Biological Resources Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biological Resources Report Initial Study/Environmental Checklist City of Oceanside, California APPENDIX E – BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES REPORT Indian Grove Development Project MND – P16-00006 and D16-0018 February 2018 nVision Development, Inc. Residences at Indian Grove Project Biological Resources Technical Report December 2016 Biological Resources Technical Report: RESIDENCES AT INDIAN GROVE PROJECT CITY OF OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: nVision Development, Inc. 1401 N. El Camino Real, Suite 207 San Clemente, CA 92672 Contact: Daniel Clark (949)278-7379 Prepared by: Rincon Consultants, Inc. 2215 Faraday Avenue, Suite A Carlsbad, California 92008 760-918-9444 December 2016 Indian Grove Project Biological Resources Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. i 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Location and Description ............................................................................................. 1 2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Regulatory Overview ................................................................................................................ 3 2.1.1 Environmental Statutes ..................................................................................................... 3 2.1.2 Guidelines for Determining CEQA Significance ........................................................... 3 2.2 Literature Review ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Field Reconnaissance Survey ................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Focused Surveys ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.4.1 Jurisdictional Delineation ................................................................................................. 5 3.0 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 7 3.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 7 3.1.1 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.2 Watershed and Drainages ................................................................................................. 9 3.1.3 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 General Wildlife ....................................................................................................................... 11 4.0 Sensitive Biological Resources.................................................................................................... 12 4.1 Special-Status Species .............................................................................................................. 12 4.1.1 Special-Status Plant Species ............................................................................................ 19 4.1.2 Special-Status Wildlife Species ....................................................................................... 19 4.2 Sensitive Plant Communities.................................................................................................. 20 4.3 Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands ...................................................................................... 20 4.3.1 USACE and San Diego RWQCB Jurisdiction ................................................................... 20 4.3.2 CDFW Jurisdiction ............................................................................................................... 20 4.4 Wildlife Movement .................................................................................................................. 20 4.5 Resources Protected By Local Policies and Ordinances ..................................................... 21 5.0 Impact Analysis and Mitigation Measures ............................................................................... 22 5.1 Special-Status Species .............................................................................................................. 22 5.2 Sensitive Plant Communities.................................................................................................. 24 5.3 Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands ...................................................................................... 25 5.4 Wildlife Movement .................................................................................................................. 26 nVision Development, Inc. i Indian Grove Project Biological Resources Technical Report 5.5 Local Policies and Ordinances ............................................................................................... 26 5.6 Adopted or Approved Plans .................................................................................................. 27 5.7 Cumulative Impact Analysis .................................................................................................. 27 6.0 Limitations, Assumptions, and Use Reliance........................................................................... 28 7.0 References ..................................................................................................................................... 29 8.0 List of Preparers ........................................................................................................................... 