL) North 5. Expansion of the current Island Line by running parallel lines, i.e. two tracks in each direction 6. Extension of the Airport Express Line and connection to the NIL 7. Deletion of the Tamar Station Extension of the SSWL 1. Extension of the SSWL to various locations, such as , Ngan Wan, Tseung Kwan O, Tung Lung Chau and / Stanley 2. Extension of the Island Line to Siu Sai Wan and then to the Tsueng Kwan O Line via LOHAS Park to form a loop. Other Suggestion 3. Bifurcation of the SSWL from instead of Heng Fa

Siu Sai Wan Line (SSWL) Wan Line (SSWL) Siu Sai Tsuen

Page 55 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Extension of the SIL(W) 1. Extension of the SIL(W) by linking with the proposed artificial island near , and further extension to Cheung Chau and Lantau Island 2. Connection of the SIL(W) to the unused platform at Rumsey Street in , and further extension to Kai Tak and Kowloon East Other Suggestion 3. Shifting the alignment from Cyberport toward the Chi Fu area 4. Connection of the SIL(W) to Station instead of Hong Kong University Station 5. Direct connection from Cyberport to Central 6. Extension of the South Island Line (East) and the Shatin to Central Link to Aberdeen and Pokfulam areas. South Island Line (West) (SIL(W)) (West) Island South Line 7. Running the alignment of the SIL (W) by tram service to form a loop along the south shore of the Hong Kong Island Extension from Tuen Mun South

1. Extension from Tuen Mun South to the west to River Trade Terminal or , and Nim Wan 2. Extension from Tuen Mun South to the south to the Airport or Tung Chung Other Suggestion

Tuen Mun South Tuen Mun South Extension (TMS) 3. Provision of a station near Tuen Mun Swimming Pool 4. Integration of the TMS Extension with the WEL 1. Provision of a spur line to connect the HSK Station with the WEL.

(HSK) (HSK) Hung Shui Kiu Station 1. Provision of a community railway, light rail or monorail to connect Tung Chung West, Tung Chung and the Airport.

2. Provision of stations at Tung Chung East and Siu Ho Wan (TCW)

Tung Chung

West Extension West Extension

Page 56 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

1 Connection from the KTU Station to the 2 Provision of two stations to serve the Kwu Tung North NDA.

(KTU) (KTU) Kwu Tung Station

Page 57 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Other Suggestions from the Public on New Railway Proposals during Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the Public Engagement Exercise Provision of railway service to NT North 1. Extension of the Shatin to Central Link to Fanling South, Ping Che, Ta Kwu Ling and Liantang 2. Extension of the West Rail Line to Tin Shui Wai North Provision of railway service to NT East 3. Extension of the Tseung Kwan O Line from Po Lam to Wu Kai Sha and Fo Tan via HKUST and Sai Kung 4. Extension of the Tseung Kwan O Line to Tsui Lam and Ma 5. Extension of the from Wu Kai Sha to Tai Po via Ma Shi Chau 6. Provision of a station at Kam Ying on the Ma On Shan Line 7. Extension of the East Rail Line to Ma Liu Shui and Science Park 8. Provision of a new station at , and between Tai Wo and Fanling on the East Rail Line Provision of railway service to NT West 9. Provision of a railway between Tsuen Wan, Tsuen Wan West and Tsing Yi 10. Extension of the Tsuen Wan Line to Discovery Park, , and Hanley Villa 11. Extension of the West Rail Line from Tsuen Wan West to the industrial areas along Texaco Road 12. Extension or realignment of the West Rail Line to serve Hung Shui Kiu, Butterfly Beach, Tin King, Leung King, Shan King, and Area 46 / Area 40 of Tuen Mun

Other Suggestions on NT Lines from the Public NT Lines from the on Other Suggestions 13. Extension of the West Rail Line to Sham Tseng 14. Provision of a railway between Shek Yum (Kwai Chung) and Lai King Connection between NT East and NT West 15. Provision of a railway between Tsuen Wan West and Tai Wai via Lai King, NE Kwai Chung and Lei Muk Shue 16. Provision of a railway between Tsuen Wan or Yuen Long and Tai Po Connection between NT East and West Kowloon 17. Provision of a railway between Mei Foo or West Kowloon and Shatin Provision of railway service to Lantau Island