31 Tables Table 1. Special-Status Species with Potential to Occur in Project Area Figures Figure 1. Regional Location Figure 2. USDA Soils Map Figure 3. Biological Resources Figure 4. CNDDB 2 Mile Occurrence Figure 5. Impacts Appendix Appendix A Site Photographs Appendix B Observed Species Compendium Appendix C Tentative Parcel Map dated January 16, 2016 nVision Development, Inc. ii Indian Grove Project Biological Resources Technical Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report documents the findings of a Biological Resources Assessment (BRA) conducted by Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) for the Indian Grove Development Project, located in the City of Oceanside (City), California. The purpose of this report is to document the existing conditions of the survey area and to evaluate the potential for impacts to special-status biological resources for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review process. 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The project site is located within the Morro Hills neighborhood of the City of Oceanside. Specifically, the site is situated just northeast of the intersection of Sleeping Indian Road and Grove View Road. The site is flanked by Grove View Road and agricultural fields to the east, private properties to the west and south of the site, and more agricultural fields and private property to the north. The survey area is depicted in Township 10 South, Range 4 West, and Section 26 of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Morro Hill, California 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle (Figure 1). The project area lies within an Agricultural Exclusion Zone as reflected in the North County Multiple Habitat Conservation Program, Oceanside Subarea Plan (City of Oceanside 2010). The proposed project will include the grading and development of a three separate residential lots on approximate 8 acre property split from a larger parcel (APN 122-310-11). The homes will range from 3,630 to 4,775 square feet on approximately 2.5 acres of land each. Two of the homes will be single story and one house will be two-stories, each with three car garages and other extensive outdoor amenities. The project will also involve the establishment of a 10-foot wide rock lined channel along an existing drainage for flood control purposes. Project descriptions in this report are based on the City of Oceanside Tentative Parcel Map dated January 16, 2016. The proposed project is located within the Oceanside Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (hereafter, SAP and/or Plan). This Plan is a Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) and a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) pursuant to Section 10(a) of the ESA (as amended) and is discussed in greater detail in Section 4.5. nVision Development, Inc. 1 Indian Grove Project Biological Resources Technical Report ^_ P A C I F I C O C E A N 0 2.5 5 Miles Imagery provided by ESRI and its licensors © 2016. ± ^_ Project Location Basemap Source: ESRI Data, 2004, and USGS/CDFG, 2002. ^_ Regional Location Figure 1 nVision Development, Inc. Indian Grove Project Biological Resources Technical Report 2.0 METHODOLOGY 2.1 REGULATORY OVERVIEW Regulated or sensitive resources studied and analyzed herein include special-status plant and wildlife species, nesting birds and raptors, sensitive plant communities, jurisdictional waters and wetlands, wildlife movement, and locally protected resources, such as protected trees. 2.1.1 Environmental Statutes For the purpose of this report, potential impacts to biological resources were analyzed based on the following statutes: California Environmental
Recommended publications
  • Thread-Leaved Brodiaea); Proposed Rule
    Tuesday, December 8, 2009 Part IV Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Revised Critical Habitat for Brodiaea Filifolia (Thread-Leaved Brodiaea); Proposed Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:06 Dec 07, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\08DEP3.SGM 08DEP3 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS3 64930 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 234 / Tuesday, December 8, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Federal Information Relay Service excluding areas that exhibit these (FIRS) at (800) 877–8339. impacts. Fish and Wildlife Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (7) Whether lands in any specific subunits being proposed as critical 50 CFR Part 17 Public Comments habitat should be considered for [FWS–R8–ES–2009–0073] We intend that any final action exclusion under section 4(b)(2) of the [92210–1117–0000–B4] resulting from this proposed rule will be Act by the Secretary, and whether the based on the best scientific and benefits of potentially excluding any RIN 1018–AW54 commercial data available and be as particular area outweigh the benefits of accurate and as effective as possible. including that area as critical habitat. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Therefore, we request comments or and Plants; Proposed Revised Critical (8) The Secretary’s consideration to information from the public, other Habitat for Brodiaea filifolia (thread- exercise his discretion under section concerned government agencies, the leaved brodiaea) 4(b)(2) of the Act to exclude lands scientific community, industry, or other proposed in Subunits 11a, 11b, 11c, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, interested party concerning this 11d, 11e, 11f, 11g, and 11h that are Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Rare Plant Survey Repo
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Biological Monitoring Program Rare Plant Survey Report 2008 15 April 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................1 SURVEY GOALS: ...........................................................................................................................1 METHODS .......................................................................................................................................2 PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT............................................................................................................2 PERSONNEL AND TRAINING...........................................................................................................2 SURVEY SITE SELECTION ..............................................................................................................3 SURVEY METHODS........................................................................................................................7 DATA ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................................................9 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................11 ALLIUM MARVINII, YUCAIPA ONION..............................................................................................13 ALLIUM MUNZII, MUNZ’S ONION
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX C Biological Sensitive Species List
    APPENDIX C Biological Sensitive Species List Appendix C Biological Sensitive Species Lists Table C-1 Special Status Plant Species Reported or Potentially Occurring within the General Plan Update Boundary Federal State CNPS Common Name Scientific Name Status(1) Status(2) List(3) MHCP Status Habitat Associations Angiosperms - Monocotyledons Orcutt's Brodiaea 1B.1 Vernal pools, valley and foothill brodiaea orcuttii grassland, closed-cone coniferous forest, cismontane woodland, chaparral, meadows. San Diego Muilla 1B.1 Narrow endemic Chaparral, coastal scrub, valley and goldenstar clevelandii foothill grassland, vernal pools. thread-leaved Brodiaea filifolia FT SE 1B.1 Narrow endemic Cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, brodiaea playas, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools. Angiosperms - Dicotyledons beach Heterotheca 1B.1 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub, goldenaster sessiliflora ssp. chaparral (coastal). sessiliflora California Adolphia 2.1 Chaparral, coastal sage scrub, valley adolphia californica and foothill grassland. coast woolly Nemacaulis 1B.2 Coastal dunes. heads denudata var. denudata Coulter's Atriplex coulteri 1B.2 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes, saltbush coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland. decumbent Isocoma 1B.2 Coastal scrub. goldenbush menziesii var. decumbens delicate clarkia Clarkia delicata 1B.2 Cismontane woodland, chaparral. Del Mar Arctostaphylos FE 1B.1 Narrow endemic, Chaparral, closed-cone coniferous manzanita glandulosa ssp. Covered forest. crassifolia Del Mar Mesa Corethrogyne 1B.1 Narrow endemic, Chaparral, coastal scrub. sand aster filaginifolia var. Covered linifolia dwarf burr (San Ambrosia FE 1B.1 Narrow endemic, Chaparral, coastal scrub, valley and Diego) pumila Covered foothill grassland. ambrosia Encinitas Baccharis FT SE 1B.1 Narrow endemic, Chaparral. baccharis vanessae Covered Engelmann oak Quercus 4.2 Covered Chaparral, coast live oak woodland, engelmannii grassland.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Wednesday, December 8, 2004 Part IV Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for Brodiaea filifolia (thread- leaved brodiaea); Proposed Rule VerDate jul<14>2003 15:35 Dec 07, 2004 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\08DEP4.SGM 08DEP4 71284 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 8, 2004 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR will be available for public inspection, section). Please submit Internet by appointment, during normal business comments to [email protected] in Fish and Wildlife Service hours at the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife ASCII file format and avoid the use of Office (at the above address) (telephone special characters or any form of 50 CFR Part 17 number 760–431–9440). encryption. Please also include ‘‘Attn: Brodiaea filifolia’’ in your e-mail subject RIN 1018–AT75 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and header and your name and return Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Wildlife Service (see ADDRESSES address in the body of your message. If and Plants; Proposed Designation of section). you do not receive a confirmation from the system that we have received your Critical Habitat for Brodiaea filifolia SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (thread-leaved brodiaea) internet message, contact us directly by Public Comments Solicited calling our Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, We intend that any final action Office at phone number 760–431–9440. Interior. Please note that the Internet address resulting from this proposal be as _ ACTION: Proposed rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Critical Habitat for Brodiaea Filifolia