Page 58 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

18. Extension of the Tung Chung Line to the Airport, AsiaWorld-Expo and Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities (HKBCF) 19. Provision of stations at Siu Ho Wan and HKBCF on the Airport Express Line Provision of railway service to Outlying Islands 20. Provision of a railway between Sunny Bay and Kennedy Town via , Cheung Chau and Lamma Island 21. Extension of the Shatin to Central Link or the South Island Line (East) to Lamma Island 22. Extension of the to 23. Extension of the West Island Line to Ma Wan via Peng Chau, Discovery Bay and Disneyland Connection between NT West and other areas 24. Extension of the Airport Express Line to Tuen Mun 25. Provision of a railway between Tuen Mun Ferry Pier to Sheung Wan via Tai Lam, Siu Lam, Disneyland Resort, Cheung Chau and Lamma Island 26. Extension of the West Rail Line to / Provision of cross-boundary railway service 27. Provision of a railway between Shenzhen Bay and Tin Shui Wai 28. Provision of a railway between Stanley and Man Kam To 29. Provision of a railway between Lok Ma Chau and Shenzhen Futian station of the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link (XRL) 30. Provision of a station in New Territories for the XRL 31. Provision of Intercity Through Trains services by the XRL track or connection of the XRL to Lo Wu Other Suggestions 32. Provision of express railway service along the East Rail Line or connecting districts with a population of over 500,000 33. Provision of the Port Rail Line by making use of the NOL and the East West Corridor

Page 59 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

34. Provision of Light Rail systems at/between: - NENT NDAs - Hung Shui Kiu NDA - Tung Chung New Town - Sheung Shui – Fanling – Tai Po - Tai Wai – Shatin – Fo Tan – Ma On Shan - Tsueng Kwan O – – Kwun Tong Connection within West / Central Kowloon 1. Provision of a railway between East Tsim Sha Tsui and Lai Chi Kok via Cultural Centre, Austin Station, Prosperous Garden, Hoi Fu Court, Lai On Estate and Hoi Lai Estate or via Centenary Garden, Pui Ching Road, Parc Oasis, Shek Kip Mei, Pak Tin Estate, Chak On Estate, Lei Cheng Uk and Caritas Medical Centre 2. Provision of a railway between Mong Kok East and Olympic via 3. Provision of a railway between Jordan and West Kowloon Cultural District via Austin Station and Kowloon Station 4. Provision of a railway between West Kowloon Terminus and via Hong Kong Culture Centre, Hong Kong Space Museum and Hong Kong Science Museum 5. Extension of the East Rail Line to East Connection within East Kowloon 6. Provision of a railway between Yau Tong Industrial Area and Lok Fu via Tak Tin, , , Anderson Road, Shun Tin, , Choi Wan, Hammer Hill, Tsz Wan Shan, Chuk Yuen and Kowloon Tong 7. Provision of a railway between Yau Tong and To Kwa Wan via Kowloon City, Lok Fu, Tsz Wan Shan, Choi Wan, Shun Lee, and Sau Mau Ping 8. Extension of the Tseung Kwan O Line to serve Sau Mau Ping, Shun Lee, Kai Cheung Road and connection to of the Shatin to Central Link

Other Suggestions on Urban Lines from the Public Urban Lines from on the Other Suggestions 9. Provision of a railway between Diamond Hill and Kwun Tong via Choi Hung, Choi Wan, Shun Lee, Sau Mau Ping, Po Tat, Tak Tin and Lam Tin 10. Provision of a railway between Lam Tin and Tin Ma Court via Sau Mau Ping, Anderson Road, Shun Lee, Choi Wan, Hammer Hill, Tsz Wan Shan and Chuk Yuen 11. Extension of the from Tiu Keng Leng to Hang Hau and Po Lam

Page 60 September 2014

Review and Update of the Railway Strategy 2000 Public Engagement Report

Connection between East and West Kowloon 12. Provision of a railway between Olympic and Kwun Tong via Mong Kok, Kowloon City, Kai Tak and 13. Provision of a railway between Yau Ma Tei and Sam Ka Tsuen via PolyU, Whampoa, Laguna Verde, Kai Tak and or Richland Gardens, Estate, , Lok Wah Estate, Hong Ning Road, Yuet Wah Street, Road, Kai Tin Road, Ping Tin Estate, Kwong Tin Estate, Ko Cheung Court and Lei Yue Mun Village 14. Provision of a railway between Tsz Wan Shan and Lai King 15. Provision of a railway between Nam Cheong and Anderson Road via Olympic, Mong Kok and Kowloon City Provision of railway service on the Hong Kong Island 16. Provision of an alternative interchange station of the South Island Line (East) at Causeway Bay or Tin Hau 17. Provision of on the South Island Line (East) 18. Extension of the Island Line from Chai Wan to Bay Provision of harbour-crossing railway service 19. Provision of a railway between Olympic and Sheung Wan via Mong Kok East, Sung Wong Toi, Ma Tau Kok, Kowloon Bay South, Cruise Terminal, Lam Tin, Tai Koo, Tin Hau, Victoria Park, Exhibition, Tamar and Hong Kong Station 20. Extension of the Kwun Tong Line from Lam Tin to , Quarry Bay, North Point, Fortress Hill, Causeway Bay North, Exhibition, Tamar and Hong Kong Station 21. Extension of the Kwun Tong Line from Whampoa to Fortress Hill 22. Extension of the Kwun Tong Line from Yau Ma Tei to Hung Hom and North Point to form a loop 23. Extension of the XRL from West Kowloon Terminus to Central and Tamar 24. Extension of the Shatin to Central Link to Central South or Tamar

Page 61 September 2014