    42054 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 20, 2010 / Proposed Rules to the third element in the process, further consideration. We found that from the Nevada Fish and Wildlife which is to evaluate the population there is no area within the range of the Office (see ADDRESSES section). segment’s conservation status in relation Amargosa toad where the potential Author(s) to the Act’s standards for listing as an threat of development or groundwater endangered or threatened species. The withdrawal is significantly concentrated The primary authors of this notice are DPS evaluation in this finding concerns or may be substantially greater than in staff with the Nevada Fish and Wildlife the Amargosa toad that we were other portions of the range. Some sites Office, Las Vegas. petitioned to list as threatened or including Crystal and Lower Indian Authority endangered. Springs may become overgrown with The authority for this section is Discreteness vegetation and cause the site to become unsuitable and require rehabilitation. section 4 of the Endangered Species Act Under the DPS Policy, a population Cattle and feral burros may provide the of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et segment of a vertebrate taxon may be necessary disturbance to improve and seq.). considered discrete if it satisfies either maintain Amargosa toad habitat but may Dated: July 9, 2010 one of the following conditions: cause short-term overuse of some sites. Wendi Weber, (1) It is markedly separated from other Use by OHVs may cause localized Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service. populations of the same taxon as a impacts but we do not anticipate these consequence of physical, physiological, [FR Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Cramvernal Pool Endemics-Final.Pdf
    Vernal Pool Systems and Individual Vernal Pools Version 6.1 APPENDIX 1 Vernal Pool Endemic Plant List Use this list to determine if a species is a vernal pool endemic Bsed on Appendix C from: T. Keeler-Wolf, D.R. Elam, K. Lewis, S.A. Flint. 1998. California Vernal Pool Assessment Preliminary Report. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game. 161 pp. www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/wetlands/pdfs/VernalPoolAssessmentPreliminaryReport.pdf May 2013 ! CRAM%Vernal%Pool%Endemic%Plants%List May%2013 Scientific%Name Family Genus Species infraspecific_rank %infraspecific_epithet Agrostis(elliottiana POACEAE Agrostis elliottiana Agrostis(hendersonii POACEAE Agrostis hendersonii Agrostis(microphylla POACEAE Agrostis microphylla Alopecurus(carolinianus POACEAE Alopecurus carolinianus Alopecurus(saccatus POACEAE Alopecurus saccatus Anagallis(minima MYRSINACEAE Anagallis minima Astragalus(tener(var.(ferrisiae FABACEAE Astragalus tener var. ferrisiae Astragalus(tener(var.(tener FABACEAE Astragalus tener var. tener Atriplex(cordulata CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex cordulata Atriplex(cordulata(var.(cordulata CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex cordulata var. cordulata Atriplex(cordulata(var.(erecticaulis CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex cordulata var. erecticaulis Atriplex(depressa CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex depressa Atriplex(minuscula CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex minuscula Atriplex(parishii CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex parishii Atriplex(persistens CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex persistens Atriplex(subtilis CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex subtilis Blennosperma(bakeri ASTERACEAE Blennosperma
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH 17, 2020 by Mike Evans, Founder and President of Casa Del Prado Room 101, Balboa Park Tree of Life Nursery to Mulch Or Not to Mulch
    March 2020 CHAPTER MEETING Main Presentation Mulch Madness (in March) MARCH 17, 2020 by Mike Evans, Founder and President of Casa del Prado Room 101, Balboa Park Tree of Life Nursery To Mulch or Not to Mulch. Is that the question? 6:30 pm – Premeeting. 7:00 pm – Browsing & Socializing The horticultural practice of mulching or top-dressing consists of periodically applying a layer of 7:30 pm – Brief Business Meeting foreign material (organic or 7:45 pm – Main Presentation mineral) to the soil surface, under and around your landscape plants. Pre-meeting What are the pros and cons of this Dudleya Conservation: In-vitro practice, especially in natural Propagation to Combat Plant design using native plants? Is all Poaching and Extinction by Kevin Alison The genus Dudleya is a charismatic group of native succulents with many rare species across California and Baja. Recent popularity has attracted poachers who uproot these plants by mulch created equal? How the tens of thousands in attempt to supply interests overseas do wild plants in native for hefty profits. This project habitats do without aims to utilize plant tissue someone showing up to culture (Micropropagation) “mulch them?” Come hear to ethically produce large a presentation and join in a quantities of select Dudleya lively discussion. Hopefully, we’ll find answers to all these species to deflate the price questions. incentives for poachers while providing agencies with an additional tool for conservation. Kevin is a Masters of Conservation and Restoration Science (MCRS) candidate at U.C. Irvine and a native plant production specialist (R&D) at Tree of Life Nursery.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Technical Report
    BLUE CONSULTING GROUP BIOLOGY LAND USE & ENTITLEMENTS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES REPORT FOR THE PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL #1 PROPERTY SAN MARCOS, CA Update: April 28, 2015 October 12, 2012 P.O. BOX 501115 SAN DIEGO, CA 92150 1 858.391.8145 [email protected] BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES REPORT FOR THE PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL #1 PROPERTY SAN MARCOS, CA Prepared For: Pacific Industrial No. 1 LLC 105 South Pacific Street San Marcos, CA 92069 Update April 28, 2015 October 12, 2012 Prepared By: Michael K. Jefferson Senior Biologist BLUE Consulting Group P.O. Box 501115 San Diego, CA 92150 (858) 391-8145 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary of Findings 3 Introduction 4 Survey Methods 4 Existing Conditions 5 A. Topography and Soils 5 B. Botany 5 C. Zoology 6 D. Sensitive Biological Resources 7 E. Wetlands and Non-Wetland Jurisdictional Waters 11 Proposed Project Impacts / Alt. with Buffer Impact Analyis 12 A. Plant Community Impacts 14 B. Wildlife Impacts 14 C. Sensitive Biological Resources Impacts 15 D. Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. 15 Mitigation Measures 16 A. Plant Communities 16 B. Sensitive Plant Species 16 C. Sensitive Wildlife Species 16 D. Jurisdictional Waters 17 References Cited 18 Certification 21 5 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) FIGURES 1: Regional Project Location follows page 4 2: Project Location follows page 4 3: Aerial View follows page 4 4: Habitat and Sensitive Species Observed On-Site follows page 6 5: Proposed Development Impact Footprint follows page 12 6: Alternative Preserve and Buffer, Reduced Footprint follows page 13 TABLES 1: Plant Communities page 6 2: Sensitive Plant Species Observed or with the Potential for Occurrence follows page 11 3: Sensitivity Codes follows page 11 4: Sensitive Wildlife Species Potentially Occurring follows page 11 5a: Proposed Project Plant Community Impacts 12 5b: Proposed Project Rare/Sensitive Species Impacts 12 6a: Alternative-Onsite Preserve and Buffer; Plant Community Impacts 13 6b: Alternative-Onsite Preserve and Buffer; Rare/Sensitive Species Impacts 13 PHOTOGRAPHS 1: Looking north across the property from Grand Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List.Xlsx
    Family Latin name Location in garden PINACEAE Abies bracteata (D. Don) Nutt. 10, Yellow Pine W, Californian PINACEAE Abies fabri Craib 236, Asian PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 348, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 355, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 358, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 359, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies guatemalensis Rehder 360, Mexico/Central America PINACEAE Abies koreana E.H. Wilson 225, Asian PINACEAE Abies nordmanniana Spach subsp. equi-trojani Coode & Cullen 706, Mediterranean PINACEAE Abies nordmanniana Spach subsp. equi-trojani Coode & Cullen 709, Mediterranean PINACEAE Abies spectabilis (D. Don) Spach 235, Asian LAMIACEAE Acanthomintha duttonii (Abrams) Jokerst Location Restricted CACTACEAE Acharagma aguirreanum (Glass & R.A. Foster) Glass 1005, Arid House CACTACEAE Acharagma roseanum (Boed.) E.F. Anderson 1005, Arid House CACTACEAE Acharagma roseanum (Boed.) E.F. Anderson 1005, Arid House FABACEAE Acmispon dendroideus (Greene) Brouillet var. dendroideus 6B, Channel Isld., Californian CRASSULACEAE Adromischus diabolicus Toelken 1005, Arid House CRASSULACEAE Adromischus mammillaris (L.f.) Lem. 1005, Arid House CRASSULACEAE Adromischus mammillaris (L.f.) Lem. 131, Southern African CRASSULACEAE Adromischus mammillaris (L.f.) Lem. 131, Southern African CRASSULACEAE Adromischus mammillaris (L.f.) Lem. var. cinereus (L.f.) Lem. 1008, Cactus Frame CRASSULACEAE Adromischus nanus (N.E. Br.) Poelln. 1005, Arid House CRASSULACEAE Aeonium balsamiferum Webb & Berthel. 1008, Cactus Frame CRASSULACEAE Aeonium balsamiferum Webb & Berthel. 707A, Canary Islands CRASSULACEAE Aeonium balsamiferum Webb & Berthel. 707B, Canary Islands CRASSULACEAE Aeonium balsamiferum Webb & Berthel. 708, Canary Islands CRASSULACEAE Aeonium castello-paivae Bolle 1008, Cactus Frame CRASSULACEAE Aeonium castello-paivae Bolle 707A, Canary Islands CRASSULACEAE Aeonium haworthii (Salm-Dyck) Webb & Berthel.
    [Show full text]
  • Brodiaea Santarosae (Themidaceae), a New Rare Species from the Santa Rosa Basalt Area of the Santa Ana Mountains of Southern California
    MADRON˜ O, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 187–198, 2007 BRODIAEA SANTAROSAE (THEMIDACEAE), A NEW RARE SPECIES FROM THE SANTA ROSA BASALT AREA OF THE SANTA ANA MOUNTAINS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TOM CHESTER 1802 Acacia Lane, Fallbrook, CA 92028 [email protected] WAYNE ARMSTRONG Life Sciences Department, Palomar College, 1140 West Mission Road, San Marcos, CA 92069 KAY MADORE The Nature Conservancy, Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve, 22115 Tenaja Road, Murrieta, CA 92562 ABSTRACT Brodiaea santarosae (Themidaceae) is a new species from southwest Riverside County and immediately-adjacent Miller Mountain of San Diego County, CA. It is easily distinguished from other Brodiaea species in southern California by its large flowers and distinctive, variable staminodes; morphological analysis revealed 11 total differentiating characteristics. Brodiaea santarosae occurs only on or very close to the 8–11 million-year-old Santa Rosa Basalt. It has the smallest range of the southern California Brodiaeas, with just four known populations occupying only a small portion of a ,40 km2 area, plus a fifth small population disjunct by 11 km. It has been speculated that the B. santarosae population is a hybrid swarm between B. filifolia and B. orcuttii, based solely on the appearance of the staminodes and filaments in selected flowers. This speculation was rejected due to the lack of sympatry between the three taxa and because specimens of B. santarosae have numerous characteristics that are not intermediate between the claimed parent taxa. In contrast, intermediate characteristics were seen in F1 specimensofB. filifolia X B. orcuttii discovered in San Marcos, CA, the only location where those species overlap.
    [Show full text]
  • Griffin Brungraber's Resume
    Griffin Brungraber Resume of SummitWest Environmental, Inc. [email protected] 858-366-2994 www.SummitWestEnv.com http://bit.ly/DrGriffin Dr. Brungraber has over 10 years of project management and engineering experience, and over 5 years of field biology and construction monitoring experience. He has participated in many botanical and wildlife survey projects, and has extensive monitoring/compliance experience in sensitive habitats. He has worked in a diverse range of habitats including desert, national forest, coastal mountains, and urban/developed areas. Permits/Licenses Education Ca.DF&W Scientific Collecting Permit #: Ph.D, Structural Engineering 2081(a)-16-134-V. UCSD, 2009 US FWS Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Master’s Degree, Structural Engineering Independent Investigator Permit #: UCSD, 2007 45250C-0 Bachelor of Science Degree, Civil & California PE, Civil Engineering #: Environmental Engineering C79405 Bucknell University, 2005 SWPPP QSD/QSP License #: Birding by Sound, in San Diego County 22869 Instructor: Claude Edwards, 2012 CA Office of Emergency Services, Butterflies of San Diego County SAP Evaluator, License #70430 Instructor: Michael Klein in 2012. Flat-tailed horned lizard monitoring Desert Tortoise Council Workshop: Desert tortoise passive surveys Introduction to Surveying, Monitoring and Handling Techniques, 2012. Flat Tailed Horned Lizard Workshop: (FTHL) BioMonitor Training, May 2013 Representative Botanical Survey Projects: Vegetation Community Surveys, Angeles National Forrest, Fall 2017. Lead biologist performing vegetation community assessments and mapping at transmission towers for SCE, in difficult terrain. Rare Plant Surveys, Mojave National Preserve and surrounding BLM lands, Fall 2017. Botanical tech on fall-blooming rare plant surveys along a transmission line. Areas were surveyed based on summer and fall monsoonal rains, including FoShay Pass and several other uniQue habitats.
    [Show full text]